This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The 9/11 Commissioners Were Conspiracy Theorists
9/11 Commissioners Admit They Never Got the Full Story
The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into a real 9/11 investigation:
- 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue
- The 9/11 Commission chair said the Commission was “set up to fail”
- The Commission’s co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”
- 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”
- 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”
- 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”. When asked in 2009 if he thought there should be another 9/11 commission, Cleland responded: “There should be about fifteen 9/11 commissions”
- The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”
No wonder the Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 – Bob Graham – and 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a “PERMANENT 9/11 commission” or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it.
Some examples of obstruction of justice into the 9/11 investigation include:
- An FBI informant hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000. Specifically, investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House. As the New York Times notes:
Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence ….The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers.
- The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government “minders” obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses (and see this)
- The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements
- The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times
- As reported by ACLU, FireDogLake, RawStory and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001
Both the 9/11 Commission Investigation and 9/11 Trials Were Based on Unreliable Evidence Produced by Torture
9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:
Those who knew about those videotapes — and did not tell us about them — obstructed our investigation.
The chief lawyer for Guantanamo litigation – Vijay Padmanabhan – said that torture of 9/11 suspects was widespread.
And Susan J. Crawford – the senior Pentagon official overseeing the military commissions at Guantánamo told Bob Woodward:
We tortured Qahtani. His treatment met the legal definition of torture.
Indeed, some of the main sources of information were tortured right up to the point of death.
Moreover, the type of torture used by the U.S. on the Guantanamo suspects is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed that the the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating false confessions. (and see this, this, this and this).
And according to NBC News:
- Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured
- At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told interrogators information as a way to stop being “tortured”
- One of the Commission’s main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ
- The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to themselves
The 9/11 Commissioners doubted the information from the government ... they were obviously just tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorists.
»
- advertisements -
Disinformation masquerading as honest assessment. F*ck off, hasbara.
Bullshit -Building 7 (or 1 and 2) did NOT fall because of being hit by planes or routine office fires -it's not a matter of did we know and let it happen. Pull your head out. It's clear who did it, why they did it and who was involved -only some of the details are not yet known. if you don't know -you are dishonest or too lazy to look at the overwhelming evidence.
Building 7 and BBC's announcement 15 mins early are some of the most powerful evidence of this ugly inside job. That said, there's a million pieces of evidence. This should not surprise anyone when the event is so complicated, involves so many entities and disciplines and the modern technology instantly records and distributes it. That's what these idiots and bad guys failed to think through. The internet is powerful competition to the official narratvie...and that applies to any subject and any crime.
Didn't Flight 93 hit Bldg. 7? Me Bad, forgot the pilots gained control and were then shot down.
Actually Oswald's Magic bullet finally came to rest and took it down
You mean that Arlen Specter's Magic pristine bullet finally came to rest and took it down?
Islamic terrorism was created by US/UK to provide a cover - the Mossadeq toppling was too obvious so the method changed
Bin Laden claimed credit? What a dumb fucking statement. What ever makes you think that anything he was 'reported' to have said or any recordings of such that you think you heard were not complete fabrications direct from Langley? And furthermore yoiur BS about 'possibly' knowing what was going down is some more shit. There was nothing left to chance. You might have 'possibly' known, but I'll guarantee you that the boys at the CIA knew full well what was going down. As well as mr cheney. I do beleive that mother fucker should be waterboarded till we get the truth.
Bin Ladin denied taking any part in it. He did not take credit for it.
His CIA doubles did take credit. Bin laden couldn't, as he was likely already dead.
The Zionists recruited Saudi dupes to play patsy for the attack.
Read this but play the intro theme of 'Americas Funniest Home Videos' in the background on loop.
I don't know what happened on 911; the only thing I am 100% sure of: the story we have been told is a lie.
Exactly ! what I don't understand is how there is no uprising...why people just are so apathetic about it?
Because they dont care why they are in deb can find jobs or just plain dosnt effect them s why give a shit.. Thats why hey are sheeple
When people fear the government there is tyranny. That is why...
That and they don't want to lose Starbucks and cheap gas and grocery stores. They want to go to nice dinners and compete with the Jones' next door.
Not start a revolutionary war that they might not make it through much less their children and families. I mean, that is what it's gonna take. People aren't mad enough to die just yet.
Either that or there really is no honour and integrity left in American society.
That's why only a real economic collapse will activate them.
Its real simple the day before cngress question where trillions had gone so they killed some folks and destroyed our countries so the american public would just forget about asking again. Still to this day what happened to that money. We all know who did the bombing it was strapped to the bottom of th planes. Period end of story Bush did it.
That was only one of the reasons.
good piece
I'm confident that DC could admit they did it, for the greater good of course, and the human cattle wouldn't even be bothered to look up from their Apple Watch.
agreed...obamorons would "passionately" blame it on Bush...Fox fans would blame it on Clinton...bush and clinton shakle hands and it is water under the bridge. Onwards to fighting ISIS.
What difference does it make anyway?
They would be strung up on the spot. In for a penny? Mr they are gonna play this to the bone.
I would like the thank all the good folks that had the integrity to stand up and call BS. Its been a tough road to walk. It may become a very dangerous path but this was understood before they spoke up. Yet they did. For that they have earned my respect.
We decided to pull it.
We got tired of waiting for Flight 93 and decided we had to pull it anyway.
Redacted information that will become free to the public in 30 years when all involved have died or are senile and unable to testify.
