If you're going to make an omlet, you've gotta crack a few eggs. Or in this case, chollas. Besides, I've had too many cholla needles in my leg to really like them that much. They're just as prickly as Hillary's personality.
Ha! Just came over from facebook, where I saw a post about the other bill; the cosby one. I was thinking almost the same thing as this post. I was wondering what the number of women assaulted has to be to make the assaulter a bad guy? clinton - 5 or 6. Great guy! Ah that bill!! cosby - 16 or whatever. evil bastard... now we DEFINITELY cant listen to him rant about black people accepting personal responsibility in their lives...
Clinton assaulted 5 or 6 women?? Yeah, maybe in a good month. More like 500 would be my guess. The Arkansas State Troopers had a full time detail handling his rapes.
Meet the Horn-dogs. Its a new reaity show. Watch from the front row as they screw every thing. In the pilot show it starts with the stars cleaning house.
I often wondered why his son was killed while changing a tire. The father has now become the epidemy of his political correctness warfare. Liberal maggots are cash strapped and need money. What a sick world the US educational department has created/breed. No wonder why you need police to walk within the halls of building future minds. It's a prison system, groping on government assistance.
‘I brought you into this world , and will take you out.’ - Cosby Show.
I don't know how you knew but that's my ambient soundscape sleep music. I give you permission to share. Try it Zero's you will sleep like you never have before. Try it. Just once.
Would suprise me in the least if the moron voters elected that cackling cunt! The republicant's will most likely run some a-hole like Jeb Bush. Amerikans love them some big gubmint!
Makes no difference who gets elected. Only those that pay obeisance to their - our - overlords in Tel Aviv and the Fed have a chance of a nomination. The serfs can then amuse themselves by selecting one of the two anointed ones.
She can take it. Remember that time she was gettin' off the choppa? She was under gunfauxire. She will be a great con-petty-tor. If anything Fauxcahauntus is out of her league, amateurs and professionals and all.
For those in the know: Obama is really a CIA tool and neo-con manchurian president. One of his mandates is to destroy the left from within, and dishearten the sheeple-left, while reinvigorating the sheeple-right.
As such, the next president WILL be an openly neo-con tool, not a Pentagon tool of the left like H. Clinton is.
H. Clinton is just more bait to fuel the anger of the sheeple-right for 2016 and prepare the way for one party rule by the neo-cons.
Watch for it.
An American, not US subject.
Watch for the coming homosexual/morality scandal against Obama that is coming.
The elites are, like the mafia, NOT a homogenous group, there are at least two main factions.
One of the main factions expresses power via the CIA, founded by CONgress in1947 by Truman. The other expresses power via the Pentagon. They both, all, owe allegiance to the Rothschild banksters, but that is another story.
One of the first conflicts between the two resulted in the Pentagon having its root MI-8/Sig-Intel departments Unconstitutionally formed into the NSA by Truman in 1952 so as to be able to better compete with the independent CIA.
If one goes back to the Pentagon Papers, one can actually see the tit for tat battles that the two have waged ever since. They cooperate from time to time, like the mob, but then fall out over the growing strength of one over the other and the division of the spoils. Bush Jr. became co-opted by the Pentagon wing, which was then sent packing after CIA-Obama was placed in the Oval Office (McChrystal, Petraeus).
The CIA put their guy, Nixon (Research his Bush, CIA, and JFK coup pedigree), into the White House in 1968, and so the Pentagon wing of power created the Trilateral Commission in 1973 and then got their guy, Carter, into the Oval Office in 1976. Bush Sr. was supposed to be in the Oval Office in 1980, but was trumped by the last somewhat independent president, Reagan.
With a little research, one will find that Clinton was buds with CIA-Bush Sr. and up to his eyebrows in not only whores, but also Iran-Contra--he is a CIA tool (Research Barry Seal).
As for CIA-Obama, check out his grandparents, mother, real father Frank Davis Marchall, USAID, and why his supposed daddy was brought to the US in the first place.
