This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The New Federation

Sprott Money's picture




 

Jeff Nielson for Sprott Money

 

In previous commentaries, readers have seen scoffs of derision with respect to (arguably) the two, most-important propaganda myths of the 21st century: the New Normal, and the New World Order. The gist of that criticism is that we rarely see anything truly “new” in our lives, in conceptual terms.

 

The declaration (through propaganda and/or disinformation) that we have two all-encompassing, new paradigms which supposedly comprise our current reality is patently ludicrous, on its surface. Context changes. Principles are immutable.

 

The “New Normal” is nothing but a lie of the Corporate media designed to (supposedly) justify the fact that the lives of the masses are getting steadily worse every day, while the lives of the Privileged get steadily better every day. The “New World Order” is nothing but a disinformation lie, spread through the Alternative Media, to cover-up the fact that our societies are currently ruled/dominated by an Old World Order – the same Old World Order which has been pulling the strings of our government for over a century.

 

Proof of this assertion comes in the form of a book. The Economic Pinch was written by Charles Lindbergh Sr. in 1924. Not to be confused with the famed aviator (who was his son); Lindbergh Sr. was a Republican Congressman, an unknown hero of his era. As noted in a previous piece; he is purported to have presented The Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892 to the U.S. Congress, some time between 1907 and 1917.

 

Lindbergh himself identifies the Old World Order which already ruled our societies in his era:

 

Shortly after the [American] Civil War a group of men formed a selfish plan to rule the world by the manipulation of finances.

profiteers

Regular readers are very familiar with this cabal which seeks to “rule the world by the manipulation of finances”, and know it today as the One Bank. Lindbergh labels the members of this cabal “profiteers”. Nearly 100 years ago; he warned the world of the current peril posed by the profiteers of this Old World Order:

 

So far as [the profiteers] go there is but one hope for them – not that they will save themselves – but that the people will take action to save the people from the impending peril of the super-wealthy gone wealth crazy.  [emphasis mine]

 

Lindbergh is very explicit that even in his own era, the economic oppression imposed by the psychopaths of the Old World Order was already worse than the oppression which existed in pre-Revolutionary times, when “the United States” was nothing but a colony of the British Empire.

 

If we take into account the conditions of the people, we see more injustice imposed by the profiteers and politicians of these times than is stated in the Declaration of Independence against the Imperial Government we were then under.

 

He is also explicitly clear that the U.S. “Two-Party Dictatorship” frequently described/alluded to in previous commentaries (and controlled by the Old World Order) was already a reality in his own era:

 

There is no material difference now in the old political parties, except which shall control patronage.

 

It is with the knowledge that “the New Normal” and “the New World Order” are nothing but propaganda fiction, and we are ruled by the same Old World Order today which ruled us 100 years ago, that we can look back to Lindbergh’s time (and Lindbergh himself) for “new ideas” on how we can fight back against this oppression.

 

The starting point here is to refer to Lindbergh’s own economic paradigm. He states that our societies are roughly broken down into Four Groups:

 

Diverse-Workers

 

a)    the Three Useful Groups

b)    the One Useless Group

profiteer

 

He describes the Three Useful Groups as the Farmer, the Wage Worker, and the Business group (what we would call today “small business”). Naturally the One Useless Group is the Profiteers, economic parasites who create/produce nothing themselves, but leech all of the wealth out of our societies to appease their own, insatiable greed.

 

Here Lindbergh identifies an economic truth which is oblivious to all of the charlatans of our own era who have the audacity to call themselves “economists”. He points out that the Three Useful Groups share strong, mutual interests. Specifically; it is in the best interests of each group that all Three Groups be prosperous.

 

If the Farmer is prosperous; he/she can produce abundant crops, at reasonable prices. If the Wage Worker is prosperous; he/she will tend to be well-educated, well-dressed, and a generally more productive employee. If the Small Business group is prosperous; it can hire more workers, or even pay its Wage Workers higher wages – which they will then spend buying the crops of the Farmer and the goods of the Small Businesses.

 

It is only the One Useless Group – the Profiteers – whose (selfish) interests are contrary to the interests of all other groups. Thus, he notes, the Three Useful Groups can/should/must unite, to collectively promote and represent their enormous mutual interests.

