This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
17 States Sue Obama Over "Unconstitutional" Executive Action On Immigration
A year ago, following the whole Supreme Court farce, a bevy of states proved there are more than just "idiot voters" left in the US, when they decided to sue Obamacare outright over one or more of its provisions. They were promptly shut down by a judicial system that is as corrupt as the government itself (needless to say, both working at the behest of their true financial puppetmaster: Wall Street). And yet, in the aftermath of the now epic fiasco that is Obamacare, and not to mention the violent reaction to the administration as demonstrated in the midterm elections, the president may have a tougher time to brush away the next round of adverse reactions against his latest hugely unpopular executive order, one involving the amnesty of over 5 million illegal immigrants.
According to AP, Texas is leading a 17-state coalition in suing over the Obama administration's recently announced executive actions on immigration.
While many top Republicans have denounced Obama's unilateral illegal immigration clemency move designed to spare as many as 5 million people living illegally in the United States from deportation, or, as some put it, win the democrats 5 million heretofore non-existing voters, earlier today Texas Gov.-elect Greg Abbott took it a step further Wednesday, filing a lawsuit in federal court in the Southern District of Texas. And once he did, the seal broke and everyone wanted in on the action, and Texas was quickly joined by 16 other, mostly southern and Midwestern states, including Alabama, Georgia, Idaho and Indiana.
Abbott argued Wednesday that Obama's action "tramples" portions of the U.S. Constitution. Which, let's be honest here, never stopped the "constitutional scholar" before.
The lawsuit raises three objections: that Obama violated the "Take Care Clause" of the U.S. Constitution that limits the scope of presidential power; that the federal government violated rulemaking procedures; and that the order will "exacerbate the humanitarian crisis along the southern border, which will affect increased state investment in law enforcement, health care and education."
To be sure this won't be the first time Texas and Obama don't see eye to eye. Or last. Wednesday's announcement marks the 31st time the attorney general in this fiercely conservative state has brought action against the federal government since Obama took office in 2009. The only other high-profile lawsuit against the immigration action has come on behalf of Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
House Majority Leader John Boehner told lawmakers this week that the GOP-led House may vote to undo Obama's executive action, but the move would be mostly symbolic, as Obama would certainly veto such legislation and the Democratic-led Senate would go for it, either.
Abbott wasn't alone: Potential 2016 presidential candidate and current Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who leaves office in January, also spoke out against the executive order earlier Wednesday, saying it could trigger a new flood of people pouring across the Texas-Mexico border. Perry and Abbott also have said the order will promote a culture of lawlessness.
Perry said at a news conference that Obama's 2012 executive order delaying the deportation of children brought into the U.S. illegally by their parents triggered an unprecedented wave of unaccompanied minors and families, mostly from Central America, crossing into the U.S. this summer.
"In effect, his action placed a neon sign on our border, assuring people that they could ignore the law of the United States," said Perry, who has deployed up to 1,000 National Guard troops to the border.
The federal lawsuit involves the following states: Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
Then again, one may wonder about the theatricality of all of the above: if republicans were truly fed up with the authoritarian head of the republic, they would just impeach him and be done with it. The fact that despite the howls of displeasure they have yet to do anything substantive, once again merely shows that both democrats and republicans are merely two all too eager parties on the receiving end of kickbacks by what we earlier dubbed, the world's biggest organized crime syndicate.
All those who want to get to the bottom of corruption in America, are urged to focus on Wall Street first, foremost, and only. Everything else is nickel and diming smoke and mirrors.
- 10671 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -



Sue? I expect a few rifles will be required for real change.
#LawyersWinning!
The following postulate seems to void the plaintiffs’ grievances:
“2. This lawsuit is not about immigration. It is about the rule of law, presidential power, and the structural limits of the U.S. Constitution.”
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/files/epress/files/20141203Immigrat...
