This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
With 45 Beheadings In 2015 – "US Ally" Saudi Arabia Set To Top 2014's Record Decapitation Level
Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,
One of last year’s most popular posts was titled: Record Beheadings and the Mass Arrest of Christians – Is it ISIS? No it’s Saudi Arabia. Here’s an excerpt:
In the past month, a group of radical Islamic extremists based in the Middle East beheaded at least 23 people and enforced a ban on Christianity by arresting a group of people for practicing the faith in a private home.
No, I’m not talking about ISIS. The real culprit is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, one of the America’s closest global allies.
I have highlighted the inhumanity of the Saudi regime frequently recently in order to demonstrate the incredible hypocrisy of U.S. foreign policy. While America’s phony politicians and useless mainstream media will often hype anti-Chrtistian bigotry and humanitarian issues when it suits the status quo message, the true driver of U.S. foreign policy can be summarized with two words: CORPORATE PROFITS.
It appears last year’s jump in beheadings was just the beginning for the Saudi monarchy, which follows a form of Sharia Islamic law in which one can be put to death for rape, murder, apostasy, armed robbery and drug trafficking. In case you aren’t familiar with the term “apostasy,” here’s the definition from Merriam-Webster.
In 2015 to-date, the Saudis have averaged a little over one beheading every 48 hours, putting the latest tally at 45. Last year, they were only able to hit 87, but are clearly trying to make up for lost time. The Telegraph reports that:
A man convicted of murder was beheaded in the Saudi capital on Monday, amid a steep rise in the number of executions in the ultra-conservative Gulf kingdom this year.
The beheading of Saad bin Abdullah al-Jadid, who had shot dead fellow Saudi Abdullah bin Faraj al-Gahtani, took to 45 the number of executions since January 1, according to an AFP count.
Saudi Arabia has carried out around 80 executions annually since 2011, with 87 recorded last year by AFP.
Rape, murder, apostasy, armed robbery and drug trafficking are all punishable by death under Saudi Arabia’s version of Sharia Islamic law.
Earlier this month, it was reported Raif Badawi, the Saudi blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes after being convicted of insulting Islam, could face death by beheading, according to his family.
The case attracted worldwide condemnation when he was publicly flogged in January. His family said they have been told he is to be tried for apostasy.
While we’re on the topic, just last week the Guardian reported that blogger and human rights activist, Mohammed al-Bajadi, has been sentenced to 10 years in jail. What could he have done, you ask, to justify such a sentence? Well, the Guardian reports that:
A founding member of one of the few independent human rights groups in Saudi Arabia has been sentenced to 10 years in prison, a regional rights group has said.
Mohammed al-Bajadi was sentenced last Thursday by the specialised criminal court in Riyadh, whose jurisdiction is related to terrorism, the Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) said in a statement on Wednesday.
Bajadi, in his 30s, faced various accusations including acquiring banned books, organising a protest by the families of prisoners and publishing material that “would prejudice public order”, the group said.
The comments came in response to worldwide outrage over the sentence of 1,000 lashes handed to another activist, Raif Badawi, for “insulting Islam”.
The foreign ministry said the country’s constitution “is based on sharia (Islamic law) that guarantees human rights”.
This is one of the American government’s closest global allies.
Naturally, some human rights are more equal than others.
»
- 21380 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Thank you Mike Krieger! (And you too, Tyler.)
INBRED FUCKS!!!!!!!!!
They should bedick the Saudis... physically turn them into the cowardly pussies that they are.
You do realise of course that if you are against Saudi beheadings you are an anti-semite...
Jesus Saves?
heads or tails?
Maybe we can help them out of the eighth century.
We could help them progress a thousand years by introducing them to the eighteenth century guillotine.
Those clumsy swordsmen executioners miss a lot.
There is not much else we can do to fix barbarian Saudi Arabia except turn it into a glass desert parking lot (which would also restore the oil industry).
Hey, I'm certain those who've had their heads chopped off were first found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury of their peers. The US is a country of the highest integrity and expects the same from its friends and allies.
“I'm certain those who've had their heads chopped off were first found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury of their peers”
..especially the witches and surplus ”adulterous” wives.
