This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Meet Loretta Lynch – Obama’s Attorney General Nominee Who Might Be Even Worse than Eric Holder
Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,
On matters of policy, Ms. Lynch called capital punishment “an effective penalty” and said she disagreed with Mr. Obama’s statements that marijuana was no more harmful than alcohol. She called the National Security Agency’s collection of American phone records “certainly constitutional, and effective.”
– From the New York Times article: Criticism of Holder Dominates Hearing on Loretta Lynch, Attorney General’s Possible Successor
Eric Holder made a career out of protecting and coddling financial oligarchs (his 1999 memo essentially invented “Too Big to Jail”). This was such a lucrative decision for Mr. Holder, that it allowed him to climb all the way to the top of his profession. The dividends that supporting this man ultimately paid to Wall Street criminals were priceless. Not only were they bailed out despite wrecking the U.S. economy, they have since funneled all of the wealth gains since 2008 to themselves, while remaining above the law. This truly remarkable heist is what both Barack Obama and Eric Holder will be remembered for by history. Congratulations guys.
When Eric Holder announced his resignation, many of us breathed a sigh of relief thinking it can’t get much worse, but not so fast. The authoritarian streak and rampant cronyism of the Obama administration is a well oiled machine. You didn’t think you’d get off that easily did you? Enter Loretta Lynch.
I’ve touched upon Mrs. Lynch’s record previously, in the post, Wall Street Journal Reports Obama’s Attorney General Nominee Has Been Involved in $904 Million in Asset Forfeitures. Here’s an excerpt:
As a prosecutor Ms. Lynch has also been aggressive in pursuing civil asset forfeiture, which has become a form of policing for profit. She recently announced that her office had collected more than $904 million in criminal and civil actions in fiscal 2013, according to the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. Liberals and conservatives have begun to question forfeiture as an abuse of due process that can punish the innocent.
Naturally, that was just the tip of the iceberg. What we have learned from her ongoing confirmation hearing is that she’s a lover of NSA spying and the death penalty, while disagreeing with the statement that “marijuana is no more harmful than alcohol.”
I wonder if she has much personal experience to base this opinion on, or if it’s just more of the same we “know what’s best for you plebs, despite the fact that we have no idea what we are talking about.”
Meet the new Attorney General, same as the old. From the New York Times:
Ms. Lynch had steeled herself for tough questioning from a new Republican-controlled Judiciary Committee, particularly on her views of President Obama’s immigration policy. But the questioning was mostly cordial, and, most important, the Republicans on the committee who hold the key to Ms. Lynch’s confirmation — she needs three of their votes to proceed to a vote by the full Senate — showed little opposition.
Of course it was cordial. Other than perhaps immigration, she basically espouses complete and total neo-con principals.
On the issue of immigration, Ms. Lynch said she found it “reasonable” that the Justice Department had concluded it was lawful for Mr. Obama to unilaterally ease the threat of deportation for millions of unauthorized immigrants. Mr. Holder similarly endorsed that view.
Democrats see some Republicans, such as Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Orrin G. Hatch of Utah and Jeff Flake of Arizona, as possible confirmation votes. Mr. Flake said he had made no decision on Ms. Lynch but had come away with a favorable impression and expected that she would be confirmed.
On matters of policy, Ms. Lynch called capital punishment “an effective penalty” and said she disagreed with Mr. Obama’s statements that marijuana was no more harmful than alcohol. She called the National Security Agency’s collection of American phone records “certainly constitutional, and effective.”
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat on the panel, said she had given “a flawless performance.” Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, called her testimony “among the most accomplished and impressive that I’ve seen as a member of this committee.”
Oh, but there’s more. As if you needed proof that Ms. Lynch shares Eric Holder’s financial oligarch coddling tendencies, the International Business Times reports that:
WASHINGTON — In advance of her nomination hearing, Loretta Lynch did what every cabinet nominee is required to do: fill out a questionnaire listing all her media interviews so lawmakers can evaluate her candor. But the questionnaire U.S. attorney general nominee Lynch submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee has a notable omission. Lynch failed to include an interview in which she defended the controversial settlement she orchestrated with the bank HSBC.
