FOMC Minutes Show Fed Fears Investors Are Too Complacent; QE To End In October

Tyler Durden's picture

Having continued to taper, expressed no fear of inflation, and been nothing but confident that Q1 was nothing-but-weather at the press conference, the FOMC Minutes:


Strange not a mention of the surge in Treasury fails but this appears as close to a "sell" as the Fed will give...

Pre-FOMC Minutes: S&P Futs 1964, Gold $1323.50, 10Y 2.59%, Oil $102.22, JPY 101.75

Some of the key excerpts:

On complacency:

The VIX, an index of option-implied volatility for one-month returns on the S&P 500 index, continued to decline and ended the period near its historical lows. Measures of uncertainty in other financial markets also declined; results from the Desk’s primary dealer survey suggested this development might have reflected low realized volatilities, generally favorable economic news, less uncertainty for the path of monetary policy, and complacency on the part of market participants about potential risks.

On the October end to QE:

While the current asset purchase program is not on a preset course, participants generally agreed that if the economy evolved as they anticipated, the program would likely be completed later this year. Some committee members had been asked by members of the public whether, if tapering in the pace of purchases continues as expected, the final reduction would come in a single $15 billion per month reduction or in a $10 billion reduction followed by a $5 billion reduction. Most participants viewed this as a technical issue with no substantive macroeconomic consequences and no consequences for the eventual decision about the timing of the first increase in the federal funds rate—a decision that will depend on the Committee’s evolving assessments of actual and expected progress toward its objectives.

On lack of investor certainty:

A few participants thought that, given the degree of uncertainty about the effects of the Committee’s tools on market rates, it might be preferable to focus on an administered rate in communicating the stance of policy during the normalization period

On lack of wage frowth:

A couple of participants noted that, to date, consumer spending had been supported importantly by gains in household net worth while income gains had been held back by only modest increases in wages. In their view, an important element in the economic outlook was a pickup in income, from higher wages as well as ongoing employment gains, that would be expected to support a sustained rise in consumer spending.

Odd how said pickup never happens then?

Then there was the absolutely laughable normalization, which may be coming sooner than people think, although probably not as nobody has any idea what it means.

Overall, participants generally expressed a pr eference for a simple and clear approach to normalization that would facilitate communication to the public and enhance the credibility of monetary policy. It was observed that it would be useful for the Committee to develop and communicate its plans to the public later this year, well before the first steps in normalizing policy become appropriate. Most participants indicated that they expected to learn more about the effects of the Committee’s various policy tools as normalization proceeds, and many favored maintaining flexibility about the evolution of the normalization process as well as the Committee’s longer-run operating framework. Participants requested additional analysis from the staff on issues related to normalization and agreed that it would be helpful to continue to review these issues at upcoming meetings. The Board meeting concluded at the end of the discussion.

More on the total confusion within the FOMC:

The dispersion of projections for the value of the federal funds rate was little changed in 2015 but widened slightly in 2016. Most participants expected that the federal funds rate at the end of 2016 would still be significantly below their individual assessments of its longer-run level. For about half of these participants, the low level of the federal funds rate at that time was associated with inflation well below the Committee’s 2 percent objective. In contrast, the rest of these participants saw the federal funds rate at the end of 2016 as still significantly low despite their projections that the unemployment rate would be close to or below their individual longer-run projections and inflation would be at or close to 2 percent at that time. These participants cited some combination of a lower equilibrium real interest rate, continuing headwinds from the financial crisis and subsequent recession, and a desire to raise the federal funds rate at a gradual pace after liftoff as explanations for the still-low level of the projected federal funds rate at the end of 2016. A couple of participants also mentioned broader measures of labor market slack that may take longer to return to their normal levels than the unemployment rate.


