This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Real "Wealth Effect"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

When the masses just won't play along and BTFATH (with only central banks buying), the real 'wealth' transfer is much more insidious (and more voting)...

 

 

H/t @Not_Jim_Cramer

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 06/17/2014 - 17:57 | 4866942 RaceToTheBottom
RaceToTheBottom's picture

Food stamps are an opiate for the masses and a mind deadening agent.  

It is not really a wealth transfer vehicle.

It is more effective as an anti revolution drug, with strong behavioral side effects.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 17:58 | 4866955 TeamDepends
TeamDepends's picture

You are so wrong about the wealth transfer part!  But when you speak of the mind deadening brother, you has hits the bullseye!

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:04 | 4866980 gh0atrider
gh0atrider's picture

"The Book of Satoshi" is now available on amazon.com!  This is a must have for any real Zerohedge library!

 

BUY NOW!!!

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0996061312/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=17...

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:13 | 4867016 Xibalba
Xibalba's picture

You ever see what the EBT card holders are allowed to buy?!?!  It's the most poisonous food and drink on the Planet!  The elites LOVE the fact that more of the population will die due to 'poor diet'. 

This is all going according to plan

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:23 | 4867049 max2205
max2205's picture

Legalize pot and it'll be years before they figure it out

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:08 | 4867178 linniepar
linniepar's picture

This is not the chart you are looking for. *hand wave*

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:53 | 4867317 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

Ca you use your welfare credit card to purchase pot?

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:54 | 4867319 MathWins
MathWins's picture

I've seen a person with an EBT card buy a lot of pop at a gas station, the person goes outside and dumps it all, turns around and goes back into the gas station to redeem the cans for the 10 cents per can that Michigan mandates, and they bought cigarettes. 

Why the hell can you buy pop with an EBT card in the first place?  Our tax dollars at work.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 20:53 | 4867456 Xibalba
Xibalba's picture

Corporate welfare

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:45 | 4867297 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

Welfare is always a triple-theft: The victims are those robbed to fund welfare, the recipients by way of stolen economic opportunities and the recipients again of their souls.

 

“Confucius say look deeper into the mud and see the thieves and not the receivers.”

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 20:20 | 4867379 WhackoWarner
WhackoWarner's picture

Is gov subsidy ever justified?

What about the children living in poverty who cannot be held to blame for any dynamic that puts them there?  Solution anyone?

Wed, 06/18/2014 - 00:11 | 4867489 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

"What about the children living in poverty who cannot be held to blame for any dynamic that puts them there?  Solution anyone?"

The government causes this by way of their theft and murder and then proclaims that more theft is the answer.

 

In the economic sphere an act, a habit, an institution, a law produces not only one effect, but a series of effects. Of these effects, the first alone is immediate; it appears simultaneously with its cause; it is seen. The other effects emerge only subsequently; they are not seen; we are fortunate if we foresee them. ----------- Bastiat

 

"Is gov subsidy ever justified?"

The question is, always is, is theft ever justified?! Because welfare IS theft. The clear answer is no. The clearer answer by way of looking around at where the DC US occupied American country stands today is an emphatic no.

No; invoking your principle, every class came bursting into the National Assembly to make of the law an instrument of plunder. People demanded a progressive income tax, interest-free credit, the right to employment, the right to relief, guaranteed interest, a minimum wage, education free of charge, capital advances to industry, etc., etc. In short, everyone wanted to live and to develop at the expense of others.----------- Bastiat

 

Bastiat source: http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basEss1.html

 

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 22:05 | 4867623 litemine
litemine's picture

Also you left out the (Admini"strait"ers)..........Too big to audit/fail/jail........

Straight into their personal accounts.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 17:59 | 4866957 ajax
ajax's picture

 

 

That chart makes me hungry.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:00 | 4866963 Goldilocks
Goldilocks's picture

"You've made your bed, now lie in it."

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 22:01 | 4867611 litemine
litemine's picture

That's it... How warm will you be when all you have is a Flag to wrap around your shoulders in the winter?

 

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:01 | 4866972 Soul Glow
Soul Glow's picture

The rich have stocks and the poor food stamps.  Who wins when millions barely get by and the others buy new cars.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:06 | 4866987 economics9698
economics9698's picture

The bankers?