The bank was accused of knowingly allowing Mexican drug cartels to launder money and of allowing violations of economic sanctions against countries including Iran, Libya, Sudan and Cuba. Lynch, then the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, allowed the bank to avoid prosecution in 2012 by paying a $1.9 billion fine and submitting to a monitor for five years to oversee compliance. Critics slammed the deal as an example of the Obama administration’s pattern of going easy on the financial industry. In the Dec. 11, 2012, interview she did with CBS News, Lynch endorsed the settlement and dismissed criticism of the deal as “shortsighted.”
Lynch’s boss at the time of the HSBC deal, Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, who was then head of the Department of Justice’s criminal prosecution division, resigned after a scathing Frontline piece that highlighted Justice’s failure to try any of the banks tied to the recession and the risky trades that led to it. It was during a discussion of HSBC before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Attorney General Holder famously said some banks — although not HSBC specifically — were too big to prosecute.
Well there you have it. This woman, like Eric Holder, will be an unmitigated disaster for freedom in America.
That’s what “liberal” looks like in today’s America.
- 48006 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


This fucking bitch is a major fucking scumbag.
We shouldn't be surprised.
Fukin' Obola knows the GOP congresscritter leadership has NO balls!
They won't dare reject her and then get labeled RACISS by the MSM.
Why would he care if they have balls or not? The GOP congresscritters want a neocon like this one. Or did you not get the memo.
Once again, proof that the two teams are the same. And yet you still speak in terms of your team not having the "balls" to resist. It's so fucking obvious if you just take off the Team glasses.
Again, as a big Lib, you mistakenly think I'm a Repub...
And that I believe in the RED vs BLUE dynamic.
You're a blithering idiot!
I'm a conservative...
There's a BIG difference! I'm not RED or Blue!
Both of them (and you) are afraid of us!
So you say, like most of your ilk. Your comments give you away, but go fuck youself anyway.
"but go fuck youself anyway."
The level of non-intelligent reply I would expect from you!
Of course shes worse, what did you expect?
I see the four week old status quo posters are out tonight to support the faux "teams are the same" guy with the Obama picture.
Hey, LTER...
Take another swig... and then... HIC! BURP!
Waiting for Loretta Lynch to start lobbying for the death penalty for breaches of the Constitution.
She's right. It is effective - but we can reasonably assume that she wants to apply the death penalty and not have her actions limited by the threat of it.
"Waiting for Loretta Lynch to start lobbying for the death penalty for breaches of the Constitution."
You're kidding right? Obola would be on death row!
And there is the devisive, yet acceptable right wingnut response. You were trained well, troll along now, nothing to see here...
So you really think Obama has been faithful to his swearing to uphold the Constitution?
Name one politician who has been faithful to the swearing in.
Ron Paul
The Senator from Utah.....not Harry.....the other one.
The original Tea Party member Boehner hates him....that should be a good enough reason.
It's just to easy to prove she's on the wrong side of nature here, but enjoy the ride while it lasts.
"That’s what “liberal” looks like in today’s America."
i am considered "liberal"....and...I AGREE FULLY WITH THE SENTIMENTS BELOW....
- "This fucking bitch is a major fucking scumbag. We shouldn't be surprised."
- "Time to water the tree The tree of Liberty"
- "Obama is a neocon"
THERE IS NOTHING "LIBERAL" ANYMORE...IT IS ALL FASCIST...GOT IT??? F-A-S-C-I-S-T....THE RIGHT HAS SHIFTED EVERYTHING SO MUCH THAT THERE IS NO "LEFT"...NOW "MIDDLE" IS "RIGHT...AND "RIGHT" IS FASCIST.
WE NOW GET THE "BEST" OF THE "LEFT" (MIDDLE) AND "RIGHT"....WAKE THE FUCK UP AND STOP WASTING BREATH ON BLUE V. RED....THIS ROMAN-FASCIST-ELITIST WORLD IS RACING TOWARD DESTRUCTION OF THE "MASSES"....RED AND BLUE....ITS ELITE V. "THE REST"...GOT IT????
IF "WE" HERE ON THE COMMENTS SECTION OF ZH (NOT THE PAID SHILLS) CANNOT SEE PAST OUR NOSES ON THIS, THEN THER IS NO REASON TO "OBJECT" TO ANYTHING ANYMORE....
Thank you!!
Anyone got a cigarette?
