This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Weirdest Thing You'll See Today
Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,
You know that we talk a lot about the insane level of government interference in our lives. About what we can and cannot put in our bodies. The amount of interest we’re entitled to receive on our savings. Etc.
But I’m noticing now even more ridiculous trends of governments wanting to get involved in people’s sex lives.
Last year the Danish government promoted an initiative called “Do it for Denmark”, encouraging Danes to travel abroad and have sex while on holidays. They even have a pretty racy Youtube video featuring a scantily clad gorgeous blonde waiting to do her duty for her country and procreate.
Singapore as well has a catchy jingle about going out and making babies, brought to you by the same guys who did the Mentos theme song.
The Swedish government actually spent taxpayer money on its new genitals song, so it can start indoctrinating children early on how they can make babies.
Here in Japan, which has one of the lowest birthrates in the world, the government is desperate to find solutions to what it calls its libido crisis.
According to their data, Japanese men aren’t terribly interested in sex and the women find sex to be bothersome.
Japanese being expert process engineers are coming up with a government solution to reengineer sexual desire in their country.
(I have to imagine that if this solution reached US soil, the government option would include the smooth sounds of Barack Obama whispering some pillow talk: “C’mon, lemme give you this big tax cut, baby…”)
Easily the most ridiculous solution they came up with is to impose a ‘handsome tax’ on attractive men. I thought this was a headline from the Onion, the greatest news source in the world, but it turned out to be true.
The idea being that if you tax handsome men, then less attractive men would have more money and hence be able to attract women.
Zerohedge covered this in fantastic detail—I encourage you to check it out. This is not a joke.
The thing that many of these countries have in common, Japan, Denmark, etc., is a rapidly declining birthrate.
A declining birthrate is disastrous for an economy, particularly for an ageing place like Japan.
Ironically, the oldest person in the world turned 117 years old yesterday—and no surprise that she’s Japanese. In fact, Japan is home to one of the oldest populations in the world and has one of the longest life expectancies.
Curiously they also have one of the largest pension programs in the world. You put all that together and you have fewer and fewer young people paying more and more of their income to support a disproportionately large population of retirees who are living for decades after they stop working.
Each one of these governments is trying to find a solution to fix this unsustainable fiscal problem.
In Denmark they seem to think that people aren’t going on vacation enough. In Japan they think it’s a problem of sexual desire. But in actuality it has everything to do with cost of living.
Month to month, year to year, it’s hard to notice the subtle changes in costs of living and standards of living, but after a long period of time it’s easy to look back and remember how things used to be.
You used to be able to support a family on a single income. You used to be able to afford medical care and higher education.
It’s often said that the greatest expense that someone will have in their life is his or her home. That’s total nonsense.
Now, I’m not saying it’s not worth it, but the biggest expense most people will have is family, and particularly children.
And after years and years of suffering through pitiful, destructive policies that have chronically made people less prosperous, it’s no surprise that they’re coming to the conclusion—you know, we can’t really afford to have a child right now.
There are consequences to conjuring money out of thin air. There are consequences to destructive policies.
So destructive in fact that central bankers and politicians even have the power to make a population disappear.
How ironic that they try to fix their own problem by trying to introduce themselves into our bedrooms.
»
- 160289 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Politicians are all whores, so they are the experts on selling out.
spiking the foods with all those testoerone reducing additives has consequences for politicos/bankers.
It makes them a little more secure-in the short run-
Want children? You need families, with a place for women AND MEN.
How to fix this?
Too bad, too late.
Govs allow RoundUp which kills sperm count:
http://permaculturenews.org/2014/03/21/glyphosate-roundup-human-male-infertility/
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Glyphosate_Roundup_and_Human_Male_Infertility.php
muslims pick up slack.
Wait a sec. The deal is to go on vacation and procreate abroad. What the fuck's wrong with domestic screwing?
I am getting sooooo confused with some of the goobermont mumbo-jumbo
Gay rights.. abortion., .price inflation of necessities and education, tax and government fee increases..
Adios, white man.
Pssst .... does she come with nipple clamps?
http://www.debtcrash.report/ This site moved but the History and Intro is a great read and perfect for anyone who is new to our very sad monetary system.
