This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
ISIS And The Coming Escalation In Iraq
Submitted by Pater Tenebrarum of Acting-Man blog,
Kurdistan Has a New Neighbor – The Islamic State
A mere two and a half weeks ago, Falah Mustafa Bakir, the head of foreign relations for the KRG (Kurdish Regional Government), gave an interview to Vice News that contained several quite stunning statements (see below for details). At the time (i.e., in late July), the Kurdish Peshmerga had just taken over areas of Iraq that have been contested for a long time. Specifically, the Kurds regarded these areas – most important among them the oil-rich city of Kirkuk – as their territory.
There was an agreement that the status of Kirkuk would eventually be put to a vote, but Iraq's central government kept delaying the promised referendum, probably because it suspected that the likely outcome would be a vote in favor of Kirkuk joining the autonomous Kurdish region. This would presumably have deprived Baghdad of a sizable chunk of oil revenue. So when ISIS conquered Mosul, the Kurdish Peshmerga took the opportunity to take over Kirkuk. The Iraqi army had already fled from the disputed region, so all the Peshmerga had to do was waltz in and move into the now deserted former Iraqi military bases (similar to ISIS, they also ended up with a nice chunk of Iraqi army equipment).
In late July, an uneasy truce obtained between the Kurds and ISIS. The general view on the ground was that ISIS could simply not afford to fight too many enemies at once. Moreover, rumor had it that ISIS and the KRG had worked out a sub rosa agreement to respect their respective areas of control and not tread on each other.
The interview with Bakir begins at approx. 0:50 in the video below. Several of his statements, as well as his demeanor and tone of voice strongly suggest that some kind of deal with ISIS did indeed exist at the time. Among other things, Bakir mentioned that the Iraqi army was lacking in morale, in spite of being extremely well equipped and in theory well trained, and that its dishonorable flight meant the Peshmerga had no reason to ever leave Kirkuk again. After all, so Bakir, if Baghdad really cared about Kirkuk, its army wouldn't have turned tail and run away. Among his most stunning statements were however the following:
“The reality on the ground in Iraq has changed…today's Iraq is different from last week's Iraq.
[…]
“The political landscape in Iraq has changed…the balance of power has changed…and now we are a neighbor to another emerging state in Iraq: The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. Today, Iraq is not our neighbor – ISIS is our neighbor.”
(emphasis added)
That sure didn't sound like Mr. Bakir expected ISIS to go away anytime soon. He probably still doesn't.
Part of a series of reports by Vice News on Iraq from late July, including an interview with Kurdish foreign relations chief Falah Mustafa Bakir (between 0:50 to 3:40).
However, in the meantime the situation has once again changed. ISIS is in fact fighting the Kurds now, and the vaunted Peshmerga were actually on the run until US airstrikes slowed ISIS down. Actually, they have so far failed to really slow it down much.
A fairly recent map of the territory controlled and/or contested by ISIS via the Economist. Since this map was drawn, a few days have passed, and the Northeastern border has undergone a few additional shifts (see below for details) – click to enlarge.
The Islamic State Keeps Growing In Spite of Air Strikes
The initial reaction of ISIS to the news of US involvement was actually glee. Since the KRG and Baghdad also welcomed the US intervention, we may assume that almost everybody in Iraq is happy now. As Jason Ditz reports:
“ISIS fighters took to Twitter with glee over the weekend to celebrate the Obama Administration’s decision to join the war against them in Iraq, seeing it as both a big morale booster and a potentially huge recruitment tool.
“The crisis will become a gift,” noted one, saying that the US was ISIS biggest enemy, and that US involvement would quicken their takeover of the Persian Gulf. Many of the Twitter posts expressed eagerness to target US warplanes now involved in the war, as well as hopes to attack other US allies across the region.
New English-language ISIS videos are emerging urging Westerners to join ISIS as soon as possible. Some of those in the videos identify themselves as Americans and Britons. ISIS already had a bumper crop of Westerners join the war in Syria over the past couple of years, with large numbers of fighters coming from EU member nations. The early signs are that the US involvement will only help bolster those numbers further.
[…]
ISIS leaders seem to understand much better than the Obama Administration that the US involvement in the war is a game-changer on the ground, and not the good kind like you’d want.”
