This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
George Soros Slams Putin, Warns Of "Existential Threat" From Russia, Demands $20 Billion From IMF In "Russia War Effort"
If even George Soros is getting concerned and writing Op-Eds, then Putin must be truly winning.

Here are the highlights from what the Open Society founder has to say about the "existential" Russian threat in a just released Op-Ed:
Europe is facing a challenge from Russia to its very existence. Neither the European leaders nor their citizens are fully aware of this challenge or know how best to deal with it. I attribute this mainly to the fact that the European Union in general and the eurozone in particular lost their way after the financial crisis of 2008.
Getting warmer:
[Europe] fails to recognize that the Russian attack on Ukraine is indirectly an attack on the European Union and its principles of governance. It ought to be evident that it is inappropriate for a country, or association of countries, at war to pursue a policy of fiscal austerity as the European Union continues to do.
Even warmer:
All available resources ought to be put to work in the war effort even if that involves running up budget deficits
And hot, hot, hot:
[IMF] should provide an immediate cash injection of at least $20 billion, with a promise of more when needed. Ukraine’s partners should provide additional financing conditional on implementation of the IMF-supported program, at their own risk, in line with standard practice.
And there it is: the Russian "existential" war threat is, to Soros, nothing but an excuse to end the whole (f)austerity experiment (just don't show Soros Europe's latest record high debt load), and to return to its drunken sailor spending ways.
Ironically, this is precisely what we said would happen, only the globalist neo-cons were hoping the Ukraine civil war would become an all out war between Russia and Ukraine, thus unleashing the "spend your way to prosperity" Soroses of the world. For now, this plan has failed which is why ISIS was brought into the picture.
But it never hurts to try, eh George. And the one thing that is not mentioned is that the people who would gain the most from this latest IMF spending spree would be, you guessed it, billionaires like George Soros of course
* * *
From George Soros, first posted in the New York Reviews Of Books
Wake Up, Europe
Europe is facing a challenge from Russia to its very existence. Neither the European leaders nor their citizens are fully aware of this challenge or know how best to deal with it. I attribute this mainly to the fact that the European Union in general and the eurozone in particular lost their way after the financial crisis of 2008.
The fiscal rules that currently prevail in Europe have aroused a lot of popular resentment. Anti-Europe parties captured nearly 30 percent of the seats in the latest elections for the European Parliament but they had no realistic alternative to the EU to point to until recently. Now Russia is presenting an alternative that poses a fundamental challenge to the values and principles on which the European Union was originally founded. It is based on the use of force that manifests itself in repression at home and aggression abroad, as opposed to the rule of law. What is shocking is that Vladimir Putin’s Russia has proved to be in some ways superior to the European Union—more flexible and constantly springing surprises. That has given it a tactical advantage, at least in the near term.
Europe and the United States—each for its own reasons—are determined to avoid any direct military confrontation with Russia. Russia is taking advantage of their reluctance. Violating its treaty obligations, Russia has annexed Crimea and established separatist enclaves in eastern Ukraine. In August, when the recently installed government in Kiev threatened to win the low-level war in eastern Ukraine against separatist forces backed by Russia, President Putin invaded Ukraine with regular armed forces in violation of the Russian law that exempts conscripts from foreign service without their consent.
In seventy-two hours these forces destroyed several hundred of Ukraine’s armored vehicles, a substantial portion of its fighting force. According to General Wesley Clark, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander for Europe, the Russians used multiple launch rocket systems armed with cluster munitions and thermobaric warheads (an even more inhumane weapon that ought to be outlawed) with devastating effect.* The local militia from the Ukrainian city of Dnepropetrovsk suffered the brunt of the losses because they were communicating by cell phones and could thus easily be located and targeted by the Russians. President Putin has, so far, abided by a cease-fire agreement he concluded with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on September 5, but Putin retains the choice to continue the cease-fire as long as he finds it advantageous or to resume a full-scale assault.
In September, President Poroshenko visited Washington where he received an enthusiastic welcome from a joint session of Congress. He asked for “both lethal and nonlethal” defensive weapons in his speech. However, President Obama refused his request for Javelin hand-held missiles that could be used against advancing tanks. Poroshenko was given radar, but what use is it without missiles? European countries are equally reluctant to provide military assistance to Ukraine, fearing Russian retaliation. The Washington visit gave President Poroshenko a façade of support with little substance behind it.
Equally disturbing has been the determination of official international leaders to withhold new financial commitments to Ukraine until after the October 26 election there (which will take place just after this issue goes to press). This has led to an avoidable pressure on Ukrainian currency reserves and raised the specter of a full-blown financial crisis in the country.
There is now pressure from donors, whether in Europe or the US, to “bail in” the bondholders of Ukrainian sovereign debt, i.e., for bondholders to take losses on their investments as a precondition for further official assistance to Ukraine that would put more taxpayers’ money at risk. That would be an egregious error. The Ukrainian government strenuously opposes the proposal because it would put Ukraine into a technical default that would make it practically impossible for the private sector to refinance its debt. Bailing in private creditors would save very little money and it would make Ukraine entirely dependent on the official donors.
