The Real Threat

Tyler Durden's picture

Presented with no comment...



Source: Investors

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
LawsofPhysics's picture

...and Bush=Obama.

fixed it for you.  Please, the greatest threats to America are not "foreign". headlong into the abyss gentlemen...

NYPoke's picture

Bush = Clinton.


Obama is a complete sociopath.  The other two, more or less, played the game, as others had created it.

LawsofPhysics's picture

Bankers/MIC have firmly been in control since 1971.  All presidents since then have gotten increasingly more sociopathic/pshycopathic.  You have one group of oligarchs that only knows how to "create" paper promises and the other only knows how to blow shit up. 

Talk about massive capital and resource mis-allocation and mal-investment...

Roll the mother fucking guillotines while you still can...

Kirk2NCC1701's picture

We can thank Kissinger for talking Nixon into this.  Like he also talked him into "China" and all kinds of other "ideas".

Nixon truly was just another "Useful POTUS", and "Dead men tell no tales".

john39's picture

sith mind control, or just plain satanic evil...

James_Cole's picture

Analysts have underlined the deliberate inflammation of sectarian conflict between Iraqi Shias and Sunnis during the Iraq War by various Sunni and Shiite actors as the root cause of ISIS's rise.

The most common weapons used against US and other Coalition forces during the Iraq insurgency were those taken from Saddam Hussein’s weapon stockpiles around the country, these included AKM variant assault rifles, PK machine guns and RPG-7s. ISIS has been able to strengthen its military capability by capturing large quantities and varieties of weaponry during the Syrian Civil Warand Post-U.S. Iraq insurgency. These weapons seizures have improved the group's capacity to carry out successful subsequent operations and obtain more equipment. Weaponry that ISIS has reportedly captured and employed include SA-7 and Stinger surface-to-air missiles, M79 Osa, HJ-8 and AT-4 Spigot anti-tank weapons, Type 59 field guns and M198 howitzers, Humvees, T-54/55 and T-72 main battle tanks,M1117 armoured cars, Truck mounted DShK guns, ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft guns, BM-21 Grad multiple rocket launchers and at least one Scud missile.

When ISIS captured Mosul Airport in June 2014, it seized a number of UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters and cargo planes that were stationed there. However, according to Peter Beaumont ofThe Guardian, it seemed unlikely that ISIS would be able to deploy them.

Yep, dis all obama fault. Dat dumb lazy keyan socialist bastard / micromanaging evil genius built a time machine and fooled BushCheney into invading iraq!! I noes it! Now, 'scuse me while i look up the antichrist, revolvers and diabetes meds.

nope-1004's picture

Doesn't matter who the leaders are, doesn't matter their gender, race, or party.  They represent an evil power that controls all the strings, intent on creating fear in their nation while destabilizing foreign lands.  The banking cabal is the source of this evil power.  A reserve currency and associated "sanctions" are proof that control and punishment go hand in hand with this group.

Obama, Bush, and Clinton are too stupid to be the true "commander-in-chief".


DOT's picture

"We leave behind a self reliant Iraq" - BHO

Ms. Erable's picture

...not to mention 100 metric shit-tons of cash, a grip of helicopters that will fall from the sky when occupied by Seal team members, a bunch of poorly designed semi-armored vehicles that can locate and detonate any IED within 5 klicks of their position, and way too many overflowing cemetaries and used bodybags.

medium giraffe's picture

Don't forget the recent addition of bomb craters full of aid packages.  wtfubarack!

Leonardo Fibonacci2's picture


Lincoln and Kennedy Coincidences

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846. 
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946. 

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860. 
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960. 

The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters. 

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights. 

Both wives lost their children while living in the White House. 

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday. 

Both were shot in the head. 

Lincoln's secretary, Kennedy, warned him not to go to the theatre. 
Kennedy's secretary, Lincoln, warned him not to go to Dallas. 

Both were assassinated by Southerners. 

Both were succeeded by Southerners. 

Both successors were named Johnson. 

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808. 
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908. 

John Wilkes Booth was born in 1839. 
Lee Harvey Oswald was born in 1939. 

Both assassins were known by their three names. 

Both names are comprised of fifteen letters 

Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse. 
Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater. 

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

FeralSerf's picture

It is highly unlikely, if not impossible, that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy.

Oswald was a patsy, setup by the ones that conspired to kill Kennedy.

old naughty's picture

The shadow fot the short guy is "longer" than the shadow for the tall guy?

And the horizon looks wrong, no?

nope-1004's picture

And.....  you forgot that little tidbit where G Bush Sr. worked in CIA security in Nov 1963 and called off the secret service to be with Kennedy when he landed in Dallas.  Civilian police were on site, along with the CIA and shooters.  NEVER has a President been protected by the CIA.... except JFK was that day.  It has always been the Secret Service.  The Bush family is deep in corruption.  Many other facts will emerge over time.