Arent Wahhabi Jews?
Im confused.
RIPS
I understand that shrunken heads are drawing top dollar in European collector markets.
The Saudis are barbaric and should aspire to the American Christian values of bombing and droning the fuck out countries that have the resources the US wants. Until they are napalming villages, spreading depleted uranium across nations, killing 500,000 children who were "worth it", they will forever be medieval Muslim fucks.
Anyone here think slicing through a neck with a sword is somehow more loathsome that dropping a bomb from an air conditioned plane, from 30000 ft.
No, I didn't think so.
Christians don't bomb or drone anyone, their psychopathic politicians do. People complain about Christians, who are usually pretty easy to live with, consider the alternative, these nutjobs.
The same applies to Saudi citizens and hence Muslims. It's their psychopathic leaders doing this.
Blows me away at the absolute intrinsic bias hard wired into our minds.
Islam/Judaism competing brand names for circumcisionist child mutilation cults
Christianity competing brand name for child rapists. All religion is tarred with same brush, we just turn a blind eye to the evils of our own religious upbringing.
Don't worry, Jesus still loves you and forgives you for your sins and apostosy and the words you speak against him.
(Now if you were in Saudi and sprouting this shit off about Mohammed...well, then you would be on your own mutherfucker).
Jesus// Mohammed/ Yahweh, all bullshit mate designed to control you. You like an authorative figure controlling your thoughts, your life,, your being. Don't worry mate, humans have natural tendency for slavery.
Oh f*ck off. You're talking like such courts really exist in the west. I cannot imagine a more hypocritical set of courts like those in the US and EU. The real connected criminals skate every time, just like in the Middle East. It's the same phony pariahs everywhere. At least the Saudis don't make a pretence of justice. As for the US, these days you have to go down with a gun in your hand for a traffic violation as there's no other chance of trying to get out alive.
Yesd we could explain to them and their friends in Israel that their God(s) did not make a mistake in the design and therefore it is unnecessary to chop off parts of their childrens genitalia
.
Not at BofA or Wells-Fargo, he doesn't.
Jesus saves, but your wife spends. You got no chance, Gringo.
"You do realise of course that if you are against Saudi beheadings you are an anti-semite"
CH1 has 3 fatal flaws:
1. He'll sieze on ANY opportunity, however flimsy, to point a finger at what many would consider atrocities, perpetrated by a culture OTHER than his pet favorite.
2. His 'pet favorite, in this case, [regime wise], are actually 'crypto jews' [Wahhabi's, under the onion skins, are much the same as Khazars in a behavioral sense, adopting only the aspects which allow them to sidestep things] ~ lol
3. WTF is the difference between 'BEHEADINGS' [which feast on the 'GRUESOME' emotion factor], or the hundreds of millions who suffer & die otherwise in a world of counterfeit money printers, endless war machines, & propaganda.
I'll invite any questioning of the <ABOVE> reasoning by persons whose ultimate destination can avoid idiot ad hominem attacks... Otherwise, I'll kindly ask you to STFU... Thank You in advance for your cooperation.
LOL... I compliment a guy and it's all about Jews.
Is Krieger Jewish?
But, I have to give the Nazis credit: They own the ZH comments.
They also own Ukraine, state and treasury and most of the DC thinktanks.
And they're disproportionately Jewish...
Zionism and National Socialism have much more in common than dumb fuck gatekeepers like you can or will appreciate, but one is proscribed while the other has hundreds of nukes and virtually controls us foreign policy.
Xxoo
It has nothing to do with Krieger dimwit...
- You commented on the article <approval>
- Which, 'de facto' means you're a bandwagoner for 'Fuck the Saudi's'
- Which you might be right about
- Notwithstanding ~ where are you when Israel is committing atrocities [which happens with as much if not more frequency]? I'll answer that... FUCKING ABSENT!!!
- Worse ~ you jump on the bandwagon to decry the comments which support that well known fact... Worse, you're salivating for the opportunity to put the 'REPORT OFFENSIVE COMMENTS' link to use...
- Which makes you a fucking HYPOCRITE
Just as much as I'd like to know where those people who always decry about the Israeli attrocities are when the rest of the world constantly does shit that's far far worse. Oh that's right, they aren't Jews, so who cares.