Well, since we're all-in on Keynesian insanity what would be wrong with just PAYING women to have babies?
If we're gonna go retard, why not go FULL retard? Yes, I know you never go fall retard, but we've tried everything else and it's failed.
How about just paying women for sex? It's a novel idea and might just work!
Kids cost a lot of money---they are the most expensive toy you can buy. And it takes time and responsibility to raise a child. Most young people today are too selfish to want to give up anything like Xbox or TeeVee. And if you end up with a brat or two, how is it worth it?
Government trying to keep the slave trade going.
Kids don't have to cost a lot of money, but they should cost a lot of effort and energy to raise them properly. I know too many people that don't want kids because it'll cut into how they spend their time and money. I appreciate their honestly and the fact that they just don't have kids anyway because they think they should. But it's also a shame because they are smart and hard working and the type of people you'd want raising the next generation.
how does this jibe with the georgia guidestones and the soros/gates/rockefeller eugenics program?
So Simon Black lives in Japan?
(I expected Chile.)
So this Danish chick goes to her doctor for a follow-up visit after the doctor had prescribed testosterone for her. She was a little worried about some of the side-effects she was experiencing.
"Doctor, the hormones you’ve been giving me have really helped, but I`m afraid that you’re giving me too much. I’ve started growing hair in places that I’ve never grown hair before."
The doctor reassured her. "A little hair growth is a perfectly normal side effect of testosterone. Just where has this hair appeared?"
"On my balls."
Add kidney failure to Monsanto's RoundUp issues:
http://naturalsociety.com/chronic-kidney-failure-5-times-higher-glyphosate-areas/
Im all "in"
Watch closely at the 1:00 minute mark. BOING! That's not a co-inkydinks my friends. :-)
Can you say obvious Captain? Too funny! :-)
I'd DO HER FOR DENMARK !
Doing your part to "keep the race pure", no doubt?
Do it for Denmark,
Meet Nikita.
Thank you for not having a picture of an old balding commie man from the '50s.
I'd do her for Denmark!
And Norway, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Belgium, Sweden, Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Spain, Portugal, Russia, Poland, Croatia, Czech Republic,
Take a break for dinner...
Then on to Japan, China, North and South Korea, Vietnam, Australia, Palau.....
eirik, how does race impact what you choose to eat? it must since you see it in everything..when it rains it rains hardest on blacks and when the moon shines it shows only eyes and teeth on our melanin blessed population, so much injustice so little time.
The decorative fabric wall covering at 00:37 is a premonition of the Eiffel tower at 01:00 ,, lots of phallic easter eggs here...
imo there are entirely too many humans on the planet now. exponential growth of most things for very long is a bad idea. it won't seem as difficult once the baby boom dies.
But if everyone else is doing it why not win at it? Just like the race to debase.
and please...if you have children. Don't let them grow up to be sociopath government scumbags hated by all but the lowest of the creepiest low.
Raise them right and keep them away from the influence of these mutants.
i lied yesterday...i lied....i dont come here for the articles...i come here for the brazil ass shot and the hookers...
Wait a minute. Europe, and Denmark, especially, are ultra-politically correct. Do they have a companion "have gay sex abroad" and "have farm animal sex abroad" commercials for their peoples of other sexual preferences? Seems like a major lawsuit, and government hammering, should be brewing here.
The easiest way to get lots of babies is to make them profitable like we do with our welfare system.
Tax credits for each muncher you poop out. It does wonders in the USA.
Verdad?
Fuck yeah! Do it for Denmark!!! (They've got a bitchin' welfare system.)
Why do you think you don't need a licence for a child.
Do three hail mary's and 4 scotch and soda's and your sins will be forgotten.
This stupid story somehow equates having sex with having children.
Insanely idiotic assumption.
Anyone can have sex.
Raising a child from birth to college graduation is a crazy huge committment.
Monetarily especially.
Who is going to pay for that? The government?
Yeah right.
"And it takes time and responsibility to raise a child."
Please... Since when does **any** inner city Obama voter do either of these to raise their little gang-bangers? And we tax payers (not tax takers) pay for it to boot.
