This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Chart Of The Day: The Run For Nasdaq All-Time Highs
- 9644 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Submitted by Lance Roberts via STA Wealth Management,
With the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Averages already hitting real, inflation-adjusted, all-time highs; market participants have now turned their attention towards the Nasdaq Composite. Today's "Chart of the Day" takes a look at just how close, and far, the Nasdaq is from joining the "all-time" high club.
The chart below shows the Nasdaq Composite index in both nominal and inflation-adjusted terms using the CPI index as the proxy for the inflation adjustment.
As shown, the nominal peak of the Nasdaq Composite occurred in early 2000 at 5132.52. As of yesterday's close of 4960.97, the Nasdaq sits within striking distance of that nominal high.
However, in order for the Nasdaq to enter into the "real all-time high club" it would currently require an additional gain of 2149.52 points or an additional 43.3% gain from current levels. While that seems like a rather lofty goal, it would only require the top 20 stocks in the composite index to just a little more than double in value from current levels.
The table below shows the top 20 stocks in the Nasdaq composite by market capitalization. Interesting note: the top 20 stocks comprise 44.57% of the total market capitalization of an index that contains 2,962 companies (via Nasdaq.com)
From the time that Alan Greenspan first uttered the words "irrational exuberance" in 1996, the Nasdaq Composite surged by 4051.93 points to its intraday peak of 5132.52 in March of 2000. That was just shy of 4-years later.
Following the "dot.com" bubble reversion, the Nasdaq then rose over the next 4 years and 7 months to its peak in November of 2007 rising just 1517.95 points. As the financial crisis set in, the Nasdaq retraced back to near its previous lows.
Then, as Congress and the Federal Reserve leapt into action and began to flood the financial system with liquidity through bailouts, fiscal policies and direct liquidity interventions, the Nasdaq started its latest run. To date, that rise has encompassed 3583.13 points. However, in order for the Nasdaq composite to reach inflation-adjusted "all-time" highs it would currently require a total increase of 5732.65 points or more than the total gain of the Nasdaq composite from inception of the index to its peak in March of 2000.
The focus of participation in the markets has narrowed significantly in recent months. The chart below shows the rally that began with the onset of the Fed's last round of QE in December of 2012. During the first phase of the rally, the S&P 500 led the performance charge as money chased dividend yields and lower perceived risk. However, as the rally gained traction, the focus of investors turned from safety to risk and the broad Nasdaq composite took the lead.
Then, as the Fed began to bring QE to an end, the focus narrowed to the top 100 stocks in the Nasdaq which has maintained a performance lead over the more conservatively perceived S&P 500. (Note: Since the top 20 stocks in the Nasdaq make up 44.5% of the total Nasdaq composite index the narrow margin between the two indices is expected.)
In the current market environment, particularly where Central Bank interventions have effectively removed all perceived "risk" from the markets, my suspicion is that the drive to attain nominal new highs in the Nasdaq will be achieved in fairly short order. However, I am doubtful that the Nasdaq will be able to make the push to real "all-time" highs without a significant correction first. It will eventually happen; it is just unlikely to happen within the current cycle. But then again, in a market that seems detached from fundamental underpinnings - "anything is certainly possible."
While there are many that suggest there is "no bubble" in the financial markets at the current time, a simple look at the extreme elevation of prices over the last couple of years is eerily reminiscent of the late 90's. Given the very elevated levels of investor bullishness, margin debt and complacency, there is more than sufficient evidence that a mean reverting event is highly likely at some point.
However, at the moment, the perceived "risk" by investors is "missing the run" rather than the potential destruction of capital if something goes wrong. This is the opposite of what "risk" management and effective "risk" controls are about in portfolio management. While this is always the case in late stage bull-markets as exuberance overtakes logic, it is also why investors are damaged so badly during the ensuing mean reversion process.
It is always important to remember that for every bull market there will eventually be a bear. It is the nature of the markets and the reality of full-market cycles.
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
Copyright ©2009-2013 ZeroHedge.com/ABC Media, LTD; All Rights Reserved. Zero Hedge is intended for Mature Audiences. Familiarize yourself with our legal and use policies every time you engage the site: they're updated constantly without notice. Don't poke around on the site without reviewing our Cookie Policy; you expressly agree to our serving cookies unless they're disabled on your browser (instructions included). Happy surfing. Review our notice on Racial Discrimination.


Nothing to see here, this is completely normal.
Party like its 1999
Here comes trouble,,,,,the dreaded double top
15 year double top to boot
Crash helmets on and I'm not talking about the stock market
The markets are running on headline reading algo's and of course Wall St and the Fed control the headlines so this should end well...
Time to Celebrate!
Sock Puppets for All!!!!
No, wait,... Make that: Electric Cars for All!!!
The Federal Reserve's entire mission has been to beat investors into submission. Success will be failure.
50 shades of Yellen....
Serious question....why would Yellens statement about keeping interest rates low for even longer hurt Gold and Silver prices????
In short, 'paper covers rock'...rock crushes scissors, scissors cut paper...got it?
insert bait taker here ____^^^^^
They have to keep the dollar propped up by any means necessary and suppressing any alternatives is high on the list and Pm's are at the top of the list...
I make $720554 per hour by tricking retired people into buying bullshit stocks. Message me to find out how!
tryin' to muscle in on Obongos new deal, or just floatin' trial balloons?
Bernanke, is that you?
I'm done BTFD, Got no more money. I'm all in for the long haul to a heaven filled with mushroom clouds. I hereby await deliverance bitchez.
DAX new ATH today.. Please dont tell me you guys are still shorting that beast...
This is the opposite of what "risk" management and effective "risk" controls are about in portfolio management
What's that?
Portfolio management is when you charge 2% AUM to buy SPY for dumb people.
What risk? The Fed will never let the stock market drop. It's the perfect metric for bamboozling the sheeple.
Fed's toast, it's served it's purpose. There is a new sheriff holed up down the road and a new casino (for VIPs only). Still hammering out a few final details, which may require a few nukes, just hang tough..
"Bear markets have been eliminated". Wall Street Bankster, 2015.
The un-fed can drive it as high as they like. 20,000, 30,000 whatever. One thing they will die fighting against is the opposite direction.
They'll blow the whole fucking system up first!
BTFATH - Boy, This Feels Awful Treacherous, Honey
Keep calm, and buy AAPL...
http://www.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/p/keep-calm-and-buy-aapl/
Just more buying from Ma and Pa Kettle
What else should they do with that seven dollars they saved at the pump for nealy two weeks in a row?
Why is Google listed twice?
Because search engines are extremely rare and valuable. You'll notice if you eliminated the top 6 line items in the table the world would basically cheer. It would take about 60days to redeploy open source version sof required tech. Apple a bit different, they actually have a product line which includes hardware. Regardless, they could go down in flames and commerce would scarcely skip a beat. New linux based tablets in every pot! Yes, I'm being a bit silly, but not far off.
Class A and Class C.
Add the 2 together for total weight in Nasdaq? Apple + Google = 18% and the other 98 stocks have 82%? Talk about a rigged index, oboy.
Whats disturbing is that FB is trading at a price of (approx) Microsoft & Intel combined.
Surley this is a sign of the F'd up times we are living in.
Price of a stock is all relative. The metric you need to look at is the total market cap of a company, which is current stock price times outstanding float. Having said that all above mentioned companies are over priced.
I dont see this in stocks outside of the US..but then I'm not surprised, US has been printing non stop for 9 years, europe says alot but has yet to do a single month of QE
A bear took a crap in the woods -> Stocks up!
fuck the jews
"Real" inflation-adjusted? I think not! Gov't. numbers are lies by design...