Lovely isn't it? Living in a country where we have the luxury to pick and choose which attrocity to be mad at.
CH1 makes it a point to be my personal 'red arrow' troll [even if my comment is nothing more than a silly joke about Kim Kardashian]
He finds it offensive that I'm critical of people who:
- counterfeit money
- warmonger for profit
- support apartheid
- steal Palestinian land
- are at the forefront of propaganda
- hijack the geopolitical process
- hijack the legal profession
I'm clearly the bad guy here & he thinks that voices like mine should be silenced for the greater good... We're all 'NAZI's' you see <above>
LOL... Yes! I spend all day, just waiting to give you red arrows!
Unlike you, I'm not obsessed with this. I toss out a few red arrows - I want the Nazis to have some opposition here, small though it may be - but while I recognize your name, I couldn't point to any particular post you ever made.
But rejoice! You're winning Nazi Boys! You are the undisputed alpha gorillas in the Tyler's playground!
Yeah Thirst the "Nazi" jibe is getting really tired. I mean what exactly does it mean ? Does it mean you are a socialist ? a German ? (that would be racist). A German who was a grown up in the 1930,s perhaps ? Anyway these days it seems with a fresh look at revisionist history sans victors propaganda, far more and greater attrocities were commited against the Germans than by them. Dresden , greatest mass murder in a single day in history, the mass gang rapes of just about any female including children in Germany at the end of the war by Soviet and American troops. the delierate murder of at least 1.2 million German POW,s by the war criminal Eisenhauer , need I go on ...
Say what you want about the tenants of National Socialism, at least it's an ethos~
Walter Sobchak
Come on Dude, let's go bowling
FYI - there's no such thing as Palistinian land. Other than that, carry on.
Who gives a fuck about the Jews?
They ain't sitting on all our oil.
Get a clue. If you're so "outraged" go blow up some shit or stand in front of a dozer.
I'll look for you starring in your own news story.
Choosing which atrocities to condemn and which to be OK with is a personal choice.
A person's choices say a lot about them
Personally, my thinking is that deliberately causing the death of another human being who wasn't trying to hurt/kill you and yours is a bad thing.
I may not agree with you, but it's not my place to tell anyone what to think or believe, but please folks, think about things as if the consequences of your decisions were to be applied to you. It's a good test, IMHO.
Logical. Did I say any atrocities were ok ? you (deliberately?) miss my point . I am saying if calling someone a Nazi is the worst thing you can call someone , how come it is,nt also really bad to call someone a Bolshevic or Soviet or Yankee GI, or British Tommy as those groups in costumes all did just as bad and more numerous evils as the German "Nazis". Is that logical enough for you MAN ?
I wasn't being critical - just running with the thought.
I'm an anarchist.
Atrocities are NOT OK, no matter who sets the wheels in motion.
Maybe you missed my point.
ZH commentariat reminds blissfully blinkered, compartmentalized, and rabidly anti-Muslim/Islamophobic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_capital_punishment_by_country
This does not include extrajudicial killings such as pumping crime suspects people full of lead, nor does it include war and indirect (such as the destruction of infrastructure or blockading or orchestration of famine or instigation of revolutions) deaths.
It took the west how many hundreds of years of modernity to stop executing gays and "witches"?
Totentanz I am rabidly against ALL circumcisionist child mutilation cults. Other than that people are free to believe in whatever Big Daddy In the Sky they want to so long as they dont force that belief on me or my children. Whats so hard about that ?
Saudis are Semitic, right? Seriously.
US ally (blank) aborts hundreds of thousands of unborn children every year and euthanizes sick people including children.
Where (blank) is any socialist Euro cunt tree.
We should encourage them to open a chapter/franchise in DC (Capitol and USSC) and NY (Wall St).
That's Hope & Change I can believe in. Heck, I might even take up dancing on NY/Jersey rooftops. /sarc
Yes, considering the solution for ISIS was giving them jobs, this would be appropo.
Miffed
Maybe Guinness should take a film crew out there.
Obama uses the Espionage Act of 1917 to enforce his (and only his) version of apostasy.
