Internationalists Are Pushing The World Towards Globally Engineered Economic Warfare

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Brandon Smith via,

Over a year ago I published an essay entitled 'The Linchpin Lie: How Global Collapse Will Be Sold To The Masses'. This essay addressed efforts by the ever malicious Rand Corporation to create a false narrative surrounding the possibility of global collapse. Linchpin Theory, as it was named by it's originator and Rand Corp. employee, John Casti, is I believe the very future of propaganda. Every engineered crisis needs a clever cover story, and in Linchpin Theory, we are told that all human catastrophe is a mere natural product of the “overcomplexity” within various systems. Yes, there is no accounting of false flag geopolitics or elitist conspiracy, no acknowledgment of deliberately initiated chaos; such things do not exist in the world of “linchpins”. Rather, the Rand Corporation would have us believe that the world is a massive game of Jenga, and the supporting pieces just remove themselves from the teetering structure by magical and coincidental causality.

Today, the linchpin lie is now being carefully inserted into the mainstream narrative. I can't say I was shocked to hear Alan Greenspan use its basic premise when he recently stated that:

I have come to the conclusion that bubbles…are a function of human nature. We don’t have enough observations, but my tentative hypothesis to what we’re dealing with is that both a necessary and sufficient condition for the emergence of a bubble is a protracted period of stable economic activity at low inflation. So it is a very difficult policy problem. I do believe that central banks that believe they can quell bubbles are living in a state of unrealism.”

It is important that we understand what Greenspan is actually doing here. The former Fed chairman is asserting that economic bubbles like the derivatives bubble of 2008 are a “natural function”, like the seasons, and are out of the control of central bankers. The truth is that central bankers have never tried to “quell” economic bubbles, they have been deliberately creating them in order to position the global economy into a crisis which they can then exploit. Greenspan is not only diverting blame for all the past and future economic crashes central banks have engineered, he is also setting the propaganda stage for a great change in the dynamic of the central banking concept - what the IMF's Christine Lagarde calls the “global economic reset”.

The current central banking structure gives the illusion of separation and sovereignty. Most people who have not researched the nature of the international banking cartel believe that the Federal Reserve, for instance, is a separate national entity from the Central Bank of Russia, or the Central Bank of China. They believe that these institutions act of their own accord rather than in concert with each other. The reality is, there is no Federal Reserve. There is no Central Bank of Russia. There are no separate entities. There are no Western banks and there are no BRICS. All of these banking edifices are merely front organizations for global financiers, as Council on Foreign Relations insider (and friend to the Rockefellers) Carroll Quigley made clear in his book, Tragedy And Hope:

"It must not be felt that the heads of the world's chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up, and who were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. "

A “global economic reset”, I suspect, will consist of a grand shift away from covert cooperation between central banks to an OPENLY centralized one world banking system, predicated on the concepts put forward by the IMF and led by the Bank of International Settlements, which has always been behind the scenes handing down commandments to the seemingly separate central banks of nations.

In order for this “reset” to be achieved, however, the establishment needs a historically monumental distraction. A distraction so confounding and terrifying that by the time the public has a chance to examine the situation rationally, the elites have already tightened the noose.

I have been warning ever since the beginning of the derivatives/debt collapse of 2007/2008 that the international financiers and globalists who created the artificially low interest rates and fiat lending bonanza would one day be required to fashion a considerably dangerous event in order to trigger the final collapse of the dollar based monetary system and replace it with a new currency (or basket of currencies), along with a new centralized financial authority.

This distracting event would have to rely on three very important strategies in order to succeed -

1) The use of what I call the “scattershot effect”; a swarm of smaller crises growing exponentially until it blurs together to create one dynamic calamity.

2) The use of multiple false paradigms in order to confuse the masses and pit them against one another in an absurd fight over fake and meaningless causes.

3) The use of deceptive benevolence on the part of the financial elite as they tap dance in to act as global “mediators”, ready to save the public from itself.

The end result would be a new brand of “world war” rather unique to history.

When most people imagine WWIII, they immediately envision images of nuclear bombs and mushroom clouds, however, I believe that when world war erupts, it may progress far differently from our cinematic assumptions. Regional conflicts are very likely, there is no doubt, but if one places himself in the shoes of the elites, one realizes that all out mechanized nuclear Armageddon is not really necessary to achieve the desired result of global governance.

Economic warfare alone could be extremely effective in initiating full spectrum fiscal implosion as well as mass starvation, mass panic, and mass desperation. All the signs lead me to believe that financial combat and 4th generation warfare will be used in the place of large armies and missiles.

The Scattershot Effect

Consider the sheer scope and number of crisis situations that have reached explosive proportions just in the past six months.

Syria continues to destabilize due to ISIS insurgents supported by the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and Israel; it is a horrifying storm which is now bleeding into other nations such as Iraq.

Iraq is on the verge of complete disintegration as the same western organized ISIS moves towards the outskirts of Baghdad.

Libya has imploded, with the American embassy evacuated, as well as the French and British, as various militias battle for supremacy.

The Ukraine crisis is nearing mutation into another beast entirely after the attack on Malaysian flight MH17. In just the past week, the EU has instituted sanctions against Russia, fighting has become even more fierce around Donetsk, Russia has been accused of firing artillery into Ukraine, and the U.S. now claims that Russia has violated the terms of the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces treaty.

In the meantime, the Federal Reserve continues to taper QE3 while ignoring the unprecedented equities bubble they have birthed in the stock market, as well as refusing to answer the question as to who will actually buy U.S. Treasury debt if they do not? Our secret friend from Belgium? And what if this secret friend is, as I suspect, actually the IMF/BIS global loan shark duo? What then? Do we become yet another third world African-style debtor owing our very infrastructure to a financial bureaucracy on the other side of the world?