 

Already, in Lindbergh’s time; the Old World Order was heavily involved in divide-and-conquer politics. It continually attempted to drive political/economic wedges between these groups, in a never-ending effort to manufacture antagonism (or at least mistrust) between the Three Useful Groups.

 

Already, in Lindbergh’s time; there were independent associations of one form or another, by which the Three Useful Groups sought to separately promote their interests. But already, in Lindbergh’s time (just as we see today); these “associations” had been infiltrated and/or corrupted by the Old World Order. Thus not only were (are) those associations unsuccessful at collectively protecting the interests of the Three Useful Groups, they were (are) completely ineffectual in even representing their interests individually.

 

It was time, Lindbergh declared (in 1924), for a new idea, a new way of doing things: a New Federation. The Three Useful Groups uniting in a collective federation, to collectively promote their mutual interests, or (to steal a line from Alexandre Dumas) “One for all, and All for one”.

 

 

divide

It is because the Three Useful Groups have always sought to promote their interests separately that it has been so easy for the puppet-masters of the Old World Order to play their game of divide-and-conquer politics. Conversely, a larger, united Federation would/could not only do a better job of protecting the individual interests of the Three Useful Groups, it would also (for the first time) promote their collective interests.

 

In our own (corrupt) paradigm; it is only the One Useless Group which is united. Its vehicle for our political/economic oppression and the parasitic looting of our societies is the One Bank.

 

Standing against this political/economic oppression, on behalf of the Three Useful Groups? We have nothing. Our governments, our “representatives”, are nothing but paid stooges of the One Bank. Our (individual) associations which represent the Three Useful Groups are weak, ineffectual, and (often) corrupt as well.

 

With representation inside the political system now nothing but a hollow joke; the Three Useful Groups, who collectively represent the vast majority of our societies, need to organize themselves outside of the current, corrupt political framework. United we stand; divided we fall.

 

As acknowledged in numerous, previous commentaries; it is already far, far too late to prevent an economic “fall”, of monumental proportions. The One Bank, the Old World Order, has already crippled and hollowed-out our present economic system (and even our political/social infrastructure) to such a grievous extent with its systemic plundering that an economic Day of Reckoning is now inevitable.

 

What is of paramount importance as we approach this (inevitable) precipice is that control of our economies, governments, and societies no longer remain solely in the hands of the same cabal of psychopathic oligarchs who have nearly completed the destruction of the wealthiest, most prosperous societies our species has ever built.

 

We need the New Federation which Charles Lindbergh Sr. described/explained to us over 90 years ago. Not to protect the societies we have built, and the wealth we have amassed. The Old World Order has already destroyed and stolen that, respectively. We need a New Federation so that when these psychopaths have reduced our current system to nothing but rubble and ashes with their rapacious looting that we can rebuild something better in its place.

 

Jeff Nielson for Sprott Money

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 11/20/2014 - 17:25 | 5471134 TheGreatRecovery
TheGreatRecovery's picture

5 stars.  There have been people at every step warning that America would end up the way it has, but they have been outshouted at every step by the bankers, who of course put buying up the propaganda media at the top of their shopping lists of what to buy with the money-that banking-allows-them-to-create-out-of-thin-air and give to themselves.  It's as if the citizens have to compete against the forces-of-darkness who never have to work, never have to save, and never have to pay for anything.  How could citizens ever possibly win such a contest?  Noone could.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 17:24 | 5471128 Czar of Defenes...
Czar of Defenestration's picture

Meh.

DEAR AUTHOR...WHAT OF THE PERSON who *was* one of the "usefuls" for years,

but now lives off the interest from all that was saved-and-invested over the years?!?

According to Lindbergh, that's "useless."

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 17:19 | 5471107 messystateofaffairs
messystateofaffairs's picture

