guys ignore the race baiting. Trouble is that racism is very much alive today. If you don't believe me, Fred Phelps held a fund raiser for Al Gore. AT HIS HOUSE. It's political theater, the revolving doors wiht the US government allows this krap. Mortgage blockbusters aka. "WHITE FLIGHT". Which is "ghetto behavior" paid by the MORTGAGE BROKERS! I know people in the midwest who have done their due diligence to keep racism alive against Muslims. And anyone who is not white. White is Right! Unfortunately the politicrats take their payouts and move to California. Yes political subisides, this is political. Just like the fighting between Jews and Muslims in Israel is purely political.
They join in their racism against- like, people not like them. My landlady threw racist comments at me right after I paid the rent. Didn't know she was like this. The Jews and Italians are huge racists. Whites in Simi Valley breed more Nazis than Germany, right outside of Jewish owned Hollywood- CNN sits on the Sunset Strip.
The sick cult of john lennon worship is full of racists.
Asians can be racists, after the racist blacks and Mexicans attacked the Koreans during the Rodney King riots- you can see why they're racist. The Koreans have a more legit reason to fear a group than- say a trust fund hooker bitch from Kentucky who only made poor choices in life.
I understand if you want to be the almighy narcissist. Theres' no fine line between narcissism and sociopathic tendences. That line are the results of the actions of the racist and your silence, apathy... that COLLECTIVE behavior of racism causes very real damage.
Basically, on this site, 'americans' have as background noise, that factions in 'americanism', are not real and a bit of a game to divide and conquer. Left is right etc, no difference between them.
It is enough to look at the first pic to see how much the group matters for 'americans' to see how solid their conviction is.
'Americans' abhor individuality and in the end, their urge to belong to a group is too strong.
'Americans' have that talent at lumping people together though (since for them, the group is all), therefore they tend to associate different ways of thinking to 'americanism', even when strong differences exist. So there is no doubt that on this topic, 'americans' will think that everybody should be part of the observation (and not the critique, moral concerns are 'american' business these days in this 'american' world)
Eventually, it must be remembered that for 'americans', 'americanism' is human nature. The ultimate lumping up.
Nothing was forgotten; 'Americans' do not need to know, they need to act.
By the way, no inspiration by the sticker in the right upper corner in the first pic? For 'americans' claiming the one party system thing, there should be food for thought. Or maybe not. After all, claiming remains claiming.
Why should signing: an American require when it is not?
Ah, so then you are a part of your own critique. Make sense somehow.
Still no thought on the sticker in the right upper corner?
The sign on the wall in Holder's office? It's probably how the guy thinks. After all, as you've said since a long time, 'americans' are big on victimhood. How would it furnish surprisements?
Were not the two parties claimed to be the same?
The superficial differences are only skin deep. Hardly a mattering thing when it comes to serving the King class aka We The People aka the 'american' middle class in extorting the weaks, farming the poors, dilution of responsibility, and exporting blames onto a convenient exterior.
Nah, never said as such thing. Try to understand that in the US philosophy, the group is all. The individual is a non-entity other than as a potential member of a group. This guy alone could not be any 'american' thing.
Since superficial differences are only skin deep, what does an 'american' of the other faction think?
An 'american' of another faction thinks what is required to display submission to that faction. You see, for an 'american', group membership takes precedence over individual matters. So much so that the only valid definition of an 'american' individual is the superposition of all groups one belongs to.
What an 'american' of any faction thinks is determined by the intersection of demonstrated submissions required by group membership.
Other than 'american' propaganda going on, there is nothing to see yet.
The caption reads something in the pic, it does not read something that must be infered.
Since superficial differences are only skin deep, what does an 'american' of the other faction think?
By the way, as indeed, for 'americans', individuals are the recollection of the various groups bits they are scattered on, it goes against the assertion of the one party thing. Just saying. Not that 'americans' are for one second bothered with contradiction, 'americans' are those people who started declaring that freedom was a human right and keeping human beings as slaves.
Other than 'american' propaganda going on, there is nothing to see yet.
The statement is lacking specificity of context and thus too vague to be interpretated.
The caption reads something in the pic, it does not read something that must be infered.
Yes, it reads as it reads. The point being?
Since superficial differences are only skin deep, what does an 'american' of the other faction think?
