MH-17 Report False Flag Exposed After Revelation Passenger Was Wearing Oxygen Mask

Tyler Durden's picture

When exactly a month ago the supposedly objective, impartial Netherlands released its official, 34-page preliminary report of the MH-17 crash over Ukraine, presumably based on black box data, air traffic control records, and other "authentic, verified" information, there were precisely zero mentions of "oxygen", "mask" or "oxygen mask."

Which is odd, because in what should become the biggest Freudian slip scandal in false-flag history, certainly since the Gulf of Tonkin, yesterday Dutch Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans accidentally revealed for the very first time ever, that one of the Australian passengers aboard the doomed airplane "appears to have donned an oxygen mask before the fatal crash, suggesting some on board might have been aware of their impending deaths, a Dutch official disclosed." Clearly a crucial aspect of the crash, as it points at the severity of the alleged explosion, yet one which was not noted until yesterday and which completely skipped the purvey of the official crash report for reasons unknown.

Needless to say, this makes a complete mockery of the story that the plane had exploded upon impact with the "Russian" missile, and is why there was supposedly no trace of any impact on the flight's black box recorder. Whether or not it also means that the alternative theory that a Ukraine jet had purposefully downed the Malaysian aircraft to serve as a pretext to implicate Russia, is unclear. But it also means that yet another conspiracy theory becomes fact: namely that whoever were the western powers who doctored and manipulated the "official" crash report of MH-17 to implicate Putin, not only lied but fabricated evidence.

Immediately upon realization just how serious the implications of this slip are, the damage control started, but it was too late. From the LA Times:

Dutch Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans apologized on Thursday for making the revelation on a television talk show the previous night, before the families of the 298 victims of the disaster had been notified of the disturbing discovery.


Timmermans gave an emotional speech at the United Nations four days after the crash in which he imagined the terrified passengers exchanging glances "one final time, in an unarticulated goodbye."


When talk show host Jeroen Pauw interviewed Timmermans on Wednesday night, he provoked the minister with accusations that he had dramatized the victims' last moments as a preliminary investigation report suggests that the Boeing 777's destruction was so swift that those on board were unlikely to have known anything was amiss.


"They did not see the rocket coming, but you know someone was found with an oxygen mask on his mouth?” Timmermans replied, according to the NL Times translation of his comments.  "He thus had the time to do that. We cannot rule it out."

Well, actually we did not know because the official report that your country released Mr. Timmermans, and which we posted a month ago said that "high-energy objects from outside the aircraft" struck the airplane as it flew at an altitude of 33,000 feet, suggesting it had been struck by a missile.

Nothing on the flight data or cockpit voice recorders indicated the crew or passengers took any action in response to the fatal impact.

Which means the entire report is a fabrication.

So what did happen?

The mask found around the neck of the unnamed passenger, one of 88 Australian citizens and residents on board, was tested for fingerprints, saliva and DNA but produced no forensic evidence, De Bruin said. "So it is not known how or when that mask got around the neck of the victim," he said.


The discovery of the mask and the implications it raised about the passengers' final moments were conveyed to the Australian's family before Timmermans' interview on Wednesday night, the prosecutor's office said. But information was sent out to other family members of the MH-17 victims only on Thursday morning.

Timmermans issued a statement Thursday saying he regretted making the comment. We are confident that everyone else in the false-flag waving Western camp very much regretted Timmermans' comment as well.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
NoWayJose's picture

The best part is that he tried to take one more swing at Russia by trying to show how the passengers 'suffered'.

insanelysane's picture

I don't believe in conspiracy theories.  For example the 30 something that could hack pacemakers up and died just before a conference where he was going to do a demonstration of hacking a pacemaker.  30 something, no medical history, just up and dies.

litemine's picture

Boing Stock should DROP. It seems that these airplanes sold to other countries are weapons of mass distruction .

It's time the world investigated the USA for any invovment in CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.








destruction....I know....just want to see who thinks spelling is morev important than the message...."Trolls" / "CIA"

highwaytoserfdom's picture

why was the plane flying there... USAF runs the air traffic control to protect the Russian, Iranian , Turkish NWO  poppy fields in Afghanistan.  To busy for Ukraine which will be renamed U_nato_or_overthrow_astan,  

Go away nothing here...   there will be no K for Vichy..   just mushrooms  getting fat and plump in $hit and dark...

jacship's picture

Hey Vlad

hope you like your B-Day gift

I know it's just a piece of   shot-up aluminum

That scrap is worth a thousand + words


hope the story about kitty isn't true






GooseShtepping Moron's picture

Let's assume for argument's sake that MH17 really was shot down by pro-Russian forces with a BUK. Still, it's not as if the missile operator had visual contact with the target and just decided to pull the trigger on a plane flying by, even though he did not really know who he was shooting at. The BUK has to be supported by radar, and a certain amount of radar support and target IDing likely was coming from inside Russia itself. They would know that it was a commercial airliner.

Therefore, the Western media has painted itself into a corner. In order to believe their version of events, one would have to believe that either a BUK missile operator was taking potshots at an unidentified target, or that Russia deliberately cooperated in shooting down MH17 knowing full well that it was a commercial flight.

I can only conclude that the only reason Putin does not vociferously dismiss the West's charges as absurd, is because in the process he would end up publicly revealing that he has been assisting the separatists (at least with radar support, if not in other ways).

