This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Why Don't "Moderate" Muslims Condemn Terrorism ??!
Update:
Muslim Policeman Died Defending the Right of French Cartoonists to Mock His Religion
We’ve extensively documented that Muslims worldwide condemn ISIS. And see this.
Slideshow by Adam Johnson
Similarly, the condemnation of yesterday’s barbaric terrorist attack in Paris has been global and immediate. Here’s a sampling of condemnation which came within hours of the attack:
- The Union of Islamic Organizations of France responded on its website, writing: “The UOIF condemns in the strongest terms this criminal attack, and these horrible murders. The UOIF expresses its deepest condolences to the families and all the employees of Charlie Weekly.”
- Hassen Chalghoumi, imam of the Drancy mosque in Paris’s Seine-Saint-Denis suburb, spoke with France’s BFM TV and condemned the attackers, saying, “Their barbarism has nothing to do with Islam.” “I am extremely angry,” Chalghoumi said. “These are criminals, barbarians. They have sold their soul to hell. This is not freedom. This is not Islam and I hope the French will come out united at the end of this.”
- The Grand Mosque of Paris, one of the largest in France, issued a statement on its website shortly after the attacks, saying its community was “shocked” and “horrified” by the violence.
Rabbi Marc Schneier notes in the Washington Post this week that the moderate Muslim majority is speaking out against the extremists … but “we’re just not listening.”
Father Elias Mallon of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association remarks:
“Why aren’t Muslims speaking out against these atrocities?” The answer is: Muslims have been speaking out in the strongest terms, condemning the crimes against humanity committed by [extremists] in the name of Islam.
And see this.
»
- advertisements -
Kind of a non-sequitor, GW.
I really am glad to see Muslims speak out - I like peaceful Muslims, and I do wish them well.
Still, reality is what it is.
Reality is what we're told it is by the PTB.
Religion is used to polarize us. If anyone thinks the Muslim faith is fundamentally evil needs to remember who it is that is saying so, and if that doesn't enlighten, then come up to Brampton Ontario. Muslims, Sikhs, Hindu and some I haven't heard of, have lived in the city for 40 years in large numbers and no be headings.
See the religion angle for what it is. PROPAGANDA.
Thanks George
I had just read Kissinger's Global Order in which he discusses dar a salam and the duty of Islam to expand to ensure the entire world is ultimately Islamic and under a Caliph. Then this happened.
If Islam continues to insist on this duty in a real and physical way then the religion must be banned in all countries not already fallen.
It is good to see that there might be some compromise amongst many in the religion. All religions believe they are the 'one true'. Unless all religions cease in actions that promote these views there will be a resurgence of war on a global scale. Islam seems to be the only one now that is continuing to make this statement in a worldly way. The religion is at a critical juncture.
Muslim Policeman Died Defending the Right of French Cartoonists to Mock His Religion
Don't talk bollocks FFS! This guy was assigned to be there as part of his job and was offed because of it. The proportion of Muslims who would 'defend the right of cartoonists to mock his religion' is infinitisimal. You have no basis for making this assumption about the guy killed. For all you know he could have been a secret sympathiser of the murderers who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time from his perspective,
Dreadful journalism.
Well said MB and the lies that have been made about this event already by some extremely influential news service organizations that just happened to be in the neighborhood to cut to film when all of this unsavoriness got underway!
Those in the know are already likening it to a "Gladio" operation!
youtube removed this one and I've viewed it 3 times this morning when it beecame available!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVMV44lwx_E
"The absence of blood is curious, but if you look closely at the slow motion at 1:03 you will see that the gunshot fired at the cop on the ground (who happens to be Muslim) actually misses him and strikes the pavement several inches past him.
But the main reason I wanted to post this is that it confirms that an Israeli media deputy editor "just happened" to be there to get the scenes on video.
UPDATE: I am receiving emails that the unedited video showing that the gunshot misses the man on the ground are being pulled down from services like Vimeo because of "disgusting content", which is apparently code-speak for "embarrassing revelation that undermines the official story." So grab a copy off the web while you still can!
UPDATE 2: YouTube just yanked the version above. Here is another." - Mike Rivero WhatReallyHappened.com
Read more: whatreallyhappened.com http://whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz3OHGzwTAAExactly, the cartoons most likely offended him less than the need to look for a new job if he turned down the assignment.
I betcha a nickel that the terrorists never gave the police guy a chance to just step out of the way. If they had, and he refused, well then I would be impressed.
De Rothschild Bank owns MSM and they only play the 'moderate Muslim'
card when it suits their purpose. Every city in the Western Hemisphere
has a token 'moderate Muslim' at the ready when the MSM wants their shill, plain, and simple, GW. The 'moderate Muslim' only has one use for MSM.
1.6 Billion Muslims worldwide
15-25% are radicalized
Result is that 80-300 million Muslims want Israel and the West destroyed.
Sure 75% or more are peaceful, but they are irrelevant.
