I think I am reading that Scotland's senior citizens/pensioners voted this down. I ask why, and conclude, admittedly based on little information, that the proponents of Scottish independence did an insufficient job of assuring those senior citizens that their pensions, into which many of them had contributed all their working lives, would not be stolen. It would seem that, if Scotland has the oil, and therefore would have the oil money, that enough of that money could be directed to the pensions so that no pensions would be stolen. I hope the independence proponents try again, and next time work harder at making the math clear for their senior citizens.
I always want to see the math. For example, does anyone here have the math on how much more the average USA Social Security pensioner is taking out than he put in when he was working? I did the math for myself, by going back and finding out what I had put in every year of my life, converting that to ounces of gold at the average price of gold for that year, and then taking my "payout" and projecting it forward with 2% "cost of living adjustment" increases" every year, to the age when I am supposed to die, and based on 2014's price of gold. Came out just about exactly even. Of course, 2014's price of gold, in my opinion, is below average, and if the Chinese and others who want an alternate reserve currency prevail, perhaps the price of gold will double, or whatever. If it doubles, then I will have put in twice as many ounces of gold as I will take out. And I have the good fortune to be alive. A lot of Americans who paid into Social Security didn't live long enough to get any "payout". Who got that money? On the other hand, Social Security also seems to have been adopted by Congress and the Presidents as being the primary source of "charity" money for those who can't work, or "can't" work, or whom "we" need to rescue from political turmoil in other countries. So Congress and the Presidents get to look "charitable", but the bill for that charity is actually paid by Social Security payers - common working Americans. Anyway, I wish the smart people here would do some math on this, and show me if they think I am mistaken. But my conclusion is that Social Security pensioners aren't getting anything for nothing, and aren't asking for anything for nothing.
Too many old people. The young ones with nothing to lose were overwhelmingly in favor of separation. Wait another few years. In the meantime just set back and watch it unfold. You guys are half-bright, but you should know you are nothing special - there have been many sitting in declining empires who saw what was happening. You are not exceptional. The exceptional ones do not express tired negativity, they grow more sharp as the days progress and help future generations prepare. But maybe that is asking too much; particularly from Amerikan men who are tired beyond their years.
Too many young people. I would help future generations prepare by advising them to have fewer children. There are more children every day, but there is less planet every day, so there are fewer resources per child every day. All wars are fights for resources. More children = more wars. More wars = less freedom, as well as less happiness and more suffering.
this probably wasn't too much different than the 2008 US election, driven by voters self interest. for a large number of individuals scottish independence represents a threat to their income and security. the free scotland movement needs more than patriotic emotion, they need to produce a balance sheet that will demonstrate how an independent Scotland can remain solvent.
but thats the problem. the american founders offered nothing but hardship. many had death warrants on their heads and had their homes, lands and businesses confiscated or burned. some may have had notions that things might be better if successful, but few were offered sign on bonuses, iphones, ebt or healthcare. they froze and starved on promises of occasional payment in near worthless script, and the hope to be able to live life without government oppression.
if somebody can only be moved based entirely on financial gain, then freedom and independence is not really for them. how independent can you be if you need someone else's fiat promises in order to act?
if the scots need more and bigger versions of the status quo to act, then all they'll end up with is more of the same thing they're leaving.
I’m looking forward to the next round. Something tells me this isn’t over.
All wars and power shifts throughout history (real or fantasy) seem to have taken place on the margin, where the choice was between the lesser of two evils, not heaven and hell. And where would we be if we didn’t challenge the status quo and TPTB from time to time and prove to them there really are limits to just how far they can go. Our complacency is the greatest source of their power.
I do not know how anyone took this seriously from the beginning. What a lot of hot air to get the British Pound into the gutter and keep it there. It is almost as bad as the Aussie Dollar, which it seems the RBA just has to talk down and it follows.
The Scotts are about as independent as their football teams. What a laugh, just like that cute Scottish accent.