As stated before and viewed from a legal perspective, immigration directives issued by DHS (i.e. Johnson memos) apparently cannot be reviewed by the courts – Judicial Review may not apply to this situation. Let’s also reiterate that immigration is not a civil affair per se, instead it is governed by Admiralty Law – registration of aliens.
Willful ignorance displayed by members of Congress, State officials and the political class while dealing with the immigration issue is an irrefutable evidence of constituents’ stupidity (specifically those who are fervidly opposed to any sort of temporary relief granted by the Executive Branch to certain unlawfully present immigrants) and excoriating the current President on immigration is not going to elevate their brutish status.
Perhaps these “pseudo mathematical expressions” may help:
Executive Order = Legal definition
Executive Order IS NOT Executive Action
Executive Action IS NOT Legal definition
Executive Action = DHS memorandum
DHS memorandum > Judicial review
Judicial review = Legal definition
The 2nd American Civil War is upon us.
http://www.barefootsworld.net/admiralty.html
info on admirality law
Uh what about Title eight and the Walter-McCarran, Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952? In order to enter the U.S. you need a visa and the number of visas that are permitted to be disbursed are limited by law. By deferring prosecution, even for humanitarian purposes, you are violating these laws. Go back to Daily Kos and come up with some better arguments, ya Bastard!!!!!
Twaddle. Translated: An authoritarian court said that a rancid demagogue can make rules, so why not tell every poor person on the planet that whitey will be their tax donkeys, come on in? End of country, thanks to a court order? Not the way it works. Naked tyranny is just that, no matter how stupid your explanation for it.
I'm gonna sue you, Oblamo!
Whatever, just another shadow puppet show to appease the yokels, while their entire Nation is stolen right in front of their eyes.
Yep. If the states were serious, they would just declare Obama's E.O. Unconstitutional and ignore it and continue to arrest and deport illegal aliens.(The few states that WERE deporting anyway...)
For those of you waiting for salvation at the hands of a politician, here is a news flash. Change starts from the grass roots level. The renaissance was not initiated by a politician, nor was the reformation. We are all, each and everyone of us incredibly powerful spiritual beings. We can change reality. We must take action and stop waiting for political salvation which I can promise you will never arrive.
The USA is a joke country. Sen. Mike Lee of Utah (R) has a way for the House to stop Obama but they are all cowards and co-conspirators.
The Military is also a joke. They want more war with the fake ISIS that McCain does photo ops with.
The military doesnt want more war, the munitions manufacturers do.
The state legislators would better spend their time calling for an Article V state run constitutional convention at which their representatives can propose, and the legislators can later ratify amendments to the Constitution that drastically restrict, or even terminate the federal government. A very powerful tool that they have yet to use since the original adoption of the Constitution. Seems like it better be now. Later will clearly be too late.
It's funny that calls for a Constitutional Covention are so frequently met with obections that the process would be open to runaway political actions that would destroy the country.
From my perspective, most of what was worthwhile about the USA has already been destroyed by runaway politics, and that a new Convention, or some other scary "radical" step, is the only possible way to salvage what once worked pretty well....
At this point, there's damn little left to lose.
hahahahahaha.... in your face corrupt incompetent devisive arrogant narcissistic illegal indonesian kenyan alien muslim socipathic pathological liar in chief fudge packer....
Well.. Cuba still on the back burner tho..
http://hedgeaccordingly.com/2014/12/jeb-bush-calls-for-strengthening-cub...
What about the other 54 states?
Wait...wha.... 57 states... minus 17..... would leave only 40?
I know there are 57 states cause I heered Obama say so.
You mean, the other 33 states...
Out of 34.
The other 17 are all principalities of Aztlan.
Did the states finally win Obi 1 care lawsuits that were filed or are they still in arbitration?
If those States had any balls they would have seceded by now.
They like the .gov teat as much as the F.S.A. and Wall Street.
If you like tits, no balls for you!
"If those States had any balls they would have seceded by now."
And your state has done.....what?
I do like the idea of a new Confederacy, but not the war required to make it happen.
My State has done nothing, just like all the other States - that is the point.
