The Financialization Of American Business: How Cheap Debt Fuels The Bubble, Not Growth

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

Monetary central planning is failing to achieve Keynesian “escape velocity” because it has deeply impaired the engines of capitalist enterprise. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the grotesque financialization of American business that has occurred since the 1980s. As usual, this deformation is rooted in the massive growth of debt carried by non-financial businesses.

As shown below, non-financial business debt (corporate and non-corporate) has increased by nearly 8X since 1982 or at almost double the growth rate of GDP. Accordingly, the ratio of total business debt to GDP has risen from 53% to 81% over the last 32 years.

Tower of Business Debt - Click to enlarge

Tower of Business Debt – Click to enlarge

Needless to say, this debt tsunami was not devoted to investment in productive assets and therefore future growth and productivity. Especially since central bank money printing came to dominate the financial markets after the mid-1990s, the rate of real net business investment in the US economy has actually gone in the opposite direction—exhibiting an unprecedented decline. And in this context it is important to emphasize that the appropriate metric is net investment after current period consumption of capital is accounted for—- not gross CapEx as is measured in the GDP accounts and touted by Wall Street economists.

The latter measure is a Keynesian delusion based on “flow” economics. That is, the proposition that current quarter “spending” is all that counts because it helps to fill the bathtub of GDP closer to the rim of its purported full-employment potential.

But that ignores business cycle history and the productive structure of the economy. If a central bank induced financial bubble and bust has caused a deep economic slump, as it did in 2008-2009, and business investment has resultantly been sharply curtailed, that pull-back of current CapEx outlays does not stop the wear and tear on the business sector’s plant, equipment and other tools of production. Accordingly, during the recovery up-turn gross CapEx needs to compensate for recession shortfalls in capital replacement, as well as current period depreciation.

By contrast, when nominal CapEx does not cover accumulated depreciation - then the economy’s seed corn is being consumed. What results is a circumstance in which the headline readers on bubblevision breathlessly report a quarterly uptick in fixed business investment, but remain clueless to the possibility that it actually measures an erosion of productive capacity after accounting for deprecation, amortization and the inflation gap between current replacement prices for capital assets and their historic accounting basis.

In fact, that is exactly what has been happening since 1998. The modest recovery of business CapEx in each upturn has not been sufficient to cover cumulative capital consumption plus an increment for capacity growth. Accordingly, the trend level of real business investment spending has been heading south for the last 17 years, and now stands 20% below its turn of the century levels.

Real Business Investment - Click to enlarge

Real Business Investment – Click to enlarge

There can be no mystery, therefore, as to how the American business sector has deployed its vast accumulation of debt. It has overwhelmingly gone into financial engineering - that is, into the strip-mining of equity from the business sector by means of stock buybacks, LBOs and cash M&A takeovers. By definition, these maneuvers confer windfalls on equity holders, but add nothing to productive capacity.

During the years since the December 2007 pre-crisis peak, this trend has been especially apparent. Non-financial business debt outstanding has soared from $11 trillion to $14 trillion or by  nearly 30%. Yet, as is evident in the chart above, real net investment is still well below its 2007 level. Indeed, even gross business investment in plant and equipment is 5% below its prior peak.

By contrast, stock buybacks and M&A volumes have come roaring back. The former is now up by 5X from the 2009 bottom and is approaching its 2007 blow-off level.


Debt fueled M&A deals are also back at levels which resulted in massive restructurings and jobs cuts when the macro-economy turned down in 2008-2009. The potential for a reoccurrence is evident in the data for leveraged loans.

The continuous recycling of cash strip-mined from the balance sheets of American business into stock purchases has fueled the over-valuation of corporate equity in a major way. This is captured in the vast expansion of the unlevered enterprise value or TEV of non-financial corporations (debt plus market value of equity per the Fed’s flow-of-funds report). In effect, corporations lever up their balance sheets with debt and use the proceeds to goose the market value of their stock. The TEV measure captures both phases of the maneuver.
Accordingly, the TEV of non-financial corporations has literally exploded since the advent of monetary central planning, rising from $2.5 trillion in 1982 to to nearly $31 trillion at present. That represents a stunning gain of 12X over the period:
Total Enterprise Value Non-Financial Corporations - Click to enlarge

Total Enterprise Value Non-Financial Corporations – Click to enlarge

Obviously, neither GDP nor business value added has grown at anything like these rates during the last 30 years. As measured as a share of GDP, for example, the TEV of non-financial corporations has soared from 70% to 170% of GDP since 1982.

