This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Why Apple, With $178 Billion In Cash, Is Raising Debt

Tyler Durden's picture




 

As noted earlier, one of the reasons Treasurys are selling off today is because bond investors, who are preparing to consumer yet another batch of $5 billion in Apple bonds to fund repurchases of AAPL stock, have been shorting matched Treasurys for rate lock/interest-rate hedge purposes. That this may have led correlation algos to buy up stocks (because TSYs sell offs have become one of the most bullish stock signals yet, alongside sudden, unexpected surges in crude) is hardly surprising: after all AAPL now accounts for all the earnings growth in Q4.

But another, more relevant, question is why does Apple, which at least check had $178 billion in total cash and investments, need to issue debt to buy back its shares?

The answer is simple: virtually all of AAPL's cash growth in the December 31 quarter took place offshore, where its cash hoard rose from $137 billion to $158 billion (mostly thanks to the previously mentioned surge in Chinese iPhone purchases). How much of Apple's cash is domestic? As the following chart shows, a paltry $20 billion of AAPL's cash, or barely above 10%, is held domestically - one of the lowest levels in the past 4 years - and can be used for such corporate activities as stock buybacks and dividends.

In other words, companies like Apple are praying to their offshore gods that Obama's initiative to impose a one-time tax on offshore profits and cash holdings, is dead on arrival. Which, luckily for AAPL, GOOG, and every other cashflow positive tech company, it is.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:14 | 5735217 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Boom.  This is what is commanly referred to as "calling a bluff".  The U.S. is now just as corrupt and fascist as the rest of the world.

"winning"

Interesting times indeed.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:20 | 5735223 ml8ml8
ml8ml8's picture

In Apple We Trust.

 

No, seriously, think about it.  Traders are shorting US Treasuries to go long Apple bonds?  I know that's basically a pair trade, but I also think it indicates they perceive Apple as at least as credit worthy as the US government.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:20 | 5735246 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Anyone that shorts U.S. treasuries deserves what they get.  Look at the E.Z.  A place where many countries actually have balanced budgets and yet many of their yields are negative.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:32 | 5735299 SickDollar
SickDollar's picture

what is the ratio to debt ????

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:38 | 5735318 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Return the world to "mark to market" accounting and then I might be able to answer that question.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:13 | 5735684 Ying-Yang
Ying-Yang's picture

If Apple was a great American corporation....

Could it manufacture products back in the USA to spur job growth here in the states?

Could they pay American rank and file employees higher wages?

Could they lower product prices to increase market share?

Could they pay management more bonuses?

Could they reward stockholders with higher stock valuations and dividends?

It is a moral choice as well as a financial choice how they use 178 billion. Apple is a great international company that really does not give a shit about Americans. I give you 178 billion reasons why Apple is part of the NWO problem and not to be envied.

 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 19:25 | 5736870 Stained Class
Stained Class's picture

"The money is overseas", bullshit. Its held in segregated accounts of JPM, Citi, Barclays etc. but its only a keystroke away. 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:44 | 5735345 taketheredpill
taketheredpill's picture

Usually Rate Lock is done by Issuer or Agent to lock in current financing level.  Short vol adjusted block of Treasuries so if rates rise by the time of the debt issue what you lose in higher financing cost you gain on short of treasuries?

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:18 | 5735228 Headbanger
Headbanger's picture

Yeah, AAPL can't "repatriate" their foreign cash else it gets taxed NOW.

Can anybody confirm that buying back a corps own stock on foreign exchanges is considered "repatriating" foreign profits?

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:38 | 5735320 weburke
weburke's picture

"The cash is overseas, if you bring it back, it gets taxed.

Sell bonds in US, that's how you can effectively repatriate cash, at a cost of say 3%, instead of paying tax on it at say 30%."

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:44 | 5735558 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

Still don't get the connection between Apple and the entire treasury complex.

 

My understanding on debt is that Treasury announced 75 billion plus in issuance of short term debt from today through the rest of the year.

 

That's a lot of debt in my view...and a very aggressive way to finance fedreral spending.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:37 | 5735541 ZH Snob
ZH Snob's picture

they probably need as much money as they can get to triple the wages of the chinese workers who make their iphones then choose to jump out the window.  they really hate to lose conscientous help like this.

