This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
George Soros Slams Putin, Warns Of "Existential Threat" From Russia, Demands $20 Billion From IMF In "Russia War Effort"
If even George Soros is getting concerned and writing Op-Eds, then Putin must be truly winning.

Here are the highlights from what the Open Society founder has to say about the "existential" Russian threat in a just released Op-Ed:
Europe is facing a challenge from Russia to its very existence. Neither the European leaders nor their citizens are fully aware of this challenge or know how best to deal with it. I attribute this mainly to the fact that the European Union in general and the eurozone in particular lost their way after the financial crisis of 2008.
Getting warmer:
[Europe] fails to recognize that the Russian attack on Ukraine is indirectly an attack on the European Union and its principles of governance. It ought to be evident that it is inappropriate for a country, or association of countries, at war to pursue a policy of fiscal austerity as the European Union continues to do.
Even warmer:
All available resources ought to be put to work in the war effort even if that involves running up budget deficits
And hot, hot, hot:
[IMF] should provide an immediate cash injection of at least $20 billion, with a promise of more when needed. Ukraine’s partners should provide additional financing conditional on implementation of the IMF-supported program, at their own risk, in line with standard practice.
And there it is: the Russian "existential" war threat is, to Soros, nothing but an excuse to end the whole (f)austerity experiment (just don't show Soros Europe's latest record high debt load), and to return to its drunken sailor spending ways.
Ironically, this is precisely what we said would happen, only the globalist neo-cons were hoping the Ukraine civil war would become an all out war between Russia and Ukraine, thus unleashing the "spend your way to prosperity" Soroses of the world. For now, this plan has failed which is why ISIS was brought into the picture.
But it never hurts to try, eh George. And the one thing that is not mentioned is that the people who would gain the most from this latest IMF spending spree would be, you guessed it, billionaires like George Soros of course
* * *
From George Soros, first posted in the New York Reviews Of Books
Wake Up, Europe
Europe is facing a challenge from Russia to its very existence. Neither the European leaders nor their citizens are fully aware of this challenge or know how best to deal with it. I attribute this mainly to the fact that the European Union in general and the eurozone in particular lost their way after the financial crisis of 2008.
The fiscal rules that currently prevail in Europe have aroused a lot of popular resentment. Anti-Europe parties captured nearly 30 percent of the seats in the latest elections for the European Parliament but they had no realistic alternative to the EU to point to until recently. Now Russia is presenting an alternative that poses a fundamental challenge to the values and principles on which the European Union was originally founded. It is based on the use of force that manifests itself in repression at home and aggression abroad, as opposed to the rule of law. What is shocking is that Vladimir Putin’s Russia has proved to be in some ways superior to the European Union—more flexible and constantly springing surprises. That has given it a tactical advantage, at least in the near term.
Europe and the United States—each for its own reasons—are determined to avoid any direct military confrontation with Russia. Russia is taking advantage of their reluctance. Violating its treaty obligations, Russia has annexed Crimea and established separatist enclaves in eastern Ukraine. In August, when the recently installed government in Kiev threatened to win the low-level war in eastern Ukraine against separatist forces backed by Russia, President Putin invaded Ukraine with regular armed forces in violation of the Russian law that exempts conscripts from foreign service without their consent.
In seventy-two hours these forces destroyed several hundred of Ukraine’s armored vehicles, a substantial portion of its fighting force. According to General Wesley Clark, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander for Europe, the Russians used multiple launch rocket systems armed with cluster munitions and thermobaric warheads (an even more inhumane weapon that ought to be outlawed) with devastating effect.* The local militia from the Ukrainian city of Dnepropetrovsk suffered the brunt of the losses because they were communicating by cell phones and could thus easily be located and targeted by the Russians. President Putin has, so far, abided by a cease-fire agreement he concluded with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on September 5, but Putin retains the choice to continue the cease-fire as long as he finds it advantageous or to resume a full-scale assault.
In September, President Poroshenko visited Washington where he received an enthusiastic welcome from a joint session of Congress. He asked for “both lethal and nonlethal” defensive weapons in his speech. However, President Obama refused his request for Javelin hand-held missiles that could be used against advancing tanks. Poroshenko was given radar, but what use is it without missiles? European countries are equally reluctant to provide military assistance to Ukraine, fearing Russian retaliation. The Washington visit gave President Poroshenko a façade of support with little substance behind it.
Equally disturbing has been the determination of official international leaders to withhold new financial commitments to Ukraine until after the October 26 election there (which will take place just after this issue goes to press). This has led to an avoidable pressure on Ukrainian currency reserves and raised the specter of a full-blown financial crisis in the country.
There is now pressure from donors, whether in Europe or the US, to “bail in” the bondholders of Ukrainian sovereign debt, i.e., for bondholders to take losses on their investments as a precondition for further official assistance to Ukraine that would put more taxpayers’ money at risk. That would be an egregious error. The Ukrainian government strenuously opposes the proposal because it would put Ukraine into a technical default that would make it practically impossible for the private sector to refinance its debt. Bailing in private creditors would save very little money and it would make Ukraine entirely dependent on the official donors.
To complicate matters, Russia is simultaneously dangling carrots and wielding sticks. It is offering—but failing to sign—a deal for gas supplies that would take care of Ukraine’s needs for the winter. At the same time Russia is trying to prevent the delivery of gas that Ukraine secured from the European market through Slovakia. Similarly, Russia is negotiating for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to monitor the borders while continuing to attack the Donetsk airport and the port city of Mariupol.
It is easy to foresee what lies ahead. Putin will await the results of the elections on October 26 and then offer Poroshenko the gas and other benefits he has been dangling on condition that he appoint a prime minister acceptable to Putin. That would exclude anybody associated with the victory of the forces that brought down the Viktor Yanukovych government by resisting it for months on the Maidan—Independence Square. I consider it highly unlikely that Poroshenko would accept such an offer. If he did, he would be disowned by the defenders of the Maidan; the resistance forces would then be revived.
Putin may then revert to the smaller victory that would still be within his reach: he could open by force a land route from Russia to Crimea and Transnistria before winter. Alternatively, he could simply sit back and await the economic and financial collapse of Ukraine. I suspect that he may be holding out the prospect of a grand bargain in which Russia would help the United States against ISIS—for instance by not supplying to Syria the S300 missiles it has promised, thus in effect preserving US air domination—and Russia would be allowed to have its way in the “near abroad,” as many of the nations adjoining Russia are called. What is worse, President Obama may accept such a deal.