You mean some beheaders are more equal than others.....fify
I'd like to get Ned Stark's thoughts on this topic.
Saudi Arabia is responsible for at least 100,000 deaths in Syria with its support of ISIS. How many deaths did SA cause in Afghanistan? Pakistan?
It is a cruel, corrupt, criminal cabal that runs Saudi Arabia and a few beheadings a year is the least of its crimes.
It's just a good thing that Islam isn't a violent, retrograde religion.....Obozo said so and he wouldn't lie.
Debt to the infidels!
We 'haircutted' some folks
... at the neckline...
Maybe its time to outsource the CFTC and the SEC to these people.
I wouldn't mind capital punishment for people found guilty of rigging or distorting capital markets. Makes since me.
What is it about these oil rich states that makes capital punishment such a favored form of entertainment (e.g., Saudi Arabia and Texas)?
LETS ROLL!
Obama drones killed more children in 2014 then Saudi Arabia beheaded people.
What is the difference between a moderate Islamist and a moderate Nazi?
Nothing. The SNB funds them all!
One is the head of the unicorn, the other is the ass of the unicorn.
A moderate Sicarii?
I knew this old Sicilian lady who used to delight in telling everyone that her maiden name (Sicari) meant assassin.
Oh yeah, she had the crazy eyes too. You believed her family was in that business at some point.
She also made a lasagna that was incredible.
I am reading a book titled "Zealot" about Jesus. The Sicarii are mentioned in that book. They were one of many groups which rebelled against the Romans - and against the Priests, who ran the Temple under the watchful eyes of the Romans and who also collected taxes for the Romans. Apparently, a "sicari" was a dagger, and the Sicarii liked to assassinate people using daggers, because the Sicarii could sneak up in the crowd, make one quick slash, and sneak away again. A Sicarii actually sneaked up and killed the High Priest with a dagger, right in the Temple, and slipped away. Of course, the Romans eventually got fed up and went on a retributional butchering rampage, which was Standard Operating Procedure for dealing with rebellions.
Yeah but they've got oil and money so it's democratic
While I favor the swift application of justice for rape and murder, I find the rest repugnant.
I favor the swift application of justice for rape and murder
And you're willing to employ gangs of murderous thugs to do it for you?
Your downvoters must like the concept of a police state.
What cracks me up is that many of the same people here who call themselves libertarian are the first to defend capital punishment by the state. They call me a statist because I think some form of limited, elected self-governance is superior to a free-for-all model of civilization, while they simultaneously advocate for the organized rounding up and killing of people by the state. CH1 gets a plus 1 from me for being consistent in his position that any government is bad.
We've been subjected to a lifetime of "Gotta get TOUGH on crime, derp" style brainwashing. It's a tough one to break, and people are not going to want to believe that we don't have a justice system, we have a legal system.
When was the last time you heard anyone say in person "that is immoral", or "that is unlawful." Always, *puts on nasally voice*, "that's uhh-leeee-gulll!!!" Welp, there go the last vestiges of natural law.
There are many things that are unlawful yet legal.
There are many things that are immoral yet legal.
Taxation springs immediately to mind.
The last vestiges of natural law left the building long ago.
I want to move to a better planet!
Napoleon Bonaparte: "there are so many laws that no man is safe from hanging."
Now you,re back to being more logical ...man
Can you explain why you distrust the State to do anything at all, except determine who is guilty of a crime and to then kill said person?
because they're so good at it?
Because consistency is not the hallmark of Libertarianism?
Rape and murder are such heinous acts that if you are going to hold somebody responsible, you had best be sure that you are holding the actual person who committed those acts responsible. Swift justice is not congruent with this. I'd rather let guilty people go and then defend myself against them than have a state that applies swift justice. A swift trial, yes, but swift "justice" is something that will all too often be unjust.
And my downvoter is a cowardly little pussy who wants the state to keep him safe.
There is no penalty too harsh for a prosecutor who tries and convicts an innocent person, nor for the judge who allows the trial to go forward. It is more just that 10 guilty men go free, than for one innocent man to be convicted.
