This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Bond Yields Set To Plunge In 2015: Next Year Global Treasury Supply Will Tumble By 20% As ECB Joins The Party
Back in May 2013, when we wrote "How "Modern Money" Really Works" and noted that in the current environment, as a result of prudential regulation, derivative clearing requirements, bilateral margin requirements and general economic uncertainty including deflationary scares and other flights to quality/safety, there could be a gargantuan shortage of "high-quality collateral" amounting to as much as $11.2 trillion, we explained that demand for Treasury paper will increase with every passing month as the market realizes that traditional supply/demand dynamics in the rates market no longer exist and have been supplanted by regulatory demand-side technicals coupled with supply calculus which is predicated almost exclusively by what central banks do, or rather, how much Treasurys they monetize.
In retrospect, our observation also explains why everyone got the bond trade wrong in 2014, as everyone - most certainly Goldman Sachs and its clients - not only expected a global economic rebound (clearly that did not happen in 2014, when Chinese growth hit the brakes to record lows, and when both Japan and Europe re-entered recession absent GDP-fudging semantics), but were oblivious to the key considerations behind the high-quality collateral theme. Why, none other than Goldman in its Global Economics Weekly from June 27, 2012 and Fixed Income Monthly from July 2012 concluded that "there is not much evidence in favor of the explanation" of the high-quality collateral (HQC) thesis as a driver of Treasury demand. To see just how wrong Goldman was, compare the 10Y's Friday close with Goldman's 3.50% year-end target, and now add some 30x Total Return Swap leverage.
Which bring us to Friday afternoon, when as Goldman observes in a new note, "since then, the regulatory environment has further developed, with Dodd Frank now in place. Also, given this year’s rally in fixed income, the topic has become of interest again."
So where do we stand now that there is still trillions of explicit demand of HQC. Well, it seems that contrary to all expectations that the global recovery will stabilize inflation (or maybe deflation now plunging oil prices are actually a good thing: it seems Keynesian dogma was only kidding after all)?
Well, according to Goldman's own calculations, the demand squeeze for the High Quality Collateral that is global "Developed Market" Treasurys is about to go through the roof mostly thanks to central banks which will - even in the Fed's temporary hiatus from the monetization scene - soak up an unprecedented amount of Treasury collateral from both the primary issuance and secondary private market in their scramble to push global equity prices to unseen bubble levels and achieve the kind of Keynes-vindicating, demand-pull inflation that Russia was delighted to enjoy in the past several weeks.
How much? The answer: a lot, as in a whopping 20% collapse in supply, once the ECB joins the fray!
From Goldman:
To compute 2015 gross and net issuance, we take data on medium- and long-term bonds maturing in 2015 from Bloomberg and use our own government deficit forecasts. We assume that G4 sovereigns fund two-thirds of the 2015 deficit by issuing bonds and one-third via bills. We net out central bank purchases from the estimated gross issuance, assuming that the Bank of Japan buys JPY120trn (the middle of the range set in the new guidelines published in October 2014 by the BoJ), and that the ECB purchases about EUR130bn of German government bonds. This is in line with our expectation that the ECB will announce a EUR500bn sovereign QE program in 2015Q1 and buy bonds according to each EMU country’s ECB capital key contribution.
The data on demand from different categories of investors are from the central banks’ flow of funds statistics. For the US, we also consider flows recorded by TIC data published by the US Treasury. We cumulate over a year quarterly net purchases of government medium- and long-term securities for various categories of investors. Because central banks' flow of funds data are available only with a significant lag, actual 2014 data include flows up to Q3 for the US and to Q2 for the other countries. We assume that in the quarters for which 2014 data are not yet available, purchases by the various categories of investors continue at the same average pace observed in the quarters for which we have data.
Yearly gross (bond issuance funding bond redemptions and the government deficit) and net (bond issuance funding the government deficit only) issuance of G4 government bonds, both including and excluding central bank purchases, declined significantly from 2012 to 2013, but not from 2013 to 2014.
For 2015, we project that the gross supply of G4 government bonds will decline by 4%. But, once we net out central banks’ purchases of government bonds, the 2015 supply available to private investors will fall by more (minus 20%). Scarcity will be concentrated in Bunds and JGBs, while we expect US Treasuries supply available to the private sector to increase and Gilts supply to be flat at 2014 levels.