Estimates of the longer-run level of the federal funds rate ranged from 3¼ to about 4¼ percent, reflecting the Committee’s inflation objective of 2 percent and participants’ individual judgments regarding the appropriate longer-run level of the real federal funds rate in the absence of further shocks  to the economy. Compared with March, some participants revised down their estimates of the longer-run federal funds rate, with a lower assessment of the longer- run level of potential output growth cited as a contributing factor for the majority of those revisions. As a result, the median estimate of the longer-run federal funds rate shifted down to 3.75 percent from 4 percent in March, while its mean value declined 11 basis points to 3.78 percent.

Finally, use of "liftoff":

It was noted that, in the staff’s models, making a change to the Committee’s reinvestment policy prior to the liftoff of the federal funds rate, at the time of liftoff, or sometime thereafter would be expected to have only limited implications for macroeconomic outcomes, the Committee’s statutory objectives, or remittances to the Treasury.




Many participants agreed that ending reinvestments at or after the time of liftoff would be best, with most of these participants preferring to end them after liftoff.




the median dealer had expected reinvestments to end before liftoff.




participants cited some combination of a lower equilibrium real interest rate, continuing headwinds from the financial crisis and subsequent recession, and a desire to raise the federal funds rate at a gradual pace after liftoff as explanations for the still-low level of the projected federal funds rate at the end of 2016.

Full hawkish minutes:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
AllThatGlitters's picture

Gee, who would have expected this?

Live Gold:

Live Silver:

Thw whipsaws are laughable.

Greenskeeper_Carl's picture

I just love how they still have the gall to talk about improving economic conditions after even with their massaged, bullshit numbers, they still admitted to a -2.9% 1st quarter GDP. But don't worry, just the weather, everything is fine.

cifo's picture

October is the month when crashes happen (see 29, 87, 08)

Vagabond's picture

"Belgium" is prepared to further step up their purchases as the Fed exits QE.

Headbanger's picture

Translation:   Ending QE means the end of any promises by the Fed.

Which means "Belgium" can and will be cut out too without any need to announce it as with QE.


So bend over!

whotookmyalias's picture

Fundamentals baby. It's all good. Even Janitors will be making $15 per hour.  Buy, buy, buy! 

knukles's picture

I told Mrs K that I should get a raise to $15/hr for my household duties and she told me to go sleep in the woods, eat bugs and reminded me that I know where my hand is.

Divided States of America's picture

Who is the Fed referring to as 'investors'???? There aint no true investors left in this market. anyways, arent they the 'ones' ordering the purchases of all the stocks to begin with??

SamAdams's picture

Remember when China told us back in Jan? that the FED was out by November?  Better listen to those guys as they have a vested interest.....  Remember what they said about rate hikes?

Metric's picture

I guess this means the politicians should be expecting an "october surprise."

Headbanger's picture

No.  It's about FUNDING now, not fundamentals.

As in the U.S. Treasury won't get any fucking funding from they're previous foreign bond buyers cause they've  all had it with our bullshit "economy" and Obozo as well!

So yields are about to spike and equities are about to be dumped like the shit they really are.

asking4it2k's picture

The FEDs "primary dealers" via Belgium, or EUROCLEAR ?

yogibear's picture

So William Dudley, of the NY Fed,  puts on his Belgium hat on and buys US treasuries.

NotApplicable's picture

Thank God for reverse-repos!

SafelyGraze's picture

in the future, please to use my more thoughtful pose for your accompanying photo teaser


max2205's picture for tons of M&A deals in the next 4 months

RockRiver's picture

DOW headline on my system:

07/09/2014 13:00 *Fed: Some Officials Concerned About Persistent Low Inflation


What Farking low inflation? These guys don't go to a grocery store do they?


1stepcloser's picture

My take when they say low inflation...Credit expansion isn't great enough to keep the ponzi going

Bernoulli's picture

Same in Europe. They keep hammering in our heads that there is low inflation to keep going with unconventional measures. Great system: The only number that has to be manipulated is the inflation rate. Then all the rest will be done "according to the plan" to "save us" from the terrible deflation threat.

"NO WORRIES, bigger balance sheets don't lead to inflation anymore! We will easily extract the money from the system once the time is right".