Where will this go? Nowhere. More political distractions versus actions.
Okay, 37 other states and territory of Alaska.
It's a farce of the highest order. As Tyler states, it doesn't matter if it is Republican or Democrat because it's just two sides of the same corrupt beast. It is to each side's advantage to keep the other side alive and well so nobody is going to seriously rock the boat.
Its worse than that, in my opinion. Republicans in Congress WANT THIS (think: Chamber of Commerce et al). They just can't be seen openly supporting it without causing their base to revolt. If they really wanted to stop any of this why did Mitch McConnell IMMEDIATELY after the elections take off the table their two biggest weapons- impeachment and government shut-down?
Maybe the states can get this done, but then you're depending on the Supreme Court which is a damned shaky bet.
You're both right.
Corporations offering health insurance to wage earners want nothing more than a .gov takeover of "healthcare" and .gov wants to tax the living shit out of wage earners to access it.
And again I say, Gruber spoke nothing but the truth, its just that everyone wasn't supposed to hear it. I have to say, it was refreshing, the truth coming from a progressive mouth for a Change.
Now that everyone knows progressives (yet again) just wanted to implement yet another "tax" (in alliance with health insurance companies, for now) and skim a little off the top for themselves, whatever are we to do with them ;-)
"....whatever are we to do with them ;-)"
Well, if the noose fits then use it.
<And I've been informed the noose is one-size-fits-all so no problemo.>
Restoring the 10th amendment should be a top priority for the nation.
95-97% of what the Fed does they don't need to do because the states could just handle it - how many wedge issues would no longer dominate the American politcal landscape if we just let the states decide?
The fact the states are finally getting fed up is a good thing.
The states got fed up with a tyrannical Federal government once before. I remember reading about the war of northern aggression which destroyed the federalist system. Perhaps we will have another civil war cause I don't see the FEDS going quietly into the night
THis will eventually make its way to the Supreme Court where Roberts will once again get all kissy-smoochy over Obama's latest self-made law and it will be affirmed.
Bobbing for Obama you say? Hmmm.....not a pretty picture. I have heard Obama's "thing" is to have old white men fellate him. Chicago bath house gossip. More believable than he likes to take it, if you really think about it.
Where do you go to hear these things? I only ask because I want to ensure that I never, ever, go there.
As long as you have teeth, you're safe.
It's okay, Obama is a lawyer and so is his wife. He can handle it!
(Notice how similar Lawyer and Liar are to one another?)Apologies to any honest lawyers out there who are offended by being lumped in with Obama.
Actually, they were both disbarred for fraud.
Shhh. Wouldn't want the MSM hearing about it--might spoil the progressive morality play of the "historic election of America's first Gay/Black/Undocumented President".
As for honest lawyers, I'll raise a glass to the Texas Attorney who filed this suit.
Cheers,
Beef
Tell me again why anoyone would want to be POTUS. The POTUS seems all powerful but is he really? He must wait for Congress to do a damn thing in most cases, and he presides over constant political whining and bullshir. I would have no paitence for these damn babies, yet they sue when someone else acts. The least productive Congress in history feels emboldened to act against the POTUS, they oppose all nominations where no one wants to work in the admin now. This has become a very bullshit situation and the American people only have themselves to blame by allowing it to continue.
Giving all your love to just one man
You'll have bad times, and he'll have good times
Doin' things that you don't understand
But if you love him, you'll forgive him
Even though he's hard to understand
And if you love him, oh be proud of him
'Cause after all he's just a man.
Stand by your man, give him two arms to cling to
And something warm to come to
When nights are cold and lonely.
Stand by your man, and show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can.
Stand by your man.
Stand by your man, and show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can.
Stand by your man.
In what I believe is a ZH first, I would like to ask for your hand in marriage (assuming you are a woman in real life).
I'm pretty sure I could get rid of my current wife pretty quick in preparation for this.
If I'm going a little fast for you, perhaps we could start with some drinks and meaningless casual sex and see where it goes from there.
