This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Christine Lagarde Calls For World To Embrace "New Multilateralism" Order In 2015
Authored by IMF Managing-Director Christine Lagarde, originally posted at Project Syndicate,
As 2015 begins, policymakers around the world are faced with three fundamental choices: to strive for economic growth or accept stagnation; to work to improve stability or risk succumbing to fragility; and to cooperate or go it alone. The stakes could not be higher; 2015 promises to be a make-or-break year for the global community.
For starters, growth and jobs are needed to support prosperity and social cohesion in the wake of the Great Recession that began in 2008. Six years after the eruption of the financial crisis, the recovery remains weak and uneven. Global growth is projected at just 3.3% in 2014 and 3.8% in 2015. Some important economies are still fighting deflation. More than 200 million people are unemployed. The global economy risks getting stuck in a “new mediocre” – a prolonged period of slow growth and feeble job creation.
To break free from stagnation, we need renewed policy momentum. If the measures agreed by the leaders assembled at the G-20 in November are implemented, they will lift world GDP by more than 2% by 2018 – the equivalent of adding $2 trillion in global income. Furthermore, by 2025, if the laudable – yet not overly ambitious – goal of closing the gender gap by 25% is achieved, 100 million women could have jobs that they didn’t have before. Global leaders have asked the International Monetary Fund to monitor the implementation of these growth strategies. We will do so, country by country, reform by reform.
Besides structural reforms, building new momentum will require pulling all possible levers that can support global demand. Accommodative monetary policy will remain essential for as long as growth remains anemic – though we must pay careful attention to potential spillovers. Fiscal policy should be focused on promoting growth and creating jobs, while maintaining medium-term credibility. And labor-market policies should continue to emphasize training, affordable childcare, and workplace flexibility.
As we ponder the second choice, between stability and fragility, we must consider how we can make our increasingly interconnected world a safer place. Financial integration has risen tenfold since World War II. National economies are so interconnected that shifts in market sentiment tend to cascade globally. It is therefore critical that we complete the agenda on financial-sector reform.
To be sure, there has been progress, especially on banking regulation and on addressing too-big-to-fail financial institutions. But countries must now implement the reforms and improve the quality of supervision. We also need better rules for nonbanks, stricter monitoring of shadow banks, and improved safeguards and more transparency in the derivatives markets. Progress on closing data gaps in the financial sector is urgently needed as well, so that regulators can properly assess risks to financial stability.
Most important, the culture of the financial sector needs to change. The principal purpose of finance is to provide services to the other parts of the economy, which it cannot do unless it enjoys the confidence of those who depend on those services – that is, all of us. Restoring trust should therefore start with an all-out effort to promote and enforce ethical behavior throughout the industry.
The third choice, whether to cooperate or go it alone, is the most critical. No economy is an island; indeed, the global economy is more integrated than ever before. Consider this: Fifty years ago, emerging markets and developing economies accounted for about a quarter of world GDP. Today, they generate half of global income, a share that will continue to rise.
But sovereign states are no longer the only actors on the scene. A global network of new stakeholders has emerged, including NGOs and citizen activists – often empowered by social media. This new reality demands a new response. We will need to update, adapt, and deepen our methods of working together.
This can be done by building on effective institutions of cooperation that already exist. Institutions like the IMF should be made even more representative in light of the dynamic shifts taking place in the global economy. The new networks of influence should be embraced and given space in the twenty-first century architecture of global governance. This is what I have called the “new multilateralism.” I believe it is the only way to address the challenges that the global community faces.
The year 2014 was a tough one. The recovery was slow, a series of dangerous geopolitical risks emerged, and the world was confronted with a devastating Ebola outbreak. This year may be another tough one, but it could also be a good one – a truly multilateral year.
New momentum on global trade could help unlock investment worldwide, and I am hopeful about the new Sustainable Development Goals (which will succeed the Millennium Development Goals in 2015), and about the prospects for a comprehensive climate-change agreement at the end of this year.
Against this backdrop, the adoption of the IMF reforms by the United States Congress would send a long-overdue signal to rapidly growing emerging economies that the world counts on their voices, and their resources, to find global solutions to global problems.
Growth, trade, development, and climate change: 2015 will be a rendezvous of important multilateral initiatives. We cannot afford to see them fail. Let us make the right choices.
»
- 18603 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Thought she'd be in prison by now
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/27/us-imf-lagarde-idUSKBN0GR0SP20...
