This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Chaos In Iraq Is By DESIGN
Neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz planned regime change in Iraq more than 20 years ago … in 1991.
But the goal wasn’t just regime change (or oil). The goal was to break up the country, and to do away with the sovereignty of Iraq as a separate nation.
The Guardian noted in 2003:
President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt predicted devastating consequences for the Middle East if Iraq is attacked. “We fear a state of disorder and chaos may prevail in the region,” he said.
***
They are probably still splitting their sides with laughter in the Pentagon. But Mr Mubarak and the [Pentagon] hawks do agree on one thing: war with Iraq could spell disaster for several regimes in the Middle East. Mr Mubarak believes that would be bad. The hawks, though, believe it would be good.
For the hawks, disorder and chaos sweeping through the region would not be an unfortunate side-effect of war with Iraq, but a sign that everything is going according to plan.
***
The “skittles theory” of the Middle East – that one ball aimed at Iraq can knock down several regimes – has been around for some time on the wilder fringes of politics but has come to the fore in the United States on the back of the “war against terrorism”.
Its roots can be traced, at least in part, to a paper published in 1996 by an Israeli thinktank, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Entitled “A clean break: a new strategy for securing the realm”, it was intended as a political blueprint for the incoming government of Binyamin Netanyahu. As the title indicates, it advised the right-wing Mr Netanyahu to make a complete break with the past by adopting a strategy “based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism …”
***
The paper set out a plan by which Israel would “shape its strategic environment”, beginning with the removal of Saddam Hussein and the installation of a Hashemite monarchy in Baghdad.
With Saddam out of the way and Iraq thus brought under Jordanian Hashemite influence, Jordan and Turkey would form an axis along with Israel to weaken and “roll back” Syria. Jordan, it suggested, could also sort out Lebanon by “weaning” the Shia Muslim population away from Syria and Iran, and re-establishing their former ties with the Shia in the new Hashemite kingdom of Iraq. “Israel will not only contain its foes; it will transcend them”, the paper concluded.
***
The leader of the “prominent opinion makers” who wrote it was Richard Perle – now chairman of the Defence Policy Board at the Pentagon.
Also among the eight-person team was Douglas Feith, a neo-conservative lawyer, who now holds one of the top four posts at the Pentagon as under-secretary of policy.
***
Two other opinion-makers in the team were David Wurmser and his wife, Meyrav (see US thinktanks give lessons in foreign policy, August 19). Mrs Wurmser was co-founder of Memri, a Washington-based charity that distributes articles translated from Arabic newspapers portraying Arabs in a bad light. After working with Mr Perle at the American Enterprise Institute, David Wurmser is now at the State Department, as a special assistant to John Bolton, the under-secretary for arms control and international security.
A fifth member of the team was James Colbert, of the Washington-based Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Jinsa) – a bastion of neo-conservative hawkery whose advisory board was previously graced by Dick Cheney (now US vice-president), John Bolton and Douglas Feith.
***
With several of the “Clean Break” paper’s authors now holding key positions in Washington, the plan for Israel to “transcend” its foes by reshaping the Middle East looks a good deal more achievable today than it did in 1996. Americans may even be persuaded to give up their lives to achieve it.
(Before assuming prominent roles in the Bush administration, many of the same people – including Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, John Bolton and others – advocated their imperial views during the Clinton administration via their American think tank, the “Project for a New American Century”.)
Thomas Harrington – professor of Iberian Studies at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut – writes:
[While there are some good articles on the chaos in Iraq, none of them] consider whether the chaos now enveloping the region might, in fact, be the desired aim of policy planners in Washington and Tel Aviv.
***
One of the prime goals of every empire is to foment ongoing internecine conflict in the territories whose resources and/or strategic outposts they covet.
***
The most efficient way of sparking such open-ended internecine conflict is to brutally smash the target country’s social matrix and physical infrastructure.
***
Ongoing unrest has the additional perk of justifying the maintenance and expansion of the military machine that feeds the financial and political fortunes of the metropolitan elite.
