Dramatic Aerial Video Of Worst Ever Balkan Flooding

Tyler Durden's picture

Wondering what Eastern Europe will blame its economic weakness on? No, not sanctions... but perhaps the second coming of Noah might slow things down a little. The overall death toll in the worst flooding in the Balkans has risen to at least 47 people. The images have to be seen to be believed.

AFP has the details:

Bosnia said Monday it was witnessing "the biggest exodus" since the 1990s war after the worst floods in a century inundated huge swathes of the Balkans, killing at least 47 people.

Muddy waters from the Sava River have submerged houses, churches, mosques and roads in Bosnia, Serbia and Croatia after record rainfall last week wreaked havoc across the region.

There were fears that dead bodies and animal carcasses could lead to disease outbreaks, while officials warned that 120,000 unexploded mines from the conflicts of the 1990s could be dislodged.

"More than 100,000 people" have been evacuated in Bosnia alone, said Stanko Sliskovic of Bosnia's emergency services, with tens of thousands more displaced in neighbouring countries.

"This is the biggest exodus since the end of the 1992-1995 war," he told AFP.

Dozens of towns and villages have been cut off and over 2,000 landslides already reported, with water levels expected to continue rising in the coming days.

In Kosova, a hamlet between the northwestern Bosnian towns of Doboj and Maglaj which was badly hit by flooding, people's homes were almost visibly moving as the loose terrain shifted.

Around 20 homes "have slid down 30 metres (yards) since yesterday. They will not exist tomorrow," a rescue worker said.

Bosnian Foreign Minister Zlatko Lagumdzija said more than a quarter of the country's population of 3.8 million "has been affected by the floods" after the heaviest rainfalls on record began last week.

"Right now, more than one million people have no water," he said.

In Serbia, some 600,000 of its 7.2 million inhabitants were affected by "severe floods following the heaviest rains the Balkans have witnessed in 120 years," the UN's World Food Programme said in a statement.

"This is Armageddon, I can't describe it otherwise," Nedeljko Brankovic told AFP from Krupanj, a town in the southwestern Serbia. "Houses are literally washed away and landslides are everywhere."

The death toll from the floods rose to 47 Monday after two new victims were found overnight in a village near the western Serbian town of Sabac.

Neighbouring Croatia has also evacuated thousands of people from along the river Sava.

Rescuers told of wrenching scenes as they finally reached cut-off villages, with dozens of people huddling on top of the tallest houses with no water or food.

"It was like a tsunami," said Suad Garanovic, resident of the Bosnian village of Topcic Polje, as he looked over his house, now drowned in mud.

"This is the second time I've fled my house. The first time was during the war. Now, just like then, I've lost everything," said Nihad Smajlovic in a nearby hamlet.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
BigJim's picture

C'mon, FlakMeister,  tell us it's all down to that evil CO2 stuff that plants just can't get enough of.

Pladizow's picture

I like the end where Hillary shows up for a swim!

cifo's picture

America will help them recover.

Stackers's picture

George Bush hates Balkan people

Ignatius's picture

Why not, he hated New Orleans.

Kinda has that New Orleans circa 2005 look to it.

Oliver Klozoff's picture

Yeah but where are all the looters?

wee-weed up's picture



Too bad this did not happen back when they were trying to genocide each other.

Maybe the death toll back then would have been much less.

DogOfSinope's picture


Further more, if there were no involment of Victoria Nuland-likes there in the beginning of 90's - said genocide attempts maybe wouldn't happen at all?

gold-is-not-dead's picture

unity and brotherhood all over again... and btw, in the middle of flood infrastructure holds and people who stayed have access to blockchain and licence to kill... oh the good times...

Manthong's picture

"120,000 unexploded mines"...  WTF?

Theta_Burn's picture


 Pic of the Bush's fishing the streets of New Orleans during Katrina..


Richard Head's picture

Didn't notice any brain damage on that pig.

are we there yet's picture

gaag.... hillary in a swimsuit ..... don't stop there, Wookie and Hillary jello wrestling each other.

Uber Vandal's picture

I thought it was Brawndo that plants craved (can't get enough of) for the Electrolytes.

NidStyles's picture

Funny considering how last week they were bitching about drought in Eastern Europe...

mrpxsytin's picture

Further proof of climate change. See it changes from week to week. Now pay all your money to the UN and they will ensure year round homeostasis. 

NidStyles's picture

According to the IRS I'm broke ;-)

wee-weed up's picture



Humorous tale...

AlGore told Tipper her hot flashes were not due to menapause...

But because of Global Warming.

He's been seeking his limited "pleasures" on massage tables ever since.

James_Cole's picture

Yep Nid -- they are related!

Fuck it, just look at my links below..

whoisonfirst's picture

Careful what you wish for, you might get it.

nmewn's picture

I can speak for him, this would be the cold-wet part of global warming...the hot/cold/wet/dry/windy/calm experience of AGW.

See, the ice breakers got stuck in the ice that wasn't there a hundred years ago, so thats proof of global warming. And the ice pack is actually growing in the southern hemisphere, so again, thats proof of global warming. Its dry in California as witnessed by the native tumbleweeds that grow there, so again...global warming.

These flood waters will eventually rush into the sea, so again...

James_Cole's picture

I know you guys are geniuses, so put this together:



After the harshest winter in decades, the Balkans region in the southeast of Europe is now facing its hottest summer and the worst drought across the area in nearly 40 years, officials say.