To complicate matters, Russia is simultaneously dangling carrots and wielding sticks. It is offering—but failing to sign—a deal for gas supplies that would take care of Ukraine’s needs for the winter. At the same time Russia is trying to prevent the delivery of gas that Ukraine secured from the European market through Slovakia. Similarly, Russia is negotiating for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to monitor the borders while continuing to attack the Donetsk airport and the port city of Mariupol.
It is easy to foresee what lies ahead. Putin will await the results of the elections on October 26 and then offer Poroshenko the gas and other benefits he has been dangling on condition that he appoint a prime minister acceptable to Putin. That would exclude anybody associated with the victory of the forces that brought down the Viktor Yanukovych government by resisting it for months on the Maidan—Independence Square. I consider it highly unlikely that Poroshenko would accept such an offer. If he did, he would be disowned by the defenders of the Maidan; the resistance forces would then be revived.
Putin may then revert to the smaller victory that would still be within his reach: he could open by force a land route from Russia to Crimea and Transnistria before winter. Alternatively, he could simply sit back and await the economic and financial collapse of Ukraine. I suspect that he may be holding out the prospect of a grand bargain in which Russia would help the United States against ISIS—for instance by not supplying to Syria the S300 missiles it has promised, thus in effect preserving US air domination—and Russia would be allowed to have its way in the “near abroad,” as many of the nations adjoining Russia are called. What is worse, President Obama may accept such a deal.
That would be a tragic mistake, with far-reaching geopolitical consequences. Without underestimating the threat from ISIS, I would argue that preserving the independence of Ukraine should take precedence; without it, even the alliance against ISIS would fall apart. The collapse of Ukraine would be a tremendous loss for NATO, the European Union, and the United States. A victorious Russia would become much more influential within the EU and pose a potent threat to the Baltic states with their large ethnic Russian populations. Instead of supporting Ukraine, NATO would have to defend itself on its own soil. This would expose both the EU and the US to the danger they have been so eager to avoid: a direct military confrontation with Russia. The European Union would become even more divided and ungovernable. Why should the US and other NATO nations allow this to happen?
The argument that has prevailed in both Europe and the United States is that Putin is no Hitler; by giving him everything he can reasonably ask for, he can be prevented from resorting to further use of force. In the meantime, the sanctions against Russia—which include, for example, restrictions on business transactions, finance, and trade—will have their effect and in the long run Russia will have to retreat in order to earn some relief from them.
These are false hopes derived from a false argument with no factual evidence to support it. Putin has repeatedly resorted to force and he is liable to do so again unless he faces strong resistance. Even if it is possible that the hypothesis could turn out to be valid, it is extremely irresponsible not to prepare a Plan B.
There are two counterarguments that are less obvious but even more important. First, Western authorities have ignored the importance of what I call the “new Ukraine” that was born in the successful resistance on the Maidan. Many officials with a history of dealing with Ukraine have difficulty adjusting to the revolutionary change that has taken place there. The recently signed Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine was originally negotiated with the Yanukovych government. This detailed road map now needs adjustment to a totally different situation. For instance, the road map calls for the gradual replacement and retraining of the judiciary over five years whereas the public is clamoring for immediate and radical renewal. As the new mayor of Kiev, Vitali Klitschko, put it, “If you put fresh cucumbers into a barrel of pickles, they will soon turn into pickles.”
Contrary to some widely circulated accounts, the resistance on the Maidan was led by the cream of civil society: young people, many of whom had studied abroad and refused to join either government or business on their return because they found both of them repugnant. (Nationalists and anti-Semitic extremists made up only a minority of the anti-Yanukovych protesters.) They are the leaders of the new Ukraine and they are adamantly opposed to a return of the “old Ukraine,” with its endemic corruption and ineffective government.
The new Ukraine has to contend with Russian aggression, bureaucratic resistance both at home and abroad, and confusion in the general population. Surprisingly, it has the support of many oligarchs, President Poroshenko foremost among them, and the population at large. There are of course profound differences in history, language, and outlook between the eastern and western parts of the country, but Ukraine is more united and more European-minded than ever before. That unity, however, is extremely fragile.
The new Ukraine has remained largely unrecognized because it took time before it could make its influence felt. It had practically no security forces at its disposal when it was born. The security forces of the old Ukraine were actively engaged in suppressing the Maidan rebellion and they were disoriented this summer when they had to take orders from a government formed by the supporters of the rebellion. No wonder that the new government was at first unable to put up an effective resistance to the establishment of the separatist enclaves in eastern Ukraine. It is all the more remarkable that President Poroshenko was able, within a few months of his election, to mount an attack that threatened to reclaim those enclaves.
To appreciate the merits of the new Ukraine you need to have had some personal experience with it. I can speak from personal experience although I must also confess to a bias in its favor. I established a foundation in Ukraine in 1990 even before the country became independent. Its board and staff are composed entirely of Ukrainians and it has deep roots in civil society. I visited the country often, especially in the early years, but not between 2004 and early 2014, when I returned to witness the birth of the new Ukraine.
I was immediately impressed by the tremendous improvement in maturity and expertise during that time both in my foundation and in civil society at large. Currently, civic and political engagement is probably higher than anywhere else in Europe. People have proven their willingness to sacrifice their lives for their country. These are the hidden strengths of the new Ukraine that have been overlooked by the West.