Please note: it doesn't matter where the scarcity is located in a fungible, instantly interconnected, globalized world. Offshore dumb money, pension funds, and everyone else frontrunning them, will end up buying US Treasurys as a pair trade once spreads blow out once again, which means that with the 10Y Bund on its way to 0%, we may well see the US Treasury trade sub-2% and the spread to Bunds will still be a record wide.
How do the numbers stack up by geography?
In the US, 2015 issuance should increase slightly on the back of our forecast for a higher government deficit. Moreover, since the Fed has ended QE3, USTs supply available to the private sector will be $250bn greater than in 2014. In the UK, Gilt issuance will be little changed relative to 2014.
By contrast, the supply of Japanese and German government bonds available to the private sector will decline significantly. In Japan, gross JGB issuance, net of the BoJ’s purchase of JPY120trn (the middle of the range set in the new guidelines published in October 2014 by the BoJ), will fall to JPY22trn from JPY90trn in 2014.
Which is to be expected: recall that as we noted previous, Japan will monetize all gross issuance in 2015!
But the big wildcard is the ECB.
According to the government’s issuance schedule, Germany expects to issue about EUR147bn medium- and long-term nominal bonds and about EUR10-14bn inflation-linked securities to repay EUR155bn of maturing bonds, while the government budget will be roughly balanced. But, in Q1, we expect the ECB to announce a EUR500bn sovereign QE program and buy EMU government bonds according to each EMU country’s ECB capital key contribution. This implies that the ECB would purchase EUR130bn of German bonds, i.e., 90% of the 2015 gross issuance of German Bunds.
In case anyone missed the punchline, here it is again: "the ECB would purchase EUR130bn of German bonds, i.e., 90% of the 2015 gross issuance of German Bunds."
In short, between Europe and Japan, thanks to the BOJ and ECB, there will be literally no bonds that will make their way from the primary to the secondary market! Which means only one thing: those looking for the marginal, and only, source of high quality collateral in 2015, will find it coming right out of 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW in Washington. And that assumes, very generously, that that other famous institution located on Constitution Avenue Northwest doesn't come out of hibernation and resume soaking up collateral on its own if and when the S&P500 finally corrects from its unprecedented, and manipulated, bubble levels.
* * *
But even if one ignores all of the above, the only thing one really needs to know about where Treasurys are headed is the following chart from Goldman, ironically enough included in the same report as GS observed all of the above:
See you all at 1.5% or much lower.
- 11915 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -




see you all at $1500 gold or much higher.
Cash, Bonds, Gold.
Ya' think?
Hows it that for years a few of us have harped for lower rates and now the rest of the world is starting to chime in?
Long treasuries are up about 23% YTD.
Ain't seen nothin', yet. For those doubters, take a look at Japanese yield levels 20 to 40 years ago... that's when they started down this very same path.
Whoops!
Yup, the long-term US 10yr goal could be sub 50bp, just as in Japan.
Problem is that the path won't be a straight line, and every time rates tick up a bit, the Treasury bears will be out in force screaming that the Treasury market is blowing up and that rates are headed to the moon.
They'll be wrong of course, but that won't stop a lot of folks from selling out (or not buying more) just as rates turn back down.
So think of this as a multi-year trend and always buy on the dips (in prices). I've been doing it for several years and it's been a very rewarding strategy.
Yup. I agree with you. The tough as nails part has become the buying discipline at these absolute levels of yields. I believes but I gots to pull the triggers more!
You might want to think about buying calls in TLT, if you're good at timing the blips and dips. Defined risk to the downside, maybe big upside if a scramble for collateral begins.
.
"Dumb money" will buy treasuries while dumb commentators will buy gold all the way to sub $600.
enlighten me how one will be able to pragmatically purchase 1 oz. of physical gold below $600 for personal pleasure and insurance purposes over the next 6 - 12 months?
because if that's the case, i'll sell about half my gold now and wait until your $600 target.
but, would my selling bottom tick the market?
The central banks will own the entire bond market by 2020. Banks will all be charging customers 2% for deposits. They think it will spur spending but everyone is broke. The wealthy will continue to put their money into art, RE, and stocks, which is what is propping up the markets now.
