This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
BofA's Modest Proposal For Greece: "A Negative Shock May Be Necessary"
Via BofAML's Athanasios Vamvakidis,
Time for Tsipras to be Greece’s Lula?
Greece has less than two weeks to persuade the rest of Europe of its commitment to reforms. We previously argued that President Lula’s case in Brazil—a former union leader from the left, who was credited with impressive economic performance despite initial market concerns—suggests that Greece’s Prime Minister Tsipras could similarly surprise markets positively by implementing market-friendly, structural reforms. Official data suggest that the Greek government will run out of its cash buffers by the end of March—press reports in Greece suggest that the government has a funding gap of €1.5bn in March and €2bn in April. The Greek government has committed to submit details of its reform plans following recent meetings with European leaders, which the European institutions and the IMF will evaluate. Now may be the time for Prime Minister Tsipras to show to the rest of the world that he is Greece’s Lula.
We believe that a strong commitment to reforms will be what could cut Greece’s Gordian knot. We have argued in the past that Greece had to implement more austerity in recent years because of weak implementation of reforms. The Tsipras government has a unique opportunity now to stop the negative feedback loop between austerity and growth and build trust with the rest of Europe by accelerating and broadening reforms. We do not see a scenario in which Greece receives more official loans, for less austerity and without more reforms. In contrast, reform implementation could allow an agreement on new official loans, help address tail risks, and increase long-term potential growth, a win-win situation.
The reform list in the Eurogroup agreement of February 20 is a very good starting point in our view. Reading the list, it is almost impossible for us to disagree with any of these reforms. However, the Greek government has to prove ownership of these reforms and show determination to get the job done. Success will increase the government’s credibility and could lead to an agreement that will include a growth-friendly fiscal consolidation looking forward.
Needless to say, and consistent with recent commitments, the Greek government should avoid rolling back any of the past reforms or introduce measures that would worsen fiscal conditions or could threaten financial stability. New policies will have to wait to be part of an agreement for a new adjustment program and be consistent with the new fiscal targets and plans to bring the financial sector back to health.
Progress in negotiations with the rest of Europe and the IMF based on a reform agenda could help address funding pressures. We believe that the European institutions will not allow an “accident” in Greece because of funding pressures in the sovereign or the banks, as long as they are converging towards an agreement for a new arrangement with the Greek government. However, our view is that funding pressures in Greece will become much stronger in early April if this round of negotiations fails. Time is very short.
The end of the road
We believe that Europe and Greece may not be able to “kick the can down the road” beyond June. The European governments will need to approve a new program for Greece that will include new official loans (the exact amount will depend on the fiscal targets, but press reports in Greece suggest €30 to €50bn). The Greek government will have to approve a new package of measures and reforms, some of which could be unpopular and against pre-election promises.
Absent the latter, we don’t see how the former can take place. The Greek government needs to demonstrate a genuine reform effort to persuade the European parliaments to approve more loans. One could argue that saving Greece increases the chances of the European institutions and the IMF getting their money back. Moral hazard considerations also suggest that saving Greece if the country fails to deliver on its reform promises could cost more in the long term.
Either Greece will stop trying to save the failed past and look into the future, treating the crisis and the adjustment program as opportunities to finally implement urgently needed reforms, or the country will be eventually forced to exit the euro, in our view. The crisis took place because Greece had policies that were inconsistent with being in a monetary union. The crisis has been so severe because Greece has been trying to save these policies. Program flaws also contributed to the crisis, but other periphery countries had much better implementation record than Greece and have started recovering. The trigger of the worst moments of the Greek crisis has been domestic brinkmanship and political uncertainty. Economics 101 teaches us that an economy can survive within a monetary union only if it has fiscal policy room and structural flexibility to respond to asymmetric shocks. In our view, Greece had none and has none. We see no solution for Greece within the Eurozone without reforms.
Three possible scenarios
In what follows we consider three possible scenarios for Greece.
- The good scenario is the Lula scenario, in which Greece commits and implements key reforms, stays in the Eurozone, starts seeing positive growth surprises, and regains market access.
- The bad scenario is another effort to kick the can down the road, with Greece doing just enough to persuade the rest of Europe to keep the country in the Eurozone and the Europeans giving to Greece just enough loans to repay existing loans; we argue that this scenario is not sustainable.
- And the ugly scenario, in which there is no deal between Greece and the European institutions, leading to a bank run, capital controls, and eventually Euro exit.
