This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Oil Glut And Low Prices Reflect An Affordability Problem
Submitted by Gail Tverberg via Our Finite World blog,
For a long time, there has been a belief that the decline in oil supply will come by way of high oil prices. Demand will exceed supply. It seems to me that this view is backward–the decline in supply will come through low oil prices.
The oil glut we are experiencing now reflects a worldwide affordability crisis. Because of a lack of affordability, demand is depressed. This lack of demand keeps prices low–below the cost of production for many producers. If the affordability issue cannot be fixed, it threatens to bring down the system by discouraging investment in oil production.
This lack of affordability is affecting far more than oil products. A recent article in The Economist talks about LNG prices being depressed. LNG capacity ramped up quickly in response to high prices a few years ago. Now there is a glut of LNG capacity, and prices are far below the cost of extraction and shipping for many LNG suppliers. At least temporary contraction seems likely in this sector.
If we look at World Bank Commodity Price data, we find that between 2011 and 2014, the inflation-adjusted price of Australian coal decreased by 41%. In the same period, the inflation-adjusted price of rubber is down 58%, and of iron ore is down 59%. With those types of price drops, we can expect huge cutbacks on production of many types of goods.
How Does this Lack of Affordability Come About?
The issue we are up against is diminishing returns. Diminishing returns mean that as we reach limits, it takes increased resources (usually both physical resources and human labor) to produce some type of product. Oil is product subject to diminishing returns. Metals of many kinds also are becoming increasingly expensive to extract. In many parts of the world, a shortage of water makes it necessary to use unusual techniques (desalination or long distance pipelines) to obtain adequate supply. The higher cost of pollution control can have a similar effect to diminishing returns on products with pollution issues.
When we graph of the cost of production of resources subject to diminishing reserves, the result is similar to that shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The way we would expect the cost of the extraction of energy supplies to rise, as finite supplies deplete.
What happens with diminishing returns is that cost increases tend to be quite small for a very long time, but then suddenly “turn a corner.” With oil, the shift to higher costs comes as we move from “conventional” oil to “unconventional” oil. With metals, the shift comes as high quality ores become depleted, and we need to move to mines that require moving a great deal more dirt to extract the same quantity of a given metal. With water, such a steep rise in diminishing returns comes when wells no longer provide a sufficient quantity of water, and we must go to extraordinary measures, such as desalination, to obtain water.
During the time when cost increases from diminishing returns were quite minor, it generally was possible to compensate for the small cost increases with technological improvements and efficiency gains elsewhere in the system. Thus, even though there was a small amount of diminishing returns going on, they could be hidden within the overall system.
Once the effect of diminishing returns becomes greater (as it has since about 2000), it becomes much harder to hide cost increases. The cost of finished products of many kinds (for example, food, gasoline, houses, and automobiles) starts rising, relative to the income of workers. Workers find that they must cut back on discretionary expenditures in order to have enough money to cover all of their expenses.
How Diminishing Returns Affect the Economy
There are at least three ways that diminishing returns adversely affects the economy:
- Lower wages
- Less ability to borrow
- Squeezing out other sectors of the economy
The reason for lower wages relates to the fact that, as the cost of producing a commodity rises, the worker is, in some sense, becoming less and less productive. For example, if we calculate wages per worker in units of oil, as oil becomes more expensive to extract, we get something like this:
Figure 2. Wages per worker in units of oil produced, corresponding to amounts shown in Figure 1.
A similar chart would hold for other resources that are becoming more difficult to extract, or whose cost of production is becoming higher because of greater pollution controls. For example, we would expect the wages of coal workers to be falling as well.
Also, as we shift to higher cost types of energy, we become increasingly inefficient in energy production. Based on a 2013 analysis, in the United States, there are more solar energy workers than coal miners, even though we use far more coal than solar energy. The large number of workers required to produce solar energy is one of the reason that solar energy tends to be high-priced to produce.
When we look at wages of workers, we indeed see a pattern of falling wages, especially for workers below the median wage. Figure 3 from the Economic Policy Institute shows that even the most educated workers are experiencing declining inflation-adjusted wages.
A second major issue affecting affordability is debt saturation. Affordability is favorably affected by rising debt–for example, it is a lot easier to buy a new car or house, if the would-be purchaser can obtain a new loan. If debt levels stay the same or fall, this becomes a problem–fewer goods can be purchased.
Governments in particular are reaching the limits of their borrowing capacity. They cannot keep adding new debt, and remain within historic debt to GDP ratios.
Another way debt saturation occurs relates to young people with student loans. They find it too expensive to borrow more money for a new car or for a home. Furthermore, the fact that wages are not keeping up with price increases for many workers reduces the borrowing ability of the workers with lagging wages. This is true, even if no student loans are involved.