When I was young, before I knew what a libertarian was, I joined my countries Chamber of Commerce to save my country from cronyism and politicians. I learned that the biggest ass kissing wannabe cronies were in the small business sector and were more interested in using their position to curry personal favor to overcome their business competition rather than use 10% of their personal work energy to create an environment where the 90% of work would bear much more fruit. While they were busy stabbing me in the back the entrenched old buzzards in the Chamber picked me out to become president. A friend told me that with my views it would become the charge of the light brigade. I agreed and ran for my life and never looked at any kind of public service again. Politics is in everything, even a fishing club or townhouse association. Politics is born in the person of every one of us, and the shittiest soul selling ones rise to the top. Years later I discovered the existence of Austrian economics and learned I was not the only person in the world with these kinds of thoughts. It would be some kind of nirvana if the productive sector could get together and ram a free market agenda down the parasites throats. But producers are people and they have the political something for nothing shit lurking inside, waiting to get out when the climate is right. Until more people wake up about what freedom really is do-gooder freedom fighters are going to end up martyrs. Jesus Christ done did that already, that kind of thing is not for my level of creature. For my part I preach a little to those who care to listen about what freedom is, let the parasites fuck the sheeple till they can't take it anymore and start to run around in the street with their hair on fire, and try not to have my hair on fire until the level of slavery abates somewhat due to some kind of repeat and rinse half assed rebellion. But the authors sentiments are wonderful, I have them myself, now if we could just find somebody with the skills and talents to pull that rabbit out of the hat.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 17:28 | 5471152 TheGreatRecovery
TheGreatRecovery's picture

Excellent post.  Thank you.  The scum always rises to the top.  In every City, the Chamber of Commerce is the most potent source of theft and slavery.  Machiavelli didn't invent this; he just wrote it down.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 16:31 | 5470905 BeetleBailey
BeetleBailey's picture

Forex Kong – A LOUSY SERVICE AND A THIEF

This is to warn EVERYONE as to doing any sort of business with Forex Trading with Kong, or what ever he/she/it bills itself. I signed up to the “service” in May of 2014, and once on the site, the person proclaiming themselves to be Kong was in a maelstrom of trades – all currently down. I found his combination of ranting about the markets, along with fuzzy and not explained or thought out trades was amateur at best. In fact, as a veteran trader, I took each and every trade of his on one of my demo accounts, with this “Kong” not spelling out as to whether trades he emailed on “alert” were short, mid or long term, and the ensuing results were hilarious. ALL down. I have the charts, and alerts he/she/it sent and the times  he/she/it sent them, and to say this “service” is even competent is a stretch.

I’d be happy to share these charts, trades ( I took screen shots of the demo account with the idiot Kong trades getting reamed) with anyone.

The REAL “fun” started when I canceled – or attempted to cancel, my less than one month old account with Kong. First, to sign up to the…service, I had to join PayPal, which I did NOT want to do. This Kong character cajoled me into doing so “It’s the only way I work” – something to that effect.

WELL…Kong and PayPal kept right on debiting me. I caught them. Kept right debiting me AFTER I CAUGHT THEM.

I have the emails, bank statements – all of it. The good thieves at Forex Trading with Kong know this, and can not refute one iota of what I wrote. They are arrogant, claim they “never had a refund” (gee…I guess so).

STAY AWAY FROM FOREX TRADING WITH KONG. BE FOREWARNED.

THE SERVICE IS ASININE, AND THEY STEAL YOUR MONEY.

JPHFOREX at Gmail dot com….I can back up everything I just wrote.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:46 | 5470720 Madcow
Madcow's picture

Once there was a probelm with an occasional bout of fraud and corruption. Now, we've moved into a new era that is fraud-only. We're buidlnig a new global economy built exclusivly upon fraud and market maipulation. And the "regulators" don't even try to discourage taht notion. So to younger generations, i counsel that if you want to get a head - you need to start committing crime now.  Knock off a liquor store.  Steal money from your parents. Push a dog in front of a moving car. Because eventually - the Govermemtn will only tolerate people who are known criminals and who can prove that they've committed a number of serious crimes.  To become a politician, banker or financial regulator - you will need to work your way up to raping and killling prostitues and stuffing them into suitcases. Its all part of progress.  What the bankers call "Gods work."   So FORWARD: to a totalitarian police state run by sociopaths and sex criminals.  So get out there and start raping and killing people - else Gov-Co might think you're a "terrorist."

 

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 16:17 | 5470845 Seer
Seer's picture

"the Govermemtn will only tolerate people who are known criminals"

The wealthy come up with all sorts of tricks to stay on top.  One of those tricks is to convince us that we need a government: and of course, once there's that "accepted" throne of power it will ONLY be the wealthy who control it (and wield it against all others).  Don't you know, power corrupts!

Lastly, it's the same story as it's always been.  Only thing different here is that there is no longer enough bread to keep people distracted: resource depletion means that more deception is necessary to make us think that it's not happening, since as shortages appear it will be the wealthy that will find themselves having to actually work to survive.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:30 | 5470664 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

Fantastic article, and important information.

