This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Russian General Demands Preemptive Nuclear Strike Doctrine Against NATO
While NATO is contemplating its existential purpose in a world where the Cold War has suddenly come back with a vengeance, and the military alliance has found itself woefully unprepared to deal with a Russia which no longer accepts the supremacy of the west (appropriately enough NATO is doing this on a golf course) Russia is also strategizing, only instead of issuing "sharply-worded catchphrases" and hashtags, a Russian general has called for Russia to revamp its military doctrine, last updated in 2010, to clearly identify the U.S. and its NATO allies as Moscow's enemy number one. That in itself is not disturbing: we reported as much yesterday and is merely more rhetorical posturing. Where things, however, get very problematic is that the general demands that Russia spell out the conditions under which the country would launch a preemptive nuclear strike against the 28-member military alliance.
Moscow Times reports that Russia's military doctrine, a strategy document through which the government interprets military threats and crafts possible responses, is being revised in light of threats connected to the Arab Spring, the Syrian civil war and the conflict in Ukraine, the deputy chief of the Kremlin's security council told RIA Novosti on Tuesday.
That however is the soundbite for politically correct media purposes. Because within the Defense Ministry there are voices calling for different priorities.
"First and foremost, the likely enemy of Russia should be clearly identified in this strategic document, something absent from the 2010 military doctrine. In my view, our primary enemy is the U.S. and the North Atlantic bloc," General Yury Yakubov, a senior Defense Ministry official, was quoted as saying by Interfax.
If this sounds like a statement taken right out of the (first) Cold War, one involving the whole nuclear arms race, is because it is. The 2010 doctrine defines NATO expansion as a threat to Russian national security and reaffirms its right to use nuclear weapons in a defensive posture, but stops far short of declaring NATO as Moscow's primary adversary and laying preemptive nuclear strike scenarios on the table, a posture unmistakably reminiscent of the Cold War.
At the basis of this dramatic escalation is none other than Russia's stated response to what it perceives as a clear expansionary NATO threat.
Yakubov said the information war being waged over the crisis in Ukraine — where the West accuses Russia of arming separatists fighting the government in Kiev — and NATO's announcement that it would establish a permanent military presence in Eastern Europe have validated earlier fears that the alliance's claims of non-aggression toward Russia were insincere.
And the punchline: the general added that special attention should be paid to integrating the functions of the newly created Air and Space Defense Forces with Russia's land, sea and air based nuclear forces. "In addition, it is necessary to hash out the conditions under which Russia could carry out a preemptive strike with the Russian Strategic Rocket Forces," he said.
One can be certain that this is precisely what Russia will do.
So what happens next?
Recall what former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said in November 2008 in his first presidential address to the Russian people: "Russia will deploy Iskander missile systems in its enclave in Kaliningrad to neutralize, if necessary, the anti-ballistic missile system in Europe." An anti-ballistic missle system also known as NATO.
Which it did less than a year ago, long before the Ukraine civil war was headline news every day. This is what happened the last time Russia flexed its nuclear deterrence muscles, in November of 2013.
Russia has stationed missiles with a range of about 500 kilometers in its Kaliningrad enclave and along its border with the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Germany’s Bild-Zeitung reports, citing defense officials it didn’t identify. Satellite images show a “double-digit” amount of mobile units identified as SS-26 Stone in NATO code. Missiles were stationed within the past 12 months. SS-26 can carry conventional as well as nuclear warheads.
This is merely Russia being true to its warning word. From April 2012:
Moscow reiterated on Tuesday it may deploy Iskander theater ballistic missiles in the Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad that will be capable of effectively engaging elements of the U.S. missile defense system in Poland.
NATO members agreed to create a missile shield over Europe to protect it against ballistic missiles launched by so-called rogue states, for example Iran and North Korea, at a summit in Lisbon, Portugal, in 2010.
The missile defense system in Poland does not jeopardize Russia’s nuclear forces, Army General Nikolai Makarov, chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, said.
“However, if it is modernized…it could affect our nuclear capability and in that case a political decision may be made to deploy Iskander systems in the Kaliningrad region,” he said in an interview with RT television.
“But that will be a political decision,” he stressed. “So far there is no such need.”