We got one but it's cut w/ 10% cannabis leaf to help prevent lung cancer so it's called an economy killer and made illegal here in the states.
Obumbler executed policies to the right of those of Shrub and you regard that as 'liberal' Truly words no longer have any meaning.
That's not what he said at all. I agree that the intentional dismantling of our political vocabulary has made it nearly impossible to have a coherent conversation in America. That's why they did it.
But by any and all definitions, Obama and the rest of the Washington Establishment is Fascist. If you switched the names and dates around, there would be now way to tell which "party" had enacted which policies and legislation since sometime in the early 1980s.
When we picture the left and right we tend to think linearly. We tend to see the far left and far rights as opposite ends of the political spectrum. They are not. The far left and the far right are a hair’s width apart. Think more of a circle than a straight line. Both are authoritarian. Both crave total control. Both strive for a dehumanized subservient populace. For those in either state who find themselves in noncompliance it is always the same. They wind up on their knees in front of a ditch with a gun to the back of their heads. It matters little to the guy on his knees if the drone pulling the trigger is a political officer or a party leader.
(Tyranny)<-------------------------->(Anarchy)
This ends todays lesson.
"There are more similarties than differences between opposites" Eric Hoffer "The TRue Believer"
Make sense if the far left and and right are joined in a circle, end to end. Milestones
obama is a full blown flaming progressive. Not a trace of conservative there and bird-brain stupid to try to make the connection.
Looks like we got a bunch of progressive assclowns here finally coming to grips with the murdering and thieving reality of being "progressive" and are in desperate denial mode.
Progressives build big tyrannical government, start wars and murder large quantities of people. That's the reality.
FOAD progressive scum.
Grimaldus
HSBC is SERCO's ( the largest most purely evil company no one has ever heard of) banker, which BTW was founded by none other than David Cameron's great great grandfather in order to foster the opium trade. Nice to know our new attorney General has their back. But guess what, it won't matter, the Satanic reign reign of this cabal is nearly over.
Time to water the tree
The tree of Liberty
Best get to it, the tree is almost dead.
Real one was burned down years ago. Replacement one standing is fake. It's a "faux" tree, made from synthetic materials. When animals or dogs get close to it to piss on it, they shy away - the whole 6th sense thing.
"I see dead countries". Woof.
lol
Well, I hope it is at least planted it in a free speech zone. With all the proper permits, of course.
There are some things I can't change.
We are the bark on your tree.
GIMMIE A CEE
...so I take it, it is OK for others to scarfice themselves as long as it is not you.....
Interesting, this seems to be the rub today on why noone is standing up for their freedoms.
Reminds me of Germany back in the 30's.
No. Real conservatives and patriots understand that sacrificing a few will be in vain and pointless because nothin will change. In order to make a difference, we need many to sacrifice...and therein lies the problem.
Thanks for the intervention. I would be a "nutjob" even to folks on this website if I did, by myself, some (never mind all) of the things that I think are right. We need to all stop paying taxes for it to work, for instance.
How about that guy who flew a plane into the IRS building? He was a nutjob? Or patriot? My answer? Yes.
I can make a list here and folks would argue yes or no about individuals and their deeds, but that is the point, isn't it? Keep us at each other's throats and in conformity.
Going against the grain, even when the grain is rotten to the pith, is too extremist.
Loretta Lynch may invoke one of Senator McCain's latest statements while responding to Mike Krieger's article: Get out of here, you low-life scum.
Ordinary Americans apparently do not understand that this country in legal terms is in a State of War, thus CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE SUSPENDED IF THE SOVEREIGN DEEMS NECESSARY, period.
Consequently, excoriating the current administration is not going to elevate their brutish status...get a life you bunch of useless animals.
Explain, in legal terms, how congress declaired war on any country in the last ten years, please. The press pushing the lie that 'the war on terror' is in any way legitimate is as contentuous as GWB's war. The GWOT or global war on terror is a farce. A war on terror is the same as a war on over head serves in tennis, or using a putter on the golf green. A war on a tactict, technique, or procedure is propaganda.You are a troll. Period. The only state of war the US is in engaged in is economic.
Go Away Troll!
I'm pretty sure the gubmint declared war on ME with the passage of the Patriot Act and the NDAA.