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:09 | 4867000 Soul Glow
Soul Glow's picture

Tuche

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:24 | 4867050 Robinhood
Robinhood's picture

New cars? How about multiple mega yachts, multiple mansions, jets, etc. New cars is a fucking joke.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:25 | 4867058 shovelhead
shovelhead's picture

The food stamp people can buy the used cars and upgrade their homes.

Used leather seats are still leather seats.

Gotta look at the bright side.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:04 | 4866981 Rainman
Rainman's picture

damn...that's some bottle rocket skim growth for the JP Morgue !

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:06 | 4866986 Tenshin Headache
Tenshin Headache's picture

Which definition of wealth are you using? If you need food stamps, you are not going to be spending much time at the yacht club.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:13 | 4867012 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

There's gotta be a number here.

"Everyone gets a hundred bucks" or something.
All the Muslims are on the payroll...it's time for all the Americans to "get that program too."

That's what happens when your CIA attacks your State Department.

"The Program just got a lot bigger."

Democracy. Freedom. AND STUFF!

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:20 | 4867038 starman
starman's picture

Hm looks like the 1973 oil crisis started somethig nasty, but this time it will be different your fhurer promised you that. This is also the time when US firms started to go to asia to manufacture! Long live the USSA.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:31 | 4867072 shovelhead
shovelhead's picture

Now this looks like a very successful Govt. program that has gained wide acceptance with the voters.

Let's hope we have the same success with the SS disability payments.

Yes We Can.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:32 | 4867077 DGS blog
DGS blog's picture

 

BANKER IMMUNITY My conclusion why you pay for Bankers crimes :

I contend that Big Banks have De Facto Immunity for crimes, foreign and domestic, in exchange assisting the US Treasury enforce US Global Financial policies. The Banks can get away with murder, maybe literally, in a modern example of “Quid pro Quo”(This for That) where upper Bank personnel are safe from fines and jail time. The Bankers know they will not go to jail, or, as a worst case, the Bank will be fined, and it treated as a cost of doing business, ultimately paid for by all of us. My reading tells me that no upper level employees ever missed a bonus let alone a conviction with punishment.

 

I think a clear picture of the problem emerged in the UK Telegraph's article on April 16th, 2014

US FINANCIAL SHOWDOWN WITH RUSSIA MORE DANGEROUS THAT IT LOOKS”. by Ambrose Evans-Prichard on April 16, quoted in Newsweek: “The Treasury has deputized the entire US financial system to achieve its foreign policy goals”. Based on the recent book “TREASURY's WAR” by Juan Zarate, former White House and Treasury Official, US Prosecutor, outlines the nature of the global nature of the effects of Sec 311 of the Patriot Act, designating countries, organizations and individuals as money-launders.

 

Thus the banks are the enforcement muscle (much like the Mob) of Treasury's overseas activities. Several White House Peer Review papers suggest that these enforcement duties should remain Treasury functions. In Treasury's desire to protect the US and extend the “Anaconda Strategy” developed by the North, while fighting the South in the Civil war, they can designate a country, bank or individual as a “Money Laundering Center”, with which everyone involved with them, upstream or down, is then declared OUTLAW, 'persona non gratis', and more radioactive than Fukishima. No one, for fear of being barred from the lucrative capital markets of New York City, will deal with them. Their lifeblood, cash flow, stops. Without JPM, BOA, CITI, Goldman, and Morgan Stanley, little money can be raised until other capital centers develop.

That was a practical reason as well as symbolic reason the “911” attackers targeted New York and the Twin Towers.

It is the beating heart of Global capital markets.

 

All of us know the “Systemically Important” Entities, critical to US Global Strategy. Americans and people globally, are aware of the legion of unprosecuted crimes committed by Big Banks. But when Banks break laws with impunity due to their De Facto immunity, a serious moral hazard exists. Other bank executives are emboldened to new heights of criminal activity and this creates more “unindicted co-conspirators”. I believe this is unconstitutional, bad practice, bad policy for the USA, and that it will have terrible long term consequences, already showing in the huge loss of respect for the USA's integrity and Rule of Law.