That would be a tragic mistake, with far-reaching geopolitical consequences. Without underestimating the threat from ISIS, I would argue that preserving the independence of Ukraine should take precedence; without it, even the alliance against ISIS would fall apart. The collapse of Ukraine would be a tremendous loss for NATO, the European Union, and the United States. A victorious Russia would become much more influential within the EU and pose a potent threat to the Baltic states with their large ethnic Russian populations. Instead of supporting Ukraine, NATO would have to defend itself on its own soil. This would expose both the EU and the US to the danger they have been so eager to avoid: a direct military confrontation with Russia. The European Union would become even more divided and ungovernable. Why should the US and other NATO nations allow this to happen?
The argument that has prevailed in both Europe and the United States is that Putin is no Hitler; by giving him everything he can reasonably ask for, he can be prevented from resorting to further use of force. In the meantime, the sanctions against Russia—which include, for example, restrictions on business transactions, finance, and trade—will have their effect and in the long run Russia will have to retreat in order to earn some relief from them.
These are false hopes derived from a false argument with no factual evidence to support it. Putin has repeatedly resorted to force and he is liable to do so again unless he faces strong resistance. Even if it is possible that the hypothesis could turn out to be valid, it is extremely irresponsible not to prepare a Plan B.
There are two counterarguments that are less obvious but even more important. First, Western authorities have ignored the importance of what I call the “new Ukraine” that was born in the successful resistance on the Maidan. Many officials with a history of dealing with Ukraine have difficulty adjusting to the revolutionary change that has taken place there. The recently signed Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine was originally negotiated with the Yanukovych government. This detailed road map now needs adjustment to a totally different situation. For instance, the road map calls for the gradual replacement and retraining of the judiciary over five years whereas the public is clamoring for immediate and radical renewal. As the new mayor of Kiev, Vitali Klitschko, put it, “If you put fresh cucumbers into a barrel of pickles, they will soon turn into pickles.”
Contrary to some widely circulated accounts, the resistance on the Maidan was led by the cream of civil society: young people, many of whom had studied abroad and refused to join either government or business on their return because they found both of them repugnant. (Nationalists and anti-Semitic extremists made up only a minority of the anti-Yanukovych protesters.) They are the leaders of the new Ukraine and they are adamantly opposed to a return of the “old Ukraine,” with its endemic corruption and ineffective government.
The new Ukraine has to contend with Russian aggression, bureaucratic resistance both at home and abroad, and confusion in the general population. Surprisingly, it has the support of many oligarchs, President Poroshenko foremost among them, and the population at large. There are of course profound differences in history, language, and outlook between the eastern and western parts of the country, but Ukraine is more united and more European-minded than ever before. That unity, however, is extremely fragile.
The new Ukraine has remained largely unrecognized because it took time before it could make its influence felt. It had practically no security forces at its disposal when it was born. The security forces of the old Ukraine were actively engaged in suppressing the Maidan rebellion and they were disoriented this summer when they had to take orders from a government formed by the supporters of the rebellion. No wonder that the new government was at first unable to put up an effective resistance to the establishment of the separatist enclaves in eastern Ukraine. It is all the more remarkable that President Poroshenko was able, within a few months of his election, to mount an attack that threatened to reclaim those enclaves.
To appreciate the merits of the new Ukraine you need to have had some personal experience with it. I can speak from personal experience although I must also confess to a bias in its favor. I established a foundation in Ukraine in 1990 even before the country became independent. Its board and staff are composed entirely of Ukrainians and it has deep roots in civil society. I visited the country often, especially in the early years, but not between 2004 and early 2014, when I returned to witness the birth of the new Ukraine.
I was immediately impressed by the tremendous improvement in maturity and expertise during that time both in my foundation and in civil society at large. Currently, civic and political engagement is probably higher than anywhere else in Europe. People have proven their willingness to sacrifice their lives for their country. These are the hidden strengths of the new Ukraine that have been overlooked by the West.
The other deficiency of the current European attitude toward Ukraine is that it fails to recognize that the Russian attack on Ukraine is indirectly an attack on the European Union and its principles of governance. It ought to be evident that it is inappropriate for a country, or association of countries, at war to pursue a policy of fiscal austerity as the European Union continues to do. All available resources ought to be put to work in the war effort even if that involves running up budget deficits. The fragility of the new Ukraine makes the ambivalence of the West all the more perilous. Not only the survival of the new Ukraine but the future of NATO and the European Union itself is at risk. In the absence of unified resistance it is unrealistic to expect that Putin will stop pushing beyond Ukraine when the division of Europe and its domination by Russia is in sight.
Having identified some of the shortcomings of the current approach, I will try to spell out the course that Europe ought to follow. Sanctions against Russia are necessary but they are a necessary evil. They have a depressive effect not only on Russia but also on the European economies, including Germany. This aggravates the recessionary and deflationary forces that are already at work. By contrast, assisting Ukraine in defending itself against Russian aggression would have a stimulative effect not only on Ukraine but also on Europe. That is the principle that ought to guide European assistance to Ukraine.
Germany, as the main advocate of fiscal austerity, needs to understand the internal contradiction involved. Chancellor Angela Merkel has behaved as a true European with regard to the threat posed by Russia. She has been the foremost advocate of sanctions on Russia, and she has been more willing to defy German public opinion and business interests on this than on any other issue. Only after the Malaysian civilian airliner was shot down in July did German public opinion catch up with her. Yet on fiscal austerity she has recently reaffirmed her allegiance to the orthodoxy of the Bundesbank—probably in response to the electoral inroads made by the Alternative for Germany, the anti-euro party. She does not seem to realize how inconsistent that is. She ought to be even more committed to helping Ukraine than to imposing sanctions on Russia.
The new Ukraine has the political will both to defend Europe against Russian aggression and to engage in radical structural reforms. To preserve and reinforce that will, Ukraine needs to receive adequate assistance from its supporters. Without it, the results will be disappointing and hope will turn into despair. Disenchantment already started to set in after Ukraine suffered a military defeat and did not receive the weapons it needs to defend itself.
It is high time for the members of the European Union to wake up and behave as countries indirectly at war. They are better off helping Ukraine to defend itself than having to fight for themselves. One way or another, the internal contradiction between being at war and remaining committed to fiscal austerity has to be eliminated. Where there is a will, there is a way.
Let me be specific. In its last progress report, issued in early September, the IMF estimated that in a worst-case scenario Ukraine would need additional support of $19 billion. Conditions have deteriorated further since then. After the Ukrainian elections the IMF will need to reassess its baseline forecast in consultation with the Ukrainian government. It should provide an immediate cash injection of at least $20 billion, with a promise of more when needed. Ukraine’s partners should provide additional financing conditional on implementation of the IMF-supported program, at their own risk, in line with standard practice.