Answer of this question already told in previous comment. Repeation of question has no ground.
By the way, as indeed, for 'americans', individuals are the recollection of the various groups bits they are scattered on, it goes against the assertion of the one party thing.
Not at all. In fact just the opposite. 'Americans' thrive on contradiction, as it is the essence of 'americanism'. The phoney baloney two party thingie is another way for 'americans' to embrace contradictature. To give as examples, one faction allows to support more war while telling it is for peace, one faction allows to claim for smaller government while growing government to colossus bigger ever than imagined by big poppa commie. Skins deep difference, though, as both factions support extorting the weak, farming the poor, dilution of responsibility, exporting blame to convenient exterior, all in service to the King class aka We The People aka the 'american' middle class.
Not that 'americans' are for one second bothered with contradiction, 'americans' are those people who started declaring that freedom was a human right and keeping human beings as slaves.
Funny way of agreeing with me by expressing disagreement. Be careful you are not turning 'american'. ;)
The answer is given several replies ago. An 'american' of the other faction thinks whatever is required to think in order to demonstrate submission to that faction. Maybe thinks the same, maybe thinks opposite, maybe thinks something based merely on the day of week.
Thinking does not need to be consistent. Only demonstration of submission to the group needs to be consistent. That single little fact is the mattering bit, your obstreperations notwithstanding.
And once for all, instead of avoiding why not face up to it and answer the question which still hangs? What is lumping up, and how does it compare to blobbing up?
An 'american' of the other faction can think whatever is required to demonstrate submission to that faction, it does not answer to the question since it is known what an 'american' member of the other faction thinks.
Since the differences between the two factions are skin deep, what an 'american' member of the other faction thinks about it?
'Americans' have a hard time applying their models to simple reality cases. That is because their models are not supposed to be applied to reality, only remain in the realm of fantasy.
An 'american' of the other faction can think whatever is required to demonstrate submission to that faction, it does not answer to the question since it is known what an 'american' member of the other faction thinks.
Ah, just as I suspected. The duplicitous nature of your eastern European Soviet citizenism shines through. The answer is known to this guy, so all along he is playing games of rhetorics.
'Americans' have a hard time applying their models to simple reality cases. That is because their models are not supposed to be applied to reality, only remain in the realm of fantasy.
Funny as funny, since I was applying the model this guy has propagated since several years now. This guy has a hard time with others applying his model to any cases, since it deprives him of disagreement points. Funny how when the pants are on the other leg this guy relegates his model to fantaisical realm.
But hey, the nature of 'americanized' eastern European Soviet citizens is eternal. His yearning for the good old days of big poppa commie reflects in his jealousy of 'americans' now getting to experience those good old days.
No followups on my part needed, since he will now display denials and fantasy, according to his eternal nature.
it's a good thing i'm here...racism simply must go! i can't take it anymore; and so i'm going to do something about it!
starting right now, the following joke will never again be tolerated -- instant euthanasia for anyone who ever repeats it. no, really, immediate and painful death follows any retelling of this (or any of its derivatives), the horrible knee-slapper i recalled earlier today...and it's all WB's fault. well, there's also beer to blame -- and other things besides.
anyway, i feel i have to tell it before i can ban it -- otherwise, how would anyone know what crime would catalyze automatic annihilation?
{death sentence joke}
Question: "what did abraham lincoln say after his seven day drunk?"
Answer: "I freed who!?!?!?"
truth be known, that's the facts of what happened...it's been purged from all the history books -- yet another consequence of assassination: others get to tell your story for ya.
but i don't want to confuse the subjects of assassination and racism...inasmuch as assassinations are, on balance, good things -- i simply cannot fathom the world we know absent the occasional assassination. where would we, as a nation/race/species, be without the well-aimed and ideologically triggered stray bullet? it's not often we pay tribute to assassins, but...cheers to you expert marksmen with a psychotic bent and bone to pick!
on to other totally unrelated subjects...
i'm going to extend an invitation to president hussain obama...janus will be back on his perch over buzzard's bay by the time our chief executive makes his way to the vineyard for da POTUS' annual va-ca.