A little over two years later, there is a need.
Which means forget "little green men" in Ukraine. Think massive Russian Iskander ICBM systems planted on the border with Poland, Ukraine, the Baltics and all across Russia Western border, and the furious screamfest this would waterfall into.
We can't wait to see how algos will spin such pre-emptive steps to a very mushroom cloudy World War III...
»
- 77243 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Silly paper!
Didn't anyone figure that rocks and scissors would win?
Unless that piece of land, half way across the world, is strategically important to maintaining hedgemony. With the added benefit of keeping Russia on its heels.
The empire, sadly, will not back down. Hopefully it never comes to something like this.
And ZH is fearmongering by touting the most logical and normal response to the warmongering, encirclement, threatening of Russia, as ESCALATION.
No, the escalation is done by those who spent 5 bn $ for a coup in Ukraine. By those who were shooting on Feb. 20. on both sides on Maidan! Those who were escalating thing sin Odessa with more than 45 dead. Those who shot down MH17 and tried to blame Russia!
Russia is only defending itself.
Oh and btw, where on the globe is Russia and what the hell is USrael doing in Ukraine?
Just because we have been playing dirty in the shadows doesn't mean that Russia cannot escalate. If Russia's military doctrine is rewritten to name us explicitly as enemies and spell out the conditions for a preemptive nuclear strike, you can take that as a red line. A real red line, unlike the kind that the golfer-in-chief draws.
Right, they have laid down their cards. The question is, how does the west respond? Lets just hope they are really as inept as we all believe them to be, and they fuck this up without any shots (any additional) fired.
It is their ineptness that scares the shit out of me. Even if nuclear war is not the goal, they might do something that kicks one off anyway. I have little doubt that Russia will launch first if enough of them become convinced that a nuclear exchange is inevitable.
El, it's NOT ineptness. Keep in mind that one can really only go so far in poker with a shitty hand. Russia clearly has a superior hand (resources and proximity to the contested/heated areas [shorter supply line routes])- there is no reason for them to fold it.
Eventually, a LOT of humans are going to perish. If not by war then by other means (I think most know what they could be, so no need to elaborate).
I have to wonder whether TPTB (on both sides) really would have any safe place to go should a nuclear war break out. If you can answer this question (with accuracy) then you'd likely then know how it will go...
I really don't think that TPTB understand the weapons that they control. I've had discussions with a now deceased man who was on the Manhatten Project and another very old man who got to watch the Hood Shot, which was 74kt. According to both of them, you really cannot comprehend the devistation of a nuclear weapon without witnessing one first hand. Very few people alive today have actually witnessed one.
Not a big one, but lots of us have seen Fukushima's reactors blow. And the fallout is 1,000,000,000,000,000 times worse.
Once China cones in on Russian side - the combination of nuclear and overwhelming number of people over so many time zones will preserve the resources that Russia has and US will have a Europe totally freaked out - US may be check mated but not before - they are committed to total destruction that Europe will act - DC believes the US population is considered Labor not citizens subject to replacement - fuck them!
Goldman was hired to help with the Alibaba IPO. There's nothing but a dark cloud hanging over China, with a bad smell of sulphur.
How do you say 'Lucifer' in Chinese?
"How do you say 'Lucifer' in Chinese?"
Lùxifa / Lùxifu :: Lucifer (Satan's name before his Fall in Jewish and Christian mythology)
Why do you think, the US ZOG dropped two atomic bombs on Japan but not one since then? Because of the concept of MAD (mutual assured destruction). This concept has been the foundation of stability.
And why do you think, is ZOG positioning anti rocket systems around Russia?
Because they want to remove Russia's ability to defend itself against a nuclear attack. As soon as that would be the case, ZOG would again begin to drop atomic bombs!
So you better pray, the Russians keep their ability of MAD otherwise the enemy of mankind will go berserk.
And McStain is in Kiev spouting more insane shit. Says US must provide Ukraine with anti-tank weapons. The same kind they gave to ISIS, I guess.
The crippled cocksucker must have stock on those weapons manufacturers.
As if American Javelin missiles had not already been captured by the novorossyian forces after being delivered as non-lethal aid by Canada.