In short … divide and rule is about as close as it gets to a universal recourse the imperial game and that it is, therefore, as important to bear it in mind today as it was in the times of Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, the Spanish Conquistadors and the British Raj.
To those—and I suspect there are still many out there—for whom all this seems too neat or too conspiratorial, I would suggest a careful side-by side reading of:
a) the “Clean Break” manifesto generated by the Jerusalem-based Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS) in 1996
and
b) the “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” paper generated by The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) in 2000, a US group with deep personal and institutional links to the aforementioned Israeli think tank, and with the ascension of George Bush Junior to the White House, to the most exclusive sanctums of the US foreign policy apparatus.
To read the cold-blooded imperial reasoning in both of these documents—which speak, in the first case, quite openly of the need to destabilize the region so as to reshape Israel’s “strategic environment” and, in the second of the need to dramatically increase the number of US “forward bases” in the region ….
To do so now, after the US’s systematic destruction of Iraq and Libya—two notably oil-rich countries whose delicate ethnic and religious balances were well known to anyone in or out of government with more than passing interest in history—, and after the its carefully calibrated efforts to generate and maintain murderous and civilization-destroying stalemates in Syria and Egypt (something that is easily substantiated despite our media’s deafening silence on the subject), is downright blood-curdling.
And yet, it seems that for even very well-informed analysts, it is beyond the pale to raise the possibility that foreign policy elites in the US and Israel, like all virtually all the ambitious hegemons before them on the world stage, might have quite coldly and consciously fomented open-ended chaos in order to achieve their overlapping strategic objectives in this part of the world.
Antiwar’s Justin Raimondo notes:
Iraq’s fate was sealed from the moment we invaded: it has no future as a unitary state. As I pointed out again and again in the early days of the conflict, Iraq is fated to split apart into at least three separate states: the Shi’ite areas around Baghdad and to the south, the Sunni regions to the northwest, and the Kurdish enclave which was itching for independence since well before the US invasion. This was the War Party’s real if unexpressed goal from the very beginning: the atomization of Iraq, and indeed the entire Middle East. Their goal, in short, was chaos – and that is precisely what we are seeing today.
***
As I put it years ago:
“[T]he actual purpose was to blow the country to smithereens: to atomize it, and crush it, so that it would never rise again.
“When we invaded and occupied Iraq, we didn’t just militarily defeat Iraq’s armed forces – we dismantled their army, and their police force, along with all the other institutions that held the country together. The educational system was destroyed, and not reconstituted. The infrastructure was pulverized, and never restored. Even the physical hallmarks of a civilized society – roads, bridges, electrical plants, water facilities, museums, schools – were bombed out of existence or else left to fall into disrepair. Along with that, the spiritual and psychological infrastructure that enables a society to function – the bonds of trust, allegiance, and custom – was dissolved, leaving Iraqis to fend for themselves in a war of all against all.
“… What we are witnessing in post-Saddam Iraq is the erasure of an entire country. We can say, with confidence: We came, we saw, we atomized.”
Why? This is the question that inevitably arises in the wake of such an analysis: why deliberately destroy an entire country whose people were civilized while our European ancestors were living in trees?
The people who planned, agitated for, and executed this war are the very same people who have advanced Israeli interests – at America’s expense – at every opportunity. In “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” a 1996 document prepared by a gaggle of neocons – Perle, Douglas Feith, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was urged to “break out” of Israel’s alleged stagnation and undertake a campaign of “regime change” across the Middle East, targeting Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iraq, and eventually Iran. With the exception of Iran – and that one’s still cooking on the back burner – this is precisely what has occurred. In 2003, in the immediate wake of our Pyrrhic “victory” in Iraq, then Prime Minister Ariel Sharon declared to a visiting delegation of American members of Congress that these “rogue states” – Iran, Libya, and Syria – would have to be next on the War Party’s target list.
(Indeed.)
And Michel Chossudovsky points out:
The division of Iraq along sectarian-ethnic lines has been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than 10 years.
