This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: Calculating The Breakeven Price For The Median Bakken Shale Well

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Authored by CEO of the SOFA,

A lot of data has been thrown around recently concerning the Bakken shale wells of North Dakota in an attempt to figure out the necessary oil price required to break even on the investment.  In order to get a clearer picture of the financial situation in Bakken, it is necessary to develop a financial model of the median Bakken well (attached). 

The median Bakken well has the following attributes:

With a discount rate of 15%, the median well has a profitability index of 1.02 (after federal income tax) if $66 per barrel is used  (A profitability index of 1.0 indicates a break even situation at the discount rate that was used in the model).  This means that at $66 per barrel, half the wells are uneconomic.  If oil prices settle out at this price it can be expected that the number of wells drilled should be reduced by about half.

If the current oil price of $55 per barrel is used, the initial production rate has to be increased to 800 BPD in order to break even.  According to the J.D. Hughes data, 25% of the wells have an initial production rate of 1000 BPD or more.  Accordingly, if oil prices settle out at the current price, the number of wells drilled will be about a quarter of the present number.

Some people have stated that this shale industry exists only due to abnormally low interest rates.  If we use $100 per barrel and increase the discount rate to 20%, the median well has a profitability index of 1.6, which is profitable.  The well is still making over 200 BPD after payout.  My conclusion is that the shale development would still be profitable in a normal interest rate environment.

The production data used in this model are from only 4 counties, Dunn, McKenzie, Mountrail, and Williams.  Very few wells have been economic outside of these 4 counties.  Therefore, when these 4 counties become saturated with wells, the Bakken play is over. 

*  *  *

And we already see rig counts falling and jobless claims surging in the Shale states.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:27 | 5573660 Victory_Garden
Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:15 | 5573839 James_Cole
James_Cole's picture

My conclusion is that the shale development would still be profitable in a normal interest rate environment.

 

Your conclusion is stupid. 

 

April:

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-30/shale-drillers-feast-on-junk-debt-to-say-on-treadmill.html

 

“There’s a lot of Kool-Aid that’s being drunk now by investors,”

“People lose their discipline. They stop doing the math. They stop doing the accounting. They’re just dreaming the dream, and that’s what’s happening with the shale boom.”

Access to the high-yield bond market has enabled shale drillers to spend more money than they bring in. Junk-rated exploration and production companies spent $2.11 for every $1 earned last year, according to a Barclays analysis of 37 firms.

“It’s a perfect set-up for investors to lose a lot of money,” Gramatovich said. “The model is unsustainable.”

 

Sept:

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-08/halcon-s-wilson-drills-more-debt-than-oil-in-shale-bet.html

 

Halcon spent $3.40 for every dollar it earned from operations in the 12 months through June 30.

Like Halcon, most are spending money faster than they make it, an average of $1.17 for every dollar earned in the 12 months ended on June 30. Only seven of the U.S.-listed firms in Bloomberg Intelligence’s E&P index made more money in that time than it cost them to keep drilling.

With the U.S. bent on energy independence and investors chasing riches from the fracking boom, there’s one other number to consider. Halcon’s proved reserves from the TMS reported to the SEC: zero.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 18:17 | 5574215 Jack Burton
Jack Burton's picture

Ecellent post. Ponzi anyone. Max Keiser, loved by some, hated by many, has been harping on the Ponzi nature of Fracking for a long time. Using the argument of massive leverage used to keep drilling faster than existing wells can run down, thus the miracle of rising production. Only one problem, Ponzi financing. Junk Bonds. Loans. All feeding into Fracking faster than the decline rate of the wells. This has Ponzi written all over it. At $70 dollars a barrel, maybe whay 45-50 dollars at a farcking well-head? The whole levered miracle comes down. At $55 dollars a barrel, and well-head at under 40 dollars? Collapse.

The "happy talk" is all coming form those connected to the Ponzi! Frackers and those holding their debt vehicles, those who are the counter parties to the hedges. Lots of people are psiing themselves as this goes south.

Obama is breaking Russia, yet Russia is much better positioned, being unleveraged and with large FX and gold resrves, to withstand the oil price fall, WHILE Fracking, leveraged to the eyeballs, IS NOT!

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 20:01 | 5574423 usednabused
usednabused's picture

Fracking may not? LOL why Jack you shouldknow by now that it really doesnt matter to big business how much is lost on a deal, as those losses are socialized. Thats right, the taxpaying public will make their malinvestments pay out. Just watch and see

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 20:45 | 5574481 The9thDoctor
The9thDoctor's picture

I completely disagree with most of these articles crying doom on these "low" oil prices.

First and foremost, $60 a barrel IS NOT "low" at all!  $60 a barrel is TRIPLE what it was in the late 1990s.

At the consumer level, Joe Sixpack and Jane Soccer mom are all excited about $1.99 gas this week, yet in 2004 they freaked the hell out about gas going over $2 a gallon!  It just goes to show the short term memory of the masses.

http://money.cnn.com/2004/05/18/pf/autos/gas_prices/index.htm?cnn=yes

As for this particular article, I'm glad that fracking is closing up shop.  It is an uneconomic and extremely inefficient way to obtain energy, and the overinflated crude prices of the last decade allowed this insanity to happen.  Now that the market is getting back down to reality, this completely foolish extraction method is being shown for what it is... a total disaster.