The other deficiency of the current European attitude toward Ukraine is that it fails to recognize that the Russian attack on Ukraine is indirectly an attack on the European Union and its principles of governance. It ought to be evident that it is inappropriate for a country, or association of countries, at war to pursue a policy of fiscal austerity as the European Union continues to do. All available resources ought to be put to work in the war effort even if that involves running up budget deficits. The fragility of the new Ukraine makes the ambivalence of the West all the more perilous. Not only the survival of the new Ukraine but the future of NATO and the European Union itself is at risk. In the absence of unified resistance it is unrealistic to expect that Putin will stop pushing beyond Ukraine when the division of Europe and its domination by Russia is in sight.
Having identified some of the shortcomings of the current approach, I will try to spell out the course that Europe ought to follow. Sanctions against Russia are necessary but they are a necessary evil. They have a depressive effect not only on Russia but also on the European economies, including Germany. This aggravates the recessionary and deflationary forces that are already at work. By contrast, assisting Ukraine in defending itself against Russian aggression would have a stimulative effect not only on Ukraine but also on Europe. That is the principle that ought to guide European assistance to Ukraine.
Germany, as the main advocate of fiscal austerity, needs to understand the internal contradiction involved. Chancellor Angela Merkel has behaved as a true European with regard to the threat posed by Russia. She has been the foremost advocate of sanctions on Russia, and she has been more willing to defy German public opinion and business interests on this than on any other issue. Only after the Malaysian civilian airliner was shot down in July did German public opinion catch up with her. Yet on fiscal austerity she has recently reaffirmed her allegiance to the orthodoxy of the Bundesbank—probably in response to the electoral inroads made by the Alternative for Germany, the anti-euro party. She does not seem to realize how inconsistent that is. She ought to be even more committed to helping Ukraine than to imposing sanctions on Russia.
The new Ukraine has the political will both to defend Europe against Russian aggression and to engage in radical structural reforms. To preserve and reinforce that will, Ukraine needs to receive adequate assistance from its supporters. Without it, the results will be disappointing and hope will turn into despair. Disenchantment already started to set in after Ukraine suffered a military defeat and did not receive the weapons it needs to defend itself.
It is high time for the members of the European Union to wake up and behave as countries indirectly at war. They are better off helping Ukraine to defend itself than having to fight for themselves. One way or another, the internal contradiction between being at war and remaining committed to fiscal austerity has to be eliminated. Where there is a will, there is a way.
Let me be specific. In its last progress report, issued in early September, the IMF estimated that in a worst-case scenario Ukraine would need additional support of $19 billion. Conditions have deteriorated further since then. After the Ukrainian elections the IMF will need to reassess its baseline forecast in consultation with the Ukrainian government. It should provide an immediate cash injection of at least $20 billion, with a promise of more when needed. Ukraine’s partners should provide additional financing conditional on implementation of the IMF-supported program, at their own risk, in line with standard practice.
The spending of borrowed funds is controlled by the agreement between the IMF and the Ukrainian government. Four billion dollars would go to make up the shortfall in Ukrainian payments to date; $2 billion would be assigned to repairing the coal mines in eastern Ukraine that remain under the control of the central government; and $2 billion would be earmarked for the purchase of additional gas for the winter. The rest would replenish the currency reserves of the central bank.
The new assistance package would include a debt exchange that would transform Ukraine’s hard currency Eurobond debt (which totals almost $18 billion) into long-term, less risky bonds. This would lighten Ukraine’s debt burden and bring down its risk premium. By participating in the exchange, bondholders would agree to accept a lower interest rate and wait longer to get their money back. The exchange would be voluntary and market-based so that it could not be mischaracterized as a default. Bondholders would participate willingly because the new long-term bonds would be guaranteed—but only partially—by the US or Europe, much as the US helped Latin America emerge from its debt crisis in the 1980s with so-called Brady bonds (named for US Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady).
Such an exchange would have a few important benefits. One is that, over the next two or three critical years, the government could use considerably less of its scarce hard currency reserves to pay off bondholders. The money could be used for other urgent needs.
By trimming Ukraine debt payments in the next few years, the exchange would also reduce the chance of a sovereign default, discouraging capital flight and arresting the incipient run on the banks. This would make it easier to persuade owners of Ukraine’s banks (many of them foreign) to inject urgently needed new capital into them. The banks desperately need bigger capital cushions if Ukraine is to avoid a full-blown banking crisis, but shareholders know that a debt crisis could cause a banking crisis that wipes out their equity.
Finally, Ukraine would keep bondholders engaged rather than watch them cash out at 100 cents on the dollar as existing debt comes due in the next few years. This would make it easier for Ukraine to reenter the international bond markets once the crisis has passed. Under the current conditions it would be more practical and cost-efficient for the US and Europe not to use their own credit directly to guarantee part of Ukraine’s debt, but to employ intermediaries such as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development or the World Bank and its subsidiaries.
The Ukrainian state-owned company Naftogaz is a black hole in the budget and a major source of corruption. Naftogaz currently sells gas to households for $47 per trillion cubic meters (TCM), for which it pays $380 per TCM. At present people cannot control the temperature in their apartments. A radical restructuring of Naftogaz’s entire system could reduce household consumption at least by half and totally eliminate Ukraine’s dependence on Russia for gas. That would involve charging households the market price for gas. The first step would be to install meters in apartments and the second to distribute a cash subsidy to needy households.
