Ron Paul Questions: Obama's Foreign Policy Rhetoric Does Not Match US Actions

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Ron Paul via The Ron Paul Institute,

President Obama’s recent foreign policy speech, delivered at this year’s West Point graduation ceremony, was a disappointment to anyone who hoped the president might be changing course. The failure of each US intervention thus far in the 21st century might have inspired at least a bit of reflection.
 
However, the president made it clear that interventionism and American exceptionalism would continue to guide his administration in its final two years. The president said, “I believe in American exceptionalism with every fiber of my being,” adding the dubious claim that “because of American diplomacy and foreign assistance, as well as the sacrifices of our military -- more people live under elected governments today than at any time in human history.”
 
It’s funny he would mention elections. Last week the Syrians held their first multi-candidate presidential election in 50 years. Almost three-quarters of Syrian voters participated, giving President Assad 88 percent of the vote. After three years fighting a foreign-backed insurgency, voting conditions were not optimal. However, despite State Department claims to the contrary, it can no longer be stated that Assad enjoys no popularity in his country. Even former CIA chief Michael Hayden not long ago envisioned Assad winning a fair election in Syria.
 
But the US government completely rejected the vote in Syria, with Secretary of State John Kerry calling it "a great big zero," because, as he put it, “you can't have an election where millions of your people don't even have an ability to vote."
 
That is just what happened last month in Ukraine, however, where the US-backed oligarch Petro Poroshenko won with just over 50 percent of the vote in an election where millions in the eastern part of the country did not have the ability to vote. That election, however, John Kerry declared a “victory for democracy.”
 
Similarly, John Kerry described the 2013 coup against the democratically-elected President Morsi in Egypt as a “return to democracy,” while approving the election last month – with 96 percent of the vote -- of the man who led that coup.
 
Likewise, when a referendum was held in Crimea this spring in which the vast majority voted to re-join Russia rather than to remain in a Ukraine that had just undergone a regime change, the US administration refused to recognize the results. For Washington, it was “illegal” for Crimea to vote to secede from Ukraine, but it was not illegal for a mob in the street to overthrow an elected government in Kiev.
 
President Obama’s spoke at length about the US role in promoting democracy around the world, but why does it seem that the US government only recognizes elections as free and fair when the US-favored candidate wins?
 
At West Point the president announced a new five billion dollar “counterterrorism partnership,” with much of the money going to continue supporting the rebels in Syria. Though the administration claims it only supports moderate rebels in Syria, it has refused to explain exactly which fighting groups it considers “moderate.” In fact it is known that the weapons sent to “moderates” in Syria often end up in the hands of the radicals. This five billion dollars – stolen from US taxpayers and borrowed from China – will guarantee a prolongation of the war in Syria.
 
There is much to disappoint in Obama’s big foreign policy speech. It represents a continuation of the policy of “do what we say and we will subsidize you, disobey us and we will bomb you.” That approach is a failure, but the neocons who back it show no sign of falling out of favor.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

We should just stay out of other countries´ business, and take care of our own.  Plenty to do here (and, importantly, NOT do here).

Reference Variable's picture

We won't have a choice in a few years.

Boris Alatovkrap's picture

Okay, sure, maybe narcissistic sycophant politician and compliant perpetually uncurious population is complicit, but remember... all war is bankster war.

Jayda1850's picture

Unless it's war ON the banksters. That hope alone gets me through these insane times.

Anusocracy's picture

Bankster war without government, highly unlikely, but bankster war through government, quite likely.

The problem has always been the existence of government.

Jayda1850's picture

Bankster war through government is much more unlikely. Government is owned by the banksters, they will never strike a blow against their paymasters. You start offing some of these high profile bankers and putting the fear of God in them, things will change. Take every case to trial and use the crimes of the major banks as a defense and justification. The people are tired of this shit. I'd gladly trust my life in the hands of 12 of my peers for killing a piece of shit like corzine. I'm truly conflicted on advocating violence against fellow human beings, but I've reached the point where I have no faith that anyone will be held to account. I was told this is not good thinking and that these people will get what they deserve in the afterlife, but the more of this shit I see, the less I believe in a God that would allow this. One way or another I hope a reckoning is coming.

Anusocracy's picture

Government is the tool that banksters use for war.

Without government, banksters would have to raise their own armies to fight wars.

Would you fight for Goldman Sachs in the Goldman Sachs Army? Lots of people are fighting for Goldman Sachs in the US Army.

COSMOS's picture

I am surprised Bibi Nutinyahoo didnt give the commencement speech for the West Point grads instead of Obamma.  Bibi has a better idea where these graduates will be fighting next before anyone else in the Executive Branch chain of command.

redpill's picture

Carry a gun in Syria and you are a moderate and supported by the US government.

 

Carry a gun in the U.S. and you are a radical and you are demonized by the US government.

 

 

simplejack's picture

 

presidents words don't match actions?  

 

is this new?

Son of Captain Nemo's picture

"presidents words don't match actions?

is this new?"

+100

No but it goes without saying that "critical thinking skills" and "indifference" to the plight of others we blatantly destroy and make suffer is in it's worst drought of this Country's history!


dontgoforit's picture

Obama, it seems to me, has always said one thing then done the other.  Habitual liar, or freakishly clever - he does seem to get away with it.