(emphasis added)
With support from US air strikes, Kurdish Peshmerga forces managed to dislodge ISIS from several villages it had captured in the course of its recent march on Erbil, but even while that happened, the militants took several other towns in Diyala province, and arguably more important ones. The IS-held territory has increased further as a result.
ISIS is now approaching the border between Iraq and Iran, which is almost certain to be regarded as an alarming development by Iran's government. As we noted already back when the group first came to everybody's attention, a free-for-all in Iraq remains a good possibility (reportedly, Iranian military advisors are already in Iraq, in parallel with American ones).
For the details we once again consult a summary by Jason Ditz that links to a number of further information sources. Note that at the time of writing, the situation described below is already a day or so in the past, so there is a good chance that the realities on the ground will have shifted again by the time you read this. The main point is that ISIS' conquest continues to have a great deal of momentum. Moreover, the report contains information that indirectly confirms that the fighting force ISIS is able to muster must be quite large by now:
“With US warplanes supporting them, the Kurdish Peshmerga has pushed back against ISIS in the area just southwest of Irbil, taking the villages of Gwer and Makhmour back, along the border between Kurdistan and the Nineveh Province.
The US airstrikes seem primarily focused in this area, trying to blunt the ISIS offensive as it nears the Kurdish capital at Irbil. Yet this isn’t the only site of combat between ISIS and the Peshmerga.
Indeed, the two villages ISIS lost were dramatically overwhelmed by the ISIS gain in the Diyala Province, where they routed the Peshmerga and seized the strategically important town of Jalawla.
Jalawla had been the site of an ISIS suicide bombing earlier in the day, which killed 10 Peshmerga fighters and wounded 80 others . By the end of the day, the Peshmerga was in retreat, fleeing northward, closer to their home territory.
The town is an important stop on the road between Baghdad and Iran, and just 20 miles from the Iranian border is the farthest east ISIS has yet advanced. It also gives them strategic control over yet another northern highway, limiting the flow of forces between Kurdistan and the remaining territory of the Iraqi central government.
Jalawla is one of the southernmost Kurdish towns in Iraq, and was a site of major bombings against the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in June. Its loss will be a morale blow to the Peshmerga, as well as a likely eye-opener for Iran, as ISIS draws ever nearer their border.
The US air war at present seems focused on the Kurdish-ISIS battles, though ISIS seems to be hitting targets all over their frontier, trying to force the Peshmerga into spreading themselves thin, and is having continued success in taking meaningful territory, despite the loss of Gwer and Makhmour earlier today.”
(emphasis added)
What we find most remarkable in this report is that it once again confirms that ISIS is able to concurrently strike numerous targets spread over a large area. Not to forget, the group continues to fight the Syrian army as well and is lately even engaging the Lebanese army. Most of the equipment it has captured in Iraq was reportedly moved to the Syrian theater, but presumably some of that will find its way back into Iraq now.
It is by now a near certainty that US involvement in the new Iraq war is set to expand considerably. President Obama has gone – within just three days – from “protecting the Yazidi and Erbil” to “protecting Baghdad” and now to “stopping the formation of an Islamic State on the territory of Iraq and Syria”. The “limited engagement” can no longer be expected to last a mere few weeks, but will be of indeterminate duration. Congress is split between those who want war, those who want even more war, and those who want all-out war. The media are of course gung-ho as well (no surprise there). President Obama took pains to point out that it was actually not he, but president Bush who signed the withdrawal agreement with Iraq's government. He also expressed regret that the US engaged only in limited aerial bombardment in Libya, instead of providing support to the new government (by means of boots on the ground, one presumes).
As a practical matter, it should be pointed out that aerial attacks already require a limited presence of ground troops, so as to properly guide the strikes. Moreover, since US military advisors are already in Iraq, it will only be a small step to full-scale escalation, especially in light of the fact that it seems nigh impossible to achieve all the lofty goals enumerated by the president solely by air strikes.
Meanwhile, in Baghdad
The attempt to unseat the “not inclusive enough” Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki, who is widely (and rightly) blamed for alienating Iraq's Sunni minority, is running into unexpected problems:
“Further destabilization rocked Iraq on Sunday as Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki accused President Fouad Massoum of engaging in a "coup" by failing to choose a new prime minister by an Sunday's deadline.