This time it's different!


kwality's picture

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have entered the negative velocity zone.  Please fasten your seatbelts to prepare for the death spiral.

khakuda's picture

They have done 2 things to mask it.  The first is common knowledge, the second more subtle.

1.  Keep changing the composition of the benchmark and, when that doesn't work, change the benchmark itself.  ie,, hedonic pricing, substitution, go from CPI to CPI ex food/energy then to PCE and PCE less food/energy, etc.

2.  Keep the focus on the monthly number or multiply it by 12 to focus on an annual run rate.  NEVER show the cumulative number over 5, 10 or 20 years because that would highlight how much purchasing power has been stolen from the public.

daveO's picture

Here's a beauty.

The author says there's not enough plant fillers in burgers. I used to eat at MCD's when their burgers tasted like beef, over 20 years ago! 

BeerMe's picture

Don't remind me how depressing grocery shopping is.  Went last night spent $70 or so and the fridge is still empty.

Lewshine's picture

This market wanted to selloff on the news, but was caught and ramped by the plunge protection team, who is always standing ready to catch that falling knife. Jus an absolute crock of SHIT!!!

asking4it2k's picture

The FED wants everyone out of savings and into the stock market. Thats been their plan since the birth of ZIRP.

Everyone in the equities boat so it cannot crash!!

The FED will do every trick in the book to keep the bubble going, while at the same time saying they dont see bubbles, only "noise"

yrad's picture

DOW 17,000! Again! It's like a birthday party for an Alzheimer patient.

robertsgt40's picture

Brussels to the rescue?

Catflappo's picture

70 people listed as being in attendance.

Yep, every chance of a lock-tight cone of silence there then....


Pareto's picture

Nothing to see here folks......move along.

ejmoosa's picture

QE does not end until they withdraw ALL the dollars they have injected.


Issues that have matured are being used to buy more.  They just will not be increasing the total QE amount beyond October(if you actually believe them).

THX 1178's picture

QE does not end until "Belgium" and all other proxy buyers stop buying.

ejmoosa's picture

I cannot argue with that....

mc225's picture

yeah they're like, 'we're not going to fuck with the market any more' and everyone is like, 'yeah right'.

orangegeek's picture

this Fed organization has to be the most useless function in the US economy


the crap that yellen and her fellow con-artists bloviate - generalizations, blatant lying and irrelevant


end the fed

ejmoosa's picture

Worse than useless, they are destructive to the real US Economy.

NotApplicable's picture

They are extremely useful to the 1% and their cronies.

Ness.'s picture

Dow sells off 8 points on FED warning of risks.  First the BIS.  Now the FED.  You just gotta laugh.  

alien-IQ's picture

the market has shrugged off this (sort of) "sell" signal.

wmbz's picture

Same old shit...Nothing but noise. Clear sailing ahead, continue dancing!

Dr. Engali's picture There is no such thing as risk in a riskless society.

gjp's picture

Investors are complacent because you bail them out at the slightest hint of a loss.

Stop printing money and micro-managing every corner of capital markets, and then see what happens to complacency.

Talking constantly out of both sides of their mouths while they enable the kleptocratic dismantling of the global economy.  Lamposts are too good for these people.

GrinandBearit's picture

I guess Zimbabwe will now start buying US treasuries.


ebworthen's picture


WTF does that mean?  They want us like mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed bullshit; or they want to tell us exactly when they are going to pull their monkey wrenches out of the economy?

financialrealist's picture

"They want us like mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed bullshit", thanks for the laugh...ill use that agian...

fonzannoon's picture

so after 5 years of trying to get retail into the market, the fed feels investors are too complacent. So they should get back into cash. Okay....

Slave's picture

"See!!!1 We warned you!!!"

Might be getting ready to pull the plug...

Quinvarius's picture

That butt plug has been plugged in for 7 years.  I wonder what will come out?

Frank N. Beans's picture

dow plunging 0.3 percent from day's high

MrTouchdown's picture

No worries. So long as Belgium doesn't also begin tapering, everything will continue as-is. BTFD or die!