This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Maybe Oil Goes to $70 on its Way to $40

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

A retrace that fills open gaps and kisses the 50-day moving average surprises everyone who was confident oil was heading straight down to $40/barrel.

When the conventional media ordains oil inevitably dropping to $40/barrel, I start looking for something else to happen--like oil going to $70/barrel. There are number of reasons this isn't as farfetched as it might seem at the moment.
 
1. The huge gap begging to be filled on the chart of the Energy Select Sector exchange-traded fund XLE and a bunch of other energy-sector stocks and etfs. Gaps like this usually get filled sooner rather than later.
 

2. A bounce back to the 50-day moving average on the WTI oil index around $73 would be unsurprising. As the old saying has it, nothing goes down in a straight line, and since oil fell in a parabolic curve down, some sort of retrace to a key technical level of resistance is to be expected.

There are many ways to calculate Fibonacci levels, but a retrace to the 38.2% level equates to the mid-$70s. By my reckoning, the natural starting place is the recent high around $116 in 2011 to the recent low around $53. The 38.2% level is $24 + $53 = $77.
 
Maybe price doesn't retrace all the way to the mid-$70s, but the possibility shouldn't be discounted.
 
3. Too many punters have bet on oil dropping straight to $40/barrel, and all those put options offer the big financial players an incentive to spark a short-covering rally that outruns stops and scoops all the money by options expiration on January 16, 2015.
 
The more puts there are at $70/barrel (and equivalent levels in energy etfs, oil services stocks, etc., the greater the incentive to push the short-covering rally higher than expected.
 
4. The parabolic drop in oil resulted more from the panicky unwinding of a crowded and overleveraged trade than supply-demand. As I explained in my series on the financialization of oil, the financial pyramiding of oil is much less visible than supply and demand, so the mainstream media focuses on what's easy, i.e. supply and demand issues.
 
Crowded trades (trades where almost everyone is on one side of the boat) unwind in precisely this sort of freefall. Once the trade has been unwound, however, the selling cascade exhausts itself and insiders who know better start buying. Buying begets buying, shorts start covering, and voila, a retrace that fills open gaps and kisses the 50-day moving average surprises everyone who was confident oil was heading straight down to $40/barrel.

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 12/21/2014 - 18:44 | 5579185 Automatic Choke
Automatic Choke's picture

what?  no chicken entrails?

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:38 | 5579335 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

Fib levels for WTI are at 72, 80 and 86, assuming a temporary bottom has been reached.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 20:49 | 5579618 0b1knob
0b1knob's picture

Anytime I read the words "Fibonacci" or "Elliot Wave" what I actually understand is the author saying "I am an idiot".

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 22:17 | 5579851 max2205
max2205's picture

Oh Charles stick to telling us about how everything is going to fall apart

You did miss the best downdraft of 2014... Oil and xle.....nice try.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:40 | 5579343 Newsboy
Newsboy's picture

"Lookin' for the dead-cat-bounce", in other words.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 20:18 | 5579479 Bunga Bunga
Bunga Bunga's picture

on it's way to $10.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 18:47 | 5579187 FieldingMellish
FieldingMellish's picture

bad juju

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 18:52 | 5579189 Squid Viscous
Squid Viscous's picture

Cramer said $52 the other morning on CNBS, bottom ticked it to the minute almost... the kike who knows everything about every industry - thanks Jim!

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 18:55 | 5579191 One And Only
One And Only's picture

 "As the old saying has it, nothing goes down in a straight line"

Make sure to remind:

Bear Stearns

Lehman Brothers

Enron

Long-Term-Capital-Management

Amaranth

Bernie Madoff

Tyco

Worldcom

Countrywide Financial 

Northern Rock

Fannie Mae

Freddie Mac

Any rally into gold for the last 2 years

etc, etc, etc

This isn't over until people feel their shit ripped from their throat.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:01 | 5579215 Carpenter1
Carpenter1's picture

Oil went down in a straight line in 2008, as did the markets.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 18:51 | 5579195 allinwood
allinwood's picture

Yes, no demand so tax that pig to 70..

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 18:53 | 5579201 no more banksters
no more banksters's picture

“How soon will the economy adapt if the prices remain at the current level or even go below 60 [USD/barrel], 40, or whatever? For us it could be any figure, the economy would simply have to get structured."

http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2014/12/putin-confirms-that-seeks-fur...

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 18:59 | 5579211 Carpenter1
Carpenter1's picture

No retrace in 2008, no reason for one this time either.

Also, notice how the Saudis drop bombshell comments right before oil's opening on Sunday, they want it even lower.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:01 | 5579218 pendragon
pendragon's picture

gaps get filled.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:22 | 5579265 Everyman
Everyman's picture

Not the 47 that are on the SPX, or the 34 on the RUT or the 28 on the DOW.