The spending of borrowed funds is controlled by the agreement between the IMF and the Ukrainian government. Four billion dollars would go to make up the shortfall in Ukrainian payments to date; $2 billion would be assigned to repairing the coal mines in eastern Ukraine that remain under the control of the central government; and $2 billion would be earmarked for the purchase of additional gas for the winter. The rest would replenish the currency reserves of the central bank.
The new assistance package would include a debt exchange that would transform Ukraine’s hard currency Eurobond debt (which totals almost $18 billion) into long-term, less risky bonds. This would lighten Ukraine’s debt burden and bring down its risk premium. By participating in the exchange, bondholders would agree to accept a lower interest rate and wait longer to get their money back. The exchange would be voluntary and market-based so that it could not be mischaracterized as a default. Bondholders would participate willingly because the new long-term bonds would be guaranteed—but only partially—by the US or Europe, much as the US helped Latin America emerge from its debt crisis in the 1980s with so-called Brady bonds (named for US Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady).
Such an exchange would have a few important benefits. One is that, over the next two or three critical years, the government could use considerably less of its scarce hard currency reserves to pay off bondholders. The money could be used for other urgent needs.
By trimming Ukraine debt payments in the next few years, the exchange would also reduce the chance of a sovereign default, discouraging capital flight and arresting the incipient run on the banks. This would make it easier to persuade owners of Ukraine’s banks (many of them foreign) to inject urgently needed new capital into them. The banks desperately need bigger capital cushions if Ukraine is to avoid a full-blown banking crisis, but shareholders know that a debt crisis could cause a banking crisis that wipes out their equity.
Finally, Ukraine would keep bondholders engaged rather than watch them cash out at 100 cents on the dollar as existing debt comes due in the next few years. This would make it easier for Ukraine to reenter the international bond markets once the crisis has passed. Under the current conditions it would be more practical and cost-efficient for the US and Europe not to use their own credit directly to guarantee part of Ukraine’s debt, but to employ intermediaries such as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development or the World Bank and its subsidiaries.
The Ukrainian state-owned company Naftogaz is a black hole in the budget and a major source of corruption. Naftogaz currently sells gas to households for $47 per trillion cubic meters (TCM), for which it pays $380 per TCM. At present people cannot control the temperature in their apartments. A radical restructuring of Naftogaz’s entire system could reduce household consumption at least by half and totally eliminate Ukraine’s dependence on Russia for gas. That would involve charging households the market price for gas. The first step would be to install meters in apartments and the second to distribute a cash subsidy to needy households.
The will to make these reforms is strong both in the new management and in the incoming government but the task is extremely complicated (how do you define who is needy?) and the expertise is inadequate. The World Bank and its subsidiaries could sponsor a project development team that would bring together international and domestic experts to convert the existing political will into bankable projects. The initial cost would exceed $10 billion but it could be financed by project bonds issued by the European Investment Bank and it would produce very high returns.
It is also high time for the European Union to take a critical look at itself. There must be something wrong with the EU if Putin’s Russia can be so successful even in the short term. The bureaucracy of the EU no longer has a monopoly of power and it has little to be proud of. It should learn to be more united, flexible, and efficient. And Europeans themselves need to take a close look at the new Ukraine. That could help them recapture the original spirit that led to the creation of the European Union. The European Union would save itself by saving Ukraine.
—October 23, 2014
- 75041 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


Good point on the female line.
I've familiar with Ponerology. Dark stuff.
Putin is over the target zone, hence, lots of flak.
The world needs one less psychopath.
Fuck George Soros!
"Contrary to some widely circulated accounts, the resistance on the Maidan was led by the cream of civil society: young people, many of whom had studied abroad and refused to join either government or business on their return because they found both of them repugnant. (Nationalists and anti-Semitic extremists made up only a minority of the anti-Yanukovych protesters.) They are the leaders of the new Ukraine and they are adamantly opposed to a return of the “old Ukraine,” with its endemic corruption and ineffective government."
then why the heck did nazis get 4 ministres, and old regime guys became prime minister and president? how many of those "young people, many of whom had studied abroad" got ministries??? LIAR!
That is one fuckin ugly dude.
I cldnt even finish my sandwich.
Soros is just pissed off that his little plan for Ukraine failed. All those millions or billions invested in color revolutions and Otpor style movements were for nothing. It only gave Putin an opporunity to seize Crimea and to divide the country. But what were you thinking Soros? That Ukraine just like Serbia would roll over? Ukraine has a sizeable population of Russian decent and there are millions of mixed marriages. How was that ever going to work? Or is there a higher plan?
Soros is an evil evil MF'er. He had his little puppet McCain bowing to him at Davos. McCain shows up with ISIS then with the Ukraine junta. A real POS like his old man the admiral who sold out the USS Liberty,
Soros is not the founder of Open Society founder. Karl Popper is.
Soros, why don't you take your Ebola bioweapon and shove it up your rear! This bitch is a Zionist criminal in the truest sense. Same to that arse wipe Gates!
You can rest assured that CNN (now the Clown News Network) will play along with anything the string pullers in the shadows come up with.
News in the US has become so pathetic (more like TMC) that I can't stand to watch any network news anymore. 90% fluff. But even the BBC and
German ARD are totally manipulating, just not on the retard level like here.
How is this man not swinging from a telephone pole?
Blackwater security.
Why does it seem as though interminable assholes like Soros live forever?
...or that butchers and war criminals usually die in bed like stalin, idi amin, pol pot, etc...
Yep, that trope that those who live by the sword die by the sword is just plain wrong. Add in Mao, Truman, LBJ, Molotov etc. etc.
Where's my fully automatic, belt-fed nail gun?
Actually, if you look real close, I'm not so sure he's really still alive so much as undead.
Make my nails silver, please.
Where's my fully automatic, belt-fed nail gun?...
Don't you ask yourself from time to time what must be running through the minds of such depraved SOBs that take his money and look the other way in return for all the destruction and chaos this fucking monster sows?...
Then again?...
How many people in .gov land were responsible and involved in making our "state of emergency" doctrine a success 13 years ago to nail our "coffin shut" and to this day keep looking the other way for the steamy golden shower this decrepit pile of excrement generously bestows on their heads in the form of a "paycheck" which they will do anything for, including sucking that raisin shriveled dick of his?!!!
After all this, is anybody out there???....