Then there is Libya. The CIA took over Libya and started running weapons to take down Egypt and then on to Syria. Problem is, Mubarak is/was the Pentagon's main guy in the Middle East, and Egypt is their main power base there as well. So the Pentagon needed to remove the CIA's new guy in Egypt, and protect their other main squeeze, Assad, in Syria. First, the weapons pipeline from Libya needed shutdown, and so it was. Afterward the Pentagon was able to install another guy in Egypt beholden to them, and thwart the CIA's efforts in Syria.
Why is it important? Because it brings clarity to some of what is going on, and explains a few things as well.
The rivalry is one reason the CIA has had to build an elaborate force, ISIS, and hoax, the beheadings, in Syria.
So, we now can better understand what is really going on in the US' strategic, nuke, commands. We can also expect a response by the Pentagon to stop those moves. Hagel's recent comments about the "state" of the US' strategic command make more sense against the above backdrop.
It is no different than many's observations that the the two parties work for the same interest groups, masters. Those same people could then accurately predict who Obamacare was really going to benefit, and then also predict that the Repubs.', and TeaParty's, exhortations of "repeal," etc., were laughable.
Once one sees and understands, things become clear, and predictable.
I could go on, but I think you get the main point.
As for CIA-Obama, I have been predicting since BEFORE the 2008 election that his presidency would follow the same trajectory as Clinton's. As such I predicted that starting in the summer, or so, of 2014 his presidency would see the supposedly "friendly" press turn on him, and then the scandals mount. The NSA scandal is not included, as it is something else. Currently that is exactly what is happening. More and more "critical" press on subjects not covered before.
Some would say that this is because he is now "lame-duck," but the nature of the coming scandals will be the "tell."
Go back and look at the summer of 1998, when the supposedly "friendly" press turned on Clinton and then he was wrapped up in the Lewinsky "moral" scandal." This will happen to CIA-Obama, he will be more and more embroiled in scandals that outrage the neo-con leaning, evangelical Christian, sheeple-right: Law an order, immigration, anti-Israel, morality, etc. His masters will cause scandals in the military that will be used to undermine his administration, but then will really be disguised purges of those commanders, leaders, not as Zionist friendly as is desired.
The big one will be the coming homosexual scandal.
Yeah, I know it sounds "tin-foil hat" like, but watch for it, and when it comes...
Fuck Bill's wife in the ass with a cactus.
Why do you hate the cactus so much??
If you're going to make an omlet, you've gotta crack a few eggs. Or in this case, chollas. Besides, I've had too many cholla needles in my leg to really like them that much. They're just as prickly as Hillary's personality.
This is a beyond stupid article. Perhaps you confused Business Intelligence (sic) with Zerohedge.?
i thought he was talking about Bill Cosby ... republicans hard at work ... starting early it looks like ...
Wow. Nothing gets by THIS guy.
You realize he's probably a paid shill yes?
You realize he's more likely a garden variety dumbass, yes?
@ El Vaquero
They must be less prickly than her legs though.
It's clear you are not running for public office.
Ha! Just came over from facebook, where I saw a post about the other bill; the cosby one. I was thinking almost the same thing as this post. I was wondering what the number of women assaulted has to be to make the assaulter a bad guy? clinton - 5 or 6. Great guy! Ah that bill!! cosby - 16 or whatever. evil bastard... now we DEFINITELY cant listen to him rant about black people accepting personal responsibility in their lives...
There is one other significant difference between the two Bills, as pertains to the Democratic party.
One is white (great guy).
One is black (evil bastard).
Despite what Democrats say, there are no gray areas.
Clinton assaulted 5 or 6 women?? Yeah, maybe in a good month. More like 500 would be my guess. The Arkansas State Troopers had a full time detail handling his rapes.
Yeah, I was just going off the top of my head. He was/is a class "A" creep. Ashamed to say I voted for him. It was before my journey to awareness.
We're going to need a bigger cactus.
Moar pricks! ~Hillary
Well done...
I blew some jack & coke when I read these....
Sideways.
But...but...but Cosby didn't marry a lesbian.
Well, BC seems (overly) straight. But HOW do you know 'bout his wife ?-)
Cosby married a dude.
cosby fuck childs.
nothing for himself,
1) black
2) pedofucker.
so did Obama
As I read somewhere else: Power corrupts. Absolute power makes you horny.
