This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
How Mario Draghi Is Putting Pensioners At Risk
Earlier today, we laid out all of the myriad reasons why Draghi-style QE won’t (indeed can’t) work. Some of these reasons are logistical (euro fixed income supply/demand imbalance) and some are structural (former easing efforts impeding current accommodation). We’ve also taken a hard look at the deleterious effects CB asset purchases have had on market liquidity and, by extension, price discovery, and volatility. Here, we present yet another unintended (we hope) consequence of monetization gone wild: underfunded pension plans.
Of course anyone with a basic understanding of the time value of money could have predicted this, so we’re sure it was in the back of more than a few peoples’ minds, but apparently the situation worsened materially over the past 12 months or so as the market began to try and front run the ECB.
Via FT:
[S&P] blames the sharp fall in long-term bond yields ahead of the imminent start of the European Central Bank’s €60bn-per-month asset-buying programme.
Such yields determine the “discount rate” that pension funds must use to calculate the present value of their liabilities: the lower the rate, the higher the liabilities.
S&P estimates that defined-benefit scheme liabilities will have increased 11-18 per cent, equivalent to €58bn- €92bn, in 2014, driven by the sharp fall in long-term corporate bond yields and only partly offset by the fall in long-term inflation expectations.
… and more from Bloomberg:
Among the measures S&P says companies may have to take to adjust to this new low-yield world are freezes on pensionable salaries, raising the retirement age, and closing plans to new or even to existing members.
So accommodative monetary policy, which is ostensibly supposed to stimulate aggregate demand thereby encouraging businesses to spend and hire, is now perversely causing people to work longer and preventing new employees from having access to a secure retirement. About the only thing worse (and more sadly ironic) than this would be if international loans designed to prevent insolvent eurozone countries from descending into Third World status were being repaid out of pensioners’ pockets — oh wait, that’s happening too.
Meanwhile, commentators seem to be gradually catching up to what we’ve been saying for years. Namely, that this isn’t working.
From BlackRock’s Peter Fisher, via Bloomberg:
“Quantitative easing, which is supposed to push investors into riskier assets, instead is driving up prices of low-risk assets “as we’ve seen in Europe today,”
“The Fed’s bond-buying program wasn’t much more successful.”
“It didn’t really work here, it worked at the margin as a little chase for yield. People want to hoard the best assets”
»
- 5657 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Eviscerate the pensioners. For 30 years they voted for the welfare state. it's only fair we rob them of their already bleak future.
Work until you die, peasants. And don't skip your measles shot, it works better than an Obama death panel.
Peas and Ants, again .... how about some oatmeal .... once in a while ?
same story in New Jersey http://hedgeaccordingly.com/2015/03/new-jersey-pensions-paid-600million-...
This would be funny as hell if it weren't so damn true.
I remember recently when I was an employee with a 401(k). I now prefer board chair acting as consultant. Fits my mood better. Bought the company car for a good price, too. "Mischeif managed..."
We hedged some folks...
Draghi? More like JP Morgan.
Is this a trick question?
When EVER in the ECB mandate have they EVER been able to(openly dictate monetary policy for a EU member State until this month?
Japan is failing miserably, and the ECB failure will be even MOAR EPIC, as a multitude of Nationalities square off with each other.
Hello Mr. Former Policeman and Mailman,
Our records indicate that you are collecting two pensions. Due to budgetary constraints, we will be rescinding the higher paying of the two to help pay recipients that only have one pension.
Have a great day!
Your local bureaucrat
Yes.
They will means-test all government pensioners ("it's only fair"). This will also happen in the U.S., sooner than people think.
If the Central Banks print money and buy government debt issues, forcing interest rates to unreasonably low levels, they can fund the underfunded government obligations for a while longer. By doing so, however, they eviscerate the underfunded private pension and insurance obligations. Private pensions and personal retirement accounts go kaput.
If the Central Banks don't print money to buy government bonds, allowing interest rates to rise to realistic market levels, the underfunded government obligations can't be met. Those without a private pension or sizable personal retirement savings face severe austerity. Anyone with a private pension or personal 401K retirement savings will be means-tested out of their promised government retirement benefits. That's the "buy-in/haircut" that will keep the underfunded government benefits shit-show going for a few years more.
No free lunch. Sorry Krugman, you Nobel-Prize-Winning shithead, Central Bank printing does not cause money velocity to go up and save the global economies. Your prize theory does not work in the real world.
They are banksters. That's what banksters do.