And what about the Baltic Dry Index, one of the few measures of global shipping demand that cannot be manipulated by outside money interests? Well, the BDI is back down to historic lows, falling 65% since January, signaling that the so-called “economic recovery” is not at all what it is cracked up to be.

Add to this the deluge of illegal immigration on the southern border, aided by the Obama Administration, as well as possible presidential impeachment and lawsuit proceedings, and you have a recipe for total chaos of the fiscal variety.

If the first six to seven months of 2014 have been this frenetic, how bad will the next six months be?

False Paradigms

We are all aware of the prevalence of the false Left/Right paradigm in American politics. Hopefully most people in the Liberty Movement understand, for example, that any impeachment or lawsuit proceedings against Barack Obama will be nothing more than a crafted circus designed to accomplish nothing – a con game to placate conservatives with useless top-down solutions while the country burns around their ears.

There are other false paradigms that are not so clear to some, though...

The false Israel/Hamas paradigm has certainly duped a particular subsection of Americans and even a few patriots, even though it is historical fact that the creation of Hamas itself was funded and supported by the Israeli government. Why do Israeli politicians put money and arms at the disposal of Muslim extremist groups like Hamas and ISIS, only to enter into brutal conflict with them later? Could it be that the Israeli government does not have the best interests of the Israeli people at heart? Could it be that Israel is being used by internationalists as a catalyst for chaos? It is vital that we question the intentions behind such contrary actions in the Middle East.

Why has the U.S. government (Democrats and Republicans), Saudi Arabia, and Israel put support behind the ISIS caliphate in Iraq after spending decades of time, billions in resources, and thousands of lives, attempting to overrun and dominate the region? Why are these governments creating enemies that will later try to harm us?

It is all about false paradigms; dividing the masses into numerous conflicting sides and pitting them against each other when they should be fighting against the elites.

The false East/West paradigm is perhaps the most dangerous lie facing free men today. It is a lie that may very well define our generation if not our century. I have outlined in multiple articles the substantial evidence that proves beyond a doubt that Russia and China are members of the globalist agenda, and that the tensions between our two hemispheres are completely fabricated.

The latest announcement of a BRICS bank to rival the IMF is yet another scheme to perpetuate the illusion that the elites of these nations are at odds. In fact, the BRICS conference mission statement makes it clear that developing nations have no intention of breaking from the IMF (and certainly not the BIS). Instead, the BRICS bank is meant to provide “leverage” to “force” the IMF to become more inclusive, and hand over more power and participation. Vladimir Putin had this to say at the latest summit:

In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests. First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank's decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this.”

Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff insisted that the BRICS were not seeking to distance themselves from the Washington-based International Monetary Fund:

"On the contrary, we wish to democratize it and make it as representative as possible..."

Putin and the BRICS commonly rail against the “unipolar” financial system revolving around the U.S. dollar, but in the end they are only controlled opposition, and their solution is to place even more power into the hands of the IMF (a supposedly U.S. government controlled institution), creating a truly unipolar world order.  If the U.S. loses its IMF veto status this year due to lack of allocated funds, and the BRICS dump the dollar as world reserve, this may very well happen.

As sanctions between Russia and the U.S. snowball, a perfect rationalization for a dollar decoupling will be created that very few people would have believed possible only a few years ago.  It is only a matter of time before fiscal warfare escalates to destructive levels. Russia will inevitably cut off gas exports to the EU, and the BRICS will inevitably drop the U.S. dollar as a world reserve standard.

The U.S. relationship to the EU is also currently being presented as dubious, and this is not by accident. Failing relations between America and Germany are yet more theater for the masses to chew on. Western allies have been spying on each other for decades, but somehow the exposure of CIA activities in Germany is shocking news? The NY Fed suddenly attacks Deutsche Bank, seeking expanded monitoring and regulation? Germany's business interests are highly damaged by U.S. sanctions against Russia? It would seem as though someone is trying to create an artificial divide between elements of the EU and the U.S.

I believe that the narrative is being prepared for a faked financial breakup between the U.S. and many of its former allies, isolating the U.S., and destroying the dollar, but to what end? To answer that question, we must ask WHO ultimately benefits from these actions?

The Rise Of The Hero Bankers

In June of last year, the Bank of International Settlements, the central bank of central banks whose history began with the financial support of the Third Reich, released a statement warning that “easy money” from central banks was creating a dangerous bubble in stock markets around the world.

The IMF too has been pushing warnings of stock bubble collapse into the mainstream.

In June of this year, the BIS, a normally obscure and secretive organization, released another statement pronouncing that government had been led into a “false sense of security” by easy monetary policy and low interest rates, making the world economy perpetually unstable.

For an organization so covert and occult, the BIS sure has become rather candid lately. Frankly, I agree with everything they have said. However, I do not agree with the hypocrisy of the BIS, which dominates the decisions of all of its member banks, publicly criticizing policies which it most likely scripted itself. Why would the BIS suddenly denounce fiscal methods it used to promote? Because the BIS is setting itself up as the great prognosticator of a collapse that IT HELPED ENGINEER.

After the great financial war has subsided, and the people are suitably poverty stricken and desperate, it will be institutions like the BIS and IMF that swoop in to “save the day”. Their offer will be to consolidate economic control into the hands of an elite group of bankers “not affiliated” with any particular nation state, thereby insulating them from "political concerns". The argument will be that national sovereignty is a bane on the back of humanity. They will claim that the catastrophe will continue until we “simplify” and streamline our economic and political systems. They will present themselves as the heroes of the age; the ones who predicted the crisis would occur, and the ones who had a solution ready to save the day (after sufficient death and destruction, of course).