as for time and place, mistah president -- i will let you know. at some point i'll drive lucifer down to woods hole, take the ferry and settle into some bar...probably the black dog (and there would be NOTHING symbolic in janus and da president meeting at a place named the "Black Dog"...that would be down-right tacky of me...all perfectly consequential and not loaded with symbolism -- not even a whiff.).
i'm on the seventh day of a seven day drunk...and, know what, i feel like some kid rock -- and i ain't apologizin...
funny thing is, ole hussain and janus would most likely get along just fine...he probably knows how to look on things from perspectives from which most won't...and i'll conceded that he's at least a lil bit bright...and i'll further admit that that oldest daughter of his has most likely reached the point at which she's able to both physically and emotionally integrate the luvin experience...and so, mistah president, i'll invite you to invite me to the compound for some drinks. you can smoke your glass pipe, janus will blow his white lines and then that seventeen-year-old of yours and me can retire to the pool...or clay-baths...or whatev...
okay, hussain, before we go any further...i swear by all Holy Rites that i won't assassinate you if you promise not to assassinate janus. deal? let's shake on it.
over the course of the ongoing janus drunkenness, i've been making several observations of you human beings. and since i can't quite figure you out, i suppose it's best to just accept you for who you are. for example, just the other day, when i'm at that honkey-tonk down the road, observing the conway-twitty/elvis show, my mind honed in on something peculiar.
and though i've always acknowledged this sorta thing without really thinkin it through, at this particular moment it stuck me. the only ingredient lacking in my formula of success is a retard. no shit, every time the crowd's enthusiasm started to wane, that elvis impersonator would summon a down-syndrome child from her chair, and she'd start doin the hula to his "blue hawaii".
at first, i despaired...not knowing where or how-fore one should go about finding & recruiting retards, i knew not what to do. sigh & moan.
eureka!
it suddenly occurred to janus...'janus, you're right-about to pass through virginia, and can easily divert to DC -- a veritable hive for retards...sleep soundly and fret not, you're about to cruise through the black-hole-center-mass of fatuous retardation....you'll be able to pluck em' up like grapes!'
yup, hula-dancin retards is all i need to make it big and collect my stash at the end of the rainbow...DC, i'm a-commin to scoop you dumb-ass retards up like Manna.
man... wb throws this stuff down with such precision... like charlie parker on the third set of the night... when he got the heroin and bourbon mix... just right...
racists everywhere racists to the left racists to the right, only liberals are immune although yews will call us all undermenchen, that's not racisst..how could it be? holder hates us for our freedoms, that's racisst...
Having been born & raised where I was gave me a pretty unique perspective on my people. Its not like its portrayed in the MSM. We kinda look at it like..."WTF are they talking about?"
And being exposed to the "progressive" side of life gave me (and others) another perspective.
Here ya go (true story)...I walked into a gas station a couple years back and there was this cute black chick wearing a Southern Battle Flag shirt. I grinned at her and said you get any comments on that? She just laughed and said oh yeah, most of the time it pisses "them" off, thats why I wear it, just to watch their heads explode.
Now that's my kind of rebel girl, its a regional thing, they just don't get it ;-)
Now that's my kind of rebel girl, its a regional thing, they just don't get it ;-)
__________________________________________________________
Remains to marry her.
Funny thing, is that 'americans' can no longer see through the fabricated world they've created, they take it at face value.
An 'american' looking to sell things, will tell any kind of tales.
The fact that 'americans' consider that expressions by 'americans' in a position to sell something have any other value but to favour the saling act is an evidence that 'americans' are 'american'.
Chess played with "kings" and "knights" is irrelevant to today's gamers. We need to update the game with new pieces that have new moves. Here are some alternates that should help the game appeal to a modern audience:
The Gangster: moves at random but only backwards knocking over other pieces and shouting "mufucker!"
The Banker: jumps over all the other pieces, never actually taking them out of play, but knocking them to the side of the board.
The Athlete: always a black piece moves at diagonal like the Bishop, but only two spaces, at which point the piece demands a $15M contract.
The Keynesian: always moves forward, but with each move it creates additional pawns which eventually crowd the board so that no other pieces can move. Anyone actually moves their Keynesian eventual just ruins the game, therefore it's the preferred piece of total losers who cannot stand to watch anyone else play a good game.
The Tinfoil Hatter: always a white piece moves like the Rook, but always heads toward a corner of the board and when it arrives never moves again. in any direction. Ever.