At least he's not as dangerous as those Koch bothers
It's good to be Goy.
Yep..all those Soros type turds are totally pissed their investment in Ukraine war was wasted because Putin was wise up to their game.
Dear George, guess what, if you got your wish, global war/nuclear war....well guess what, all your mates will be wiped from the face of the earth. You can be sure that Russia and China will make sure of it.............
Ukraine Kyiv vs. Novorossiya
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2014/10/ukraine-mini-sitrep-very-ominous.html
The men on the Novorossiya side are impressive. Strelkov (I know he is a Russian), Aleksandr Zakharchenko (awesome), Alexey Mozgovoy and his Ghost Brigade and Motorola.
They are amazing and have been practically begging the Ukie conscripts to quit and not fight.
Hopefully the people of the Ukraine will go after the oligarchs-dual citizens in Kiev who caused this.
Well lookout! The politicians of the world will probably treat this like tablets from god although it will lead in the opposite direction.
Just talking his book.
Sanctions, both trade and financial, are acts of war that roughly equate to a medeival siege. And these clowns think there won't be blowback from the victims? The Anglo/Zio Empire is in the early stage of collapse and those most bennefitting from its depredations on the rest of us are beginning to squeal.
May every sociopathic billionaire experience total ruin including all 545 of the US variety.
Ya know, a little preparation H can do wonders with those bags under the eyes.
Tightens the skin.
Russia is an "Existential Threat" to the Zionist World Order - there fixed that for ya Soros.
Zionists are an "Existential Threat" to the Zionist World Order - there fixed
The only thing at risk with a European pivot towards Russia is the vig.
Most powerful scumbag woman most people outside Illinois have never heard of. Actual brain behind dear dictator.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/oct/22/valerie-jarrett-post-spi...
Is this guy ever going to die?
He was never alive.
He is death.
we pity frankesteins monster because he is a victim
an innocent.
was soros ever innocent
sonder commando in concentration camps.
pulling gold teeth rummaging through pockets
always looking for diamonds and most of all gold.
as a child he was a killer a thug a thief.
what perfect psychologies for his main job rothschild trouble shooter.
this relic lives by taking the blood and fear hormones of children.
and let us not forget the glands.
sacred pineal and pituitary mysterious amygdala glands consumed in masonic ritual.
satan lives on with the help of these cancerous rabbinical papal masonic devils.
even with his desperate ifusions of baby blood this vampyre will soon be exiting and plunging downwards.
his kosher job incomplete.
a curse on your diseased soul soros and god willing an eternity of pain.
t
One of your best.
You're a poet as well as a scholar!
Sounds like the banking families want Russia back. Guess they expect to use more American blood to get it for them.
I've fixed him:
Russia has annexed Crimea that willingly asked for it and established separatist enclaves in eastern Ukraine with local people who willingly joined them. In August, when the recently installed by US unelected government in Kiev threatened to win the low-level war by mindlessly sending one battalion after another one into traps in eastern Ukraine against separatist forces backed by Russia, President Putin invaded Ukraine with invisible armed forces in non-violation of the Russian law that exempts conscripts from foreign service without their consent unless they are volunteers.
In seventy-two hours these forces destroyed several hundred of Ukraine’s armored vehicles, a substantial portion of its fighting force. According to General Wesley Clark, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander for Europe, the Russians used multiple invisible launch rocket systems armed with cluster munitions and thermobaric warheads (an even more inhumane weapon that ought to be outlawed but not so inhumane as white phosphorus tkat Kiev forces are using and is in fact outlawed) with devastating effect. The local militia from the Ukrainian city of Dnepropetrovsk suffered the brunt of the losses because they were communicating by cell phones and could thus easily be located and targeted by the invisible Russians, that could not be targeted by Ukrainian bombers or artillery even with the aid of US satellites and drones. President Putin has, so far, abided by a cease-fire agreement he was calling for from the beggining of ATO concluded with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on September 5, but Putin retains the choice to continue the cease-fire as long as he finds it advantageous or to resume afull-scale invisible air assault that no OSCE monitor and no US satellite has ever seen so far.
There is now pressure from donors, whether in Europe or the US, to “bail in” the bondholders of Ukrainian sovereign debt, i.e., for bondholders, like ME to take losses on their financial and political investments as a precondition for further official assistance to Ukraine that would put more taxpayers’ money at risk. That would be an egregious error because I'm not used to lose money.
" but not so inhumane as white phosphorus tkat Kiev forces are using and is in fact outlawed" You forgot cluster bombs, too, but good correction otherwise.
I wonder how much of Soros' fortune is tied up in illiquid Ukrainian investments.
And this:
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2014/10/ukraine-mini-sitrep-very-ominous.html
General Wesley Clark - another dual citizen like Soros. I bet McCain is one as well.
Source?
I forgot to fix this, it should read:
(...)According to General Wesley Clark, my CIA contact telling me what to think and what to do, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander for Europe(...)
He is sending out an oligarch "mayday"........
So much more efficient than several thousand individual phone calls.
Ruin to them all.
The world's largest parasite; a crony capitalist mooch. Translation of Op-Ed: Please save my Euro positions. What a fucking asshat.
www.traderzoo.mobi
The Bankers, and the usual suspects have ben gunning for Russia since the fall of the USSR, and the thefts of the oligarchs, 7 of 8 of the initial lot Jewish in a country which is less than 2% Jewsih, no doubt set Russia back decades while enriching the UK and Israel.
Nothing has changed but the names, but the real place to keep a eye for old money bankster fucker is in Brazil....
I think the bankers and ghosts might find more trouble than they'd care to deal with if they fuck with Brazil. Brazilians know what's up. They know who pulls on the leash of the Americans, and they know all about private central banking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7tupJRSi7M
http://beirut.indymedia.org/images/2004/04/1133.png
Anti-semitism charge is increasingly being leveled against Israel’s mainstream criticsMaybe you saw that a top minister in Israel’s government accused John Kerry, the US secretary of state, of anti-Semitism? John Kerry made the mistake of saying that if only Israel made peace with the Palestinians, that would cut down on extremism in the region. From Haaretz:
Here are Kerry’s original remarks, on Thursday:
Bennett’s accusation is not singular. As Israel grows more isolated in world opinion in the wake of the Gaza slaughter, the anti-Semitism charge is being thrown around in a new way, at a new crowd. It’s now slung whenever westerners are too critical of Israel.