 

Contrast that NY Times notes that there were eight hundred forty-nine (849) convictions after the “Keating” Savings and Loan Scandal in the '90s, and but only one (1) conviction since this meltdown began in 2006, and that was an Egyptian born Credit Suisse employee. None of the so-called TBTF bank personnel were imprisoned. I don't think these banks are “Too Big To Fail,” however they are “Systemically Important” Entities. These Banks are not allowed to fail as they are the Muscle for US Global Financial Policies. US Treasury Anaconda Strategy cutting off cashflow, to entities they designate as “Primary Money Laundering Centers”, is an effective short term tactic, with serious negative long term strategic implications for the USA. De Facto immunity for Big Banks, has the current situation spinning out of control, a loose cannon on a stormy deck, injuring friend and foe. The people of the US deserve a respected Rule of Law, not one for Banks, and one for Others. Injuries by Banker Crimes are legion, from false home repossessions, to usury, to front running trades and rigging markets for their no-brainer profit trades. Do any readers NOT know someone so injured? Does anyone know anyone sent to jail for these crimes ? The very fabric of our society is being rent asunder for Banker profits.

 

Of course the proof that my contentions here are wrong, would be the vigorous prosecutions of those banks whose crimes have not passed the statute of limitations. The old Populist slogan addressing low corn prices was : “Raise more HELL, and less corn”; which may be metaphorically is the solution here. First it is clear the Big Banks and the Treasury that is supposed to regulate them, must be separated, and the Banks and Bankers prosecuted for their crimes including jail time. Having Treasury depend on the Banks to enforce their rules, looks unconstitutionally incestuous to me, without checks and balances. An oligarchic state is ruled by Banks and other large interests, a Republic or a Representative Democracy is not.

 

What happens next is critical in determining who rules. Restore Treasury enforcement of its regulations, foreign and domestic. Impose Real Regulation of the Banks and Financial Sector. Prosecute Bank Crime and adjudicate Jail Sentences upon the guilty, not just fines. The US may be feared, but not respected. That could turn to contempt and tends to weaken the US Dollar in value and in status as a Reserve Currency. Myriad challenges to the US DOLLAR as a Reserve Currency are in progress as we read this, and actually putting our Financial Sector back under the Rule of Law, may seriously retard, diffuse and deflect some of these challenges.

 

DENALIGUIDE, June 15, 2014 http://www.denaliguidesummit.blogspot.ca/

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 22:33 | 4867709 RaceToTheBottom
RaceToTheBottom's picture

849 times more convictions in the S&L Crisis VS NONE now.

That is the crux of the matter.

Soon People will not stand for that.

Funny when the latest financial theft occured, WS Banksters were screaming for NYC Police to serve them as their drivers waited to take them home.  They knew eventually the public would smarten up.

Maybe now is the time?

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:33 | 4867082 armageddon addahere
armageddon addahere's picture

The food stamp crowd often has new cars. Nothing down, EZ qualifying no interest, low payments. Got to move those units off the lot.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 18:58 | 4867148 strangeglove
strangeglove's picture

Divide and concur Bitchez" divide and concur!

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:08 | 4867179 Rockfish
Rockfish's picture

Frito - Lay 

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:19 | 4867206 AdvancingTime
AdvancingTime's picture

I live in the State of Indiana where those on food stamps are given a "Indiana Works" card that looks like a credit card. This card is to spare recipients much of the embarrassment of receiving aid or being on the dole. Many Americans are appalled at the mix of high priced and unhealthy foods our tax dollars are used to buy through this program.

People buy these foods to fulfill their "appetite", it has gone far beyond just keeping people from going hungry. It is one thing to let people starve, but how do you justify qualifying someone on government assistance to purchase items that hard working taxpayers often feel unable to afford? More on this subject in the article below.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2012/01/food-stamp-reform-needed.html

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:23 | 4867212 Jstanley011
Jstanley011's picture

Somehow or other, I've got a hankerin' for a five-pound block of American cheese. Either that, or a 24-can carton of Cheeze Whiz. I can't decide...

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 19:53 | 4867318 Georgia_Boy
Georgia_Boy's picture

So if retail investors are either spooked or treading financial water, and thus selling, and its all being bought up by the central banks and the companies themselves, basically we are slowly becoming an oligopoly, right? If the trend holds long enough into the future (I know), whoever is tight with the central bank, eventually owns everything.

The lesson the liberal sheep won't face up to: centrally planned economies are easier to corrupt.

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 20:09 | 4867354 honestann
honestann's picture

Wow.  Now that is one illuminating chart.

Vote buying, anyone?

Tue, 06/17/2014 - 23:49 | 4867903 Hohum
Hohum's picture

https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/stats/historicalbakkenoilstats.pdf

 

The WTI price is lower than the highest marginal cost of producing oil.  Cue Don Meredith...turn out the lights, the party's over.
"Wealth effect" is all we got.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!