People get pissed off at judges, but, IMO, prosecutors are a much bigger problem. There is a lot of unjust shit that is never witnessed by the judges because of how prosecutors do things. Most people who are faced with risking 20 years in prison vs accepting 2 years of probation for a crime that they didn't commit are going to take the sure thing, i.e. the plea deal, and prosecutors are fond of putting people in that position. A lot of prosecutors don't give a shit about actual guilt or innocence, they just want that conviction. A lot of judges don't understand this, and figure that no innocent person would confess to a crime that he didn't commit without seeing the viciousness of the prosecutors behind closed doors.
Collateral damage is considered OK by the system. Judges aren't there to change they legal system, they are there to operate it.
As long as the masses of iPhone junky feministas don't have to fear getting raped, who cares if a few innocent men go to prison? Nobody cares that a few innocent men are driven out of their minds by our society and led to risk their freedom committing rape to begin with, after all. The system isn't there because we care about others; it's there to protect ourselves, to make us feel safer and superior, and to punish those who we deem (whether rightly or not, and to what degree their own fault vs. bad luck vs. driven to it by us) did something that we decided to outlaw.
Is there really any difference between a criminal and a wrongly convicted man? Both are just unlucky persons who we punish. They are unlucky in slightly different ways, is all (one got to enjoy raping someone before going to prison, they other was a law-abiding sheeple who suddenly had his perceptions of the world around him shattered by a misunderstanding that rendered him the collateral damage when previously he thought that he was on the "good" side of the law).
Judges are like anybody else. Some of them are crooked, and some of them would be appalled if they saw some of the shit that prosecutors pulled. In many cases, they would have the authority to stop some fucked up things from happening, but if it never comes across their bench, they cannot do much about it. We have an adversarial legal system, and if you don't raise the issue for the court, it is rare that the court will even consider it. This is where the legal system can fuck people hard. It is your responsibility to raise the issue, and if you do not, the judge can let you get fucked and he has still done his job.
"First thing we do is kill all the lawyers (that are prosecutors)."
Government > Judges > Lawyers
All playing games with other people's lives and getting paid handsomely for doing so.
The whole 'legal' system stinks.
Our legal system is built on the premise that a little collateral damage is OK. You may disagree with that premise, but that's the way it is and there would be no way to punish anyone at all if we didn't permit a little collateral damage because it's generally impossible to know for sure whether someone is guilty or not. Instead, we use a statistical and democratic method where some people vote on whether to punish others based on how their emotions were manipulated by the trial.
If you still want punishment but you don't accept this system, then I'm going to assume that you just want to be the judge, jury, and executioner yourself.
The US has the largest prison population in the world. I'm pretty sure that there's more than just a little collateral damage, and that's not OK. I'd rather have to defend myself against a monster than to throw an innocent person in prison.
There are various possible reasons for that. Maybe Americans commit more crimes. Maybe the government enforces more crimes. Maybe the punishments for crimes are worse/longer. Maybe the government restricts freedoms more and defines more things as crimes. Finally, there's the one you mentioned: maybe we are too loose in our convictions, too eager to make someone pay for a "crime"....
I'm not sure which or which combination is to blame. :-)
The last time Congressional Research Services was asked to count how many federal crimes there were, they told Congress to pound sand because they couldn't do it. The time before that, they got up to about 10,000, then figured out that all of the cross references between the USC and the CFR made counting any further too complex of a venture for them to complete. That's just federal crimes.
Chapter 30 of my state's laws is the criminal code, and that has 57 sections, each section listing off multiple crimes, and there are crimes peppered throughout the other 76 chapters in state law, and I'm in a young state with a small population. That doesn't even get into state regulations. Fortunately, cities aren't allowed to make any criminal laws with a punishment greater than that of a misdemeanor, else that would be horrendous too.
We have a lot of things that are considered criminal and we sure like to punish people for them without any thought given to the unintended consequences.