Bill of Rights or the NDAA.....hold on....I'm thinking about it.
The state of war does not merit a suspension of constitutional liberties, nor would I accept such a vicious political environment even if the constitution allowed for it. In fact, it is during the worst of times that individual freedom is most important and sacred, and should be most protected. How many genocidal maniacs throughout history made the same argument you are making? I'll put every last statist in the ground before I ever allow my life and freedom to be rationalized away into a realm of subversively legislated slavery. You are welcome to bend over and take it from the federal government if that's how you really like it, but I and many others will take a path I expect will royally fuck up the personal love affair with oligarchy that people like you seem to enjoy.
Tell that to the old Japanese-Americans who were imprisoned and stripped of possessions during World War 2, while the German-Americans were free to sabotage our ports.
Ignorant AND stupid - not a good combination.
http://www.gaic.info/
don't open that link. infected POS
And your point is what?
I don't trust anyone who says, "BwaHa Ha aaah!"
How much is enough?
I should have just called you an idiot, or a hypocrite.
Blither on... in complete ignorance!
Care to explain why you made the comment that the Red Team has "no balls" to stop a nomination of the Blue Team, if you actually believe that they are the same? Nice self-up-vote too, asswipe. Saw it in real time. Typical of your ilk.
Your desperation is hilarious!
BWAAAAHAAAAA!
I'll take that as a "no, I don't care to explain." Here's a second chance. Care to explain?
LTER... "I should have just called you an idiot, or a hypocrite."
Your apology is NOT accepted!
I've accepted my apology to myself for engaging in this inane discussion.
Apologizing to yourself... What a hoot!
You indeed take the cake, my friend!
Please go back to HuPo where ad-hominem is de rigor. You have no real purpose on an adult blog.
I believe what the man said was there is a huge difference between the GOP and a conservative.
Nmewn, you know better. He said the GOP congress has no balls to stop this nomination, which only makes sense if one believes that the GOP congress wants to oppose her. This is a sticking point to me, because I see time and again here and elsewhere people claiming that they see the false narrative of the two party system while they continue to support it. I would expect to be called out if I said that Obama did not have the balls to select a different nominee.
Ding! Ding! Ding!
We agree on something! Obola has NO balls!
Obama is a neocon, and I agree that neocons generally have no balls, like guys who say they are conservative but surreptitiously support the Red Team.
"Obama is a neocon,"
Neocon = new conservative
You gotta be shittin' me!
lets see: supports endless foreign warfare? check. engages in regime change in any country that doesn't toe the line? check. holdovers from the bush era state dept? check. Uses economic warfare to assert dominance over other countries to the detrement of both citizens of those countries and US citizens? check. Supports an oppressive police state and warrantless, unconstitutional spying? check. Supports the 'war on drugs'? check
sounds like a neocon to me
+1000
Well obviously Obama is not a conservative so maybe using the terminology of a neo-conservative would not be particularly accurate even if the have some common traits especially regarding foreign policy. Liberals and radical Muslims both like centralized government and believe that the individual should not be allowed to decide issues for themselves.
How about we agree that there is a significant group of people who want government to decide whats in our best interest and prefers descent to be silenced, and that it is NOT conservative in nature. There are too many labels used to deliberately obfuscate the real issues.
Government is overrun by people who believe that their agenda can only be advance through more power, which is why we will NEVER see another true conservative elected as president again (if we ever have had). Conservatives believe in limited government with limited power, and as such can never legitimately have the power to change government. AS we see now, the republicans will not eliminate Obamacare. They realize the power it affords anyone in power, and they like power as much as any democrat. the law will stand and become "improved"
By your definition, there are no Conservatives in American politics, at least not any visible ones.
I would agree with that statment, by the way, if that's what you mean.
There also are no Socialists.
What there are, and it's nearly unanimous, is Fascists with an patina of Social Democrat overtones. But they're all Fascists. By "Fascist" I mean the takeover of government power by corporate entities, with overt nationalism and aggressive militarism.
Democrans and Republocrats are the equivalent of dufferent brands of wash powder that happen to be made in the same factory to the same recipe. The owner of the factory likes to remain hidden from view.
Sounds like a deranged globalist to me. Labeling these monsters as red or blue, libtard or neocon, labeling them as anything other than enemies of humanity is simply playing with language.