Anusocracy's picture

Just like all the previous presidents.

Stoploss's picture

"more people live under elected governments today than at any time in human history.”

 

Rigged elections Barry. 

Rigged elections.

 

Rigged elections keep the WAR RACKET ALIVE AND WELL............

Anusocracy's picture

Living under elected governments just means being unfree under elected governments

Instead of some other kind.

NOTaREALmerican's picture

Ron Paul,  just another pinko hippy who hates everything that made Merica great, and the troops.

foxenburg's picture

Obama certainly is an exceptional idiot.

q99x2's picture

Impeach Obama. The nation and world does best when those fuckers are in gridlock.

Four chan's picture

ron paul who lives by his beliefs and words, sees the inconsistencies in obama precisely because ron paul is not conflicted, sold out, or a manchurian candidate.

NOTaREALmerican's picture

Which also explains why he can't get anywhere in politics.

The purpose of politics is to provide a forum where the smart-n-savvy people can manipulate the dumbasses with bullshit for fun and profit.

RP kinda throws a wrench in the entire operation, which is why the adults who run the country make the children laugh at him.

Anusocracy's picture

The so-called "smart-n-savvy" people use cultural pheromones - morality - to manipulate the masses. Insects use scents, but they use moral indignation.

A better name for them is "psychopath".

JustObserving's picture

The Nobel Peace Prize winner has fixed up Syria, Libya and Afghanistan.  He is busy fixing Ukraine when he is not on a golf course.

Forward

The Axe's picture

Iraq is going to fall  again...did anyone think that would happen yesterday.....SHIT    those clowns just drop their uniforms and return home to fuck their goats.   just a manner of time....yet the computers and the NY Fed just buy equites ....fucking funny

NOTaREALmerican's picture

Those Weapons of Mass Delusion are buried someplace! 

i_call_you_my_base's picture

Right behind the flowers and candies.

earnyermoney's picture

Notice what's going on in Libya. Gen. Hiftler is trying to impose his will on the "militants". Turns out the CIA trained him to overthrow QDaddy back in the 80s. Now the CIA is trying to install another strongman. Burning down the house.

franzpick's picture

"disobey us and we will bomb you."

Derived from a 'policy' begun in Germany in 1933.

BlussMann's picture

More like Churchill and Roosevelt in 1944

SheepDog-One's picture

What? OBlahBlah is just a big bullshitter? No way!

insanelysane's picture

We need to take guns away from people to make the world a safer place; except when we are arming people in Egypt, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan....to the hilt.

-O

Dr. Engali's picture

"President Obama’s spoke at length about the US role in promoting democracy around the world, but why does it seem that the US government only recognizes elections as free and fair when the US-favored candidate wins?"

Why? Because the U.S only backs candidates who will help support the central bank and the petro-dollar. Any other reason outside of that is pure bullshit.

lindaamick's picture

WOW.  Ron Paul is EXACTLY accurate in his descriptions of US Foreign Policy.

Bravo.  I hope his internet site gets alot of traffic. 

p00k1e's picture

Ron Paul scrubbing for political donations.  

His words made donors feel happy. 

Blues Traveler's picture

ilumininating comment by you, two trolls fucking

alexcojones's picture

My 29 year-old Toyota carries a Ron Paul, President, 2020. 

When I get ahead of RINOs in OC County or Libocrites in LA County, it is always fun. 

I slow down a lot.

 

lasvegaspersona's picture

does anyone here know if we still have a 'foreign policy' thingy...or do we just make shit up every single day?

I am actually really confused. Our bad guys (alQ in Syria) who we were hoping would kill the other guys bad guys in Syria are now taking over Iraq, a place we recently liberated at the cost of 5k American lives?

So why did we fight in Iraq...I know someone here smarter than me can explain this...George...Barry?..Yes Mr Kerry you had your hand up...

Democratic koolaid's picture

Jonh Kerr y had a facelift, that much is true.

LetThemEatRand's picture

What could make it any more clear that Obama is carrying the mantle of the neo-cons than his "liberal" use of the phrase "American exceptionalism."

NOTaREALmerican's picture

Not sure any other option is available.    Seems to be human nature to want more power for your slow motion eagle and flag.   And the smart-n-savvy people running societies didn't get to the positions they are in by not wanting more power. 

samsara's picture

Best President America Never Had.

p00k1e's picture

RP has been in politics for almost 40 years.

Quick, what are his top 10 achievements besides the Ron Paul Peace and Prosperity Institute?  

samsara's picture

Probably his affect on millions of people who never thought about the things he talks about.  The number of young people on college campuses.   The articles he has written and that are on the web for anyone to read. 

But,  that effect would probably be invisible to you...

p00k1e's picture

We all know the abstract, "Ron Paul makes me feel good".  

The audience is looking for something tangible like, “Ron Paul sponsored this piece of legislation which was passed on this date.  As a result of this piece of legislation the consequences were.”

People who praise RP should be able to blurt out at least four outstanding achievements – one for each decade Paul’s been in politics.  

For example, “I liked when George Bush was in office.  He sent me a $500.00 rebate check.  That was nice.”

teslaberry's picture

+1 ghehghis khan would have approved of ron paul

-1 gk would have disapproved of rp