Guest Post: Ukraine Crisis - Just Another Globalist-Engineered Powder Keg

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Brandon Smith of,

When one studies history, all events seem to revolve around the applications and degenerations of war. Great feats of human understanding, realization and enlightenment barely register in the mental footnotes of the average person. War is what we remember, idealize and aggrandize, which is why war is the tool most often exploited by oligarchy to distract the masses while it centralizes power.

With the exception of a few revolutions, most wars are instigated and controlled by financial elites, manipulating governments on both sides of the game to produce a preconceived result. The rise of National Socialism in Germany, for instance, was largely funded by corporate entities based in the U.S., including Rockefeller giant Standard Oil, JPMorgan and even IBM, which built the collating machines specifically used to organize Nazi extermination camps, the same machines IBM representatives serviced on site at places like Auschwitz. As a public figure, Adolf Hitler was considered a joke by most people in German society, until, of course, the Nazi Party received incredible levels of corporate investment. This aid was most evident in what came to be known as the Keppler Fund created through the Keppler Circle, a group of interests with contacts largely based in the U.S.

George W. Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush, used his position as director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation to launder money for the Third Reich throughout the war. After being exposed and charged for trading with the enemy, the case against Bush magically disappeared in a puff of smoke, and the Bush family went on to become one of the most powerful political forces in America.

Without the aid of international conglomerates and banks, the Third Reich would have never risen to power.

The rise of communism in Russia through the Bolshevik Revolution was no different. As outlined in Professor Antony Sutton’s book Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution with vast detail and irrefutable supporting evidence, it was globalist financiers that created the social petri dish in which the communist takeover flourished.  The same financiers that aided the Nazis...

The two sides, National Socialism and communism, were essentially identical despotic governmental structures conjured by the same group of elites. These two sides, these two fraudulent ideologies, were then pitted against each other in an engineered conflict that we now call World War II, resulting in an estimated 48 million casualties globally and the ultimate formation of the United Nations, a precursor to world government.

Every major international crisis for the past century or more has ended with an even greater consolidation of world power into the hands of the few, and this is no accident.

When I discuss the concept of the false left/right paradigm with people, especially those in the liberty movement, I often see a light turn on, a moment of awareness in their faces. Many of us understand the con game because we live it day to day. We see past the superficial rhetoric of Republican and Democratic party leadership and take note of their numerous similarities, including foreign policy, domestic defense policy and economic policy. The voting records of the major players in both parties are almost identical. One is hard-pressed to find much difference in ideology between Bush and Barack Obama, for example; or Obama and John McCain; or Obama and Mitt Romney, for that matter.

When I suggest, however, that similar false paradigms are used between two apparently opposed nations, the light fades, and people are left dumbstruck. Despite the fact that globalist financiers shoveled capital into the U.S., British, German and Soviet military complexes all at the same time during World War II, many Americans do not want to believe that such a thing could be happening today.

In response, I present the crisis in Ukraine versus the crisis in Syria...

Ukraine Versus Syria

It seems as though much of the public has already forgotten that at the end of 2013, the U.S. came within a razor’s edge of economic disaster — not to mention the possibility of World War III. The war drums in Washington were thundering for “intervention” in Syria and the overthrow of Bashar Assad. The only thing that saved us, I believe, were the tireless efforts of the independent media in exposing the darker motives behind the Syrian insurgency and the bloodlust of the Obama Administration. The problem is that when the elites lose one avenue toward war and distraction, they have a tendency to simply create another. Eventually, the public is so overwhelmed by multiple trigger points and political powder kegs that they lose track of reality. I often call this the “scattergun effect.”

The crisis in the Ukraine is almost a carbon copy of the civil war in Syria, culminating in what I believe to be the exact same intent.

The Money

Money from globalist centers has been flowing into the Ukrainian opposition since at least 2004, when the Carnegie Foundation was caught filtering funds to anti-Russian political candidate Viktor Yushchenko, as well as to the groups who supported him.

