This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Latest "Conspiracy Theory" In Iraq: Accusations Emerge That US Is Aiding ISIS
Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,
My belief is, we will, in fact be greeted as liberators.
– Dick Cheney on NBC’s Meet the Press, March 16, 2003
But that enmity for the United States circulates beyond the militias that once fought U.S. soldiers, surfacing also in parliamentary debates and Iraqi media reports and even at the highest ranks of the national armed forces that the United States is aiding.
“Everybody knows that the Americans are dropping supplies to Daesh,” said Brig. Gen. Abed al-Maliki, a senior Iraqi army commander based in the city of Samarra, about 80 miles north of Baghdad, using another term for the Islamic State.
What’s more, he said, during some of the fiercest fighting around Samarra last year, U.S. Special Operations forces dropped behind enemy lines to assist Islamic State militants.
“They came in with parachutes, and they were helping to bomb the city,” he said.
U.S. airstrikes against the Islamic State, he contended, are probably just a cover for efforts to support the group.
“It’s just a show,” he said, sitting in the city’s army command headquarters. “If the Americans want to finish something, they will finish it. If they wanted to liberate Iraq, they could.”
– From the Washington Post article, In Fight for Tikrit, U.S. Finds Enemies on Both Sides of the Battle Lines, March 27, 2015
How do you know your foreign policy is a complete and total destructive nightmare? When the country you supposedly “liberated” not only turns into a horrific war zone, but all sides fighting accuse you of helping the enemy. This seems to be precisely what is happening in Iraq at the moment.
Just last week, I was shocked to read in the Wall Street Journal that the U.S. military was preparing to coordinate action against ISIS in Tikrit, alongside Iranian backed militias. I highlighted this in the post, Can’t Make This Up – U.S. Providing Aid in Fight Against ISIS in Iraq Alongside Iranian Troops. Here’s the key excerpt:
The U.S. has started providing Iraq with aerial intelligence in the stalled battle to oust Islamic State from Tikrit, drawing the American military into closer coordination with Iranian-backed militias spearheading the offensive.
Military officials said they aren’t working directly with Iran. But the intelligence will be used to help some 20,000 Iranian-backed Shiite militia fighters who make up the bulk of the force that has been struggling for weeks to retake the strategic city.
Incredibly, only a few days later, we learn from the Washington Post that one of the most popular “conspiracy theories” circulating in Iraq at the moment is that the U.S. is directly supplying and aiding ISIS in Iraq. Significantly, these accusations aren’t just emerging from random corners of the internet, but from senior military figures within the Iraqi army. Can’t make this up indeed.
From the Washington Post:
BAGHDAD — As American forces open another front of battle in Iraq, they find themselves on the same side as an array of armed groups that not only consider the United States an enemy but also accuse it of actively supporting Islamic State militants.
Since the U.S.-led coalition planes launched their first airstrikes in the Islamic State-held city of Tikrit on Wednesday night, threats and accusations from Shiite militias who were leading the battle there have grown. Several of the Iranian-backed groups accused coalition aircraft of bombing a headquarters for pro-government fighters in the city on Friday, promising retribution.
The claim was the latest in a long string of accusations leveled at the United States since its first airstrikes against the Islamic State in August. Rumors of coalition planes dropping weapons supplies to Islamic State militants and attacking pro-government fighters are now widely held beliefs in a country where conspiracy theories are rife.
But that enmity for the United States circulates beyond the militias that once fought U.S. soldiers, surfacing also in parliamentary debates and Iraqi media reports and even at the highest ranks of the national armed forces that the United States is aiding.
“Everybody knows that the Americans are dropping supplies to Daesh,” said Brig. Gen. Abed al-Maliki, a senior Iraqi army commander based in the city of Samarra, about 80 miles north of Baghdad, using another term for the Islamic State.
What’s more, he said, during some of the fiercest fighting around Samarra last year, U.S. Special Operations forces dropped behind enemy lines to assist Islamic State militants.
“They came in with parachutes, and they were helping to bomb the city,” he said.