 

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 14:19 | 5578375 hardcleareye
hardcleareye's picture

Sadly shaking my head........ 

So were do you think we should get the oil to meet global demand?  Can you name specific proven reserves that can be developed to meet this demand?  And while you are at it can you please tell me how much it costs to get that oil out of the ground, to the refinery and into your gas tank?

Fracking is one of the last life boats leaving the sinking Titanic.......  the band played on......  in the not so distant future the music will stop......

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 18:18 | 5574218 Jack Burton
Jack Burton's picture

Two days ago an Australian Shale company went bankrupt. And they are just the first across the fracking world.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:29 | 5573667 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

But the Prez just said energy was booming and we added lots of jobs!!!

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:31 | 5573675 GovernmentMule
GovernmentMule's picture

Cost of capital is not 5% now....Must recompute...must recompute...must recompute...

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 17:25 | 5574079 Stroke
Stroke's picture

Cost of capital on investment (machinery, equiptment ( if one can get financing ( one; meaning probably a recourse loan, w/ excellent credit, and reserves ( of at least 3 mos.

 

Please recompute

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:35 | 5573690 _ConanTheLibert...
_ConanTheLibertarian_'s picture

So a 20% interest rate is considered normal?? And compare with the same oil price please. Useless article.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 21:43 | 5574577 o2sd
o2sd's picture

That's the discount rate, not the interest rate. The discount rate is a derivative of the NPV of cashflows over either the life of the well, or the investment time horizon. Most of the well's cash flows appear to occur in the first year, after that, each successive year's cash flows are discounted at the current financing rate (which for oil frackers, is 5%, which in today's interest rate environment is a junk yield).

 

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:37 | 5573697 zenon
zenon's picture

How about a 10% discount rate and a 8-10% cost of capital.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 21:44 | 5574578 o2sd
o2sd's picture

That would imply that there is only one year of cash flow.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:37 | 5573700 NoWayJose
NoWayJose's picture

Have to separate out the wells - in production, near completion, leased but not drilled, not leased or drilled.

 

What will get killed is the new leases and new drilling.  Any holes in the ground now will keep pumping as the costs are low to keep producing.  You can calculate any break even point you want, but existing wells will keep pumping, but because of the existing debt most companies will NOT start new wells even if the cost of those wells is slightly above break even at today's prices.  They cannot risk oil going any lower, so will hold off.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:47 | 5573727 El Vaquero
El Vaquero's picture

And some companies are likely to still have problems servicing their debt.  Their wells will be picked up on the cheap if there is anybody left who can afford to buy anything when this all settles out. 

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:33 | 5573910 Sub MOA
Sub MOA's picture

Crowd fund the "buy on the cheap" and cap all these fuckers off with bankers and their related finacial terrorist compatriots.  Return all their assets to the general public at fair market prices/values use proceeds to further finance our "war on terrorism" against bankers and their ilk..reverse the trend bitchez

 

" There are no dreams in a conscious mind, only action or inaction"  

quote unknown cause I'm not giving ya my name ;)

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:54 | 5573744 aVileRat
aVileRat's picture

Winner winner, chicken dinner.

 

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 14:28 | 5578414 hardcleareye
hardcleareye's picture

Operating Expense does not include the principal and interest needed to pay off the amount loaned to the company to develop those wells......  while the company may continue to produce oil from these wells, the company will be going into to default and bankruptcy....  they can't make the loan payments...

Not only will the investors not be getting any return on the investments in these companies.. they will be very very lucky to be seeing a penny of the principal invested... 

This is going to be a blood bath....

 

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:40 | 5573708 KnuckleDragger-X
KnuckleDragger-X's picture

Some of those numbers can be modified and some can't. Also notice they only used four counties, I'd like an average from the entire play because I know some of the holes can be done cheaper. Production rate is the real variable, if they can't cover cost the rigs get parked.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 19:41 | 5574393 phaedrus1952
phaedrus1952's picture

Good points, in some respects, knuckle. The four counties - Mountrail, Williams, Dunn and Mackenzie are, at over 9,000 combined square miles, larger than New Jersey.

Any novice can quickly discern the state's sweet spots by looking at slide/page 13 from the North Dakota's energy's web site - dmr.nd.gov/oilgas, and downloading the August,2014 presentation 'Spotlight on the Bakken'.

The e and p boys are pulling back their plans on drilling delineation and exploratory wells (the Three Forks formation, described by the USGS as actually bigger than the shallower Bakken, has YET to be delineated!), and are permitting 6/12/16 wells from the more productive, already operating, pads.

Refrac'ing is picking up steam in all the shales. In the Bakken, Marathon is having a tenfold increase in output (11,000boe/m versus 1,100/m pre refrac).