The will to make these reforms is strong both in the new management and in the incoming government but the task is extremely complicated (how do you define who is needy?) and the expertise is inadequate. The World Bank and its subsidiaries could sponsor a project development team that would bring together international and domestic experts to convert the existing political will into bankable projects. The initial cost would exceed $10 billion but it could be financed by project bonds issued by the European Investment Bank and it would produce very high returns.
It is also high time for the European Union to take a critical look at itself. There must be something wrong with the EU if Putin’s Russia can be so successful even in the short term. The bureaucracy of the EU no longer has a monopoly of power and it has little to be proud of. It should learn to be more united, flexible, and efficient. And Europeans themselves need to take a close look at the new Ukraine. That could help them recapture the original spirit that led to the creation of the European Union. The European Union would save itself by saving Ukraine.
—October 23, 2014
- 75043 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


Thursday morning's alright for fighting.
Stomp a mudhole in his ass Putin.
Fuck George Soros and the Barroso he rode in on.
Edit - Oh and Fuck the EU too. Soros is the right though. Putin is the world's best hope of ridding ourselves of this fiscal blackhole in Brussels. Its one of the reasons I have a total man crush on Putin. He can wipe out the EU.
There was Thin Lizzy...
And there is Thick Lizzy...
Thick, wrinkled Lizzy....
Thick Wrinkled Lizzy wants a big Ruski Fly....
A Venus fly trap he is not...
When do deranged Lizzy's hit retirement age?
Soros assisted Nazi’s in WWII and he has been helping Nazis in Ukraine.
http://www.infowars.com/soros-admits-responsibility-for-coup-and-mass-murder-in-ukraine/
You are known by the company you keep (or support).
In my Webster's under "scum-bag" is his picture
A Jew wants war??? Say it ain't so!
Russia is threatenign us, gimme $20 billion dollahhhs, quick!!!
Atleast its better than, Gimme $20 billion dollars or I'll shoot myself!
Fuck you Soros... You're the reason for this Ukriane mess in the first place...
TL;DR, will do later, i just wanted to say "DIE ALREADY YOU OLD SACK OF MEAT"
“decaying meat”
Every time these Nazi's go fucking crazy from pharma meth and brain worms, they head off to russia...
It's a built-in self-correction mechanism.
Kinda like lemmings and cliffs.
Don't worry, Russia will grind these idiots into mulch just like they always do...
Maybe Putin can arrange a little take-off accident with a snow plow on Mr. Sorros' next flight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuXe0uoPcLs
Pretty good war flick.
This should bring back some memories for Curious George.
I like how it ends well for the Nazi's.
A German Movie too...
Tyler
"More taxpayer money to make me a winner!"
What a fucking douchebag.
LMAO!
Cause Putin can BUY Soros!
Hmmmm...a rallying call for tribal unity, the cocksuckers maus be worried.
With a Federal debt of 13.4% of GDP, Russia is making everyone look bad. Existential threat to the keynesians.
Overall, looks like there must be a gold shortage problem at the LBMA and Soros and his buds need some cover.
War works for that.
Why these scums don't die!!
If plane crashed in Ukraine; army of “new state” moved near Bagdad; oil prices dropped; nuclear-powered boat DIS-covered; and oil collaborator snow-plowed (did any get missed?) did not work… so sending out smoke to “rally unity” ? Is that the best they could do, real-ly?
I'd heard Putin 'bid' 21 Billion for Soros head.
Do we have another bid? Going once, going twice....
I realize this isn't adding much to the discussion, but isn't Soros starting to look more and more like one of those two grumpy guys on The Muppets?
He's a Rothschild Zionist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNIcAcrvi2M
It is insulting to us muppets of including him.
Well, they say a fish rots from the head down. Sophical conclusion is that they don't have a head.
The apex parasites are worried.
They are scared to death of losing control.
maybe that's why it feels like, as soon as these old 70-80+ year old billionaires die, the world is going to be a much better place.
i'm hollering at you too, Buffett...
Murdoch..
Sometimes, civilization progresses one funeral at a time.
This would be one of those cases.
Better for the world all around should the Oligarchs take each other out.
I'd like to see their faces on a deck of cards.
George Soros, Ace of Spades. The death card.
The World would be a much better place without Soros. The countdown has started. Tick-tock...
I don't know what I find more shocking:
That the Jews are doing what they have been best known for 3000 years in all cultures and times, or the INCREDIBLE STUPIDITY of today's gentiles that probably also will applaude this newest typical Jewish lying, war- and hate mongering, this Chutzpah!
sometimes chutzpah is earned. You have to admire the historical revision and whitewash, the hyperfocus on Jewish sufferng, the use of 'anti-Semite' to squelch criticism of obvous, unequivocal war crimes - and the ability to basically fabricate evidence to lie the US into war on Iraq - for Israel - and to have the Jewishness and Zionism of "the neocons" remain wholly undiscussed in the broader, heavily Jewish/Zionist controlled news and entertainment media.
Masters of Deception by Zander C. FuerzaThe number one thng helping the status quo is legitimate anti-Semitism.
A counter-Semitism is needed...one that is simply about facts, and fairness, and the analysis of power.
Agreed on all points.
The Tea Party has the biggest neocons of all, 86% view Israel favorably:
http://www.jewishjournal.com/rosnersdomain/item/the_tea_party_and_israel...