I think everyone see's the false narrative, thats why I said there is a huge difference between conservative and the GOP.
The GOP as it has been constructed over the last twenty or so years is dem-light, in every sense of the hyphenated word. Conservatives were given Dole, McCain and Romney as opposed to Paul, Gowdy or Walker types, we know why.
Don't trust Walker. He's a very big money guy. And Rand Paul is no Ron. Don't know Gowdy.
agree about walker. hate to say it, since i had high hopes for rand, but he is a disappointment. He has spent too much time trying to distance himself from his fathers more controversial positions that he has lost me as a supporter. gowdy was a prosecutor, so unless he is different from pretty much every other prosecutor, that means he made his career railroading people. I don't know much about him personally, but the is the MO of politically ambitious prosecutors in this country. gotta appear tough on crime to satisfy those 'law and order' conservatives, although if any of yall are more familiar with his record and can provide evidence i am wrong, i will gladly stand corrected
But Obama was da bomb right Rand? You were fooled and now you're trying to save the world from your mistake. And Cruz's wife works for Goldman, yes yes, as if she's going to hold her pussy hostage so he will submit to Goldman's will.
Is there any conservative you could vote for or you going to fall back on your tiring ism's now?
I'd vote for David Stockman or Paul Craig Roberts. Of course neither will be running for office, which is why I won't be voting.
"which is why I won't be voting."
Which is exactly why we're now stuck with Obola and his ilk destroying the country!
You and your "above it all" non-voters. (Or did you vote for "The One?")
Unfortunately, sometimes one must take a stand and vote AGAINST something...
Whilst realizing there are NO, and never have been, any perfect political candidates...
And it's always the lesser of two evils. And until the revolution...
The world is not as we want it to be...
It is what it is! Live in it!
Yes, keep voting fucktard. It will get better next time. GW was concerned with how King George did not live up to his promises, too. I'm guessing he did not have a King George icon, and he did not advocate for choosing between Royalty. "You know, Prince fuckface is more to my liking." -You
You're a fool. Go away.
To expect a conservative to change government, to destroy its power, is comparable to sending antiwar protestors into a war zone in an effort to end the war. A true conservative would not accept the power that would be required to reverse our current trend.
A true Patriot would accept the power to right the ship of state.
Then he would relinquish it, having done his duty.
There's a reason Cincinnatus became a legend. Because he was about the last one of his type, except maybe George Washington. Maybe Washington.
Not really. Righteous American Chevaliers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicans_convic...
I will buy property and move there if I have to just to vote for Senator Duke. But you would not hold the political criminals of your race and your actions to the same bar. Can you say "One sided."?
Everything, the whole system, no exceptions, we go back to animals eating animals.
Its what Jerry Brown and Ted Turner wanted.
Don't let me, the skliled labor critical to your scheme, we union certified master craftsmen, to stand in your way.
Oops
To my downvoter
All I spent was blood and time. I am master of several crafts. You must not have ever mastered anything to not know me. Or you're a lawyer, not a master of anything.
Its easier now than ever. Take it. Reach for the stars.
GO
It never ceases to amaze me that the American people put a gang of niggers in the White Hut, and then are suprised when they act like niggers. Who coulda seen that coming?
I mean, what did they expect? Maybe we can elect Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to restore some integrity and honor to the office. Did they really think that an affirmative action "Constituitonal Scholar" was going to perfom the job with competance, vision and integrity?
The American people are getting exactly what they begged for - demanded - repeatedly. What's worse is that white libtards like LTER will defend the niggers that are busy shitting in their mouths.
fat finger
Have given me a
Double Stoli
Far too many
Far
Now, now, lets be fair there is a difference between blue and red.
Blue wants to take us to hell at warp speed.
Red will redline the bus to hell in 5th gear.
Proof you ask??? Check the vote on the 2012 NDAA.
93 out of 100 red and blue senators voted to repeal our basic civl rights and throw us in detention for being belligerent.
Are we still voting?
Hope, Hope and Cange, LTER you fucking idiot. Go suck some liberal technocrat pole you NutSack!!!