It could also be the case that triggering the bad, or even the ugly scenario would force a political consensus in Greece to move to the good scenario, but the situation will likely have deteriorated in the meantime.
Our baseline remains that Greece will choose to reform and will therefore stay in the Euro, but brinkmanship so far suggests to us that risks of negative scenarios have increased. We are getting increasingly concerned that a negative shock may be necessary to force the Greek government to achieve a consensus for the reforms that the country needs. Our optimistic baseline scenario is based on the strong support for the Euro in the polls in Greece. However, we have been on the way towards a negative scenario so far and something will have to change in the negotiations to bring Greece back on track.
The good scenario
In this scenario, Greece starts implementing key reforms, consistent with the February 20 Eurogroup agreement. For the first time since the crisis started, the Greek government could own the reform program, which should lead to better implementation. Moreover, all mainstream opposition parties have already committed to support these reforms in the parliament, which means that for the first time since the crisis started Greece will be approving reforms in the parliament by an overwhelming majority. In return, Greece will receive immediately more official funding to deal with the heavy loan maturities in the next few months, the ECB will start accepting Greek assets below investment grade as collateral again, and the rest of Europe will provide a strong commitment to do what it takes to keep Greece in the euro. After August, Greece will participate in the ECB quantitative easing. And later this year or early next year, Greece and the Europeans will agree on an OSI (official sector involvement, in the form of loan maturity extension of official loans to Greece). In this scenario, we would expect Greece to re-gain market access by the end of 2015 or early 2016, to experience a fast recovery starting in 2016, also benefiting from the weak Euro and the low oil prices, and to increase its long-term growth potential.
The bad scenario
The bad scenario is a slow-death scenario, similar to what Greece has experienced in recent years, but with increasingly higher risks. Greece commits to just enough reforms to persuade the rest of Europe to extend just enough loans to avoid a default in the short term, but not enough to support a recovery and persuade the Europeans to agree on a sustained solution. The OSI remains a distant hope, Greece has no market access, and the Greek banks remain at the mercy of ECB liquidity support. The uncertainty persists, perhaps with a small break when the loan agreement takes place, the economy suffers, the two sides do not trust each other, and any new shock could trigger the ugly scenario that we describe below. Absent a strong commitment by the ECB to remain the lender of last resort for the Greek banks, we would be concerned that this scenario will prove to be unsustainable. The economy will not be able to survive prolonged uncertainty and persistent risks for a sovereign default and a bank run, in our view.
The ugly scenario
In this scenario, Greece fails to demonstrate a credible commitment to reforms in the next few weeks. In this case, the Europeans and the IMF suspend the current program, the ECB refuses to continue increasing the ELA (or just lets the Greek banks run out of eligible collateral), the loss of bank deposits accelerates triggering a full bank run, and Greece defaults to the IMF and the ECB. Unless any of these shocks force the Greek government to go back and seek a deal with the rest of Europe, Grexit within this year becomes inevitable in our view. Either Europe will offer it as an option, allowing Greece to remain in the EU, or it will become Greece’s only option to avoid a complete collapse of the economy and even a failed state.
And everything between
Greece may have to start in the bad or even the ugly scenario, before we see the good scenario. This is not ideal, as the economy will have suffered in the meantime. We also believe that Greece will need substantially more official funding in this case. Moreover, the probability of an accident (bank run and default) would be very high in this case.
The question of whether the Greek government coalition will reach a consensus to implement the reforms that Greece needs is still open. It is now becoming clear that the government cannot deliver on pre-election promises to stop austerity, restructure the Greek loans to the official sector, and roll-back some of the most unpopular reforms of the adjustment program. This could have political costs and could lead to a rejection of the new program by the Greek parliament. However, Syriza has also promised to keep Greece in the Euro and to implement structural reforms that previous governments failed to implement because of vested interests. Indeed, tax reform and safeguarding fair market competition by fighting corruption and eliminating monopolies and oligopolies are flagship reforms in Syriza's program and are prominent in the reform list in the Eurogroup decision. We believe that delivering on these reforms will allow the Greek government to keep some of its pre-election promises, which are those that matter the most. Some of the government parliamentarians may have different views and a government reshuffling, or even a new government coalition may become necessary to reach a deal. We could also see a referendum on a new loan arrangement following an agreement with the European institutions and the IMF, which we believe will have a positive outcome given the strong public support for the Euro.