"The new networks of influence should be embraced and given space in the twenty-first century architecture of global governance. This is what I have called the 'new multilateralism.'"
Sounds like a fancy term for a dildo with multiple spikes on it getting shoved up all our asses.
And why didn't she drop in a bunch of references to the number 7 this time?
probably because the piece was ghost written
Fantastic. She's telling US what WE need to do to pull HER ass out of the fire. Let me get back to you on that, Chris.
<<<No economy is an island;>>>
Iceland is, for one: " We will exchange fish for your stuff we need." COD or barter.
Structural reforms =
1. Central Bank Independence
2. Legislative Dictate
Do not take her words lightly , she is high ranked in the elite. One must decode the speech
SDR will be part of the new monetary system in the NWO, once They unplug from the petrodollar (mastermind BIS)
SDR is a dinosaur relik. Bitcoin is far superior.
What is she talking about...multilateralism, that's not a 7-character word.
This is an attempt to bring the BRICS back into the fold.
The fold that is folding.
Not 7 letters, but 7 syllables. She's crafty.
Lagarde and Nuland should get a room. Two yammering nags. They would circle like two street rats kill each other.
"Lagarde and Nuland should get a room."
Lagarde and Nuland should get a guillotin. FIFY
Bitcoin is far superior.
Not for HER!
"But sovereign states are no longer the only actors on the scene. A global network of new stakeholders has emerged, including NGOs and citizen activists – often empowered by social media. This new reality demands a new response. We will need to update, adapt, and deepen our methods of working together."
What is this fucking double talk?
Sovereign states have a mandate of some kind, typically from at least some of the people.
"NGOs and citizen activists – often empowered by social media."
Fuck this shit.
I am game. OK! let's do it! I'm in.
Now what group of people should control the global money supply?
Exactly, that is the quadrillion dollar (or whatever) question. Who will be the kings and lords of the vessel. Will it be the same elitiists who took the existing system into oblivion through theft and other treasonous crimes, or will there be a new guard?
Global governance, that has such a nice centralized ring to it.
She needs to define these "New Networks of Influence".
Sounds like insider code words for "The Usual Suspects", who prefer to pull strings from the shadows.
And "21st century architecture of global governance"?
That sounds like code for the Neocon Deep State (Banking, Politics. Surveillance, Judiciary & Enforcement, Media).
"We cannot afford to see them fail. Let us make the right choices."
Too late, Christine! You and the cohort you're part of have caused the problems that cannot be fixed by you. Those plenty of wrong choices you have done proves your inability to make right choices; just can kicking or smoke and mirrors at best. The only right choice to start with is to get rid of you and your medieval style of imperial politics.
The world has changed. You are not able to keep pace with it anymore.
Oompa Loompa doom-pa-da-dee
If you are wise, you'll listen to me
La tricherie dame orange.
Pure evil:
"This can be done by building on effective institutions of cooperation that already exist. Institutions like the IMF should be made even more representative in light of the dynamic shifts taking place in the global economy. The new networks of influence should be embraced and given space in the twenty-first century architecture of global governance. This is what I have called the “new multilateralism.” I believe it is the only way to address the challenges that the global community faces."
Do you think it would be a good idea to get her together with the weepy tangerine (Boehner) or would that cause some sort of matter/anti-matter annihilation?
Hahaha ... turn it up to 11 and get Mozilo in frame as well.
Lagarde - Boehner - Mozilo ... the three (orange) stooges.
Banzai material?
Regards,
Cooter
Lagarde needs to tell it to US . We here have already embraced multipolar world .
I call for Christine to keep do some carpet munching and STFU
For $2000 I'll build you on that goes to 12.
https://xkcd.com/670/
That's almost as disturbing as WB7's Merkel in S&M/lingerie/etc. pictures. Boner / Anti-boner Annihiflation!
We oompa loompa'd some folks...
She was a secret board member in MF Global,
and thereby immune from prosecution...
Free Sunlamps for everyone!!!!
and the first million will receive a Spiderman towel.
If her and Bohner had kids would they approach red in color?
All the different types of cancer might just cancel each other out....
The Swiss spanked her ouiji board so she's irrelevant now
I call on Christine Lagarde to shut the f*ck up.
Is it just me or does she look like Vincent Price? Her economic theories remind me of some of Price's movie roles.