The Ukrainian Supreme Court called for a runoff due to massive voter fraud and the rise of the pro-Western Orange Revolution, determining the winner to be Yushchenko over none other than Viktor Yanukovych. Yanukovych went on to win the 2010 elections, and the revolution returned to oust him this year.

It has been discovered that the current revolution has also been receiving funds from NATO and U.S. interests, not just from the State Department, but also from billionaires like Pierre Omidyar, the chairman of eBay and the new boss of journalist Glen Greenwald, the same journalist who is now famous for being the first to expose National Security Agency documents obtained by Edward Snowden.

Much of the monetary support from such financiers was being funneled to men like Oleh Rybachuk, the right-hand man to Yanukovych during the Orange Revolution and a favorite of neoconservatives and the State Department in the U.S.

The International Monetary Fund has also jumped at the chance to throw money at the new Ukrainian regime, which would prevent default of the country and allow the opposition movement to focus their attentions on Russia.

The revolution in Syria was also primarily driven by Western funds and arms transferred through training grounds like Benghazi, Libya. There is much evidence to suggest that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was designed to possibly cover up the arming of Syrian rebels by the CIA, who had agents on the ground who still have not been allowed to testify in front of Congress.

After this conspiracy was exposed in the mainstream, globalist-controlled governments decided to openly supply money and weapons to the Syrian insurgency, instead of ending the subterfuge.

The ‘Rebels’

Some revolutions are quite real in their intent and motivations. But many either become co-opted by elites through financing, or they are created from thin air from the very beginning. Usually, the rebellions that are completely fabricated tend to lean toward extreme zealotry.

The Syrian insurgency is rife with, if not entirely dominated by, men associated with al-Qaida. Governments in the U.S. and Israel continue to support the insurgency despite their open affiliation with a group that is supposedly our greatest enemy. Syrian insurgents have been recorded committing numerous atrocities, including mass execution, the torture of civilians and even the cannibalism of human organs.

The revolution in Ukraine is run primarily by the Svoboda Party, a National Socialist (fascist) organization headed by Oleh Tyahnybok.  Here is a photo of Tyahnybok giving a familiar salute:

So far, the opposition in Ukraine has been mostly careful in avoiding the same insane displays of random violence that plagued the Syrians’ public image. It is important to remember though that mainstream outlets like Reuters went far out of their way in attempts to humanize Syrian al-Qaida. Their methods were exposed only through the vigilance of the independent media. With the fascist Svoboda in power in the Ukraine, I believe it is only a matter of time before we see video reports of similar atrocities, giving Russia a perfect rationalization to use military force.

John McCain?

I am now thoroughly convinced that John McCain is a pasty ghoul of the highest order. He claims to be conservative yet supports almost every action of the Obama Administration. He is constantly defending anti-Constitutional actions by the Federal government, including the Enemy Belligerents Act, which was eventually melded into the National Defense Authorization Act; NSA surveillance of U.S. citizens; and even gun control.

And for some reason, the guy makes appearances like clockwork right before or during major overthrows of existing governments. McCain was in Libya during the coup against Moammar Gadhafi.

McCain showed up to essentially buy off the rebels in Tunisia.

McCain hung out with al-Qaida in Syria.

And, what a surprise, McCain met with the Ukrainian opposition movement just before the overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych.  Here is a photo of McCain giving a speech to the opposition with none other than Neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok standing over his left shoulder.

Why McCain? I have no idea. All I know is, if this guy shows up in your country, take cover.

Russia In The Middle

The great danger in Syria was not necessarily the chance of war with Assad. Rather, it was the chance that a war with Assad would expand into a larger conflagration with Iran and Russia. Russia’s only naval facility in the Mideast is on the coast of Tartus in Syria, and Russia has long-standing economic and political ties to Syria and Iran. Any physical action by the West in the region would have elicited a response from Vladimir Putin. The mainstream argument claims that the threat of Russian intervention scared off Obama, but I believe the only reason war actions were not executed by the White House and the globalists was because they didn’t have even minimal support from the general public. For any war, you need at least a moderate percentage of the population to back your play.

