This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Social Security Versus CBO - Who Do You Trust?

Bruce Krasting's picture




 

 

The 2014 Social Security report to Congress is finally out (Link). The report was released four-months later than permitted by law; this is the sixth year in a row that the Report has been late. The word 'sloppy' comes to mind; Treasury Secretary Lew gets a 'D' for timeliness.

I'm blow out by this year's report! It was just 13 days ago that the Congressional Budget Office released its numbers for SS (Link). There are very significant variances on key metrics for SS. The inescapable conclusion comparing the two reports is that either; (1) CBO is misrepresenting numbers with some kind of political agenda in mind, or (2) SS is sand bagging its numbers for reasons that have to be political as well.

There are few key metrics to consider. The first is the Immediate and Permanent (I&P) payroll tax increase necessary to 'fix' SS for the next 75 years. CBO says that the I&P is 4%, while SS claims it is only 2.88%. One might look at the two numbers and say, "What's the big dif?, the two #s are only 1.12% different!" Actually, the 1.12% comes to very big bucks. Over the 75 year period it comes to trillions of dollars. For 2015 the difference in the I&P calculation comes to $75B. That's a lot of Billions.

Another data point is the estimate for the year in which the SS Trust Funds become depleted. CBO has this date as 2030 while SS thinks it will be delayed until 2033. One could drive a truck through the different estimates.

A critical milestone for SS will be the year in which the SSTFs top-out and begin the rundown to zero. CBO has this happening in 2017, while SS says it will not happen until three years later in 2020. A three year difference in something that is only 2 1/2 year away? How could the models differ so widely?

 

It's my opinion that SS has warped its numbers. What SS has provided is:

 

Ho Hum, nothing has changed from last year. No needed to think about SS today, and certainly do not to make this an election issue. We wouldn't want Conservative folks to have something to talk about this fall.

 

CBO, on the other hand, is saying:

 

Red Alert! America's biggest single expense is a running amok. In less than 15 years there will be a crisis, and it will be very expensive to 'fix' it. For heaven's sake, please, let's have a dialog about this before it's too late!

 

 

sandbag-property-800x800

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 07/29/2014 - 15:15 | 5019048 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Stupid should hurt.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:43 | 5014107 slightlyskeptical
slightlyskeptical's picture

How is the funding level if 3/4 of seniors die in WW3?

 

The different forecast are obviously using different assumptions. An error in assumptions will mean a much greater difference in what is seen here. It's like doing a financial plan for someone assuming 8% a year returns. Do the same plan where they only earn 6% and they are dreadfully underfunded. Show them 10% returns and they feel they can stop saving.

Time for the Rumsfield quote about 'unknowns"

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 23:31 | 5016064 The Most Intere...
The Most Interesting Frog in the World's picture

Is it too late to use boomers as human shields for Hamas underground tunnels?

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 16:09 | 5019373 JRobby
JRobby's picture

Could be. But not too late for a boomer to slap the shit out of you causing you to cry to mommy.

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 00:16 | 5016232 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

Angry frog

I assume you are entirely self sufficient and always have been. No help from the older generation you hate.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 18:04 | 5014775 neuronius
neuronius's picture

How is the funding level if 3/4 of seniors die in WW3?

I think the number would actually be closer to 92% dead, leaving 8%, given their previously stated population target of 500,000 for the planet (Georgia Guidestones).

 

Time for the Rumsfield quote about 'unknowns"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk

Listening to this really makes me laugh, these guys are so full of shit.  It's funny, really.

 

Stop, Drop, and ROFL

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:40 | 5014078 Berspankme
Berspankme's picture

Kind of funny. Bruce is questioning if someone is lying? Of course they are lying, it's what they do

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:31 | 5014010 kaiserhoff
kaiserhoff's picture

Social Security was, is, and always will be a Ponzi Fraud.

Let It Burn.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 17:09 | 5014533 Accounting101
Accounting101's picture

Please understand the legal underpinnings of Social Security and particularly the Social Security treasury fund account. When you fully understand the law, your comment above will embarrass you.

Krasting is trying to separate you from your assets. I hope he is not successful.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 23:34 | 5016073 The Most Intere...
The Most Interesting Frog in the World's picture

Your head has been completely separated from your neck and is firmly and squarely up your ass is the point I'm trying to make to you.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 23:29 | 5015997 ThroxxOfVron
ThroxxOfVron's picture

"Krasting is trying to separate you from your assets."

 

The ONLY way to know that You OWN something is to SELL it.