Reposting something I posted in a previous thread:
Laws exist to restrict freedom, for the sake of defending and solidifying power, and crime breaks laws and and expresses freedom. Those who support limiting crime are those who support restricting freedom (because it would happen to increase their own power or safety more than it would hurt them). Most of us (definitely most ZH members) are interested in restricting freedom. (Anyone who idealizes any social, political, moral, or economic system, or who believes any laws should exist, etc, falls into this group.) Most of us simply disagree on what restrictions should be in place, because the ones that are currently in place are not in our favor as much as the ones we dream for. Of course if our favored rules were in place, there'd simply be a different group in the shadows fighting against them while we were in the spotlight. We should be careful not to become too powerful and to know the value of having enemies, lest we destroy our enemies and ourselves in the process.
Rape or murder are not particularly "heinous" crimes, they are just actions that are slandered and thought of very negatively and intensely feared by they the majority of our society. Yet to some people, they are the best or only actions possible, even if they come with a life sentence because only the powers that be are "allowed" to rape and kill (by their own decree) (if not physically, then economically, mentally, or otherwise). In different places or times rape and killing were not considered so horrible or even considered as rewards earned by the victors. That they are "crimes" is merely a bias. That crime needs to be "punished" another bias.
I'll bet you would change your mind if you and your family were the ones about to be raped and murdered.
Your bias would become quite evident.
"While I favor the swift application of justice for rape and murder"
Just the physical kind, or the financial kind (fraud, usury) also?
And how much money was donated to the Clintons from the powerful in this country again? SSHHHH
And one of the wealthiest families from which country bailed out W's failed oil company?
"Tehran's success, Riyadh's failure" by spengler
http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MID-01-170315.html
the ussa finds beheading irrelevant...? yes. we can live with that!!!
Citizens riot after ANOTHER drunk Ukraine soldier has accident in a tank, kills young girl
Fuck Ukraine and fuck the EU!
Fuck Russia! And fuck Putin!
Heads must roll for this outrage.
I see what you did there.....'I like the cut of your jib' - Montgomery Burns
Downvoted? Obviously you've never seen the Simpsons.....it's a quote asshole.
And what fucking business is it of ours Mr. Krieger ?
When in Rome......
Another faux libertarian.
I really don't give a shit what people,IS or the Saudis ,do in their own countrys,hasn't
being a (fake)busybody caused enough grief already.
I don't give a shit either. I just find it disturbing that we are friendly with them. I have always felt that the Saudi's are crooked fucks and do not wish to associate with them.
You use the term 'we'.
What do you mean by the term.
The ZH commentary boards are where the real Libertarians are. The ones that are kissing the very ground an Autocrat like Putin walks on.
I guess there is a fine line between nationalists and libertarians on ZH.
Libertarians are not serious people. Their whole philosophy is based on non violence and property rights. But say, how could you have property rights without violence?
Property rights were created the first time a hunter-gatherer cleared a field to farm some sweet potatoes. It was a lot of work and pretty pointless if any other gatherer could just come and pick up the tubers while he slept. He made a deal with some friends to keep an eye on the field and discourage anyone from taking the crops. In exchange, they would get part of it.
Thus a parcel in a native forest became private property and the first soldiers came into being.
Once a few humans had stored labour, some lazy, violent fuck came along and stole it.
Some things never change!
Er Benji are you deliberately being thick ? Libertarian philosophy is not based on non violence , it is based on the non INITIATION of violence . So go ahead take ma sweet taties , I,ll fuck you up bad m,fuka
Soooo, banksters and front running traders over there wouldn't lose their heads because their robberies were'nt armed...?
I suppose they weren't armed.
If you don't count all the hired guns they have access to.
Their game wouldn't last long without them.
My step-mom brought up the most recent ISIS beheading at a family dinner for my wife's birthday. Step-mom is a big Fox News fan. I said to her, "So what?! Saudi Arabia has beheaded more people than ISIS and they are Amerika's closest ally in the region." She looked at me puzzled and then said, "Yeah, but ISIS killed Americans."
Pass me the wine step-mom...
She used to call you Richard, now she calls you Dick.
Glad you didn't inherit those genes.
Did you mention the 9/11 hijackers being SAUDIS?
Or would that have caused a stroke?
This ISIS video is brought courtesy of Gillete!
Henkels!
What's that up in the road? A head?
Nothing to lose your head over.
Can I get a heads up over here?
That's using your head.
He had a good head on his shoulders.
