This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Artist's Impression Of Hillary Clinton's Campaign Trail

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Presented with no comment...

 

 

Source: Townhall

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 03/07/2015 - 00:41 | 5863954 hopefulbutwary
hopefulbutwary's picture

Also, some reference to taking White House furniture when she left.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 01:04 | 5863989 dexter_morgan
dexter_morgan's picture

She was just 'borrowing' it till she got back there........

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 00:57 | 5863975 dexter_morgan
dexter_morgan's picture

She is a problem child   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edaM9Hy4iKg

I'm a problem child
I'm a problem child, yes I am
I'm a problem child
And I'm wild

Make my stand
No man's land
On my own
Man in blue
It's up to you
The seed is sown

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 01:11 | 5863991 KuriousKat
KuriousKat's picture

Reminds me of Dune..The Spice must  flow..

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/05/gold-mine-hillary-cli...

 

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, sat on the board of a self-described mining company that in 2012 received one of only two “gold exploitation permits” from the Haitian government—the first issued in over 50 years.

 

The tiny North Carolina company, VCS Mining, also included on its board Bill Clinton’s co-chair of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC), former Haitian Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive.

 

The Rodham gold mine revelation is just one of dozens featured in a forthcoming bombshell investigative book by three-time New York Times bestselling author Peter Schweizer, according to a Thursday statement from publishing giant HarperCollins.  The publisher says the book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, is the culmination of an exhaustive one-year deep dive investigation into the nexus between the Clintons’ $100+ million personal wealth, the Clinton Foundation, and the decisions Hillary made as Secretary of State that benefited foreign donors, governments, and companies.

 

VCS’s coveted gold mining exploitation permit was apparently such a sweetheart deal that it outraged the Haitian senate, since royalties to be paid to the Haitian government were only 2.5%, a sum mining experts say is at least half the standard rate. Moreover, the mining project in Morne Bossa came with a generous ability to renew the project for up to 25 years. Nevertheless, the fledgling company proudly touted its luck in landing the deal.

 

“This is one of two permits issued today, the first permit of their kind issued in over five decades,” reads the only press release under VCS’s “news” tab on its scant website.

 

According to USAID, $3.1 billion have been dispersed since the 2010 Haiti earthquake.

 

Clinton Cash is said to contain “seismic” and “game-changing” revelations that far eclipse anything presently reported on the Clinton Foundation’s violation of its agreement not to accept foreign government money during Hillary’s tenure as secretary of state.

 

In 2011, Schweizer’s book Throw Them All Out exposed insider trading by members of Congress and became the subject of an award-winning CBS 60 Minutes story and “started the STOCK [Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge] Act stampede,” according to Slate.

 

“Bestselling author Peter Schweizer coins a new term to describe the unique way in which Bill and Hillary tend to mingle their political, personal and philanthropic interests: the ‘Clinton Blur,’” says HarperCollins editor Adam Bellow. “Schweizer’s scrupulously sourced and exhaustively  researched book raises serious questions about the sources of the Clintons’ sudden wealth, their ethical judgment, and Hillary’s fitness for high public office.”

 

The book is slated to hit bookshelves nationwide May 5th.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 04:33 | 5864175 radiobomb
radiobomb's picture

good info KK. thanks....

looks like crony capitalism, nepotism, and flagrant self-interest mixed with deceit, lies, and misdirection. 

Sounds like trad politics to me.

 

 

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 12:11 | 5864581 Anunnaki
Anunnaki's picture

Hope his book sells more than Hill the Shills's latest literary cash grab. Which flopped at the book stores last year

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 01:16 | 5864002 dexter_morgan
dexter_morgan's picture

she has no remorse   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYz1aqXnwu0

No mercy for what we are doing
No thought to even what we have done
We don't need to feel the sorrow
No remorse for the helpless one

War without end
No remorse No repent
We don't care what it meant
Another day Another death

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 07:39 | 5864241 hootowl
hootowl's picture

One word:  Psychopath!

We may not survive two psychopaths in a row squatting in the white mosque.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 08:32 | 5864275 Arnold
Arnold's picture

A hogan can be consecrated ground in many religious beliefs, unfortunately Sharia Law is not one of them.

 

*caution*

 

 

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 03:49 | 5864153 Johnny Moscow
Johnny Moscow's picture

I dont' see Whitewater in there or the whole Vince Foster episode (he committed suicide, presumably largely due to her emotional abuse of him at work). 

She's a man-hating, warmongering, corrupt, lying, cheating Feminist who has zero business being in office let alone the president of the United States.  But you could say the latter about Bush and Obama so it is what it is I guess. 

She's corrupt to the core too. And her policies are extremely misandrist - she'll be like Eric Holder of the "rape culture", "wage gap" and other Feminist lies out there.

But let's face it the mainstream media will play the "we need a woman president" ad infinitum and blame any opposition on "misogony."

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 04:32 | 5864174 Dre4dwolf
Dre4dwolf's picture

Hillary Clinton, the candidate who is married to a pedophile.

Thats all I see.

I could see more, but I dont have to.

She has no chance of being president.