Xiaflex for that thing bro -
This bitch isn't even human, she's a reptillian.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yloaBw80fV4
That orange skinned whore makes me sick.
Christine will never go to jail:
Occult Message in Speech by Christine Lagarde of IMFhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYmViPTndxw
dear God when will somebody yank these 20th century socialcommiecrat tools off the world stage and let the rest humanity get on with living?!!!
@ Au Member, her kind never goes to jail. They just get moved to another office.
"Restoring trust should therefore start with an all-out effort to promote and enforce ethical behavior throughout the industry."
Ok, so restoring trust is definitely off the table this year.
This demon doesn't even pay taxes, and lives like a queen, but wants to tell us what we need to do.
Didn't know that she is so accurate formulating this kind of rubbish. I thought, that only the master of himself, Hans Dietrich Genscher, former German sec of state, was able to talk this bs.
The year 2014 was a tough one. The recovery was slow, a series of dangerous geopolitical risks emerged, and the world was confronted with a devastating Ebola outbreak. This year may be another tough one
ok,so this year will make us cry...
Hey Christine embrace this.
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BAk0XbrCYAEkeGD.jpg:large
^^^
When only ASCII art can adequately convey how we all really feel.
Well played sir.
Dear Christine
Please name one country which has prospered because of the intervention of the IMF......
Dear Zero Hedgers
Please name any countries which come to mind which have been fu@£e'd by the IMF
As of 2013:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-07-06/41-imf-bailouts-and-counting-%E...
You mean, name a country which wasn't fucked by the IMF.
You mean "never never land"?
I think Michael Jackson and Christine Lagarde would have been a great couple.
Israel?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-07-06/41-imf-bailouts-and-counting-%E...
Blatent omission of Ukraine as most recent success of IMF bailout. Actually most went to Russia for payihg old gas bill. The rest went to wage unwinnable war because IMF stipulated future bailouts depend of Ukraine becoming unified which is impossible. IMF has become a war mongerer
Shoot yourself bitch!
Unlock investments?
Huh?
It's like taking the trigger lock off your S&W. You gotta unlock it and then you can "invest" some lead into somebody.
free them (stocks) from the lock of outdated ideas of pe. Nothing wrong with pe's of 10,000 !
What's wrong with New World Order? We don't really need a new phrase do we?
Of course Lagarde will laugh as the system cracks in 2015 and then the governments of these newly impoverished nations will have to run to her apron-strings and give up their soveriegnty in order to join her new paradigm.
They created the problem, they will force a reaction and the solution will be fascism - global all encompassing fascism.
Old time doctor: Nurse, did you bleed the patient?"
Nurse: "Yes doctor, but he died."
Doctor: "That's because you didn't bleed him enough! Next time..."
Sorry duplicate
All hell is about to break loose.
That's how I read it, too.
Ooooops. "Hurry up and SAY something."
Toxic word salad. Read and eat at your own risk.
Multilateralism = Communism
multilaterism means the Oligarchy order; rule of the 1 %.
One image : Davos conclave today.
And debt slavery under compound interest for the others like in Greece.
Lagarde is spokeswoman for that order.
Now is that the definition you imply to "commie" ?
The stricter definition is democratic centralism . Communism disguised.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_centralism
Communism is 100% about having a ruling class to ORGANIZE everything via committee. You should have read Marx instead of trumpeting your socialist fantasies.
Again, you socialists and apologists pretending to know more than you do are what is allowing these assholes to get away with this shit. Stop enabling them by arguing against Marx's very own explanations.
So tell me what has US capitalism been about since it was invented post US civil war?
You pretend to read Marx and von Mises. But do you LIVE in your books or in reality?
Cos you are in total deniability in terms of understanding REALITY.
Oligarchs of USa are commies...I get it, lol!
I apoligise for no state that does not insist on transparency, accountability and true democracy.
Most of all, on saying what you'll do and then DOING what you said.
But I do believe in wealth distribution that avoids a 1% pyramid and promotes a middle class and social mobility.
If thats socialism then I'm guilty.
Communism is kingship for the elites, and serfdom (you call it socialism) for the masses.
You're guilty of thinking anyone gives a shit about how you feel. Feelings mean nothing in the real world. There is only humanity versus nature. Those of you that think there is an alternative are essentially enemies of humanity.