 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:13 | 5735218 j0nx
j0nx's picture

So if I hold my cash offshore from profits that were likely generated here in the states, regardless of what I say in my reports, then I can declare them tax free too? Woohoo! Oh, wait, that only works for corporations and politicians. 2 laws bitches.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:16 | 5735232 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

No, corporations are now equal to people.  Get your cash to a friendly island banker, ASAP!

I know many who are.  There is no longer any legal ground for the IRS to stand on.  Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.  TPTB are intentionally trying to destroy the .gov so that the next "crisis" can start.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:55 | 5735387 BandGap
BandGap's picture

It fascinating to watch. Viewed through the lens that every major turn or event where the govenrment is involved leads to some measure of chaos is pretty wild.  Even the wookie endorsing American Sniper over the weekend takes a confusuion aspect when you consider how the left sees that movie. Up is down.

No way to get out of the way at this point. Bring the kids in close and stay vigilent.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 18:18 | 5736607 mcsean2163
mcsean2163's picture

American sniper. Movie about US sniper fighting a war because of non existent weapons of mass destruction. 130,000 civilllians killed since the start of the war.  

 

911 x 43.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 19:51 | 5736953 lordylord
lordylord's picture

130,000?  More like 1,000,000+

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:56 | 5735906 SmedleyButlersGhost
SmedleyButlersGhost's picture

"a friendly island banker"

Please identify that trustworthy  institution and let me know how that works out.

I won't hold my breath

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:00 | 5735411 noben
noben's picture

Corporations might have the same rights as people, but people do not have the same rights as corporations.

Moral: "Thou shall incorporate" if at all cost, and have HQ offshore if possible. (Single-Member LLCs are SOL, of course).

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:57 | 5735599 Refuse-Resist
Refuse-Resist's picture

Yep.  I've been trying to figure out how to get taxed on my 'net' income rather than my gross.

Seems that corps get to deduct all expenses from gross, like electric, rent, phones, internet, cars, etc.

If I did that, my net income would be 0, thus my tax liability would be negative or at least 0.

Hmm.

 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 18:10 | 5736569 Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai's picture

You are a wage serf. "Fuck you, pay me."

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:09 | 5735656 juicemoney
juicemoney's picture

This is key. It is another barrier to entry. Have to pay an accountant, lawyer and banker to manage your business' cash flow. Don't make enough to do that? Then you have to pay the technocrats their full cut. Either way it cuts out the fresh kid on the block.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:21 | 5735692 noben
noben's picture

As part of the double-standard that is highly preferential to sizable corporations, although individual might go to jail for tax fraud and other financial malfeasance, large corporations do not go to jail, nor do their executives.

Rather, they pay a fine, that they then pass on to their shareholders. And customers, in the case of banks.

I'm not a tax specialist or a CPA, but I'm guessing that when the net income of your business (LLC or S-corp) reaches the high 6-figure levels, it becomes more profitable to move your HQ offshore -- depending on the Breakeven point of the Cost/Benefit for your situation.

Perhaps this is something that Tyler or one of the regular ZH writers can write about?

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 18:15 | 5736594 Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai's picture

Even if your corporation is headquartered and incorporated overseas, it will still have to pay US taxes on income earned in the US.

Apple pays income tax on its US income; however, it earns a shit-ton of money from operations overseas, and it doesn't have to pay US taxes on that foreign income as long as it stays overseas.

Of course, the monumental injustice is that human persons who are US citizens are taxed on their income WHEREVER IT IS EARNED. If there was any justice, US citizens would be held to the same standard as US corporations. But as we know, corporations are given massive preferential treatment over actual human beings. Which is immoral and perverse.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:13 | 5735220 FieldingMellish
FieldingMellish's picture

Maybe AAPL and GOOG need to reconsider corporate headquarters as insurance just in case the "one-time tax" ("one-time"... just like income tax, right?) has legs.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:15 | 5735222 Headbanger
Headbanger's picture

Never mind

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:15 | 5735225 That_shits_broken
That_shits_broken's picture

Get to work Mr. Bullard! You fucktard.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:14 | 5735226 That_shits_broken
That_shits_broken's picture

Get to work Mr. Bullard! You fucktard.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:15 | 5735227 onewayticket2
onewayticket2's picture

obama is coming for that cash.....

