This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Dark Secrets and Ironies of Communists and Communism
The finance and economic literary worlds appear to be going through a kind of Marxist craze. Among other things, this crowd is lecturing the world on how capitalism is to blame for the world’s problems.
It’s pretty staggering when you consider that:
1) There is literally no example in history in which Marxism or Communism successfully increased wealth or standards of wellbeing.
2) There is literally no example in the natural world in which Marxism exists.
The biggest monsters in history were Marxists or Communists. Chairman Mao was not a champion of the people. He was a power-crazed, ignorant monster responsible for the death of 60 million people.
You could literally kill EVERY human being in the states of California and New York and STILL not measure up to Mao’s track record. Millions of people were enslaved both literally and spiritually by this man.
Then of course there is Stalin who oversaw the death of some 40 MILLION people due to his misguided and evil policies. People literally starved to death because of this monster of a human being.
Marxism and communism don’t work. They are totally contrary to human nature and basic human rights. The worst human rights offenders in history were communists. In fact, every example of Marxism in history shows that it had to be FORCED on people.
Heck, Marx himself was so unpopular during his lifetime that when he died only SEVEN people attended the funeral.
Marx, for all his rhetoric on the working class, never started a single business or created a single job in his life. He didn’t work. He just sat around and wrote books about things he never experienced in first person. Four of his seven children died as a direct result of poverty from his failure to provide for his family.
This is not conjecture; Marx knew his life choices directly contributed to his family’s suffering and the death of his children.
Guess who footed the bill for Marx’s moronic aspirations? A worker: someone who gave up his hopes of being a writer because it didn’t pay and went to work in the private sector. Marx’s writings were LITERALLY funded by the private sector.
This is the man revered by communists around the world: someone who let his family starve and die rather than get out of his seat and get a job. A man who literally lived off of others … while writing on and on about worker’s rights.
This is someone we’re supposed to admire and study? This is the man who came up with theories that would make the world a better place?
Give me a break.
Phoenix Capital Research
- advertisements -
Welcome to the internet! 100 miles wide and 2 inches deep.
I'd rather be dead than slaving under the lies of crony capitalism .
You are dead and you are under "ISM".
yay go jew power!
Rasputin was the 'advisor' to the last russian tsar.
He spent his time helping the Jewish population which lived in ghettosor were forced to leave Russia.
Karl Marx was responsible for the communist ideal.
He was raised by affluent Jews.
Here's some fun Quotes:
VLADIMIR, LENIN, Founder of Bolshevik Communist (From an article in Northern Pravda, October-December 1913, qouted in Lenin on the Jewish Question, page 10)
JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316)
NOW LEARN YOU STUPID GOYIM, LEARN!
MOAR QUOTES:
H. H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937
HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real "Crime," page 6
ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937 "There is nothing else in Communism - a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a "paradise on earth."
LEARN YOU DUMB WORTHLESS CHATTLE!
Blah, blah. Old memes.
Capitalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism.
They've all been put in a blender and whipped up with some sugar.
Now they tell you that you mustn't drink Communism, or Capitalism, or Fascism - so you'll drink them all mixed together - and be distracted so the banksters of every crede but united in their lust can bend us over.
End Central Banking and the pilfery of public treasuries.
Hang the mammon lusters.
Sound money.
Rule of law.
Why do you deride those you would convert fishbot?
Sometimes derision is all they respond to. Sometimes it takes, a little tap on the head to get the circuits to line up.
Also I'm not too sure I like them LOL. But I ahte jews more. I got lots of love, just not for goyim and jews :) God's flood in 3, 2, 1...
Plus you never know, maybe they actually look up what goyim and chattle means lol, the u is fucked :(
AHHHHHH :D
I'm going to convert to Judaism so that I may legally squash insects like you.
KArl MArx: born Morechai Mose Levi.
Viktoria Nuland: her father's name: NUdelman
Born Uljanov, passed away as Lenin: his grandfather: Israel Alexandrovic Mosko Blank.
John Kerry: father born as Kohn.
Funny people, those jewish murders, why do they change their names always?