I know man, when you realize the "dream is over", and your people are enslaved, it's a harsh bitch of a day!! It's why most sheeple in this Keynesian shitshow, stay willfully plugged right into the matrix!!
When the "analysis" of the votes comes out, you'll see that in Scotland, like America and the rest of Europe, the entitlement, retirement, and welfare system for the over 55-60 crowd, carried the day for the NO camp!!
Because the evil genius designed into the very fabric of the Keynesian shitshow, is the encouragement of complete and utter irresponsibility, laziness, indebtedness, and victim hood, regardless of your race, gender, or creed, for ones entire life!!
So when one reaches 55-85 years old and has bought this horseshit economic system, lock, stock and barrel, of course your ONLY choice is too continue with more of the same!!!!
A wonderfully effective exercise in hope inflation followed by rapid deflation. Mind your P's and Q's and we might just leave you with some cold gruel.
<The 'rules' won't be changed via the ballot box. At what point will we learn this simple lesson?>
The rules are rarely changed in revolution as well, at least in favor of the masses. More often than not something far worse fills the vacuum. Your moniker aptly describes the predicament we find ourselves in. Will one of the 7.5 billion humans on this rock ever devise a third option? Or will mans primitive predisposition to dominate others rule the day until we are wiped from this place like a stain on the kitchen counter?
Trust is the vice of the sheeple, trust in government, trust in elections,trust in the media, trust in leaders. These vices offer a temporary salve, followed by longer term decay.
Modern propaganda; hundreds of millions of pounds worth of it. They can sell you a magic Negro; and they know it. it works and that's why they pay for it. It's the Nuclear Option when the State needs the people to fall in line. Never the less; we are not blameless; I'm ashamed. There's a village in Scotland named for my family. We've come a long ways; straight down. Still feeling suicidal.
"And dying in your bed, many years from now, would you willing to trade all the days from this day to that, for one chance, just ONE CHANCE to come back here and tell our enemies they may take our freedom, but they will never take our PENSIONS!?!
Not only pensions. England subsidises Scotland to the tune of a NET (After Oil income) of GBP 30 BILLION per year. Also, there was so much uncertainty about important issues, currency etc., that IMHO this was a perfectly rational decision. The "Yes" campaign should have done a much better job of thrashing out the issues. The devil is in the detail.....?
Afterwards I put on my tinfoil hat and viewed this whole playlist : ISS AND SATELLITE HOAX (ever since I was a kid I was fascinated by space and science-fiction so I enjoyed watching)
I would love to get some opinions on this, because I find it (ISS-docu's) a fascinating and amusing conspiracy theory
Demographic gerrymandering at play in this referendum. That is why it would have never passed with a high turnout since the the higher the turnout the more likely it will split exactly along those lines.
There are probably more pensioners then youngins. It would be interesting to see how these numbers skewed when adjusted for population of the age groups.
I think I am reading that Scotland's senior citizens/pensioners voted this down. I ask why, and conclude, admittedly based on little information, that the proponents of Scottish independence did an insufficient job of assuring those senior citizens that their pensions, into which many of them had contributed all their working lives, would not be stolen. It would seem that, if Scotland has the oil, and therefore would have the oil money, that enough of that money could be directed to the pensions so that no pensions would be stolen. I hope the independence proponents try again, and next time work harder at making the math clear for their senior citizens.
William ya got any pic's of the Queen counting the Scotish Vote?
I assume the message is that $$$$ and fear trumped principle ,idealism and optimism and adventure once again.