The ZeroHedger: moves like the King, one space at a time, but cannot change the course of the game at all. Usually moves with the Tinfoil Hatter, therefore eventually ends up in a corner. Not a very useful piece actually but fun to have around in the game if only to poke fun at.
The game is over -- totally over -- when a ZeroHedger from either side lands on the gold or silver square.
The Pawn: This piece is the most plentiful tool on the board and is useful for blocking opponents moves when needed. The pawn often dies and is retired to the side of the board or simply thrown down on the floor. The pawn pays the highest taxes percentage wise of all pieces on the board. Another name for the pawn is "the electorate".
guys ignore the race baiting. Trouble is that racism is very much alive today.
If you don't believe me, Fred Phelps held a fund raiser for Al Gore. AT HIS HOUSE.
It's political theater, the revolving doors wiht the US government allows this krap. Mortgage blockbusters aka. "WHITE FLIGHT". Which is "ghetto behavior" paid by the MORTGAGE BROKERS!
I know people in the midwest who have done their due diligence to keep racism alive against Muslims. And anyone who is not white.
White is Right!
Unfortunately the politicrats take their payouts and move to California.
Yes political subisides, this is political. Just like the fighting between Jews and Muslims in Israel is purely political.
They join in their racism against- like, people not like them.
My landlady threw racist comments at me right after I paid the rent.
Didn't know she was like this.
The Jews and Italians are huge racists.
Whites in Simi Valley breed more Nazis than Germany, right outside of Jewish owned Hollywood- CNN sits on the Sunset Strip.
The sick cult of john lennon worship is full of racists.
Asians can be racists, after the racist blacks and Mexicans attacked the Koreans during the Rodney King riots- you can see why they're racist. The Koreans have a more legit reason to fear a group than- say a trust fund hooker bitch from Kentucky who only made poor choices in life.
I understand if you want to be the almighy narcissist. Theres' no fine line between narcissism and sociopathic tendences. That line are the results of the actions of the racist and your silence, apathy... that COLLECTIVE behavior of racism causes very real damage.
Justified hatred is a dangerous walk to take for 'americans'.
http://www.zerohedge.com/help/notice-racism
Anyone that believes there are no physical, intellectual and psychological differences among races is a child.
If speaking truth makes me a racist, I think I can live with it.
Basically, on this site, 'americans' have as background noise, that factions in 'americanism', are not real and a bit of a game to divide and conquer. Left is right etc, no difference between them.
It is enough to look at the first pic to see how much the group matters for 'americans' to see how solid their conviction is.
'Americans' abhor individuality and in the end, their urge to belong to a group is too strong.
Are you a part of your own critique?
It is very doubtful. In what way?
'Americans' have that talent at lumping people together though (since for them, the group is all), therefore they tend to associate different ways of thinking to 'americanism', even when strong differences exist. So there is no doubt that on this topic, 'americans' will think that everybody should be part of the observation (and not the critique, moral concerns are 'american' business these days in this 'american' world)
Eventually, it must be remembered that for 'americans', 'americanism' is human nature. The ultimate lumping up.
Signed: an 'american'
You forgot that.
Also, what is lumping up, and how does it compare to blobbing up?
Nothing was forgotten; 'Americans' do not need to know, they need to act.
By the way, no inspiration by the sticker in the right upper corner in the first pic? For 'americans' claiming the one party system thing, there should be food for thought. Or maybe not. After all, claiming remains claiming.
.
Ah, ah, so the whole "Signed: an 'american'" is just an act? So that would make you...
But hey, such paradoxicality is an unmattering thing, because 'americans' do not need to know.
Why should signing: an American require when it is not? Still no thought on the sticker in the right upper corner?
Were not the two parties claimed to be the same?
.
Ah, so then you are a part of your own critique. Make sense somehow.
The sign on the wall in Holder's office? It's probably how the guy thinks. After all, as you've said since a long time, 'americans' are big on victimhood. How would it furnish surprisements?
The superficial differences are only skin deep. Hardly a mattering thing when it comes to serving the King class aka We The People aka the 'american' middle class in extorting the weaks, farming the poors, dilution of responsibility, and exporting blames onto a convenient exterior.