Ari Shavit, the writer who’s a darling of liberal Zionists, accused westerners of anti-Semitism at the end of the Gaza onslaught:
A very similar charge was made by Matti Friedman, a former AP reporter in Jerusalem, who accused international media, including American outlets, of anti-Semitism for the way they told the story of the Gaza onslaught, as being Israel’s fault, when the real story was that Israel was taking on Hamas just as the US is taking on ISIS. At On the Media (minute 5):
Also in the context of Gaza, Human Rights Watch director Ken Roth was accused of a “deepseated hostility to the Jewish state” and an “immoral anti-Israel obsession.” Roth (whose father escaped Nazi Germany) has said that the charge is a charge of anti-Semitism.
Also in the context of Gaza, religion writer Mark Oppenheimer wrote at Tablet that liberal Protestants who support Palestinian rights seem to him to be anti-Semitic because they have a caricature of Jews as the Israel lobby and
I do wonder if the anti-Semitism charge is being exhausted by this extensive service, that it’s losing its sting. More wild accusations of anti-Semitism:
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has accused Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem of being anti-Semites, in the Jerusalem Post, for saying that the Gaza slaughter amounted to a “genocide.”
David Horowitz has said that Barack Obama is anti-Semitic because he supports the Palestinian Authority, which includes Hamas.
Mike Huckabee said that Obama is anti-Semitic in his response to violence in the West Bank last summer.
Einat Wilf, a former member of the Israeli Knesset, accused former British foreign secretary Jack Straw of anti-semitism for stating that the Israel lobby has too much control over US policymaking. Chuck Hagel and John Mearsheimer and Steve Walt were all meretriciously accused of anti-Semitism for that allegation.
Had enough?
Shining Light on Roots of Terrorism:
...
For some reason I'm beginning to think that sarcasm is self-evident and doesn't need a /sarc tag, at this point.
Yeah, I know... there's a reason that there's a huge Holocaust Memorial in DC and not a Slave Memorial or a Native American Memorial or anything that would make much sense, at all. Cultural domination... masked as freedumb for the goyim. Still waiting on every tribe that's been used like a tool against another tribe (perhaps blacks at the NAACP) to turn on their owners, owners like Donald "I'm not a racist." Sterling.
Maybe it'll be more white liberals. Ben Affleck recently got very upset when Bill Maher and Sam Harris said, "Liberals have failed us." Not a useful enough tool, I guess.. Or perhaps it will be more and more conservatives, as they realize that they've been neoCONned into wars. They could all get more "antisemitic" if they get tired of freedumb and are not close enough to the top of the pyramid scheme that Team America, World Ponzi Police is supposed to keep safe. Goyim golem. Shabbat goyim. However you want to put it. Supposedly secular people tried to reform Judaism and "Jewishness" in general. Yet it looks rather suspiciously as if Judaism re-formed many tribalists that claim to be secular. Allan Greenspan was sworn in on the Talmud, not sure about Bernanke and Yellen...
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/jewish-ex-argentina-ministe...
Soros deals in money and blood.
What a fucking mess. They don't meter the gas, they just use as much as possible. Probably have the windows open in January. Turn off the gas Putin.
Yes, window is thermostat manually
Seversk (formerly Tomsk 7, Siberia) is same, but heat is steam from Nuclear old system
is freepay by product of nuke piped heats city
Already below freeze in Kyiv.
Early.
Tomsk, south Siberia already to zero F and accumulate snow
No sure that supposed deal for winter gas for Ukraine will work...They must pay for part of past due.
They can't stop stealing..it is genetic
then there is this:
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2014/10/ukraine-mini-sitrep-very-ominous.html
bailout
Soros = scumbag of all scumbags,warmongering, money-junkie, old POS !
....that's putting it mildly.
The douchebags are getting desperate! I love it!
At least he had the decency to refer to the Kiev junta as "installed" although he left out that the chocolate king got a lot of help from CIA and Polish and Xe mercs...
It was after this further meddling by the US/NATO that Russia sent in significant military forces, including spetznaz... enough to make the US/NATO appreciate that in a land war near Russia's borders - NATO/US would at best take very heavy losses - and they would not have air superiority {perhaps dominance}.
This handful of neocon and neoliberal warmongers are not working for the American people. A few hundred rebel soldiers could take them out in a weekend, if only there were rebel, that is, loyal to the U.S., soldiers enough...
"Installed" by the junta shooting innocent Ukrainians in the back and blaming the elected govt. Just like they blamed Putin for shooting down the Malay airliner which could have been the recycled other Malay airliner they took out.
"I am not a Nazi war profiteer!"
"Now Russia is presenting an alternative that poses a fundamental challenge to the values and principles on which the European Union was originally founded. It is based on the use of force that manifests itself in repression at home and aggression abroad, as opposed to the rule of law."
Tyler, is that really you speaking?
Or is it a panel discussion and now it's Soros' turn?
This claim about Russia is not supported by evidence, and repeating it is spreading war propaganda. Turn to almost any other channel you get a bellyful of it - which to the mind appears to be evidence but it's not. It's just the Big Lie technique at work.
Whoops! My Bad! That was Soros speaking!
The Geopolitics of World War III^ excellent.
as is: The Covert Origins of ISIS
this guy has been f**king people since he was a kid. it's mine, all mine, sociopathic moron. who reads the ny review of books, anyway. rave on george, you useless pile of dogsh*t.
Paging George Soros... paging George Soros...
Report immediately to the nearest rubber room - the experiment of splicing your genes with Jabba The Hutt has gone terribly wrong.
This was my favorite Soros line:
"Instead of supporting Ukraine, NATO would have to defend itself on its own soil."
What a concept.
that's one sick bastard!
The child-eating warmonger will fund the war chest of his favorite child-eating presidential candidate.
George Soros, another member of the free money club. He's not intelligent, he's not hardworking, he's not wise, he's not prescient. He just gets free money to play with.
The same with his brethren Carl Icahn and their little buddy Sam Zell. A bunch of moronic schemers with access to the free money club.
Add in Saban and Adelson and there's probably only a couple dozen or so more Jewish billionaires who are disproportionately responsible for the world's greatest economic and war crimes.
Off the top, I'll add in Ukraine's Kolomoyski, an Israeli citizena and ardent Zionist, he was likely responsible for the horrific massacre in massacre {which the media dropped right away when it was clear that the 'Maidan' was responsible, not the evil Russian speakers} and, a little bird told me, the attempted false flag shootdown of a Malaysian airliner.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ihor_Kolomoyskyi
Virtually every sentence in Soros the Nazi Ghoul's screed is a demonstrable lie.
So George Soros, Hungarian Jew is 84 years old and frightened Russia might outlive him. Can't he eat the hearts of young Africans or drink the blood of virgins to retai his youthful innocence, or is mortality beckoning ?