I always want to see the math. For example, does anyone here have the math on how much more the average USA Social Security pensioner is taking out than he put in when he was working? I did the math for myself, by going back and finding out what I had put in every year of my life, converting that to ounces of gold at the average price of gold for that year, and then taking my "payout" and projecting it forward with 2% "cost of living adjustment" increases" every year, to the age when I am supposed to die, and based on 2014's price of gold. Came out just about exactly even. Of course, 2014's price of gold, in my opinion, is below average, and if the Chinese and others who want an alternate reserve currency prevail, perhaps the price of gold will double, or whatever. If it doubles, then I will have put in twice as many ounces of gold as I will take out. And I have the good fortune to be alive. A lot of Americans who paid into Social Security didn't live long enough to get any "payout". Who got that money? On the other hand, Social Security also seems to have been adopted by Congress and the Presidents as being the primary source of "charity" money for those who can't work, or "can't" work, or whom "we" need to rescue from political turmoil in other countries. So Congress and the Presidents get to look "charitable", but the bill for that charity is actually paid by Social Security payers - common working Americans. Anyway, I wish the smart people here would do some math on this, and show me if they think I am mistaken. But my conclusion is that Social Security pensioners aren't getting anything for nothing, and aren't asking for anything for nothing.
IF TSHTF, wanna bet the demographics in reverse are gonna be a real be-otch? Last I checked, Seniors ain't as mobile as they once was. ;-)
Sounds like they get to deal with a bunch of disapointed young people for a few years more....
NO Thanks, We'd rather be British Niggers...My apologies to African-Americans, no harm or insult intended...
Bloody apologist
This pic explains a great deal...
h/t @Dr_Revelator
Young Bankers Club?
Shining yuppies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCQ0vDAbF7s
Too many old people. The young ones with nothing to lose were overwhelmingly in favor of separation. Wait another few years. In the meantime just set back and watch it unfold. You guys are half-bright, but you should know you are nothing special - there have been many sitting in declining empires who saw what was happening. You are not exceptional. The exceptional ones do not express tired negativity, they grow more sharp as the days progress and help future generations prepare. But maybe that is asking too much; particularly from Amerikan men who are tired beyond their years.
Too many young people. I would help future generations prepare by advising them to have fewer children. There are more children every day, but there is less planet every day, so there are fewer resources per child every day. All wars are fights for resources. More children = more wars. More wars = less freedom, as well as less happiness and more suffering.
Of course, one must assume there is an equally disenchanted demographic in the rest of the United Kingdom.
That is the quiet secret.
Everything about the United Kingdom is a quiet secret. The United Kingdom is a kingdom of quiet secrets.
this probably wasn't too much different than the 2008 US election, driven by voters self interest. for a large number of individuals scottish independence represents a threat to their income and security. the free scotland movement needs more than patriotic emotion, they need to produce a balance sheet that will demonstrate how an independent Scotland can remain solvent.
but thats the problem. the american founders offered nothing but hardship. many had death warrants on their heads and had their homes, lands and businesses confiscated or burned. some may have had notions that things might be better if successful, but few were offered sign on bonuses, iphones, ebt or healthcare. they froze and starved on promises of occasional payment in near worthless script, and the hope to be able to live life without government oppression.
if somebody can only be moved based entirely on financial gain, then freedom and independence is not really for them. how independent can you be if you need someone else's fiat promises in order to act?
if the scots need more and bigger versions of the status quo to act, then all they'll end up with is more of the same thing they're leaving.
Yes! Economics and pragmatism is not everything to everybody - yet.
"Nation STATES (ie, GOVERNments)" are all bankrupt, including the corporation known as SCOTLAND Registered TradeMark.
Scots Northern English
The union jack is an interesting symbol...
I’m looking forward to the next round. Something tells me this isn’t over.
All wars and power shifts throughout history (real or fantasy) seem to have taken place on the margin, where the choice was between the lesser of two evils, not heaven and hell. And where would we be if we didn’t challenge the status quo and TPTB from time to time and prove to them there really are limits to just how far they can go. Our complacency is the greatest source of their power.
naw shame
I do not know how anyone took this seriously from the beginning. What a lot of hot air to get the British Pound into the gutter and keep it there. It is almost as bad as the Aussie Dollar, which it seems the RBA just has to talk down and it follows.
The Scotts are about as independent as their football teams. What a laugh, just like that cute Scottish accent.
So Mr. Banzai; is your new mission attacking the victims and mocking the oppressed ? Have you no shame ?