It is probably how this 'american' guy thinks?
He alone is the liberal faction. How 'american'.
Since superficial differences are only skin deep, what does an 'american' of the other faction think?
.
Nah, never said as such thing. Try to understand that in the US philosophy, the group is all. The individual is a non-entity other than as a potential member of a group. This guy alone could not be any 'american' thing.
An 'american' of another faction thinks what is required to display submission to that faction. You see, for an 'american', group membership takes precedence over individual matters. So much so that the only valid definition of an 'american' individual is the superposition of all groups one belongs to.
What an 'american' of any faction thinks is determined by the intersection of demonstrated submissions required by group membership.
Other than 'american' propaganda going on, there is nothing to see yet.
The caption reads something in the pic, it does not read something that must be infered.
Since superficial differences are only skin deep, what does an 'american' of the other faction think?
By the way, as indeed, for 'americans', individuals are the recollection of the various groups bits they are scattered on, it goes against the assertion of the one party thing. Just saying. Not that 'americans' are for one second bothered with contradiction, 'americans' are those people who started declaring that freedom was a human right and keeping human beings as slaves.
.
The statement is lacking specificity of context and thus too vague to be interpretated.
Yes, it reads as it reads. The point being?
Answer of this question already told in previous comment. Repeation of question has no ground.
Not at all. In fact just the opposite. 'Americans' thrive on contradiction, as it is the essence of 'americanism'. The phoney baloney two party thingie is another way for 'americans' to embrace contradictature. To give as examples, one faction allows to support more war while telling it is for peace, one faction allows to claim for smaller government while growing government to colossus bigger ever than imagined by big poppa commie. Skins deep difference, though, as both factions support extorting the weak, farming the poor, dilution of responsibility, exporting blame to convenient exterior, all in service to the King class aka We The People aka the 'american' middle class.
Funny way of agreeing with me by expressing disagreement. Be careful you are not turning 'american'. ;)
The point being:
No answer is yet given.
Since superficial differences are only skin deep, what does an 'american' of the other faction think?
.
No answer is yet given? Oh oh Santa Klaus.
The answer is given several replies ago. An 'american' of the other faction thinks whatever is required to think in order to demonstrate submission to that faction. Maybe thinks the same, maybe thinks opposite, maybe thinks something based merely on the day of week.
Thinking does not need to be consistent. Only demonstration of submission to the group needs to be consistent. That single little fact is the mattering bit, your obstreperations notwithstanding.
And once for all, instead of avoiding why not face up to it and answer the question which still hangs? What is lumping up, and how does it compare to blobbing up?
An 'american' of the other faction can think whatever is required to demonstrate submission to that faction, it does not answer to the question since it is known what an 'american' member of the other faction thinks.
Since the differences between the two factions are skin deep, what an 'american' member of the other faction thinks about it?
'Americans' have a hard time applying their models to simple reality cases. That is because their models are not supposed to be applied to reality, only remain in the realm of fantasy.
.
Ah, just as I suspected. The duplicitous nature of your eastern European Soviet citizenism shines through. The answer is known to this guy, so all along he is playing games of rhetorics.
Funny as funny, since I was applying the model this guy has propagated since several years now. This guy has a hard time with others applying his model to any cases, since it deprives him of disagreement points. Funny how when the pants are on the other leg this guy relegates his model to fantaisical realm.
But hey, the nature of 'americanized' eastern European Soviet citizens is eternal. His yearning for the good old days of big poppa commie reflects in his jealousy of 'americans' now getting to experience those good old days.
No followups on my part needed, since he will now display denials and fantasy, according to his eternal nature.
Eastern european soviet citizenism? Are not USSR supposed to be ended?
Guess it is like the two party thing, hard to stick to it.
Would be nice to list all those things in the few years, there is going to be a lot.
By the way, since the difference between the two parties are skin deep, what is a member of the other party supposed to think?
it's a good thing i'm here...racism simply must go! i can't take it anymore; and so i'm going to do something about it!
starting right now, the following joke will never again be tolerated -- instant euthanasia for anyone who ever repeats it. no, really, immediate and painful death follows any retelling of this (or any of its derivatives), the horrible knee-slapper i recalled earlier today...and it's all WB's fault. well, there's also beer to blame -- and other things besides.
anyway, i feel i have to tell it before i can ban it -- otherwise, how would anyone know what crime would catalyze automatic annihilation?