As mentioned above, a third issue is the fact that the inefficient sectors tend to squeeze out other portions of the economy by gobbling up a disproportionate share of workers and resources. The use of all of these resources doesn’t produce a lot of goods in the traditional sense–a desalination plant is expensive, but the amount of water produced per dollar of investment is not large. To the extent that the high costs of inefficient sectors are passed on to consumers, consumers find that they must cut back on discretionary spending. This cut-back in spending squeezes out discretionary spending, leading to cutbacks in discretionary sectors, and to reduced employment overall.
Figure 4. Author’s view of the effect of diminishing returns on economy.
Wishful Thinking by Economists
Back before diminishing returns started becoming a major problem, economists created models regarding how the economy would react to higher cost of energy production and other symptoms of diminishing returns. In their view, if the cost of oil extraction rises, oil prices will rise to match these higher costs. Alternatively, substitution will take place, or technological changes will allow greater efficiency, or customers will cut back on their use of the high cost product. Somehow, these changes will take place without a particularly adverse impact on the economy.
Unfortunately, the models don’t correspond very well to what happens in practice–at least not for very long. It takes inexpensive energy to produce goods that workers can afford. Higher priced energy does not work well in this regard. Feedbacks that are not reflected in economic models reduce both wages and debt, making it harder to buy goods requiring the use of more-expensive energy products.
Furthermore, if the price of one commodity, for example oil, rises, then countries with very much oil in their energy mix find themselves handicapped in trade with other countries that use less oil in their energy mix. For example, a country that depends on tourism (which depends on oil use) for very much of its revenue, such as Greece, finds it difficult to find customers when oil prices are high. Lack of revenue can lead to financial problems for the country.
Because of the networked way the economy really works, prices for commodities can’t rise for the long-term. They may rise for a while, as consumers and governments borrow more, in an attempt to continue business as usual. Ultimately, though, the situation can’t “work.” Customers can’t afford to buy more homes and cars, unless their own wages are rising in inflation adjusted terms, and governments can’t collect enough tax revenue.
The issue we are dealing with here is lack of affordability. This is what will bring the system down–not the high priced scenario imagined by many. Decline will come through low prices, and a glut in oil supply, even if we are not looking for it from that direction.
Can commodity prices rise again?
It is not all that clear that they can rise again. It would be a lot easier for commodity prices to rise, if the problem were simply inadequate prices of one commodity, leading to a lack of that commodity. If the problem is inadequate demand for crude oil, coal, LNG, and iron ore the problem is much greater–especially if wages are still lagging.
»
- 8998 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Venezuela claims it has has 200 billion+ bbls of oil reserves (pumping costs?).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves_in_Venezuela
Get them on a national security threat list el pronto.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/09/obama-venezuela_n_6831890.html
Especially if they are going to trade oil for gold.
To quote dubya: Them are terrorists.
Remember Aaron Russo saying Nick Rockefeller told him in 2000 that that the neocons were going to go after Venezuela.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ead_1205684318
So where are those guys from the '60's that said by the '90's we'd have run out of oil?
Maybe studying abiotic oil and whether or not it is a real phenomenon.
Strange when you see Saudi oil reserves not change after decades of pumping.
Either they are lying (very possible) or they have an abiotic oil source (don't know) or a bit of both.
http://news.yahoo.com/chevron-sell-more-assets-amid-drop-oil-prices-2014...
12 MBPD is not coming from decomposed dino shit I know that...
Anyone who predicts anything 30+ years in advance is either unwise or full of shit.
Ounce of Gold
12 pieces of Paper
The glut of oil and slumping prices are because of the diminishing returns of extracting scarce resources. Got it.
Whatever. I guess it couldn't have anything to do with being in a FUCKING DEPRESSION, now could it?
Inefficient sector = government
Why is that so hard to say?
Not to mention, an apparent fissioning of global trade between East and West. There was a previously high polarization of consumption and production, with the consumption almost overwhelmingly residing in the West, and (low-end) production* concentrated in the East.
What tends to follow after such extreme polarization is increasing protectionism, reduced trade flows etc. Obviously oil prices are heavily linked to industrial capacity and transport. These issues and the depression are related of course. Bodes ill for the energy industry short-term. The market will consolidate, and eventually the price will get hiked just on account of having fewer solvent players and fewer oligopolies, or even just a monopolist.
*Skilled assembly and high-tech. production was also present in some European nations but.. the majority of productive capacity was still in the East.
.
Peak oilers trying to make sense of the world after the collapse of their meme. Sad.