In Ukraine, we find the globalists creating tensions between the West and the East yet again. Russia’s most vital naval base sits in Crimea, an autonomous state tethered to the Ukrainian mainland. Currently, Russia has flooded Crimea with troops in response to the regime change in Ukraine. The new Ukrainian government (backed by NATO) has called this an “invasion” and an act of war, while Western warmongers like McCain and Lindsay Graham spread the propaganda meme that Russia made such a move only because Putin believes the Obama Administration to be “weak.”

Clearly, the idea here is to engineer either high tensions or eventual war between Russia and the United States. Syria failed to produce the desired outcome, so the Ukraine was tapped instead.

Energy Markets And The Dollar At Risk

In Syria, any U.S. led military action would have resulted in the immediate closing of the Straight of Hormuz by Iran, threatening to obstruct up to 30% of global petroleum shipments.  Foreign resentment could have easily led to the abandonment of the U.S. dollar as the petro-currency.  Both China and Russia implied the possibility of an economic response to American intervention, though they did not officially go into specifics.  In all likelihood, the dollar's world reserve status would have been damaged irrevocably.

In the Ukraine, the chance of intervention has been countered with VERY specific threats from Russia, including a freeze on natural gas imports to the European Union through Gazprom, which supplies approximately 30% of the EU's fuel.  In 2009, a temporary Ukranian pipeline closure led to widespread shortages across Europe.  While some in the mainstream claim that Russia's influence over EU energy has "diminished" the fact is a loss of 30% of natural gas reserves for an extended period would inflate energy prices wildly and cripple the EU's economy.

Another specific reaction given by Russia is the dumping of U.S. treasury bonds.  Russia's bond holdings may not seem like much leverage, except for the fact that China has now publicly backed Russian efforts in the Ukraine, just as they backed Russian opposition to U.S. activities in Syria.  A dump of bonds by Russia would invariably be followed by a Chinese dump as well.  In fact, China and Russia have been setting the stage for a global dollar decoupling since at least 2008.   I have been warning for years that globalists and central bankers needed a "cover event", a distraction or scapegoat imposing enough to provide a veil of chaos in which they could then destroy the greenback as the world reserve and usher in a global currency system.  The Ukraine crisis offers yet another opportunity for this plan to unfold.

The False Paradigm And The Globalist Chessboard

So far, I have outlined what appears to be a correspondence of conspiracy between Syria and the Ukraine and how each event has the continued potential to trigger regional conflict, dollar collapse, or world war. But is this conspiracy one-sided? Are only the West and NATO being manipulated by globalists to box in Russia and provoke a conflict? And what do globalists have to gain by sparking such disaster?

As with every other catastrophic fabricated war, the goal is the erasure of sovereign identity while consolidating economic, political and social power. It is not enough that global financiers dominate the banking industry and own most politicians; they want to transform the public psyche. They want US to ask THEM for global governance. This manufacture of consent is often achieved by pitting two controlled governments against each other and then, in the wake of the tragedy, calling for global unification. The argument is always presented that if we simply abandoned the concept of nation states and reform under a single world body, all war would “disappear.”

The question is whether Russia’s Putin is aware of the plan. Is he a part of it?  Are we seeing repeat theater of a puppet Russia versus a puppet NATO like that witnessed during the Cold War?

What I do know is that Putin has, a number of times in the past, called for global control of the economy through the IMF and the institution of a new global currency using the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDR).

Loans from the IMF are what saved Russia from debt default in the late 1990s. And Putin has recently called for consultations with the IMF concerning Crimea. Remember, this is the same IMF that is working to fund his opponents in Western Ukraine.