Sounds to me like she already had a few drinks.
Well good for her !!! And sorry guys, she's either taken or has taken...
Or she's 350 lbs
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx_fMb1ZH_U
Thanks, Ms C, for the ride down memory lane, back to a "golden era". Women tolerated manly behavior, and it was expected of men they engage in it. Not so, anymore.
We have become an effeminate nation. Along wit their balls and backbones, men have lost their principles.
No wonder, then...
What about the poor fucking citizens who have to listen to the POTUS whining about how folks are treating him so unfairly while he issues his edicts and carries out his violent acts around the world? I guess POTUS likes having his personal SS guard surrounding him all the time. Makes him feel safe and secure and important.
The Court will simply say the States lack standing. End of theatrics, er I mean lawsuit.....
Doesn't Obama lack standing to issue executive orders, being a Kenyan citizen with a falsified birth certificate and thus inelegible to be president and well as using numerous false SS numbers?
We sued some folks.
We relocated some folks
VIVA LA ...wait..
"If those States had any balls they would have seceded by now."
And your state has done.....what?
I do like the idea of a new Confederacy, but not the war required to make it happen.
"a judicial system that is corrupt as the .gov itself".......... beautifully written.
i knew there was a reason why JUDGES wear black robes !
might as well give them hoods and head axes as well !
I've been thinking about this for a while. If you put the plight of the common man or woman in the US in light of this quote form Gandhi, where on the continuum would we be?
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win.
I'd put my money that Mr. Average Joe or Jane (the middle class, if you will) is somewhere between the ridicule and fight stage.
So, how long until the end-game? Six months, a year, two, three? I'd go for recession early in 2016 for $800 Alex.
Americans are quietly overthrowing their government by not obeying the laws. It's actually pretty easy, since there are so many laws, they cannot possibly be enforced adequately.
The various levels of government, from local to federal, are pretty much faking it at this point. They have little control over a general populace which generally ignores them.
The en-ess-aye, ISIS, ebola, cop shootings, etc. fear factor is mostly a charade, all just cover for theft by the banks and government, working in cahoots to fleece the population. People aren't taking it so easily and their numbers are growing.
Are you high? Our sheeple of an american populace is the dumbfuckest, most toyable (by the media) mass of people of any country on the planet. If push came to shove, most would bend over and take a fema rifle barrel up the butt with little resistance. Everywhere you turn, TFJ has a stranglehold on their very thought processes. I pity the present generation of kids in particular, whose minds are being shaped by disney agitprop at every turn. Do your research and see who is in charge of all forms of communication nowdays. This world is no longer objective because of them, and its fucking frightening.
there you go, sick so circuit court judges on him ( these federal courts are just as juvenile).
better yet, sick that milk toast schmarmy supreme court justice roberts on him. yavohl! that will do the trick. ya think? duh, where's my black robe !
that obama to divorce court ! spin the wheel ! cha-ching. i ching!
rummel............. i mean romney 2016 !
you gotta be kidding me. get mohamed atta here !!!
It's about time someone takes this criminal to justice. Now we need to find unbiased Federal Judges to hear the case. Good luck with that.
Maybe the Texan read Raoul Berger's erudite book exposing "Executive Privilege" as a sham.
Am I the only guy that gets that this score was settled with the Civil War??!! The Fed won. Period. End of story. Fed trumps state. That's what the war was fauht for - to determine who had supremicy. We now know.
The only way that table is turned is ANOTHER CIVIL WAR, but the fed must be defeted. Period. It aint complicated. It's just gonna be a LOT more bloody.
Perhaps you have not learned from progressives. Don't like how the argument is going, call names or change the facts.
The civil war was about ending slavery. Slavery is over. No need for another war since any states leaving won't be doing so in order to violate human rights.
Put that in front of Joe Six Pack and ask him if he wants to go die so the Feds can keep collecting more taxes.
Ya... it had NOTHING to do with slavery. Anymore than terrorism has to do with them hating us for our freedom. Holy shit...