The thought of life existing without him must have him desperate to revive his fellow Hungarian Edward Teller as Dr Strangelove
Remember - Russia gets sanctions, Israel gets foreign aid...
To learn who rules over you, find out who you can't criticiseWhat on earth could have prompted this diatribe from ol’ George?
Perhaps it’s what appears to be Putin’s existential threat to Russia’s central bank. At least that’s my interpretation of what appears to be a well-reasoned, factually-based argument made extemporaneously by Sergy Glazyev (economic advisor to Putin) that the Central Bank of Russia is acting solely in the interests of foreign capital (his words! [but my emphasis]) by: (i) its strict limitations on the creation of credit, effectively sabotaging Russia’s ability to implement import substitution via home-grown industries; and (ii) its complete inaction on proposals made ~5 years ago to develop a SWIFT-like system. He basically accused Russia’s central bank of being a subversive vector posing an existential threat to Russia’s sovereignty, concluding that the central bank (a BIS member) must be completely reorganized.
I found the below video on the Saker’s site (http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/). The link is to a point in the video in which a reporter recaps the long-winded Glazyev’s points in order to frame a question to Glazyev. However, the entire video is well worth watching.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH4Pcgoi3eE&t=63m35s
(Incidentally, the Saker could really use some donations. Just sayin’ . . .)
Good catch. I watched half that video ... had no idea how good the second half was.
These top economists in Russia are strongly calling for the heads of the Russian Central Bank staff, who they say are more favorable to foreign creditors than to Russia. Glasciev castigates the U.S. for losing all moral credibility and mocks Europe for following them, to their own destruction. Quite a piece.
The Russian Central Bank is bound to heavy government regulation, but is privately owned.
I've been unable to find out who owns it - but I'd be willing to venture a guess...
As noted in an earlier post, supposedly Red Shield has its eyes on Brazil... I'd expect the usual protests, and sudden hit pieces on Brazil's economy, 'antisemitism {pro-Palestinian/anti-war crime} and such...
from last year:
Putin’s Purge Of The Rothschild Money Changers From Russia: Another Rothschild Goon Found Dead & Another Flees To U.K.You have to bear in mind - the head of the Russian mob is Jewish, and almost all of the oligarchs who made their billions looting Russian natural resources under Yeltsin were Jews with ties to NY and London finance. Jews are under 1% of Ukraine's population, but every candidate discussed by Nuland and co are at least partly Jewish and Jews as a group are in fact a wealthy and privileged minority which would benefit the most with EU integration, IMF loans, and more ties to Israel's Shin Bet and Mossad...
Maybe the "canards" aren't all that untrue....
Russia Resists.
Oh and that journalist who was Polonium'ed in London. It appears it may have been Berezovsky. The guy had a lot of enemies and had his own paid killers.
Everyone.... Lets promise when he dies we all have a celebration on ZH...Please
We will all have a drink the day this fucker dies...
A toast... to the death of a tyrant.
ATTENTION ALL IDIOT COMMENTERS
PAID PROPAGANDA TROLLS INCLUDED (good job zerohedge)
Soros is simply right. By the way he is worth 20 Billion and not many years left.
Do you think it is cruical for him to make more money?
Read what he wrote and think.
If he's worth $20 Billion, then let HIM take care of that $20 Billion immediate cash injection he's demanding for Ukraine.
...and, who's the propaganda tool???
...you should ask yourself who is responsible for more dead children, ruined countries, and wrecked economies around the world, $oros or Putin. The answer is very clear. $oros lusts for blood and enjoys profiting from death, destruction, and the suffering of others. $oros bankrolls his favorite War Party politicians. Money is not his main driver.
Soros also lavishly finances a range of 'institutions' throughout Russia and Eastern Europe that actively promote birth control and especially abortions. Bear in mind that the population of this region, at least the non-Muslim one, is already declining rapidly.
Will this fucker ever die? That childrens' blood must be good stuff.
it must be so bad being a obama/soros clown, silly mafuker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXVwdzCRClg the protocols
Soros is not the master because he is just a tool. Fuck those behind him.
that satanistic putin, just sitting back watching the nwo puppet-masters, (the ones who suck trillions out of the system for personal, political, and ideoligcal power), lose their control.
for people like soros, even the thought of a eu break-up is un-thinkable.
at least soros's article proves the nwo puppet-masters are all long ww111.
human lives, or sufferings don't even come into consideration, when nwo means accomplish their ends.
If Geo Soros is against it, I'm for it. And versa vice. What a windbag. Putin has him really scared. Soros would have served mankind better had he asked for 20 billion to get rid of Obola.
Enough with DorianGreyEyeBags. Please, Lord, give him the hook already.
Who do I bill for harshing my mellow.
Smellin George Soros' "sulphur!... Dress rehearsal for the "Samson Option" for all the anointed Zionist tribe members that ain't gettin their way and are "losing there shirts" on the bad choices they they created for themselves!
Guess President Obama wasn't joking last March when Israel shut down all of their embassies?... That one was obviously practice as well!
"Zionist tribe members ain't gettin their way and are "losing there shirts"
In Russia maybe, But not south of the border in Ukraine where they hold all the top political and economic positions and have somehow managed shift that unfortunate country's gold holdings to the NY FRB for (cough) safe keeping.
True MB, but for how long?...
I think ol' Georgy is rather pissed at losing money on his gamble in Kiev -wouldn't you say???...
There's a Ukrainian emigre in my town who says the kulaks are sharpening their knives waiting the opportunity to wreak vengeance. The Tribe never know when to stop, do they Nemo?
There's a Ukrainian emigre in my town who says the kulaks are sharpening their knives waiting the vopportunity to wreak vengeance.
Great!
Then let him start with George Soros, cause God knows there isn't anyone with a soul left in this Country prepared to risk their own necks for all the harm he and his ilk have created in their lifetime!
The only way it will affect America is when we collectively lose everything that George Soros worships and thats obviously is coming given his rather blunt pronouncements in this essay -then these motherfuckers will be 5,000 feet underground or long gone where nobody will ever speak their names again until the "coast is clear" -whatever that will look like!
"The only way it will affect America is when we collectively lose everything "
And that my friend is the nub of the issue. None of those Homer Simpsons out there wll unass themselves from the lobotomy box as long as it stays on and they have money for beer. As Lenin said, 'worse is better'. Bring on the dollar crash and the ensuing global cleansing hellfire.
I'm thinking this little outburst of Georgie's will make for some lulz.
