Why Is Russia Building Massive Underground Bomb Shelters?

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Michael Snyder via The End of The American Dream blog,

Did you know that the Russians have a massive underground complex in the Ural mountains that has been estimated to be approximately 400 square miles in size?  In other words, it is roughly as big as the area inside the Washington D.C. beltway.  Back in the 1990s, the Clinton administration was deeply concerned about the construction of this enormous complex deep inside Yamantau mountain, but they could never seem to get any straight answers from the Russians.  The command center for this complex is rumored to be 3,000 feet directly straight down from the summit of this giant rock quartz mountain.  And of course U.S. military officials will admit that there are dozens of other similar sites throughout Russia, although most of them are thought to be quite a bit smaller.  But that is not all that the Russians have been up to.

For example, Russian television has reported that 5,000 new emergency nuclear bomb shelters were scheduled to have been completed in the city of Moscow alone by the end of 2012.  Most Americans don’t realize this, but the Russians have never stopped making preparations for nuclear war.  Meanwhile, the U.S. government has essentially done nothing to prepare our citizens for an attack.  The assumption seems to be that a nuclear attack will probably never happen, and that if it does it will probably mean the end of our civilization anyway.

Needless to say, the Russians are very secretive about their massive underground facility at Yamantau mountain, and no American has ever been inside.  The following is what Wikipedia has to say about it…

Large excavation projects have been observed by U.S. satellite imagery as recently as the late 1990s, during the time of Boris Yeltsin’s government after the fall of the Soviet Union. Two garrisons, Beloretsk-15 and Beloretsk-16, were built on top of the facility, and possibly a third, Alkino-2, as well, and became the closed town of Mezhgorye in 1995. They are said to house 30,000 workers each. Repeated U.S. questions have yielded several different responses from the Russian government regarding Mount Yamantaw. They have said it is a mining site, a repository for Russian treasures, a food storage area, and a bunker for leaders in case of nuclear war. Responding to questions regarding Yamantaw in 1996, Russia’s Defense Ministry stated: “The practice does not exist in the Defense Ministry of Russia of informing foreign mass media about facilities, whatever they are, that are under construction in the interests of strengthening the security of Russia.” Large rail lines serve the facility.

Back in 1996, the New York Times reported on the continuing construction of this site.  U.S. officials were quite puzzled that the Russians were continuing to build it even though the Cold War was supposedly over at that point…

In a secret project reminiscent of the chilliest days of the cold war, Russia is building a mammoth underground military complex in the Ural Mountains, Western officials and Russian witnesses say.


Hidden inside Yamantau mountain in the Beloretsk area of the southern Urals, the project involves the construction of a huge complex served by a railroad, a highway and thousands of workers.

Within the U.S. intelligence community, there was a tremendous amount of debate at that time regarding the purposes of this facility, but what everyone agreed on was that it was going to be absolutely massive…

A report in Sovetskaya Rossiya said the project involves construction of a railroad, a modern highway and towns for tens of thousands of workers and their families.


The complex is as big as the Washington area inside the Beltway,” said an American official familiar with intelligence reports.

A couple of years later, a top U.S. general said that he believed that the complex at Yamantau had “millions of square feet available for underground facilities”

In 1998, in a rare public comment, then-Commander of the U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) Gen. Eugene Habinger, called Yamantau “a very large complex — we estimate that it has millions of square feet available for underground facilities. We don’t have a clue as to what they’re doing there.”


It is believed to be large enough to house 60,000 persons, with a special air filtration system designed to withstand a nuclear, chemical or biological attack. Enough food and water is believed to be stored at the site to sustain the entire underground population for months on end.

A few years after that, in 2003, there was an article in the Washington Post by Bruce G. Blair in which Yamantau was mentioned as a potential key target for U.S. nuclear war planners…

Die-hard [U.S.] nuclear war planners actually have their eyes on targets in Russia and China, including missile silos and leadership bunkers. For these planners, the Cold War never ended. Their top two candidates [i.e., targets] in Russia are located inside the Yamantau and Kosvinsky mountains in the central and southern Urals.