Those gaps are massive and are not filled.  Or the plethora of gaps on any of the emergence market indexes.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 20:46 | 5579600 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

we filled some folks' gaps

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:10 | 5579241 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

"Maybe Oil Goes to $70 on its Way to $40"

Just check the Zionists' playbook for the conflagration in the Ukraine, Syria, and Russia.

I don't think it does. Not until Putin says "Uncle Zion."

The banksters need to repay us.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:12 | 5579245 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

Nice December call. What was the Black Swan again? The stock market would crash?  

Not a trader but sure would like to know why a trillion dollar "real" market would implode by fifty percent in a matter of months in the first place.  What are the knock on effects here?

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:35 | 5579323 Amerikan Patriot
Amerikan Patriot's picture

$40 oil makes my Escalade positively giddy.

I was at the Esso station this morning filling up with ethyl and Vladimir Putin himself topped off the tank and cleaned my windows!

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 20:42 | 5579588 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

 

of course when Amerikan Patriot says "my Escalade" he is refering to his 1977 oxidized yellow Gremlin with black racing stripes.

and 'giddy' is Amerikan Patriot's code word for nutzy.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:36 | 5579324 Eternal Complainer
Eternal Complainer's picture

After countless talking heads on MSM telling me oil sub $50 - $40, friday, i took that exact same contrarian point of view and made a small wager.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 19:38 | 5579332 Amerikan Patriot
Amerikan Patriot's picture
What Will Putin Do Now? Comment Now

Last week, I wrote an article reviewing the events of the past year in Ukraine and laying out what we can expect in the future.  As luck would have it, on Monday, the ruble crashed, prompting Russia’s central bank to hike interest rates up to 17%.

The proximate cause seems to have been a sweetheart deal that issued 625 billion rubles in bonds to oil giant Rosneft, run by Vladimir Putin’s close confidant, Igor Sechin.  Yet as I explained back in April, Obama’s sanctions made a crash inevitable.  Russia has more than $600 billion in debt, far exceeding its reserves. Without the ability to refinance, an economic collapse has always been in the cards.

Nevertheless, the exceedingly fast drop in energy prices (Russia now sells its oil at about $60 a barrel, while its budget assumes $100 a barrell) has accelerated events.  Now, Russia’s banking system may very well be insolvent and a full-scale economic meltdown appears imminent.

So a follow-up seems in order.  Just to review, in my previous article, I laid out three key points that I believe are key to understanding the crisis:

1. Putin will not be deterred:  Despite what many hard liners believe, there’s nothing we can really do to make Putin back down.  To get an idea of his thinking, take a look at what he said at his recent press conference:

Sometimes I wonder, maybe the bear should just sit quietly, munch on berries and honey rather than chasing after piglets, maybe then, they would leave it alone? But no, they wouldn’t, because they will always try to chain it up. And as soon as they chain it up, they will pull out its teeth and claws.

By all indications, Putin seems to believe that the current crisis has nothing to do with Ukraine and Crimea, but is part of a devious western design to keep Russia down.  For him, it’s an existential struggle and giving in is not an option. Moreover, as Masha Gessen points out, there really is no power in Russia but Putin, so an overthrow by a mythical oligarchy doesn’t appear to be in the cards either.

So forget about getting Putin to back down.  We can affect his calculus, but not his intent.

2. Everyday old Soviets die and new Ukrainians are born:  While Putin and Russia may be stuck in Soviet times, Ukraine is moving on.  They see their neighbors to the west, such as Poland, prospering and that’s the direction they want to head.

At the same time, no one under 35 in Ukraine has any memory of the Soviet Union and few have any nostalgia for it.  Ironically, Putin’s incursions into Crimea and Eastern Ukraine have only exacerbated that trend.

Today’s young Ukrainians are more likely to be working for a multinational, freelancing on Elance or building a startup to market Ukraine’s ingenuity to the world than harkening back to Soviet glory.  They want to be a “normal country,” with the rule of law, strong human and property rights and a government that works for them, not against them.

These trends are only likely to strengthen over time.

3. Energy prices are likely to stay down:  Nobody saw the price of oil crashing the way it did, but it’s been clear that prices would fall for a while now. Moreover, the shale boom in the US has meant that Russia’s stranglehold over European gas supplies is in its death throes as well.

Although oil may rebound somewhat in the coming months—it really depends on what the Saudi’s decide to do—it is unlikely that we will see $100 oil for quite some time, if ever.  Back in March, Barron’s predicted $75 dollar oil and that’s probably a reasonable expectation.  A year from now, US will be exporting gas in large quantities, so that will be a drag on Russia’s economy as well.