{death sentence joke}
Question: "what did abraham lincoln say after his seven day drunk?"
Answer: "I freed who!?!?!?"
truth be known, that's the facts of what happened...it's been purged from all the history books -- yet another consequence of assassination: others get to tell your story for ya.
but i don't want to confuse the subjects of assassination and racism...inasmuch as assassinations are, on balance, good things -- i simply cannot fathom the world we know absent the occasional assassination. where would we, as a nation/race/species, be without the well-aimed and ideologically triggered stray bullet? it's not often we pay tribute to assassins, but...cheers to you expert marksmen with a psychotic bent and bone to pick!
on to other totally unrelated subjects...
i'm going to extend an invitation to president hussain obama...janus will be back on his perch over buzzard's bay by the time our chief executive makes his way to the vineyard for da POTUS' annual va-ca.
as for time and place, mistah president -- i will let you know. at some point i'll drive lucifer down to woods hole, take the ferry and settle into some bar...probably the black dog (and there would be NOTHING symbolic in janus and da president meeting at a place named the "Black Dog"...that would be down-right tacky of me...all perfectly consequential and not loaded with symbolism -- not even a whiff.).
i'm on the seventh day of a seven day drunk...and, know what, i feel like some kid rock -- and i ain't apologizin...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIJN8IiDse0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAY3liSnSrk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1S6YwQjzXU
funny thing is, ole hussain and janus would most likely get along just fine...he probably knows how to look on things from perspectives from which most won't...and i'll conceded that he's at least a lil bit bright...and i'll further admit that that oldest daughter of his has most likely reached the point at which she's able to both physically and emotionally integrate the luvin experience...and so, mistah president, i'll invite you to invite me to the compound for some drinks. you can smoke your glass pipe, janus will blow his white lines and then that seventeen-year-old of yours and me can retire to the pool...or clay-baths...or whatev...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP3haouVUOI
okay, hussain, before we go any further...i swear by all Holy Rites that i won't assassinate you if you promise not to assassinate janus. deal? let's shake on it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOBP7QMuHHs
over the course of the ongoing janus drunkenness, i've been making several observations of you human beings. and since i can't quite figure you out, i suppose it's best to just accept you for who you are. for example, just the other day, when i'm at that honkey-tonk down the road, observing the conway-twitty/elvis show, my mind honed in on something peculiar.
and though i've always acknowledged this sorta thing without really thinkin it through, at this particular moment it stuck me. the only ingredient lacking in my formula of success is a retard. no shit, every time the crowd's enthusiasm started to wane, that elvis impersonator would summon a down-syndrome child from her chair, and she'd start doin the hula to his "blue hawaii".
at first, i despaired...not knowing where or how-fore one should go about finding & recruiting retards, i knew not what to do. sigh & moan.
eureka!
it suddenly occurred to janus...'janus, you're right-about to pass through virginia, and can easily divert to DC -- a veritable hive for retards...sleep soundly and fret not, you're about to cruise through the black-hole-center-mass of fatuous retardation....you'll be able to pluck em' up like grapes!'
yup, hula-dancin retards is all i need to make it big and collect my stash at the end of the rainbow...DC, i'm a-commin to scoop you dumb-ass retards up like Manna.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62iCo7euuPg
thank you for your wine, california/
thank you for your sweet and bitter fruits/
...got to scrape that shit right-off your shoes,
janus
Racism is an integral bit in 'americanism'.
In an 'american' world, 'americans' cant allow racism to go.
Racism comes in all colors.
You are CRAZED! (But in a good way...)
muchas gracias.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NRr2QrXn7s
when you're back in your ole neighborhood/
the cigarettes taste so good,
janus
9
Remember the unfortunate cop who questioned indignant black prof Louis Gates?
Banzai's dun got off da chain! ;-)
"Aiiiiihhh ahm ah man-yaan of constant borrow, ah've seen trahbull- all my pay days!"
....BOY THAT WAS SOME MIGHTY FINE AH PRINTIN' AND AH STEALIN'!
http://youtu.be/oLRxEH7uLT8
lol...and tales of brave Ulysses ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g
man... wb throws this stuff down with such precision... like charlie parker on the third set of the night... when he got the heroin and bourbon mix... just right...
artful mastery... damn...
keep boppin'... wb
...peace...
the sparkling waves are calling you
to kiss their white laced lips...