It takes a village to raise a gang banger.
Scotty:
A large portion of young people are unemployed or underemployed living in their parent's basements. Can you blame 'em for not wanting to have kids under those circumstances?
Yep, there is really a limit to what you can learn from the inter webs , despite killer ap development.
Little shits come from big shits - Yoda
Pay women for sex? How about paying men?
Another option would be to remove the absurd taboo on good, healthy, population-increasing rape.
yes you might be paid for sex. and someone, probably, would be willing to rape you. but you have to put yourself out there. just typing stuff on a blog isn't enough.
Denmark could charter rape flights to Syria and Iraq. ISIS is laying pipe down there, bitches.
They are already paying women to have babies. I'm not saying what kind of babie, but babies.
We're already paying women to have babies big time with our welfare system.
Kinda like 50 Shades of Grey being banned by Indonesia. "We cannot condone this depravity," said Muhammad Adul, accompanied by his 9-year-old wife.
knukles,
Enslavement comes in many forms. The chick in 'Fifty Shades Of Grey' chose hers freely, but 9-year-old children have NO CHOICE in the matter (female OR male).
Your comment reminds me of a song by the Eurythmics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeMFqkcPYcg
Does Indonesia have the Bomb yet? Pakistan does, and so does India. Something like 37 countries have the Bomb (but NOT Israel! NO WAY! {sarc}).
LOTS of sick synchopathic mother fuckers are in places of power in the leadership in all the nations, I think. Iran has been weeks away from getting a Bomb since 1981 (officially). Saddam COULD have bought (or built) a bomb, you know (and so could have M'oh'amar) YELLOCAKE URANIUM from NIGER, and ALUMINUM TUBES; and (*gasp*) CENTRIFIGES! HEY, maybe NIGER has one! I mean, you NEVER KNOW about this stuff...
If Syria or the Eastern Ukraine get one, then OH, SHIT! Lurch and Billary have BOTH had wet dreams (oops, I mean 'BAD DREAMS') about this scenario. HELL, Bibi has taken to wearing 'adult incontinence products' (as has most of the duly-unelected selections in the U.S. Congress, who were forced to stand in order to let their Depends have a chance to absorb their fecal matter, simply discussing IRAN).
Do you think Kim Jong Un (or whoever) in N.K. likes 9-year-old girls? Are they Taoists, or secular Taoists, or reformed Taoists, or radicalised Taoists, over there behind the Bamboo curtain? HE has a BOMB, you know.
A few years ago the government of Quebec, Canada, concerned that its low birthrate would lead to its French-language status within mostly English-language Canada being lost, started paying women to have babies.
I light of the immense costs of having children - financial, emotional, lifestyle and time - paying people to become parents makes some sense.
But there are inner-city communities in the USA that are willingly copulating and procreating, with nary a care about financial or lifestyle consequences, or about parenting or marriage. Chicago with its 85% of children being raised in single-parent homes comes to mind.
Modern welfare systems allow a woman to marry the state for support. Who needs a man for anything other than sperm? The Danes have a cradle-to-grave social safety net. Why not promote its use to increase its population, if population growth is the aim?
One thing puzzles me though. Why are Danish women being told to go on vacation to copulate? Are there no Danish men willing to copulate or able to impregnate? Or are the Danes so lacking in energy, or otherwise occupied, in their daily lives that they cannot find the energy or time to copulate?
Then there are the concerns about chemical pollution, plastics giving off artifical estrogens, birth control pills disrupting natural pheromone signals, and other concerns about our environment and food supply decreasing sperm counts and interfering with natural bodily functions, including sexual activity. Maybe the Danes are trying to send their young women to unpolluted places to find higher sperm counts and natural rhythms.
Or maybe the current generation of young Danes has taken in the message of the feminists that men are unnecessary (and smelly, uncouth, violent, and generally not socially acceptable) . If a man is seen as not necessary or desirable, why should a man or woman bother to have relations with the opposite sex? Are young Danes on a sex strike?
Eliminate convenient abortions, and watch populations skyrocket in the lower quartile demographic.