Another problem is that the Greek government has been trying to replace the institutional framework of the adjustment program with something more informal. We do not believe this is possible. Legally, the ESM and the IMF cannot disburse money without a proper program, including targets, conditions and a monitoring mechanism. The Eurozone’s crisis resolution framework and its functioning are very specific and have been approved by European institutions and country parliaments. We expect the European institutions to insist that all sides should respect this process and framework.
* * *
So, that's it - a few days to solve all this... with no possibility of a snow-job (because the Germans won't accept it)...
- 10767 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


While Greece was blamed several times that does not take all the necessary reforms, which is an IMF tactic to blame the countries rather than its catastrophic recipes, Troika decided to "reward" its faithful [former] Greek government by "signaling" to the markets to buy Greek bonds
"Fuck you, Malaka!!"
Just think. If there were no government there would be no unemployment. Everyone would just work to eat and live.
Doing the same thing, and expecting different results.......
BofA's Modest Proposal For Greece: "A Negative Shock May Be Necessary"
To BofA, now thats call the kettle black
Lol trolling Kraft-Heinz deal
Processed food giants Kraft, Heinz to merge after deal involving Warren BuffettSpain Portugal, Cyprus and Italy will be getting the same letter later this year. This farce is such a joke!
BAC is probably one of the largest bond holders in front of the ECB and Fed. front running price discovery for the last 2 years.
I double triple "pinky lock" you that we're getting pissed off, and you might be in breach of bond covenants, that were breached 2 years ago.
The whole fucking derivatives market is about to explode!
" BAC is probably one of the largest bond holders in front of the ECB and Fed. front running price discovery for the last 2 years.
I double triple "pinky lock" you that we're getting pissed off, and you might be in breach of bond covenants, that were breached 2 years ago.
The whole fucking derivatives market is about to explode! "
Who has AIG(or equivalent ridiculously unhedged hedge seller)'s back this time, Mr. & Mrs. American Taxpayer?
"Obama is gonna pay my credit event!"
What's that quote about how the world will never be free until the last banker is strangled with entrails?
"...a few days to solve all this..."!! WTF are they talking about, this has been going on for 5 years. Default, Grexit and move on already.
WAKE THE FUCK UP!
You just got an example of Greece's commitment to correct the fucked up system it has when you see the ex financial minister get off with a misdemeanor.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-25/greek-finance-minister-praised-...
So all we have is NATO and Putin....and we dont even know if this is all a soap opera...All I know, is no matter who wins, the outcome is the same. Total control over people...Sure, we could go back to 1776 and start the fight all over again, but nothing is going to change...I dont care about those who do not believe in God or understand the bible anymore, but this has all been written and there is no fix and our only hope is in Jesus Christ....There I said it... I dont care about how many downvotes I get...
if the putin thing was real, he would have not been able to have meetings with people like the italian minister, because of poison and other style threats.
it is easy to pontificate when you are tbtf
Yeah I was just thinking that Buzz backstopped by the Fed
hmmm, what is Mozilo doing tonight...country wide streching out so far and wide, keep manhattan just give me the country side.
Question: How does a Company absorb so many other corps in two days.? Trust me when I say...Bofa is NOT too big to fail...
go ahead, wanna laugh? click on it...http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/video/v...
The powerless are always the ones most preyed upon.
The Greek people are being bled dry by the banksters.
I think this could be another 'template' if the buggers get away with it.
Fix the debt problem with more debt????!!!
If you told a heroin addict that more smack would fix things, he'd likely go for it.
Wouldn't fix his problem, but if you are his dealer it will help you, for sure.
The world has been finacialized and as soon as something is financialized it's fucked.
BRUSSELS GIVES GREECE 5 DAYS TO PRESENT STRUCTURAL REFORMS FOR THE NEXT 800 YEARS
Germany opposes the European demand, claiming that "a plan for 8 centuries lacks strategic vision".
Source: www.financialpaparazzi.com
Or maybe put the banks/bankers and politicians in previous administrations on trial for corruption. This would include GS and all associated bankers from Germany, France, Britain, et al. Seeking damages would require those banks/countries repay not only the prinicipal, but puntative damages as well as for mental stress.
Reforms, reforms and more 'must reform(s)'. I'm so sick and tired of this stupid buzzword. It is preached daily by the establishment as the cure-all to economic problems. Really? So let's look at countries that apparently have these so-called reforms in place. Are they really growing more strongly absent an independent central bank that can finance their Treasury? I doubt so. Also the author of this article (who by his name happens to be Greek) claims that,
The crisis took place because Greece had policies that were inconsistent with being in a monetary union. The crisis has been so severe because Greece has been trying to save these policies. Program flaws also contributed to the crisis, but other periphery countries had much better implementation record than Greece and have started recovering.