As long as people remain obsessed with false paradigms and faux enemies, the establishment's goal of complete centralized dominance will be predictably attainable. If we change our focus to the internationalists as the true danger instead of playing their game by their rules, then things will become far more interesting...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
kliguy38's picture

you AINT in the club!!

espirit's picture

De-globalization, Bitchez.

Bring it on.  Send the unwanted back home, keep our resources within reach.

Oh, and hang a bankster today!

malek's picture

Overcomplexity is the correct diagnosis. However it was caused deliberately, and is kept up purposefully to not allow view of the simple truths underlying it.

Historically overcomplexity was most of the time removed by major wars.
If we don't realize it and change course ourselves, it will happen that way again.

Anusocracy's picture

Overcomplexity = Government Bureaucracy = Massive Waste of Trillions of Man Hours of Labor

Raging Debate's picture

Anusocracy - I agree and time is money. Time is also the only commodity which cannot be bought so what was robbed cannot be replaced.

The article is concise on false narratives of east versus west. There was a 94 year old Reverend I spoke to back in 2009 from Canada. A shrewd, kind old owl type. He summed up governments (bankers and politicians same club why do you think Hillary Clinton wanted to be President of World Bank?) this way:

"Governments create chaos and make the people pay for it."

I think it is important to read material by highly decorated people that retired like Smedley Butler such as "War is a Racket".

I have come to realize that people pay the politicians to lie about ourselves collectively, that is there job and that is what tickles peoples ears so from that perspective it has a smidgeon of value in the political operators eyes.

All that said the Internet is a giant mirror we can no longer escape looking into it collectively. Ever look in your mirror at your home and not like what you see? It is most uncomfortable. You then have choices as the truth is right in front of you to take a more difficult path at first you know will be good for the long run or take what looks easy now but you know will pay for it later. Many choose the latter and we are human so I don't condemn. One loses twice not only from the results but by losing the evolutionary lesson offered and guaranteeing the same obstacles reemerging in the future. That is where we are at as a species now, being so interconnected all the time.

For political operatives, the choice was very easy because they directly do not pay any price in the long-term and they give the people what they want which is pain avoidance now for a steep price later. Such are drastically overpaid. It's analogous to paying a fast-food clerk $200 an hour to dole out tasty but destructive food (politician) while the grill cook (banker) makes $1,000 an hour and spiffs the clerk.

I appreciate those that educate like Brandon Smith in how the world really works, it enables proper perspectives to emerge and then decision making for posterity.

I see no reason to fight them or condone them. The people in Germany on the river Rhine had to deal with the Robber Barron's and there toll booths. They found alternative means of trade over time and life went on. However if ALL means of alternatives are now gone (and it may just be different this time) then I expect a real world war three. This will be from one or a few that breaks ranks in the aristocracy class. The BRICS may just do a total bait and switch. You might see Putin be a willing instrument of destruction by the bankers in regional conflict and then go full retard like Hitler. Or an American or Chinese version of the same story. That is because as human we are still playing king of the hill, it is our evolutionary tendency to still build government structures in the shape of a pyramid.

This is what 666 means in Revelations. It was the seal of Nero which he used to stamp the wax seal into. Consider Nero was 400 years after John of Patmos who wrote Revelations. 666 are geometric dimensions. 6x6x6x is a pyramid, monarchy. Makes you think of the pyramids and pharoahs doesn't it?

Government systems are tools. Man creates other tools using better dimensions like A/C power generation using a circular design. This is what needs to be built after the next world war. All I can do is educate a few with an ear and get out of the way best I can for when elephants dance, ants get trampled. The only good news is we are now in the last stages of evolution. After 12,000 years of pyramid management which always ends in colossal failure and suffering we'll build a better system but we won't need it long for we are evolving back to energy, back to the garden (que Crosby, Stills and Nash 'Stardust').

Did you know that solar cycles create disturbances in our magnetic field causing it to wobble, creating increased volcanism and polar wander? That began in 26 A.D. and culminated in 2012. Despite some casualties from nasty weather and tsunamis (caused by earth axis shifting 1-2 degrees) we're all still here despite all the fear mongering. Also couple other correlations for interest sake. 2012 was the Year of the Dragon in Chinese zodiac. 2012 was the end of the age of Pisces, a troubled sign and the beginning of the Age of Aquarius means "water of life". Christ said "I am with you till the end of this age." In greek age was aeon and related to astrological symbols. Those Christians with the fish symbol don't realize that is the sign of Pisces. That age begin in 26 AD and ended in 2012 in the western zodiac. This age will end with a pop and it plays out over decades as a transition, not one singular event. There is plenty of good news but between now and 2022 hedge with food, water and arms to defend that and help all you can mitigate the suffering. God bless all of you of all nations and peoples. I ask forgiveness for being misled to hate Russians or Chinese. I now know better. But now the world is being misled to hate the West, hate Americans. What a waste of time when we could be focusing on our final evolution. What good is winning the whole world when you lose yourself, shit your pants then die at 80-90?

Thank you for allowing me a voice here to discuss such things. The real problem with the current NWO is there is no democratic process involved so with no political voice I must choose to defend my interests locally. There is no Republic either meaning two sets of laws, one for the owners and one for the citizen. Therefore I must follow natural law, of what is good or bad in my heart.

Seek_Truth's picture

"This is what 666 means in Revelations (sic)"

No it doesn't. Here is what 666 means:

“He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.” -Revelation 13:16-18

What is this “mark”, and what is the wisdom that reveals the meaning of “If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666”?

"Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was 666 talents of gold..."
1 Kings 10:14

“Now the weight of gold which came to Solomon in one year was 666 talents of gold…” -2 Chronicles 9:13

The only other Scriptural mention of 666 is in the above two verses from the Old Testament. It is of note that these verses refer to Solomon, who in his early rulership as King of the united 12 tribes of Israel and Judah was noted for his righteous, godly, wisdom. But his later years, the beginnings of which are recorded in the verses quoted above, give a completely different picture. Continue reading in 2 Chronicles 9:13-29:

Solomon’s Wealth and Power
Now the weight of gold which came to Solomon in one year was 666 talents of gold, besides that which the traders and merchants brought; and all the kings of Arabia and the governors of the country brought gold and silver to Solomon. King Solomon made 200 large shields of beaten gold, using 600 shekels of beaten gold on each large shield. He made 300 shields of beaten gold, using three hundred shekels of gold on each shield, and the king put them in the house of the forest of Lebanon. Moreover, the king made a great throne of ivory and overlaid it with pure gold. There were six steps to the throne and a footstool in gold attached to the throne, and arms on each side of the seat, and two lions standing beside the arms. Twelve lions were standing there on the six steps on the one side and on the other; nothing like it was made for any other kingdom. All King Solomon’s drinking vessels were of gold, and all the vessels of the house of the forest of Lebanon were of pure gold; silver was not considered valuable in the days of Solomon. For the king had ships which went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram; once every three years the ships of Tarshish came bringing gold and silver, ivory and apes and peacocks.
So King Solomon became greater than all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom. And all the kings of the earth were seeking the presence of Solomon, to hear his wisdom which God had put in his heart. They brought every man his gift, articles of silver and gold, garments, weapons, spices, horses and mules, so much year by year. Now Solomon had 4,000 stalls for horses and chariots and 12,000 horsemen, and he stationed them in the chariot cities and with the king in Jerusalem. He was the ruler over all the kings from the Euphrates River even to the land of the Philistines, and as far as the border of Egypt. The king made silver as common as stones in Jerusalem, and he made cedars as plentiful as sycamore trees that are in the lowland. And they were bringing horses for Solomon from Egypt and from all countries.

Note how EVERY number above ten is mentioned in 100s or 1,000s, EXCEPT 666. Also note how 666 is “forced” as a unique number, that is, it is mentioned before the EXCEPTION of the additional gold brought from “besides that which the traders and merchants brought; and all the kings of Arabia and the governors of the country brought gold and silver to Solomon.” NOWHERE ELSE in the annals of the Kings is a number “forced” or not rounded. ALL other numbers are rounded to the nearest hundred or thousand. This is very significant.

Now compare Deuteronomy 17:14-17:

The King
When you enter the land the LORD your God is giving you and have taken possession of it and settled in it, and you say, "Let us set a king over us like all the nations around us," be sure to appoint over you the king the LORD your God chooses. He must be from among your own brothers. Do not place a foreigner over you, one who is not a brother Israelite. The king, moreover, must not acquire great numbers of horses for himself or make the people return to Egypt to get more of them, for the LORD has told you, "You are not to go back that way again." He must not take many wives, or his heart will be led astray. He must not accumulate large amounts of silver and gold.

Take careful notice that the King, in this case Solomon, broke God’s laws:

The king was not to obtain great numbers of horses for himself (Solomon had 4,000 stalls for horses, and 12,000 horsemen).

The king, nor his people, were not to return to Egypt for more horses, but “they were bringing horses for Solomon from Egypt”.

Solomon was not accumulate large amounts of silver and gold, yet he made silver as common as stones, and gold vessels and ornaments abounded in his kingdom.

Solomon was not to take many wives, but Solomon took 700 wives and 300 concubines:

“Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women, from the nations concerning which the LORD had said to the sons of Israel, “You shall not associate with them, nor shall they associate with you, for they will surely turn your heart away after their gods.” Solomon held fast to these in love. He had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines, and his wives turned his heart away. For when Solomon was old, his wives turned his heart away after other gods; and his heart was not wholly devoted to the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father had been. For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians and after Milcom the detestable idol of the Ammonites. Solomon did what was evil in the sight of the LORD, and did not follow the LORD fully, as David his father had done. Then Solomon built a high place for Chemosh the detestable idol of Moab, on the mountain which is east of Jerusalem, and for Molech the detestable idol of the sons of Ammon. Thus also he did for all his foreign wives, who burned incense and sacrificed to their gods.” - 1 Kings 11:1-8

So Solomon, the man on whom god bestowed righteous, godly wisdom in his early years as King, turned from God, and instead became filled with unrighteous, wicked, selfish “wisdom” and its desires. He became an idol worshipper, idolizing his power, wealth, and sex. He became the prototypical beast of Revelation, after whose example all successive beasts have patterned themselves, idolizing and worshipping power, wealth, and sex, rather than God.

Solomon was the prototype, the original, 666, a man who would be "god". He relied on his earthly "wisdom", rather than on true wisdom from God.

In this way he prefigured all who forge ahead (without God, against God), in their own "wisdom", rather than relying on God.

Raging Debate's picture

Seek_Truth - Revelations is a book about the end of an age, I assume you have read the entirety of it? It discusses governments and there behavioe in great detail. What I provided was an indicator regarding 666 which is geometry other scripture in Revelations is an angel showing John a "New Jerusalem" using a measuring stick for the dimensions of that place.

It is interesting in the above reference about a New Jerusalem that the only other place in the bible 666 is mentioned is Solomon who built the first temple in Jerusalem.

But I disagree with your general opinion on the matter. Readers here should read Revelations on there own in it's entirety. I am a Pandeist which if you read the bible what Christ was. It is a scientific approach to biblical writing than theological which is how Christians endlessly argue. On that matter I refer to Paul who when writing to churches arguing over theology "Above all use reason."

