Supreme Court Ruling Sparks Argentine Bond Rout

Tyler Durden's picture

The years-long court battle over Argentina's sovereign debt default appears to have ended... badly for Argentina (and apparently well for Elliott Management). As WSJ reports, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Argentina's appeal (and mutually assured destruction threats that it "could trigger a renewed economic catastrophe with severe consequences for millions of ordinary Argentine citizens") leaving in place a lower-court ruling that said Argentina can't make payments on its restructured debt unless it also pays holdout hedge funds that refused to accept the country's debt-restructuring offers. Argentine USD bonds are down 10 points on the news ahead of President Cristina Fernandez addressing the nation at 9pm local time.


Via WSJ,

It all started in a familiar fashion: a sovereign default:

Argentina defaulted on about $100 billion of its debt during its financial crisis. The country in 2005 and 2010 offered holders of the defaulted bonds new heavily discounted debt in exchange. Between the two swaps, investors agreed to exchange about 93% of the defaulted bonds.

But some funds held out.

The holdouts include Aurelius Capital Management and Elliott Management Corp. affiliate NML Capital Ltd. Argentina owes the holdouts in the current case more than $1.3 billion in principal and interest.

And after winning and losing assorted appelate level decisions, took the case to the Supreme court.

The hedge funds had urged the court to reject Argentina's appeal, saying the country had far overstated the financial impact of the case and has the money to pay up. They also said the Argentine government has a history of mistreating creditors and didn't deserve Supreme Court review because it will disobey the U.S. court rulings if it ultimately loses.

Which finally made a decision moments ago.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Argentina's appeal in a high-stakes case stemming from its historic 2001 default, a major blow for the country in its lengthy battle with holdout creditors.


The court, without comment, left in place a lower-court ruling that said Argentina can't make payments on its restructured debt unless it also pays holdout hedge funds that refused to accept the country's debt-restructuring offers.


The Second Circuit rejected Argentina's "blanket assertion" that a ruling against the country would plunge it into a new economic crisis.

The Supreme Court refused to disturb those rulings, saying in a brief written order that it would not consider Argentina's appeal.

Argentina warned of the consequences.

Argentina had warned the Supreme Court that the lower-court ruling left it facing the possibility of a new, court-ordered default, "which could trigger a renewed economic catastrophe with severe consequences for millions of ordinary Argentine citizens."


The country also said the rulings threatened international credit markets and impeded the debt-restructuring process.

And perhaps that is the sabre the nation's President will rattle tonight?


Of course, now we have to see what the consequences of Argentina ignoring this decision are. Worst case, maybe Greece will simply buy whatever bonds Argentina will issue, using cash derived from repoing new Greek bond issuances with the ECB.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
ShrNfr's picture


john39's picture

its amazing how much shit can hit the fan without causing a shit storm.

Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

just default already

That means the politicians would be admitting a past mistake. Never!

Son of Loki's picture

Gee, the Argentina Supreme Court held the opposite view.

pods's picture

Next some sort of privatization deal will have to be reached to settle these bonds. 
All by the playbook, same as it ever was.

Confessions of an Economic Hitman told me so.


dontgoforit's picture

Sell 'em to da' Fed - they'll buy anything.

DoChenRollingBearing's picture

It's all George Bush's fault.

Kirchner told me so herself.

Calmyourself's picture

Have you not learned, laws are for the little people, not your masters.

Grande Tetons's picture

The problem is that the fan/market is unplugged and the blades/fundamentals have no purpose. So, what we have is a metal box/economy with shit/shit all over it. 

DaveyJones's picture

Shhh, the news could affect his game

DaveyJones's picture

depends on which game we're talking about

Freddie's picture

Oopps!  Kyle Bass took a hit here. He thought Argentina would win this case.  Foolish because the hdge funds/banksters own the courts.  His analysis of Argentina may still be sound because the TX fracking boys will be going in.

dontgoforit's picture

They need a cabal of 34 central banks to 'privately' buy up all their near worthless paper.

JLee2027's picture

Argentina hasn't paid, isn't paying, impact in the long term, zero.

Confundido's picture

The fact that Argentina was treated as a special case, tells me that when other sovereigns default in the near future, other hold outs will aslo be treated as a special case. The corollary is therefore: Your gold will not be safe unless you can touch it.

BurningFuld's picture

Stupid is as stupid does. Who would lend Argentina money? Then even funnier...try to get it back.

kridkrid's picture

Who would lend them money? People who can create money out of nothing and people awash with said money who are looking for place to park it. The same people who buy treasuries knowing full well that this shitstorm will collapse at some point as well. It's all a game of pretend... until it's not... which seems to be inching ever closer. Currency wars lead to trade wars lead to world wars.

DaveyJones's picture

and the string pullers know this progression

Son of Loki's picture

kridkrid, Bankers get huge bonuses and commissions when they "create" loans. That's their only goal without a worry if the debt will ever be paid since they will be in a different job or bank by the time the debtor defaults. The money was long ago pocketed by the loan officer without a care. The losses are passed on to shareholders or some other Suckers.

soontobeblocked's picture

Q. "Who would lend Argentina money?"

A.  Investors who know that one way or another they will see the principal returned with interest.

Your question was also asked in the early 90's w/ re to MEX.  'Who in their right mind would lend money to MEX - even when the interest rate is well above market rate?'

The answer then was Citibank and the Squid because the US taxpayer bailed out MEX in 1994 courtesy of Robert Rubinsteinbergman (who cohencidentally had immense ties to Citi and GS).  MEX received $50 BILLION (a lot of money in 1994) from US, IMF/US, BIS/US, and a token billion from CAN.