It's not that they reformed, wise-guy. It's that the size of the fiscal adjustments they undertook were orders of magnitude smaller than the one enforced on Greece. Reforms if anything are mostly smokescreens for asset-stripping a country and of bulldozing over any remaining labor rights. Enough with these fucking reforms already!
Yeah, Bank of America geniuses, I get it, more "reforms". That's exactly what's needed, more, more "reforms".
Massive unemployment never seen before in a developed nation not in war, a destroyed pension system, a completely gutted education and healthcare system, 7000 suicides and a humanitarian crisis the extend of which we've never seen in a developed nation at a time of peace but, but, but, you fuckers think the optimal solution is......more " reforms".
Greece's optimal solution is to default and leave the euro. It should have done that in 2010 instead and take you fuckers down with it instead of destroying itself but better late than never. So fuck off and die.
There is only one scenario - total collapse of civilization >>>> forever.
The only question is, what will be the trigger for the deluge of misery, starvation and death?
Money printing can only fight the terminal disease for so long....
THE PERFECT STORM (see p. 59 onwards)
The economy is a surplus energy equation, not a monetary one, and growth in output (and in the global population) since the Industrial Revolution has resulted from the harnessing of ever-greater quantities of energy. But the critical relationship between energy production and the energy cost of extraction is now deteriorating so rapidly that the economy as we have known it for more than two centuries is beginning to unravel. http://ftalphaville.ft.com/files/2013/01/Perfect-Storm-LR.pdf
OIL BECOMING TOO EXPENSIVE TO EXTRACT
It emerged this week that the drilling of wells in the North Sea has crashed by around 50% this year, compared to the year-ago period. The reason for this is simple: the cost of extracting oil in North Sea has quintupled over the last decade, discouraging companies from investing within the region. http://www.fool.co.uk/investing/2014/07/18/surging-north-sea-project-costs-are-putting-the-regions-future-at-risk-tullow-oil-plc-premier-oil-plc-xcite-energy-limited/
The marginal cost of the 50 largest oil and gas producers globally increased to US$92/bbl in 2011, an increase of 11% y-o-y and in-line with historical average CAGR growth. http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/02/983171/marginal-oil-production-costs-are-heading-towards-100barrel/
Sanford C. Bernstein, the Wall Street research company, calls the rapid increase in production costs “the dark side of the golden age of shale”. In a recent analysis, it estimates that non-Opec marginal cost of production rose last year to $104.5 a barrel, up more than 13 per cent from $92.3 a barrel in 2011. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/ec3bb622-c794-11e2-9c52-00144feab7de.html#axzz3T4sTXDB5
Steven Kopits from Douglas-Westwood said the productivity of new capital spending has fallen by a factor of five since 2000. “The vast majority of public oil and gas companies require oil prices of over $100 to achieve positive free cash flow under current capex and dividend programmes. Nearly half of the industry needs more than $120,” he said
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/11024845/Oil-and-gas-company-debt-soars-to-danger-levels-to-cover-shortfall-in-cash.html
no, not total collapse of civilization forever. the powers that be LIKE their homes and lifestyles.
The BAC soverign bond dept. Jr. pinhead must read Z/H.
So an entire population that has been living the life usually reserved for only the ruling elite is expected to undergo a 180 degree phase change and embrace the life of the serfs?
Time to have a serious talk with the Russians I think because these are all suicide measurements.
The author must not have read 'The Merchant of Venice'.
Reforms. Just a nice buzzword. All those sentences and not one to explain what reforms he refers to.
Does he mean the privitization reforms, which are meant to sell assets for a one-time write down of debt? Basically pawning the family silver. YEAH THAT'S THE TICKET! Do that or you will fail and then the (broke themselves) Europeans will kick you out and then armaggedon and then (the really dreaded term) you'll be a failed state!
Raise VAT? Yeah that's the ticket, that will start growth too.
What then? More internal devaluation? Yeah that worked well. Troika cut-pastes from playbook, Greece do this, ok, it doesn't work, more cut-paste do that...
Varoufakis has ideas for reforms they just don't care for them. The government has asked OECD to help them on it. Troika just wants 4.5% surplus and same ol same ol, repeat the same things that keep failing.
Fuck this guy.