They tried that in Australia, the parents received a $5000 "baby bonus" for every child born. They ended up with a lot of children born to the wrong parents and for all the wrong reasons which became a massive drain on the welfare state. Full retard !
Same here in Canada with the same deplorable results.
You can raise and train a LOT of jihadis on $5000.
how many? i mean really well trained, not just shooting the ak 47 at "something" and running through used tires. more like knowing how to splice video into network news feeds and use micro nuclear devices to demolish skyscrapers.
Generally it takes 10 people in the supply chain to support 0ne Boot.
I believe the Jihadi s have cut that down a bit.
Hey Knucks, after all the Euro-bondage she is used to, using nipple clamps and wax is the only way she can cum.
Yes, she comes with nipple clamps...IF you tighten them properly...
...While I'm not usually into this "Global Citizen" bullshit, in this case I'll make an exception. I feel the need to do my civic duty and breed as many as humanly possible, for the greater good, of course. Denmark or bust....
<==-- Do her for Denmark
<==-- Her elbows are too pointy
Something is very fine in the State of Denmark. How can anybody NOT go for Denmark?!
Define who is "white"?
Our son came out very light for a "mixed" child, but he might just as easily have come out as ebony as a black dude. In either case, he'd still be my son, and he would still represent my family line being passed on. So, where is the dramatic "end" you ramble about, and which is supposed to convert me to a stone age Bible Belt conservatism flavored with a bit of Ku Klux Klan?
White supremacist types amuse me. You are overgrown children.
"White" is someone having both parents in the caucasian category. Similar algo for any other race of choice. Children resulted from mixed parents are, well... of mixed origins. Your ranting is baseless (pretty dumb too...)
Heheh. Looks like I hit a nerve.
The irony about white supremacists is that they typically represent the least intelligent and the least educated of all "whites". According to their own dogma, that renders them an inferior subgroup which should be prevented from breeding.
You only hit the floor with your head, when your dad dropped you...
It seems you're the one with the Hit Nerve. Your reaction is the use of invectives directed at others who don't fall for your Marxist propaganda. Could you just be furious because nobody here's fawning over your New Age baby? Come on, why don't you just type it out, you're dying to. Shouting racist is was you live for. He, he!
There is that pesky 1-1.5 SD IQ delta for some ethnicities. Funny you should bring up intelligence as a perjorative . . .
The irony about white supremacists is that they typically represent the least intelligent and the least educated of all "whites". According to their own dogma, that renders them an inferior subgroup which should be prevented from breeding.
That is what you support Eirik...You, as a socialist, seem to prefer eugenics as Hitler, as he was also a socialist. Is that not what you'd like? That is what your trolling states repeatedly.
That is the greatest irony of all. You do not even recognize practicing your own type of racism. It is so laughable that you are so blind to your own racism while you point your finger at others claiming your own self righteousness.
And then you think that we have not noticed? How much of a fool are you to believe that you are the brightest candle here?
Your have a very lower class perspective on "white supremacists". The most "intelligent", "educated". "rich", and politically connected whites are typically every bit as racist. The might prefer the term "useful idiot" to "house nigger" or "field nigger" but the disdain and sense of superiority is the same, even if the notion of "their proper place" involves slightly more pimped out slaves quarters.
@Urban Redneck
Larsen is in fact lower class. He believes that by gulping down on the elites' pablum an producing a mixed child he'll automatically belong to the club. What a naive Useful Idiot he is, he fell for the whole enchilada - Hook, line & Sinker! There's One Born Every Minute.
How much is some zio-organization paying you to attack whites who commit the unpardonable sin of not wanting their country and culture destroyed?
agreed, eirik.
the zh neo-nazi brigade ought to go and have genetic testing done on themselves, so they can see what % they are of black, hispanic, native american, asian, etc.
it would be sure to wake people up from their myths.
You, like Eirik, have the "Z" (for Zionist) on you foreheads, programmed to intentionally dilute the integrity of all races.
Inbreeding tends to result in sickly offspring, liable to suffer from inheritable diseases and a diminished intellect.
You appear to be a tragic example of the phenomenon.