USrael is a type of cancer which is killing human beings around the world
the only treatment that might help is Radiotherapy.
So, spell it out for me:
Russia/Putin is an enemy of the Deep State or part of it? (I feel a strange Cognitive Dissonance rooting for a preemptive strike against myself.)
Is the term "Deep State" sufficiently and intentionally vague to cover the known unknowns, so to speak?
I want a list...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads#Storyline
This movie pretty much spelled it all out. Read the plot and be shocked/scared/shitting down your leg.
If we had a media network with any independence and guts they'd also be playing Dr Strangelove all month.
on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AUYCnzmDJY
+1
Takes place in Sheffield. No need for any special effects for destruction and desolation.
Good link After watching this video, a setting of 1980s, one may not want to live post nuke war today.
Threads (1984) Full Movie
Published on Sep 17, 2013
Clearer version than the one currently available, of the classic British nuclear war movie. Scary, realistic, and brutal telling of a story about ordinary people in Sheffield and what would happen in the event of a nuclear conflict.
Even though this is an 80s film, and it's from that cold war era. I still think it's very thought provoking and relevant Have we dodged the bullet? Time as always, will tell.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AUYCnzmDJY
What do you expect?
The US and its butt-buddies in Europe are waging economic warfare. I'm surprised this didn't happen sooner.
The US has a history of economic warfare.
No one really wants war, but I think Russia's military capabilities have been WOEFULLY over exagerrated.
(To keep us constantly investing and innovating).
The MIC we always complain about has kept us lightyears ahead of the rest of the pack.
ISIS, if you were to believe the press, went from a non entity about a month ago, to a top 5 super power.
Seriously!?
Their ability conquer and hold both Western Europe and America, definitely. Their ability to defend Russia? I don't think so.
^This^
When it comes to fending off an invasion, those fuckers will not give up.
Same as Germany 70 years ago. Sure on a plain battlefield with equal numbers German technology would just clean the filed. But the Russian never back down and this time the war wont be over when CNN runs the headlines "We won!". You "won" Iraq ... mission acomplished... with that kind of a victory I do just can not imagive what a loss would look like :)
" I think Russia's military capabilities have been WOEFULLY over exagerrated."
And you therefore suggest we provoke them into letting the nukes fly in order to find out?
A remarkably stupid bet, as leading edge nukes are the one military asset they are sure to have made their top defense priority.
The only thing more incompetent than the Russian military is the Ukranian military.
The old, retired guys are doing a pretty good job in Novorussiya.
They seemed mighty competent indeed in the campaingn to free South Ossetia from the Georgian invasion and their incursion into Georgia.
The campaign was over in 8 hours, finished for all practical purposes by Russian paratroopers and air cover before the tanks even arrived. The izzy troops and American mercs folded quickly. A stern lesson for Eastern European Countries that think a few outside troops and adivisors guarantee success.
@ MrPalladium and any other,
any reference what really happened in Georgia theater back then, just day(s) before the opening 2008 Beijing Olympics?
I just remember to watch in teevee the spectacular scenes of the obviously distressed face of the fatty Saakashvili biting his tie and the other one, wagged his big ass to go to the hide-out in fear
And you are probably coming to this conclusion because... you are exceptional, and they are not, right?
Nothing could possibly go wrong.
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/
"The controversial NATO sponsored report entitled “Towards a Grand Strategy for an Uncertain World: Renewing Transatlantic Partnership“.
Uhh, that's not a NATO report. It was produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) which is an academic center within Georgetown University. NATO has never given funds to CSIS.
In addition, NATO does not have nuclear weapons, though of course NATO member states the United States, the United Kingdom, and France do. NATO does not govern the development, employment, or doctrine for the use of these weapons, which has always been a concern of other NATO member states, especially Germany, who thought the US very willing to fight a nuclear war in Germany or western Europe to avoid one in the US.
"...especially Germany, who thought the US very willing to fight a nuclear war in Germany or western Europe to avoid one in the US."
Well, there has been a lot of field testing with theatre nukes in the last few years.
Preparing the Chessboard for the “Clash of Civilizations”: Divide, Conquer and Rule the “New Middle East”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/preparing-the-chessboard-for-the-clash-of-c...