As usual the US taxpayer paid for longer and stronger tentacles for the Squid, and does anyone remember Bob's huge signing bonus for joining Citi (SOONER than was allowed by law)? 

Rubin's answer to the criticism from all quarter's was, "Fuck you.  It's my money."  Er, no, Bob, it's our money.  He needed a piece of lead in his skull then as much much as he needs one now.

Gaius Frakkin' Baltar's picture

Argentina could default every year and there'd still be enough dumb money willing to lend to them... Why should they pay anything?

fonzannoon's picture

Is this considered dumb money?

“There’s huge opportunity in these bonds,” said Bass, who manages about $2 billion for Dallas-based Hayman Capital Management LP. “I know you can’t see that today, but today’s the time to be thinking about it.”

Freddie's picture

Kyle's most recent video on youtube has him pimping Argie bonds.  He said the Texas boys are going to go in and frack plus "the crazy woman" will be leaving office soon.    He also thought Argentina would win this lawsuit. 

KnuckleDragger-X's picture

And pimping is the proper word...

kchrisc's picture

Is it not really that foreigners "print" dollars and use those to buy the Argentinean people by way of their criminal government and Rothschild bank?!

Shad_ow's picture

Endless supply, with no personal risk, afterall the taxpaers will foot the bill.

CitizenPete's picture

FDIC Releases Proposed Rulemaking to Amend Annual Stress Test Rule

June 16, 2014
Media Contact
Andrew Gray (202) 898-7192


WASHINGTON — The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) today announced it is seeking comment on a notice of proposed rulemaking amending the FDIC's Annual Stress Test rule. The FDIC's NPR follows similar action by the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency on June 12.
This proposed rule would shift back the timing of the annual stress testing cycle by approximately 90 days, and clarify that institutions covered by the Annual Stress Test rule will not have to calculate their regulatory capital ratios using the Basel III advanced approaches until the stress testing cycle beginning on January 1, 2016.
The public comment period closes 60 days from publication in the Federal Register. Publication of the proposal in the Federal Register is expected shortly.

Quinvarius's picture

Argentina should just place the payments to US debt holders in Argentine bank accounts where the money can be picked up at will, and do what they want.  They have no need of a US supreme court ruling.  And those hedge funds hold that defaulted paper can go pound sand.  This is how the debt market operates.  You make bad decisions and you don't get paid.  You bought worthless defaulted paper.

youngman's picture

What is have to pay back what you owe...who would of thought that...that is old school econ 101...we dont do that today

Duffy Duck's picture

The court has made its decision, now let them enforce it.

thatthingcanfly's picture

Wish we could get Old Hickory back for the 2016 election.

NoWayJose's picture

Why in the world is the US Supreme Court telling Argentina what is can or cannot do?

machineh's picture

Valid question. It's because Argentina voluntarily chose (as numerous other foreign sovereigns have done) to issue its bonds under New York law.

Argentina can and does issue bonds subject to local law. They pay interest rates of about 24%, reflecting the regular expropriations of foreigners under local legislation. Unlike Argentine courts, New York courts aren't Peronist cronies.

By the way, where is TNTARG, the Kirchner mouthpiece who used to post here about the Peronist workers paradise? Probably her check bounced.

Monty Burns's picture

Unlike Argentine courts, New York courts aren't Peronist cronies.


Agreed. But they are cronies of the Wall St. banksters.

kellycriterion's picture

Now of course Jose you know that Argentina took the money it "borrowed" and exchanged it for real stuff. A huge component in that real stuff is human labor.

So why should the Argentina political class be forced to give some of value in exchange for something of value. Jose has no problem working for them for free.

But Jose is probably indignant about this income inequality trend. It's probably the fault of rich guys like Eliot Mgt.

Cognitive Dissonance's picture

But....but....but what about the old GM bond holders who got stiff-armed by all parties involved.....including the US 'Justice' system?

Almost Solvent's picture

Chyrsler & GM bondholders folded their "liquidation" hand for the government's free money hand. 


Don't bring a penknife (GM Bondholders) to a bazooka (US Gov) fight.


Look around the poker table, if you can't see the sucker, you're it.

FishHockers's picture

Racist decision I tell you.

MFL8240's picture

Shocked to see the Supreme Court voted in favor of their own country!

insanelysane's picture

It's an election year so the lefties are bringing it a little bit back to center.  The rightie elite would like to move a little back to center too but the minions don't seem to be seeing it that way.

Uncle Remus's picture

Cristina Fernandez, in couched diplo-speak: "Fuck the US. Care for a sopaipilla?"

insanelysane's picture

If you look at the history of this, everyone was supposed to restructure because we're all equal citizens of the world except for the IMF, whose employees pay no taxes to any country in the world.  The IMF was paid back in full.

highly debtful's picture

Pity. It's a beautiful country, at least up north - I've never been to the south. We visited the country back in 2008 and I very much liked the people over there. But my brother in law, who lives in Paraguay since 1989, told me there and then that the country was doomed because Cristina was a complete crackpot who wouldn't recognize a sound economic policy if you'd serve it to her with the finest Beluga caviar and a bottle of Torrontés.

Turns out he was right 6 years ago. Unfortunately, because the country has a lot going for it, IMO. 

machineh's picture

Argentina's next presidential election is in Oct. 2015, and the widow K. (a great pal of Hugo Chavez and the Castro brothers) can't run.

Unfortunately, nearly all the prospective candidates are Peronists (just as all of our U.S. candidates are Depublicrats).

So it will be a miracle if anything ever changes, in a country addicted to statism and dirigisme.

Surely if we just add a few more regulations, things will get better! /sarc