Breeding with low IQ people tends to produce low IQ offspring.
Low IQ and a gigantic clown dick. Is the trade-off worth it?
Quite practically, a 'gigantic clown dick' is NOT worth the 10-15 point IQ discount it comes with. If you're Mandingo, you might use your big stick 6 hours per day. One can use one's brain ~18 hours per day. And a creative brain makes all sorts of tools.
you had me at gigantic clown dick.
Apparently the danish gubbermint wants all its fertile lady parts drooling for one. Which is weirdissimo.
@ Larsen
Too bad your mom was too dumb to abort you!
Are you talking about yourself Eirik? You're the result of an incestuous liaison? You're attempt at projection is quite pathetic & you're obviously irreversevely damaged.
Well you can make a couple of observations about inbreeding taking Ashkanazi Jews as an example.
1)They have the highest IQs of any group in the world by far-asians are a distant second. You can pretty much write off all of modern physics, cosmology and chemistry without their critical contributions.
2)They have many very specific genetic diseases like Tay-Sachs due to this inbreeding responsible for (1).
So, inbreeding certainty has disadvantages but low IQ isn't one of them-ask Ed Witten (yes, he's likely the most intelligent person in the world and a Jew) whose father and mother were also distingushed scientists. As Newton showed, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and it does so following the inverse square law.
May I suggest 19 th century European royalty as an opposition view point?
They could have simply been impaired due to drinking red wine out of pewter goblets, or some other affliction.
What a hypocrite you are Zio Clown! You wouldn't marry a shiksa if your life depended on it.
I used to be a dedicated Hebrew-sexual but I would never marry her.
She came with a Jewish mother.
The ultimate turnoff.
I used to be a dedicated Hebrew-sexual but I would never marry her.
She came with a Jewish mother.
The ultimate turnoff.
You should also keep track of your lineage for future generations. There was a news article a while back about a girl who developed cancer, but they couldn't find a suitable match as a bone marrow donor. They had to go back five generations to find her ancestors came from a small village somewhere in Italy. Fortunately, there were still a few people left in the village - they found a good match which allowed her to be treated for the cancer.
This has nothing to do with one race being better than another, but the fact is, Blood isn't water. So don't piss on other people's ancestors.
Thank you Zionist multiculturalism for the "mixed" mushed minds of the Eirik Magnus Larssen types who are methodically spreading white genocide.
Multicultural supremacist types amuse me. You are an overgrown infection, sweeping the globe.
Please seek the attention of an experienced psychiatrist.
@Eirik Magnus Larssen
You're using Orwelian language now Trostsky, & according to you he needs to be reeducate with your rigid dogmas in order to be dumbed down. Just get the hell out of here totalitarian slug!
@ Eirik Magnus Larssen
You should consult one to cure you from xenophilia.
I must admit as a white man that the so called "white supremacicts" are a damn poor specimen of my race, physically and mentally. You would think they would be embarrassed to draw attention to their inferiority but I guess they are too god damn dumb.
Why don't you mention Other Supremacists dumbo? It's convienient to bash white folks innit? Vapid lemmings like yourself are a dime a dozen & I certainly hope your kind doesn't reproduce.
I really don't think your wish will come to pass. Progressive men rarely fear or hate women, of any ethnic or religious background. Contrast this to the cynicism or the unrealistic expectations which are rife among the frustrated conservative males here. Progressive men are considerably more likely to find a compatible lifemate at some point, for the simple reason that we do not actively reduce our fishing pool to a drop of water.
Your bitterness and inability to live in a world without borders have turned you into your own worst problem. Blaming others is always easier however.
So "progress" is indiscriminate fucking? Or have they simply failed in luring in foreigners with free shit?
Their parents must be so proud and absolutely hate their racist ancestors who failed at genetic diversity. The only way these "whorney" women will get pregnant is by accident or if their loving government benefactors pays for the child's upbringing.
"progress" appears to be the complete abandonment of morality or ANY social values.
@ Eirik Magnus Larssen
Spoken like a true Cultural Marxist!! I must admit you checked all the boxes, your indoctrination is complete. Lol! Progressive, you call yourself a progressive? The dismal state of the entire planet is because of so-called progressive applied ideoligies like yours. Btw, I'm female.
