With Cantor Down, Which Other Politicians Has Goldman Invested In?

Tyler Durden's picture

As we showed yesterday, with the shocking departure of Eric Cantor from the political scene, perhaps no firm is more disappointed that it will not generate the hoped 77,500%+ IRR on its "investment" in the Republican politician than Goldman Sachs. Indeed, of all 435 representatives in the House, Cantor was the one person that Goldman had contributed the most cash to in 2014 (surpassed only by 5 other Congressmen, all Senators). But before you panic just how will Goldman survive with its best-funded "representative" on his way out, here is a list of all the other representatives and senators that Goldman has invested its hard-stolen earned cash in just the 2014 year alone.

From Opensecrets

 

 

And that is just page 1 of 3.

And a longer-term breakdown:

* * *

So don't worry: even without Eric Cantor, Goldman will be ok.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Oldwood's picture

I thought Goldman never had a down day?We shall see.

It looks like they have the board covered pretty well. Hedges on every bet?

But not much Tea Partying going on.

yrad's picture

Hey Goldman! I’m precinct 39 chairman of the Republican Party here in Texas (tho I was a Ron Paul supporter). I can be bought for $200 a month!

 

On a side note, how in the hell do you give Shelia Jackson Lee $3k? Your "investment" is being spent on crack cocain.

Greenskeeper_Carl's picture

Didn't see rands name on the list. Pretty funny that ole Ted Cruz couldn't get his wife's office to pony up more than 1000 though. Paul Ryan is on there too. These people are so full of shit it's not even funny any more.

optimator's picture

Cruz's wife could be on the really fast track if hubby performs and delivers.  No cash needed.

TeamDepends's picture

Speaking of cash, word is Diebold is seeking a new maintenance technician for the eastern seaboard region.

BLOTTO's picture

Last Tuesday, June 3, 2014, pro-amnesty RINO Congressman and House majority leader Eric Cantor was defeated in the Republican Primary election by an unknown, David Brat, despite having outspent Brat by a whopping 4,333% of $5.2m to Brat’s $120,000.

.

More info for consideration

http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/06/11/david-defeats-goliath-in-virg...

Harbanger's picture

I'm enojying watching the Libs cry over Cantors loss on the MSM.  You would think a Democrat lost.

Citxmech's picture

That should tell anyone who self-identifies as a Democrat something, eh?

Burticus's picture

Elephant costume, jackass costume, same puppeteers.  Nothing changes in a one-party system.

Citxmech's picture

Ryan better watch out.  His number could be up on his next cycle.

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

Can't he just pull a Murkowski and run as an independent? Not sure why everyone is counting him out at this point. I guess she won on write in votes. So he could still end up retaining his seat. Maybe without the R behind his name. Goldman would be no worse off.

icanhasbailout's picture

No, Virginia has 'sore loser' laws which prohibit it.

r00t61's picture

Virginia has a "sore loser" law that prevents a loser in a primary election from then running as an independent in the general election.

https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+24.2-520

Ironically enough, sore-loser laws were originally instituted to further entrench the 2-party system, i.e., by preventing a non-establishment candidate who for marketing reasons might have chosen to put an "R" or a "D" behind his name in a primary, try again in the general election as an "I."

That it is now being used to prevent an ossified, inbred Demopublican parasite like Cantor from running again is a small slice of justice in an otherwise corrupt and disgusting universe.

PS: The possibility of Cantor running again as a write-in candidate in the general election is a legal grey area; and would probably be subject to great scrutiny should he attempt this strategy.  Then again, being a politician, means by definition that he is a lawbreaker, so who knows what he'll get away with to prevent having power wrested away from him.

wee-weed up's picture

Jon Corzine is the Top Contributor?

Gee... I wonder where Corzine got all that money to contribute?

Greenskeeper_Carl's picture

Ha no shit. The mystery of where all that money 'disappeared' to has finally been solved. I would have guessed Cayman Islands, but this makes sense too.

wee-weed up's picture

Yep, Corzine didn't hide that stolen money...

He "invested" it... in buying a top congresscritter!

sessinpo's picture

wee-weed up         Jon Corzine is the Top Contributor?  Gee... I wonder where Corzine got all that money to contribute?

---

Corzine stole and lost client money, not his own money. Thus he has all the money inthe world. The prick should be in jail for life.

wee-weed up's picture

Gee thanks, sessinpo, I had no clue until you told me!  ;-)

sessinpo's picture

wee-weed up   Gee thanks, sessinpo, I had no clue until you told me!  ;-)

---

Apparently not, otherwise you wouldn't have posted such a message, sarcastic or not.

