This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Total Mispricing of Risk Courtesy of the Fed
The Fed has bet the financial system on academic theories, that upon close inspection defy even basic common sense.
One could easily write a multi-volume set of books on the Fed’s mistakes. However, in its simplest rending, the biggest flaw in the Fed’s models pertains to its total lack of understanding of human behavior.
The Fed believes that if interest rates are low, investors will seek out higher returns by piling into stocks or even real estate. As these asset prices rose, the investors would feel wealthier and so go out and spend more money… which in turn would drive the economy towards growth (70% of US GDP stems from consumer spending).
Of course, the Fed’s model is far more complicated than this, involving all kinds of clever math equations… but ultimately the Fed’s recipe for growth is “cut rates and if necessary, buy bonds with newly printed money and growth will appear.”
The only problem with this all of this is that people buy things with income not based on where their stock portfolio is trading (assuming that have a portfolio, but that’s a issue for another time).
When you go to buy groceries or a new suit, you don’t stop to think where stocks are trading. You think about how much money is in your bank account based on your salary… or you use a credit card and project that you’ll have the money to pay off your debt down the road.
After all, the money you “make” from higher asset prices isn’t actually real money unless you sell the asset. You cannot go into a store and offer to pay your bill with part of your stock portfolio. And most investors have the bulk of their portfolio money in 401(k)s, IRAs, and other investment vehicles which they cannot easily convert into cash without facing a penalty.
Who on earth thinks “I will buy this item today because stocks are up and several years from now (possibly decades) I will sell my stocks and have a lot of money”??? No one but Fed officials apparently.
So while the Fed’s policies haven’t generated any significant growth, one thing they have accomplished is a total mispricing of risk in the financial system. Again, the reason for this has to do with the Fed’s complete and total lack of understanding of basic human nature.
When the Fed began announcing QE programs, the single most obvious trade in the whole world became “front-running the Fed.”
In this trade, traders would buy Treasuries at Treasury auctions only to then turn around and sell the bonds to the Fed a few days (or maybe a week or two) to the Fed. After all, if you know that someone else is going to be buying bonds at a certain date and time in the future… and you know they’re not going to be too picky about the price they pay…why not try to game this system to eek out a profit?
By piling into bonds, traders forced prices higher and yields lower: precisely what the Fed wanted. These folks were looking for profits while the Fed was looking for lower yields (meaning higher bond prices). It’s a match made in heaven.
So how screwed up is the risk profile in the world? Today, the yield on the 10-year Treasury (the benchpark for riskless money according to modern financial theory) is yielding 2.4%.
If you were to go all the way back to 1790, the yield on the 10-Year Treasury (or its equivalent at the time) has been lower than it currently is only one time before the Fed started its QE programs, and that was in 1945 at the end of WWII.
Treasuries actually yielded MORE than they are now in the depth of the 2008 collapse when everyone thought the world was ending.
This absurd valuation exists throughout the globe. In Europe, the yields on sovereign bonds for bankrupt nations are at multi-century lows.
These bonds are the benchmarks for “risk” in the financial system. Stocks, corporate bonds, mortgages, auto loans, emerging market stocks… everything you can name are ultimately priced based on their perceived risk relative to the “risk free” rate of lending money to the US for 10 years.
This is the basic philosophy underlying all modern financial analysis. It is applied by everyone from mutual fund managers to C-level executives looking to decide on whether to fund an expansion or not. And as noted before, these yields are total skewed away from reality based on the Fed’s and other Central Banks’ policies.
The specifics of how this mess will sort itself out are unknown. But in a general sense, anytime assets become mispriced to these extremes it ends badly.
This concludes this article. If you’re looking for the means of protecting your portfolio from the coming collapse, you can pick up a FREE investment report titled Protect Your Portfolio at http://phoenixcapitalmarketing.com/special-reports.html.
This report outlines a number of strategies you can implement to prepare yourself and your loved ones from the coming market carnage.
Best Regards
Phoenix Capital Research
- advertisements -
QUOTE:These bonds are the benchmarks for “risk” in the financial system. Stocks, corporate bonds, mortgages, auto loans, emerging market stocks… everything you can name are ultimately priced based on their perceived risk relative to the “risk free” rate of lending money to the US for 10 years UNQUOTE
1) These bonds are the benchmarks for risk in the Indebted Leveraged US/EC financial systems not the global financial system where there are Creditor Nations and Bond Vigilantes. They have positions and alternatives to profit from your implosion and their influence over global fund flows and the price of the $ is much larger today than yesteryears when US was the dominant econ superpower.
2) Using first grade calculation, the present value of all other assets in $ term is determined by the "risk free" rate. This risk free rate is anchored on free market price discovery not on an artificial price engendered by money printing. There is no link now and further exacerbated by various rigged market segments where these "other assets" reside.
What is and will be going on will be street fights in various markets segments and you bury spins on causations and deluded market guidances.
"Everything you can name is ultimately priced based on their perceived risk relative to the “risk free” rate of lending money to the US for 10 years."
Well hold on because I'm not interested! This is all based on the dollar having real value at the end of this period.
Both people and governments have lived beyond their means by taking on debt they cannot repay. Over the last several decades we have created entitlement societies built on the back of the industrial revolution, technological advantages, capital accumulated from the colonial era, and the domination of global finances. Promises were made on the assumption that the advantages we enjoyed would continue.
Ever greater prosperity and entitlements were to be sustained through debt financed consumption growth. In that eerie fantasy world, debt fueled consumption was to be the catalyst to bring about evermore growth. Now reality has begun to come into focus and it is becoming apparent that this is unsustainable. The entitlements and promises that have piled up have become overwhelming. More on why this system will fail in the article below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2014/08/modern-monetary-theory-is-wrong-d...
This mispricing of risk could lead to a collapse of the credit market. It might soon become apparent the economic efficiency of credit is beginning to collapse and the additional money poured into the system coupled with lower rates can no longer drive the economy forward. When this happens we are at the end game.
At some point the return on loaning money is simply not worth the risk! Why do you want to loan money if most likely you will never be repaid or repaid with something that is totally worthless? When this happens the only safe place to store wealth will be in "tangible assets" and the only lenders will be those who print the money that nobody wants.
The collapse of credit can pose major problems such as what we saw when many sellers were forced to demand payment up front before shipping goods in 2008. More on this subject below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-economic-efficiency-of-credit...