I don't know, maybe because every east of the Urals pig named Jano was terrorizing Jews for the past 18 plus centuries.
«Funny people, those jewish murders(sic), why do they change their names always?»
Something like atavistic reverse psychology...you change your name to try and avoid age old persecution, forced exile and death ( supposedly), then turn around with that shiny new moniker and go on killing sprees of epic proportions..... funny humans....
FWIW...When I say «supposedly», I'm not implying there were no persecutions, expulsions, pogroms and whatnot - although gradually 'spinned' out of orbit by the original spinmeisters themselves - but that we fail to analyse the root causes of this troubled history...a people cannot be targeted for expulsion more than a hundred times without there being reasons.....
Ironically, it was early Christianity that created the Jewish archetype of money lender/banker by forbidding Christians to engage in usury and restricting Jewish entry to the guilds, military, academia and the professions. With no other options, jews became lenders, merchants and shop owners.
Every once in a while, when Christian rulers got too far into debt fighting their incessant internecine wars, the jews were expelled, or killed, their property stolen and the debts owed to them repudiated.
Payback's a MF'er, ain't ti?
See also, Richard I.
Its all fun and games with the "crown" ie government...collecting very high taxes from Jews in the black market lending practices of the day, on a whim (just cuz government needed it at the time, from them) and no thought given as those taxes were collected (essentially) from the people who had to engage in what can only be described as loan sharking.
Yes, it all worked profitably well for both, until it didn't ;-)
Go fuck yourself.
shut you worthless shithole jew cunt
JK I love you! ;)
We'll have recommend you for a psy eval if you don't get your mind right. Ok Buby?
What name was Mao & Stalin born with? ;-)
Mao am not aware, that he has changed his name...., Stalin was born as Jugasvili or Dzugasvili, Jozef Visarionovic.
His ancestors should come to Gergia from Portugal.
Rasputin was the 'advisor' to the last russian tsar - just before the communists took over.
Aside from pretending to be magical, He spent his time helping the Jewish population which lived in ghettosor were forced to leave Russia.
Karl Marx was responsible for the communist ideal.
He was raised by affluent Jews.
Here's some fun Quotes:
VLADIMIR, LENIN, Founder of Bolshevik Communist (From an article in Northern Pravda, October-December 1913, qouted in Lenin on the Jewish Question, page 10)
JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316)
"2) There is literally no example in the natural world in which Marxism exists."
Honey Bees.
Most people make the mistake thinking that Communism had anything to do with equality
The reason communism works for bees and ants is that the workers cannot reproduce. If any individual workers left the hive to live on there own, it would be the end the (DNA) line for them, no matter how successful they were while they lived. They can only pass on their genes by helping the hive as a whole.
On another note, I always wondered why the US pupetmasters never complained about communism in Isreal (the kibbutz). When I first read about them, they sounded more like communism to me than anything going on in the USSR
Humans can't seem to live without their Fed Notes - you know, paper with ink on it. The people will kill for paper-and-ink and they will even forget about reproducing once you have reduced them to fools blathering on about ISMS, loaded with GMOs, pesticides, flourides, chlorides, etc... The ones that do manage to reproduce are so eager to get more paper-and-ink that they toss those precious kids into goverment indoctrination camps to rinse and repeat the process. Moral of the story - use Bitcoin.
LOL! MEERKATS!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meerkat
Meerkats demonstrate altruistic behavior within their colonies; one or more meerkats stand sentry, while others are foraging or playing, to warn them of approaching dangers. When a predator is spotted, the meerkat performing as sentry gives a warning bark, and other members of the gang will run and hide in one of the many bolt holes they have spread across their territory. The sentry meerkat is the first to reappear from the burrow and search for predators, constantly barking to keep the others underground. If there is no threat, the sentry meerkat stops signaling and the others feel safe to emerge.
Meerkats also babysit the young in the group. Females that have never produced offspring of their own often lactate to feed the alpha pair's young, while the alpha female is away with the rest of the group. They also protect the young from threats, often endangering their own lives. On warning of danger, the babysitter takes the young underground to safety and is prepared to defend them if the danger follows. If retreating underground is not possible, she collects all young together and lies on top of them.