@ Eirik "Progressive men are considerably more likely to find a compatible lifemate at some point, for the simple reason that we do not actively reduce our fishing pool to a drop of water."
Yes, Progressives like you are notorious for justifying your gourmandizing on any seafood that moves... young girls, young boys.
Eirik, after viewing your youtube comments and google page, it appears to me you are a black man trapped in a white mans body. I'm quite sure you were crushed when you realized your child was white. Soo much for your shot at NBA or NFL money.
"...inability to live in a world without borders..", ....."Blaming others is always easier however."
-----------------------------------
Spoken like the slimy International Socialist you are... oh, and here's looking at you
What the fuck is a "white supremacist" anyway. Sounds like a label you attach to people when you want to win an argument. Just like "racist" and "misogynist" and "anti-semite".
Funny, I don't hear the terms "black supremacist" or "asian supremacist" too often. I wonder why that is?
In a word, fuck off.
It is actually your condition and failure to empathize with them and not theirs. They are at a place (economic/physical/developmental) where they are more threatened by those from other groups/tribes. Either they are threatened or are immediately competing and so react in the way they are able, mostly complaining. Previously, people bonded together to push others out to ensure the viability of their tribe. Now, the elite invite in others to compete, thinking that they can control the system and it will not break down and kill them also.
Elites and especially Progressive eliites think they can control human nature. They can to an extent. But IF it breaks down, people better be ready because all hell will break loose.
Get the fuck outta here with that. You want box-a-rocks dumb? There is an ethnicity that tests box-a-rocks dumb. It aint the racist white supremacists. Good thing one can get paid in the NBA to run, shoot, and steal. . .
How bout we divide between those who will stop and help you fix a flat versus those that will drive on by? Or simply help you when you need a hand without a bunch of drama?
In cum inequality.
Bingo. The white male has been so marginalized
in the workforce and in mass media that their position
is " I'll go out drinking with my friends and visit the massage parlor tomorrow.
I don't think its white babies getting aborted most of the time...but I Understand your point
Well, she convinced me;)
You can screw her all you want, but if you think about procreating remember how much it costs to raise a kid nowadays (college not included):
http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/18/pf/child-cost/
Not a problem! All the newly created worker drones will gladly give their (m/h)oney to the government!
Average cost/child doesn't seem to concern the people I see on Maury every day.
YOu might as enjoyed getting screwed the the fun way. THe bad way is still coming.
I don't think they "give a fuck" anymore.
Domestic screwing is handled by the government. You fuck each other on vacation and when you get home the government will make sure you are screwed for the rest of your life.
fuck the government before it fucks you.
stole that from thomas jefferson.
On gov. welfare!!!
...the smooth sounds of Barack Obama whispering some pillow talk: “C’mon, lemme give you this big tax cut, baby…”)
He ain't gonna cut taxes for whites or Christians. He needs those tax slaves to keep working. Their money is used to feed all the low lifes, like Saint Trayvon and Saint Michael, in addition to the newly arrived brown skins.
+1,000 to dave0
No world for white men.
Sure there is a world, just cut off your balls, you'll be fine.
You are the only one that appreciates them anyways.
IF you try to keep them, then everyone will try to bash the everliving shit out of them.
Cut the fuckers off and be done with it.......
I would have thought that all good catholics would churn out enough offspring to cover this AND keep all those priests happy.
They do. You should be grateful!
Support the cause! Make a donation to your local diocese the next chance you get. Walk into any church, light a candle and toss a silver coin in the basket.
You do not have to believe in any of their shit to support a good cause.
Not all Catholics breed the same.
Puerto Ricans and Irish have much more than say Germans.
Just look at the number of pubs and janitors in NYC...
"... and Irish have much more than say Germans."
This is why God invented whiskey...to keep us from ruling the world!
nice and poignant.
Hey we are German/Irish. Doing our part.
Hmmmm, could it be that men around the world are realizing that marriage and children will not only be costly, but can be snatched away from them at any moment, and are opting out?