What is envisaged by Washington is the outright suppression of the Baghdad regime and the institutions of the central government, leading to a process of political fracturing and the elimination of Iraq as a country.
This process of political fracturing in Iraq along sectarian lines will inevitably have an impact on Syria, where the US-NATO sponsored terrorists have in large part been defeated.
Destabilization and political fragmentation in Syria is also contemplated: Washington’s intent is no longer to pursue the narrow objective of “regime change” in Damascus. What is contemplated is the break up of both Iraq and Syria along sectarian-ethnic lines.
The formation of the caliphate may be the first step towards a broader conflict in the Middle East, bearing in mind that Iran is supportive of the al-Maliki government and the US ploy may indeed be to encourage the intervention of Iran.
The proposed re-division of both Iraq and Syria is broadly modeled on that of the Federation of Yugoslavia which was split up into seven “independent states” (Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia (FYRM), Slovenia, Montenegro, Kosovo).
According to Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, the re division of Iraq into three separate states is part of a broader process of redrawing the Map of the Middle East.
The above map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006, Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).
Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers”. (See Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East” By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Global Research, November 2006)
Notes: While a senior Bush adviser said that the Iraq war was launched to protect Israel, that is too simplistic an explanation. The architects of foreign policy in both the U.S. and Israel are either literally one and the same – e.g. Richard Perle – or see things identically.
And if you think things are different under the Obama administration, please note that not only are the Neocons back, they never actually left.
»
- advertisements -
Thanks to the militarized police in every town, that is no longer true. But go ahead, repeat that to yourself as much as you like. 715,000 likes for a stop-the-militarization of US police departments is just one example. Thanks to a decade of compiling information, including videos, articles, books, documentaries and interviews, The Sleeping Giant has finally awakened. Prick.
We will see whether the Sleeping Giant has any balls.
What purpose does "Prick" serve? I guess that is a dimwitted insult to the person you replied to.
Totally Agree
US planners think globally
Israel and Saudi have limited regional Middle East ambitions.
US has grand "chessboard" plans to contain and dominate/collapse China and Russia.
For the US, ME policy to break Iran is part of a larger design, only secondarily to favor Israel.
Controlling oil and maintaining the petrodollar is part of a larger design of global domination, only coincidentally favoring Saudi sheikhs.
We need more realistic cynicism and recognition about the overall designs of US leaders. We ought dismiss the narrow, naive, hubristic belief that the US is a "global good guy being misled by a few rogue politicians enamored with Israel".
The Empire's designs in Asia, Latin America, Africa, Ukraine AND elsewhere are all connected.
Brzezinski et al are NOT Israeli agents. It is NOT at all about the US taking orders from Israel.
PNAC is a plan intended for US global full-spectrum dominance with the Middle East regarded as a steppingstone, not the endgame.
I might give your theory more credence were PNAC not dominated by dual-citizens.
The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) is what it states it is.
The hubris and exceptionalist beliefs about vital resources oft stated by US presidents are what they appear.
The plots of top advisors like Brzezinski are what they say.
The MIC/militarist objective of full-spectrum global dominance is what it is.
The ME is just one part of the Empire, and control of its oil and the petrodollar only a piece of the overall global design.
pnac was about securing the "realm" of Eretz Israel - not global American hegemony.
In fact, if you look into Jewish eschatology, their fundamentalist belief is that the Jews basically run shit, everyone looks up to them and tells them how wonderful and special they are - even God says so.
http://www.voltairenet.org/article178638.html
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/24-06-2014/127887-israel_bet...
It is a ethnic supremacism and moral solipsism and like Islam, is incompatible with "the other".
>>The most efficient way of sparking such open-ended internecine conflict is to brutally smash the target country’s social matrix and physical infrastructure.
are you the target country, America?
The people actually carrying out the plans for all this empire building and Zionism tend to be Jews, along with their goyim golem. I.e. any goy willing to take a job searching the underpants of other goy for WMDs, etc.