Drunk In Church's picture

The real threat facing America is off-shoring.  Without a manufacturing base, we're just another mediocre country.  We have a serious employment problem.  Enough said.

boattrash's picture

Leonardo, so what's your point, are you saying it's time for another head shot?

USisCorrupt's picture

Or maybe it should be more like 1,000,000

Dublinmick's picture

There are many things that Tecumseh predicted but the most startling would be the New Madrid earthquake but almost as notable would be the many presidents who would die in office if the indian lands were taken from them.

The great Shawnee chief, Tecumseh, was a warrior, a diplomat, a peacemaker and a prophet. He accurately prophesied to the day the great earthquake at New Madrid, IL (December 18, 1811) several months before it occurred. Tecumseh and his brother organized a confederacy of tribes to fight the menace of the United States. After the Battle of Tippecanoe (1811), in which his brother Tenskwatawa was defeated, Chief Techumseh sent a message, delivered by prisoners he released to  General William H. Harrison:

“Harrison will not win this year to be the great chief. But he may win next year. If he does, he will not finish his term. He will die in office.”

One of the prisoners argued, “But Chief Tecumseh, no president has ever died in office”.

“Harrison will die, I tell you,” Tecumseh said. “And when he dies you will remember the deaths of my people. You think that I have lost my powers: I who caused the sun to darken and red men to give up firewater. But I tell you Harrison will die. And after him, every great chief chosen every twenty years thereafter will die. And when each one dies, let everyone remember the death of our people.”

Before Tecumseh left for the Battle of the Thames in Canada (October 13, 1813), he gave away his possessions and made this prophecy to Tenskwatawa:

  • William Harrison (1841, pneumonia)
  • Abraham Lincoln (1865, assassinated)
  • James Garfield (1881)
  • William McKinley (1901)
  • Warren Harding (1923)
  • Franklin Roosevelt (1945)
  • John F. Kennedy (1963, assassinated)
  • Only two presidents elected at 20-year intervals before 1840 did not die in office: Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe (30, 31)


The 20-year cycle has been analyzed by the Fisher Exact Probability test and yields a statistical significance level of 0.00004, which is to say that there is only a very low possibility that the 20-year cycle is due to chance.

The statistical and theoretical difficulties of analyzing the cycle have been treated by the mathematician Michael Capobianco using a more conservative technique which still yields statistically significant results (0.012). According to Capobianco,

Doubleguns's picture

Bankers/MIC have firmly been in control since 1971. 


I think 1913 is more like it. Long time to get here and it will take a long time to get out of here. 

mvsjcl's picture

What I would pay to read a Presidential "memoir" that wasn't wholesale fiction.

giggler321's picture

Like Rothschild wanted control of money and didn't care for who controls the people; there are those in power, under the chickens head that gets voted in, who always have their job, are in control no matter who gets voted in.  I do not know names but certainly the bankers remain in power pulling strings and importantly so do the military.  Look for the John Dingell of banking or military and you are probably on the right path.

buyingsterling's picture

true, but Obama is truly their BOY. His 'blackness' allows him a new and unprecedented level of darkness.

He's the reason why Americans should never elect another minority, ever, unless they are conservative. The dick-sucking supplicants in the press have spent the last six years with their heads between Obama's legs, bobbing up and down. They'll give the same preferences to any woman or minority, which means we get an unaccountable executive.

shovelhead's picture


What planet you think you're on, boy?

Bush II? Clinton? (outside lying to a grand jury) Bush I? On and on...

Funny guy.

lotsoffun's picture

buyingsterling - sounds good to me!! except one thing.  it's over.

i am an american citizen, my origins are all western europe.  you think we are a 'majority'?

i work, make pretty good money and pay taxes, get NO bennies from  is that a majority?

oh - i don't work for local/state/federal government or corporations depending on government contracts.  majority?

i'm also not anywhere in the 'rainbow' coalition.  majority?

it's over dude.  sorry.  we ARE NOT a majority, and we become less and less so.

almost 50% of the united states is on some sort of hand-out, the number will only be increasing.

good luck, bud.  the whole qe thing and all the other government workings right now (except for pockets of local places that aren't ferguson, or detroit, or phillie, or brooklyn, or south l.a.)  are about taking everything that we have.

once that's gone, they'll deal with it.  but they haven't considered yet what comes after.



Dr. Bonzo's picture

You make a valid point. The Agenda has moved forward without slowdown under Barry, but it's obvious the left's "civil liberties" gang kept crying foul over all of Shrub's Constitutional transgressions. You haven't heard a whimper from them for the last 5 years. Not a fucking word. Guantanamo, targetted assassinations, renditions, Afghanistan, funding islamofascists, NSA, Wallstreet. Not. A. Fucking. Whimper.

We have to assume the next affirmative action candidate will get the same kids gloves treatment and a free pass.


Point well made.