"snatched" away.... Ha ha ah ah ah ah ha ah ha ha ha ha ha
Is it bad I don't know what nipple clamps do?
Any man who gets married today is a FOOL. He is basically entering a long term lease program, run by the gov.(pimp). He will be expected to pay a balloon payment upon exit. The exit date is usually (more than 2/3rd's of the time) determined by the prostitute. If he makes the mistake of getting her pregnant, his income will garnished by a gov. madam, with a hyphenated last name, wearing a black robe. This whole system is being run on fraudulent fiat currency! They have done everything they can to discourage marriage, except mail you a direct threat of incarceration. DO NOT get married!
marriage tax
betting someone half your shit, that you can keep them happy the rest of their life.
marriage
The incurable desire to pay someone else's bills. Marriage.
Goes both ways. The fact is that people are not a monogamous spieces to begin with. Marriage is an institutional conception that is an unnecessary enabler. People would be a lot more responsible with their naughty bits if they were solely responsible for their actions.
I find the shear idea of anyone but myself and the other consenting person defining the terms of our relationship incredulous. Why people would enter into these legal contracts based on the notions of emotion is beyond me.
Don't get me wrong, I have a nothing against the family unit, but if it has come to this point then obviously something has gone arwy....
Marriage was supposed to be to establish a life time commitment...to the family, not just the wife. First we saw the explosion of divorce which attempted to break that promise with a penalty fee, and then we had government welfare step in to take the load off of dad again. Now marriage is a sham, a contrivance of pomp and ceremony that everyone and their dog can get in on and has less meaning that buying a new car on a seven year loan.
I am on my third wife (of 22 years) and have never had children. All of my marriages were about convenience for me and social and moral standing for my wives. Marriage as designed and intended is dead and has been for quiet a while. This is why it is stupid to fight gay marriage or any other as it was yesterday's battle long lost.
Whether we like the notion or not, sex was designed for one purpose and that was procreation. Any sexual activity we enter into that does not have that goal is perverted. That said, there is nothing all that wrong with perversion unless we lie about it and claim it is not.
Bullshit on the procreation part. Sex is about bonding and oxytocin. Why would females have concealed ovulation? Baboons asses turn red and they're only sexually receptive during ovulation. Female humans, well you never know when they could get pregnant and, if you play your cards right, they're usually willing to have sex. It's not all about procreation. Stress relief, bonding and good clean fun.
I fuck my wife of 16 years 3-5 times per week, depending on our schedules. I still enjoy it. She keeps her shit in good shape too. I let her know my expectations on that before we married, plus she was already that kind of girl but I let her know if she whaled out I'd probably look elsewhere.
Go throw your wife on the bed, get "perverted" and don't have a guilt trip about it.
The older generation still struggles with the idea that we are an evolving mammal and have done so since the 50's. Marriage as it was invented by the church, is the perversion of social interaction. Many animals, including humans partake in sexual intercourse as a form of interaction. There are many species that do not, and are therefor monogamous. This doesn't mean to say it should be done irresponsibly, but trying to fight your natural tendencies is going to fuk your head. I bet if you were to compile some big data on the subject you would find some explicit trends among both the married and divorced.
The happiest relationships I've had are open and understanding with an emphasis on the rights of the individual. It allows for more honesty, and a chance for deeper bonding because the individual is free to find what they are most inclined towards and express themselves fully. Most people grow and change their wholes lives, and therefor their tastes and interests do as well. I'm not saying you can't share this experience with someone, but why have the state involved at all!?
Personally I have never been married, but I can have an enjoyable conversation with anyone I've dated in the past. Never had a dispute over property, never required interference from the law. Sometimes we even have sex just for the fuk it!
Another little fun fact, human beings are the only mammal on the planet that actively engages in homosexuality, and there are many, yet publicly condemn it.
Why do you suppose that is?
"DO NOT get married!"
That is why more and more people have chosen to avoid this legally binding Contract, called "Marriage". Good for them!
You still can and SHOULD do your part as a parent, but it should be determined by MUTUAL consent by both parties, with an explicitly WRITTEN Agreement, officially Notarized and put in a His and a Hers Safety Deposit Box.