In a last-minute bid to cling to power, Mr. al-Maliki declared the inaction to be "a clear constitutional violation" and said he planned to file a legal complaint against Mr. Massoum, who was named the new president in late July.
“This attitude represents a coup on the constitution and the political process in a country that is governed by a democratic and federal system,” Mr. al-Maliki said in a surprise address on Iraqi TV. “The deliberate violation of the constitution by the president will have grave consequences on the unity, the sovereignty, and the independence of Iraq and the entry of the political process into a dark tunnel," he said.
Mr. al-Maliki's party won the largest share of seats in the parliament and said the president should have appointed a prime minister from that bloc by now. A parliamentary session to discuss picking a new prime minister has been delayed until Aug. 19.
In the hours following Mr. al-Maliki's accusation, Brett McGurk, the State Department's deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, announced via Twitter that the U.S. would continue to support Mr. Massoum. "Fully support President of Iraq Fuad Masum as guarantor of the Constitution and a PM nominee who can build a national consensus," he tweeted.”
(emphasis added)
Al-Maliki is having none of it. In order to underscore who's who in the zoo in Baghdad, he ordered his most loyal troops to deploy in the city, blocking bridges and surrounding the government district (i.e., the so-called “Green Zone”):
“Iraqi troops, security forces and tanks surged into Baghdad on Sunday as political turmoil deepened over who should lead the country. Military tanks were deployed to several neighborhoods in central Baghdad, two Iraqi police officials told CNN. The officials said there are also significantly more troops in Baghdad's Green Zone, the secure area where many government buildings, the military headquarters and the U.S. Embassy are located.
The stepped-up troop presence comes as Iraqi forces battled Islamist militants in northern Iraq, and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki accused Iraq's newly elected President of violating the country's constitution by extending the deadline for Iraq's biggest political coalitions to nominate a candidate for prime minister.
The precise reason for the growing number of troops in the Iraqi capital was unclear. But CNN military analyst retired Lt. Col. Rick Francona described it as an "ominous" development.
"You've got Nuri al-Maliki refusing to step down. Now he's mobilized not just security troops loyal to him, but now he's mobilized army units to put tanks in the streets. Some of the bridges have been closed," Francona said. "It looks like he's trying to lock down the city in some sort of confrontation with the President, so this does not portend well.”
(emphasis added)
In other words, the reason for the growing number of troops occupying Baghdad is actually crystal-clear. Al-Maliki evidently realizes that political power depends on who's got whom outgunned, especially in today's Iraq. After failing to consummate any of the power-sharing deals he promised to engage in before he was elected, al-Maliki incidentally retained not only the office of prime minister, but also that of interior minister and minister of defense. In other words, he formally controls the police and the army – and apparently he controls them de facto as well. As the expert interviewed in the above excerpted article drily notes at one point:
“U.S. officials who put their faith in al-Maliki for years may have misjudged him, Francona said.”
This was hardly the US government's first error of judgment in Iraq and is highly likely not to have been the last.
Iraq's new president Fouad Massoum was elected by parliament with a large majority. An unwritten agreement regarding the division of power in Iraq stipulates that the president must be a Kurd, the prime minister a Shi'ite and the president of parliament a Sunni. This tradition continues to be respected – it is only al-Maliki personally who is increasingly seen as a divisive figure. Massoum is an “old hand” in Iraqi politics and his decision to postpone the nomination of the prime minister is a strong sign that an attempt to unseat al-Maliki is underway.
(Photo credit: Reuters)
Things are happening at grat speed in Iraq these days. While we were writing the above, it transpired that Maliki has been officially forced out as prime minister of Iraq – but refuses to accept the decision.
“Iraq's president named a new prime minister to end Nuri al-Maliki's eight year rule on Monday, but the veteran leader refused to go after deploying militias and special forces on the streets, creating a dangerous political showdown in Baghdad. Washington, which helped install Maliki following its 2003 invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein, congratulated Haidar al-Abadi, a former Maliki lieutenant who was named by President Fouad Masoum to replace him.
But Maliki's Dawa Party declared his replacement illegal, and Maliki's son-in-law said he would overturn it in court. Washington delivered a stern warning to Maliki not to "stir the waters" by using force to cling to power.
(emphasis added)
Presumably the outcome will depend on whether Maliki can keep control of the armed forces.
