This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Barclays Wants Dark Pool Complaint Against It Dismissed, Says "Nobody Was Harmed"; NY Attorney General Disagrees

Tyler Durden's picture




 

File this one for the bizarro files.

After Barclays was caught lying to its "sophisticated" clients about how it handles their order following the lawsuit by NY AG Schneiderman, the bank, having suffered an epic 75% collapse of trading volume in its dark pool, has decided to fight back and earlier today filed a motion to dismiss the dark pool complaint against it. Its main argument, as reported by the WSJ, is that the attorney general's complaint "fails to identify any fraud, establishing no material misstatements, no identified victims and no actual harm." In other words, Barclays alleges the dark pool participants were smart enough to figure out Barclays was lying to them when it promised their order flow wouldn't be offered up to predatory algos.

More:

In its response, Barclays says the attorney general's office took a number of details out of context and didn't provide a full account of documents cited in its complaint, according to a copy of the motion filed with New York's Supreme Court early Thursday.

 

The bank says its clients were sophisticated investors who were well aware that its dark pool, an off-exchange trading venue that doesn't post investors' buy and sell orders, included trading by high-speed firms.

 

Barclays also argues the Martin Act, the New York state securities law it is alleged to have violated, doesn't apply to the case. The bank argues the act, which doesn't require prosecutors to prove a firm intended to defraud investors, is limited to actions related to the purchase and sale of securities and doesn't apply to claims made regarding the operation of a dark pool.

 

The bank said the New York attorney general's office is overstepping its mandate by attempting to regulate dark pools, which it says is primarily the responsibility of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC oversees dark pools, which account for abut 14% of U.S. trading volume, under Regulation ATS, short for "alternative trading system."

 

"Barclays works closely with its regulators in all jurisdictions and will continue to cooperate with the New York attorney general," Barclays spokesman Mark Lane said in a statement. "However, we do not believe that this suit is justified, and we have a duty to our shareholders, clients and staff to defend our position.

It will be interesting if a judge finds merit in this angle which is, stated simply: we may have lied but our clients should have known we are lying.... something that the rating agencies claimed repeatedly in the years following the Lehman collapse.

So far, Schneiderman isn't buying it as confirmed by the release he just put out moments ago:

The following statement was issued today by Damien LaVera, Communications Director for Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman:

“The complaint filed last month by Attorney General Schneiderman clearly details the allegations that Barclays engaged in a persistent pattern of fraud and deceit, lying to its investors in order to grow its own dark pool. The Attorney General is committed to ensuring there is one set of rules for everyone in the markets, and will crack down on abuses wherever he sees them. We are confident that a judge will reject this motion and allow us to prove these disturbing allegations in Court.”

Attorney General Schneiderman’s complaint, filed last month, alleges that Barclays falsified marketing material purporting to show the extent and type of high frequency trading in its dark pool. For example, Barclays removed from a marketing document intended for institutional investors references to the dark pool’s then-largest participant – a high frequency trading firm Barclays knew engaged in predatory behavior in the dark pool.  In response, one employee stated: “I had always liked the idea that we were being transparent, but happy to take liberties if we can all agree.”

Barclays heavily promoted a service called Liquidity Profiling, which the bank claimed was a “surveillance” system that tracked every trade in Barclays’ dark pool in order to identify predatory traders, rate them based on objective characteristics of their trading behavior, and hold them accountable for engaging in predatory practices.

Contrary to those promises, the complaint alleges that:

  • Barclays has never prohibited any trader from participating in its dark pool, regardless of how predatory its activity was determined to be;
  • Barclays did not regularly update the ratings of high-frequency trading firms monitored by Liquidity Profiling;
  • Barclays “overrode” certain Liquidity Profiling ratings – including for some of its own internal trading desks that engaged in high-frequency trading – by assigning safe ratings to traders that were determined to be toxic.

The complaint further alleges that, contrary to Barclays’ representations that it protects clients from aggressive or predatory high-frequency trading in its dark pool, Barclays in fact operates its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders and has actively sought to attract them by giving them systemic advantages over others trading in the pool. As alleged in the complaint, this included:

  • Falsely underrepresenting the concentration of aggressive high-frequency trading in its dark pool;
  • Misrepresenting its Liquidity Profiling service – which Barclays claimed protected investors from predatory behavior – by failing to provide many of the benefits marketed with the service; and
  • Claiming that Barclays does not favor its own dark pool when routing client orders to trading venues, while in fact doing just that. As alleged in our Complaint, Barclays falsified an analysis of how it routed a major client’s orders.

* * *

Sadly for Barclays the damage at this point has been done as the bulk of its buyside clients have already migrated to other dark pool platforms. And since without buyside order flow to frontrun the HFTs have zero use for Barclays LX, whatever happens from this point on is merely window dressing. As for Barclays it may want to seek out markets it can allegedly rig.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:22 | 4998781 NOTaREALmerican
NOTaREALmerican's picture

I think they've suffered enough, and it's time to move on from this unfortunate, but completely isolated, incident; which is more a reflections on particular individuals than the institution as a hole. 