Bottom line, if you believe in national sovereignty and decentralization of power, Putin is NOT your buddy. Once again, we have the globalists injecting money into both sides of a conflict which could morph into something nightmarish.  Putin wants global economic governance and consolidation under the IMF just as much as the supposedly "American-run" IMF wants consolidation.  Global governance of finance and money creation ultimately means global governance of everything else.

Is a war being created through the false paradigm of East versus West in order to pave the road for global government?  Are East/West tensions being exploited as a smokescreen for the final destruction of the dollar's world reserve status?  It is hard to say if the Ukraine will be the final trigger; however, the evidence suggests that if a conflict occurs, regardless of who “wins” such a scenario, the IMF comes out on top.

Imagine you are playing a game of chess by yourself. Which side wins at the end of that game: black or white? The answer is it doesn’t matter. You always win when you control both sides.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
JustObserving's picture

The Nobel Prize Winner's hypocrisy is infinite as is his hubris:

Obama Comes Out Against Self-Determination

Paul Craig Roberts

The White House Fool has repeatedly declared erroneously and foolishly that it is “against international law” for Crimea to exercise self-determination. Self-determination, as used by Washington, is a propaganda term that serves Washington’s empire but is not permissible for real people to exercise. On March 6 Obama telephoned Putin to tell the Russian President again that only Washington has the right to interfere in Ukraine and to insist against all logic that only the “government” in Kiev installed by the Washington-organized coup is “legitimate” and “democratic.”

In other words, the elected government in Crimea pushed by the people in Crimea to give them a vote on their future is “undemocratic” and “illegitimate,” but a non-elected government in Kiev imposed by Washington is the voice of self-determination and legitimacy.

Washington is so arrogant that it never occurs to the hubris-infected fools what the world thinks of Washington’s blatant hypocrisy.

Since the Clinton regime, Washington has done nothing but violate international law–Serbia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Honduras, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia.

Does Russia have an Africa Command? No, but Washington does.

Is Russia surrounding the US with military bases? No, but Washington has used the NATO organization, whose purpose disappeared 23 years ago, to organize western, eastern, and southern Europe into an empire army with forward bases on Russia’s borders. Washington is determined to extend the boundaries of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization to Georgia in central Asia and to Ukraine on the Black Sea. Both Georgia and Ukraine are former constituent parts of both Russia and the Soviet Union.

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

The remaining oil will last twice as long (or more) if there are half the people.

Carpenter1's picture

The US realized the strait of Hormuz could be closed, leading to economic shocks and possibly global backlash against the US, so they abandoned the plan.

Yeah, they never considered that the 15 years they were planning this war, only occurred to them at that point. /disregard

Arius's picture

bunch of crap ...


Ms. Wahl who resigned on the air .... that is the big thing!

A real American Hero!

she and her partner who works as physician taking care of the wounded in a military base ....


where do they find these bosos?

National Blessing's picture

It's not the globalists.  It's more about race.  The eastern Ukranians look very European.  Blond hair.  Blue eyes.  Their Hitler's wet dream.

Meanwhile, the folks on the Crimean look very Eurasian.  High cheek-bones.  Black hair.  Dark eyes.  They consider themselves Russian.

What we have is an old-fashioned race war brewing.  Bitches.

Cap Matifou's picture

"Freedom" has arrived, and that had a price, i guess.

Ukrainian gold reserves loaded on an unidentified transport aircraft in Kiev’s Borispol airport and flown to Uncle Sam’s vault


DYS's picture

I believe you made incoorect use of the close symbol (/).


The joke here is that the aformentioned having been opened by a contextual marker (i.e. <sarc>).   In a sense, what you have done is open a "disregard" contextual marker on your own comment.   This means that we should disregard what you wrote, which I don't believe was the intention of your marker.   



tasmandevil's picture

The remaining oil will last forever without anyone here, is your point? And possibly grow more..