If I were a young person and especially a well-to-do person, I'd make sure that I have an iron-clad equivalent to a Pre-Nup in said Agreement. That way, to really know that I'm being married for "me" and not my money, the Terms would be that the upscale or fancy-shmancy Lifestyle is not a lifelong or unconditional Entitlement, but very much a Conditional Entitlement, that automatically expires when the Offspring reached Adulthood (18) and may be renewed under new Terms by mutual agreement.
This short-circuits all the BigGov BigChurch and BigNGO intentions to harness and control the male studs, which are being turned into barn animals, under the present system of breeding-control.
The bonus in this situation is that gold-diggers (think Tiger Woods' wife) can forget about getting hundreds of millions after faking it for a few years and pretending that they don't know about the Philandering. Additionally, it allows a more affluent man to sire and raise a number of children with different women, and improve the odds of having a truly worthy successor (among the few duds and mediocre kids).
After all... "What's Love* Got To Do With It?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pu8KFlfzk3Y
Darwinism at work.
* Modern Romantic Love (as we know it) is an 18th century invention of the Western European elite (aristocracy and bourgeois city-zens). See... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romance_%28love%29
Book authors catered to this class, and pretty soon the merchants realized that it was "good for business", as it gets the horny guys with money to spend, spend, spend.
Monogamy was a political solution, which the church backed as a result, to the 'problem' of a new war lord coming to prominence by making marriage alliances with multiple families, aka polygamy.
This was actually quite a common medieval way to build a powerbase.
"Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same".
skip ahead to :50. http://tosh.cc.com/video-clips/wne713/it-gets-way-worse---uncensored
"DO NOT get married!"
More and more people are realizing that marriage is only for gay people!
Billions of people living in Middle East, China, South East Asia, and Former Soviet states would disagree with that meme.
This would imply that we, as a culture, are the current aberration in regards to gay marriage.
and may i add any woman who gets married is a FOOL also
Women own the children,
and men own the bills.
Fuck that!
In my divorce, I was the breadwinner. I got ALL the debt. He ran it up, not me. I had to pay him every month for years. I lived carefully for many years. I finally paid all the debt off. Since we parted ways he ran up another $100,000 plus a mortgage, he is currently in bankruptcy. That is after I gave him a clean slate.
We had joint custody of my son.
You guys think it is about gender, but they go after the bread winner.
I could tell you so much more that would make you cringe, the things he said and did to justify running up all the debt with me, the lying, hiding, credit cards at 28% and higher I did not know about.
I even gave him back the jewelry he gave me to try to help him get on his feet.
I'll stop. I know many of you guys have sob stories too. But it ain't about women always taking it from men.
STD stands for Sexually Transmitted Debt as well as other things.
the exception proves the rule.
welcome to our world.
The exception is that I am a female who out earned the male she was with. I outearn most men, indeed most US Family's combined incomes (I know that is not saying much!).
It is not about gender, gender is typically correlated with income.
Given your experience would you blame anyone, male or female, who hesitates to commit matrimony?
Now that is a fair question. Hesitation makes sense. Marriage is optional.
You are 100% right: They go after the bread winners.
I have come to know many women who were in your shoes to shatter any stereotypes I may have. The women were not only the breadwinners but they were dreadfully betrayed by their rotten husbands too.
They go after the bread winners.
Who is they? is a worthwhile question.
The popularized battle of the sexes is actually an illusion. The true battle is between predator/parasites and producers. The battle transcends sex.
I believe the class of family lawyers and judges who enforce so much famlly-destroying law are very immoral people who areprobably very bad parents or spouses themselves. They probably married for money or for convenience themselves. Punishing people through divorce probably gives them the jollies.
They go after the breadwinners because most are male, when the percentage of women who become the breadwinners reaches a higher level, the dynamics will change . The feminists the liberal media will start to moderate their positions, for instance as in jail for the breadwinner if they lose their job and are unable to make very high child support payments. For now as long as the percentage of women adversly affected remains low, not much will change, as the percentage of women adversely affected rises to a more significant level you will see a push for fairer more nuanced court decisions.