Meerkats are also known to share their burrow with the Yellow Mongoose and ground squirrel, species with which they do not compete for resources. If they are unlucky, sometimes they share their burrow with snakes.
It takes a village...
see kibuz in Palestina, it is simply a communism society there.
I was visiting Czechoslovakia when the Ruskies came in 68 and therefore somewhat sensitive to their thinking and then from there went to visiting some Kibuz and felt the same thing.
Communism with GM Trucks...
Marx could have been the Econ department chair at the University of Chicago if he were around today.
Maybe not, he would be O's economic advisor. Job czar, that's it.
duo, your prediction is "amusing" because it appears to be too terribly true!
Commies coming to the defense of a navel gazing parasite in 3-2-1...
/////////
K...I'll rephrase, cowardly commies FAILING to defend their hero in now, zero seconds ;-)
Communisim, Marixism, Keynesism - all are just window dressing for the sociopathic human drive to loot, control, and kill.
They provide a smokescreen to cover the theft and destruction.
They do not need to be internally consistent or even make sense logically - the only purpose is to obscure and screen the movments of the looters.
And if the devil himself came to earth you can depend on a significant portion of the population steadfastly supporting him. Uh, wait. He is here and they do.
OMG!! Clarity! And on the internet, no less.
Guards! Seize him!
I dunno, it may be the defenders of "socialism" and those who blame this shit on "capitalism". ;-)
One nitpick with the article- I heard somewhere that The Czechoslovacks voted in communism after WW 2.
not directly.
Communists got a lot of votes, but no majority, they simply puched away the government having the support of the freemason (president) Bensh a big friend of W. Churchil and J.V.Stalin (Jugasvili). Benesh was securing both ways (east and west) and then turned to Stalin finally.
Let me quote STalin (after the 1934 vote fraud in polibyro plenum) it is not important who votes, but who counts the votes.
during that vote, sergej kirov got 297 votes out of 300 and Stalin 3.....
but Lazar Kagan was the one, who turned it completly other way and pronounced the result totally opposite: 297 for Stalin and 3 for Kirov.
Of course until 1938 most of those participating in the plenum have been purged.
I find very little difference between the two (communism/socialism).
The power lies within the state and anyone with eyes can see the authortarian nature of the virus. We can see it here, from the militarization of local police to "progressive" taxation to indoctrination of children in government schools to a stifling regulatory bureaucracy.
I didn't build that ;-)
"The power lies within the state and anyone with eyes can see the authortarian nature of the virus"
Having thus identified the problem, we propose as a solution.... ?
Bearing in mind that:
A: All human endeavor requires cooperation on mutual goals, which as the task advances, requires some division of labor and skills, ie: specialization.
B: Humans, by nature, are self-serving and will always try to place themselves in a position of advantage relative to their peers.
Bit of a dilemma, no? You can't get anything done without A, but as soon as you try, B rears its ugly head.
I'm not seeing where A & B are mutually exclusive or that A + B = C (C being a centralized/top-down government) is needed.
One of the hardest things to get across to "my brothers" to the left of me is, with all their barking about bankers & oligarchs, the Federal Reserve IS THE centralization of credit in the hands of the state & oligarchs.
Thats Communist Manifesto #5.
Now, when I tell them that without it, all their "socialized benefits" disappear into the ether (because the "progressive taxation" scheme-thats Plank #2 by the way-can't support it) I'm accused of wanting to starve women & children.
No, thats not my purpose, not at all.
My purpose has always been to show "them" that they have exactly what they have always wanted but were too stupid to comprehend. And to inform them once again, I am not responsible for or are going to help them clean up their fucking mess.
It has always allowed for war & welfare, without the bother of having to pay for either, that my friend is the trap that "gimme-democracy" has wrought.
They can go on living the lie for a while longer or experience the pain now but either way, the pain is coming and to your point of self interest, I'm prepared and you should be too.
I'll go along with that. My point was simply to illustrate that the state, being comprised of self-seeking individuals, would naturally follow the path of self interest to the detriment of the society as a whole. I hold this to be true of all political systems to one degree or another. Best of intentions aside, someone or some group always gains ascendancy, then uses that power to further their narrow self-interest at the expense of everyone else.