The Tea Party is a concentrated dose of the present Republican Platform, not an alternative. The media sure has packaged it up differently though, don't they?
There is no "tea party". If there ever was one, its been captured.
The real thing was beautiful while it lasted, before the psychopaths hijacked it.
The most fascinating thing about this treatise by Mr. Soros is that he apparently BELIEVES at least some of these lies. THAT, not the note itself, should make everyone nervous. These people seem truly overwhelmed by their own hubris!
The Talmud not only allows Jews (NOT Judeans) to lie to the Goyim to achieve their ends, it commands it. It also states that the life of one Jew is worth one thousand goyim lives.
FYI. I'm not antisemitic, because these scum aren't Semitic people.
They are usurpers, and the children of their father Satan.
You mean to tell me those people on the ballot that claim to be just like us might be deceivers????
UNHEARD OF!!!
Short Russia George?
I'd rather short "George" at this time. My bet is on the Russians...
Please check out commonsenseshow.com. Deagle, who is in bed with Zapata Oil/Bush nazis and is "partnered" with NSA, NATO, OECD, FSOZ (Russians), Stratfor, World Bank, UN, projects that the US population will be 69 million in 2025. Read that over and over.
That's because the other 300 million will be on vacation. The French Riviera, Mount Olympus, Saturn ring voyages, and interstellar travel to Nubiru where our hoarded gold can literally buy planets.
Or maybe really send a message with a little dioxin or polonium 210.
"The Phony Litvinenko Murder" William Dunkerley
Media dumb you down much?
look definition of critical thinking
Doesn't matter. Soros deserves some Po210.
Mr. Soros money at work:
http://www.anna-news.info/node/24161
Soros wants a Federalized Europe with centralized control over 400 million people. what better way than to create a common enemy to unite over? I am mostly convinced that Putin wants the same end. ll of these fucking totalitarians want as few Nations as possible. Small, independent nations are an annoyance and a distraction to their big picture which is to own and control your ass.
and they don't even make my ass look better
Fuck you, Soros!
Somebody who finances color revolutions like the one in Serbia is the last person who should talk about Russian aggression.
Is an "existential threat" sort of like the "paradoxical thingy" that Freeden describes when he says if we stop Eboleans from coming into the country, it will spread quicker in our country...?
Is paradoxical like existential thing ? Are they like an "economic rekovery" ...
... meaning they don't exist.
Basically. Then he wants the region cleared of all bloodlines other than his bogus bloodline.
"Without underestimating the threat from ISIS, I would argue that preserving the independence of Ukraine should take precedence"
...because ISIS will still sell us fuel
Obama was giving Soros a BJ under the table while he was writing this. That's why he could not stop writing. Soros, do us all a favor and go look for your grave site so maybe Ukraine can survive you evil bastards.
Soros is saying this now as he wants to place his big Ruble calls
He needs more formaldehyde.
Putin must allow more pedophile ogre Jews to thrive in his Country OR ELSE!
Putin won't let the ethno-Bolsheviks rape Russia again and murder 40 million people. Oye, it's a nudder holocau$t I tells ya, and remember, I vuss gassed 3, no no, 6 times.
we cannot allow another spielberg hollow cause.
SIX MILLION JEWS 1915-1938 HDhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk
Hooda thunk?
Conspiracy.
@tony wilson
The First HolocaustJewish Fund Raising Campaigns
with Holocaust Claims
During and After World War One
http://vho.org/GB/Books/tfh/
Here's the late Christopher Hitchens* on Charlie Rose in 1996, defending Holocaust denier David Irving
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dWxklSFPEA (9'27") = Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEt1ldY6hFw (8'01") = Part 2
Author of the NY Times Bestseller, God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything,
Per Wiki, "(Early Life and Education)... His mother was Jewish, and kept that fact a secret. It wasn't until late 1987 that Hitchens learned he was Jewish by birth (though he became a lifelong atheist)."
Here's a site that has actual Death Certificates from Auschwitz, and comes from Russian sources, i.e. Russia took them during their liberation of Auschwitz and was given to the West in the 1990s.
http://cleveland.indymedia.org/uploads/2007/03/a.htm
http://cleveland.indymedia.org/uploads/2007/03/b.htm
http://cleveland.indymedia.org/uploads/2007/03/c.htm
…
If you drop the text into Excel, use the Text-to-Columns feature, you can do all sorts of Excel games: sort by any column, sum up the deaths by town, faith, etc. Note however this is a partial list, as not all deaths are included. I know this for fact, because one of our family members is listed (grandfather), the other (grandmother) is not.
After having done the said Excel games, I was amazed that so many Christians -- and especially Catholics -- were killed. More Catholics died than Jews. That astounded me. Especially since Himmler and Hitler were "Catholic" themselves. Funny how you don't hear about the CHRISTIAN or CATHOLIC HOLOCAUST. Or the RUSSIAN HOLOCAUST, given that 14 Million Russians lost their lives to Nazi Germany.
Clearly our Western MSM has been spreading BS, Propaganda and downright lies for almost a Century. Funny how all sorts of things went to hell in the world, after the Fed was established in Dec. 1913. The more I read and research, the more I see the slimy hand print of Rothschild-funded Global Zionism in the halls fo Wealth, Power and Influence. The global banksters have wrapped their bankster scams around a Religion of a People, and hijacked it for their own purposes.
