This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The 5–Year Bond is Emblematic of Careless Risk Taking in Bond Markets

EconMatters's picture




 

By EconMatters

 

 

Dovishness Begets Excessive Risk Taking by Speculators

 

The Fed minutes came out this past week and they mentioned the strong dollar and less than stellar growth out of Europe, basically more over the top dovishness which just encouraged more unwise risk taking in the bond markets. This week Dallas Fed's Fisher said that they have identified areas of risk in markets, and James Bullard has said on several occasions that the markets are even behind the most dovish participants at the Federal Reserve regarding the forecasts for rate hikes, and the actual market actions of participants.  

 

Market participants may say that the Fed will raise rates mid-year in 2015, but they are speculating in bonds far out of touch with this reality. In other words, bond speculators just like any other speculators will push price as far as they can up until the last possible moment until they literally are forced out of the market by real fear of rate hikes, and the more dovish comments out of the Fed just reinforces this risky speculation.

The 5-Year Bond Yield is Under the Forecasted Fed Funds Rate for 2015 by the Fed

 

 

For example take the US 5-Year Bond trading with a Yield of 1.53%, remember this is for a 5 year time period, and if the Fed starts raising rates by June of 2015, roughly 8 months from today, the Fed has 10 members forecasting a Fed Funds Rate above 1% by the end of 2015, with 4 members between 1.75% and 2%. There is no way in hell the 5-Year Bond trading with a Yield under what the Fed Funds Rate could be in 2015 by their own Fed Forecasts, (with a highly dovish Fed slant by the way) there is no way this is a safe investment strategy. There is no way in hell this bond is any good this time next year with the current price and yield.

 

 

 

But remember this is a 5–Year Bond, so theoretically an investor is locking up the money for 5 years, and even based on the Fed`s own forecasts for Rate Hikes for 2017 (only 3 years from now) 15 Fed Members forecasts are all above 3% for the Fed Funds Rate. Remember this is for the Fed Funds Rate, and doesn`t even include an inflation forward looking component added to every bond, or just call it a risk premium that inflation could spike during the duration of this bond. By the way, Inflation is currently running at 1.6% by the government models. 

 

Negative Real Rates - Doesn`t apply with ZIRP Financing

 

In essence current bond holders have a negative real rate, the only way they make this risky trade is if they can borrow at essentially zero percent borrowing costs, use insane leverage, and ‘speculate’ on the low borrowing cost to bond yield Delta and also benefit from price appreciation by pushing the bond prices up as far as they can. I am sure this is the kind of risky behavior the Fed wants to encourage with their ZIRP program versus promoting sound long-term investment decisions that aren`t a threat to the financial stability of the system. Remember all these bond purchases that are only viable in a ZIRP Environment will have to be unwound – this unwinding is the systemic risk that the Fed has created! This is where the Unintended Consequences of ZIRP come back to bite the Federal Reserve. They cannot provide ZIRP with no restrictions and expect investors to make rational sound investment decisions, the cheaper the liquidity and the more available the liquidity is in direct correlation with the ‘riskiness’ of the investment choices.

 

Read More >>> Central Banks Biggest Concern Should Be Market Stability

 

Do These Bond Speculators ever Plug These Trades into a 5-Year Model

 

 

Literally the 5-Year Bond has to be one of the ill-advised investments in the history of stupid investments by speculators who bought this bond the past week. There is no way in hell this is sound risk reward investing, it isn`t even sound speculating. It is the most idiotic place one could store one`s money, and is indicative of what James Bullard and many see as major problems ahead for these speculators in the bond market induced by ZIRP borrowing costs. These investors will literally pick up pennies in front of a massive steamroller, more money has been lost chasing yield in the history of financial markets than any other mainstream trading strategy. It is amazing how risky and stupid speculators can be when their gains are rewarded by profits and fat bonuses and theirs losses are subsidized by bank bailouts! 

Market Participants May Say they are onboard for June 2015 Rate Hikes, However they haven`t come to terms with this Reality given the positions they are putting on, and the length of time required to unwind said positions without causing major market dislocations

 

I think the Fed needs to get out their calculator and start realizing just how off-sides the mainstream bond market is in ‘actual terms’ to their own forecasts for rate hikes, calculate the amount of losses ahead for anyone holding a 5-Year Bond with a yield of 1.53% today, with a conservative Fed Funds Rate of just 3% during this 5 year period. Moreover, guess who are holding a lot of these bonds, financial institutions, namely banks. Is the Federal Reserve prepared to bail out these banks or buy these bonds all over again with an already stretched 4.5 Trillion Dollar Balance Sheet? 