As to your strawman argument, capitalism is defined by Marx as a part of his system of thought. It fit's cleanly within his dialectic as the problem. When you decry capitlism, or say that it's failing, you are pronouncing by definition that you are in support of Marxism. His reaction is the violence that proposes the solution of socialism for the masses, and kingship for the elites. He wrote out a pathway for the elites to have complete control, and have you morons thinking he was giving you something by crying foul at his made up capitalism problem.
Mises was honest enough to realize that there is no perfect system. There is no utopia.
wrong dipshit!!! ALL 'isms' end with Oligarchism, you keep putting short to the hole. Look up another six feet ahead, this is where the ball rolls every fucking time. O.l.i.g.a.r.c.h.s
wakey time
"But sovereign states are no longer the only actors on the scene. A global network of new stakeholders has emerged, including NGOs and citizen activists – often empowered by social media."
Yes, let's be sure that Pierre Omidyar and Pussy Riot take their rightful place at the table.
Would you mind if I retweet that?
Please do.
Twats tweet, fags FB
OWS as well...
I can't breathe
Pierre Omidyar, and his funded mouthspeakers, absolutely - Pussy Riot - really, such a huge threat?
let's not forget Peter Thiel,
a known Bilderberger, who also contributed heavily to the Ron Paul money-bombs. I would encourage everyone here to read his wiki, and further if you truly seek to see where this shit is headed.
because this "anti-aging" thing - these monied fossils like Kissinger, the Rockefellers, all the very very tip of the pyramid, they are not going to let go of their powers gained easily. the "organ harvesting" etc. is worth your time spent investigating.
as to Christine? spokesperson, great lightning rod. the words are more important, here's hoping people can wake up to the agenda, not the messenger(s).
Ever wonder why these pukes live so long?
Check out "The pioneering work of Sir W. Artuthnot Lane" english surgeon & physician to the English Crown.
oh, I used to "wonder" - then I started to research, and watched certain "harvesting" news repeat itself, then disappear. . .
will look into your suggestion, thanks.
Thanks for the insight on LE.
Most definitly disagree with wiki position stated on selenium.
Dr. Joel Wallach...think Jerry Lewis telethon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=da4fjobOgpA
http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Regulation/FDA-won-Pyrrhic-victory-over-scientific-literature-say-plaintiffs
"pulling all possible levers" - the SNB showed how
yeah, they just flushed the toilet.
Appears the band has finally arrived, and they are warming up for the final big dance.....
You're left with a choice of only two things in 2015: something I made up and something I made up. Which will you choose? Something something interconnectediveness. Making statements that are tautological. Don't you agree with me?
So empathy statement. And remember, something empowering.
As a world citizen I feel so much better now.
Bow deep. Spread wide.
Fuck Lagarde's shrivelled old cunt with a cactus. Put one in her mouth and her ass while at it.
That's the only way she will ever understand the pain she causes the world.
HAHAHAHA
She must be scared shitless the others are gonna do what the SNB did.
There goes her power and influence!
She was so "surprised" that she wasn't informed. How dare he...
She was very fucked up, that T. Jordan of SNB did not inform her......before
Does this Guy ever shut up?
Is it just me or did DSK lose a lot of weight over the last years and get quite a tan??
I mean seriously, that must be at least 10 kilos he lost:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Strauss-Kahn#mediaviewer/File:Str...
http://actupol30english.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/lagarde_397.jpg
What did DSK do to tick off the NWO? I never believed his wild and crazy story. A set up for sure, although it was somewhat more creative than the usual stories. None of these sleazy Marxists have the slightest idea about money except how to squander it.
"Against this backdrop, the adoption of the IMF reforms by the United States Congress would send a long-overdue signal to rapidly growing emerging economies that the world counts on their voices, and their resources, to find global solutions to global problems." USA get ready to take a good taste of IMF.
"... according to the famous economist, Joseph Stiglitz, IMF had made wrong predictions in the past concerning US economy, which (thankfully) were ignored. Maybe this time, some will "consider" (unfortunately) not to ignore them."
what we need are some good, old-fashioned, public stonings.
Rebranding of the Status Quo Oligarchies!
IF we don't call it a New World Order or Global Califate or Neo-Zionist Hedgemony or such: no one will notice that we have enslaved the entire planet.
So lets call it 'A Global Network of New Stakeholders: GNNS.
No one will know what the fuck it really means and we can all give bogus opinions on what it means that shift with any given narrative.