Six Million Christian Americans....bankrupted and forced to watch Hollywood movies strapped to a chair.....oh the humanity.
Soro's you dirty ass old war mongering cheesepope! Understand there is a guaranteed spot in hell for you, and the Satan from South Park the movie will be waiting for you.....ungreased hopefully!
He doesn't care. He'll pay them off and they'll end up working for him.
Iraq was about Israel, not oil.
Hey, let's you and him fight!
As usual, cross the interests of the tribe and then there's war or "revolutions":
Indeed. Alice in Wonderland = Michael "underwear bomber"* Chertoff. Talmudist, dual citizen... former head of the DHS.
*"Working for the CIA." Uh huh. The Saudis and the troupe of clowns over at the CIA are probably just a limited hangout, sort of like the pet scape goat of 911 that was never even used. That's a lot of freedumb. Wow. Anyway, I wonder who is in charge of making sure these patsies don't drool on themselvs. "Escorted by a well dressed man." No shit.
Is the CIA ever going to get it together and turn on Jews like Rapiscan Inc. Chertoff? Sayanim? It's always stand with Israel first.... but blame the goyim golem of Team America, World Ponzi Police first. Can anyone get it together? Perhaps form a secret society like Masons and wow each other with ooga booga if you have to in order to mimic the subconscious ethnic networking of those that perceive themselves as members of The Tribe above all tribes/goyim. Because the theatrical production of this whole shit show has been ridiculous ever since 911 and their utterly bungled athrax attacks. And it's really not clear how long everyone else around the world is going to put up with it. Russia is already, to some degree, moving against it. Apparenlty they have the Orthodox Church as some semblance of an "antisemitic" spiritual backbone in the background, etc. Putin is one man, probably corrupt, there have to be others there also that are willing to fight, for whatever reason. (Probably all on the sanctions list, huh?)
CIA, CIA.. anyone home? What are you guys going to be left with, a few free gay rainbows, supposed solar powered ponies for the Pentagon to combat climate change, crusading Christian "witless wonder" Zionists, more "Mission Accomplished" freedumb, Jewish ownership of the mainstream/military industrial media and everything that usually entails as far as the degradation of a culture? Seriously, what is this anymore? What are you even doing? Call up factions in the NSA and get them to spy on Feinstein or all dual citizens?
Shrug. At least America's original Masons got it together and built a civilization. The FBI/CIA/NSA types need to stop watching porn and get it together. If you're really patriotic, then be patriotic for your own nation. The politicians like Chuck "I represent America first." Hagel are not going to do it. They're careerists.
"Careerist" in this context means they have the guy on tape, getting down at the ritual child sacrifice pedophile orgy.
If Russia's your threat, we will offer you debt so your ass will be ours.
I wondered about that, too. In the past he was asked about it and didn't expressed remorse. So why does he get off the hook when the Nazi hunters are looking for the baddies? It's not like he even cares. What's his secret? How does he get a pass from that and still get to meddle into national policy? Who owns him? I don't recall ever hearing him identify himself as American. He's just a nomad with unaccountable money.
His opening line is just priceless narcissist/sociopath at work: "Europe is facing a challenge from Russia to its very existence. Neither the European leaders nor their citizens are fully aware of this challenge or know how best to deal with it."
"......but, I do!"
FUCK YOU, Soros!!! You treasonous, Nazi-collaborating, war criminal, piece of shit!!!
Snow plow time. His face is the runway.
Soros betrays his origins with Zionist Newpeak. In Nazi collaboration, he only continues a long and evil tradition. "Existential" threats can only happen to colonial states, not to those whose inhabitants have lived there forever. Let the reader understand.
It's time to recognize the difference between Jewish people, who are just people like everyone else, and these Rothschild Zionists. This guy says it best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNIcAcrvi2M
@Transformer: Correct!! While some of the Rothschilds syndicate are most likely jewish, there are many other families involved. The Rothschilds syndicate doesn't give a rat's ass about the jewish people.
R & co. were pretty successful at rounding them up & indoctrinating them with their birthright museum tours to accept & defend the indefensible.
Many are sheep just like the great ol' USSA.
Zio's are only part of this madness. Not all.
how do you know Soros is a "Zionist" and if he is a "Zionist" what has that got to do with his fuckery in Ukraine or in the markets or elsewhere?
Sometimes, Zionism has fuck all to do with it and what we're talking about it a Jewiss Power Consensus.
Other times, its just a bunch of rich assholes.
Phallic, consider that Zionism is short-hand for Jewish Spremacy, or as you put it "Jewish Power Consensus".
@Transformer
The historical record and contemporary accounts are replete with examples of the Jewish people, secular or religious, leftist Bolsheviks or controlled oppostition "Neocons", working ONLY for their collective ethnic interests, all while actively undermining and subverting host nations, institutions, and peoples.
"The Culture of Critique"
http://www.amazon.com/The-Culture-Critique-Evolutionary-Twentieth-Centur...
"Jewish Supremacism"
http://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Supremacism-My-Awakening-Question/dp/189279...