An American, not US subject.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 16:13 | 5470826 SMG
SMG's picture

Agreed excellent!   I hope we can build something better.   It will only work if people understand what has been done to them and who did it.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 14:20 | 5470422 Minnalousha
Minnalousha's picture

You are forbidden from using parentheticals ever again.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:38 | 5470697 donsluck
donsluck's picture

Harsh parenthetical punishment dude. How about, say, 5 articles?

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 17:16 | 5471095 Minnalousha
Minnalousha's picture

Yeah.You're right.

I was feeling frisky....

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 14:07 | 5470375 limacon
limacon's picture

Walking away and making it stick is new .

You are about 3 times richer than you think .

See

https://www.academia.edu/9405720/The_Economics_of_Disrespect_Update_I

or

http://andreswhy.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-economics-of-disrespect-update...

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:38 | 5470247 geno-econ
geno-econ's picture

Kissinger recently said we need a New World Order referring to the political situation with EU, Russia and China. Obviously, we also need a New World Economic System if we are not to repeat a World wide depression similar to the 1920s

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 17:19 | 5471102 TheGreatRecovery
TheGreatRecovery's picture

I hope that is sarcasm.  It appears to me that we do have a new world economic system and that it has caused the current worldwide depression.  The EU appears to be just another fancy way for the bankers to loot more countries.  As for Russian and China, how about if we just left them alone, since we can't even manage ourselves.  I think that's what George Washington did - left them alone.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:54 | 5470319 Seer
Seer's picture

A depression HAS to happen in order to clear debts and reset valuations.  It's got nothing to do with what I want, but everything to do with what is necessary (to get us back closer to reality).

Interesting that Kissinger mentioned that the  West should refrain from pushing Ukraine toward NATO.

In the end no structure is going to really change the fundamental problem of basing our resource distributions on the improbable notion that they are infinite (on our finite planet).  There's increasing vocalizations about global growth dying down, and on this point I can say that it's a start toward admitting that there's a problem (with our growth paradigm).

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:29 | 5470201 Comte d'herblay
Comte d'herblay's picture

Seeing as how most of the human beans on this planet cannot control themselves, much less say, rule their famly of two parents and three kids with any degree of competence, due to a combination of benign or malign neglect, ignorance of what constitutes good and effective parentling, how can anyone reasonably expect good national, state, local governance?

The long term consequences, highly predictable as fact, though somewhat chaotic in terms of time, of any act are at work no matter what we do or do not do.

Did the Brennan Court  think that when women were given the right to kill their children legally b 4 the third term that 50,000,000 abortions and counting in 40 years would take place, with 90% of them in happening in the caucasian community only -----a trend that makes whites now the fastest growing minority in the world?  

The die is cast and que sera, sera. 

See y'all on the other side. 

 

 

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:37 | 5470690 donsluck
donsluck's picture

Coincident with the declining crime rate. Maybe we don't want unwanted children.

Fri, 11/21/2014 - 10:59 | 5473612 TheReplacement
TheReplacement's picture

Then stop making them.  Abortion is murder AND creates economic waste.  Only the most selfish pigs would do it.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:46 | 5470200 Comte d'herblay
Comte d'herblay's picture

damned short term mammary...

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:18 | 5470150 basho
basho's picture

'Shortly after the [American] Civil War a group of men formed a selfish plan to rule the world by the manipulation of finances. '

none of the clowns had names, right?

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:06 | 5470090 Johnbrown
Johnbrown's picture

If history is taking us somewhere new, where specifically is it going? What is the ultimate end or purpose of history? The study of the answers to this question is called teleology. Teleology deals with “ultimate purpose”, and it is the intersection between a person’s theory of history, and his theology. If a person believes history has an ultimate purpose, by implication, he believes there is some consciousness designing it. Religious people call this ultimate designer God. But a person can believe there is a purpose to history, without believing in God. He can believe that human beings are the designers of the future. History, from this perspective, is the cumulative agglomeration of billions of purposeful minds, each working to bring about their own vision of the future. Each answering the question:

Where do we want to go?

http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/18852-world-anarch-or-a-world-stat...