Keep telling me that this guy that was installed by the bankers, who chooses two friends of bankers as the nations top cop is a socialist! Sure seems to me that he is an elitist rich assholes wet fucking dream. Does all of their dirty work, makes them infinitely wealthier and then talks like he cares about poor people on TV. The fact that he is blackish is only icing on the money cake.
LetThemEatRand Why would he care if they have balls or not? The GOP congresscritters want a progresive like this one. Or did you not get the memo.
--
Fixed it for you. I have nevers seen such a misuse or incorrect use of Neocon other then on liberal places. There is nothing conservative about the new congress or anyone Obama appoints.
I think the correct term you are looking for to describe both parties is neoprogressives. Oh yea, progressives like control and war too! Didn't you get the memo?
LTER why would you even attempt to re-label a bloody tyrannical progressive piece of shit like Lynch as a "neocon"????
Loretta Lynch is a fucking PROGRESSIVE, as in true shining example of. She came out and said plain as day law does not matter.
I suspect you are trying to exercise damage control for your brand of progressive tyranny. How pathetic but more so how criminal. As in aiding and abetting progressive criminality.
You can just FOAD--- progressive scum.
Grimaldus
Obama - "Find me a black broad with totalitarian tendencies."
black and a woman?
she's bullet-proof.
She is only for capital punishment in certain circumstances, primarily in dealing with ensuring that whites receive affirmative action.
But is she nail-gun proof? She was a member of the board of the New York FRB 2003-2005, so you have to wonder.
Perhaps she's just a gold miner's daughter.
Can we confirm that she's also a rug muncher?
A smiling, well dressed and spoken thief is still a thief.
Yep, remember it was Biden himself...
Who called Obola "clean & articulate" for a black man.
Can't a white, middle class man get a job in this administration? If it were the other way around, they'd be screaming civil rights.
Black racism against whites?
Surely you jest!
Eric in drag! I get it now! Took your keen eye to show us the truth. He will do anything to keep his job. What a cesspool.
haha holy shit. some things you just can't unsee. I think i may like that one even better than the obama/romney combo
Purple Reign.*
Red + Blue = Purple. We the Purple.
Give this bitch hell WB7 like only you can do!!! ;-)
bahahahahaha good shot of the truth
will is the best
I may be slow, but I am thinking that Obama does not have the public's best interests in mind...
"They'll kill me if I don't." Ted Kennedy
"They'll kill me if I don't." Barack de Stooge #5
"I don't want to be president anymore." Hillary. Don't worry Chelsea, The Madness already has you.
Doesn't sound like there is much "liberal" about Ms Lynch to me.
Ms. Lynch said in testimony last week that undocumented workers have as much right to work in the uS ad citizens and legal immigrants. And we all have an "obligation" to work, too!
Watch the video if you don't believe me. Clown Party II.
a proposed attorney of the us and head law enforcer who openly argues to violate the law?
Coming this summer: Fast And Furious 2,3,4,5,6.....
In a world based upon the rights of entitlement, there must be those empowered with deciding WHO will work and WHO will receive. I have a pretty good idea how this plays out.
someone needs to ask Ms. Lynch why these 5 million undocumented workers are being treated better then the 300 million citizens that are living in the USA..better yet....who is gonna foot the tax bill to support these moochers coming into the country
The barbarians are in the gate and on the tower. Sad outlook for civilization.
De alliance be at de gates...to arms soldiers of de horde. Yes indeed, very sad and depressing.
More Obamanation. Definitely whored to Obama on immigration policy. Sen Sessions put the executive amnesty/right to work question to her bluntly. She dodged and/or said she bcked executive overreach.
Listen to what Mark Levin and E.T. "The Doctor of Common Sense" Willimas have to say about her respectively. Someone wrote that the Senate should just not vote in a new AG until 2016. I mean....like....we haven't had an AG since 2008 - why bother with one now?:
Mark Levin: Loretta Lynch and her position on illegal immigrationhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glaZV4vKMwQ
Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch Is Evilhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78FNUMykprQ
ET is a hoot. Imagine a black man who holds Obama in utter contempt.
Oh trust Bill and Hillary... She is everything the "Rose Law Firm" could have ever hoped for... And more!...
And as for the American people even caring?...
Sotomayor?... Kagan?... She will fit right in!
It can only get worse when you continue to take whatever they will give you without reservations!
blumenthal=Marty mcFly's dad.
