Isn't it odd that "the other party" did everything possible to expedite this betrayal? Boehner? Roberts?
I don't believe this is a "cycle". Its an enemy operation. As is the propaganda selling it as an inevitable trend against which resistance is futile, coincidentally buy the same people who bought congress. Both "parties".
That's right, they don't understand you and you don't understand them, but you said you understood their anger. If you understood them you would know it's not about the state, it's about perceived injustice from the man, the man being you, not the gov. The gov divides people and want's looting because it makes the population want even more police protection, even from the blacks.
Whenever there is a public disturbance or even a natural calamity, the looters always show up to take advantage.
Our state overlords are happy to have the looters show up because it provides a convenient distraction from the main event, public outrage at police violence.
The statement was made in another post yesterday that the police are here to protect the state from the people, not to protect the people. There is a great deal of truth to that statement.
Assuming your black thug deserves what you think he deserves, do you think all of those people are upset over your "black thug" event or are they upset about something bigger?
How about the pattern of law enforcement behavior apparently prevalent in the neighborhoods around St Louis and the lack of state interest in examining public grievances.
Oh, OK. Because I don't think this rioting is about general public grievances but is specifically about grievences from the black community. At least that's the way the civil rights leaders and MSM are branding this.
I am not there and I suspect neither are you. I don't pay attention to what Al Sharpton says. I look at the pictures and footage and I see a fair number of white people protesting along with the blacks. All the more significant given that these neighborhoods are predominantly black.
And no, I don't think that the militarized police phenomena is an NAACP propaganda construction. The NAACP certainly did not give a flying fuck about the police treatment of OWS.
OWS turned out to be an embarassment to the progressive movement, the MSM was pushing for then at first, Bloomberg even invited them into NYC, but it didn't take long before no one wanted any association with them.
funny, you talk like a "patriot" but totally ignore the constitution:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.[1]"
come on WB, get with the program. all blacks are genetically crazy dangerous animals. white people need the police to militarize with tanks, armed drones and machine guns in order to protect us from the rampaging hoardes... the police would never later turn on all of us to protect the (banker) state... no way.
just like in gaza... one black person jay walks or talks back to a cop, then the "good guys" shoot up, drone and bomb an entire block. that's how freedom rolls.
WB7, you can always tell when you've hit squarely on the head of the matter, when there is disagreement with you images. The noose is a fine example of hitting the nail right on the head and sinking it home.
Isn't it odd that "the other party" did everything possible to expedite this betrayal? Boehner? Roberts?
I don't believe this is a "cycle". Its an enemy operation. As is the propaganda selling it as an inevitable trend against which resistance is futile, coincidentally buy the same people who bought congress. Both "parties".
Typical prius prick... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpFHf0HwaDc
there is only the Party. republican branch, or democratic branch, in the U.S. anyway.
That's right, they don't understand you and you don't understand them, but you said you understood their anger. If you understood them you would know it's not about the state, it's about perceived injustice from the man, the man being you, not the gov. The gov divides people and want's looting because it makes the population want even more police protection, even from the blacks.
Actually, I dont think that its very complicated. And I do think I understand where they are coming from. Isn't it pretty obvious?
Whenever there is a public disturbance or even a natural calamity, the looters always show up to take advantage.
Our state overlords are happy to have the looters show up because it provides a convenient distraction from the main event, public outrage at police violence.
The statement was made in another post yesterday that the police are here to protect the state from the people, not to protect the people. There is a great deal of truth to that statement.
You're losing me WB7.
Where is your outrage at media reporting inequities ?
A black thug with a DOCUMENTED violent past gets shot attacking a lone cop, and I'm supposed to feel sorry for the thug ?
Where is the "news" about the 1000 other black on white attacks, or black on black attacks ?
Like bankers and Wall St, these welfare thieves are "kleptocrats" too, and deserve to be treated the same way.
If we could eliminate the top and bottom 10% of our society, we'd be solvent beyond imagination.
Assuming your black thug deserves what you think he deserves, do you think all of those people are upset over your "black thug" event or are they upset about something bigger?
Now I'm curious, What something bigger do you think they're upset about?
How about the pattern of law enforcement behavior apparently prevalent in the neighborhoods around St Louis and the lack of state interest in examining public grievances.
Oh, OK. Because I don't think this rioting is about general public grievances but is specifically about grievences from the black community. At least that's the way the civil rights leaders and MSM are branding this.
I am not there and I suspect neither are you. I don't pay attention to what Al Sharpton says. I look at the pictures and footage and I see a fair number of white people protesting along with the blacks. All the more significant given that these neighborhoods are predominantly black.
And no, I don't think that the militarized police phenomena is an NAACP propaganda construction. The NAACP certainly did not give a flying fuck about the police treatment of OWS.
OWS turned out to be an embarassment to the progressive movement, the MSM was pushing for then at first, Bloomberg even invited them into NYC, but it didn't take long before no one wanted any association with them.
OWS was the first shot fired in American Revolution II.
Ferguson is just another (liberal) media hyped "raycis" non event.
Thugs push a cop back into his car and he fights back.
JUST the way I would want it. When they STOP behaving like animals, the cops will stop treating them like animals.
Their behavior after the shooting PROVES the cops point.
funny, you talk like a "patriot" but totally ignore the constitution:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.[1]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Consti...
no where do i see summary execution by roid raging cop in that.
EXACTLY:
"the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial"
If he wants to skip the trial, and handle it himself, he get's shot.
No big loss.
come on WB, get with the program. all blacks are genetically crazy dangerous animals. white people need the police to militarize with tanks, armed drones and machine guns in order to protect us from the rampaging hoardes... the police would never later turn on all of us to protect the (banker) state... no way.
just like in gaza... one black person jay walks or talks back to a cop, then the "good guys" shoot up, drone and bomb an entire block. that's how freedom rolls.
Replace the "all" with OVERWHELMINGLY, and I'd agree with you.
But then, you think you were being sarcastic, don't you ?
Divide and conquer... its how the few rule the many.
What does it say about any political group supporting multiculturalism?
no argument from me on that... often, its the usual suspects heading them up. just look that LGBT "movement"...
Death to counterfeiters and looters.
.."counterfeiters and looters".
Soooo which one is the Fed?- oh both.
WB7, you can always tell when you've hit squarely on the head of the matter, when there is disagreement with you images. The noose is a fine example of hitting the nail right on the head and sinking it home.
DaddyO
a noose isn't ray cist....it's cheap and efficient ;-)