This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
"Monetarism Hasn't Worked Anywhere" - Reality On China, Finally
Submitted by Jeffrey Snider via Alhambra Investment Partners,
China remains an export economy no matter how hard they try to convince the world they are moving otherwise. The idea of creating internal “demand” as a means to extricate marginal changes from everybody else is undoubtedly a good idea, even a noble one, but the reality of China as it exists top-down isn’t conducive for such a transformation. Further, that just isn’t realistic under the global conditions that have persisted since the Great Recession was declared over.
In that respect, there isn’t much to separate what is occurring now from the Great Recession itself. Certainly there exist positive numbers in economic accounts where deeply negative numbers predominated during the “event”, but the major factors that inaugurated the dislocation remain especially unsolved and more often than not misunderstood. China’s predicament falls into that category.
The idea of reform, to reiterate, is as much a rebuke against orthodox monetary economics as it is of China. The Chinese did in 2009 as the textbook says, and embarked upon tremendous “stimulus”, both monetary and fiscal, which “aggregate demand” “should” have led to rebirth. Even if it didn’t, the re-igniting of the global economy from all the other central banks following the same textbook should have resolved any lingering deficiency. “Extend and pretend” is as much about time as anything, and even massive imbalances can be covered and eventually removed by robust and sustained economic advance.
Instead, monetarism hasn’t worked anywhere, leaving little sustainable “aggregate demand” to sustain all the massive financial imbalances created for it. That is the most poignant reckoning out of the PBOC’s reform ideas, that in order to gain even the smallest fit of “demand”, even artificially, it takes an inordinately large asset bubble. Such massive inefficiency is highly problematic in so many ways, but not the least of which under these conditions where bubbles exist almost everywhere without the requisite recovery in economic function and activity.
Therefore the entire point of “reform” in China is an assault on the senses of mainstream commentary as well as theory. Janet Yellen says that the US is booming, even if the data doesn’t agree, so who is the PBOC to proclaim otherwise? Further, orthodox economists tell us over and over that there are no asset bubbles and that monetarism is not just most effective it is the only option – we know this because a credentialed economist is on TV almost all the time and is quoted in almost every mainstream news item in order to reinforce the narrative.
Reality has a way of mugging even the most hardened ideological positions, in particular where ambiguity has been totally drained. The past six months’ data on China, PMI’s aside of course, has left little optimism about anything except unfounded hope for monetary softening. The economic figures were the worst since the Great Recession, and even worse than that drastic decline in a lot of cases, by far. Retail sales were the lowest since 2001, as was “fixed asset investment”, an important indication of Chinese economic fervor. Industrial production fell to 6.8% growth, well below the 7.8% “analysts” were expecting, to yet another new “cycle” low.
It is clear now that this is not a “transitory” problem, so the implications for much more than China are becoming undeniable. Even Reuters has finally conceded to connecting the dots:
The Chinese economy has had a rough ride in the last 15 months as a property downturn compounded slackening growth in foreign and domestic demand and persistent industrial overcapacity. A widening corruption crackdown also has weighed on everything from investment to retail sales. [emphasis added]
It’s surely not a winning endorsement of “global growth” which would at least include the US “miracle.” Further, the same article seems to have finally appreciated what the PBOC is undertaking in that context.
Policymakers have cut interest rates twice since November, and in early February reduced the amount of cash that banks must hold as reserves (RRR), freeing up fresh liquidity to flow into the economy to offset rising outflows of capital.
But because those adjustments so far have been largely defensive in nature, economists say, they haven’t translated into lower real interest rates or increased investment. Chinese companies are cautious about expanding in the face of weak business prospects, and bankers are wary of a spike in non-performing loans.
That is the entire point of “reform”, as the PBOC has no interest in maintaining bubble imbalances anymore. Their entire focus is “defensive” because they have little choice under these conditions. That means accepting the economy as it is on its own, as bad as that may get, in order to at least attempt to restore financial sanity and even a little discipline. These are all anathema to orthodox monetarism, which is why most economists simply cannot grasp the point of the endeavor. As if to leave no doubt about that last point, Reuters quotes a credentialed economist who is clearly confined by the bubble of such narrow theory.
“Activity data surprised the market on the downside by a large margin, suggesting that China’s first quarter GDP growth could likely fall to below 7 percent,” ANZ economist Li-Gang Liu said in a research note.
“In our view, the extremely weak data at the beginning of the year suggest that China needs to engage in more aggressive policy easing, and we see that a reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cut will be imminent,” he said, adding that stimulus measures rolled out since last year seem to have had limited effect.
Good luck with that; the PBOC has already proven it is accepting of this reductive growth trend, as is the government and its continually lowered GDP “target.” “Aggressive policy easing” will be left for those economies where monetary awakening remains, as ever, nothing but a mathematical inequality.
- 6211 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -





China is transforming from a major commodity exporter to a capital exporter,' [...] 'The large going-out of Chinese capital means the country is able to participate in the restructuring of global industrial, supply and value chains, which are the keys to foster new competitive advantages
You know, it would be nice if the comment section was used for, well, comments, and not for a desparate parasitic attempt to siphon traffic.
Stated in an earlier post by yours truly...China is fucked...see above charts....
How long is a China man. But and however its part and parcel due to the weakness of the Good ole 70% non consumer spending of the U.S.A.
Since we dont make sheeit...sorry China...We fucked you, it was nice while it lasted.....
"We fucked some folks"
The is complete BS....on Wall Street and Washington they are rolling in money!
But WS and DC fiat don't go to China for cheap shit, it goes for quality shit....somewhere.
China is about to spend a large amount of the trillions of debt it's owed re-running the USA in the 1970's.
The EPA, but backed by science and the penalty is death.
Not only that, they're going to push Coal >> Nuke >> Solar.
The fundamental thing you need to understand is that money is not the goal for China: it's a means to an end. Something I think the USA forgot, and look where you are now.
They're also going to go hard into solving the northern desertification issue, but you didn't hear that here. (Beats the crappy nonsense that Cal is doing - come back to me when you've put 10,000,000 warm bodies into replanting small plants).
Oh and insects. 21st C burgers will be made out of protein reshaped nuggets and burgers from insect protein. And before you barf... that's very very much more sanitary than the mechanized reclaimed meat put into your food.
And, Bank of South Korea just joined the rate-cutting party...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-12/bank-of-korea-unexpect...
http://olduvai.ca
Don't worry, the Chinese will find a way out, like the developers who sell all their unsold inventory to their employees.
Developers' Great Escape: Dump Homes Onto Newly Hired Employees. http://investinginchinesestocks.blogspot.com/2015/03/developers-great-es...Someone needs to show this article to Fisher. Yep... the strong dollar is great for the U.S. economy. /sarc
Caterpillar Faces ‘Aggressive' Komatsu Fueled by Yen - Yahoo Finance
"the PBOC has already proven it is accepting of this reductive growth trend"
How did it prove that, exactly? It appears that this 'proof' did not make its way into the article...despite this being the whole point of the article.
In fact, the only actual data in the article, despite the motives attributed to it, seem to indicate the EXACT OPPOSITE:
"Policymakers have cut interest rates twice since November, and in early February reduced the amount of cash that banks must hold as reserves (RRR), freeing up fresh liquidity to flow into the economy to offset rising outflows of capital"
We are being told that these policies are not expansionary, and are in fact 'defensive' ... simply because they say so.
For this National Government and central bank, as well as all others, ignore what they say.
Pay attention to what they do.