Both were huge construction projects begun in the late 1970s, when U.S. nuclear firepower took special aim at the Communist Party’s leadership complex.


Fearing a decapitating strike, the Soviets sent tens of thousands of workers to these remote sites, where U.S. spy satellites spotted them still toiling away in the late 1990s.

But the Russians have not just been building giant underground facilities deep in the Urals.

They have also been constructing thousands of new underground bomb shelters in major cities such as Moscow.

The following is an excerpt from an RT article in 2010…

Nearly 5,000 new emergency bomb shelters will be built in Moscow by 2012 to save people in case of potential attacks.


Moscow authorities say the measure is urgent as the shelters currently available in the city can house no more that half of its population.


In the last 20 years, the area of air-raid defense has been developed little, and the existing shelters have become outdated. Moreover, they are located mostly in the city center, which makes densely populated Moscow outskirts especially vulnerable in the event of a nuclear attack.


In order to resolve the issue, the city has given architects a task to construct a typical model of an easy-to-build shelter that will be located all over the city 10 to 15 meters underneath apartment blocks, shopping centers, sport complexes and parks, as in case of attack people will need to reach the shelters within a minute.

Of course all of this construction cost the Russians a lot of money.

One estimate put the cost at “anywhere from half a billion to a billion dollars”

Though the bunkers are supposed to be designed to shelter the population in the event of a nuclear attack, government officials say it’s only a precaution and they do not expect such an attack or nuclear outbreak (e.g. Chernobyl) to occur. Neither RT or the Russian government provided estimates for the cost of the facilities. A Popular Mechanics article that reviewed a number of different types of bunkers and building practices had varying prices depending on the type of shelter. Since the proposed Russian bunkers would hold roughly 1000 people each (based on the population count and other details), one could estimate that the lowest price point for a bunker this size, with basic necessities like bathrooms and reserve food for a day or two, may run in the area of around $100,000 – $200,000. This would put a conservative price tag for 5000 shelters anywhere from half a billion to a billion dollars. A significant investment, indeed.

So what about us?

Has the U.S. government constructed any bunkers for the survival of the general population in the United States?

Of course not.  In the event of a nuclear war, I guess they just expect pretty much all of us to die.

The Russians also recently finished work on a brand new national defense center in Moscow that contains extensive underground facilities

Russia is launching a new national defense facility, which is meant to monitor threats to national security in peacetime, but would take control of the entire country in case of war.


The new top-security, fortified facility in Moscow includes several large war rooms, a brand new supercomputer in the heart of a state-of-the-art data processing center, underground facilities, secret transport routes for emergency evacuation and a helicopter pad, which was deployed for the first time on Nov. 24 on the Moscow River. The Defense Ministry won’t disclose the price tag for the site, but it is estimated at the equivalent of several billion dollars.

In addition, the Russians have also been developing a new anti-ballistic missile system that is designed to keep U.S. nuclear missiles from getting to their targets in the first place.

The U.S. doesn’t have anything like the S-500 that is currently being developed by the Russians.  At the latest, it is scheduled to be deployed in 2017, but there are rumors that it is already starting to be deployed today.  The following comes from military-today.com

The S-500 is not an upgrade of the S-400, but a new design. It uses a lot of new technology and is superior to the S-400. It was designed to intercept ballistic missiles. It is planned to have a range of 500-600 km and hit targets at altitudes as high as 40 km. Some sources claim that this system is capable of tracking 5-20 ballistic targets and intercepting up to 5-10 ballistic targets simultaneously. It can defeat ballistic missiles traveling at 5-7 kilometers per second. It has been reported that this air defense system can also target low orbital satellites. It is planned that the S-500 will shield Moscow and the regions around it. It will replace the current A-135 anti-ballistic missile system. The S-500 missiles will be used only against the most important targets, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles, AWACS and jamming aircraft.