Enjoy your polonium cocktail, asshole.
Simple rule of thumb: Oppose whatever that Luciferian demon is proposing.
-1 for 'Luiciferian' - absurd, zionist gate-keeping nonsense. I believe, fwiw, you are duped, not a liar...
"The Phony Litvinenko Murder" William Dunkerley
Media dumb you down much?
I hope I am around to pull this fucks teeth when he croaks.
Soros' tribe had their way with Russia for 70 years. And then it was over. Too bad sheenies.
But they went out with a bang. Larry ('Larry the Looter) Summers and his buddies cleaned out the country while implementing "capitalism" under Yeltsin.
+1 - just about all of the oligarchs/thieves were Jews and so were many or most of their helpers in the US/UK.
Think there's any chance of a 'Jewish' international "conspiracy" or can "Joos" never conspire, only "Zionists"?
You see, when half of the billioniares and millionaires in the US are Jewish {only a fraction being Zionist}, if you're honest, you simply assume that there are multiple agreements or arrangements that amount to tacit, if not explicit, 'Jewish conspiracies'.
In other words - just because theory x, y, or z, is called "anti-Semitic" - does that simultaneously mean that it is untrue?
What about if one posits a 'conspiracy' amongst wealthy Arab aristocrats to arm and fund ISIS, as seems to be true. They are 'Semites' - but is it okay to talk about and not 'racist' because it's only racist to posit such schemes when they involved Jews? That's quite the fortuitous double standard, eh? So good no MSM outlet ever noted that the theft of Russian wealth under Yeltsin was absolutely, basically Jewish, as was the neocon effort to lie the US into Iraq.
That it involves very few people and not 'all' or even most of any group is obvious. But so is the fact that it is Jewish people, separate and apart from their political ideology [Zionism] who seems to be playing a very disproportionate role in Russia, Ukraine, the US, UK, Canada, Australia, France and elsewhere...
In France, AIPAC/ADL is called CRIF
Read your Henry Ford.
The Nation: The Harvard Boys Do Russia
http://www.thenation.com/article/harvard-boys-do-russia
15 Years of Putin
http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.com/2014/06/15-years-of-putin-rule-in-one-inf...
Loot Laundered when everything shut down after 9/11 at BONY facilities in Utica,NY.The haul was so Gargantuan there was "no other way."
FUCK you George Soros!
First class shitbag who bet big on stealing Ukraine's now unused nat gas pipelines. Suck it, Soros. Next time pay off the Russians instead of the Ukrainians. You spent big on chaos and you lost. What were you thinking, you dumbshit? Your plan was always going to fail because it was stupid.
The existential threat is to Russia and it is based on the US war mongering in Ukraine in spite of Nato pledges made that have not been honored. The Soros, Kissinger, Wolfowitz et al tribe of war criminals should try and obtain a sliver of honor in life before they are led en masse to the gallows and a death they are destined for when the war front shifts from the stans to 5th avenue. It is always interesting to observe that the new world order proponents always assume the old world puppet masters will continue to run the show when the plates stop spinning. Perhaps one of the byproducts of inbreeding is a mistaken sense of invincibility.
Jesus, someone smother that cunt already.
Since you bring it up google "life extension". Take a look at the research and resources available to prolong and extend quality life.
Then look at what Hillary did to the FDA, Department of Health & NSF to criminalize & block access to these resources. This is a major aspect of the ACA enslavement law. You can be very sure this monster, and the rest of the Monster Race are getting treatment that is not permitted to us. Gatekeepers suppressing and stealing innovation. In all fields.
"The collapse of Ukraine would be a tremendous loss for NATO, the European Union, and the United States."
What an arrogant statement;
NATO, EU, or USA don't own Ukraine, this country is being used in their effort to collapse Russia, without actually going to war with her. But Putin has seen through all this smoke and mirrors, which is why he annexed Crimea in the first place.
Putin and China, are protecting Assad, who will not play ball to the Americans, they want all oil in the ME, in petro dollar, but more and more are opposing them. US create ISIS, who will attack Assad under the guise of attacking Iraq, thus stopping the Russia - Syria pipe-line from being used.
The game is only beginning.........
It IS an arrogant statement, isn't it?
I suppose I could say that Brad Pitt's marriage to Jolie was a tremendous loss for me...that would be kinda like what he's saying.
Oh Jesus Christ! How much more obvious could these people be? So, the Europeans aren't moving fast enough with their own QE? They have to throw a little "Evil Empire threat" in there to inspire them to get a move on?
I guess WE'RE about tapped-out, gotta look elsewhere for the "fix" they need to keep the old 'high' going. And if those Europeans won't print money to keep the global Ponzi going, why then, we'll just remind them of those evil Russkies next door who want to steal their land and eat their children. THAT'LL get the stubborn fucks to open the wallet already...
I mean, it's obvious that Americans aren't going for the bait, can't seem to drum up the old 'rah! rah!' for war here these days.
War...the last refuge of a desperate Old Guard.
What is his problem? Filthy rich Soros shall invite his buddies and do a fundraiser for Ukraine instead of begging for taxpayer money. Problem solved.
Does Mr. Soros volunteer to personally lead a brigade into combat? Sure seem to be more chickenhawks every day. Indeed, chickenhawks seem to be the dominant lifeform on this planet.
Yeah, because once people are too old to carry a rifle, they shouldn't have any opinions on foreign policy.
And because yeah, Putin will be carrying a rifle anytime soon.
You know nothing about VV Putin
Trivially simple guide to understanding Soros:
Govts should run maximum possible socialist parasite subsidy entitlement programs + earnings redistribution programs financed by marrow-sucking taxes on ordinary working people (so they remain poor & powerless) + endless govts debt (to ensure financial repression continues indefinitely), while letting social parasites like Soros keep all his financial engineering loot so he can erect himself as Financial Royalty & Social/Political Manipulator.
My response: send him to the guillotine.
Yes, BUT WOW do I ever hold the term "financial engineering" in contempt.
Engineering - real engineering - is a field of great responsibility and discipline. Engineers are licensed by States to "protect public health and safety". "Financial engineering" is NOT an engineering discipline, is NOT licensed by States, and appears to consist of inventing schemes for stealing money that are so complicated that they enable the self-styled "financial engineers" employers to steal a lot of money before everyone else can figure out quite what they are doing. And then hide the stealing behind the plausible denial that "what we were doing was so complicated that I never personally understood it - since, as you know, I myself am not a 'financial engineer' ".
It's like inventing the term "Social Science" to pretend that "social studies", which are real studies, are "science", which they are not.