Conclusion – An Intractable Situation
ISIS has attracted an entire generation of radicalized Sunni militants to the region. If one watches interviews with their enemies such as e.g. Peshmerga fighters, one topic that is occasionally mentioned is that they don't seem to fear death much. Combined with their well-known brutality, this unfoubteldy makes them a formidable fighting force. However, there is evidently far more to ISIS than that.
In this context, we recommend watching the Vice News report on ISIS filmed in Raqqa, the current capital of the “caliphate”. One impression one comes away with is that ISIS is quite careful not to alienate the population too much, in spite of strictly enforcing the sharia. Along similar lines, since ISIS is running Mosul, a number of Sunnis that have initially fled have returned to the city – which for the first time in an eternity has electricity around the clock. ISIS is a bit like Hitler in that way: it is so to speak making the trains run on time, while mercilessly killing large numbers of its perceived enemies and assorted “apostates” at the same time. The group also runs what appears to be a highly effective propaganda campaign – not only via electronic media, but also on the ground in the areas it conquers (its recruitment drive in Iraq is flourishing).
The Islamic State even has something like a national anthem by now, a jihadist anasheed (a piece of Islamic a capella music with very light or no instrumentation) – “Ummaty Qad Laha Farujn” (My Ummah, Dawn Has Appeared) – which actually sounds quite interesting (never mind the martial lyrics). In fact, the music is probably the only good thing to come from ISIS so far:
The ISIS “anthem” Ummaty Qad Laha Farujn – an interesting sounding a capella piece in the anasheed style
All of the above suggests that it will be exceedingly difficult to effectively destroy ISIS. One method of countering it would in theory be the strategy that has already been successfully employed in almost defeating its predecessor organization AQI (“Al Qaeda in Iraq”). This mainly involved alienating AQI from its local support base. A guerrilla force cannot persist unless it has the support of the local population. However, it seems uncertain whether the same strategy can be used with success again. For one thing, Maliki's suppression of the Sunnis has made ISIS the lesser evil in the eyes of many locals. For another thing, the organization has evolved a great deal and is highly unlikely to repeat AQI's mistakes.
It seems to us that if the goals the president has announced in recent days are to be achieved, nothing short of a full-scale invasion of Iraq (as well as of Syria for good measure) is likely to suffice – and even then, success is by no means guaranteed. Another possibility – a remote one at this stage, but it cannot be ruled out just yet – is that the regional forces arrayed against ISIS actually get their act together for a change.
A map of the Ummayad Caliphate, which lasted from AD 661 to AD 750. In terms of territory, this was the largest of the three early Islamic caliphates. It was also far more tolerant than the retro-Islam preached by ISIS – click to enlarge.
»
- 29507 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
we're all fucked
Today in the Washington Post, Dana Milbank reams Nero (Obola) for fiddling (golfing) while Rome (the World) burns:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-obama-vacations-as-t...
I suspect that this is related to reports coming from St Louis today that no work boots were stolen from the various shoe stores that were looted during the rioting.
That last map with the Ummayad Caliphate all in green......I don't see any blue on there for Israel....good luck with that!
Do to these bastards what they used to do in the old days before Europe became wimpy: just before you kill them cover them in pork fat. Allah after all doesn't like pigs so no heaven with 72 virgins for them.
You only do such things if you are serious about winning.
Two oceans.
Means the US doesn't give half a damn about ISIS or their new Califate. Europe probably cares, but Europe is already cooked. The Turks can have them back.
In the US we only care about the oil, which we care about a lot. ISIS probably plans on destroying the oil fields to punish the West and establish leverage. I think that will probably result in a nuclear weapon being dropped on them. Not even joking, it will come out of nowhere, everyone will blame either Israel or Iran or both. The US oligarchs will never allow the Iraqi oil fields to fail to produce. They won't allow ISIS into Iran either, or into Saudi Arabia.
This is looking like a very serious "game of thrones". If anyone at the Pentagon gets the idea we are in the claws of an oil end-game, they'll just unwind this shit-storm very fast and let Allah pick of the pieces.
Well, it does look like radar and satellite evidence might be hard to come by...
Voted 1/5 on this article because the author left out the fact that Sunni, Shi'a, and Baha'i scholars consider the Umayyads to be apostates, and thus not 'true' Muslims.