Progeressive, liberal, conservative.... pick your team. Be divided. YOU are now conquored. Wake the fuck up.
Jesus dude - do you know WHO issued the first EXECUTIVE ORDER? Hint: he was the POTUS when the Civil War ended...
Some states were fine with slavery - some - well, it fucked with their economy (see: northern states). It was at that time up to the states to decide. The Fed made it their business to legislate and wage war against the states (under the guise of "civil rights"), but the real war was over who had supremacy. Also known as, soverignty. And we know who won.
Also, the 14th Ammendment did less to grant rights to slaves, as it stripped rights/soverignty from the Americans, and subjicated them to US Citizen status.
Fuck me.
We enslaved some folks
slavery was definitely the wedge du jour. also, not sure what you mean by fucked their economy, plenty of yankee traders made a buck off the backs of the unwanted population from africa, frequently sold out by their own people usually to the arabs, who then in turn often did deals with ship owners from a certain tribe to get them to market. the best part is, only a small fraction of kidnapped africans who survived the voyage across the atlantic ended up in the u.s., so really they were the lucky ones, they could have ended up somewhere like haiti. but to hear the left you'd think these were the most downtrodden people on the planet ever who can't even be talked about in terms of REALITY, only within the confines of a predetermind politically correct narrative. and anyone who dares to question the narrative in even the mildest terms is a racist nazi who probably hates everyone that's not white. because, slavery. neat trick.
>>>Ya... it had NOTHING to do with slavery.
You're basically right, but the "selling" of the war to the average Union citizen relied considerably on Abolitionist sentiment ("Mine eyes have seen the Glory...." yada, yada). Selling an aggressive war based on tariff policies is tough PR.
Johnny always goes away to die for Freedom. That's just how the "American" script runs; it's become a pretty sad, shop-worn little story, but it still seem to motivate the rubes.
you think 300,000 yankess came down here and died for some darkies? sorry but that's nothing but more propaganda that you haven't sorted through yet. were there some staunch abolitionists among them? sure. but they were by no means a majority. the issue didn't get hot until after the emancipation proclamation, which was a brilliant piece of political maneuver, if nothing else.
i think you're closer to the truth in that many yankee soldiers fought out of a sense of patriotism (see sullivan ballou letter) because they believed the lies about the south, or as a way to advance themselves, or just get paid, spoils of war, or maybe jsut have some food to eat, etc. lots were conscripted, sometimes right off the boat. irish were considered disposable.
the propaganda is thick around this particular bit of history. i can only imagine what people will be saying about the world wars 100 years from now.
and it can be equally argued the Johnny Reb wasn't fighting to maintain the plantation system. Most southerners didn't own slaves and in fact fought out of a deep sense of a belief inself determination and liberty. Read some of the writings of the era from the foot soldiers. They believed in the southern cause as a fight against the North trying to subjugate them. In fact many identified the cause with the revolutionary war. The war was not about slavery per se but the subjugation of the south at the mercy of the northern political and economic interests. If you look at the North and South and comapre them, the South shouldn't have lasted more than 6 months. They lasted 4 years. They fought because they believed in the states rights.
I would have to add that the outcome from a moral perspective was never in question, but that wasn't what drove the sides to war.
More two party farce comedy theatre to appease the angry masses
Watch for an emotional appeal for understanding from that queen Boner as his eye liner runs down his face from crying
Having worked in Detroit for 30 years, moving to the Southwest was a revelation. The "illegals" people are worried about work their collective asses off for minimum wage, raise families and rarely cause problems. Most I have encounterred are respectful and courteous. As with any demographic, there are some rotten apples.
Our indigenous fourth generation minorities, on the other hand, have ravaged the Welfare and Social Security system, turned every municipality they infest into a war zone, and made colledge and professional sports activities resemble the primate exhibit at the Bronx Zoo. They have been in this Country for 250 years, understand the customs and language, and are still at the bottom of the social and economic ladder. Darwin had it figured right!