If only the Nazi's had thought of this legal loop hole...
may take longer -52 years after kennedy was offed, they still won't come clean because Bush Sr. is still alive -and now they are trying to get his psycopath son, Jeb into the whaite house.
It's damning enough that the government made a concerted effort to dispose of the evidence (i.e. shredding tapes, killing witnesses, shipping all the WTC steel to China). It's infuriating that so much evidence is public knowledge, and yet nobody talks about it (i.e. Building 7, the dancing Israelis and the attempted NYC bombings, the Pentagon "losing" $2.3T and calling an emergency audit the next day, in the empty wing. Killing the auditors sends a powerful message).
The only good thing about nukes is that physical evidence always lingers.
The iodine-131 in the WTC dust is long gone, but the 2.39x increase in thyroid cancer remains. http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/22602/cdc_22602_DS1.pdf
There is all the public-record discussion of melted steel and melted bedrock even after the site was hosed down for months. Jet fuel won't do that, and I doubt nanothermite would leave such a long-lasting melt. Neutron activation (from a neutron bomb) would work, because it turns the metal radioactive, thus its heat is continuously generated.
Tritium is where the neutrons in neutron bombs come from. High levels were found in the WTC dust. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/01/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked...
Plutonium should also be in the dust, but since the testing equipment was from the U.S. Geological Survey, it was not calibrated to detect plutonium or anything heavier. These artificial elements are not found in rocks. A convenient miss? Perhaps, but there should be another smoking gun, right in the middle of the periodic table: Technetium. It's one of the main fission products, it's half-life is 211,000 years, and since it's also an artificial element, it should never appear in building debris (except for tiny traces from past nuclear testing). If the WTC was nuked, Technetium would show up like dog's balls.
This isn't advanced science. A clever high school kid could figure it out. I'm sure other people thought of it before me. So I googled "World Trade Center" technetium, and came up with rubbish. Google must be suppressing this. In fact, I bet this very post will soon make page 1 or 2, and then Google will flush it down the memory hole.
Somebody out there must have kept a sample of 9/11 dust. That evidence will come out.
Well put. Another factor that lends one to think nukes is the damage to cars parked blocks away. Very curious. And no, jet fuel won't do that, at all.
This image
http://www.debunking911.com/angcut.jpg
Straight above the firefighters head. A perfect angle cut and melted steel below it should open anyones eyes. At the very least make them want to question more.
But yeah, certainly someone will reply to me and say its a fake, photoshopped, or something.
They use angle cuts like this in controlled demolition. The melt is interesting. Maybe they used thermite too? They do like to be thorough.
To Westcoastliberal below: Yes, the melted cars are more evidence of nukes. No way jet fuel would do that. Thermite would have to be dumped right on the cars. This would require a ridiculous, absurd amount of thermite in the WTC. Looks like some of the melted cars still have their tires, which is important evidence that I can't really explain at this point. Partially blocked X rays, mmmmaybe? I've heard people say it was an EM weapon but that would have fried electronics, and I haven't heard about that (except for emergency radios being jammed).
Edit: Perhaps the cars were smashed by debris (which made the steel look melted) and maybe the metal puddles were aluminum, which melts at a lower temperature. Still, some of the cars were as far away as the lower East Side, and there were drifts of paper that never caught fire. Still doesn't pass the smell test.
Stick to the known, undisputed, verifiable, peer-reviewed facts. Speculation is a tool of disinformation.
Yeah, history tends to work that way and the problem the Nazi's had is the rules are always determined by the winners.....
Funny how the "Saudis financed it" meme is leaking all over the place when it was the Jews and Israel who reaped the most benefits - both financially and politically - from 9/11.
TM, not just that they reaped benefits, but many Mossad agents were arrested and held for months before being deported. Urban Moving--false Mossad front--boxcutters, vans alerting dogs to explosives, etc. Dancing Israelis anyone? Plenty of evidence of Mossad involvement.
Sure, the Israelis were the main beneficiaries and the ultimate enablers. But,eh, you're saying they wouldn't let someone else pick up the tab for the operation. I mean.....Israelis paying for their own stuff?
True to form, Israel stole the W-54 pits from the nuclear reprocessing plant in Amarillo, TX.
“If we (the Circle of Twelve Illuminati satanists/pedophiles) get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. So it doesn’t matter what you do, America is a Golden Calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the World’s biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it’s god’s will and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again, again and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.”
-Benjamin Netanyahu
With friends like these, who needs enemies?
How about a source for that quote. Thanks in advance.
I saw it in a very interesting Veterans Today article about the evil deeds of the Rothschilds:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/08/the-hidden-history-of-the-incred...
Apparently, somebody recorded Netanyahu in a spy bar in Jerusalem. A "100% fully authenticated" but un-named source. So we must consider that the claim of 100% reliability comes from the less reliable Veterans Today. Not the greatest reference but I tend to believe them when they keep the woowoo to a minimum, as they did here.
fellas, who needs 9 eleven when the fed is robbing us blind and the gov is watching you on your communication devices? nine one one was small potatoes compared to what is happening right now.
any how great post gw keep up the good work
There was many benifits of 911 for the .gov
ever notice how long the Patriot Act is and how quickly they produced it?
Thats because it was written before 1995 and was planned to be installed after the OKC bombing. There were still too many constitutionalists around then, so they just passed an 'omnibus crime bill' and kept it on ice till the right time, which was right after 911.
Mask1, 9/11 was the Great Enabler. That's why it's not small potatoes.
Bob Graham ain't no friend of truth.