330 Million US citizens
< 1% 'serve' in armed forces.
Sure, 99% or more are peaceful, but they are irrelevant.
saudi arabIA HAS ALWAYS BEEN an ally of
the media, no?
saudi arabIA HAS ALWAYS BEEN an ally of
the media, no?
Saudi Arabia is an ass puppet and whore to the Zionist master just as the United States is that owns the media!
Fixed it!!!
i do not think your sentence construction
is worthy of your intention, fix that.
.
07 JANUARY 2015
Secrets of the Manor House: From the Edwardian To the Modern
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2015/01/secrets-of-manor-house....
Muslim leader (and ISIS supporter) Anjem Choudary once said anyone who drinks "should be given 40 lashes in public". He also tried getting these pictures removed from the internet.
http://imgur.com/gallery/WEXhI
Oh yeah mrd.
Then please explain these pictures by a Nation that preaches the moral codes of inalienable rights for all men and officially has signed international treaty(s) banning all forms of physical and mental torture against men, women and children?!!
When we do it, it's an aberration.
When they do it, it's policy.
/s <= just in case you were wondering
Awesome!! Exposing hypocricy by Muslim leaders is fair sport.
While the Saudi royal family pushes the most strict and fundamentalist form Islam, the Saudi royal family’s debauchery and corruption is legendary. The monarchs – while pushing strict Wahabism as the official state religion – don’t practice it.
Supposed Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is allegedly a pothead. 2 days after the Boston terrorist attack, he worked out in the gym and went to a college party.
Similarly, the 9/11 hijackers used cocaine and drank alcohol, slept with prostitutes and attended strip clubs … but they did not worship at any mosque. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this.
I can answer him G.W.
He works for this guy who works for THIS guy!
The First Question to Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It a False Flag?
Only for wackos.
true, only wackos commit false flags then again only wackos run the gorvernment
After any terror attack in which we cannot identify the attacker we should blame whoever takes credit for it. The Pope could have been the shooter but if Muslim groups stand up and say hurray or I did it, then it should be hung around their neck as much as anyone's.
We know they announced their religious fervor during the attack. We know these cartoonist has received threats and as many here point out, they well should have expected an attack of this nature, but yet....its obviously a fucking Joo, big nose, probably Hasidic, with those big black hats, beards and cute little dreads hanging out. Yup, they done it. Just like them sneaky bastards to murder innocent people (who deserved it) in disguise to put the blame on the peace loving Muslims...those bastards!
Now I'm really confused!
I suppose it does make us feel a bit smarter to think we can see what no one else can, whether it is actually there or not.
Muslim behavior/terrorism correlated with population size
By Dr. Peter Hammond
FrontPageMagazine. com | Monday, April 21, 2008
The following is adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:
Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States ).
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. – Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’
It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
"Dr. Peter Hammond is a missionary who has pioneered evangelistic outreaches in the war zones ..."
http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=34302
A certain tribe need to be only 1% to fuck up entirely a country: be it Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Orthodox, Shintoist or even secular...
Excellent post. The Muslims pay lip service on occasion to the radicals but if you ask any of them if someone who insults the prophet should be punished they will say without hesitation "of course". In Muslim countries you will most likely pay with your life. It is a daily occurrence. George, wise up and quit apologizing for their cult religion.
The Pen is Mightier than the Terrorist … #Charlie Hebdo
“The
Proper Response to Today’s Tragic Events Should Be for EVERY
Publication On The Planet To Print Depictions of the Prophet Muhammad”
Js
If this is true then how is that the Ashkenazi sect of the jewish peoples can be so small as a percentage of the rest of ethnic population yet wield so much absolute power over government(s) in Western Europe, the United States, England and the Middle East where they represent a miniscule part of the populations in each of those Countries?...
I know. Don't answer that one!...
Because all you need to do is look at what happened in France yesterday when they tried to include Palestine into the ICC for Israel's genocide against it's peoples in the West Bank and Gaza and Francois Hollande's push to sell a few ships to Russia to make good on a business deal for delivery made years ago.
The reason Jews rule over us is that they:
a) have much higher IQ
b) ruthlessly favor thier own through the most formidable ethnic networking system ever conceived
c) are relentless....never give up in pursuit of their goals
Whites before Jews are like negroes before Whites, always a few steps behind.
By stealing Goyim invention and discoveries.
The "groupie" in the herd has been in existence since the dawn of time. The problems come into focus when you have to question the "alphas" poor leadership when you know he's a danger not only to you but to himself.
You always have choices. But when you know and understand that the decisions by the leaders that lead happen to be all the wrong ones and are more often than not lies to control with very little truth(s) as the only anchor that ensures trust it should become rather easy the direction one should take one would think?...
As human nature time and again is weak and fails in it's greed. Not so I guess!!!
Charlie journalists were socially irresponsible. Unless they were extremely ignorant, they must have known their incendiary actions might lead to violence. They made no attempt at meaningful dialogue and they were simply ridiculing those who held opinions different than their own. No need to resort to guns, of course. But don't yell "fire" in a crowded arena, you might get trampled.