Five million WORKING hispanics are a positive addition to society. If only we could offload about 40 million chiselers, one POS President and staff, things might start looking up!
Your view is well polished. Hispanics are the ethnic group that commits the 2nd highest violent crime rate in the US, and is the 2nd largest (per 100,000 population) group of welfare 'takers'. 'Few' bad apples? More like a third of the barrel, and the 'hard-working' 2/3rd have a fondness for Marxism.
Latino women brutally attack random white teenage girl in racial hate crime, media censors
The victims were all White:
Three Teens Arrested in Double Murder of Homeless Men
Mike Anderson, KOB Eyewitness News 4, July 20, 2014
Lone survivor in double homicide fought giggling teens
07/21/2014
"...They were promptly shut down by a judicial system that is as corrupt as the government itself..."
When did the judicial system cease to be part of government? Ah, well, maybe the lawyers ("officers" of the court), but I think the author was referring to the courts.
"...to get to the bottom of corruption in America...focus on Wall Street first, foremost, and only..."
Only? Okay, I won't look anywhere else.
Fraudsters and lawyers Banksters and royals Bo Peep and his sheep Among us the hung us and sang us to sleep.
Be careful about suing Obama, the taxpayer monies just fill 2016 democrat piggy bucket. Old dirty democrat trick. Impeaching him costs less. He has broken constitutional laws numerous times. Why is this jackass still running our country into the ground? Why should he head the United States of America leadership role, mocking our laws? Change is a double edged sword. Obama may be for a awakening.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/constitutional_law
Obama’s Amnesty By Decree: Has Sheldon Adelson Already Paid The GOP Leadership To Take A Dive?
The Answer To Obamnesty: Impeachment—Or Insurrection
There will be no true rebellion among states while there exists a dossier on every depraved, embezzling, pedophile in office.
This group of states will be very similar to the group that declares its independence from the Empire. Cross-reference this list with statehouses that have discussed nullification of Obamacare. The country is splitting, may it be a clean and nonviolent split.
Utah, due to the LDS Church hierarchy is a "Sanctuary State"
Since 2000, All Employment Growth Has Gone to Immigrants
Mugging Americans: ObamaCare’s Jonathan Gruber And Norbert Schlei Of The 1965 Immigration Act
Norbert Schlei Interview
In May of 2013, the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector, an expert on welfare and immigration costs, released a study showing the cost for taxpayers of amnesty would be $6.3 trillion, a number that assumed 11 million aliens: The Fiscal Costs of Unlawful Immigrants and Amnesty to the U.S. Taxpayer
http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com
Second Immigration Wave Lifts Diversity to Record High
Illegals to receive Social Security, Medicare under Obama plan
Statement issued by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith: Barry Curtiss-Lusher, ADL National Chair, and Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director:ADL Welcomes President's Executive Action on Immigration
Whites Face a Government Working Against Their Interests and Their Children’s
Peter Morici is an economist and business professor at the University of Maryland, and a national columnist. He tweets @pmorici1.
These frivolous lawsuits are hilarious. What buffoons think the Federal judicial system is even a tool of justice in the land of the lawless. The States are using a tricycle to fry an egg. Wake me when all 17 secede and every DHS traitor is a scared shitless target.
Sue?
The fact the 17 states need to sue the Kenyan is proof that the entire grifting US Congress needs to be replaced.
(PS. This is called the government-shyster complex.)
What a joke just a distraction......Constitution hasn't been followed in a long long time or haven't you noticed?
http://newworldorderg20.wordpress.com/
http://newworldorderg20.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/1945-british-national-archives-document-reveals-prime-minister-clement-attlee-desire-for-new-world-order-with-russia-u-k-and-u-s/
You do understand this is a trial-balloon for the merits of the second amendment don't you? If a president can legalize 5 million via a Suprem Court ruling in one fell swoop, then how many things can he 'illegalize' in one fell swoop!
WAKE UP America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!