Sadly, most Americans are not interested in this stuff at all.

These days, most Americans just assume that the Russians are “our friends” and that a war with Russia could never possibly happen.

What they don’t realize is that the Russian people see things very, very differently.  Today, 81 percent of Russians have a negative opinion of the United States.  Our interference in the conflict in Ukraine has made the Russian people very angry, and there are many over there that now believe that a shooting war with the United States is inevitable.

And this week things between the United States and Russia got even more tense.  Barack Obama has already announced that we will be sending “non-lethal” military aid to the Ukrainians, but now the U.S. House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a resolution that calls for Obama to send “lethal” military aid to the government in Kiev…

Yesterday, in a vote that largely slid under the radar, the House of Representatives passed a resolution urging Obama to send lethal aid to Ukraine, providing offensive, not just “defensive” weapons to the Ukraine army – the same insolvent, hyperinflating Ukraine which, with a Caa3/CC credit rating, last week started preparations to issue sovereign debt with a US guarantee, in essence making it a part of the United States (something the US previously did as a favor to Egypt before the Muslim Brotherhood puppet regime was swept from power by the local army).


The resolution passed with broad bipartisan support by a count of 348 to 48.


According to DW,  the measure urges Obama to provide Ukraine with “lethal defensive weapon systems” that would better enable Ukraine to defend its territory from “the unprovoked and continuing aggression of the Russian Federation.”


“Policy like this should not be partisan,” said House Democrat Eliot Engel, the lead sponsor of the resolution. “That is why we are rising today as Democrats and Republicans, really as Americans, to say enough is enough in Ukraine.”

If Obama does decide to send lethal military aid to the Ukrainians, the Russians are going to flip out.

Sadly, neither side seems very interested in peace at this point.

We just continue to take even more steps along the road toward World War III, and it is a war that the United States is completely and utterly unprepared for.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Hulk's picture

Because exposure of skin to 10 million degrees causes blistering ???

SoilMyselfRotten's picture

They know they're dealing with psychopaths?

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

Good luck surviving underground for a few hundred years, or maybe even a few thousand years.  What is the half life of plutonium again?  After the bombs go off, all the nuclear reactors, if they haven't been destroyed melt down, and all of the fuel in the cooling pools burn after the water dries up.  I've said it before here, I'll keep saying it, there won't be an island on the planet you will be able to hide on to survive after the biosphere is destroyed.   Or you can live like a rat in a hole.  I bet they all go insane and kill each other in their holes then too.

General Decline's picture

Isaiah 2:19

People will flee to caves in the rocks
and to holes in the ground
from the fearful presence of the Lord
and the splendor of his majesty,
when he rises to shake the earth.

General Decline's picture

The Luciferians think they have a plan but I think they're going to be very surprised when it doesn't work out for them. Don't think for a minute that the United States doesn't have similar complexes. .

Stuck on Zero's picture

Assume for a minute that the Russian government hides in their complex for a year or two after the nuclear exchange.  At this point rains will have washed a lot of fallout away so they can resettle the land.  Just about this time the crew in a missile silo in North Dakota fires their remaining MIRVs at the Russian complex.  Toast.

This is not a joke scenario.  It is a part of the nuclear deterrence scheme intended to make complexes such as this useless.  During the cold war it was even suggested that we could be exchanging nukes for 50 years.

Does that make you feel safer?

datura's picture

what remaining MIRVs? The USA would be totallly destroyed by that time. Russians would not wait for any second strike. Besides, Russians still have the Perimeter. Why do people keep forgetting that? It can be launched automatically. All missiles at once at the USA. Not even mentioning all those modern silent Russian nuclear submarine patroling around the USA coast. And as for who is crazy, Russians do not plan to use nukes, they are quite sane. But they know that it is in the USA military doctrine: it is the USA who reserves the right of the "pre-emptive nucler strike", not Russia. And with those unsane neocons in Washington, what are Russian supposed to do? Wait for the neocons to strike Russia and do nothing? It is better to be prepared, when dealing with American lunatic politicians. 

