This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Short, sweet and to the point.
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
It’s appropriate that the phrase “new world order” is associated with The Economist because as much as any western publication, The Economist is on board with the banker cartel and its dream of a new order.
That’s the meaning of the fight over Georgia, the Ukraine, and Russia itself. Without the defeat of Russia, the New World Order cannot succeed.
The money to build and finance a one-world socialistic state isn’t coming from Putin. It comes from super-rich world tycoons, the likes of the Rothschilds, i.e., the international bankers and business cartels who own the world’s media, the likes of The Economist. And "none dare call it treason" -- except Putin.
Pinto Currency explains: “The clowns are the elitist bankers who got us here - we need to get the facts straight. The Economist is simply an advertizing rag for the elitist bankers and the pages are not even useful for lining a bird cage as they are too glossy. Not sure there is a useful purpose for what is really the City of London's Pravda.”
Today, writes Wikipedia, The Economist “publication belongs to The Economist Group, half of which is owned by Pearson PLC via Financial Times. A group of independent shareholders, including many members of the staff and the Rothschild banking family of England, owns the rest. A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission.
“The Economist claims that it ‘is not a chronicle of economics… It takes an editorial stance which is supportive of free trade, globalisation, free immigration and socially liberal causes… About two thirds of the 75 staff journalists are based in London, despite the global emphasis.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist
Is that a tank in your pocket ...or are you just very happy to see me?
"I am a professional Russian."
Fuck the Economist!
2 nipple piercings away from becoming Leather Daddy of the Year!
I was going to ask what kind of tank that is, it looks oddly antique, but a little googling suggests it's Russia's current main battle tank T-90, based on the T-72, etc. All I've seen so far on the Ukraine side were some (very) light tanks that looked seriously antique.
Why, oh why does The Economist suck so much ass? (Rhetorical question, we're talking about "public" schools here).
because at their hearts they are leftists?
Did Team Obama Blunder Or Conspire In Ukraine
http://thenewsdoctors.com/?p=127982
Good link but old news. PCR on this weeks ago.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
Putin's got the Third Reich, Nazi image of homosex. It's legion.
I'm not sure why this cluster fuck hasn't been used to purge our side of all it's bati-boys and kniving money grubers, from obama all down the red and blue side. "sorry guys, you fucked up, out on your ass"
When????
This will not stand. This will not stand this aggression against.... Ukraine.
(starting at 2:55)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHr4AIiHVyY