All your heads are ours.
Pick up that head.
Can I get some head? I'm ahead of myself.
That's no way to get ahead in life...
He'll never be the head of a major corporation...
If I had to choose between getting a beheading, a lethal injection and the electric chair I'd go for the chair everytime. The Q99X2 on electricity is really quite a sight.
Has anyone thought of PayPerview?
Big money in televised executions.
How long does the heart pump blood out of the neck?
Mommy, do the eyes in a severed head blink?
Bowling for infidels could be a new game show.
Carlin beat you by about 18 years lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDO6HV6xTmI
Entertainment at the local fema camp on the first Saturday of the month.
Try George Carlin's solutions... Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDO6HV6xTmI
During the French Revolution, some said, at the time, severed heads from those who met Madame la Guillotine showed signs of still being aware.
Here, then, is what I was able to note immediately after the decapitation: the eyelids and lips of the guillotined man worked in irregularly rhythmic contractions for about five or six seconds. This phenomenon has been remarked by all those finding themselves in the same conditions as myself for observing what happens after the severing of the neck ...
I waited for several seconds. The spasmodic movements ceased. [...] It was then that I called in a strong, sharp voice: "Languille!" I saw the eyelids slowly lift up, without any spasmodic contractions – I insist advisedly on this peculiarity – but with an even movement, quite distinct and normal, such as happens in everyday life, with people awakened or torn from their thoughts.
Next Languille's eyes very definitely fixed themselves on mine and the pupils focused themselves. I was not, then, dealing with the sort of vague dull look without any expression, that can be observed any day in dying people to whom one speaks: I was dealing with undeniably living eyes which were looking at me. After several seconds, the eyelids closed again [...].
It was at that point that I called out again and, once more, without any spasm, slowly, the eyelids lifted and undeniably living eyes fixed themselves on mine with perhaps even more penetration than the first time. Then there was a further closing of the eyelids, but now less complete. I attempted the effect of a third call; there was no further movement – and the eyes took on the glazed look which they have in the dead.
written by a Dr. Beaurieux
MOAR BEHEADINGS!!
Why don't they behead themselves.
because decoupling is hard to do...
Send them all of our bankers and financiers !!!!!
I am utterly shocked! CNN keeps telling me that Islam is peaceful,loving and tolerant!
Don't you think it's funny that this stuff only happens in "Islamic" countries that are US allies? Christians went unmolested - or at least not singled out for special molestation - by al-Assad, or Saddam, or Qaddafi...
Those fucks aren't Muslims for fuck's sake.
Try looking around a bit and thinking.
Might be a bit of a shock, but give it a try.
Do they also throw gays off of rooftops? Where's the outrage?
Washington DC's Zionists and Neoconservative Empire Builders will lie in bed with anyone who they think can further the growth of Washington's power. We have seen it time and time again. After World War II, large groups of Hitler's Nazis were collected and brought to the United States to help build a modern Military Industrial Complex, and to set the space projects 25 years into the future. Nazi design teams built all the rockets for the US space program up until the 1980's.
But that was not so bad, compared to Washington's growing support for Islamic Jihad around the world. The idea was to build this radical Islamic movement around the world and direct it to attack nations the US did not like. The first use was in Afghanistan when we built the Taliban from nothing into the fighting force that threw the USSR out of Afghanistan. Arguably a good idea, but these morphed into Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, became the government of Afghanistan. We went to Libya and supported ISIS and Al-Qaeda in their take over of Libya. We armed funded and trained the ISIS and Al-Qaeda that we supported to attack Syria. In Iraq, we turned the most dangerous place in the world for radical Islam, into a home base for every sort of terror.
Saudi Arabia is the Zionists right hand man. They provide the money and the secret services that are the core of US Islamic Jihad movement. Where the CIA dare not go, the Saudi intelligence does go, and does what is ordered by Neoconservative Washington DC. The US seeks to use radical Islamic Jihad all over the world, they aim to attack Russia and China with the Jihadiat armies they are building. Syria is still under attack by America's Jihadists. Saudi Arabia provided the service of 9/11 which allowed our entire nation to be turned into a police state. When we need terror, we turn to the Saudis!