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:35 | 5470683 donsluck
donsluck's picture

"We" white man? First you postulate that the future is determined by billions of seperate wants. Then you ask "where do we want to go?" Since "where" is singular, the answer is nowhere.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 16:46 | 5470957 Johnbrown
Johnbrown's picture

Did you actually read the article?

No, you didn't.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:45 | 5470714 Seer
Seer's picture

Thanks for helping to keep logic here.  I wince whenerver I hear people start talking about what everyone/others should do.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:46 | 5470289 Seer
Seer's picture

"Where do we want to go?"

That's kind of a loaded question.  "Wants" are secondary to "needs."  And "needs," the fundamental ones, are related to the physical world, the one which is finite, the one in which we are "wanting" to operate as though it's infinite.

The limiting factor will ALWAYS be that of available resources (from our finite planet).

All of our Systems are meant to provide structure for extracting and utilizing the earth's resources.  Yes, some Systems are highly questionable, but ALL, those that rely on the notion of perpetual growth (I have yet to hear of any others) will ultimately fail in the face of declining resources (brought on by the quest for perpetual growth).

Human hubris and deception.  We're pretty good about using them to deny actual reality.

The patterns are undeniable (though Glubb himself managed to miss it- he did document the patterns quite clearly though):

http://www.newworldeconomics.com/archives/2014/092814.html (link to PDF is there)

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 12:58 | 5470060 Otto Zitte
Otto Zitte's picture

The cabal created the league of nations and the UN, and waged all the wars since 1913 to dominate the planet.

Iran did not reverse engineer a crashed drone. They got it and all the required support systems & training through the UN.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 12:54 | 5470032 beaglebog
beaglebog's picture

There have only ever been two ways to make a living.

 

Do productive work ... OR ... exploit the productivity of others.

 

Politics is the ultimate refinement of the latter.

 

The less-refined turn to open theft and fraud ... clearly criminal behaviour.

 

  The politician practises both theft and fraud; whilst whispering that he loves you.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:30 | 5470668 donsluck
donsluck's picture

Politics is the execution of policy. Policy is what guides society. There would be no society without politicians. The political problem we have today is the two party illusion. Don't vote red or blue.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 14:07 | 5470372 Seer
Seer's picture

Happens in "nature" as well: Google/search "brood parasites."  Um, well... and humans are OF nature.

As soon as you allow for gods and masters you enable these kinds of folks.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 12:40 | 5469991 no more banksters
no more banksters's picture

"All these scenarios, however, could also make neocons even more anxious to impose their lunatic plans to provoke a general conflict with Russia as the only alternative against the dramatic shift of the global geopolitical balance, unless we see a fast creation of a corresponding political power in the US inspired by the European Left. It would be even better if such a power could rise from the movements in the streets (Occupy movement, etc.), like Podemos in Spain."

http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2014/11/basic-reasons-for-which-us-de...

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 16:10 | 5470816 mccvilb
mccvilb's picture

The problem with OWS is the people in the vanguard don't understand what they're protesting. They only know who's responsible and that they have no voice. We need real leadership from people who not only understand the ramifications in the fiat system of a debt-driven economy and the inherent corruption in a stock market regulated by the very same people operating it, but also are prepared to govern without any benefit to themselves.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 13:09 | 5470108 Paveway IV
Paveway IV's picture

"...It would be even better if such a power could rise from the movements in the streets (Occupy movement, etc.), like Podemos in Spain..."

Never gonna happen. The FBI and NSA are all over that shit. Whatever they miss, the DHS Stazi will clean up with hollow-points.

Smart money is on the dramatic shift of global geopolitical balance.

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 14:04 | 5470350 Seer
Seer's picture

Yup.

Folks can find out all about it by doing a Google on "Gladio B."  Here's a place to start:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tK7yI23AWE

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 15:43 | 5470705 Seer
Seer's picture

WTF?  A downarrow for fucking what?

ZH, it's really starting to attract a lot of retards these days...

Thu, 11/20/2014 - 17:48 | 5471226 Utah_Get_Me_2
Utah_Get_Me_2's picture

The idiot who thinks that the "Occupy" movement was an organic uprising of the disenfranchised and not funded, agitated, infiltrated and co-opted by the Feds 'downarrowed' it. Because he is a moron that believes socialism will actually work if a bunch of misinformed, idealogues wearing Guy Fawkes masks were running the show.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!