Neg. rates guarantees banks will be priced out of business. Good money, gold/silver in hand, will drive them out. They will be forced to accept metal deposits. Around here, the banks are still dying while holding onto the old model. I told one nice lady at the local bank that I'd just as soon stack my yard full of scrap metal and use the 'savings', created by not paying their fees, to feed a guard dog and security. She admitted it was hurting them. They're all willing to go down with the ship, and will! The tipping point is approaching.
" Robust Rekovery. "
2015?
The shit-storm shall intensify.
Ok, gotta ask. I'm not seeing why this would increase the shit storm.
As I understand it, the current shit storm will not increase however, low rates would tend to increase the borrowing, which got us into this mess. This means the shit storm will increase for future generations (of tax livestock, shareholders, employees, and customers), assuming they have to make good on that debt. Somebody will have to pay it back.
Thanks Moose. Seems hardly worth mentioning though, if we're talking about effects which won't be seen for generations.
What about the immediate widening of spreads between HY and HQ? HY going radically one direction while HQ going radically the other direction sounds like a recipe for.....something.
Neg. rates cannot last for one generation. It will drive savings into metals and kill the currency. This is why mint sales are at all time highs. At some point, banks will need to coax that metal back into the 'system' so they can use it as collateral for loans. If they don't, they will eventually tax (neg. rates) all of their deposits away. Before that point arrives, people will awaken to the scam. A relative just brought up the NIRP in Switzerland. I replied if he had been following along, it wouldn't have come as a surprise. He didn't even know about Cyprus. He's watching know!
Negative bond yields with > 50 year duration is called: the 'managed money taper' in the bottom section of your Blackrock iShare adjustments.
Please with respect for my language 'big short'
The Bilderburg Group decreed that the world's Too Big To Fail financial institutions must hold a certain percentage of "High Quality Collateral" to offset the high-risk toxic shit that they issue and is their lifeblood. Naturally, "High Quality Collateral" is defined as government debt denominated in the major currencies (Yen, Pound, Dollar, Euro). This ensures a market for the mature economies' government debt, allowing them to run perpetual deficits and print money at will. In return, the Too Big To Fail financial institutions will remain just that, with an implicit guarantee that they will be bailed out if their high-risk toxic shit debt goes pear-shaped. So now there's a shortage of "High Quality Collateral", the quality of which we are not supposed to question.
There are obvious risks to this arrangement. If one of the mature economies collapses their government debt would too; contagion could spread worldwide. Political upheaval could blow things to Hell (global war). Oil could go crazy. Gold could go crazy. Etc.
I'm betting on a derivatives blowup. They aren't regulated and fall outside of the capital requirements. The Too Big To Fails are presumably loaded to the gills with them.
yields will collapse in developed markets, but how long can this go on. Japanification was only for Japan, now that eone has become Japan, the collapse is near and nearer:)
i get the arguement about the lack of so called high quality collateral as the bullish driving force for treasurys.however interest rates have been criminally manipulated by central banks to absurdly low levels. we are now at a point that one might as well post cash for collateral.
if one were to use traditional valuation metrics most junk bonds actually have a better credit quality than treasurys.i actually think corporate management run their companies better than the government is run.their finnancials are in better shape.they would be imprisoned if they tried the the same type of financial shenanagans that we see commonaly done by governments world wide. i can not see a rational fundamental reason for buying goverment debt. there will never be a real shortage of it.
in all my years of watching squeezed or manipulated markets they eventually implode. something as common as the wholesale price of butter just dropped from around $3.10/# to $1.57 in the space of 2 monthes.unfortunately when this one goes any vestige of civilazation as we once knew it will go as well.
I have to disagree with this one. In a deflationary collapse yields will spike, not fall...
http://www.globaldeflationnews.com/10-yr-u-s-treasury-index-yieldelliott...
They'll plunge until faith is lost in the currency, by regulatory design (higher collateral requirements). It will end eventually, for sure. No deflationary collapse in the markets that support WS, just everything else, to support it. That's what's been happening in the US since 2000. QE til death!
Brilliant but ECB monetization is, IMHO, far from a given, regardless of the Squid's opinion.