U.S. airstrikes against the Islamic State, he contended, are probably just a cover for efforts to support the group.
“It’s just a show,” he said, sitting in the city’s army command headquarters. “If the Americans want to finish something, they will finish it. If they wanted to liberate Iraq, they could.”
When such accusations appear in the Iraqi media, they are normally accompanied by an image from an Islamic State video from Kobane in Syria last year, showing the militants displaying a load of weapons accidently dropped from a U.S. plane — an incident the United States acknowledged.
Whoops, sorry, our mistake! At this point, who doesn’t have access to hundreds of millions of U.S. weaponry?
Visiting U.S. officials are left to fend off questions about whether they support the group. The topic was the first to be broached in questions when Gen. John Allen, special envoy for the coalition to counter the Islamic State, met with Iraqi journalists in January.
The theories are stoked by U.S. involvement in the wider region, where Sunni states such as Saudi Arabia are battling for influence against Shiite Iran. While the United States has backed the same side as Saudi Arabia in conflicts in Syria and Yemen, in Iraq it finds itself on the other side of the battle.
A wildly popular trailer for an Iraqi TV program launched last year that mocked the Islamic State played off that speculation. It showed Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi hatching out of an egg after a marriage between characters representing Israel and America.
If this is how Iraqis greet their liberators, I don’t want to be invited to the party they throw for enemies.
Seriously though, it doesn’t even matter if these accusations are true or not. What matter is that Iraq is a total disaster zone, and everyone suffering from the chaos knows full well the U.S. government is responsible. Over the past decade, the clowns running American foreign policy have gone from promising the world that the Iraqis would greet U.S. soldiers as liberators, to all sides accusing the USA of aiding the enemy; whether that enemy be the Iraqi army, Iranian backed militias, or ISIS.
This is not a recipe for success. Unless of course, success is determined by the ability to create as much chaos and death overseas as possible via a divide and conquer strategy in which all combatants attempt to slay each other using weapons purchased from American defense companies. In that case, the Iraq war can be defined as a resounding success.
* * *
For related articles, see:
Hillary Clinton Exposed Part 2 – Clinton Foundation Took Millions From Countries That Also Fund ISIS
More Foreign Policy Incompetence – U.S. Humanitarian Aid is Going Directly to ISIS
Leon Panetta, Head of Pentagon and C.I.A. Under Obama, Says Brace for 30 Year War with ISIS
»
- 42290 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
" Shocked, shocked to find gambling going on in this place "
I knew this wouldn't bode well when the people started throwing their shoes at the statues of Saddam as they were being torn down. We have (had) no clue.
"Latest" theory? I've been hearing that ISIS was a creation of the US from day zero.
Heh, yeah, now if only it were a "conspiracy" and/or a "theory".... that would really surprise everyone.
So we're supposed to believe the (multinational) MIC engages in the creation of boogeymen?
Divide and conquer? Creating a balance of power, by helping one side (with arms/financing) and then THE OTHER side (if things get out of balance)? Gang-Countergang, ala Frank Kitson?
Say it ain't so! Its more than my fragile mind can take.
Mission accomplished !! Mission continuously accomplished. Every day, mission more accomplish'der.
Dubya was talking straight.
Whats amusing to me is, the only thing stopping most people from thinking the Zionists + US were involved in the creation of ISIS, is that it was almost TOO CYNICAL to believe. But, now that more time has passed, it seems those gut instincts were DEAD ON.
B E N G A Z I......
You left out the H... for Hitlery.
Further confirming the theory of Zionist meddling to create division and conflict among the non-Zionists.
The point of this conflict is to pretty much kill as many people as possible.
Where there is smoke, there is fire.
""Latest" theory? I've been hearing that ISIS was a creation of the US from day zero."
Damn straight.
The Covert Origins of ISISPart of the suggested "cure" to ISIS:
"The U.S. government and its allies should should be aggressively condemned for their failed regime change policies and the individuals behind these decisions should be charged for war crimes. This would have to be done on an nation by nation level since the U.N. has done nothing but enable NATO aggression. While this may not immediately result in these criminals being arrested, it would send a message. This can be done. Malaysia has already proven this by convicting the Bush administration of war crimes in abstentia."