I must be master of the universe!
i believe that was lord action.
Clinton’s wife was the breadwinner ahead of his run for the Oval Office.
More likely the conduit for quid-pro-quo payoffs.
isn't she dead broke?
She was. But she preyed and preyed and preyed some more. Then there was a miracle. She's no longer dead or broke.
Don't you just love happy endings?
I'm waiting for Whoopi Goldberg, sitting with her feet firmly planted on the ground and legs apart to say,
Well, it's not
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape,rape
rape,rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape
rape, rape!
Meet the Horn-dogs. Its a new reaity show. Watch from the front row as they screw every thing. In the pilot show it starts with the stars cleaning house.
I often wondered why his son was killed while changing a tire. The father has now become the epidemy of his political correctness warfare. Liberal maggots are cash strapped and need money. What a sick world the US educational department has created/breed. No wonder why you need police to walk within the halls of building future minds. It's a prison system, groping on government assistance.
‘I brought you into this world , and will take you out.’ - Cosby Show.
Listen Zero's.
Listen, it's toon time Bitchez!
True. It's also a false positive. Winks.
Do you have a toon bot notifying you each time? And do you "Listen" Zero?
"Listen" in a forum is simply stupid
Listen MsBehaving.
This little Zero listens and listens well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seKaU-qQuts
40 seconds is all i could take
views so far: 98,394
Listen.
I don't know how you knew but that's my ambient soundscape sleep music. I give you permission to share. Try it Zero's you will sleep like you never have before. Try it. Just once.
listen, techno-brahmin, here's a youtube vid, it's a rotating fractal along with falling tone sound, in a loop for 10 hours:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9VMfdG873E
it has 741,000 views, and i like it.
What Bill did (either one) was nothing compared to the raping of the USA by TPTB and their puppets, like Barry.
or compared to the Euro pedophiles....daily average of missing kids at all the Disney Worlds is two a day????
Would suprise me in the least if the moron voters elected that cackling cunt! The republicant's will most likely run some a-hole like Jeb Bush. Amerikans love them some big gubmint!
Makes no difference who gets elected. Only those that pay obeisance to their - our - overlords in Tel Aviv and the Fed have a chance of a nomination. The serfs can then amuse themselves by selecting one of the two anointed ones.
the problem isn't where the two parties disagree, it's where they agree.
The rapist's spouse won't have a chance against Fauxcahauntus.
She can take it. Remember that time she was gettin' off the choppa? She was under gunfauxire. She will be a great con-petty-tor. If anything Fauxcahauntus is out of her league, amateurs and professionals and all.
Well, if it came down to holding their booze, Killery all the way!
For those in the know: Obama is really a CIA tool and neo-con manchurian president. One of his mandates is to destroy the left from within, and dishearten the sheeple-left, while reinvigorating the sheeple-right.
As such, the next president WILL be an openly neo-con tool, not a Pentagon tool of the left like H. Clinton is.
H. Clinton is just more bait to fuel the anger of the sheeple-right for 2016 and prepare the way for one party rule by the neo-cons.
Watch for it.
An American, not US subject.
Watch for the coming homosexual/morality scandal against Obama that is coming.
"neo-con tool, not a Pentagon tool"
So are you suggesting the Pentagon and the neocons are on different sides?
Surely not....
Yes.
The elites are, like the mafia, NOT a homogenous group, there are at least two main factions.
One of the main factions expresses power via the CIA, founded by CONgress in1947 by Truman. The other expresses power via the Pentagon. They both, all, owe allegiance to the Rothschild banksters, but that is another story.
One of the first conflicts between the two resulted in the Pentagon having its root MI-8/Sig-Intel departments Unconstitutionally formed into the NSA by Truman in 1952 so as to be able to better compete with the independent CIA.
If one goes back to the Pentagon Papers, one can actually see the tit for tat battles that the two have waged ever since. They cooperate from time to time, like the mob, but then fall out over the growing strength of one over the other and the division of the spoils. Bush Jr. became co-opted by the Pentagon wing, which was then sent packing after CIA-Obama was placed in the Oval Office (McChrystal, Petraeus).