Indeed some psychopathic neocons do believe that a nuclear war is WINNABLE!
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky cuts through the chaos and deception to show the reader exactly how and why humanity is facing an existential threat. It is a wake-up call that the world is being pushed towards catastrophic conflict. SYRIA is one of the targets to take over (in near future), with the next one is IRAN!!!
Prof. Chossudovsky shows that, incredibly, the same deception that the Western governments and media perpetrated to facilitate the war on Iraq less than a decade ago is now being repeated with Iran. But the real threat to world peace and the future of humanity is not Iran and its non-existent nuclear weapons program – it is the US-led alliance of NATO powers and their Middle East partners, Israel, Turkey and the handful of Gulf Arab monarchs.
The real agenda behind the drive for war is imperialist control of natural resources in a region that possesses some 60 per cent of all known reserves of oil and gas – the lifeblood of the capitalist global economy. Cloaked with the fictitious cover of “war on terror”, “international security” and “humanitarian intervention”, realities are being turned upside down.
The agenda for global control of resources is a long-term dynamic that Washington and its NATO allies have had on the drawing board for decades. The nine-year war on Iraq is but one episode of this unfolding scheme of conquest. The NATO-orchestrated regime change in Libya is also part of this military roadmap, which now has Iran in its sights. BUT this war lust will NOT stop with IRAN. It is about global conquest by Western powers in which ultimately CHINA and RUSSIA are also marked out as future enemies.
Disturbingly, the US-led agenda of permanent war has incorporated the doctrine of pre-emptive strikes with ALL military options, including the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons and a new generation of so-called monster bombs. The imminent military showdown in the Persian Gulf could turn out to be not just a regional explosion of latent conflicts – it may be the trigger for a conflagration between global powers armed with nuclear arsenals capable of unleashing destruction that puts the very future of the planet in the balance.
The Western public has a vital task in preventing their governments’ drive for war.
“Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War“ by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky
http://www.globalresearch.ca/towards-a-world-war-iii-scenario-the-real-i...
WTF? Seriously, What.The.Fuck?
". . . the first use of nuclear weapons must remain “in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction . . ."
These pricks have really outdone them selves. And I thought they could never top the 'logic' of "we had to destroy the village to save it."
Roast in Hell Motherfuckers!
This article is click bait. Seems to me it's almost time to leave ZH, she is dying as bad as Digg died.
She revealed the truth about Obama a few weeks back. Accidents happen.
Nothing those on ZH didn't know long ago.
I thought maybe she mentioned that Frank Marshall Davis is Obama's real father.
Stop it...or another Blist celebrity gets it.
No but really, I heard here in India that Joan actually died from rabies after an interview with the baby of your Jaysee and Beyose, their little baby called "Blue Virus" bit her and she contracted Rabies.
That's what I heard....
Nope, It's Richard Pryor. See his first black president sketch circa 1977 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaXxl5Pc6As
Also http://wellaware1.com/artwork/large/Channel-Art-Template-(Photoshop)-32).jpg
http://wellaware1.com/artwork/large/like-father-like-son.jpg <---The child Barry / Richard are striking!
That first link, check out Robin Williams standing in the back of the room, as a photographer lol
Richard Pryo calls the Neutron Bomb a "neo-pacifist weapon", and the US has "no plans to enter the Middle East at this time".
LOL.
That first link didn't last long.
Wat? Did you just upvote yourself?
google up some images of Malcolm X and compare to the Prez...pretty close match I'd say
I liked Joan's comedy a lot and may she rest in peace. She was never afraid to say what she felt and never fell prey to the PC police which I deplore.
Agreed. She was a great guest host for Carson back in the day.
Hey absolutely. It's obvious that in the middle of the "Russian General Demands Preemptive Nuclear Strike Doctrine Against NATO" thread that the "locals" are calling for TMZ dialog that YOUR FUCKING COUNTRY IS TOAST!
Can we get back on track here? If not, Go watch your entrainment mind control appliance.
YOUR FUCKING COUNTRY IS TOAST!
Have caution my moronic friend. This toaster can toast a lot of bread at the same time.
You make as much sense as a slice of burnt toast!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL8UkGssg0o
Yeah. She was totally funny the last 20 years, while she was giving people 'color commentary' on celebrity outfits.