Beat me up Scotty

logicalman's picture

The remaining oil will last twice as long if the military stop wasting it.


Thought Processor's picture



All wars are economic wars.  


And some wars are staged to reset or reshuffle the economics of regions or even the world as a whole.


History shows this.  Follow the money and who benefits.


LMAOLORI's picture



Good for population control and getting rid of useless eaters and the save the world kill yourself folks would be gleefull (until the lower eschelons in the movement figured out they would be among the casualties).

Headbanger's picture

Oh puleeeze...  Stop with the "globalist" shit !!

What do you think England and Spain were a few hundred years ago?/

And there was this thing called the fucking Roman Empire before that!

So this is nothing new and no "New Fucking Normal" either cause it's been going on for thousands of years you mooks!

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

No one had nuclear weapons and the ability to kill everything on the planet back then either.  Consolidate power, nuke a few billion people, come back bigger and badder than ever after the dust settles.  TPTB will still be TPTB and the slaves that are left will still be slaves.  And the resources that are left will last a lot longer because there won't be as many useless eaters wasting them.

Kirk2NCC1701's picture

Scotty, Bones asked me what the engineer in you thinks about the residual radiation and nuclear waste that will remain after a few billion people have been wiped out.

Can Bones still vacation on Earth, or should he join me (as I keep suggesting) for shore-leave in the Virgo Cluster?

logicalman's picture

I thought clusters of virgins were for islamic jihadists!

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

Kirk, the engineer in me tells me TPTB think they are invincible.  Hiroshima and Nagasaki were rebuilt.  They aren't unlivable hot spots for millions of years.  My take is they think they can manage some population control and survive unscathed.  Too bad the shields are down and the warp drive is out.  Impulse power isn't going to save our asses.  Hope you have another Kobyashi Maru card up your sleeve.

johnQpublic's picture


stones melted together in india

statues and chains in 320 million year old coal veins

getting te feeling we have done the nuclear anihalation thing before

TheReplacement's picture

And probably will again and again.  Reincarnation, Ragnarock, Armageddon-new-earth, yeah, pretty much covers all of the major religious themes. 

Wouldn't that be funny.

Abitdodgie's picture

Headbanger, you are right it has been going on for 6,000 years and the same 13 ruling familys are ALWAYS in control . Just like every single presedent of the US (bar 2 ) have been related to the royal family. So carefull who you call mooks.

css1971's picture

Doubt it.

Look, this is nonsense. There are simply mathematical benefits to centralisation which will allow some people to benefit at the expense of the rest. When there are the resources to do it, the tendency will be to centralise and increase the economies of scale. Centralised systems though are unstable, they can't process the information fast enough, the world changes round them. This is why governments are consistently caught by surprise.

kchrisc's picture

"...and the same 13 ruling familys are ALWAYS in control."

"Just like every single presedent of the US (bar 2 ) have been related to the royal family."

References/links please.

UPDATE: No really, I would like the references so I can see for myself. Thanks.

UselessEater's picture

Blood Lines of the Illuminati Fritz Springmeier is an interesting source - he has a few books (I read this one, it wasn't a pleasant journey) and he has interviews on Youtube.

Here's a short hand list of the 13 bloodlines based on his research (I haven't read the rest of this website as I just hit a google search for you).


Headbanger's picture

Or what!? 

Fuck you mookie boy!

And you would probably like it too!

Anusocracy's picture

Exactly. Megalomaniacs didn't just show up in the gene pool.

They've been around a for very very long time.

TheReplacement's picture

Some people deny that human nature drives humans.  We are what we are and we are very diverse.  Some people want to grow daisies, others push them.  Some want to be rich, others happy.  Some want to make the world a better place, others watch it burn. 

Go thru history and look at who benefits from wars.  Humans.  Someone benefits from just about every war.  That doesn't make it a grand conspiracy.  Certainly there are conspirators but it's highly likely they conspire against each other as much as anyone else.  When someone wins a war they tend to benefit from it.  Other parties that bet well do too. 

