This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Yellen's "Humphrey-Hawkins" Testimony Preview: "Don't Rock The Boat"
Fed Chair Yellen will be presenting her semi-annual monetary policy testimony - sometimes called the "Humphrey-Hawkins" testimony - on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week. Goldman expects Yellen not to stray far from the message of the January FOMC statement and meeting minutes, seeing it unlikely she will preempt the Committee by sending a strong signal on whether "patience" will be removed from the statement at the March meeting. The testimony will probably not be a major market mover. Nonetheless, to the extent there are risks to our "don't rock the boat" expectation, Goldman thinks they are skewed toward a slightly more dovish tilt.
Via Goldman Sachs,
By way of logistics, Fed hari Yellen will be testifying to the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday and the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday. Yellen's prepared remarks are expected to be released at 10:00AM on Tuesday, in contrast to 8:30AM, which has recently been customary when the first day of testimony has occurred in the House. The same prepared remarks will be used for both days of testimony.
In the second day of last February's testimony, Yellen deviated a bit from her prepared text while presenting her opening statements, but this was probably due to the unusually long sixteen-day lag between the first and second day of testimony caused by snow delays. This year we would expect no difference.
The Q&A session will probably begin quite a bit after the scheduled 10:00AM start time—perhaps half an hour later—as it will take some time for Yellen to read through her opening remarks and for Senators to make opening statements. In addition, it is not uncommon for the hearing to start later than the officially scheduled time.
Regarding our expectations for the testimony, we expect Yellen not to stray far from the message of the January FOMC statement and minutes. Specifically, we do not think she will want to preempt the Committee's decision on whether the "patience" forward guidance should be retained, dropped, or amended at the March meeting, which would have significant implications for the market's view on the likely timing of the first hike. On the one hand, we think she is likely to acknowledge the recent strong labor market data. On the other hand, the broader set of US activity data has not been as robust recently, and the inflation outlook has dimmed. To the extent Yellen deviates at all from recent Fed communications, we think the risks are skewed toward a slightly more dovish tone.
Apart from the question of when the first hike will occur, which Yellen will probably not answer, a few key issues to watch include:
(1) In the December press conference, Yellen indicated that rate hikes could occur even if core inflation remained close to current levels—which at that time was 1.6% year-on-year according to the core PCE price index—as long as the Committee was "reasonably confident" that inflation would return to the 2% target over time. With core inflation having moved down to 1.3% YoY since that statement was made, oil prices declining further, and the dollar continuing to strengthen, has the Fed shifted its view on this?
(2) Does wage growth gain more prominence? In the past, the Fed has occasionally seemed to place considerable weight on wages as both a measure of inflation and also a cross-check on the amount of slack in the labor market. If wages figure prominently in Yellen's remarks, that would likely signal a slightly dovish shift given the lack of any appreciable pickup from the roughly 2% pace seen over the course of the recovery.
(3) Any shift in her assessment of the incoming activity data. Is the softness in December and January core retail sales a concern in light of the anticipated boost to consumer spending from lower gasoline prices? What about the downshift in some of the manufacturing sector data?
(4) How will the path of the fed funds rate look after the Fed decides to start hiking? Should we expect a fairly steady slow pace of rate hikes or more substantial data-dependency?
(5) Has the Fed shifted its view on balance sheet policy at all? Despite the sell-off so far in February, longer-term yields have been sustained at levels below what most observers would have expected a year ago, in part due to new QE programs in Japan and the Euro area. With this backdrop, would an earlier end to reinvestments or even asset sales make sense under some circumstances?
(6) Has the plan for exit shifted? Although the Fed has repeatedly referred to the fixed-rate reverse repo facility as a "backup" or "secondary" tool, the January minutes suggested that the cap on the facility size could be significantly increased or even eliminated in the early stages of the exit.