Scientists discover gene that predisposes Ashkenazi Jews to schizophrenia Variations of the DNST3 gene make Ashkenazi Jews 40 percent more likely to develop schizophrenia and similar diseases.http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.560128
http://talmudical.blogspot.com/
I'd like to believe this but the problem is I see very very few of those 'ordinary' Jews speak out or do anything to oppose the monsters who lead them or at least who assume that leadership.
Here's a very perceptive blog comment.
I wish ..... that the Jewish-American elite didn’t in fact represent the broader Jewish tribe. If so, then it is the responsibility of the broader Jewish tribe to rein in their destructive, anti-white Jewish cousins. Will it do this, or would it rather blame those who understand the nature of the game, and have the temerity to point out the prominent Jewish role in it? It should also be said that the Jewish poison being fed to whites (and other races, for that matter) doesn’t become any sweeter just because some Jews are idiotic enough to swallow some themselves. http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2013/10/a-message-to-my-friend-josh.html
Monty - I hear you, but consider that the zionist owned and controlled MSM will not go out of its way to bring to your attention Jews who are not with the program. Some who come to mind are Prof. Norman Finkelstein, Rabbi Michael Lehrner, Aaron Russo. I used to work with an Israeli who got out to disassociate as much as possible from the evil. We used to discuss and agree how this will all end ... with a back lash.
CB I agree with you. In fact I have drawn up a list of 'good Jews' and it's quite extensive. However, as per the previous comment there seems to be unity among Jews at the top levels and a total dearth of the 'good Jews' making their presence felt. And the irony of course is that if and when the backlash comes it's the ordinary 'Jew in the street' who'll end up copping it.
Soros is a Luciferian/Satanist. Need to be sure to go after the right people.
The Nazis wouldn't want anything to do with this scumbag. Soros, you need to chill and hook up with your buddy Henry K. who seems to get along quite well with Putin.
Soros is just an old a*****e...
And he's got too many politicians on his payroll, for instance Joschka Fischer, former German foreign minister. All the same mesh poke... just disgusting...
Old George is squealing like a pig getting double fisted in the ass. Something behind the scenes going awfully bad for him I guess. I suppose his NGO shell game was not as effective as he thought it would be.
Exactly, how are those oil longs going? Stirring up war to spike price but someone else sees you... that thar is a big pond. Swim swim
"Silencium est aurum"
Soros is just an old a*****e...
And he's got too many politicians on his payroll, for instance Joschka Fischer, former German foreign minister. All the same mesh poke... just disgusting...
Effing war monger, he is a POS. Soros said "Europe is facing a challenge from Russia to its very existence." Last I checked Europe has attacked russia over and over througout the past two centuries not the other way around. I just don't like this guy.
Just,...just look at that thing.
"When it come to matin' with them toad-lookin' fishes, the Kanakys kind o' balked, but finally they larnt something as put a new face on the matter. Seems that human folks has got a kind a' relation to sech water-beasts - that everything alive come aout o' the water onct an' only needs a little change to go back agin. Them things told the Kanakys that ef they mixed bloods there'd be children as ud look human at fust, but later turn more'n more like the things, till finally they'd take to the water an' jine the main lot o' things daown har. An' this is the important part, young feller - them as turned into fish things an' went into the water wouldn't never die. Them things never died excep' they was kilt violent.
"Wal, Sir, it seems by the time Obed knowed them islanders they was all full o' fish blood from them deep water things. When they got old an' begun to shew it, they was kep' hid until they felt like takin' to the water an' quittin' the place. Some was more teched than others, an' some never did change quite enough to take to the water; but mosily they turned out jest the way them things said. Them as was born more like the things changed arly, but them as was nearly human sometimes stayed on the island till they was past seventy, though they'd usually go daown under for trial trips afore that. Folks as had took to the water gen'rally come back a good deal to visit, so's a man ud often be a'talkin' to his own five-times-great-grandfather who'd left the dry land a couple o' hundred years or so afore.
http://www.dagonbytes.com/thelibrary/lovecraft/theshadowoverinnsmouth.ht...
I would be perfectly okay with allowing the Native Americans to scalp Soros. I'm actually curious about what is under his skin.
There's prolly enough loose hide under his right eye to make a football.
Right on, Bruder, I'm with you all the way. This piece of slime Soros György cares not in the slightest for the peoples of the EU, or Europe more generally. By his own admission, he betrayed his own tribal kith and kin. Not only is Putin the worlds best hope for excising the Brussels black hole, he is the best hope for global transformation away from the evil Empire.
Someone please shoot this POS.
Recycling is way too kind for this guy and all his martini swilling buddies.
There is nothing worth recycling this corpse.
LOL give Ukraine 20 billion, oh ok so the tribe oligarchs can skim most of that money. Gotcha.
Just like they got all the gold shifted out to the NY FRB.
WB7....put a black hood on him and he looks just like the evil emperor Palpatine from Return of the Jedi!
check it out: http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/0e/da/96/0eda969dd30225a578c9c1dee2dab5aa.jpg
heck, he who controls the weather doesnt need any of these weapons, soldiers, or money.
Soros looks better after Banzai's photoshop than he does in real life.
He needs his asshole sutured shut with a nailgun. This fucker is a dirty foulmouthed liar.
Ass + mudhole = yup.
Should be amongst the top 10 of the "die list"
When are we going to quit being so kind? and just get on with the task?