That's a long way from releasing the dancing Israeli terrorists/Jewish supremacists of 911, huh?
Just a coincidence that disorder and chaos are everywhere except Israel? Perhaps the Colonel can show us the map of the U.S. ten years from now?
"Just a coincidence that disorder and chaos are everywhere except Israel?"
Well, that place is pretty f-ed up as well. The devils can't help but soil their own nest.
I guess missiles landing in Israel today rates only as serious as a vehicle accident everywhere else.
Israel needs to fight her own battles and leave the USA out.
and might in the process learn not to pick so many fights..
I'll post the thoughts I was telling *** the other day. A few caveats: I don't have insider knowledge (duh), I'm surely no expert, and this is all speculation. P.S. No one is allowed to use my musings in a novel form. To wit:
That there is a push for a NWO is undeniable. However, I don't for a minute believe that the head of that union is settled. I believe, based on my extensive reading and my ability to synthesize disparate elements to scry a picture, that the 'big boys' are still vying to be the ultimate ruling authority. I believe that this will lead to WWIII, probably by 2020-ish. You can already see the sides forming up: U.S.A., E.U., Japan, Philippines, etc. versus Russia, China, North Korea, etc.The Mideast will divide, much as it is now, with the Shia going with USA and The Shi'ites going with Russia. Between now and when their new weapon systems are due to come online in 2020, the Russians will continue to re-constitute their empire. When they feel ready, they'll invade the Balkans. That will be trigger number one. They will unleash Iran against Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Israel to spread out USA forces. Meanwhile, the Chinese will push hard to build aircraft carriers and offensive missiles. They will continue to try to push the boundaries of their territory in every direction except for Russia, and Afghanistan. First in the South China Sea, and then to the west.Watch for border issues with Nepal, India, Pakistan down the road. When they feel prepared, they will challenge the USA for control of the shipping lanes in the S.China Sea, which will be trigger number two. When they have engaged the USA, they'll unleash N. Korea to spread out USA resources. I fear that The USA will be attacked by Russia (because they have the long-range ability and are physically closer than China), first by EMP, which will throw the country into chaos. Then targeted, tactical nukes against military installations and big armament factories.They'll have to use nukes because the installations are, for the most part, hardened against EMP.The Chinese and Russians will form an uneasy alliance, but neither will allow the other to rule the NWO. So at some point, one will surprise attack the other (my guess would be the Chinese would 'back-door' Russia at a critical time in the fight). The USA is confident that the E.U. is its poodle and won't contest its supremacy. However, the USA is very anxious to get the Mideast under command and control before this erupts. Not just for the sake of oil supplies, but also because of its key geographically tactical position viz Russia and China. I think that is/was the main reason for our involvement in all that crap. THAT is our 'national interest'. We want Israel to neutralize Iran, but it would be crazy to do it until the bulk of Syria's sophisticated weapons are destroyed. Hence our gov's fervent desire to destabilize/bomb/disarm there. If there are a few crazy jihadis with a few rockets left- well, Israel can and does handle that. As long as the bulk of the armaments and chemical weapons there are gone. And the Israelis going after Iran could end up being trigger three, especially if it happens late in the game. Each side truly believes it can win, and the stakes are literally the whole world. With the world's population suffering and dying, they believe it will then be easy to have people accept, hell- beg for, a militarized one world government. Boy, do I sound nutso. But I do think this. If nothing else, it'd make a hell of a novel, already plotted out, eh?
Global watchdog: Syria has shipped out its last 'declared' chemical weapons
www.cnn.com
The final stockpile of Syria's declared chemical weapons has been shipped out of... the country, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons says See More
I was getting interested in your post till I came across this gem: "with the Shia going with USA and The Shi'ites going with Russia"
Jesus H Christ given your 'extensive reading and ability to synthesize disparate elements' would it not have dawned on you that Shia and Shi'ites are one and the same?