Yohimbo's picture

youll hear nothing but praise for kissinger in the mass and documentary media...what does that tell you?

they worship the ground that grand demon walked on.  My best guess is that he shared a soul with Edward Bernays (may he rot in hell)

SMG's picture

"Roll the mother fucking guillotines while you still can..."

You know I wonder what it will take, or are they going to manage us with fear/bribery through this transition.

Maybe that's why they want WWIII cause after that, they can do whatever they want without question.

Maybe they'll be a second American revolution.

It seems really hopeless lately.


john39's picture

second american civil war seems more likely to be the plan.  not so much regional this time, as class and ethnic...

agent default's picture

War on that scale is a double edged sword.   They don't want all out WWIII the result can be too unpredictable.  What they want s many low intensity conflict preferably coming closer to home creating more uncertainty and the people accepting more government intervention/surveillance/interference at all levels.  For their "safety" of course.

RaceToTheBottom's picture

He needs a second Grenada.

Maybe some clean cut US Med Students....

buyingsterling's picture

Here's my speculative theory of everything political, in a nutshell. It explains all of the varied threats that just seem to keep coming, police militarization etc., but unfortunately assumes that the elite would prefer a population of productive people to a population of dependents. So it likely isn't true.

Something big and beyond the control of the elite is coming, and they know it's coming. Probably something earth-related, as opposed to an economic oollapse. Between now and then, they're going to milk the system for what they can get, but also thin the herd and simultaneously encourage intelligent people to get ready and get hard. Then, when the true shit comes down, there's a smaller, hardier population that might not cannibalize itself entirely in the aftermath.


luckystars's picture

My theory is

They have lost global domination with Cremia going back to Russia.

They bet the farm on this so they are cornered animals now.

Proxy wars going and then the big fireworks, nukes.

Russia survives and takes Istanbul, at this point Russian fleet can go into the Mediterranean and that breaks the back of NATO.

After that Jesus returns and restores the earth, or takes his flock away.

His flock are basically the decent people of any faith.

The rest are judged.

And that is the big thing they know is coming, they are trying to create as much chaos as possible, while they still can.

Destruction is what they crave, they are demonic creatures.


nmewn's picture

My theory is, they never have had a game plan outside of simple graft & corruption through "their laws" and regulations. They're going to be quite shocked when no one pays any attention to the mountains of paper they've produced or them waving it around as if paper actually means something.

Moe Howard's picture

I agree with you. I have thought so for the last couple of years. They are kicking the can because they know a big reset is coming. I don't know what it is, however we have a few "indicators" - more earthquakes, more meteors, more astroids, sun acting weird etc.

Polar shift?


Earth shrugs?

Huge volocanic eruption [say Jellystone blows its wad].


Whatever it is, they know it is coming, and they cannot do anything at all about it.

It explains a lot, including why they seem so unconcerned about radiation from Japan.

Miffed Microbiologist's picture

Well, unless they have a fortified bunker filled with multigenerational provisions/ unlimited energy source or a space vehicle capable of interstellar/ inter-dimensional travel, they seem a little fucked themselves. Part of me thinks they are holding their finger in the dike ( dyke?) and just praying it all works being in a sick state of normalcy bias.


Harbanger's picture

Mr. is fortunate to have you.

Teach or better yet, raise some children woman, the Lord is with you, he will clear the way for you, just do it.

Miffed Microbiologist's picture

He already has and I am very grateful.


udaman's picture

Fuck u. Moe? Worst stooge

JRobby's picture

Fuck yea!

Well put and so economically.

Piked heads are the response.

Piked heads is so medieval you think? What would we call this current serfdom?

shovelhead's picture

Arabs Gone Wild.

Buy the Disc...$29.99.

Freddie's picture

The US Military and Pentagon do nothing to defend the Constitution or the people.  It's been that way since the Civil War.

NeoRandian's picture

Is there anything in the constitution about the military burning down your entire city? I haven't skimmed it in a while.

LawsofPhysics's picture

The money supply became fully "untethered" in 1971.  A central bank isn't necessarily bad, if they can't print all the money they want.  Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.

buyingsterling's picture

Martin Armstrong argues that the Fed was fairly responsible into the sixties, but then government's appetite for money forced them to increase the money supply drematically.

shovelhead's picture

He's right about that.

At numerous times the head of the Fed would fight Presidents who wanted to adopt loose fiscal policies. Johnson shopped them until he finally got his compliant man.

Johnson's Viet Nam and Welfare Great Society caused the printing presses to work overtime and everyone with dollars noticed and started redeeming dollars for gold. the trickle became a flood so Nixon had no choice to close the gold window to keep gold in the vaults and avoid bankruptcy. A default somewhere along the line became only a technical bankruptcy.

Welcome to floating currencies tied to the dollar that was tied to ...nothing.

Enter the world of the shit-storm of money printing and the emergence of the petro-dollar.

Exit rational monetary policy which was never really rational in the first place. Good as gold was replaced by faith.