TheReplacement's picture

What are you talking about?  That's a type.  Jon Corzine is in prison.  Eric Holder put him there on Obama's orders.  The whole House and Senate held a joint moment of silence in honor of those Corzine victimized.  A celebration of the conviction and sentence was held immediately following. 

Free Jon Corzine!

0b1knob's picture

Didn't Choomboy get about $1 million from GS?   That dwarfs congressional donations.

Choomboy isn't known as president Goldman Sacs for nothing.

Rainman's picture

To find out who your local Congresscitter really works for....

                                  http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/

putaipan's picture

did anyone see blankenberg on charlie rose last night? omg-scary.

TheReplacement's picture

I've never heard him called that before.  President Sucks Goldman, yeah, but not the thing you said.

NOTaREALmerican's picture

Jeeezzzz,  you make it sound like our politicians are for sale or somethin' .  

TheReplacement's picture

Not really.  Imagine what might happen to you if you tried to rent them.  No they are for rent but only to the real PTB, like a mistress, to be discarded when something better comes along.  Bosses don't let their mistresses fool around with other guys.  That just gets people killed.

McMolotov's picture

These assholes just made my hit list, I mean shit list.

RacerX's picture

something tells me they're still going to get their money's worth out of Cantor.

Greenskeeper_Carl's picture

It just blows my mind that these people are that cheap. Not surprised that it happens, not in the least. But it is surprising that all it takes to sway these whores is a few thousand dollars apiece. From a bank that takes in billions, lots of which is made illegally, and all they have to do is pay a small % in fines, not admit wrong doing. And the price of getting away with it is handing these congress critters a few thousand. We get the govt we deserve, I suppose.

Oldwood's picture

Given the tendency for most of these guy's wealth to grow considerably while in service, I would assume most of their "support" comes from lesser visible areas (business interests like land development in Nevada). These numbers are token amounts, to keep our focus not on what the left hand is doing.

Ferrari's picture

Agreed. Sort of like TARP vs. the Fed's back door largesse which was the real deal, yet got so little press. What we see is the best case scenario. The real crimes go on behind the curtain.

atthelake's picture

I think we should find a way to take back that ill-gotten wealth.

TheReplacement's picture

Execute all the treasonous criminal snakes.  After a year the state of Georgia could simply confiscate it as abandoned.

atthelake's picture

I think we should find a way to, legally, take back that ill-gotten wealth.

Dr. Engali's picture

It's not just what they invest in their campaigns, it's also the returns the politicos get in their 'blind trusts'.

Greenskeeper_Carl's picture

Oh I understand that too. It's just so shameless, how they grease the palms of almost everyone. No matter who is in charge, or what party is running this committee on any given year, the people running the show all have goldmans dirty money in their pockets. And countless others too. I'd like to see the list for JPM, or Lockheed. I bet it looks just like this one, except its got mcstain at the top of all the defense contractors lists.

NoWayJose's picture

And this is what the US Supreme Court considers 'free speech'....

Duffy Duck's picture

Really?  Where'd you read that?

sessinpo's picture

Duffy Duck    Really?  Where'd you read that?

---

Corporate Personhood.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010, 558  U.S. (2010), (Docket No. 0805). The US Supreme Court held that the 1st Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.

Where have you been?

 

chinoslims's picture

Money is influence.  I can prove it.  Go to a strip club and see what the strippers are willing to do when you put enough money in front of them.  Does that mean our politicians are whores?

TheReplacement's picture

Worse than that.  At least with whores anyone with a bit of dough can get a piece.  These guys above are not whores but wholly bought and paid for.  You might have money but they aren't going to go your way unless you are a member of the club.  You are not a member of the club.  They will still take your money though.

stant's picture

The panic on with the tv news clowns is sweet to watch. Dc is already like war time Berlin. I bet dyna corp will get more than the 1 bill $ contract now to beef up security for civil unrest . Hope they are all living in fear. After the crap they have put us through

astroloungers's picture

it would have been faster just to list the critters that got no GS chum. they all should go.....critters should be drafted for a 1 year term.

Dr. Engali's picture

Which other politicians has the squid invested in?...... One is too many.

Oldwood's picture

With the lucrative nature of "serving the people" they should at least be paying us, instead of the taxpayer endowing them. Just sayin, corruption should benefit us all.

Bemused Observer's picture

How much can one 'hedge' before one's winnings are depleted by covering all the other possibilities?

kchrisc's picture

The organ grinder Goldman will own this monkey just as much as the last one.

"Dance you fucking monkey, dance!"

icanhasbailout's picture

I'll take the other side of that bet.

g speed's picture

the new vetting list along with immigration reform and common core----