Fair point. I was pouring it out and had a brain fart. Sorry. should be Sunni.
am I the only one who see's the US (meaning her armies) as the poodle?
"am I the only one who see's the US (meaning her armies) as the poodle?"
woof.
Responding to 20834A's analysis/predictions:
Good summary and a plausible scenario given current events, etc. Even many (most?) who are alternative media savvy do not seem to see this bigger picture. It is not just one group who is planning to rule the earth.
In the past, one could count the size of armies and analyze the weaponry somewhat easily. Not so now. Much technology is hidden and disinformation is the name of the game. What looks like near complete dominance now may not prove to be in an actual conflict. Besides, the U.S. is playing this VERY strange game of disarming in terms of nukes, nuke subs, etc., etc.
Although there is a good case for the 2020 +/- time frame, the situation seems to be very volatile. That is, the "best laid plans" may not be working out nearly as expected. There is a sense that many internal components within the major players are pushing hard to accelerate kinetic action. Not at all clear that it will take that many years before something major happens.
The US might be easy to split up, leaving Alex "the Arabs run Hollywood" Jonestown and the Zionist soothsayer Glen Beck to fight over Texas.
Apparently Jonestown is willing to profit from creating or prepping for what amounts to a civil war in his own country instead of ending all foreign aide to Israel and shutting down War Inc. (in Jordan, etc.) based on false flags waved by Zionists.
End all foreign aide to Israel. Send Team America to Chicago to win some hearts and minds or build some bridges there if you want to. Or send them to Detroit. Help some black people, the people that a Jewish oligarch like Donald Sterling says that they still treat like dogs to this day. Mainly because they do.
Netanyahu is pretty much telling Team America that they want as many Arabs dead as possible. But consider this, you're just the goy too.
Yeah, and funny how those particular comments weren't revealed in the zio media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPMyJ5pNJp0
It's long standing practice to try to destabilize all the goy/tribes. In modern times it has sometimes been done in the name of civil rights. Ironically whenever goy actually do get along and interracial marriage turns out to be fine and so on, then they celebrate as if that's what they intended all along.
But Judaics weren't necessarily trying to poop rainbows on everyone. That's why they're generally still tribalistis themselves and interracial marriage is forbidden in Israel, etc. All people have to do is study their culture in general. When they're among the goy, then they tend to lead civil rights movements funded by Soros or do the politically correct/identify politics Frankfurt School stuff. When they're in power, then there's no interracial marriage.
Small ramble.
Here's a puppet once made to dance across the checkerboard floor of the black and white base of their game, trying to tell the truth. He even transformed from black to white in an alchemical transformation brought about by the cabals of the Kaballah.
The Cabal Inc. has a point sometimes, a lot of people are pretty stupid. But perhaps it's not a matter of intelligence on the other side of the heavens of the multiverse. Integrity > intelligence? It seems to me that lies, no matter how clever, tend to have a limited life span.
Not a coincidence at all. The balkanization of the ME is all apart of the Greater Israel Project... Made possible by the Zionist/Neocon coup that was 9/11
http://zionismsucks.com/2014/06/17/911-and-the-mossad/
Bwaaaaaaaaaaa, the ME isn't and hasn't been balkanized since it's religious inception? A area larger than the US, that was totally tribal and no nation states (Sans Egypt) until the colonial powers drew the maps on the way out the door
you're one of the more obtuse and nauseating hasbarats around here, aren't you?
Cookie?
Totally tribal and no nation states??
What is Turkey? Not the bird, but the country? Is that, was that a nation state?
Most of it belonged to Turkey. Egypt was a Turkish possesion. So was Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Mecca, Medina, Lybia, ...
The OTTOMAN EMPIRE was balkanized after World War I. The population in the area was mostly tribal.
Reread Falconflight's post.
What does it mean they were balkanized after WW1?
'Americans' got the support of the locals after the promise the locals could organize themselves in a nation state. The promise were denied by 'americans' at the end of the war.
'Americans' did not allow it.
It reads different from the previous comment that states that those guys are tribal by nature and unable to organize themselves.