As for the mark of the beast, the micro-chip for such was invented by a company called Digital Angel. I believe the year was 1997. In any event it was bought out or changed it's name to Veriteq:

I have seen your arguments that the mark of the beast is symbolic that it isn't a skin or forehead implant of this chip but a general trade pattern usong barcodes that was already implemented. I disagree with that argument also. Forget which country has implemented the implant but pretty sure it was Bosnia. A trial balloon of acceptance. I also see no refute on the historic, non-biblical reference of the seal of Nero, " the empire that was" as the Roman empire referenced by the angel to John. Again, readers should read the entire book of Revelations themselves. You did not debate the correlationa of other cultures such as the Greek or Chinese zodiacs nor did you address the science of solar cycles 26 A.D. to 2012. There is more information to cross-reference then one book you know. There scientific literature, historic literature, news all kinds of neat stuff.

SuperRay's picture

Maybe we should ask Gandalf...

Seek_Truth's picture

First of all it's NOT "Revelations (sic)", it's Revelation.
Second, it takes a lot more than reading Revelation once or a couple of times.
Third, it takes studying the entire Bible along with historical and current events. (Repeatedly, with meditation and organized note keeping).
Fourth, it takes prayer for God's Holy Spirit, to reveal the meaning of Biblical prophecy.
Fifth, given the above, the Bible is self contained, it contains everything necessary to interpret itself if one follows the aforementioned statements.
Finally, it takes time (lots of it), diligence, and sincerity to understand the Bible.

To illustrate yet again how wrong Biblical know nothings are regarding the mark, or seal, on the forehead:

What is the Mark, or Seal, or Name of The Beast on the forehead mentioned in Revelation? Are there other marks on the forehead discussed in Scripture?

Upon searching the Scriptures for the keyword “Forehead”, we find 24 Scriptures where the word is found.
Nine of these verses refer to a different context than our intended purpose (Lev 13:41-43; Num 24:17, 1 Sam 17:49; 2 Chron 26:19-20; Jer 48:45; Ezek 3:9; Isa 48:4)
That leaves 15 Scriptures to study:
1. Exodus 13:9
This observance will be for you like a sign on your hand and a reminder on your forehead that this law of the LORD is to be on your lips. For the LORD brought you out of Egypt with his mighty hand.
2. Exodus 13:16
And it will be like a sign on your hand and a symbol on your forehead that the LORD brought us out of Egypt with his mighty hand.”
3. Exodus 28:36-38
Make a plate of pure gold and engrave on it as on a seal: HOLY TO THE LORD. Fasten a blue cord to it to attach it to the turban; it is to be on the front of the turban. It will be on Aaron’s forehead, and he will bear the guilt involved in the sacred gifts the Israelites consecrate, whatever their gifts may be. It will be on Aaron’s forehead continually so that they will be acceptable to the LORD.
4. Deuteronomy 6:6-8
These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads.
5. Deuteronomy 11:18
Fix these words of mine in your hearts and minds; tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads.
Notice that Aaron’s plate was worn on a turban on the forehead, but none of these were literal marks on the forehead or hand. What did they mean? “That this law of the LORD is to be on your lips”, “that the LORD brought us out of Egypt with his mighty hand”, “so that they will be acceptable to the LORD”, “These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Talk about them…”, “Fix these words of mine in your hearts and minds”. The message is clear- to have this figurative “mark on the forehead/hand meant that they were to constantly meditate on and talk about God’s commandments, His mighty acts of salvation, to love Him with all their heart and mind. What kind of people would do this? People who are acceptable to the LORD. Were these marks literal? No.
Now let’s look at prophetic instances of the “Mark”:
6. Ezekiel 9:4
and said to him, “Go throughout the city of Jerusalem and put a mark on the foreheads of those who grieve and lament over all the detestable things that are done in it.”
7. Revelation 7:3
“Do not harm the land or the sea or the trees until we put a seal on the foreheads of the servants of our God.”
8. Revelation 9:4
They were told not to harm the grass of the earth or any plant or tree, but only those people who did not have the seal of God on their foreheads.
9. Revelation 14:1
[ The Lamb and the 144,000 ] Then I looked, and there before me was the Lamb, standing on Mount Zion, and with him 144,000 who had his name and his Father’s name written on their foreheads.
10. Revelation 20:4
I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
11. Revelation 22:4
They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads.
12. Revelation 20:4
I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
These prophetic Scriptures refer to past events as well as current/future events. Notice who gets this mark? People who “grieve and lament over all the detestable things that are done”, “are servants of our God”, and they are “not to (be) harm(ed)”. What kind of people are these? People who are acceptable to the LORD. Were these marks in Ezekiel literal? No. So, for thousands of years these “marks” are not literal. Should we then expect that the “mark” on the foreheads of the servants of God would be literal? Of course not. This “ Mark” is figurative- it indicates that one is acceptable to God, a servant of God.
The name, or mark of The Harlot:
13. Revelation 17:5
Babylon the Great (as covered elsewhere in this publication) is a figurative entity. She is the world “money power” – the fiat currency, fractional reserve, financial, monetary, credit system that the governments, merchants and nations rely on and are seduced by. This mark, or name, is again, figurative. All those who worship Mammon, Money, wealth, riches and the power it brings have this mark.
The mark of The Beast (out of the earth):
14. Revelation 13:18
It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.
This scripture refers to the beast out of the earth. It has 2 horns like a lamb, but speaks like a dragon. It exercises all the authority of the 1st beast (out of the sea). It makes the earth’s inhabitants worship the first beast, whose fatal wound had been healed. It performs great signs, causing fire to come down from heaven. It deceived the people of earth, ordered them to set up an image to the first beast that was wounded yet lived. It gives breath to the image of the first beast so that the image could speak and cause all who refuse to worship the image of the first beast to be killed.
15. Revelation 14:9
A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: “If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand,

The beast out of the sea is the world’ political governments, as elaborated on elsewhere in Revelation, Daniel, etc. The beast out of the earth is another figurative entity. Since these Beasts are figurative entities, will this mark of the beast be literal or figurative? This mark, or seal, is again, figurative. It represents the way a human lives their life- in obedience to God, or obedience to something else. Those are the “marks” or “seals” discussed in Revelation. “Blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.”-Luke 11:28

Now try comprehending the above, remember, it's going to take time, something that most will never dedicate to even understanding the importance of the above information.