Ah yes, gotta go back to Iraq to re-establish a new set of death squads to rule the territory.
But to justify it, we need “sectarian violence” and “ethnic hatred”.
To create sectarian violence, US/UK/Judeo-Bolshevik forces established Sunni death squads to eliminate Shiite dissidents; they established Shiite death squads to murder Sunni dissidents; they established Kurdish death squads to kill Arab dissidents… and they called it “sectarian violence” or “ethnic hatred”.
However, one observer remarked, “When a US-backed, US-financed ‘Shia’ organization murders a Sunni, it isn’t Shia killing Sunni; it isn’t sectarian violence, it is the US killing Sunni. When a US-backed, US-trained ‘Sunni’ militia murders a Shia, it isn’t Sunni killing Shia; it isn’t sectarian violence, it is the US killing Shia.”
So, why are they doing this? It’s actually a training exercise for what they have planned for the American populace; you know, seizing guns, imposing martial law et cetera. Only here, death squads will be managed by the DHS, which by the way, is a refined re-incarnation of French Committees of Terror (1792-4), the Judeo-Bolshevik Cheka, and the Nazi Schutzstaffel (SS). You’ll find sources for all in my article, Building an American Schutzstaffel.
(Follow my other comments: click my name, thanks.)
Did you forget to mention the Gestapo? That would be the FBI.
Just didn' get around to it.
You don't also go by the moniker of George Washington, do you? The message is the same.
As far as I know, there's no relationship; except, possibly, the message, as you indicate.
Didn't Israel go ahead and develop the neutron bomb when the U.S. had to abandon its plans in the 1970s?
Could have Israel pop off a few of 'em, over Iran, Iraq, Gaza (check the wind direction first), Syria - and POOF!
Problem solved.
Then just move in and take the oil fields. Could throttle Russia and boost the U.S. economy in one stroke - flood the market with oil, drive the price down to $18/barrel for a few years.
You guys just need to get in touch with your inner Rumsfeld.
I think that's the general plan but so far the execution has been carried out by a bunch of fuckin retards.
ask JFK he tried to stop them, oh wait...
To resurrect the Umayyad map is a way of saying that this current regression will push Arabian states to reuniting like they did then.
IMO that is something that will never occur in its pristine form under the muslim flag. Too much water under the bridge of time and too much Fitna--inter muslim violence based on sectarian ideology-- for the so called "Umma" to re-unite; that dream is dead.
The muslim nation states have to move on to secular political constructs.
Nearly 800 years after the House of Wisdom was destroyed in Baghdad by the Mongols its time for the muslims to follow in the footsteps of the Christians and to find the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.
Only then in the blood of dying dogmatic, obscurantist ideologies; like during the religious wars of the West; will they find resolution to their existential conundrum by entering into the modern age. Not as surrogate valets of the west but as active partners in a new age that will inevitably rise from the demise of petrodollar hegemony now gone virally decadent.
We have a long way to go. And the West may regress but for the East to progress, it will take even more blood and guts than WW1 and WW2 combined by the looks of it.
"to find the Renaissance and the Enlightenment."
All sensible points.
Islam will find it's way, but only in isolation from the West. The capital and crony diseases of the West will destroy any rise of Islam. Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Ag. They simply will not allow anything to rise from the muck and mire except that they brand it first, brain-wash the masses there, and over-bear all thought and action creating "consumers" of their ideal, which ideal being mindless consumption itself.
Even the Western "Enlightenment" would not have happened had it not happened 300 years ago. Today it would be laughable to contemplate such a thing.
I fear that Islam may be forever infected. The sectarian violence might have been born of their own history, but the weapons, money, influence-peddling and corruption are 1000x enabled due to contact with the West. So like the West, Islam is probably doomed.
I don't know what comes after. I can see many things, but I cannot see that far. A fair guess is that what comes after might be a pastiche of The West and Islam, with maybe some Far Eastern influences, lovingly assembled by spiritually-mind folk trying to make sense of what came before but was lost to history and legend.
"forever" : you have no idea how the pendulum swings from dominant Oligarchy, aka Optimates rule, to dominant Populares and then on to Despotism etc. etc.
I don't know if human history is about constant, painful progress or just going round the circle again and again.
By nature I tend to believe in the first thesis but stay prudent, as the other is such a recurrent disease.