The Zionist Israeli government is an expansionist, apartheid, militarist, oppressive monster.
But the attempt to exonerate US expansionism, exceptionalism, militarism, and support of brutal governments all over the world,
by attributing US policy as simply obeying Israel
(and hence presumably fixable by getting rid of "Israeli" influence)
is for some, obviously rooted in simplistic bigotry and nativist hubris,
and for others rooted in a denial, a refusal, to connect the dots regarding the US global Empire.
@rwe2late
I think you have a point vis a vis imperialist actions in general around the world however the current middle-east strategy is different in that it is not about creating stable pro-US allies (while ignoring how that stability is maintained) but seems to be designed to cause the maximum amount of chaos, destruction and endless instability.
Balkanizing Mideast nations (including Iraq) has been stated as a long-term goal of US policy to better dominate the region - in turn to contain and dominate China, Russia, and gain access and control of the world's markets and resources.
You are mistaken to think a "stable" or "terror-free" zone was the end goal. Only inasmuch as public propaganda, or using "stability" as a codeword for US domination.
Chaos is regarded as the pathway to domination. Right now, chaos threatens and weakens allies Iran, Russia, and Syria. The breakup of Iraq threatens Iran. A Kurdistan threatens Iran. A "Caliphate" has better access to foment chaos in Chechnya.
Incidentally, Maliki had not delivered on (US) foreign oil privatization nor the status-of-forces agreement. But now?
Does the turmoil open a door for possible US and US sponsored activity with drones and black ops?
Status of force agreement approval?
Plus, the Kurd leaders are all to happy to "privatize" for the US-led western (NATO) powers..
see:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/06/20/the-battle-for-iraqs-oil-wealth/
There's more, but you should get the idea.
It may be fixable by getting rid of Jewish supremacists that keep using the dumb goy in their wars and getting back to the Constitution. All wars are bankers wars. Who are the bankers? Who are the advisers like Kissinger? Who is Victoria Nudelman?
It's the racial supremacists of "goy emanate from a Satanic sphere"/Chabad that can be observed standing around American presidents, not "simplistic bigots and nativists" rebelling next to open air war memorials that have been closed due to lack of debt/money that hardly even have representation in the oligarchy at this point.
Dumb goy.
To blame the US Empire in general would be like blaming the pet scapegoat, W. for 911. You can't be serious. He was sent off to meander around the country while "Al Qaeda" threatened Air Force One. (It was probably Osama himself that penetrated the security around W., calling from one his cave complexes. The ones that Rumsfeld said that he could drive tanks in, etc. Whatever happened to those, anyway?)
"I just want you to think big, Henry" Richard M. Nixon who was suggesting a nuclear strike. The next false flag will demonstrate that logic.
Why don't we stop these people?
Suitcase bombs in many major U.S. cities?
Is that the very first briefing each new president gets?
I mean, wouldn't YOU do it, under the circumstances?
yes, let's be honest about who is really behind this mess:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/13/the-jewish-plan-for-the-middle-e...
John, I agree with you and many others here that Israeli and US Jews are working as one inseparable unit, for their benefit and ascension.
But I think it's a folly and unproductive energy, to focus on them and to blame "them". If they have attained spectacular heights of power and influence, it is not only because of their own combined and coordinated efforts, persistence and devious cleverness. The REAL blame lies at the feet of those who let it happen: Christians.
More specifically: Christians betraying or fighting other Christians -- all to "get ahead". The root cause is: Betrayal and Treason at the Tribal and Religious level, even at the racial level. Note that some of the most ardent pro-Israeli or pro-Zionism people are those "Born Again" Bible-thumpers, filled with the claptrap of a distorted message of Christianity.
European Christians would be better served by elevating the fictitious Viking leader Ragnar Lothbrok to god status, or worshiping "Q" from the Star Trek series, than to keep following the Hippie religion of a Judean peasant -- who would have them be "Lambs and Sheep" rather than leaders and movers, and whose actual accomplishments may not be much less fictitious than those of the aforementioned characters.