I have spent the vast majority of my life studying this, well over four decades on eschatology alone, so excuse me if I am unimpressed with the understanding of Biblical prophesy entertained by neophytes such as yourself.

Raging Debate's picture

Seek_Truth - Your arguments have now devolved to ad hominem. If your trying to teach, how can you draw students with that approach?

You made an assumption I have not read the bible cover to cover. I read the bible cover to cover four times. Like Christ, I like to to teach like him. He did not drown his listeners to endless citing of verse. People know wisdom when they hear it especially when used with effective use of questions and analogies (used to be referenced as parables). If the people in general have 't read the literature for themselves to form there own opinion as I encouraged how does citing verses help?

"Revelations" refers to plurality of the visions, splitting hairs over the singularity of the book title does not make your interpretation of the subject matter any more valid. You did not address the historic, Greek or Chinese cultural or scientific corollaries mentioned in tying up the ending of an age which was my point. 666 is an additional biblical indicator of the timeline. However, doctors, lawyers, scientists and accountants all use three or four data points in analysis to form theory which is what I postulated. Your using one source, one data point which is barely above 50% accuracy - in other words your guessing. Flipping a theological coin for forty years does not result in truth. At four data points, statistical analysis is close to 90%. Then the scientific method should be used against the theory which theologists tend to ignore (why I loved that Reverend in Canada who did do this).

Prophecy is statistical probability at the quantum level. It involves thousands of data points. I like reading literature from a lot of places including Bhuddism, Hinduism, Quantum Physics, Economics, Politics and History. I am a Pandeist and that is what I concluded Christ also was. I no longer attend church to have endless debate over scripture (As Paul said "above all use reason" on his writing to squabbling churches) and being told by Assembly of God drinking is not permitted. So Christ and apostles can get buzzed on wine but I can't? Organized religion is a bane, it was argued against by Christ himself. How about Catholic Priests being forbidden to marry? Peter had a vision of a religion that would do such running contrary to nature "be fruitful, become many fill the earth."
It is ironic that the Catholic church built there denomination on Peter, The Rock' as Christ called him but they ignored Peter's own admonishment in this important regard. Maybe, the Priests wouldn't be molesting alter boys. But let's throw around more bible verse!

It is written in the old testament that you will know a prophet by if what he says comes true. Many here have seen my repeated mention of the Yuan becoming reserve currency and other financial matters. My intent is not vanity but mitigation of suffering and promotion of posterity. What is your intentions? I have never seen you state them.

In any event I prefer the title statistical analysts which is part of what I do for daytime work over "prophet" which makes one sound eccentric and outdated. The title prophet is outdated so your use of clinging to it does not seem conducive to teaching, using 1st century and prior terms and titles in the 21st century. No wonder people do not wish to read the bible cover to cover.

flapdoodle's picture

It seems to me there is a category of people that worship formulas. If you run into someone like that, flee!

Those who take religious dogma too seriously fall into that category, as do ideologues, and most scientists.

Alfred Korzybski had the ultimate antidote to formula worship, which IMHO should be everyones guiding light (or course, in so doing I fall into the same trap!).

So even if its not your quiding light, one needs to take to heart the Korzybski's admonition (popularized by Timoth Leary)

The map is not the territory

All formulas, all books all "knowledge" is just maps which try to make some sense of this world, but in themselves are just, well, maps.

mc225's picture

--the map is not the territory--   did a.e. van vogt get that from korzybski or vice versa?

Seek_Truth's picture

So far you’ve made the following claims regarding Bible prophecies that are demonstrably false:

1-      666 is Nero’s seal and a pyramid, etc. See above for proof you are wrong.

2-      The Mark of the Beast is a microchip. See above for proof you are wrong.

3-      Jesus is/was a pantheist. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of YHWH, the Father. He is therefore a Monotheist, just as all true Christians are. The writings of the early church fathers- Justin Martyr, for example, make this clear.


1-      I never assumed anything regarding how many times you've read the Bible. Your admission that you read it only 4 times is admission enough that you are a novice/neophyte when it comes to understanding the Bible.

2-      You say that Christ “did not drown his listeners to endless citing of verse”. Yet Christ quoted the Old Testament at least 78 times : He quoted it precisely for the same reasons I quote it: understanding prophecy.

3-      You asked: “If the people in general have 't (sic) read the literature for themselves to form there (sic) own opinion as I encouraged how does citing verses help? Answer: That is precisely why I quoted every relevant Scripture, so that even novices such as yourself could take the time to read, comprehend, and meditate on those Scriptures immediately, rather than taking decades to put them together after much research. “Their own opinion” is a moot point, as all sincere persons praying for Holy Spirit will come to the same conclusion. I have personally witnessed this.