Anusocracy's picture

Everybody knows that that is spec housing for Morlocks.

Stuck on Zero's picture

The airport is adjacent to the old Rocky Mountain Arsenal where all the horrible weapons of war were manufactured and tested.

old naughty's picture

Georgia Guidestones is globally applied, no?

So we have DUMBS, they have...(and Britons have their undergounds for centuries...)


"Sadly, most Americans (eh, earthlings, heads buried in sand) are not interested in this stuff at all."


Que sera sera...

Stackers's picture

And what exactly is under Denver International Airport ....... ?????

gmrpeabody's picture

Dead Indians..., that's why they named it Dead Indian Airport (DIA).

wintermute's picture

One estimate put the cost at “anywhere from half a billion to a billion dollars”

For  a 400 sq mile complex it is far better value than a B-1 bomber and a shipment of weapons to the Yemeni rebels.

vie's picture

Was going to say, the difference is the Russians tell their people.  Given the Russians have already been through a fair share of cullings, I suspect TPTB only want the people in the US intelligent enough to figure it out to survive (if at all).  That seems to be the the eugenicists MO.

Cadavre's picture

Err Al Capone's secret vault?

What's under DC?

What's in the "War Games" mountain?

What's under every state a local complex in the US?

The real problem for the inbreds running this ponzi is numerical. There are a thousand of us for each one of them. We feed em. We make sure their poopy flushes out of sight. We make sure they got `lectricity to stick a vibrator up their while they but bang preschoolers. They would exist without us choosing to allow their existence. them exist. All sorts of things they fear Waking the slumbering giant. Atlas shrugging. Loosing the comp status at the K Street Kiddie Brothels.

BUT WHAT THEY REALLY FEAR IS NUMERICAL. And our ratio to theirs is what they fear most. THese chicken shits get a wiff of the commons unity and they'll snitch on everybody to save their ass.


If you think I'll sit around as the world goes by

You're thinkin' like a fool cause it's a case of do or die

Out there is a fortune waiting to be had

If you think I'll let you go mad

You got another thing coming 


It ain't the Ruskies they fear, fools. It's us!

Trogdor's picture

And what exactly is under Denver International Airport?

Almost 20 years of construction on "nuthin" ... that and the billion-dollar kevlar roof are just normal, every day airport stuff .... /sarc

weburke's picture

kelvar for polar shift. jet gas stored there in amounts beyond belief. 

smlbizman's picture

and of course this also...yep we are just innocent snow flakes..bad vlad, bad...


weburke's picture

in the early 90's, I heard the queen was moving all her storage to the colorado mountains. that city in colorado with the military base, heard it was considered the most militarily fortified place on earth. Yes the us has vast underground as well, there is the factor that we are on a planet adrift in the cosmos, so planet pole shift, ice age, meteorite issues, supervolcanoes, whatever else, we do want someone to be planning for all that, notice they have at least one seed storage location, in iceland or somewhere like that. I am sure they have been doing this for a very long time.

TimmyB's picture

The U.S. submarine based Trident II D5 missile has MIRV capabilities.

Latina Lover's picture

The Russians get that the USSA is controlled by a satanic bankster cabal comprised of ruthless psychopaths. Only the fear of their possible demise at the hands of the Russians (backed by the Chinese) prevents them from eventually destroying everyone but themselves.

claytonmoore50's picture

The Russians have had a plan to do the same from their subs under the polar icecap, I thought that was why we are trying to melt it...?

cnmcdee's picture

He said, "The Russian spies have discovered where the most  powerful nuclear missiles are in America.  It will start with the world calling for 'peace, peace.  Then there will be an internal revolution in America, started by the Communists.  The government will be busy with internal problems.  Then, from the oceans, Russia, Cuba, Nicaragua, Central America, Mexico, and two other countries (which I cannot remember) will attack!  The Russians will bombard the nuclear missile silos in America.  America will burn.