</s>
'You're dead, you deserve to be dead - you started it': Joan Rivers in astonishing attack on 'stupid' Palestinians (DailyMail UK, 8-Aug, beware pop-ups and shit)
Joan Rivers has said she has no sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza, declaring they 'deserve to be dead'. The 81-year-old comedian launched a furious rant outside a Los Angeles airport, saying that the Palestinians who do not leave their homes are ‘idiots’ and that 'at least the ones that were killed were the ones with very low IQs'.
She was just making friends all over the place, wasn't she? I do not believe she was died by TPTB. She had access to the best medical system and the most expensive treatments known.
She still died at age 81 with her mind intact (relative to those suffering from dementia etc.)
That is more than many here will get to experience.
You consider that remark about the Palestinians to be evidence of a sound mind?
@Herd..JR decided to point out the inconveninet truth about Michael Obama. She is a horrible racist homophobe and the world is better off without her cunning fashion insight mixed with racial hatred and transgender bashing. There is a particularly distasteful youtube circulating regarding FLOTUS and Venus Williams having all the anatomic markers of men, which needs to be shut down.
Thats rayciss agains' black women!
I don't think Michelle or the Williams' sisters are trannies. Thats misdirection from Golf Club Barry, and his papa, Frank Marshall Davis (i.e. he's not Muslim, or from Kenya, his pappy was a Chi-town Commie)
You read like a CFR funded coagitator. He is more Akenatun than Marshall-davis. No, I find the SNL cast HSEEP crisis actors and their connections to all western mediated world events far more compelling. Obama is Richard Pryors son, hands down, look at the photos on the above links.
the question is did joan die because of karma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-5Q7yuaXjM
or because obama
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Et38_Ufv-Jw
Joan got boned
Fuck you Tony Wilson.
You are a Cunt.
Google: PAKIstani rape UK
The truth will out eventually.
I heard Joan Rivers took the Kickbucket Challenge
god bless joan rivers, she told the truth. kind of like andrew.
0bombya will just give them a 15 yard penalty for unnecessary roughness.
Ebola, ISIS, world economic collapse, Russia/US WWIII.
I would feel more confident if Ron Paul was leading our nation.
You will never know the true leaders of 'merica. They are that well hidden. Elected puppets are just that.
Corollary: If you can get to them, they're not the ones you're looking for.
Gotta nuke the entire site....
Sometimes a hunter needs to be able to identify the game trail first before they can find the prey.
You can't get them or at least get the right ones if you can't find them either.
The masses would never support the platform of a candidate like Ron Paul. Even if he did catch some sort of grassroots wave, the big corporate vested interests would never permit meaningful reform. There are too many ways now to keep his ilk sidelined and marginalised.
- Mark Twain
The masses don't understand issues or care about them; they just choose based on personality and the opinions of their neighbors. They would have supported Dr. Paul if the media had given him fair coverage, and if Republican Party leaders had not cheated to prevent him from winning.
Ron Paul is probably extremely happy to not be leading the nation. Face it - the situation is proper fucked , everybody in power knows it ,
Sometimes it is not a good idea to poke the Russian Bear, lest it knock the head off your shoulders.
Among many reasons I like the Russian style of communication, the Russian people just talk less and cause much less noise when they're talking, yet when they're talking, they really mean it, their words mean business, and their actions are real.
Their characters call for respect and show the trustworthiness.
And it gets worse. Russia left nuclear weaponry in the dust a long time ago. Big Boyz today play with SCALAR WEAPONRY. Posted four years ago by Tom Bearden:
from:
http://www.rense.com/general58/deo.htm
We are at the point now where it becomes crucial to identify the entity who used directed energy technology to bring down the WTC on Sept. 11. Hey whaddya know? That 13th anniversary is coming right up.
Nice bit of abstruse quackery and catastrophe porn (typical Rense?), but AE911Truth has uncovered plenty of dirt about the WTC towers without venturing into science fiction. More imminent threats lie in plain sight, like the weaponization of food:
SECRETS OF SUGAR (Fifth Estate, 2013)
Downvoted you cos you make out like you know how WTC was turned to DUST. No beef about the authenticity of AE911ers, but sugar certainly didn't bring down the 1,2 or 7. Why dont you have a couple of spoonsful to help your red herring go down...