We can go about doing what have been and fully inted to continue doing; plundering the world with war and debt.
Christine was booted from the IMF baseball game as you are only allowed one bag on a base.
Sad part is, if this freeloading bloodsucking bitch were to drop dead. There are thousands of exact dupilcates lined up to fill the slot.
These bitches and sons of bitches never fucking die.
They mutate!
Where's Dominique Strauss Kahn when we need him?
It is a noteworthy act, in today's cynical world, for someone to step up to the plate and acknowledge that the cosmos is, after all, a rational place. Where men and women of good will, by putting forth their best thinking and efforts, can make their countries, cultures and homes better and more liveable.
It is heartening to see a director of the IMF doing just that. At risk of becoming too sappy about it, reading her article has put a rosy glow back on the world for me. Thanks for posting.
BTW Ms. Ilagarde, I have inherited $100 million from my Uncle Remus who was a sheik in Ethiopia. But I need someone with an account in a western bank to temporarily hold the money for me. If you wouldn't mind doing so, could you send me your National Identification Number, with the IMF's routing number, along with your account number. I would very much appreciate it. TIA.
FCUKING GASH
She just figured out that Santa doesn't exist. Like all dumb centralists she has suddenly discovered what we all knew. Playing God with the market doesn't work any better than holding back the sea by shouting at it.
The SNB flinched because it lost faith in Canute. Others will follow.The world of faries, unicorns and magic money trees has just fallen into the vortex of unpleasantness. It's just amazing to see that she really did believe in the central bankers omnipotence-unlike the other fuckers who were just using it to line their pockets. Just like a female Icarus.
'vortex of unpleasantness'
She is welcome to go eat a bag of dicks...
Sucking up is too little too late. Russia after Ukraine and China after the pivot to Asia policies have made up their minds about how the world should be and the role they have in mind for the West is ,at best, strictly peripheral.
"Thought she'd be in prison by now"
She's a F-in scag.
Damn, where the hell is the - 5 on the scoreboard?
I know the Tylers are testing our tolerance level.
Every now and then they put something to really light up the foul language here.
I just read it a second time. WHAT ON EARTH DOES SHE WANT TO SAY??
"Gender gap... sustainable development... citizen activists empowered by social media... global growth... financial crisis... climate change, ..."
WTF!
We are facing the biggest melt-down of the global financial system EVER, so please, Mrs. Lagarde could you stop this off-topic crazy talk and get to work? Thank you.
She grabbed everything in the globalist kitchen sink for this
she's a paid, tasked spokesperson - do you expect anything different?
too bad so many here just focus on the superficials, and not the under-lying agendas.
if you're going to "wake up" this year, now, would be great timing.
Multilateralism means graduating from DP to more than three orifices at a time. If you can accept the spooge of four simultaneous paramours, you're in the 90th percentile of multilateralists.
Critical mass is around $200k US in "mad money." If you don't have this, prepare to suck, blow and receive like never before.
Haven't you heard that Obama is going to toss out a plan to redistribute wealth from the 1% to the middle class on Tuesday?
Oh God and it's got inheritance penalties built into it. It's bad enough my uncle Milton died, half his shit just went to the government. However, the benumbed and benighted Middle Class will feel like winners on Wheel of Fortune!
If only we could sort that damned "gender gap" things would be peachy.
No, merci.
May I add that 9/11 was an inside job you fucking whore?
Nope, and I'm willing to fight about it. I'd rather die than allow these fucking megalomaniacs to continue unimpeded.
States with the most people on food stamps
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2015/01/17/cheat-she...
1. District of Columbia
• Number of food stamp recipients: 144,768
• Percentage of the state's population on food stamps: 21.97%
• Total cost of just these benefits alone (That is, how much do just the money on those EBT cards cost the state?): Around $18 million
• Estimated cost of benefits alone per capita in this state: $27.19 per person
"food stamps" are "administered" by such as JPM, who get paid for every swipe, as a service to the corporate fud-industries, corporate supermarkets, and all the others in the employ of growing, picking, packing, moving and selling the fud to the recipients.
the skim should be evident to you, and the human recipients should not be so high up on your hate list. this "welfare" is more extensive than many acknowledge.
Interesting read....
"a single person can be eligible for food stamps if his or her gross monthly income is under $1,265 ($15,180 per year), and a family of four can be eligible if they gross less than $2,584 per month ($31,008 per year)."...