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:30 | 4998799 90's Child
90's Child's picture

All banks one way or a another is corrupt.
BoA
Cyprus
HSBC
JPM

The list goes on.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:49 | 4998927 svayambhu108
svayambhu108's picture

Time to clean the guillotine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVxsJdp6lh0

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:02 | 4998951 lordylord
lordylord's picture

How many victimless "crimes" are met with huge fines and JAIL TIME for the general public (e.g. speeding, buying/selling drugs, etc.)?  Shit, some black dude was just murdered by some sick pigs because he was suspected of illegally selling cigarettes.  While I believe an act without a victim is not a crime, this doesn't appy to Barclays because they did fuck people over.  Can't wait for the collapse.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:42 | 4999249 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture
NY Attorney General Disagrees

He will be "Spitzered" if he disagrees too vehemently.  No one is allowed to ascend the halls of power without a background which makes them suitable for blackmail and expungement if they go against the power.

Conspiracy Fact.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:16 | 4999104 CPL
CPL's picture

It's like peeling a bag of potatoes for salad.  Takes a couple of cuts to scrape the crap off the whole bag so it's fit for consumption.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:27 | 4998806 Skateboarder
Skateboarder's picture

Why would you ever feel bad for a bank, especially in this day and age?

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:31 | 4998824 90's Child
90's Child's picture

I'd feel bad if they didn't get what they deserve.

Lead or rope.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:33 | 4998835 Skateboarder
Skateboarder's picture

Killing it/them with fire is the only guaranteed way, kind of like how they burn down their own buildings with records dating back decdades.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 20:29 | 5001612 yield_curver
yield_curver's picture

Truth: Building 7, WTC

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:53 | 4998913 CPL
CPL's picture

Put the bunch of them on the 'list' and resolve it.  They've been a company long enough and been bankrupt often enough to warrant a complete removal.  They simply aren't worth their word or the organs in their bodies at this point to anyone.

Everything from a director on up is fair game.  Game on. 

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:23 | 4999131 Postal
Postal's picture

A waste of both lead and rope. Just bury them in sand at low tide.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:26 | 4998790 Otto Zitte
Otto Zitte's picture

Well throw some more bankers off the roof then. Its all good.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:50 | 4998932 CPL
CPL's picture

No, something special for Barclay's.  It's going to get weird..  Grab a deck chair.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:26 | 4998796 Colonel Klink
Colonel Klink's picture

Fuck you Barclays, you're one of the scumbag banks at the center of this whole shit storm.  Please take your shilling peers, Golum sacks, Bankruptcy of America, Wells Fartco, Blackcock, RBS, Douche Bank, et. al. with you and die.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:28 | 4998809 fonzannoon
fonzannoon's picture

remember that time everyone got mad at Deutsche bank for a half hour? Man that was crazy.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:30 | 4998818 kito
kito's picture

one time i refused to step foot inside my tbtf out of protest...yeah i showed them!!!!!....then i realized i had a business to run.............

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 15:01 | 4999755 Colonel Klink
Colonel Klink's picture

Why refuse kito, they're your brethren.

I pulled all my business and dealings from the majors.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:15 | 4999094 ShorTed
ShorTed's picture

+10  nice job on the nicknames Herr Colonel!

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:32 | 4998825 CheapBastard
CheapBastard's picture

“No one was harmed.”

 

 

So when the low-income or middle class Yute goes for a  30 minute ‘joy ride’ and gets thrown in jail for 2-5 years for “Grand Theft Auto” can he appeal “No one was harmed?” ...........................

Too bad … the law is enforced solely against the little peeples.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:39 | 4998875 MASTER OF UNIVERSE
MASTER OF UNIVERSE's picture

Ever since Lehman's chapter 11 the USA has had a hate on for Barclays.

"We don't want to import your cancer", Mr. Paulson!

Hank Paulson on eve of Lehman Bros. chapter 11....

"Barclays fucked us" 2008 September 15th

Payback is a bitch, eh.

There is no honour amongst thieves, Mr. Schneiderman.

 

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 12:50 | 4998928 JenkinsLane
JenkinsLane's picture

Although its primary intent was to deal with organized crime, Blakey said that Congress never intended it to merely apply to the Mob. He once told Time, "We don't want one set of rules for people whose collars are blue or whose names end in vowels, and another set for those whose collars are white and have Ivy League diplomas."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizati...

 

 

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:05 | 4999041 orangegeek
orangegeek's picture

lying is the new truth - welcome to the nwo

 

 

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:09 | 4999063 Fuku Ben
Fuku Ben's picture

Where do we sign on to the global class action lawsuit?

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:23 | 4999099 Pasadena Phil
Pasadena Phil's picture

That's like the guy who murders his parents and then appeals to the court to show mercy for an orphan.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:20 | 4999121 yogibear
yogibear's picture

That Attorney General better be careful. These bankster have a lot of money involved. They either ruin people or make them fall off of tall buildings.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 13:25 | 4999151 Postal
Postal's picture

Or cause them to have nail gun accidents.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 14:02 | 4999351 Umh
Umh's picture

The whole concept of dark pools is to benefit the largest investors. It may not hurt the little investor much individually, but it is sure shafting them collectively.

Thu, 07/24/2014 - 14:52 | 4999692 Joebloinvestor
Joebloinvestor's picture

Our LYING didn't hurt anyone (who counts).

HAHAHAHAHA

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!