I am MORE than williing to be 'seperated from MY ASSET' ( pending notional SS benefit revenue stream ) for a price of my choosing.

Since there is NO WAY IN HELL that I can legally SELL what You ( and Others ) continually refer to as 'MY ASSET' it is clear that You are either a fool or a shill.

 

I'm somehow wrong?

Define EXACTLY HOW an unrealized notional payments stream that may or may not be made in full, or may or may not be paid begining on any particular date if at all, that I cannot SELL, is some kind of ASSET.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 17:16 | 5014568 kaiserhoff
kaiserhoff's picture

Had you been in one of my classes, you clearly would have failed accounting 101 (actually designated 201 at most colleges).

You do not understand the difference between assets and liabilities.

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 16:03 | 5019342 JRobby
JRobby's picture

You don't need to any more. (see Federal Reserve)

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 17:52 | 5014731 Accounting101
Accounting101's picture

What I do understand is Social Security law and specifically how it relates to the Social Security treasury fund account. As for the difference between assets and liabilities, I understand that as well as China, Germany, Warren Buffet and the Koch brothers.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 18:02 | 5014771 kaiserhoff
kaiserhoff's picture

Grow up and get a real job.

Then you will have something to contribute to the conversation.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:27 | 5013992 NoTTD
NoTTD's picture

When it will run out of money?   It's been running on a deficit for the last three years. 

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 17:11 | 5014542 Accounting101
Accounting101's picture

Never! It's against the law for SS to run a deficit.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:24 | 5013974 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

"Social Security Versus CBO - Who Do You Trust?"

Neither.

Who's lying? Both.

 

"I should be on Jeopardy."

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 16:01 | 5019333 JRobby
JRobby's picture

What is "All of these fuckers" for $100

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 16:13 | 5014229 Salsipuedes
Salsipuedes's picture

And now, for 1000 Fed Notes, the Answer is: "Janet Yellen's Pension".

Steve-O: "uhhh....ummm...What is the current capital value of the Social Security Retirment Fund?" "

"That is.....CORRECTOMUNDO!  young Steve-O! The board's all yours..."

"I'll take 'Why Me?' for a Billion Alex."

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:20 | 5013951 Casserole of no...
Casserole of nonsense's picture

Was this article written 10 years ago?

"For 2015 the difference in the I&P calculation comes to $75B. That's a lot of Billions."

I mean, when was the last time $75 billion was considered a lot money?

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:58 | 5014188 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

It is considered a lot when paying for promises made to citizens.

It is pocket change when bailing out or pumping Wall Street.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:33 | 5014025 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

"I mean, when was the last time $75 billion was considered a lot money?"

$75bil. could produce a lot of guillotines. About one per American person.

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 16:00 | 5019327 JRobby
JRobby's picture

Just keep talking sexy like that.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:07 | 5013874 oddjob
oddjob's picture

Trust neither. Both sets of numbers argue the system can be saved.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:09 | 5013889 snodgrass
snodgrass's picture

I already told you not to worry. Obummer is importing millions of diseased immigrants which he will spread around the country in the same way smallpox blankets were given to the Indians. Those diseases will kill off the baby boomer (ie white) population so Medicare and Social Security won't go broke.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:28 | 5013872 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

$75 Billion short?  So what.

The FED slathered that on Wall Street once per month for over a year.

They can now give it to Social Security and retirees.

Why not? 

If it's good enough for Wall Street it should be just as good for real life citizens who actually paid into the system.

Heresy, I know (nice to see you Bruce).

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 23:17 | 5016014 ThroxxOfVron
ThroxxOfVron's picture

"$75 Billion short?  So what.

The FED slathered that on Wall Street once per month for over a year.

They can now give it to Social Security and retirees.

Why not? 

If it's good enough for Wall Street it should be just as good for real life citizens who actually paid into the system."

I'll say it again: Every single Bank and Corporation that was bailed out or propped should have been placed in trust to Social Security.  The Banking monopoly should have been entirely repatriated/expropriated and have become the funding mechanism for paying the benefits -and the taxation completely phased out by NOW.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:02 | 5013841 Big Ben
Big Ben's picture

I don't trust either one. The CBO has a long history of optimistic projections. And SS is even more optimistic than the CBO.

But why does Bruce keep focusing on SS when Medicare is an even bigger timebomb?

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:25 | 5013976 Bruce Krasting
Bruce Krasting's picture

Good question. I stay away from the health side of things because I think health is a much different issue than rich boomers retirement funds.

 

SS will scare us to death, but Medicare, Medicaid, Chips and Obamcare will kill us.