Focusing the Debate on "Them" keeps the "ladder" leaning on the wrong wall. By design. Time to kick modern day Christianity in the groins, and time to start fresh with a whole new World View -- one that is not limited by the intellect, education or hygiene of ancient goat herders.
How many to beam up?
All the major religions are co-opted and manipulated and weaponized. Moslems and Christians and Jews alike are divided and conquered. Quoting Marx, with embellishment, "[Organized] religion is the opiate of the people."
Political Ponerology
Everyone needs to take responsiblity for themselves. But in the meantime it's likely that veterans will more and more be added to the SPLC/ADL hate group lists of Zion that will be sent over to the DHS and so on and so forth. Judaics seem to tend toward policing all other tribes/goy, yet they have little to say about their own forms of tribal supremacy.
Veterans often hate (As they have a right to.) what they've seen in wars linked to the tribal supremacy typical to Judaics like Madeline "500,000 Iraqi children starved to death is worth it." Albright. Apparently she's not much different than the Talmudists that wove their ethnic hatred into the Holodomor. Would starving to death 500,000 Jewish kids be worth anything? Would assassinating 16 year old Jewish kids without trial be allowed? I doubt it.
But with respect to "hate." Many veterans begin look around and wonder why they've been sent off to war again and begin to hate the people involved in it, provided they haven't already killed themselves. And then many become fascists or tribalists themselves, no matter how much intermarriage there has been. Repeat. There was the whole idea of the Declaration and the Constitution that were based on the rule of law containing all factions and tribes and not letting anyone achieve supremacy. In theory, it was a good idea. But people didn't really live up to it, something that the Jewish Media Inc. never lets the goy forget. And America is pretty much exceptionally Judaized and "preemptively murder all threats to the tribe" now, apparently we should all convert and celebrate Purim. It's not an eye for an eye. It's an eye for an imaginary event.
You can say "neocon" but there are Jewish supremacists supporting the NDAA and so forth on the left and the right. They're the people changing a culture that was originally cultivated based on the Declaration and the Constitution into one more like their own, where tribalism and exceptional forms of supremacy trump the rule of law.
supporting mass immigration too - and not just in the us [and they were key to the changes in the mid 60s that intentionally aimed to change the demographics] but in europe, too.
Think alan shatter and barbara spectre...
“Neocon is just a nice word for Neo-Nazi. So people need to wake up. When Bush Junior hit the office of the White House and his gang of Neocons came in with a lot of foreign passports (Note: Israeli passports), these were the Nazis. These were the Neo-Nazis who brought us 9/11. I fully believe they’re key players behind the 9/11 attacks.”
NATO Symbol = Modified Swastika
"The best hiding place is in plain sight."
"Order Out of Chaos."
"Perpetual War For Perpetual Peace."
They use proxies, but yes, these are essentially the same psychopaths that financed and choreographed WW1 and WW2. It is still incomprehensible to the vast majority that the horror unleashed overseas is coming here. (As a 97-year-old friend once explained, "ALL THE SIGNS ARE HERE AGAIN. PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE DEBT.") The stupification and indoctrination is incredibly successful. Many will die still mystified, clinging to their myths.
I don't have the vocabulary and knowledge to fully understrand what you mean....
but I think you've got a point.
Try 53,000,000 aborted US babies since 1973, we can kill 500k in 6 months right here in the good old USA. There will be hell to pay for all those involved. Get your house in order.
Veterans often hate (As they have a right to.) what they've seen in wars linked to the tribal supremacy typical to Judaics like Madeline "500,000 Iraqi children starved to death is worth it."
NeocoMs.....repeating Socialist Semite Democrat Media namecalling just makes you look stupid.. GW
There is nothing conservative about these people.
There is everything conservative about these 'americans'.
They want to conserve power, which matters most for 'americans'.
Yes, it's a uniquely 'American' trait shared by despots throughout history *facepalm*