Dumitrru Dudumen

cnmcdee's picture

peace peace i suspect will be in  spring 2018  the strike 2022-2024 get ready.

Murf_DaSurf's picture





sand_puppy's picture

I just heard an interesting lecture by Richard Dolan (who mostly writes about UFOs) summarizing the work of Richard Sauder on underground and undersea bases.  Most of this is conjectural and the evidence is not conclusive.  But the case is made that it is plausible that there are multiple large underground bases in the USA, such as at the Denver Airport.  


dexter_morgan's picture

And who is going to use them? What and who are they built for?

frankly scarlet's picture

I've heard the U.S. Navy manages a few that are under water...no not mortgages, actual shelters or ?... straight out of Strangelove and the "shelter gap".

Chauncey Gardener's picture

If you have ever watched Dr. Strangelove, then you know we "can't have a mineshaft gap."

Fun Facts's picture

"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room." - President Merkin Muffley

Cap Matifou's picture

I have "seen" such an underground command post in a lucid dream years ago. Felt as a military base in Russia. In the center of the room multiple flat laying glass slabs made into horizontal aligned interactive digital maps to pore over and look at troop movements. But nobody cared the maps, as on the walls on flatscreens dozens of international news channels talked over each other about some ongoing crisis involving commercial airplanes, for there was nothing more that could be done for the poor people inside them. And God be mercyful to their souls. That was the point in had enough and the scenery changed. You got my 2c, take it or leave it.

kchrisc's picture

The interesting thing about End-Time prophesy is that even God has nothing but disdain for the Jews.

"The Chosen choose badly."

The banksters need to repay us.


The Church, allied as such with Zion, does not fare well either.

cornfritter's picture

Actually, some of the tents of Judah will be saved first, so as their brothers don't utterly destroy them.  But that is said to be those who don't bow the knee to (I assume) Mammon / Solar Cult / Baal / Whatever.  Having said that, what actually constitutes a "Jew" in modern times seems quite the enigma to many.  That is also addressed in the New Testament - namely those circumsized of the heart (faithful) those who would not engage in murder (war), false weights and measures (modern banking), bearing false witness (myriad forms of deception played out in modern times and media).  2/3 are marked for death :-(  

TheReplacement's picture

Murder and war are not necessarily the same thing. 

cornfritter's picture

I'll sure consider that.  Fight or flight.  If flight is cut off, then it comes to self defense, which seems morally defensible.

Trogdor's picture

Well, the proper translation of the commandment is "Thou shalt not murder" not "Thou shalt not kill" - murder being the killing of someone who is not a threat to you (just 'cuz), or killing for your benefit (because you don't like them, property, power, etc).  Killing someone who is trying to harm you or your family is 100% justified.

thecrud's picture
thecrud (not verified) cornfritter Mar 27, 2015 6:32 PM

Not when you volenteer to put yourself in harms way. It only works if harm finds you through no fault of your own.


Mister Delicious's picture
Mister Delicious (not verified) General Decline Mar 26, 2015 7:30 PM

It is precisely IDIOTS like you, who believe a bunch of the ethnocentric, xenophobic, megalomaniacal myths of long dead nutjobs, who are going to get the rest of us killed.


A supreme be-ing did not write the bible.


And self-fulfilling prophecies are the work of stupid, gullible people, not the gods.



Andre's picture

While I agree the Bible is primarily a cut& paste job from the Councils of Nicea, your fanatscism is no less (and no less dangerous) than any snake handler or mujahidin. Stalin killed 30 million (give or take) of his own people, Mao got 60 or so million of his own, and they did it in the name of "progress".

gmrpeabody's picture

That kind of talk ain't gonna make you any friends here on ZH...

Volkodav's picture

ZH has many not much gullible in real

Andre's picture

That''s OK. I'm used to it. ;)

Take care.

Volkodav's picture

you too busy calling names to find the strong connections...

it is hard, cos no mentor, teacher where most look

of course it tells the shepherds will be terrible,

will not call name or call out the real enemy...