Total Enterprise Value of NonFinancial Corporations Ratio to GDP - Click to enlarge

Total Enterprise Value of NonFinancial Corporations Ratio to GDP – Click to enlarge

It goes without saying that this trend embodies a destructive cycle of financialization.  Rather than functioning as a dynamic engine of growth in productivity, enterprise and real wealth, the American business sector has become a tool of economic redistribution. Taking on more and more debt, the business sector cycles cash to Wall Street and the top 10% of households which hold most of the corporate equities.

Needless to say, this on-going plunder of business balance sheets goes hand-in-hand with the collapse of “breadwinner” jobs in the American economy. Once again, the July jobs report’s headlines touted another month of robust job creation. But as has been the case for the past 14 years, this headline job growth has been overwhelmingly concentrated in marginal part time jobs catering to the spending habits of the affluent upper strata. By contrast, owing to the lack of real investment in productive enterprise, the count of breadwinner jobs still remains 5% below its level when Bill Clinton was still in the oval office.

Part Time Economy - Click to enlarge

Part Time Economy – Click to enlarge


Breadwinner Economy - Click to enlarge

Breadwinner Economy – Click to enlarge

At the end of the day, there is no mystery as to why trend GDP growth has fallen to just 1.8% per annum since the year 2000 - a rate which is barely half its trend during the previous half-century. Monetary central planning inherently deforms market capitalism by flooding the business sector with cheap debt, thereby turning it into an engine for the redistribution of existing wealth rather than the generation of new growth, jobs and enterprise.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
maskone909's picture

we simply can not have an economy that produces and consumes simultaneously.  the last 30 years we have gutted our manufacturing- turning our country into a nation of consumers; having to import everything we need.  if we can turn the ship around, there is a glimmer of hope.  unfortunately, FX trade/central banking seems to exacorbate the problem. 

fzrkid's picture

We dont actually NEED most of the things consumed and imported, we could survive easily on the food and water available here in the USA..


LawsofPhysics's picture

Interesting.  I say we shut down all subsidies, in particular, all those SNAP cards and test your hypothesis.


Good luck with that.

fzrkid's picture

Come visit central Maine, you will see many that work just enough to ensure they continue to receive maximum SNAP amounts.


I am all for helping the family down on their luck but trying to work their arses off to make it. I think social programs should be handled at the local level where friends, family and neighbors get together at their town offices and put together opportunities for these in need.


I think you would find out really quickly how many really need the help.


I can promise you I would not volunteer 1 penny for SNAP when the lazy fahkers always have enough money to buy beer and cigarettes. Sure you want food, come visit me and you can help me maintain my garden..

buzzsaw99's picture

a good number of usa corporations are fundamentally worthless

nidaar's picture

Like government, which also speaks to how and why corporations became first 'like' government, then after 2008 part of it.

Atlas Crapped's picture

Not only is all reported growth financialization in the back rooms, but on the profit margin line as well. What the US produces is secondary - it's the profit from F & I that is the real prize. Like with GM. The cars are designed to blow up before year 4, but the loan is still an asset. GMAC is the growth engine. GM is the bailout queen.

SheepDog-One's picture

This all reminds me of the show Workaholics, bunch of people in some corporate office with apparently no purpose or job at all except to play practical jokes on each other all day.

dctim's picture

I have a lot of respect for David but the TEV analysis is off.  TEV does not increase directly because of debt, because each dollar of debt raised is a dollar of cash accumulated so the net debt increase is zero.  Moreover, a dollar of cash spent for buybacks is a dollar of market cap retired so debt fueled buybacks per se don't increase TEV.  The primary reason for increase in TEV is the increase in stock prices driven by earnings growth and multiple expansion, both of which are of course goosed up by low interest rates. As long as index-hugging dumb asset gatherers buy stocks on the back of low interest rates, stocks will remain decoupled from fundamentals.  The day of reckoning will come when there is no more room for cost cutting, when there is cost-push inflation from imports, and when borrowing costs inevitably rise.  Couple this with the inevitable mean reversion of Shiller P/E to long term averages, and you have a serious correction in the markets.  But until then, party on!


Bumbu Sauce's picture

The company I currently labor for went >$2B in debt to establish a strong position to move forward.


It's just insanity

Sandmann's picture

It is a Liquidation Strategy