One last thing. Why, with all the Islamic terror armies there now are in the world, ISIS, Al-Queda, Taliban and dozens of smaller Jihadist groupings, WHY do they always seem to attack leaders and nations the USA and Israel do not like? Islamic terror is almost exclusively a tool of western interests. Israel is never attacked, not by these so called threats . We hear 24/7 about the threat of radical Islam. yet they never touch Israel, and only touch the USA when a false flag is needed to justify more military and police actions on home soil.
Funny how this great Islamic threat seems to work hand in glove with Washington and Tel Aviv. We American people do not support Islam, yet our leaders do. We have a right to ask why.
Which Islam?
The most committed and reliable enemy of ISIS - the ones actually sending thousands of men to the front lines to fight it, mano-i-mano - is Hezbollah.
Radical Extremist Islam as practiced in Saudi Arabia. Taliban Islam as practiced in Afghanistan. Thought I made that clear, but might not have.
Sobering thoughts. Mark Twain once said : It is easy for people to make mistakes, it is hard to realize that you have. Thw United States, my home, has made major blunders. This isn't the only administration that has contributed to this, just the latest. So, what do we do as concerned citizens ? Write your elected congress official, then your name goes on some kind of list ? Lol, mine is probably there anyway. I wish i was smart enough to have the answers. It has to start though, and soon, or the bastards will kill us all in another global war. The earth has everything we need to live, it is our systems that are screwing it up. There has to be a better way.
Quantitative Cleaving
Hardcore religious people are so damn dumb. This goes for ALL faiths since it isn't like Christianity isn't without its black marks throughout history for stupidity. Witch hunts and witchcraft trials and executions anyone?
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
I know some Baptists that, if it were not for the government, would like to throw every non-baptist into a fire, especially the idolatrous Catholics.
Ignorant and superstitious as anybody can possibly be.
Yes, they are a most hate filled group. I often wonder what they preach in their churchs to breed such contempt and hate. These baptists are also major christian zionists. They worship Israel and at the same time hate jews. It's too fucking crazy!
I gots a fantastic album for you: Witchfinder General - Death Penalty
My two favorite tracks from the album, and an appropriate sonic addendum to your post:
Witchfinder General
Burning a Sinner
When Saddam Husein invaded Kuwait, we should have offered a deal: Keep going into Saudi Arabia and eradicate Wahhabism, and you can keep Kuwait. Reject our offer, and we not only evict you from Kuwait, we also destroy your regime.
We would have been far better off than now.
Why is it that all these guys look like Richard Pryor?
Wonder how much peoples the West killed by doing incessant war in Middle-East ?
Wonder how much peoples the West killed by colored revolution and regime change in foreign countries ?
Wonder how much peoples the West killed by supporting the coup in Ukraine ?
Wonder how much peoples in USA have been sentenced to death by electric chair or lethal injection ?
Wonder how much babies have been killed with 1 million abortions per year in USA only ?
And so on...
Now by judging that, it seems that there is nothing wrong with SA being our friend.
Please, before lecturing others, fix you own stuff (and ideally mind your own business).
Can you chart this? Does it mean spooz go higher?
Everthing means spooz goes higher, duh.
I'm just glad that Bill and Swillary were able to get 25 mil to do God's work" of "human rights" apparently one of those rights is not keeping your head.
these cave trolls will eventually get what is coming to them when their oil runs out. their irrevelevance to evolution will play itself out and their "kingdom" will wither back to the tents and huts they deserve. Maybe they can buld a sand castle or something.
The kingdom will likely end before the oil runs out. The jihadis will have a really fun time dealing with all that "royalty".
Exactly right.
Iran is going to destroy the House of Saud when Saudi Arabia grants overflight permission to the IDF after Israel finally decides to act unilaterally and begin bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. Saudi Arabian oil fields are going to be burning for years after such an act.
Ah religion, of the thousands that exist, each believer has chosen the true one.
That generally is harmless enough. It's when the believer wishes to impose his beliefs on others, problems arise. Those tend to be the power seeking psychopaths.
Miffed
We’ll beat this record once the dollar goes.
I’m getting everyone in my subdivision.