Try this 'join the dots dots' by Catherine Austin Fitts about how all the trillions from US taxpayers got to the black ops and secret space programmes. When Raygun 'cancelled' Star Wars, did you believe him?
Catherine Austin Fitts - Secret Space Program & The Black Budget - Red Ice Radio -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cKZ0HKbijQ
Breakaway Civilzation Pt. 1 with Dr. Joseph Farrell - Solari REport
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f7wOxw4fQI
Downvoted you because you rip my food comment out of context. The rest is acknowledged.
ever heard of haarp?
Where were you guys like 9 years ago?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/10/AR200509...
Ever see a suitcase nuke?
...
I bet they're bloody well iPhone sized by now.
>>>Ever see a suitcase nuke?
The "Hood" device, largest-ever thermonuclear explosion in continental USA, was 12 inches in diameter, 42 inches long.
Kinda cool? Well, hot?
"In my view, our primary enemy is the U.S. and the North Atlantic bloc," General Yury Yakubov
Not so fast, Gen. Yabukov! IBID: "In my view, our primary enemy is the Hidden Globalist Owners of the the US and NATO"
You may want to keep a few dozen of your toys for the True Globalist Owners, by making them the FIRST TARGET of any launch. I would, if I were you -- if I still had my job after such a reckless and unproductive comment.
Let us just hope it is an 'unproductive' comment...
why not take 50 missiles and focus on the various members of the rothschild and rockefeller families plus Israel and there will be no one to call the audible plays in real time
"why not take 50 missiles"
uugghhhh, because its "the various members of the rothschild and rockefeller families plus Israel"....who have "control" of the fucking things....
...I know I'm goin out on a limb here....
Please, Omen IV...no more comments....just drink until its over.....
A bit of anthrax in the ventilation system at the next Bilderberg meeting would at least take out the middle management.
Jim Willie's current take on Germany ditching the West and embracing the East:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgOUazLGdhc&list=UUx-BKQDYIzUveyfi9nd6ZlQ
No. It's not "on". First it is a Russian general (Who?), not Comrade Putin. Second, Putin is KGB and a master chess player when it comes to disinformation, etc. While it is fun to sit here and go over all the nuke options and possibilities it is not even remotely likely.
My guess is that this is the way you throw a message and even a bluff out there. You get a general who is under orders to leak a threat to use nukes. This looks like not so subtle warning against intervention. Putin has more or less seen our bet and raised it. He may raise it enough to call our bluff and only then will things get dangerous...if we are not bluffing and he is not bluffing.
For now, I think this is just a warning and a message. In fact, it is a bluff at this point.
"No. It's not "on"."
What other choice do they have....it is clear he US is gearing up for a strike...it ain't the silly divsion of bumblefucks they're assembling....
It may not be "big-N" nuke either...most likely EMP and mini-nukes tactically "placed" ....not launched.....
Or....the "fake alien invasion" will "stop us from destroying ourselves"....which will prompt the "New World Order" world government...digital monetary system with all of us "chipped"....in order to combat the "invading" Project Blue Beam "aliens"....done.
It is not clear the U.S. is gearing up for any kind of strike. In fact, if you look at Obama he is reactive, not proactive. He doesn't even like foreign policy.
The rest of the stuff sounds like you need some meds.
I might have to apologize. I just read that Russia seems to have kidnapped an Estonia border officer after being warned about war in Estonia. That is a direct spit in your eye maneuver.
I still cannot interpret what it means but Putin is no fool. He has a plan or senses major weakness.
So, maybe it is "On".
"Hopefully someone will stop them, but I just don't see how."
When you are dealing with ego's so massive that to admit they are wrong equals death, I just don't see how either.
Putin knows Whitehouse (back nine) has Bluffmeister in Chief running the show. This is Bluffmeisters repeat "I dare you to cross this line" intimidation tactic. Probably the same thing he used on the playground...with Caucasion kids who are imtimidated by a quasi-black kid. But, Bluffmeister is putting all light skinned (inferior melanin ratioed) humans in the same bucket. Russians are NOT like wimpy sissified Americans. Russian dudes actually like fighting. So this doesn't work in Bluffmeisters favor at the poker table of life. I only pray that Bluffmeister's tactics don't end up taking the lives of thousands of soldiers.