 

Janet Yellen Failing to do the kind of ‘Prudential Regulation’ that she advocates

 

This is the kind of “Prudential Regulation” that Janet Yellen should be doing right now in assessing over the top risk taking due to zero percent cheap money slushing around the banking sector. This has encouraged all kinds of “imprudent risk-taking” by investors, and the Fed better wake up to the actual numbers we are talking about here, especially once you calculate the interconnectedness of financial assets, and the fact that many of these bonds are used as leverage and collateral for other investments.

 

The Federal Reserve is seriously asleep at the wheel to the massive bubble building in what is supposed to be a conservative market, but losses are losses, just start doing the math Janet Yellen. The Bond Market is in a massive bubble even by your own conservative forecasts, she better start doing some “Prudential Regulating” and developing a real hawkish tone just to get some of these overzealous speculators to start unwinding these massive positions. Forget the stock market, commodities, or Social Media Stocks they can go up or down; no real threat to the financial system, but the size of the bond market, and the sheer bubble that exists, is the real threat to financial stability of the entire system. 

 

Bond Haircuts & Risk Modeling

 

 

Just look at the 5-Year Bond and tell me that price and yield makes any sense, (just do the math it doesn`t add up) this is symptomatic of the bond market in general, there is no way that any of those 10-Year European Bonds are any good during this duration of time, and many banks have these toxic assets on their books right now because of global ZIRP incentives. 

 

 

The difference between 2007 and today is these were largely sub-prime loans and overvalued real estate mortgages in the financial crisis of 2007/08; but this is the entire global bond market from Spain and Greece to the United States 5-Year Bond with rates rising by everyone`s standards in 8 months’ time by the Federal Reserve. There is no capacity in the ECB or the US Federal Reserve to buy all these toxic and deteriorating by the minute bond assets on banks` balance sheets. This time the only option is major haircuts by bond holders, shoot even the best house on the block in the United States has a 5-Year Bond that from a price and yield perspective is going to cause major losses for these investors going forward! 

 

© EconMatters All Rights Reserved | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscribe | Kindle

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 10/12/2014 - 11:38 | 5320687 farmboy
farmboy's picture

I respect this view of Econ but I totally disagree. From a logical/economical point he is right but if the turmoil in stocks continues bonds will rise no matter what. The other is the assumption that short term rates will rise. Look at Japan you have still 14 years to go with short term rates going nowhere. Rising rates will kill stocks/bonds/Real estate/ Banks/the economy/Government/Geopolitical ambitions. No we will see QE for ever until it blows up. Remember this is not a market anymore but a game were participants have to jump from one melting icepad to another until no ice is left anymore.

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 07:06 | 5320020 Kina
Kina's picture

Exactly... 0.49% fee on this one.... so they pick up a nice little bit for not much work.

 

Then again..i have cash invested in a number of Aussie banks...and need to diversify from them in some way. (apart from gold and silver which I already have )

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 06:50 | 5320010 Midnight Hour
Midnight Hour's picture

Does anyone have an idea when QE5 will start? Will it be this year or next year?

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 11:44 | 5320711 Mike in GA
Mike in GA's picture

Tuesday, Oct 14th, 8:30am, as per the usual except even more to offset the increasing emergence of truth and reality.  Can't have these (places formerly known as markets) unmolested

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 05:00 | 5319972 Kina
Kina's picture

I have my Australian Superannuation account in the option called: Capital Guaranteed.

What they haven't told me, and I have asked, (still waiting),  is if any of their investing is in foreign entities.....

 

And Guarantees?.....only good as they TPTB willingness to make an entity honour them...and the enity itself doesn't go bankrupt/insolvent.

But the options...are limited 

 

Capital Guaranteed.....This option invests in fixed interest and cash. It’s designed for members who want to protect their capital with a garantee*.

* The Capital Guaranteed option invests through a life office capital guaranteed statutory fund under a policy issued by AMP. The terms of this policy have the effect that the
original capital amount invested cannot reduce due to poor investment returns. This option uses reserves to smooth out investment returns and protect member’s capital.
Returns may be lower than bank bills if the investments perform poorly

 

 

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 05:56 | 5319995 Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

Dear Kina,

Australian super is a farce and a mechanism for making banks, brokers and advisers rich. Just ask yourself this......if you want a capital guaranteed fund then why can't your super fund open an account for you with just any of the four big banks?