If anyone really thinks it's all part of a grand unified conspiracy then go do something about it.

In the meantime, just say no to war in Ukraine and Syria.  Let Europe start paying their own way.

Anusocracy's picture

"Go thru history and look at who benefits from wars. Humans. Someone benefits from just about every war."

Certainly, some benefit from the misery and death others. I like to think of them as subhumans.

Best if they never existed.

devnickle's picture


"I'm sick of warmongers"



That's an understatement. Perhaps all us "useless eaters" should install our own puppet government in D.C?

Abitdodgie's picture

We should blame ourselves for what is happening , because we let them by doing nothing and in most cases supporting them , how many people still pay taxes to support this shit ( I stoped paying 6 years ago ) if we all did this game would stop very quickly but people like been slaves they feel safe.

BigJim's picture

How do you avoid paying all taxes? Sales, income, council, etc, etc... do you live out in the middle of a desert or something?

TuPhat's picture

Abit, They don't need our taxes to do what they want.  Did you forget they can print as many dollars as it takes and then some for entertainment on the side?  Taxes are a means of control but not the only means.

El Oregonian's picture

Please. I beg you. OPEN YOUR 'EFFING' EYES!!! It's the BANKSTERS!!! Cut off their heads and kill the serpent!!!


Abitdodgie's picture

Cut off their heads and kill the serpent!!!   And how are you going to do that pray tell .

Dick Buttkiss's picture

The global money and banking cartel is collapsing under its own weight. Only this time, a gold-like "flight to quality" is at the fingertips of the bulk of humankind, and TPTB will be helpless to stop it:

UselessEater's picture

Wishful thinking ...this time it will be different.

Dick Buttkiss's picture

This is all about technology finally empowering the individual more than the state, with the latter continually losing ground.

So yes, it's different this time.

Which isn't to say that the state, in its inherent insanity, won't try to put an end to humanity rather than lose control over it.

UselessEater's picture

IMHO I doubt it especially if one considers who funds this kind of tech. Catherine Austin Fitts has some interesting perspectives of tech and the break away society funded by the hidden black budget USD40T plus in her estimation, and we all know there are very murky business links of DARPA etc. It is entirely plausible that the patents slapped on tech and the blocks to new inventors getting patents that conflict with 'national security' prevent us from truly seeing how tech is empowering TPTB.

Just saying keep eyes wide open; there is more than one generation who thought they were overthrowing the psycho's whilst walking into their game plan.


August's picture

If you can get to them, they're not the ones you're looking for.

Anusocracy's picture

So if government didn't exist the banksters would still be doing all this shit? And why just banksters, why not environmentalists, religions, militaries, unions, corporations, and government lovers of all stripes. All who are desirous of controlling everyone else through the use of force.

Perhaps you don't understand the consequences of government:

Everything government touches turns to crap. -Ringo Starr

EVERYBODY thinks their use of government is noble and just and if you don't approve, you must be stupid or insane.

Tell that to the hundreds of millions who died at the hands of government.

runningman18's picture

Governments are just tools (or weapons) for elitists.  Blaming a gun for the crime of the person holding it is not a practical solution.  Blaming governments for being corrupt is not enough, you also have to remove those who did the corrupting. 

Anusocracy's picture

Not the same.

Government is not an inanimate object. It is a collection of not fully formed humans.

runningman18's picture

The people within government can be used like tools too.  Actually, most politicians are bought and paid for.  They do what they are told, and might as well be inanimate objects...

kchrisc's picture

"...and might as well be inanimate objects..."

My guillotine will sort it out.

Anusocracy's picture

And, of course, anyone can be used like a tool - like voters.

Still, they are not inanimate objects. A gun doesn't kill without a user, but governments (made up of people) can kill without a "user".

runningman18's picture

Name me a government that has killed without a user...