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:24 | 5735257 Frank N. Beans
Frank N. Beans's picture

"... and can be used for such corporate activities as stock buybacks and dividends" and raises and bonuses to the company's core people.  

pun intended 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:25 | 5735266 Soul Glow
Soul Glow's picture

Assets + Resreves = Liabilities 

Expand cash, expand debt.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:25 | 5735271 heisenberg991
heisenberg991's picture

14% of 178 billion is nothing. Obama needs to raise that number.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 18:19 | 5736614 Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai's picture

Shit. Using that logic, why not take 100%? The Federal Budget is a black hole, it will absorb anything you throw into it, and still not go away.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:33 | 5735294 Herodotus
Herodotus's picture

How much gold does Apple have in its vaults?

Tue, 02/03/2015 - 04:54 | 5738111 MansaMusa
MansaMusa's picture

Gold iPhones, that's about it

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:33 | 5735305 djrichard
djrichard's picture

Need to think of Apple as akin to a Sovereign Wealth Fund.

Instead of oil they pump out i-consumables.  And instead of banking petrodollars, they bank appledollars.

But there's one big difference; where petrodollars are recycled into bonds or stock, appledollars sit there unrecycled.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:00 | 5735389 itstippy
itstippy's picture

Money never sleeps.  

No matter where on the planet Apple has their $178B cash parked, someone is leveraging it 10X and dabbling in Greek government bonds, oil futures, Shake Shack options, who knows what.  Ask Mr. Corzine how it works.

The reason The Honorable Mr. Corzine wasn't prosecuted for gross misuse of clients' money is that he would have proven in court that his actions were no different than anyone else in the Big Finance world.  His position in Greek bonds went sour is all.  The loss was big enough that MF Global couldn't cover it, and several billion dollars in clients' "segregated" funds got "vaporized".

The Applebucks are in play X10; you can take that to the bank (if you dare). 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:02 | 5735422 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Yes, "money" never sleeps, however, in the absence of real justice and rule of laws and contracts, fiat most certainly dies.

Full faith and credit...

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:17 | 5735472 Apocalicious
Apocalicious's picture

"And you don't realize there is no world anymore! It's only corporations!" - Number Two

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:24 | 5735489 Fix-ItSilly
Fix-ItSilly's picture

Or...  like an 1800s Southern Plantation owner leveraging off of slave labor (African then, Chinese now) as it sells through the merchant bankers of boston, New York City and Philadelphia (back then) Netherlands, Luxembourg and Ireland (now).

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:40 | 5735337 Atomizer
Atomizer's picture

iWatch gimmick is using too much Net neutrality ISP carbon footprint throttling to check the time on your watch or pick out the phone in your skinny jeans. We must find out how we can increase 2.0, 5.0 to 7.0 GB unlimited access under LTE free Wi-Fi. We can start tracking customers and send cell broadcasting information to the idiots who don’t know about security settings on their smartphone.

 

/SARC

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:50 | 5735371 BandGap
BandGap's picture

I have no cash except what I need to operate my family finances.

Very little in stocks and no bonds.

Getting ugly out there.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:54 | 5735383 Spectre
Spectre's picture

Sheeeesh, $178 Billion is a butt load of cash.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 13:59 | 5735406 Atomizer
Atomizer's picture

Just wait until they start pandering NATGAS as an alternative computer power source opposed to dirty/green coal cars built under solutions to global climate incentive’s.

 

http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy/natural-gas/natural-gas.html

Another Semi-peripheral cunt that will lose money under policymakers  Good luck twat.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:16 | 5735467 besnook
besnook's picture

that's 178 billion that isn't needed by the company, idle cash, that is helping pump the sandp. that money represents the welfare state the usa has become. most of it was made exporting jobs to china to re-import goods back into the usa. all of that re-import derived money should be taxed to help pay for the welfare state it helps create. at least then the money can flow back to the usa by leveling the labor arbitrage field.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:25 | 5735502 Babaloo
Babaloo's picture

They're not doing a pair trade.  They're setting up rate locks to take out the interest rate risk of buying Apple bonds.  When they distribute the new Apple bonds, they'll unwind their rate locks and buy back the treasuries they sold.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:26 | 5735503 Mike Honcho
Mike Honcho's picture