None of the events over the past week change these underlying factors to the crisis, but the extremity of the ruble crash, its obvious parallels with the 1998 ruble crisis and the fact that it was sparked by bailout for one of Putin’s cronies, limits the Russian leader’s options.

Here’s what I think Putin does now.

1. De-escalate: While Putin will not back down, it makes sense for him to de-escalate the crisis.  This won’t be hard to do, especially since he’s the one who’s been escalating it in the first place.  Moreover, Petro Poroshenko, the Ukrainian President, has his own set of problems and would also like to the fighting to stop. Their respective teams know and understand each other well and should be able to get a deal done.

There are already signs this is happening.  Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently said in an interview that the issue of federalization—a major sticking point—is up to the Ukrainians to decide.  Further, as Bloomberg’s Mark Champion reports, Putin himself appears to be taking a more conciliatory tone:

Beyond his usual accusations that Russia’s neighbor got into trouble because it invaded itself, he called for a quick political settlement that would restore Ukraine as “a single political space.” Later in the speech, Putin — prefacing his comments with “I’ll say an important thing. Look, I’d like everyone to hear this” — said that the rebels were part of the problem. He said that at the last peace deal in Minsk, they refused to sign crucial protocols the defining cease-fire lines. He also said he believed Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko genuinely wants a deal

So Russia’s leader, not for the first time, is offering himself as peacemaker. (In his words, an intermediary.) The question for Ukraine, the U.S. and Europe is whether he means it.

Putin may not be rational, but he’s not crazy either.  Dead Russian soldiers, much like a crashing ruble and spiraling inflation, do not bode well for any leader, even a thuggish despot.  He knows that he’s in a bad spot and he needs some breathing room.  He’ll look to cool things down for awhile.

2. Shift Blame:  Scapegoating has long been a time-honored Russian ritual. Putin, throughout the crisis, has been vocal about nefarious American designs and “fifth columnists.”  We can expect him to continue in this line, blaming “external factors” for his troubles.

However, there is a problem with this tactic.  It implies that Putin is too weak to keep the wolves at bay.  He has taken great pains to humiliate US President Barack Obama, to portray him now as some kind of all-powerful mastermind has its dangers.  The Russian public may tolerate corruption and incompetence from their leaders, but not weakness.

So Putin is likely to find others to blame as well.  Former US Ambassador Michael McFaul thinks that Putin will reshuffle his government and might even sack his Prime Minister, Dmitry Medvedev.  Like scapegoating, palace intrigues have long been a time-honored Russian tradition.

3. Wait For An Opportunity:  While many in the west think that Putin is a master strategist, most people with inside knowledge of the Kremlin believe otherwise.  At best, he appears to be a talented tactician, seizing opportunities where he finds them, but operating without a concrete long term plan.

Evidence would seem to bear this out.  Like a drunk poker player, at each stage Putin has consistently doubled down on his bets while facing a decreasing expected return.  When the crisis began, his aim was to create a Eurasian Economic Union to rival the EU.  Today, he’ll be lucky to avoid a complete collapse of the Russian economy, if not his own government as well.

So Putin’s options now are very limited, but they will likely get better in time.  No one knows what will happen in six or twelve months.  It is quite possible, even likely, that an opportunity will present itself and Putin is looking to pounce.

He will also, if history is any guide, overreach once again and the story will go on.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 20:20 | 5579492 JohninMK
JohninMK's picture

Interesting analysis but the Ukrainian part seems to ignore the fact that it is probably the most corrupt country in Europe since populations got the vote. It is rapidly turning into a battleground, sometimes literally, between oligarchs with the Government trying to keep a lid on it.

Also it has virtually run out of money with no hope of extracting more from the EU, US or IMF until it sorts itself out, but it doesn't have time or seemingly the intention, to do that. The civil war will be continued for as long as possible, it is still going on by the way just at a lower intensity, as a distraction for the locals and as the basis of continuing appeals for money from everyone else.

I think Putin is playing it long, waiting to pick up the pieces after the collapse, to the gratitude of the world!

 

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 21:14 | 5579670 red1chief
red1chief's picture

Putin needs $100 per barrel for his budget only to the extent that it's balanced. How much per barrel would the U.S. need to sell its oil for to balance its budget, $1,000? That probably wouldn't even do it. And Putin is correct in that the West will not leave Russia alone, but rather than keeping Russia down, I think the West just needs to keep gobbling up countries to "feed the beast".

Regarding Poland, I was there recently and their success is mainly due to a huge influx of "free" EU money. This wall of money for their development is the reward for giving up their independence, to become part of the empire. In the future, after assimilation is complete, they will find that resistance is futile.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 22:02 | 5579816 7againstThebes
7againstThebes's picture

Americn Pastriot:  "He will also, if history is any guide, overreach once again and the story will go on."