They *should* have been better prepared.
Don't want to die for lack of shooting back.
#41
Just go ahead and convert already. The have you trained to submit.
Blaming the victim(s) makes perfect sense.
Because they are persona non grata Damned if they Do!... Damned if they Don't!...
Most important of all the lie(s) of 9/11 that has framed them and anyone else for that matter regardless of religion and ethnic origin that takes a stand against the official narrative of what happened on September 11, 2001 with just the facts!
If anyone can say that ignoring those facts are a good idea by sticking with the federal government's official narrative with everything we've encountered in this Country and everywhere else the U.S. government has taken us in the "war on terror" I can't wait to see the responses lined up!
Outside the small coterie of Ziocons who organized it and Saudis who bankrolled it very few of us know what really happened with 9/11. I would take issue with you though in that it seems some Muslim patsies were involved, But they were mere bit players.
I would take issue with you though in that it seems some Muslim patsies were involved, But they were mere bit
It doesn't matter because some or most of those patsies were unknowing to the crimes they would commit. We'll never know if the 13 hijackers were actually on the planes that hit towers 1 and 2 or not, and it doesn't matter when you know that the BBC reported one month after it happened that 6 of them were alive and well living abroad after those events happened and simply woke up the day after to witness that their pictures had been used for a story?
Even if you were an agent to the parties that perpetrated that kind of evil, you will never know the truth because their is no court of law that will uphold "the law" to convict them in the times we live in, and if they sold out for money as they most often do -they made their own bed and are probably dead because they become a liability to the narrative or like Dan Rather on Building 7 -just keep lying through there own silence!
Why don't moderate Americans condemn the terrorist U.S. government?
Yes some Muslims don't like terrorists. THen again, some Jews don't like bagels with cream cheese.
The bald fact is that in late September of 2001, polling of Arabic countries found that Al Qaeda had about a 40% approval rating. Breathtaking - in any civilized coutry, the approval rating for the Sept. 11th attacks was low single digits. BUt in the Muslim world, it was more popular than falafel.
THat's all that really needs to be said about why one can't have those people around in an advanced society.
That's interesting.
I remember people cheering in Israel's Tel Aviv the day after 9/11 and many jews expressing their joy on tv because they believed the American people would now understand them better. It was quite sickening to watch. At the same time, a spontaneous candlelight vigil happened on the streets of Tehran for the victims of 9/11. Quite a contrast. Breathtaking in fact.
Wouldn't surprise me if that "Arabic" country was Saudi Arabia, one of our closest allies and the source of most of the hijackers.
Yes some Muslims don't like terrorists. THen again, some Jews don't like bagels with cream cheese.
The bald fact is that in late September of 2001, polling of Arabic countries found that Al Qaeda had about a 40% approval rating. Breathtaking - in any civilized coutry, the approval rating for the Sept. 11th attacks was low single digits. BUt in the Muslim world, it was more popular than falafel.
THat's all that really needs to be said about why one can't have those people around in an advanced society.
After the creation of Israel, decades of overthrowing democratically elected governments, propping up tyrants, and sanctions leading to the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children, why wouldn't 40% of Arabs approve of an organisation that was finally carrying the fight to the enemy - us?
That same survey showed huge pluralities in Egypt agreeing with 'freedom of religion' and also with the proposition that apostates from Islam should be killed!
There are regrettably few muslims who condemn terror in the name of their religion. If you keep an eye on these organizations, as they do over at Jihadwatch.org, you'll find that the majority of these organizations' condemnations are PR exercises against a backdrop of supporting terrorist-related groups and causes and working to undermine Western values and institutions. Robert Spencer has a critical look at the CAIR condemnation:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/hamas-linked-terror-org-cair-condemns-...
Of course there is feigned disgust and disapproval from what we have characterized as moderate Muslims. It is both socially and politically expedient to do so.
Extremists are those who take a belief system to the extreme. An extremist action, be it by Muslims or lets say the PETA animal lover sect, for an example, will all be condemned as unacceptable and outrageous by the moderates who support the basic tenets of the ideology. However, these moderates, deep down, "understand" how some in their group became rabid and went off the rails. There is an unspoken admiration and compassion for the extreme act because they, too, know the real or perceived injustices their cause has endured.
The problem isn't what so called moderates are not saying, the problem is what they're not doing to oppose radicalism within their own faith.
And tell us, please, what you're doing in Seattle to oppose American and Zionist radicalism.
We're all ears.
Shhhhhhhh. Actually showing Muslims are against the stuff doesn't jive with the western belief that the world's 1+ billion Muslims are hell bent on destroying everyone else. We can't actually show the "terrorists" are the minority because that would mean we're *gasp* Islamophobia idiots and we all know us western folk could never be that, especially those in the U.S. and especially Christians.
USA! USA!