Buy an Indonesianesque country, declare a D.C. styled corporate government, make your own laws, sell iCrap around the world, appoint me to the board/cabinet.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 14:55 | 5735591 I Write Code
I Write Code's picture

I don't get it, are they going to use their foreign funds to buy their domestic bonds and pay themselves the interest, repatriating the funds tax-free?  No?  If they sell the bonds to domestic holders, then, um, ... I still don't get it, except they think they can pay less interest than their secular growth rate and this is a standalone.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:04 | 5735626 Chuck Knoblauch
Chuck Knoblauch's picture

Using RMB Hubs to sell corporate paper in foreign currencies?

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:16 | 5735703 random999
random999's picture

I dont understand apple, why would they just continue hoarding year after year?

 

What on earth could they need 160 billion offshore cash for??

Is there something bigger going on here? Are they waiting for better or worse days? Or is it just plain shareholder stupidity?

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:24 | 5735735 Chuck Knoblauch
Chuck Knoblauch's picture

I wonder how much of that money is narcotics money?

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 20:43 | 5737122 dinkum
dinkum's picture

random999, a few random comments to put you on the right path:

  • Tim Cook arguably has more relative importance to AAPL than did Steve Jobs.
  • Quit thinking of AAPL in the present
  • Think of AAPL in 10+ years when one machine is expected to cost $125m in current dollars. 
  • Think cost of R&D that is much greater than the $160 bn you discuss. 
  • Imagine your company is asked to spend $10 bn to perform R&D with a promise your company will become a preferred contractor, subcontractor for APPL products and systems. 

"Shareholder stupidity" and "market stupidity" questions should be considered in the context of current rulings on insider trading in link below:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/appeals-court-overturns-two-insider-trading-...

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:27 | 5735751 MEFOBILLS
MEFOBILLS's picture

Income taxes are regressive, especially for low income people who spend a greater proportion of their income on necessities than do rich.  Income tax came into being by way of 16’th amendment.  This amendment was part of progressive era bankster machinery installed starting in 1912.  Ultimately, 16’th and IRS were installed so taxpayer would backstop banks.  Remember TARP?


Apple and other companies take rents on the working population.  When Oligarchs don’t pay, somebody else has to, and that is the American middle class.  This is why a high value, tax paying middle class is disappearing, as the tax burden and other hidden rent costs are dissipating their energies.  Rent costs are also hidden in prices, especially usury mechanism of private banking.


  Even though the industrial revolution was recently put into hyperdrive with advent of high speed communications and smart machines (robots), wealth is being distributed into oligarchy via rent mechanisms.  Duped Senators and House members cannot see these rents because rental theory is not taught in schools, and they are on a bribery hook via 17’th amendment.  17’th is direct election of Senators, which was installed into law by our bankster friends starting in 1912.


Washington and lobbyist activity grew dramatically after progressive era reforms; State Senators became beholden to lobbyists and money interests rather than their electorate.  Federalism was undone and the former U.S. passed into history.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/business/apples-tax-strategy-aims-at-low-tax-states-and-nations.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Apple was a pioneer of an accounting technique known as the “Double Irish With a Dutch Sandwich,” which reduces taxes by routing profits through Irish subsidiaries and the Netherlands and then to the Caribbean. Today, that tactic is used by hundreds of other corporations — some of which directly imitated Apple’s methods, say accountants at those companies.

Without such tactics, Apple’s federal tax bill in the United States most likely would have been $2.4 billion higher last year, according to a recent study by a former Treasury Department economist, Martin A. Sullivan.

 

Apple also takes out loans because it is cheaper to borrow money and pay interest than to pay taxes.  To repeat:  IT IS CHEAPER TO BORROW AND PAY INTEREST than to pay taxes.  Shielding income in this way further funds private banker finance of wall street, and is yet another rent scheme.

Accountants and business color within the law, but our laws are perverse and have been altered to take rents, especially starting in 1912.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 17:10 | 5736273 Escrava Isaura
Escrava Isaura's picture

 

 

MEFOBILLS

First: Is there anything in our financial system that is not a fraud?