The CIA put their guy, Nixon (Research his Bush, CIA, and JFK coup pedigree), into the White House in 1968, and so the Pentagon wing of power created the Trilateral Commission in 1973 and then got their guy, Carter, into the Oval Office in 1976. Bush Sr. was supposed to be in the Oval Office in 1980, but was trumped by the last somewhat independent president, Reagan.
With a little research, one will find that Clinton was buds with CIA-Bush Sr. and up to his eyebrows in not only whores, but also Iran-Contra--he is a CIA tool (Research Barry Seal).
As for CIA-Obama, check out his grandparents, mother, real father Frank Davis Marchall, USAID, and why his supposed daddy was brought to the US in the first place.
Then there is Libya. The CIA took over Libya and started running weapons to take down Egypt and then on to Syria. Problem is, Mubarak is/was the Pentagon's main guy in the Middle East, and Egypt is their main power base there as well. So the Pentagon needed to remove the CIA's new guy in Egypt, and protect their other main squeeze, Assad, in Syria. First, the weapons pipeline from Libya needed shutdown, and so it was. Afterward the Pentagon was able to install another guy in Egypt beholden to them, and thwart the CIA's efforts in Syria.
Why is it important? Because it brings clarity to some of what is going on, and explains a few things as well.
The rivalry is one reason the CIA has had to build an elaborate force, ISIS, and hoax, the beheadings, in Syria.
So, we now can better understand what is really going on in the US' strategic, nuke, commands. We can also expect a response by the Pentagon to stop those moves. Hagel's recent comments about the "state" of the US' strategic command make more sense against the above backdrop.
It is no different than many's observations that the the two parties work for the same interest groups, masters. Those same people could then accurately predict who Obamacare was really going to benefit, and then also predict that the Repubs.', and TeaParty's, exhortations of "repeal," etc., were laughable.
Once one sees and understands, things become clear, and predictable.
I could go on, but I think you get the main point.
An American, not US subject.
As for CIA-Obama, I have been predicting since BEFORE the 2008 election that his presidency would follow the same trajectory as Clinton's. As such I predicted that starting in the summer, or so, of 2014 his presidency would see the supposedly "friendly" press turn on him, and then the scandals mount. The NSA scandal is not included, as it is something else. Currently that is exactly what is happening. More and more "critical" press on subjects not covered before.
Some would say that this is because he is now "lame-duck," but the nature of the coming scandals will be the "tell."
Go back and look at the summer of 1998, when the supposedly "friendly" press turned on Clinton and then he was wrapped up in the Lewinsky "moral" scandal." This will happen to CIA-Obama, he will be more and more embroiled in scandals that outrage the neo-con leaning, evangelical Christian, sheeple-right: Law an order, immigration, anti-Israel, morality, etc. His masters will cause scandals in the military that will be used to undermine his administration, but then will really be disguised purges of those commanders, leaders, not as Zionist friendly as is desired.
The big one will be the coming homosexual scandal.
Yeah, I know it sounds "tin-foil hat" like, but watch for it, and when it comes...
An American, not US subject.
You have to wade through a pile of junk comments these days to get to thoughtful and genuine comments as these.
"50 years of deep state" by Mark Gorton how accurate? It's worth a read in any event.
you think they're going to try and declare the budget got balanced, too? hahaha
You win the Nobel prize for creative novelty. A serious question: Did you dream this up yourself, or did somebody else?
bill's problem is he likes white women. bill's excuse is he likes ugly white women with big lips so everyone thinks he did them a favor.
Maybe the Washington Post can run a "fact check" on the cartoon!
bring out the coconspirator's choice, jeb "the hedge" bush. let the games begin.
the fools have already begun appearing here to bare their prelubed asses for the taking, red and blue, bleeding and bruised and loving every minute.
Now, that would be some scum-back.
Clinton and Lewinski have shown,
What Kaczynski must surely have known,
That an intern is better,
Than a bomb in a letter,
When deciding how best to be blown.
- some clever guy.