The name of "Clinton" is unanimous with murdering thieving pedophiles.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 09:05 | 5864301 CHX
CHX's picture

Former president, slugging along to being president again... Does she like to drink the blood of new born baby girls, me wonders.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 09:10 | 5864304 dogismycopilot
dogismycopilot's picture

The Clintons are politicians who are shaped by history, rather than shaping it.

They must esort to underhand methods to to help them obtain their personal agendas.

They recognize they are not loved by the majority of Americans.

As a result they must become masters of political intrigue, in order to eliminate their opponents as soon as possible and hold on to power for as long as they can.

Achieving major objectives for the nation is not a priority for them as this will forcce them to take risks that could affect their own personal interests.

They are, in essensce, political scum and the drawing is on the money.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 09:13 | 5864311 ultramaroon
ultramaroon's picture

Here's a link to her senior thesis, wherein she romanticizes Saul Alinsky with every ounce of her under-graduate zeal.

 

https://nukegingrich.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/hillaryclintonthesis.pdf

 

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 10:51 | 5864395 BlackVoid
BlackVoid's picture

It does not really matter who is elected. Mostly irrelevant.

You will be disgusted by him/her whoever it is in 1 year.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 11:58 | 5864539 Winston Smith 2009
Winston Smith 2009's picture

It makes no difference what slug is elected as POTUS. Those who might actually rock the corrupt boat are never permitted to appear on the ballot by those in charge of vetting candidates with campaign money. The public money gravy train status quo must be maintained. The peripheral issues not involving money (ex., guns, gays, and god) which the oligarchy really doesn't give a damn about are used to bring the "useful idiots" to the polls and enable the continuation of the status quo by theoretically "legitimizing" the vetted candidates with their votes while maintaining the illusion of citizen control.

From the 2014 Princeton study "Testing Theories of American Politics - Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens":

"Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organised groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.

When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organised interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the US political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favour policy change, they generally do not get it.

To be sure, this does not mean that ordinary citizens always lose out; they fairly often get the policies they favor, but only because those policies happen also to be preferred by the economically-elite citizens who wield the actual influence."

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 23:07 | 5866058 thebigunit
thebigunit's picture

From the 2014 Princeton study . . .

One more pointy headed Ivy League study that got it wrong.

Unless you're trying to claim that Obama is secretly working for "economic elites and organised groups representing business interests."  Too clever by half.

Sometimes a communist is just a communist.

Sun, 03/08/2015 - 02:07 | 5866315 Winston Smith 2009
Winston Smith 2009's picture

As I pointed out, when it comes to issues involving MONEY, THEY ALL work for those who fund their campaigns who are... wait for it... "economic elites and organised groups representing business interests." Dems and Reps are simply two sides of the same bought and paid for coin thanks to our private money driven campaign process and our rediculously long campaigns that require that money.

Sun, 03/08/2015 - 05:26 | 5866461 thebigunit
thebigunit's picture

The only alternative I know of to a hunter gatherer economy is capitalism.

Do you know of any capitalist economies that aren't run by capitalists?

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 12:18 | 5864603 Emergency Ward
Emergency Ward's picture

 

 

-- "We need a strong alpha pantsuit female in the White House"

-- "If you are against Hillary you are a rapist"

-- "She came, she saw, she slaughtered"

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 12:54 | 5864686 Anunnaki
Anunnaki's picture

If Rahmn Emannuel loses his mayoral re-election - which I don't think will happen - Clinton will lose. Likability, arrogance and trust

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 13:08 | 5864722 Anunnaki
Anunnaki's picture

5 reasons Hillary Loses

1. obama fatigue. Same reason Mc Insane didn't have a chance
2. Without a minority on the ticket blacks and Latins go back to underwhelming turnouts. Esp. latins who are mad at the Dems over lack of political will on immigration
3. She is too old, with too much negative baggage. Nonpolically inclined voters just don't like her
4. Midwest blue states wobbling against Dems: Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania could go R in 2016
5. This scandal opens a wdge to the possibility of having to find a fall back option if the scandal doen't fade away. Just that thought weakens her inevitabilty and gives space to ask the question sgainst the Imposed forced support within Dem circles of her candidacy

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 22:57 | 5866028 thebigunit
thebigunit's picture

Reason number 6: George Soros.

He threw her under the bus in 2008 when he fell in love with a skinny black Saul Alinsky community organizer from Harvard Law School who was "clean, articulate, and had no Negro dialect."  And who would read a teleprompter if he got to live in the Big House where the white people live and play a lot of golf.

If Hillary tries to pull herself out from under the bus, Soros will be stomping on her fingers.

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 18:33 | 5865481 thebigunit
thebigunit's picture

OOOOO-WHEEEEEEE!

Maureen Dowd just effed Hillary deep and hard.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/08/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-only-the-s...

I didn't know this was possible.

Sun, 03/08/2015 - 01:31 | 5866284 HolyfieldsOtherEar
HolyfieldsOtherEar's picture

Q: What's the difference between Hillary and the Chicago Cubs?

A: The Cubs have accomplished something.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!