Oh, I see; Soros is insane. I had no idea. Put him on the crosshairs list, I suppose; another wack job who needs to be whacked.
sure, george. as if illuminati interests were in the western people's interest.
no, they would have us send our children to kill and be killed, all for a few more shekels. then, use the various slow kill and fast kill methods for the rest of us.
what a guy.
cocksucking ass pumping shitstain shriveled motherfucking scumsucking fuckfor brains jag off dickheaded prick. fuck you soros.
We have a winner! We have a winner!
"Most creative and vitriolic insult of We All Hate George Soros et al!" goes to this guy!
Sounds as though Georgie's stuck long the Euro at about a buck thirty or so
Mebbe he should go long the Irish Punt?
He seems very worried about Ukaine defaulting or partly defaulting on their debt - and calls any hair-cut by the creditors a 'bail-in'! Who wants to bet he's not long Ukraine debt?
What a complete lizard the man is.
I hope there is a special place in hell for Soros including people like LBK, the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Corzine, everyone who worked at Goldman.
USA Today's headline is lower prices hurting Russia badly. Full on lying by the See Eye Aye press.
Funny how we're told one day that governments are manipulating their currency lower to gain competitive advantage, then the next day we're told sanctions are hurting evil Russia because they're forcing the ruble... lower.
Currency wars not going George's way...
The Demon is back again. Problem is that he may be partially right.Putin and the Russian system is not for the faint-hearted. Anyway - let´s get this show on the road. I wanna see Blackwater blow up some pipe-lines on the Russian side of the border. That shouldn´t be a problem for them if they are what thet are being made out to be.
Elsewhere, Russia issues international arrest warrant for Rothschild and Soros.
http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2014/03/28/vladimir-putin-russia-...
Russia will make The United States reflect upon what they allowed Rothschild to do to their own country.
Go on.....do tell us more.
Not credible site.
Do you consider 60 Minutes to be credible?
KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.
Mr. SOROS: Yes. That's right. Yes.
KROFT: I mean, that's -- that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?
Mr. SOROS: Not -- not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don't -- you don't see the connection. But it was -- it created no -- no problem at all.
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?
Mr. SOROS: No.
That sounds not like a character molded by anything but a Character forgetting his story lines but only remembering the buzzwords...
Satan spoke the same...
Soros is satan
satan takes lessons from this freak
Nobody gets that far without protection from the head criminal pigs. He runs around above the f-ing US gov. acting as the gov. itself. Buying his own media. Just like the mass murderer - Bill the Vaccine Thrill Gates.
Soros is a front for the Rothschilds... he is the head Bilderburg agent.
Soros is a shitstain
by logic he is siding with nazi plants(nulanders) and homespun nazi leftovers in ukraine that putin oposses (along with local ethnic ruskies), hmmm, soryos, think ya on da wrong side of the equasion,ha...
He doesn't feeling any guilt about it because its all lies. What is to be gained by this lie?
saddest of all is that his printed words are published...
I can only be thankful he's not concise. Nobody is going to read that wall o' text.
ditto for his investment theories
Should anyone be surprised? He aligned himself with nazis in WWII Germany and now he is aligned with nazis in the US government...
He go where the money...
filthy lucre
aligned with nazis
National SOCIALISTS.
Precisely.
See Operation "Paper Clip".
Review the creation of the CIA via OSS.
Follow it further back too...
Facists attempt overthrow of USG in 1930's.
Who came first? is the name of the game they want you to play.
I'm thinking we should be playing a new game: who goes first?
What has 60 min to do with that particular site?
I do not consider 60 min credible, or any main media.
I don't watch any US TV. Not in years.
It is mostly entertainment for the brainwashed
again, what has to do with that site linked?
Verrry interesting. things I never would have noticed if not for zero hedge.
"Both the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and European Union have issued an Interpol “Red Notice” which is not only against the immediate arrest of Soros, but also against the Sharks on Finance, Bush, Clinton, criminal organization, Marc Rich and his firm, which is located in Switzerland, the Commodities Broker-Richfield, which is why the Russian Premier Putin has recently met the Chef of the Federal Reserve Bernanke Bermard making clear that the Russian Federation will not accept that such use is made of people like Soros and Rich to commit criminal acts of the derivatives market and Finance, which led to social destabilization across the globe."
OK, not sure if that means that they are charged or not, but a lot of people involved here...
Good luck trying to fly, Soros.
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/groupkltd.com/NoFlyAccords.pdf
Sumbody needa put that phukker outa our sorass misery.
These blood sucking old fossils seem to hanging forever fucking things up. The world will be better off when they are gone.
LOL gosh, he is the kind of slimebucket that makes one miss the pogroms
Vampire blood my man,vampire.
better watch it Georgie boy, you might end up like Viktor Yushchenko
What about Yushchenko?
You probably know only what they told you.
Otherwise, Soros look worse in real.
Do you know something different Genius, please do tell
Soros used to have tête-à-têtes with Yushchenko, just like he does with Porky these days...
in a previous existence, george soros was a tyranasaurus rex.
being top of the food chain then as well, he ruled that kingdom.
but all the other dinosaurs thought he was an evil a**hole too.
then some small furry mammal finally sent a giant meteor to take hin out
same tale, different players...
T-rex were scavengers and carrion eaters.