We don't have a White House. It's a White Bath, members only.
"members only."
ROFLMAO!!!! Will you be here all week???? Fuck...will "we" be here all week.....?
Still classic.....you intended the "double entendre" (Michelle tranny) right?
Better pull out my old homework...
Unbunch your panties you fucking drama queens!
What are you guys talking about, saying this is a crappy time to be alive? I've been waiting for this my whole life!
Let's go sunning...it's so good for you...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txPqV0lZaSE
@SMG
Joel Skousen sounds like a wacko...
Thats some farfetched shit man.
That entire pc. reads like a terminator movie script, with a complete lack of any mention of Israel except "Israel clearly being the target". apparently, even during worldwide nuclear armageddon they would be the victims, with no roll whatsoever...sure.
Now if he wrote that Russia, and China where going to preemptively nuke the entire planet because they where pushed to it, that i could almost believe..
Joel Skousen has his expertise, but a Big Picture guy he is definitely not.
"What a crappy time to be alive."
In roughly two years, half of us will be dead from Ebola (patented). Same with the Russians. At what point do they decide they've got nothing to lose?
Same with the Chinese.
Extinction Level Events are so complicated in the beginning, but fairly clear once underway.
@ SMG:
Stop them.... ?
Well, thinking one can kick the Russian Bear in the nuts and walk away scot-free is insane.
If lucky one only has their arms ripped off - if unlucky, probably lose their head as well.
Solution: "leave the f*cking bears alone - they weren't bothering us before we pissed-them-off"
Enjoy, Millenials!!!!!
This is the shit us Boomers had to grow up with and "re-live" under Reagan....
Nice, huh?
How's that hairline doing now?
the nukular option?
wow putin must be long spx puts
until he cover and goes long...then he'll take the nukular option off the table and market will rally
i think i'm getting the hang of this
+1000
Quote: You mean, HOLY SHITSKI!
Nope...he is Russian not Polish...HOLY SHITSKY!
There...fixed for you. :)
svyatoye der'mo
i hope they only have 1 target .... DC .... then theyd be doing us a favor .... id feel bad for innocents but amerika with our kindler gentler machine gun hand blows up innocents all over the world every day .... the fallout over the atlantic would be less than what fukushima will be pumping out every year from here to infinity .... geez this is a truly bizzare time to be alive
You have to go for the whip hands: London and NYC.
DC is just useful idiot territory.
I'd pitch in $5 to go for the trinity.
Don't be alarmed, Obama will easily understand that this is just like calling out "Playing Thru" in Golf..
Like 'Fore!' play with a bear.
Keep in mind that, I believe it was Clinton or Bush Jr. that changed our strategy from fire on warning to fire after 1st contact. Meaning that currently the USA is supposed to absorb the 1st strike and then launch the counter strike. If I remember the quote from a Senior ranking (possible joint chief) military offical he said, "strike with what?". At that point we would already of been nuked. I don't like esculating this but the USA's policy should be changed back to fire on warning. I don't have a bunker to hide in.
Think they'll target DC as part of the preemptive strike?
No, Only their Tesla store.
do you really think you can nuke a seriously big country... and life on the planet survives? hello, it does not matter
MAD is so simple: attack, and all die
the subs could launch but i agree with you.
I'm 80 miles over the mountains from Los Angeles and nothing much else nearby of significance to blow up other than Fort Irwin, another 60 miles away and Twentynine Palms Marine Base about thirty miles away.
I, for one, wouldn't miss DC, LA, or even Lost Wages, NV... Sun glasses stay in my truck. There might be some glare from Twentynine Palms.
"strike with what?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment
This and other advanced weapons the American taxpayer knows nothing about. The elites will ride out the initial exchange of ICBMs in the D.U.M.Bs then unleash the space based weapons on Moscow, Beijing, etc...
Submarine fleets have kinda made the preemptive thing meaningless... Everyone still gets annihlated in the end. Whatever... if it happens all I'll see a a bright flash for 1/100 of a second, then...