"This is the greatest flooding disaster ever. Not only in the past 100 years; this has never happened in Serbia's history,"

nmewn's picture

The Sava is spring fed...you sayin this is from snow pack in the Alps ace? ;-)

James_Cole's picture

No the point is they had a drought last winter, up to very recently restricting water use. So drought + heavy rain = ?

People have predicted droughts / floods tied to global warming since the 80s (and before). 

nmewn's picture

We have droughts here too (its called weather) so bad the swamps catch fire from lightening strikes from a passing storm that doesn't give hardly any rain...real wrath of God type stuff, smoke blotting out the sun an all. The only thing that stops it is...rain.

This year, a lot of rain, rivers overflowing, swamps are all full again...so what?

Its been going on for thousands of years, we here, in this time & space, are not special snowfllakes ;-)

James_Cole's picture

You may have missed the bit about "worst drought in half a century" &  "worst flooding in a century"

It's about trends, not "opp cold outside my house today, GLOBAL WARMING MUST BE ALL BULLSHIT!!!

See where you fit in here:


nmewn's picture

So the "trend" is for the earth to self correct places that are normally moderate to wet in our life time?


Let me know when the Sahara is getting ready to return to lush foilage so I can pick out a spot, before all the SUV's come driving in and return it to desert.

nmewn's picture

Pretty sure the Sahara happened waaaayyyy before trains and SUV's.


what's that smell's picture

you are a brave blogger to take on these agw fuctards.

maybe they should go over to max keiser's site and join the crash JPM / silver liberation / bitcoin / AGW shrieking.

smells like the middle ages...."burn the denier (wytch)!"

nmewn's picture

Its like a hobby with me, I like to watch their heads explode when rational people disagree with them...lol...obviously I'm a heretic to them.

But I think I'll float ok ;-)

LetThemEatRand's picture

You're not going to convince this crowd, because the very concept that man can affect the overall environment such that coordinated effort is necessary to combat it is antithetical to the pure libertarian mind-set. And of course a bunch of NWO types have seized upon the issue to enrich themselves, giving all "skeptics" a nice cover to explain that almost all scientists have it wrong.   So I recommend that you do as I do.  Say fuck it, by a V8 (or a V12 if you can afford one), smirk while reading these same guys acknowledge that Fukishima (a single nuclear power plant) is a serious threat to human-kind (it is), and figure that something else is going to kill you far sooner anyway.   

James_Cole's picture

Say fuck it, by a V8 (or a V12 if you can afford one), smirk while reading these same guys acknowledge that Fukishima (a single nuclear power plant) is a serious threat to human-kind (it is), and figure that something else is going to kill you far sooner anyway.   

It's just bizarre that some people are still in denial. Why do I respond? Good question.. can't resist. It always seems like with a tiny bit more info people will come around. 

Worldwide most people understand it though, unfortunately there's no realistic solutions presented yet..

nmewn's picture

Would either of you two jokers like to explain how it is, that a modern ship got trapped in Antarctic ice trying to prove the South Pole is warmer than it was one hundred years ago, when a less than modern ship (by our own current standards today) actually made it and landed on terra firma (that would be solid ground, as in soil) one hundred years ago?

(Tapping finger)

FredFlintstone's picture

Its real complicated. You probably wouldn't understand. Besides, you are so blinded by ideology that you wouldn't see the obvious. SARC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nmewn's picture

lol...thats the other thing, notice how they always say we peasants are too stooooopid to understand. We should just trust in governmental bodies and the scientists which government funds in this "research" who have, actually, sold away all trust.

We should just submit to moar taxation & regulation willingly, cuz they're smart and we're all gonna die in a gigantic fireball if we don't ;-)

James_Cole's picture

lol...thats the other thing, notice how they always say we peasants are too stooooopid to understand.

Please point out where I said people were too stupid to understand? 

It's denial, not intelligence. LTER said what's probably true - AGW doesn't fit with some peoples world views so they perform mental gymnastics to get around it. 

nmewn's picture

You expose yourself.

It fits with your and LTER's "world views" though doesn't it?

James_Cole's picture

It fits with your and LTER's "world views" though doesn't it?

No and it wouldn't need to, facts (+ 97% of climate scientists) are entirely in agreement. Even exxon and I see the same on this issue. 

What you are saying is against what the overwhelming majority of people who have studied this issue concluded. So the question is...why? Clearly it's not a fact-based reason so one has to speculate why. 

Slave's picture

You don't even know where that 97% number comes from do you?

Please, go look it up. Please.

BigJim's picture

I'll tell you what James. Why don't you pull up some of the 'bullshit' articles debunking the '97% consensus', and debunk them? Because, having read around the subject a wee bit, it's clear the '97% consensus' that is trotted out to tell us that AGW is a ginormous peril to humankind is bullshit.

It's also irrelevant.

James_Cole's picture

I'll tell you what James. Why don't you pull up some of the 'bullshit' articles debunking the '97% consensus', and debunk them?

Just did?

Flakmeister's picture

I suppose you should have cited the accredited or peer reviewed studies quantifying the concensus  directly (free versions where available)

2004: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1686.full   (not peer reviewed)

2009: http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

2010: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract

2013: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article

The scientific debate is over.....

fwaynemartin's picture

So 97% are wrong. What's your point?

nmewn's picture

He's a consensus flat earther, no hope...lol.

MeelionDollerBogus's picture

the point is those 97% are provably right using measured evidence meaning you and the other 3% are in fact wrong and so wrong you'll pretend hotter temperatures is actually "cooling", that's how far wrong you are.