Fraud is indeed widespread in this program and the enforcement budget is non existent..... wonder why??? By the way... how much is JP Morgan making from this program?
I don't want to see people go hungry but I despise the pigman profiteering off programs like this....
How I wish someone would shoot that oompah loompah in the vagina...
Good luck with all that cuntface
Now I'm off to take a shower to get the stink of your "opinion" off of me.
She is a real nonvaleur(e), but someone gave her the job! Send THEM to hell, but that's another story.
I remember when the Argies lost the Falklands/Malvinas conflict.(I won't digress into the history of bitter losers).
The IMF steps up and says "right-o,who needs a bailout then".(Part of the reason the war started was because the Junta couldn't manage a hamburger stand,much less a large countries' economy).
The Argie airforce officers sing out "WE WANNA BE FIRST IN LINE FOR OUR PENSIONS!!).
Now there is national unity in time of crisis.Contrast this with the vacuum of toilet paper in Venezuela!
Oh,and part of the reason given for continuance of right-wing rule was they couldn't trust a popular Gov't to stay away from that nasty issue of the persons tortured at the Naval Mechanics school,the disappeared who were shoved out of choppers over the Rio Plata,or the stolen babies trafficked during this era.
Also,rumor has it that DOCTOR Henry Kissinger was up to his testicles in that business.
Va te faire foutre, dirigiste twat.
Red: Multilateralism? Well, now let me see. You know, I don't have any idea what that means.
Lagarde: Well, it means that you're...
Red: I know what you think it means, bitchez. To me, it's just a made up word. A politician's word, so cunt bankers like yourself can wear a suit and a tie, and have a job.
Yeah, well if you could just stop pumping the banks full of QE, that would be great.
I disagree with everything in Madame Lagarde's memo, except,
Of course, that was only put in there because NO FUCKING BANKERS ARE EVER PROSECUTED FOR THEIR VARIOUS, CONTINUOUS, RAPACIOUS CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS.
Lagarde and the rest of the globalists can suck my dick and/or kiss my ass, and when they're done, the politicians can start getting in line from the Feds all the way down to town and village "officials," who have neither the intellect nor the consent to tell anyone what to do.
I'm going to hit 62 in December of this year and am cashing in on SS. It won't be much and I hardly care if I even get it. I've managed to make my own way without help from government, thank you very much. As far as I can tell, government only exists to enslave and impoverish people, thus, I want no part of it.
Moving to S. Carolina in a few months. Found a 2-acre piece of property which the lady wants to lease on a monthly basis for farming, gardening, etc. There's a well and a septic in place, and she's got it advertised that you can park your mobile home there.
Guess what, you can't. This pretty much rural county, in 2012, instituted a law that bans any and all mobile homes not already hooked up to electric and/or water. This is monumentally stupid, in that the state of South Carolina carries the distinction of having the highest per capita mobile homes of any state in the country.
2 acres, flat, with water, septic and electric already on site, and you can't put a mobile home there. WTF? And forget about parking your RV there, even short-term. Their ordinance makes it sound like RVs and campers are made of kryptonite.
I figure I have a few choices:
1. Do whatever I want, where I want, when I want, and suffer the consequences.
2. Work within the fucking bureaucracy (not gonna happen)
3. Work to change the absurd laws limiting our freedoms.
I figure a combination of 1 and 3 will work for me. Seriously considering running for elected office to get inside the monster and begin the process of hollowing it out, and/or starting up a radical online site to promote the values of liberty, freedom and self-determination. The former makes some sense, the latter is like putting a DHS target on my back.
I want a couple of acres to farm, relax and enjoy that's not too far out in the country (need the internet for my business), but the process is, to a large degree, exclusionary. Looking and working for solutions.
It's like neo Shakesperean theater - Ms. Christine D'LaGarde is thrown to the bed by Dominque Strauss Kahn (The Phantom) is then given a ramming up her ringpiece for a full 50 points. DSK in the lead.
Well apart from Russia you can f*ck off.
Greece you are not helping.
Come to that neither are Spain and Italy.
We don't like Iran, Syria and .....
We are not keen on China.
Don't even mention North Korea.
In fact, it is every man for himself.
Hey Christine Lagarde, how's that Social Market Economy workin' out for ya?? How is the CDU doin' in Germany these days? Got a little problem with Deutche Bank, BNP, Société Générale, Barclays, Anglo Irish, ?