Ah, American Pat., you are earning your paycheck tonight.  I congratulate you for the nice little, off-hand  lie to finish up your post. (  Around here, we know propaganda when we see it -- to wit: accurate analysis laced with the well placed lies).  I espeically appreciated  the words "once again."  That's worth a bonus from Tel Aviv.  

Please remind us where Putin overreached the first time.

It is characsteristic of minions of the Government Entity in Washington to accuse others of carrying out tactics that they follow.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 20:51 | 5579619 razorthin
razorthin's picture

If it goes to $40, I am stacking barrels.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 21:47 | 5579770 Automatic Choke
Automatic Choke's picture

already stacking hard from ~75 down, will continue to do so.  SA isn't selling low to lower their profits, it is all political, and won't last long.  buy the dips and keep buying.

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 21:11 | 5579664 orangegeek
orangegeek's picture

WTI Oil may in fact do this according to the weekly

 

http://bullandbearmash.com/chart/wti-oil-weekly-closes-deflation-continu...

 

If the USD pulls back, it certainly improves the odds.  What's more likely is a weaker bounce in oil for an extended period of time - ie: a bear flag

 

 

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 22:05 | 5579823 adr
adr's picture

The fucking stock market has been going up in a straight line since 2009. Any "correction" is squashed and lasts mere moments based on the long term chart. 

Where are the retracements on the way up? 

If the only reason oil goes back up is because of a fucking line on a chart it proves oil trading along with just about everything else needs to be removed from the gambler's den. What demand based argument can be made on a Fibonacci line? It moves because it is supposed to move. Feels like Who's on First.

Why is beef so expensive? Bacon? Gas?

Because some fucker who has no business dealing with any of it wants to make money off trading a piece of paper. You want a futures exchange, force delivery and remove the speculative leveraged plays based on junk debt.

If a marriage worked like the stock market every man would need to trade a Coach purse for a blow job and a diamond ring for sex. 

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 22:20 | 5579855 Gusher
Gusher's picture

Oil may retrace to $70 or $80 but the jig is up for awhile as all that would do is reduce demand even more, at a time when the oil tanks are so full they are starting to spill over the top. I say $75-$80 oil will bring $35 oil eventually!!!  Unless somebody turns those pumps off!!!

Sun, 12/21/2014 - 22:57 | 5579937 GFORCE
GFORCE's picture
Oil is going to 40. Its a magnet. Before that there will be a bounce and a rush of dip buyers! Price action always repeats. Nothing new! The market never allows the dumb money an easy win!!

http://investfts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/weekly-closings-stocks-oil-gold....

Mon, 12/22/2014 - 00:13 | 5580077 TaurusCanis
TaurusCanis's picture

Dead cat bounce.

On it's weekly chart XLE is clearly in a downtrend - below it's 8, 14 and 28 day moving averages.  Over the last 15 years when it's been below that, it's spent about 24 months below it.

Dead cat bounce. 

 

Mon, 12/22/2014 - 00:31 | 5580119 Biff Malibu
Biff Malibu's picture

I'm sorry, I have a hard time taking technical analysis advice from someone who doesn't even have a professional charting platform.

Mon, 12/22/2014 - 00:46 | 5580147 Biff Malibu
Biff Malibu's picture

Not to be a DB, but if you are so inclined to purchase an actual technical analysis charting platform with backtest capability, you will find that most common technical indicators are NOT profitable--as in trading based on readings like the above will not increase your net worth, and in most cases you will lose money.  Trying not to be a douche bag, but if you don't trust me, get 10-20 years of data and code in your indicator and test and you will see that I'm right.

 

Mon, 12/22/2014 - 05:48 | 5580389 vyeung
vyeung's picture

Hey chart daemon, where was your chart for the huge drop from $100 to $50? Nowhere, can't you people give it a rest, everything is geopolitically driven nowadays and your chart are pretty much useless in a non banding environment.

Mon, 12/22/2014 - 09:06 | 5580415 El Hosel
El Hosel's picture

Oil dropping like it did from 105 to 55 is extremely unusual, a bounce to 70 would be normal and expected.... In a real Market. Flip a coin Bitchez.

Mon, 12/22/2014 - 08:57 | 5580534 Paul451
Paul451's picture

Maybe oil goes to $35 on its way to $40. Hello? The world is in a RECESSION. $70?? My ass! There's NO demand. If the Saudi's didnt initiate the price cut, it would have happened anyway. Buh-Bye Venezuela. Buh-Bye, Vladimir. Buh-Bye, US fracking industry. (For now)

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!