Great post! A simpler dynamic: The world falls apart sufficiently that people are more worried about survival than killing their "enemy". Then things begin to improve.
What you have today in the Middle East is a situation much like what Cleisthenes found in Athens in around 515 BC. His reforms didn't take place until 508 BC. He broke up the traditional tribes and re-jigged their politics to create the Athenian democratic concept that took hold.
Going forward, I expect we will find a Kurdish Cleisthenes to be the leader to clean up this Sunni-Shiite mess.
Is Israel scared yet? They are scared of little boys with rocks. If Israel isn't scared, neither am I.
absolutely ridiculous-- 'IS', this article... total hearsay and bullshit...
as a ?`cassadra'? sir, you fail miserably!
jmo
what's with vice news as this new 'authority' they are propogandists plane and ismple.
the bullshit north korea 'visit'. are you kidding me?
vice = governmetn program.
you see the refugee is needsd in europe
it a kosher project
the jewishers
they need it multi culture ism they need it bad.
i dontes nose whys but ho um they need it.
no points in askin why it so vital like askin a crackhead why crack
yes sir rebob it a project world wide gay and transgender fundin
this lady can speak better she from anudder planet but even eye can understand.
Barbara Lerner Spectre and jewish implementation of multiracial multiculturalism in the Europehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Vq_e2Z1ug
hey francis sawyer, go back to your hole.
It would be interesting if Iraq (backed by the US) falls to ISIS, but Syria (backed by Russia) is able to fend off ISIS....
The early Caliphates spread war and misery throughout the Levant and Persia, across the Maghreb and into Spain, Portugal and France. To frame that conduct as relatively “tolerant” is far too generous and anachronistic.
In AD 750 the Umayyad line was replaced by the Abbasid Caliphate. The Abbasids charged the Umayyads with impiety on a large scale.
After 750 biographical material about Mohammed finally began to appear. The first complete biography of the prophet of Islam was written at least 125 years after the traditional date of his death.
Similarly after 750 the main features of the Islamic sharia law were definitively established and sharia became the law of behavior for Muslims.
The Ummayyads did not have the dictates of supremacist sharia to inflict on conquered peoples who could and did remain practicing Zorastrians, Christians or Jews. Hey Infidels, that changed after the sharia.
"To frame that conduct as relatively “tolerant” is far too generous and anachronistic."
When they first conquered those territories the number of muslim soldiers was very few so the rulers were tolerant to prevent rebellions. As the percentage of muslims increased over time they got less tolerant.
I like the melody :)
given a few transports of proper military hardware,munitions and other equipment, I rather think these Kurdish bloaks could solve their problem with this Isis group quite nicely. I have been determined to keep repeating that Iraq should be carved into 3 provinces or states under a voluntary compac to form the Repuplic of Iraq. Get into the game or be eaten
given a few transports of proper military hardware,munitions and other equipment, I rather think these Kurdish bloaks could solve their problem with this Isis group quite nicely. I have been determined to keep repeating that Iraq should be carved into 3 provinces or states under a voluntary compac to form the Republic of Iraq. Get into the game or be eaten
The US getting involved again is a strategic error. We tried in Iraq, and we failed. Why is it so important that we defend the arbitrary borders drawn up by Britian and France a hundred years ago? Let the Sunnis, Kurds and Shia fight it out and the borders will redraw themselves, probably along more peaceful and stable borders.
Then we offer trade, arms, w/e - the carrots and sticks to the new states.
Problem solved.
Just be patient, Ebola will come to the rescue.
America could not have messed up the area more even if it had tried. Things have deteriorated to the point that Americans are using every opportunity to take their eyes off what is happening in Iraq, the country has become a train wreck and is rapidly morphing into a failed State.
It is often unwise to take your eyes off a problem for long because when you look back you might find that things have gone horribly wrong, this is the case in Iraq and Syria. The group called ISIS shocked much of the world by swiftly capturing Mosul in an offensive that allowed the group to take control of major parts of northern and western Iraq. On June 29, 2014 the Islamist militants declared an Islamic "caliphate" in an area straddling Iraq and Syria. More on this subject in the article below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2014/08/islamic-state-of-iraq-and-levant....
They are coming to eat your babies!
VICE News has released Videos 3 and 4 of their embed with IS.
https://news.vice.com/video/the-islamic-state-part-3