I agree.
Signed
Engineer
The fact that anyone gives a shit what Soros or a banker thinks about global politics shows just how far over the edge we have gone. There will be a WW3. But it won't be the war Soros wants.
this is the Cold War on steroids, where's Ronnie Raygun, bet he could run up that deficit faster the all US pres since, and the EU
Well he could always go on a dinosaur and shoot Ruskies but he is dead so that won't happen. I'm sure Obozzo and Cuntion can finish the Cold War Deux and make it WWIII in a huffy just need Ms.Yellens allowance to increase
Soros may or may not be right about Putin, but he is definitely right about austerity. It is exactly the opposite of what is needed in Europe. There is no path to recovery through austerity.
There is no path to recovery through printing money either. The only path is the purge of bad debt.
whatever path...
austerity will outflank you
yuppers, we're getting robbed so nazi garbage can get bribed with social security to leave the country.
http://www.businessinsider.com/congresswoman-introducing-bill-to-stop-na...
All they're going to do is go to a superlab Mexico with that money.
They CAN get out, we're so not paying them?
And it will be violent.
Just trust my words on it.
I am SICK to death of t this STUPID country and it's STUPID racist beatnik warmongering draftdodging junkies abusing power to purposely fuck up MY life.
INCLUDING THE OBAMAS.
Victoria Nuland admitted to giving $5 billion to Neonazis in the Ukraine. And the Nazi garbage in Socal are thriving, Mexico's getting good subsidies for their habits.
If this does NOT stop? YES I will break somebody's neck.
You're not used to hearing that. But it needs to happen, these thugs are not entitled to what is not theirs and they will have to figure it out the hard way.
Go back to what you do best Soros.
You really want to hurt Putin? Why don't you try taking down his currency?
Fact is you're too long in the tooth and should take retirement. Putin might even loan you his dacha.
Soros is a pig.
Did Reichsfuhrer der SS Soros give this interview from deep inside his Berlin bunker?
The man is very obviously insane.
Soros writes exhaustively about Putin being a Pariah. In the entire lengthy article, he buries MH17 as almost an aside. How and why did the West go from outright blaming Putin for shooting the plane down, to just a tangential mention? This appears to be crafted to only imply Putin's culpability. Other than this innocuous reference, MH17 is essentially out of the news.
From the article:
Germany, as the main advocate of fiscal austerity, needs to understand the internal contradiction involved. Chancellor Angela Merkel has behaved as a true European with regard to the threat posed by Russia. She has been the foremost advocate of sanctions on Russia, and she has been more willing to defy German public opinion and business interests on this than on any other issue. Only after the Malaysian civilian airliner was shot down in July did German public opinion catch up with her.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrfKZUttEwE#t=18
What threat? You mean NATO surrounding Russia with bases, ships and missiles over the past 20 years, as per neocon and militarist-realist policy papers?
The airliner it looks like Kiev's junta regime shot down? Where's all that evidence implicating Russia we were promised?
Nazi whore Soros wants to get World War III started. Help Obama Kickstart World War III! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ
Playing the Nazi whore was George Soros' "The Happiest Time in My Life" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ2U6Rl98PM
Someone put a bullet in old cheese face.
Well now i ploughed through what must have been a slavering dribbling diatribe lasting a whole fucking day from this corrupt old fucking jewboy, or at lest the first hundred yards of this fucking shite, and nowhere, not one word not a single fucking syllable mentioned the fucking Kenyan faggoty cocksucker and arse bandit and his mincing minions causing this shite over a fucking oil pipeline and the depth and depravity of the other most reviled evil piece of shit on the planet , the fucking retarded Bidet sat next to Kenyan cock squatter, and trying to gift the Ukraine to the abortion called his son.
What a fucking waste of fucking moisture in your shriveled stinking carcass soros.
Go climb into a gas oven for fucks sake, I hear one is still running in Kiev that the Nazis rescued from Belsen foir your fat fat jew boy chum choco fucking clown.
George emerges from the shadows to tell us mear mortals to get with his program or else.
Things are not going to Georges plans, time to tell people straight up what they should think and do.
Talk to the hand George.
Guillotine for nazi scum Soros.
Guillotine for nazi scum Soros.
'Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain'
Here's what we do, George. We put the missle defense systems promised to Poland, et al, into place. I'm sure you would agree with that.
Soros, his tribe, and his cronies are the real existential threat
The last thing I saw from Ukraine was that they said they would pay Russia what was owed if Russia gave them more.
I'll gladly pay you for last week's hamburger if you give me this week's and next week's hamburger now.
The Chosenoligarchs are PARKED in Ukraine-and they would rather die than pay that bill.That's why all money given to them to pay it just disappears.Ukrainians get targeted by Psychos no matter where they live because they Work,Save and hoard GLD."Everybody knows that."
Who cares what Soros thinks... if oil prices stay low, Russia is toast.
Putin regime goons say they are breaking truce and starts slaughter by attacking Ukrainian cities
http://www.interfax.ru/world/403434
Remmber this:
1.) It's Putin regime goons that are in Ukraine attacking Ukranians - citizens and army. Here you can see Russian made tanks T-72B1 that are only in Russian army, with so called "seperatist" flags driving in city streets. Either it's Russia or Ukraine - both scenarious it prooves that Putin regime is attacking Ukranians using this banner of "seperatists". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d7m_Ua4wFo
2.) And in this Putin regime propoganda channel material failure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv39Lc5oSVs you can see & hear two things:
2.1.) It's "separatists" who are shooting to Ukraine army from civilian houses and than run away from them - knowing that they are provoking reply fire and in that way puting civilians under danger.
2.2.) As you can hear - they are saying that Ukraine army is shooting GRAD when actually you can hear GRAD but no explosions, that means that actually it's separatists who are shooting GRAD and not Ukraine army. So here you go - these are the ones who are bombarding houses.
3.) Russian soldier mother recieve information that their sons are dead during training or from heart attack. Those who recieve bodies can't look at them and must be burried during night and must keep silence. No honor to those man. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHE_2NTHGvo
4.) Ukranian people in order to show their honor and respect to those brave Ukranian soldiers who died when stand against Putin regime invasion - kneels and holds hands each other all the way through town.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMjl1euADEg
5.) Even when at city borders are Putine regime goons and attacking Ukranians - people stand together and to show their support to country & army they gather together and sing anthem.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PILstC9SfoY
< y a w n >
Tell it to the Hitler mural in your bedroom, you stupid shill.
Putin regime goons has started attacking ukranian civilians:
http://liveuamap.com/