Wtf is going on here. The relentless stream of psychopathic women on a mission of power? Is there no end? The end Tiberius's reign lead to an exuberant joy for Caligula. Do people not read history?
This country is so fucked up beyond hope and I just can't believe women are getting a free pass without scrutiny.
Miffed
It must be difficult for a conservative woman to watch this. My wife is pretty feminazi, but even she shakes her head at this shit. but it is the same for blacks in that those with a brain are completely embarrassed by those self appointed representatives. As a white male, I have been embarrassed for my group for some time. It just seems its always the idiots who raise their hand to run for class office while the rest of us just want to escape. I guess this is what we end up with. The kids we all despised are now our overlords.
Criminals are criminals. Most are the majority. More than half are women, but due to cognitive bias (and tactics) they get away a lot of shit and reduced charges/punishment. The most successful "minority" vilains apparently use the tactics of women and men with equal competence.
Not even the Boris In The Box computer could do this. Or beat a single chess master.
So AI is bullshit. Same bullshit as the belief that they could beat death, that your "leaders" sold you out for. Attenuated decrepency is all they got for their honor, and your asses. P.T. Barnum.
Maintaining the republic requires effort. Get over your differences or suffer together.
Degrading to all women isn't it?
Mrs.N says the same thing all the time, "What are her qualifications again?"
Without exception every man has at some time lamented that women are his ruin. Its the primary theme of the Bible. Women lie, women cheat, women fuck up most of the time... etc.
But men also lie. Men also cheat. Men also fuck up most of the time. Who gets blamed and how much shit you have to eat really does depend on where you're standing when your positions close.
Another in a long lineup of Pure Evil Criminal Psychopathics put in positions of power to Control the masses through campaigns of Fear. propaganda, PsOp's & False Narrative Scripts.
"Lynch''n times a coing for all these Scum Fucks.
To bad for her she's not Lynchproof..............
Unfuckingbelievable
Fucking amazing.
everyone will be worse than the one before forever. deal with it.
Well, you gotta admit she's right.......the death penalty is an effective punishment. Master of the insipidly obvious.
Not the way she's going to use it, Heinrich.
Terrifying, but it was the only way they could be sure to keep their promise to close Guantanamo Bay without losing certain "special capabilities."
I searched for "APAQ" on Google Earth. It went directly to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Today it goes to Quebec.
When reading translate the phrase "the government" for "the crown". Its... insightful.
She looks like Al Sharpton in drag.
You're just trying to get in her pants with flattery like that, aren't you?
Of course
I hope he likes what he finds in there.
Unless there is any revolution where the elite are all killed, nothing changes and shit just keeps getting worse.
Fuck knows what the 22nd century will be like if this is how the 21st is turning out.
Very quiet.
My God it's full of sheep!
she had me at Hello.
-
"Mary Cheney wants to know why it isn't "socially acceptable" for a white person to "put on blackface and act out offensive stereotypes of African-Americans" if drags queens are allowed to imitate female stereotypes?"
- actually I don't like Cheney the VP, and don't think much about Liz or Mary, but why the hell can't we do Shakespeare, vaudeville, and black face? What is wrong with Redskins for a football team?
Hater!!!
"WHITE MALE PRIVILEGE."...*mutters*...fuck, umm..shit...I dunno...umm...
"WHITE MALE PRIVILEGE."
"That oughta hold em for a while."
Thats another thing shovelhead, you can tell a society is in a general state of decline, with entirely too much time on some peoples hands when certain disparate groups within it can come up terms of offense like...microaggression.
I mean fucking really?!?!
Its NOT that I'm displaying my family jewels in the hopes that some woman will jump on for a ride, its that its uncomfortable for me to sit with my legs crossed and yes, I really don't care how much room I take up and I will scratch whatever itches (discretely) whenever I want, so don't pay so much attention to me if you don't want to be "offended".
Its NOT that I'm saying all blacks are like Michael Brown, its just the simple fact that because Michael Brown is black he doesn't get a pass from me for being a fucking thug no more than Vito the Leg-Breaker down on the docks does.
Microaggression...lol.
You don't seem to get it, friend. Death is inevitable. Permanent.
Do your best. While you can.
In prison they seperate by race. Easier to control.
Your skin means more than your skids.