 

Better?

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 14:21 | 5018757 GubbermintWorker
GubbermintWorker's picture

Then you better eat right and stay in shape.

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 00:09 | 5016210 natty light
natty light's picture

Bootycare

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 21:42 | 5015552 malek
malek's picture

Yeah, but you should mention that the I&P is only 2.88% (or 4%, whatever) income tax increase to fix the smallest problem of all we have.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 17:12 | 5014538 Tall Tom
Tall Tom's picture

SS will scare us to death, but Medicare, Medicaid, Chips and Obamcare will kill us.

 

Then what is the problem? If we are doomed by Medicare, Medicaid, Chips and the Unaffordable Care Act then your entire essay is a moot issue.

 

It is called "priorities"???

 

Ebola will do us in before anything financial anyway.

 

Actually I do not believe that anything really matters at this point.

 

No disrespect intended. I believe that you believe that you are doing that which you think is best.

 

Very few have their priorities set straight.

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 14:20 | 5018750 GubbermintWorker
GubbermintWorker's picture

Ebola ain't the harbinger of death that you think it is. If it was air borne, yeah, that would be scary!

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 16:53 | 5014447 Rainman
Tue, 07/29/2014 - 15:59 | 5019316 JRobby
JRobby's picture

Many of the maxed out UI claimants jumped over to SS DI. Of course a bunch of lawyers set up shop to assist in filing and suing for denied claims.

Agree it should go broke soon enough.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 16:49 | 5014427 Oquities
Oquities's picture

Rich baby boomers?  Your populist bullshit adjusts to the times rapidly.  Piece of shit.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 18:43 | 5014951 max2205
max2205's picture

Agree...those fuckers are already collecting.   I'd much rather focus on double and triple dippers at the federal level and those at the state level who are bleeding us on property and state taxes

 

Stfu bruce

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 15:00 | 5013827 economessed
economessed's picture

Bruce - great to see you back - nobody wants to do anything about it because the only solution is to take away someone's free candy (or should I say "trust obligation?").  The Government isn't in the business of taking anything away (except for Veteran's services/benefits, that is).

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 15:56 | 5019288 JRobby
JRobby's picture

The argument is weed out the freeloaders. Good luck.

Let them say that people who have paid in since 1970 are getting dick and see what happens. No politician has them balls.

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 19:48 | 5015138 Greenskeeper_Carl
Greenskeeper_Carl's picture

didnt think it was that good of an article. The only solution is to say "sorry, we spent all that money, it wasnt set aside and invested for you, we blew it all on the welfare/warfare state, al thats left is IOUs from an insolvent govt"

dont think thats going to happen

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 18:31 | 5014881 Bossman1967
Bossman1967's picture

they also take away my money every quater and give it to such deserving free loaders? sorry for my comments if your just down on your luck but trying, elderly or disabled those groups I can only hope get my portion of taxes!

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 14:58 | 5013819 pashley1411
pashley1411's picture

Personally, I go to the White House website for my news and information.  

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 18:34 | 5014902 Hal n back
Hal n back's picture

The problem is that cbo recognized that payroll tax revenues , social security and medicare taxes, are declining.

Without reading the medicare or soc sec trust reports, i bet they did not account for a stagnant economy and choose rather to use the optimistic 4-5% gdp model with real employment improving, showing the ponzi continues.

Tue, 07/29/2014 - 15:53 | 5019268 JRobby
JRobby's picture

Half time jobs at half the pay reduces payroll tax collections hello.

1099 jobs with deductions of all sorts before self employment taxes calculated reduces payroll tax collections.

This was fucked in 2008 so six years later......................................

 

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 18:28 | 5014874 Bossman1967
Bossman1967's picture

Really? then you are reading the biggest lies out there. I sure hope thats a joke but don't see that you joking except the 9 likes you have and that's scary

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 21:44 | 5015559 t0mmyBerg
t0mmyBerg's picture

People struggled with email for the same reasons, you cant see the facial expressions so you lose some meaning.  I am pretty sure that was lazy sarcasm without the sarc tag.  Only somebody with an IQ of less than like 35 could make that statement seriously and there are arent that many people with that low an IQ, and they likely would not be commenting here.   So.....

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 22:20 | 5015731 Almost Solvent
Almost Solvent's picture

Deadpan delivery is dead

 

Mon, 07/28/2014 - 16:53 | 5014444 lordbyroniv
lordbyroniv's picture

I just ignore Bruces articles.

 

He is a STATIST.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!