Barry doesn't have those sympathetic characters like Kolon Powell or Kondee Lice lie thru their teeth to con the public.
True dat, Susan Rice and ol' horseface will have to suffice this time around.. Poor Barry, lucky for him most of America are stupid World News Tonight believing sheep.
Condoleezza Rice is a mexican food dish Obama is tracking down find his new child labor voting constituents. Free phone, and ACA medical care. You will receive amnesty if you vote Democrat in our next election.
Michelle is happily digging up voters at their grave sites to populate DNA Information in dead voting contribution.
Michelle and I endorse Hillary 2016..
Clown bombs. Saving the petrodollar under the disquise of humanitarian efforts.
I don't make up the rules, just see through the propaganda. They won't survive the next purging. Count on that.
Nice capture of a dead person who cannot talk. If this happens, we need to penetrate the next level of onion. Seriously, not a joke.
Keep up the good work.
Add some lizard eyes...
It's comforting to know that we have such a strong President at the helm...
/sarc/
The satanic buttplugs in charge of the US nuclear arsenal have already penned their preemptive strike doctrine. I'm pleased Russia has responded in kind on one level. Afterall , the West will make war when the dollar fails if not before.
Buy more Gaz or we nuke you!!!
Where the fuck is Hillary? The 'preordained' next President Of The United States, and not a fuckin' word.
Where's her husband? He's always got shit to say. Hell, he went to school in Moscow. He must have something 'insightful' to say.
Trying to avoid the shit sticking to their clothes. Far too fucking late for that.
NATO is dead...
https://www.perpetualassets.com/news/2014/09/04/nato-dead-king-dollar-wr...
"It is becoming excruciatingly clear that the Global Axis of Fascism is the US, UK, and its leash holder in the SouthEast Mediterranean."
They aren't exactly ICBMs unless continents are 500km apart, or is it 500miles. Either way, these are not a huge deal and a reasonable reaction. Have they fired them yet? No. Stop sweating it. Putin is tough but not suicidal. He'll make a stand and take what can be taken but his real offensive weapon is fuel.
Come on. Wake up and at least think. I do not care who you find to be "evil" here. But at least look at who the frig is lying to you between your Kardashian/Bachelor shows and worship of rapper idiots.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/more-lies-from-nato-russias-aggression-against-ukraine-threatens-our-freedom-security-and-prosperity-anders-fogh-rasmussen/5399496
As a European it is so good to know, that the next war in Europe, for which the US-necons work so hard to rescue the US$, not only European and Russian cities will burn, but US-cities as well! Tell that Obamao and stop this desatrous policy!!!
Our idiots in Washington, announced not to recently, about our change in our strategic policy. From taking the first hit, then retaliation, to first strike if we feel an emanate threat from China or Russia. Now we have started a new arms race for hypersonic boost glide weapons systems. This new weapon leaves no detectable signature, horizontal trajectory, no arc reentry from space, that we have counter measures for and travels 5 times the speed of sound. China had 1 successful launch and the last one blew up. We’ve had 2 failed attempts. So what happens when the first country acquires it, will they use it like we did on Japan?
Cold war is back. I don't think Russia would 'announce' a preemptive nuclear strike....
Time to add SPF10,000 and Welders Googles/Glasses to my bug out bag.
This cold war 2.0 sure seems like it's getting hot.
That one way thingy to Mars is sounding better and better.
Until you realise your podmate is a LARPer named HAL.
The cannibal revolution will not be televised, it will only be available as a Pay-Per-View subscription on Netflix.
My neighbor claims he used his inheritance buying several acres on the moon. I didn't know you could do that ... unless he ran into a RE/NAR scammer of super proportions. Perosnally, if things go Nukular I am not sure there's any place to hide since only Roaches and Keith Richards will prob survive (and maybe that Babe from Baywatch who is filled with plastic nowadays).
Ozzie stands a good chance.
@ Not Too Important:
Nancy Polisi will still be around - nothing to date seems capable of getting rid of her!
.
SPF is bad for your health and may result in a costly and prolonged cancer treatment. Nukes will kill you faster, depending on your distance from the epicenter.
Nearly all conventional sunscreen products contain cancer-causing chemicals