(shudder)... not me man...
racists everywhere racists to the left racists to the right, only liberals are immune although yews will call us all undermenchen, that's not racisst..how could it be? holder hates us for our freedoms, that's racisst...
Never did like chains.
Peace all over PC;)
Its good, bustin those things.
Having been born & raised where I was gave me a pretty unique perspective on my people. Its not like its portrayed in the MSM. We kinda look at it like..."WTF are they talking about?"
And being exposed to the "progressive" side of life gave me (and others) another perspective.
Here ya go (true story)...I walked into a gas station a couple years back and there was this cute black chick wearing a Southern Battle Flag shirt. I grinned at her and said you get any comments on that? She just laughed and said oh yeah, most of the time it pisses "them" off, thats why I wear it, just to watch their heads explode.
Now that's my kind of rebel girl, its a regional thing, they just don't get it ;-)
Now that's my kind of rebel girl, its a regional thing, they just don't get it ;-)
__________________________________________________________
Remains to marry her.
Funny thing, is that 'americans' can no longer see through the fabricated world they've created, they take it at face value.
An 'american' looking to sell things, will tell any kind of tales.
The fact that 'americans' consider that expressions by 'americans' in a position to sell something have any other value but to favour the saling act is an evidence that 'americans' are 'american'.
Amen, Bro.
We have fun with the progs, bless their little hearts.
Let them think what they want to think, it makes us stronger ;-)
I hope when this cocksucker dies they publish how to find his grave so I can piss on it.
Why wait?
wouldn't want to make him a worshipped martyr now, would we?...
...peace...
Chess requires intelligence, planning, understanding the rules of the game, and occasionally, STUDY...,
so of course it is racist. Well played, William.
PS the losers don't get trophies. enough said.
The poor little black mens don't get no respects; everbuddy knows dat. Dat;s why the little white guys always wins.
Chess played with "kings" and "knights" is irrelevant to today's gamers. We need to update the game with new pieces that have new moves. Here are some alternates that should help the game appeal to a modern audience:
The Gangster: moves at random but only backwards knocking over other pieces and shouting "mufucker!"
The Banker: jumps over all the other pieces, never actually taking them out of play, but knocking them to the side of the board.
The Athlete: always a black piece moves at diagonal like the Bishop, but only two spaces, at which point the piece demands a $15M contract.
The Keynesian: always moves forward, but with each move it creates additional pawns which eventually crowd the board so that no other pieces can move. Anyone actually moves their Keynesian eventual just ruins the game, therefore it's the preferred piece of total losers who cannot stand to watch anyone else play a good game.
The Tinfoil Hatter: always a white piece moves like the Rook, but always heads toward a corner of the board and when it arrives never moves again. in any direction. Ever.
The ZeroHedger: moves like the King, one space at a time, but cannot change the course of the game at all. Usually moves with the Tinfoil Hatter, therefore eventually ends up in a corner. Not a very useful piece actually but fun to have around in the game if only to poke fun at.
The game is over -- totally over -- when a ZeroHedger from either side lands on the gold or silver square.
So that's my short list. Suggestions welcome.
well played, cougar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxKAprtLh7M
when the White Knight is talking backwards/
and the red queen's, "off with her head"/
remember what the doorman said/
feed your head...,
janus
Very creative CW. I enjoyed that one.:-)
I might add one more though.
The Pawn: This piece is the most plentiful tool on the board and is useful for blocking opponents moves when needed. The pawn often dies and is retired to the side of the board or simply thrown down on the floor. The pawn pays the highest taxes percentage wise of all pieces on the board. Another name for the pawn is "the electorate".
King CEO
Queen Madam
Bishop Child molester
Knight Usurer
Rook Godfather
Pawn Wage slave
Nope. Still relevant.
TSA Grunt--Gets to grope all the other pieces from behind
Wookee--Replaces the Rook
En Piss Off--Replaces En Passant
The Furious-fast-one: progressively attacks your own pieces and converts them into opponent's pieces.
See also above for details on TPTB and the Rehypothecator Pawn.