I'm basically with Radical Marijuana on this one. I've burned a lot of mental calories trying to find a work-around, but so far nothing that I can really hang my hat on. Still trying though:)
Ditto for me, ebear: "I've burned a lot of mental calories trying to find a work-around, but so far nothing that I can really hang my hat on. Still trying though:)"
Me and you both.
We're all human, I give my "hold out period" (conservatively of course...lol) at two years before "they" got to me somehow...through exploiting my own weakness(es)...we all have them and have to fight them off constantly in our daily normal lives to do whats right.
There...in the concentration of power...and everyone vying for it and the extension of it...is the problem.
One can actually convince or rationalize to himself/herself that what they're doing, this "something", is for the good of all and still be a self serving parasite collecting their own power unto themselves.
Its very enticing, seductive...this thing called power. It takes special people to control themselves with it and I've never been convinced anyone (including myself) can do it.
///////////
And yes, those are my greens ;-)
I think Marx knew that he was summoning a monster. His early poems show an obsession with Faust, Mephistopheles, and cursing and taking revenge on all of humanity. He also "had that clear Talmudic mind which does not falter at petty difficulties of fact". With these traits he attracted the notice of his wealthy relatives, the Rothschilds. They wanted an economic system they could use as a means of plunder, as one pole of the Hegelian dialectic, and as a weapon against their enemies- especially Russia. He seemed to have foreseen his influence in Russia in 1882 when he triumphantly boasted that “it gives me the satisfaction that I damage a power which, next to England, is the true bulwark of the old society.”
The devil stuff is early in this long article:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03/21/marx-and-freuds-faustian-pacts-a...
Illuminati/Masonic connections and stuff about Marx being financed by his relative Nathan Rothschild:
http://antinewworldorder.blogspot.co.nz/2007/10/who-was-karl-marx.html
Very interesting.
This falls in line with his socialist ideology of supplanting the state as THE religion.
Excellent! I had not seen this, thanks ;-)
Ya interesting. Also interesting - Did you know J.P. Morgan funded Russel T Kates known as the Watchtower society AKA Jehovah's Witnesses?
Morgan was an interesting fellow. Delve deep and you find interesting attempts to invest in science or orgins of species be it god or darwinism. He was a philanthropist at heart but at times could be a real prick.
That said however, I would speculate he would not approve of all of JPM's actions today.
Yes, the world government IS the Beast. Not some dude with horns and a tail. It all fits. And there is most definitely a force of evil which these people plug into.
On the secular level, which is where men who make governments are supposed to reside, yes. Ethics & morals need not come from religion or governments.
They seem pretty standard though, don't steal, don't covet, don't murder, don't abuse ones position etc ;-)
Never ceases to amaze, the brilliance and understanding of men and governments,the authors of our Constitution had.
They knew what men would do. Always. Everywhere. And they did their best to give us the tools to solve the problems.
But ever rapidly now, we as a society ( not all of us) throw away, or give away those tools.
Oh, our Masters , ( and that's what they believe they are) know what we can do when we understand and decide to use the toolbox.
I hope I live long enough to see it, should it happen.
"Never ceases to amaze, the brilliance and understanding of men and governments, the authors of our Constitution had."
Yes, they were not stupid people.
They looked at "democracy" and discarded it immediately. Of course, the tyranny of a monarchial family wasn't right either. They looked at how the state/king can bond with religion and discarded that as well.
But over time de Tocqueville was right, the people discovered they could vote themselves into anothers pocket because it was freeeeee! for them. The president can send drones to kill "his" own citizens without trial. The state can declare a "safety issue" and erect vast bureaucracies to keep us safe by spying on us. The law didn't inhibit them, it was the will of the majority, it was law...not the rule of law...only law.
Well fine, I'm here to be a criminal arsonist under "their law" and burn it to the ground with all the remorse expected of a "hardened criminal".
Those authors were mental giants compared to what passes for learned pols to day, i.e. Clinton. My eyes at times burn w/ tears at reading their essays.
well said. no one with a brain would.