-
- HALF GLOBAL WEALTH HELD BY 1%...
- 'Simply staggering'...
- Davos arrives as world on verge of nervous breakdown...
- $25 Oil?
- Germany steps up repatriation of gold... Fears mount of work stoppage at ports...
Not sure who's Gold will be safe along bordering countries to Russia.
"As 2015 begins, policymakers around the world are faced with three fundamental choices: to strive for economic growth or accept stagnation"
Get global wealth creators off their luxury yachts and get them back to work.
And if you oppose it, there's a nail gun or a raped maid in your future.
Those at the top get massive rewards because they do everything.
The current situation indicates they need a good kick up the arse.
Lagarde, start by embracing the Federal Reserve gray slivering recession graph depicted on a PDF slide. The lies and desperate moves will only kill off new fake illusion. You lose credibility, we gain trust.
NWO,.........bitchez !
Ugh, this is horrid. So, Chrissy says:
1. There are 100 million women that want to work, but businesses won't let 'em, those damn chauvinist fags!
2. Non-value added things like training, child-care and workplace flexibility will magically become value added.
3. Regulators are doing a good job, but they need better data in order to catch those nasty bankers.
4. All financial failures are now pretty much guraunteed to be contagious across borders.
5. Climate change is the reason she's orange.
Also, there's 200 million people that could be working, and either that is perfectly (almost mathemagically perfectly) split 50/50 between male/female - OR there are actually 300 million total people, 200 male and 100 female.
30 years of accomodative policy is what's got us into this mess.
"More than 200 million people are unemployed. The global economy risks getting stuck in a “new mediocre” – a prolonged period of slow growth and feeble job creation."
Zero risk of that. We are already there.
If cave men voted for leaders like we have today, then all people would be living in dirty, crowded caves today, looking for berries and insects to eat - since no one could own a spear or club for hunting, and mastadons would be a protected species.
". A global network of new stakeholders has emerged, including NGOs and citizen activists"
Bullshit mother fucker! No way I am buying into that big fucking lie bitch!
NGO's are wholly owned state entities, many in the employ of intelligence agencies. Such as the CIA and MI5, others are run directly out of the US and other foreign State Departments. She is fucking lying about some form of independent NEW PLAYER on the international scene. These NGO's are each created to attack foreign governments and their secutiy through various fake organizations tasked with things like human rights, cultural education, and even health care. They pay foreign citizens a lot of money to form opposition to states the US wants to subvert. This is everywhere across the globe. CIA agents use NGO cover, and worse, they use high pay to attract locals to work for CIA objectives.
Let me tell you about this bitch! She is a wholly owned agent of CIA and MI5, otherwise she would never have gotten within a mile of her fucking job. She pushes this lie of indendent NGO's active for progress in economics and culture. She fucking LIES!
she's telling someone's "truth" - just isn't taking yours into her consideration.
beyond her pay grade and all. . .
USAid, Pierre Omidyar, Intercept'd Glenn GreenWald, Snowden's Secret, Peter Thiel, Ron & Rand Paul, etc.
connect any dots peoples?
all cia banker blab. oh my, oh no, oh yes.
etc ....
Christine Laguarde (Guard of the Realm) wants to create "Proxies" to be out front and take the Pitchforks and Guillotines.
- I guess she wants to slide out of it
Ok she lies..... like JC Junker When it becomes serious, you have to lie.... But really how many people buy into it.....
I doubt very few in the world are buying what she is trying to sell......
Shit even her own country has her under investigation for fraud..
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/27/us-imf-lagarde-idUSKBN0GR0SP20...
She is just beating the drum for as reuter puts it
"The European Central Bank (ECB) should make sure any quantitative easing (QE) program it embarks on shares as much risk it can amongst its members, the head of the International Monetary Fund said on Monday."....
Is this in any way related to the gobble d gook she spewed about the number 7?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYmViPTndxw
Hard to imagine her saying this without someone like Obama as POTUS.
I wonder what specifically she is thinking of that these "new networks of influence" currently can't do, but would be able to if they were "embraced and given space".
Maybe it boils down to her saying that democracy and sovereignty are passé. That unrepresentative organizations like the IMF are as legitimate as elected governments. Perhaps she feels her prestige suffers from the fact her authority is only a second derivative of the authority of the hoi polloi.
Ah yes, and "climate change". The holy grail of globalist cons. If they could make that one stick they are home free.