Although these questions will be important, we don't expect Yellen's semi-annual testimony to be a major market mover. With the advent of post-meeting press conferences, and more generally in the post-Greenspan era taken as a whole, the semi-annual testimony has diminished in importance. Indeed, Exhibit 1 shows that the average absolute change in 10-year Treasury yields around the semi-annual testimony has declined over time, and is considerably lower than the average absolute change around post-FOMC press conferences.
Exhibit 1. Semi-annual Monetary Policy Testimony Isn't What it Used to Be
The Fed will also release its semi-annual Monetary Policy Report at 10:00AM on Tuesday February 24, which is a roughly fifty-page document that provides additional background, charts, etc. supporting the Chair's testimony.
Typically, this document generates very little interest. However, the July statement that "valuation metrics in some sectors do appear substantially stretched—particularly those for smaller firms in the social media and biotechnology industries," received considerable attention.
»
- 4942 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Don't tip the boat over*
*Not a joke
#dontshootfreeprinting
#economyisrocksolidsowegottaeasemore
#weresendingmoneytoeuropebecauseeverythingsosooooofuckinggreat
Anybody know where I can get a Yellen bobblehead???
;-D
The woman is an evil fuckng cunt.
Give me a break. Has the whole world gone completely nuts when it is THE priority to worry about whether, or not, this person includes the word "Patient" in hours of total drivel in the face of uncritical questioning by an ill-informed, corrupt and compromised Congress?
We didn't go nuts, we've always been that way.
Yes but You must pull it from Jack Lew's ass. Good Luck.
my co-worker's ex-wife makes $80 hourly on the computer . She has been out of work for 10 months but last month her paycheck was $12310 just working on the computer for a few hours. look at this now... www.globe-report.com
What's sad is that if this garbage didn't net the occasional dumb SOB we wouldn't see this kind of spam everywhere.
Go kill yourself guy.
The boat needs to be rocked. Only then will we see that the boat has no captain, no rudder, and is taking on water.
All of us should rock the boat whenever we can. Partly to educate, and partly because it's fun.
IDK, wifi Barbie might be listening in...
It's probably stuxnet PRISM GI-Joe with the kung-fu grip....
wifi barbie. I had to take my childs back after reading that. LOL.
I cant wait to hear what Cods-whallop YELLEN will bullshit her way through this week. TUES-WED
Looking at this GREED - FEAR GREED INDICATOR here ==> http://bit.ly/1fMcakI
It looks like its all GREED, right now, and i get the sense that people are getting overly bullish, and its making others out there nervous.
I think yellen is easier to read than bernanke. And her lips do not move when she lies. LOL. haha.
All I know is you buy short term calls on 3x ETF index before these meetings and sell into the buying.
Rinse and repeat.
I know, messed up, fucked up world, but you gotta make bank. It's all rigged, just take your share of free easy money and move on.
I'll save everyone the time and pain of having to listen to that awful accent: "The economy is strong, but not that strong, we're not raising rates."
these idiots are never going to raise rates
Nope. And if you notice what they've done is reframed it down to rhe existence of one word, 'patience'. It's not even about raising rates, how much, or when. It's the "forward guidance" of a completely subjective word. It's absolutely absurd, and IMO, fucking juvenile.
They'll never raise rates. Strength is just around the corner, next year they'll say whatever. Been 6 years of this shit.
Man after viewing this site for 3+ years (I have only been posting for half a year) this shit just gets old right? The "No shit Sherlock" moments are endless....
Just wait till you been around here over half a decade.... perhaps one day ObieCare will cover the mental derangements reality can bring
But a word to the wise. Not everything here is "right".
The things, big underlying truths identified been pretty accurate.
What to do with them by the Peanut Gallery, not so much.
Most people here missed the stock market rally of classical proportions and been saying rates going higher... wrong on both counts
Uh huh uh huh uh huh
Status Quo Forever Bitchez.
Humphrey-Hawkins day, that's when the girls ask the boys to dance?
TIPS or GTFO
Someone needs to ask Janet Yellen a serious question like whats going to happen if rates rise on the now $18.1 TRILLION DOLLAR national debt?
Will we ever be at 4-5 % interest rates like back in 2008?
White tuna please.