4-      You stated: “Your (sic) using one source, one data point which is barely above 50% accuracy - in other words your (sic) guessing.” Answer: And you are using screwdrivers, chisels, clamps and a chainsaw, when a chainsaw alone does a cleaner, quicker, truer job. All that useless stuff gets in the way and prevents you from getting to the goal you seek. To interpret the Bible, God’s word, one uses the Bible. The Bible itself reveals this: “and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets; for God is not a God of confusion…” – (1 Corinthians 14:32,33). “All Scripture {no other source} is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” – (2 Timothy 3:16,17). “This will be my third visit to you. "Every matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."” – (2 Corinthians 13:1) What two or three witnesses would be better than the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit? The Bible is the word of God, and it itself is used to interpret the Bible- not some outside, pagan, non inspired source.

Having said all that- As far as denominations (which are actually franchises), drinking (which is just fine, Drunkenness is the sin, just as eating is fine yet Gluttony is a sin), pederasts, claims of Peter “founding” the Catholic church (that would be Constantine in the 4th century), we are 100% in agreement.

As you alluded to- true interpretations of prophecy come true, false interpretations do not. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

Time is running short, the Sixth Seal will be opened next Spring, rapidly followed by the following chapters of Revelation (not Revelations, lol). Believers and mockers alike will see these things occur.

You asked: What is my intention? My intention is to make these things known.

I have given you enough information to make a great leap forward in your understanding of Biblical prophecy. What you do with it is up to you.

For the vast majority in this PC world, this_sums_things_up.


Felix da Kat's picture

In Kabballa, the letter "W" has a numerical value of six. This is why the term "World Wide Web" was chosen. All internet users acquiesce to the "666".

DoChenRollingBearing's picture

This article is long and complicated, and I cannot address it adequately other than offering some observations on the "BRICS Bank".  The author is right that the "BRICS Bank" is dependent on US dollars (uh, gold is not mentioned in any of the founding documents), and that their two new institutions (the New Develpment Bank: "NDP" and the Contigent Reserve Arrangement: "CRA") look a lot like the World Bank and the IMF...

It's in the treaties!  See below for some details:

"The BRICS Bank: A First Look"

Ghordius's picture

agree. adequately? one comment alone can't address, only scratch the surface

the article also steers towards this very curious meme that is circulating, i.e. "it's all kabuki"

I presume it has it's roots in the criticism of the political party duopoly, where it's "they are both the same", and in the simplicism of "don't bother to..."

investment banking and capital markets are fundamentally a different thing from traditional banking, for example, and only in the sphere of influence of Wall Street and the City of London this distinction is difficult to make, yet this influence is global, but not total

as the influence of the West, or the influence of the mentioned Rand Corp, or the influence of the FED, etc. etc.

yes, some entities and polities pretend to be more independent or sovereign that what they really are, yet this is the very source of every independence or sovereignty. it starts with a claim, like a teenager telling it's parents that he wants to live in his own place asap, or a bunch of unimportant, underpopulated colonies stirring revolutionary and independentist thoughts. and sometimes it's in potentia, patiently waiting it's turn and time

smaller participants, be them countries, corporations, banks or even many oligarchs, often follow the flow. or accept - temporarily - some of the game rules of the bigger participants. it's easy to paint them as "fixture" of the bigger participant's game, then, but take their influence away...

what's that smell's picture

"do you want to hear the story of right hand left hand?..."


Oracle 911's picture

Gold is not mentioned in publicly available documents (fixed for ya). Because there can be some secret documents and agreement between founding states. I know these things are hardly kept in secret to long, but it can be kept secret long enough in front of public. Anyway with enough (insider) information and with working brain anybody can figure out what is going on, but for details you need well intelligence/espionage.

Not to mention both parties want the circus go on, at least now:

1st The west/banking cartel want preserve  the status quo which means keeping the US$ and other Ponzi scheme on at whatever cost, and than on right time collapse everything (and after sacrifice of some scapegoats) present themselves as saviors and the bringer of good times (it would be the worst dictatorship ever).

2nd The BRICS want buy every real asset (production capacities, companies with interesting patent, commercial buildings, gold silver, farmland etc)  for these paper currencies at reasonable (cheap?) price. When nothing they will blow up the system.


Now and the question: Who have the better plan, better execution and the support from above?

zhandax's picture

Are publicly-registered documents that at least two of the signatories are amassing record gold purchases of significance?

Oracle 911's picture

China and Russia (the governments) are buying gold like crazy, last time it was about 19 tones of gold bought by Russia. And about 600 tones goes trough Swiss gold refineries yearly. Not to mention the rumored Russian "two-headed eagle" gold coin.


So, yes they are documents, but they are not telling the purpose of the gold buying. One way or another, they are preparing for something big.



I forgot to mention in my previous post, this current system is not good for BRICS countries too. So they will collapse it to, in the right time and it is a closer date than the Western scheme. BUT they are offering a alternative which will be economically better (some kind of international workers cooperative) but I don't know if it will be a freer system.

ramacers's picture

just ready the blade. a few baskets with heads in them can work wonders.

ekm1's picture



"It must not be felt that the heads of the world's chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up, and who were perfectly capable of throwing them down"



Will you be convinced now that Fed per se has zero power, or do I have to continue over and over and over to repeat it?

ekm1's picture

This is De-globalization due to De-Dollarization.


Globalization cannot survive without a single world currency as reserve.


De-dollarization leads to De-globalization

which leads to reduction of world trade

which leads to world economic contraction

which leads to economic misery

which leads to ........expansion of wars in the world


It is that simple.

Careful what you wish for, seeing world pursuing de-dollarization due to Voluntary Military Disengagement by USA.

robertocarlos's picture

It doesn't have to lead to war. Americans should take their reduced living standard like men.

ekm1's picture

All world suffers from reduction of world trade.

Assuming americans do, other parts of the world won't which would lead to local wars which would lead to less and less trade


Worse for all

old naughty's picture

eh, think out of the Matrix...

will universal trade suffers from reduction of world trade, it's not likely that they have BDI?