 

Second: I live in DC and I deal with small business. We just lost another account in Maryland because the business is closing down. It has been very slow from the beginning of the year. If keeps this way many won’t make to the end of the year, I believe.

 

Third: Dubaibanker, a Hedger, post this:

I say that it will be sometime in March.....or latest by June.....countries that are NOT insulated from the collapsing EU and US banks or the USD and EUR will also go down and take their economies, banks, real estate..everything down with them and another few million will be jobless around the world before June 2015, sadly!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-30/it-begins-energy-giant-chevron-suspends-stock-buyback-blames-cash-flow-squeeze#comment-5726005

 

Wonder if you, or anyone else, would care to comment.

 

 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 18:25 | 5736635 Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai's picture

"Without such tactics, Apple’s federal tax bill in the United States most likely would have been $2.4 billion higher last year, according to a recent study by a former Treasury Department economist, Martin A. Sullivan."

Oooh, $2.4 billion. Big whoop. Who gives a shit when we are adding a trillion dollars to Federal debt every year, and unfunded liabilities are increasing by tens of trillions every year.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:41 | 5735827 Dr. G
Dr. G's picture

Let's pause for a moment of sanity....CORPORATIONS PAY TAXES ON INCOME THEY EARN OVERSEAS.  They pay taxes in the country in which it is earned.  They just haven't paid US taxes on the money.  The US is the only civilized country that demands taxes on income earned (and taxes paid on it) in ANOTHER country.  It just so happens that US taxes are some of the highest in the world right now and that's why the company is doing it.  All you ZH'ers should also know that corporations don't pay taxes only individuals do.  Saddle a company with extra expenses and it just raises its prices.  A corporation is only a pass-through entity.

Why doesn't the US lower its corporate tax rate to the same lower rate as some of those "socialist countries in Europe" and then Apple would be happy to bring the money home!

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 18:31 | 5736668 Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai's picture

How about eliminating the income tax for human persons, and doubling it for Corporations? Yes, the corporation will simply pass the cost on to the consumer, but THE CONSUMER CAN CHOOSE NOT TO BUY THE PRODUCT.

Human persons cannot choose whether to pay income taxes-- that is mandatory.

It is clear to see one of these offers human beings free choice, the other is simply wage slavery.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 20:23 | 5737062 dinkum
dinkum's picture

Dr G, OP is about domestic corporations, not offshore corporations. 

"Home" is where the HQ is located. 

 

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 15:44 | 5735835 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

So U.S. citizens who work abroad are taxed, but U.S. corporations that sell abroad are not.

Oh yeah, and U.S. corporations are "individuals" according to the Supine Court.

"Swing low, sweet chariot...comin' for to carry me home.."

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 16:24 | 5736020 cwsuisse
cwsuisse's picture

"On a long enough timeline the survival rate of everyone......." Let us collectively donate our AAPL shares to the Greek government and invest in HUAWEI. This solves at least three problems: (i) the Greek debt (ii) NSA gets more info about Greece (iii) we own shares in a rising star

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 16:48 | 5736162 Nick Jihad
Nick Jihad's picture

I guess that helps to explain why wages in America are stagnant.  Any profits you earn abroad will be charged a 35% penalty, even if you plan to invest those profits back into the business stateside. What a wonderful way to incentivize the gutting of american industry.

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 16:58 | 5736221 franciscopendergrass
franciscopendergrass's picture

I have an answer to Apple's problem.  Get rid of the government!!!!

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 17:46 | 5736439 mcsean2163
mcsean2163's picture

What about pay taxes?

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 18:34 | 5736693 Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai's picture

They ARE paying taxes-- they pay US income tax on earned US income, and foreign income tax on earned foreign income.

What you want is for Apple to pay income tax TWICE-- once when they pay foreign taxes, and again when they bring the foreign money onshore. Apple is CHOOSING not to double-pay income taxes by keeping the money offshore.

Fuck the Feds and their sticky fingers. Those greasy fucks are adding a trillion dollars to our debt EVERY YEAR. How about they start by reducing spending???

Mon, 02/02/2015 - 23:05 | 5737580 johnmack
johnmack's picture

You guys do realise apple is giving a loan to itself right...? Theres no better way to reduce taxes than invent liabilities

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!