Have you no common sense, or sense of humor?
The "oppressed victims" seem to have voted to keep it that way, as was their right.
Maybe they'll rename the expression to "Edinburgh Syndrome".
I know man, when you realize the "dream is over", and your people are enslaved, it's a harsh bitch of a day!! It's why most sheeple in this Keynesian shitshow, stay willfully plugged right into the matrix!!
When the "analysis" of the votes comes out, you'll see that in Scotland, like America and the rest of Europe, the entitlement, retirement, and welfare system for the over 55-60 crowd, carried the day for the NO camp!!
Because the evil genius designed into the very fabric of the Keynesian shitshow, is the encouragement of complete and utter irresponsibility, laziness, indebtedness, and victim hood, regardless of your race, gender, or creed, for ones entire life!!
So when one reaches 55-85 years old and has bought this horseshit economic system, lock, stock and barrel, of course your ONLY choice is too continue with more of the same!!!!
I think you summed it up in a nutshell. Sad but true.
A wonderfully effective exercise in hope inflation followed by rapid deflation. Mind your P's and Q's and we might just leave you with some cold gruel.
<The 'rules' won't be changed via the ballot box. At what point will we learn this simple lesson?>
The rules are rarely changed in revolution as well, at least in favor of the masses. More often than not something far worse fills the vacuum. Your moniker aptly describes the predicament we find ourselves in. Will one of the 7.5 billion humans on this rock ever devise a third option? Or will mans primitive predisposition to dominate others rule the day until we are wiped from this place like a stain on the kitchen counter?
Trust is the vice of the sheeple, trust in government, trust in elections,trust in the media, trust in leaders. These vices offer a temporary salve, followed by longer term decay.
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao Tse Tung
The ballot box is dead.
"From time to time the tree of liberty must be watered with blood"
Modern propaganda; hundreds of millions of pounds worth of it. They can sell you a magic Negro; and they know it. it works and that's why they pay for it. It's the Nuclear Option when the State needs the people to fall in line. Never the less; we are not blameless; I'm ashamed. There's a village in Scotland named for my family. We've come a long ways; straight down. Still feeling suicidal.
Don't forget to take one with you.
Once there were brave Scot men who would not grovel. Now there are women and demi-men who are adept at grovelling.
There still are, but they live in America, along with the most intrepid Irish, English, etc. Good for us.
"And dying in your bed, many years from now, would you willing to trade all the days from this day to that, for one chance, just ONE CHANCE to come back here and tell our enemies they may take our freedom, but they will never take our PENSIONS!?!
good one
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESHIT!
Not only pensions. England subsidises Scotland to the tune of a NET (After Oil income) of GBP 30 BILLION per year. Also, there was so much uncertainty about important issues, currency etc., that IMHO this was a perfectly rational decision. The "Yes" campaign should have done a much better job of thrashing out the issues. The devil is in the detail.....?
WTF you on about.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCrone_report
It will start somewhere! If not the scots then some others.
United Ireland
The demographic skew pushed it over. Old folks worried about pensions and NHS.
Don't think they used electronic, hence the long time before results.
But TPTB and media did do a great job stirring up fear.
Talking about fear, according to this documentary, NASA is all about fear...
Don't know what to think of it, but at least it was entertaining to watch: The True History and Purpose of NASA
Afterwards I put on my tinfoil hat and viewed this whole playlist : ISS AND SATELLITE HOAX (ever since I was a kid I was fascinated by space and science-fiction so I enjoyed watching)
I would love to get some opinions on this, because I find it (ISS-docu's) a fascinating and amusing conspiracy theory
Demographic gerrymandering at play in this referendum. That is why it would have never passed with a high turnout since the the higher the turnout the more likely it will split exactly along those lines.
Despite having tried to rig it the other way by allowing 16 year-olds to vote?
There are probably more pensioners then youngins. It would be interesting to see how these numbers skewed when adjusted for population of the age groups.