I do not claim to know exactly who shot down this plane or why or how, but there does not seem to be ANY credible evidence that it was done either by pro-Russian forces in Ukraine or with a BUK surface-to-air missile.

Leraconteur's picture

You guys have almost NO logical cognitive ability.

Because there is no record of a passenger in a given seat donning an oxygen mask, this could not be possible and if it did this must have been a false flag?

Too much to dissect - your stupidity is vast.

viedoklis_lv's picture

That plane flew 10 kilometers up in the sky - how could anyone possibly see anything that high up in the sky?

Victor999's picture

Russian radar saw at least one fighter jet.  Radar can see at that height.  People can too, btw - an object 3 miles off the size of a fighter jet is easily discernible from the ground on a clear day.

Rock On Roger's picture

See them all the time in fly-over land.


Cities suck eh? Can't see the sky.

farmboy's picture

I agree let us not lead this one to firm conclusions. The only thing I can say is that I have no faith at all in the objectiveness from the Dutch government and mr Timmermans to present the plain and objective facts.

Joe A's picture

Frans Timmermans is an intelligent man but he also is vain, has a big ego, is a narcist and a megalomaniac. He couples this with great ambition and shameless selfpromotion. From the moment he became foreign minister he has only been lobbying for himself. Now he is going to be errant by for Juncker in the new EC.

-Edit. This is not the first 'accidental remark'. First time was in front of the UNSC when he said with teary eyes that people on the scene were stealing rings and juwelery from victims. Which turned out to be officials securing these items...

-Edit2. Journalists on the scene said they saw over 100 dead bodies without seeing one of them wearing an oxygen mask.

bid the soldiers shoot's picture

I have no respect for Timmermans either.  The farce surrounding the police detaining the Russian deputy ambassador and his wife and all that followed in that train was no doubt Timmermans' doing.

That said, until proven otherwise, I believe he will try to find the murderers of his countrymen. Only international intrigue could have delayed this 3 months.

Insofar as the journalists only saw 100 dead bodies, none wearing an oxygen mask, then the single wearer of the mask was among the 198 bodies the journalists did not see.

Joe A's picture

Well said. But the prosecutor's office already debunked the oxygen mask story.

bid the soldiers shoot's picture


The oxygen mask story is as unbelievable to me as Joe Biden's blame for ISIS on everybody but the US.

The Netherlands has more reason to find out the truth than any other nation.  

We know from Deputy Ambassador Borodin's ordeal that Timmermans is capable of playing games.  

But on the graves of 196 of his countrymen?

viedoklis_lv's picture

And how could we know if seperatists (AKA Putin regime goons) put that mask? Because it's them who didn't let anyone to the site for long time. And than only to part of it after a time to fix everything needed.

IShoutLOUDER's picture

The Dutch say it checked out for DNA etc. And if there was any sign of tampering they would have been all over it.

bid the soldiers shoot's picture


Just think how much more we would know if the Ukrainian Secret Police hadn't immediately confiscated the ATC recordings.

Or if the Western media bothered to write ONE story about that fact after we were originally told.


IShoutLOUDER's picture

Guys, MH17 was shot down by a BUK, not a jet. The missile approached from the front and detonated a few metres out from and slightly above the starboard cockpit. 70kg's of HE atomised that side, which is why no debris has been found of the starboard cockpit. The radial fragmentation carried on through the port side, which explains the "bullet holes". Damage on the port side wing tip is a grazing blow from that fragmentation.

The cockpit may have broken off immediately, or shortly afterwards. Regardless, the 777's massive tail stabilizers are enough to ensure inherent stability and the plane would have carried on straight and level, after veering slightly left from the force of the blast on the nose.

The loss of the cockpit caused gradually increasing damage to the fuselage and eventually inherent stability and aerodynamics were lost and the structure completely disintegrated.

No scenario involving jets explains the observed damage. It had to be a missile.

The sites of Ukrainian and rebel Buks are known. The mask is significant, because whether or not the rebel buk position was in range depends on the location of missile impact. If the flight continued eastwards after missile hit then the point of detonation is too far west of the rebel buk position, but within range of the ukrainin.

Thats why they left it out of the report.

fel.temp.reparatio's picture

It sounds like you're reading the 'official' report... go figure.

grekko's picture

It must have had something to do with E=MC^2.  That BUK explosion accelerated the plane closer to light speed, where time slows down and the passengers can now have the time to put on O2 masks.  It's just that old lying bastard, Mr. Physics.  Just like WTC7. 

Really, who you gonna believe, that lying bastard Mr. Physics, or those wonderful truthful politicians that think they rule us?  After all, you can't be a proper member of the sheep class without full belief in the Gov.  Would they lie to you?

farmboy's picture

Frans Timmermans is a rat. He has been bought and paid for with his new "assignment" as a vice president for the EU. That is why he is anti Russian because he must be pro EU = anti Russia. He is a socialist (from the Dutch Labour party) and nothing can prevent this kind of people of lying, cheating, crocidile tears and denying any evidence that is not covenient to him or the corrupt Dutch government that is in the pocket of the US government. A typical socialist that do everything for their career same like Dijsselbloem from the same Labour Part and totally incompetent chair for the EU finance commission.