At the end of the day, regardless of how/when this 'good sweating' pans out, there will still be hundreds of billions of  barrels of oil in place, hardware, technology, and people able and willing to extract them at a workable financial return.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 19:53 | 5574413 phaedrus1952
phaedrus1952's picture

Quick edit/note ... anyone interested in learning a great deal about the Bakken could spend the ten minutes or so going over that picture/graphic rich 30 page presentation. Very, very informative.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:41 | 5573711 Hohum
Hohum's picture

There's a table for that:

https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/stats/historicalbakkenoilstats.pdf

 

Just argue over how much a well costs.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:51 | 5573736 El Vaquero
El Vaquero's picture

130bpd per well spread over 8600 wells. 

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:56 | 5573760 Hohum
Hohum's picture

Calculate additional wells versus additionals barrels per day for some fun.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 21:59 | 5574611 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

thats pricey

130bpd per well spread over 8600 wells. 

I'd rather get a million barrels of oil from 100 wells and pay fewer workers required to pump 10,000 barrels a day from each one.

(or 200 wells each producing 5000 bpd)

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:41 | 5573715 Sub MOA
Sub MOA's picture

Another frack article let the idiocy and trolling begin Isaid it before and I'm saying it again FRACKING is a BANKSTER SCAM and an ecological fucking NIGHTMARE

 

don't feed the frcking trolls cause here the bastards come...3  2   1 

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:47 | 5573724 Jack Daniels Esq
Jack Daniels Esq's picture

Joe Sixpac saved $9 on a tank of gas, Obama says buy a house

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:46 | 5573725 Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

I have an oil field that produces 500 barrels a day.
That's barrels...not oil.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:47 | 5573728 KnuckleDragger-X
Fri, 12/19/2014 - 15:47 | 5573731 SandiaMan
SandiaMan's picture

Billy Sol Estes would love to be in business in these times

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:15 | 5573829 noben
noben's picture

Well (pun intended)... let's see who made out like bandits in this Shale (Ka)Boom...

The Drillers and Drilling Services, those providing mid-stream services (in Transport & Storage), Refiners,banks, politicians, shills & brokers, and a host of middlemen acting as Service Providers.

That's quite an Ecosystem of 'participants'.

Any bets if any of these are hanging out on ZH?

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:16 | 5573838 Catullus
Catullus's picture

So not a "malinvestment" in a $100 oil environment.

Plus you pay to lease land, so use it or lose it.

So oil has been <$70 for like 6 weeks?

Not really time to panic.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:18 | 5573854 Chad_the_short_...
Chad_the_short_seller's picture

I am really waiting to go long uco calls or just uwti but I believe today is due to triple witch and if the price of oil stays below $60, I could see more smashing next week ao I am going to just stay on the sidelines. But...... riches will be made when oil goes back up. It will not remain this low, i don't give a FUCK what anyone says or thinks. This is 100% to punish Russia.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:20 | 5573861 CHX
CHX's picture

The damage is done. Place your bets as the dominos are about to fall. This is only getting started. 

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:32 | 5573876 RaceToTheBottom
RaceToTheBottom's picture

Isn't this proof that the Saudis are not dropping oil prices to kill the US Shale industry?

Investment costs and decline rates indicate it is already "dead man walking"  or at least "dead man being financed".

There is no reason for the Saudis to kill the US Shale industry.  

 

Actually this is a stronger explanation that the US would use both the Saudis and the US Shale industry to kill the price of oil, in effect get a bit of QE4-like action and hurt the Russians, knowing that oil will come back in a year or two as the Shale industry implodes.

 

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:35 | 5573920 The_Dude
The_Dude's picture

It's a nice way for the Saudi's to send a warning to the nascent EU Shale industry that will hava a larger impact on thier exports.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:36 | 5573922 DipshitMiddleCl...
DipshitMiddleClassWhiteKid's picture

there is no demand for oil. the us consumer is TAPPED

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:56 | 5573987 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

And no amount of "what if" math is going to change that. Until such a time as debt is paid down/defaulted on, there can be only one sustainable driver of increased oil consumption. An overly active military. Which of course, will only further burden the consumer.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 17:51 | 5574155 Sub MOA
Sub MOA's picture

Sure theres a demand ...in china ..they're turning it into more useless plastic trash we don't need nor want  and there in lays the conundrum er curfuckle or ....

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:39 | 5573926 alexmark2013
alexmark2013's picture

Baker Hughes US oil rig count drops to 1875 from 1893 

http://investmentwatchblog.com/baker-hughes-us-oil-rig-count-drops-to-1875-from-1893/

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:44 | 5573940 cigarEngineer
cigarEngineer's picture

Bakken wells are about 7.2 million. You need boots on the ground to get real data. This is a weakness of armchair quarterbacking. 580 boepd is a damn good start. Some people would suck a long hard diick to have 100 boepd after the first year, although the best wells do around 1000 bpd. Long live ZH.

Fri, 12/19/2014 - 16:50 | 5573965 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

About a dollar a barrel I'd say. Those wells paid for themselves a decade ago.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!