Assuming americans do, other parts of the universe won't...

Alien warning of reset

Truth (hope) is out there.

Phoenix Rising: Vision of a New America
zhandax's picture

Best thing that could happen is this country becomes a trade pariah and starts making their own shit again.  You can bet that is not part of the master plan.

Anusocracy's picture


There is a worldwide contraction coming because of Fed printing, government growth, government debt, government obligations, lack of free trade, technological advances, among other things.

This will expose government for the failure that it is and war is the cover story the governments will use to avoid blame.

AGoldhamster's picture

"which leads to economic misery"

RUBBISH - the opposite is true - because jobs and manufacturing will come back.

But of course it will hurt some oligarchs.

(noteworthy you care about oligarchs - should we start whining now?)

LetThemEatRand's picture

Divide and conquer.  An oldie but a goodie.

homme's picture

Have chainsaw. Will travel.

SelfGov's picture

The power of the "elites" comes from fossil fuels.

The switches and levers they normally use to make things happen with have less and less of an effect as net energy declines.

Don't fear the elites. Fear thermodynamics.

Dapper Dan's picture

The following is essential in filling in gaps and answering questions. Whether or not you've read this masterpiece in the past, it is worth another look. If you are like me, you will find something new that you didn't see before.

DoChenRollingBearing's picture


Many of FOFOA's past articles continue to amaze me.

SelfGov's picture

Great read!

It is interesting to note that US peak production preceded almost every single significant event mentioned in that blog post.

blindman's picture

Buckminster Fuller - Everything I Know - session 06 (entire) - January 25, 1975

ramacers's picture

was only able to watch a small chunk of this today. but, man, what a gem. kudos. i get it.

Raging Debate's picture

Blindman - Great link! Love Buckminster Fuller's methods of creating theory by comparing one science verses another such as biology and physics. In this case a trade verse physics.

Leonard Susskind was a plumber that became a great quantum theorist. He beat Stephen Hawking in proving that informarion stored in energy that passed through a black hole would not be destroyed (see the Black Hole War).

Cacete de Ouro's picture

The Group of Thirty

Who devised the Group of Thirty (G30)? - David Rockefeller

"Geoffrey L Bell, who founded the Group of Thirty at the invitation – and with the money – of the Rockefeller Foundation, commented, “The idea of ‘30’ was to have a good cross-section of people from around the world… but not so many that you couldn’t have a good discussion.”

Kirk2NCC1701's picture

Ah, a "Financial Sanhedrin".
So, who's Caiaphas?

Cacete de Ouro's picture

who is Caiaphas?

Well, given that the central banker agents are obviously not Caiaphas, then the financiers and instigators would spring to mind; Rockefellers and possibly Schroders.

NoDecaf's picture

"everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face"


this applies to central planners as well.

gobsmack's picture

Excellent. I'm at a loss though how to hit them. What would be the right cross? The uppercut? Haymaker?

Jack Burton's picture

To be honest, nobody has yet come up with a plausable explaination of what the Untied States and Israeli government is trying to do on the world stage. In the past several years they have sought to destroy countries, support terrorists and foment wars as fast as they can. The ultimate exposure of their drive to spread war is Washington and Israel's success in gaining a nazi coup in Kiev and then demanding that the coup use military forces to attack and destroy 8 million ethnic Russians who inhabit the Donbass. That war is now offered Washington a chance to start a new cold war and even a proxy direct attack on Russia.

Somebody in Washington is seeking chaos and war across vast regions, and using the CIA, NSA, Israel, The State Department, Military Intelligence and Special forces to sow destruction.

Who is it, and what is their end game plan? I have yet to find the plausable answer to that. But the USA support for ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and a Nazi minority in West Ukraine seems to point to the military industrial complex seeking endless war and threats of war to ensure their control over America and grand profits from war making. Bankers and Israel are also the right hand of whoever is doing these acts.

If you figure out just who is behind it, let me know.

LetThemEatRand's picture

You already hit on/called the answer.  MIC and bankers are behind it.

The End Game is global domination.  In today's world there are still rules that apply to these guys, however watered down.  In tomorrow's world, they aim to live completely outside the rules.  Like all royalty through the ages.   It's no conspiracy theory to say that there are those among us who want to live unrestrained by all rules and law.  The last couple of hundred years were an anomoly.

Chief Wonder Bread's picture

'They' live completely outside the rules now.

Anusocracy's picture

This applies to the 'democratic' order of the world's governments - except that the BRICS want to secede.

Iron law of oligarchy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The iron law of oligarchy is a political theory, first developed by the German sociologist Robert Michels in his 1911 book, Political Parties.[1] It claims that rule by an elite, or oligarchy, is inevitable as an "iron law" within any democratic organization as part of the "tactical and technical necessities" of organization.[1] Michels used anecdotes from political parties and trade unions, who supported democratic reforms to build his argument in 1911. Michels particularly addressed the application of this law to representative democracy, and stated: "It is organization which gives birth to the dominion of the elected over the electors, of the mandataries over the mandators, of the delegates over the delegators. Who says organization, says oligarchy."[1] He went on to state that "Historical evolution mocks all the prophylactic measures that have been adopted for the prevention of oligarchy."[1] Michels stated that the official goal of representative democracy of eliminating elite rule was impossible, that representative democracy is a façade legitimizing the rule of a particular elite, and that elite rule, that he refers to as oligarchy, is inevitable.[1] Later Michels migrated to Italy and joined Benito Mussolini's Fascist Party, as he believed was the next legitimate step of modern societies. The thesis became popular once more in post-war America with the publication of Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union (1956) and during the red scare brought about by McCarthyism.