The answer is: how can they charge a management and performance fee just for opening an account for you?

The answer is "they can't" therefore they don't open such an account for you.

 

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 02:07 | 5319894 OpenThePodBayDoorHAL
OpenThePodBayDoorHAL's picture

Also depends whether you think $4.5 trillion is "stretched", one of the Fed's regional governors said he "saw no problem with $6 or even $9 trillion..."

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 00:58 | 5319849 4shzl
4shzl's picture

"10 Year Treasury Short Best Place to be Remainder of 2014"

 Uh-huh.  And bent over your bunk with your pants around your ankles is the best place to be if you want to make new friends on your cell block.


Sat, 10/11/2014 - 22:50 | 5319650 himaroid
himaroid's picture

I really dig your aspiration, your enthusiasm, your bogus naivete, your losing cause. 

I have not yet, quite nailed down your intriuging self yet.

 So at the very least, you have that going for you.

Sat, 10/11/2014 - 22:10 | 5319561 The Most Intere...
The Most Interesting Frog in the World's picture

You base your decisions on Fed forecasts.  Me, not so much.

Sat, 10/11/2014 - 21:58 | 5319529 Yancey Ward
Yancey Ward's picture

I agree the 5Y is a lousy investment given just the inflation rate.  However, I don't think it completely silly to think the Fed forecasts about what they are going to do in 2015-2017 with the short rate is a steaming pile of dogshit.  I think there are a lot of people calling that a bluff.  I think they are probably right, though I do think the Fed will try to lift rates next year just so that they can say they tried to act on their forward bullshit guidance.

Sat, 10/11/2014 - 21:06 | 5319389 max2205
max2205's picture

If it doesn't make sense then it's the right move

2009 - 2014 is 6 years.....they be pushing the trend

Sat, 10/11/2014 - 20:20 | 5319279 I Write Code
I Write Code's picture

 

Inflation is currently running at 1.6% by the government models. 

Right, and Kate Upton is under my desk, polishing my toenails.

But I don't really see why the 5-year bond should be so much worse an investment than a ten or thirty year, I don't think we're likely to see the short end go up and the long end stay so low.

Sat, 10/11/2014 - 19:31 | 5319148 AdvancingTime
AdvancingTime's picture

Fantastic article, five years is forever and a day in this economic environment and more than enough time to get scalped.

Recently released minutes from the last Federal Reserve meeting confirmed growing concern about the pressure a stronger dollar is putting on other currencies around the world. Bottom-line is other currencies are under assault because both economies are weak and countries are buried in debt they can never repay at real market interest rates. When investors become unwilling to buy the bonds of heavily indebted nations causing the bond bubble to burst the values of currencies in those countries will tumble.

While there are not many Bond Vigilantes there are a slew of  Currency Vigilantes and they are ready to make their presence known. Recent weakness in the value of the Yen, Pound, and Euro must not go unnoticed. The Currency Vigilantes are acutely aware of when a currency is overvalued or ready to be re-pegged and pounce on the weak currency to tear it apart. The article below questions just how stable the currency markets really are and may be a signal that currency trading is about to get very wild. Please note, this may also be sending a signal that the whole system is unstable and the stock market is about to drop like a stone.

Many people are looking for a "deflationary crash" and it is possible or we may see money shift from bubble to bubble. I have pondered the possibility that what we have been going through is the "major deflationary period." More and more often we seen Central Bankers forced to pull rabbits out of their hats. When we stand on the abyss central bankers will be forced to print so much worthless paper the money it will act as a cushion to our fall but not change the reality. Before you discount this possibility that we will move directly into the final stage consider that hyperinflation paves an easier transition to a replacement currency and a reset of the system.

 http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2014/10/fed-concerned-that-stong-dollar.h...

 

Sat, 10/11/2014 - 22:51 | 5319655 himaroid
himaroid's picture

Son, the illusion of control will be long long long gone before your imagined progression. Prepare accordingly.

Sun, 10/12/2014 - 08:02 | 5320059 AdvancingTime
AdvancingTime's picture

Control is an interesting word. I contend that the powers to be "control an out of "control" situation.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!