This has to be the most moronic article on oil yet posted here and that is saying something becuase most of them are exceedingly stupid, this is by far the worst yet.
LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!
Just noticed it's Gail the knownothing actuary.
Great on mortality and morbidity.
Actuaries are just accountants that found bookkeeping far too exciting.
"This has to be the most moronic article on oil yet posted here and that is saying something becuase most of them are exceedingly stupid, this is by far the worst yet."
WOW, you provide so MANY arguments to support this statement. I'm sorry that your industry is taking a beating and you may not have a job soon. Too FUCKING bad. I for one like the idea of sub $50 oil. May it go down to $20!
Isn't less investment in oil production a good thing?
I didn't read anywhere in this post about the change in regulations that allowed commodity pricing to get out of control in the first place.
Just about everything skyrocketed in price regardless of demand once full scale leveraged speculation was allowed in commodity trading.
Goldman Sachs and other hedge funds have been hoarding commodities to create artificial scarcity in ordrr to drive prices higher. Mass speculation and a thousand fold increase in the volume of traded contracts drove oil, copper, wheat, corn, etc to levels far above historical means. A drop in iron ore makes rigs less expensive to build, lower oil prices mean it costs less to expend energy exploring.
Even with a 40% reduction many commodities simply are still too expensive for a working world economy. The good news is mass drops in commodity contracts can rebalance production and consumption once equilibrium is reached. There is still a lomg way to fall to reach that point however.
Because of the idiotic expansion of leveraged bets in commodity trading, pricing can not fall to historical levels without blowing up the financial system. Price is based on what someone who has no use of a traded commodity is willing to pay because he believes there is someone else willing to pay more. That is just insane on every level causing massive distortions in the supply chain. Iron ore needs to drop, steel prices must fall, oil must fall to around $30. If this happens base production costs can once again result in affordable manufactured products for mass consumption.
Having to pay $7.50 for a fast food hamburger and $12 for a toy that cost $4 six years ago doesn't work. $3 gasoline doesn't work either. Now it can work if wages and salaries kept up with inflation, but they haven't. In six years the average consumer's purchasing power has been cut in half and these idiots wonder why there is something wrong with the economy.
Wage rising at the rate of inflation is the ‘goldilocks economy’. So-called “equilibrium’.
Oil has been financialized so that futures and other derivatives form a paper market far in excess of the physical commodity. Bankers pushed their luck, hoping to bilk the world as Peak Oil took hold. Sorry, Charlie. $20 oil doesn't seem unreasonable. Gas was 25 cents a gallon when I got my first car.
My first car cost $600 in 1972 and it was a 13 year old TR3 and gas was $.27. My next car was a 75 Corvette bought in '76 for $8500 and it was $9800 new the year before and gas was $.60. Try buying a Corvette today and see what you pay. The new fully loaded '76 Camaro I passed up for the Vette was $6500, what is a new fully loaded Camaro going for today? About 10 times that. A barrel of oil at the time I go the Vette was $10, when I got the TR3 it was $3. Your pricing model is fucked up here. Oil was too cheap for too long and then it got too expensive, that is the way it goes with oil. I think a fair price will be around $80/bbl when the dust settles later this year.
It's all about debt and the lack of savings. That's what's causing deflation.
Technically, we re in a credit boom that started with president Andrew Jackson
Lack of savings comes about when you have to spend all you have to fill your belly.
It's all about debt and the lack of savings. That's the cause of deflation. Look out below.
Chinese gdp goes from 8% to 3%.
Maybe a factor?
Even 3% is only the result of massive malinvestment.
Who cares anymore? The same shit storm will be here in the morning. And the day after, and the day after that. Then a few days later, it'll all be negative interest rates and Spam sandwiches
You'll be lucky to afford spam. Most don't realize how dire the situation is.
No fear sign up for Barry gas care! Oil companies get bailed out! And John Q Six Pak gets his tank filled up for free!
WINNING!
what low prices?
gas is $4/gallon in my part of #Failifornia, as of yesterday.
But, it does look like we've run out of cheap, "affordable" oil and the knock on effects are as, if I followed the above reasoning, we are now experiencing.
Ignorant person writes about oil, hilarity ensues as commenters display even less knowledge of the subject.
Enlighten us then, oh wise one
Why is this worth reading?
Global Recession - didnt fix 2008 [TBTF]
This has so little to do with the finite nature of resources and so much to do with the infinite supply of money in the last 5 years. When money is free, malinvestment is the norm. Now we're dealing with the gluts and busts of malinvestment.
Tired of the Peak Prosperity horseshit. Peak oil has been imminent for 50 years, and now this glut is yet more proof of its imminence? No.