Like the testing of the weaponized ebola virus, ISIS just got a little out of hand is all
I thought it was ISIL?
Anything for a dollar these Americans.
Anything for a buck...
Maybe that's why flying Malaysian Air is not such a great idea.
its not the Us , its everything Sunni Muslim,same crap as 400 years ago.
Sunni Muslims had 21st century US weapons technology 400 years ago? Where's your documentation?
ISIS (tm) - A Hillary Clinton and John McCain production
Coming soon to a fear box near you!
Even if ISIS wasn't directly supported and created by the CIA it sure as hell was by omission, exactly the same thing but in reverse...and with all plausible deniability intact
Yes 0b1, all they have to do now is add some missile porn and a nuc-u-lar alert or two and we'll be good to go.
it's all a shit show.
“If the Americans want to finish something, they will finish it. If they wanted to liberate Iraq, they could.”
Of course. But, the irony here is that the constant "wars & uprisings" that occur only discredit the US military, because its a direct public display of being unable to finish the job.
Kind of obvious there is no real enemy.
If you just hang your yellow ribbon and "support the troops", everything will OK.
/s
It lools like the real enemy is Peace, and Sanity. (Doesn't transfer enough Federal Funds to General Dynamics and Martin-Marietta).
That whole scene was a lie. A fake photo op.
There were no shoes thrown. (Except at George Bush).
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2842.htm
A William Banzi, Team America world police inspired graphic mass up.
Lots of mental health discussions lately on the MSM. How people react to the next ISIS news cycle will be interesting. And then how the MSM reacts to that cycle will be even more interesting.
Well, just look at who gets the most headlines. ISIS gets plenty.
They are an overnight sensation. Rockstar status.
Cheney and his masters will play the terrorist card for as long as they keep fooling over 50% of our naive poplulace.
Hopefully someday I will get my wish. These top assholes will choke on their own bullshit. In the meantime it is prudent to ignore these buttfuckers and the ugly ass horse they rode in on.
Same as in the tech sector, like Facebook. Once MySpace took off and .gov saw that ppl were willing to disclose personal info on the internet, Facebook all of the sudden becomes THE website to post your own mug shot, provide geographic location updates, and write your own epitaph. Of course, how and why FB all of the sudden got the massive media attention it did just after it started is (seemingly) a mystery.
Things not to do on the Internet, as per every "expert" circa 1999:
Do not post your personal info (Facebook)
Do not transact, incl. most obvious of all, no credit card info (Paypal)
Do not expect to be able to watch/share videos (Youtube)
Do not use search engines. Use portals (Google)
Am I missing anything?
How to defeat ISIS ?? -Stop paying them-. They're our team in the anti-Assad pile on; which is beyond Sick; welcome to the Fourth Reich.
I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do... www.globe-report.com
If we're helping ISIS it will be done with mercenary forces not American troops. This is what deniability is about.....
That was the Obama shift from Bush. No more large scale troop deployments, no more "invasions" or "liberations". No more big show. Just mercenaries, drones and air power. Keeps the home base quiet so Code Pink can just go to hearings and yell at McCain.
Agreed. The real enemies have always been within our midst. That would be the Neocon Zionists that still control and defend US foreign policy via their puppets within the GOP/Democratic party, the Pentagon, MIC, Wall St and various intelligence agencies. BTW, whatever happened to ekm1 and his bankster lobby going down in flames theory?
I guess I need to provide names for the trolls who are downvoting?
Perle, Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc...Gen. Wesley Clarke explains,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw
The translation of ISIS into English is SAS. Into American CIA. Into Canadian our only hope of being relected.
If I was the Iranians and I read this I'd be very concerned about signing any nuclear deal with the US. We might not hold up OUR end of the bargain.
Uncle Scam has a perfect record on doublecrossing on treaties.
Can't blame the USA alone, the history of treaties is so bad that the only reason to sign one is PR and political advantage. Iran is playing the game and they won't obey a treaty either but it'll look good on Obozo's and Kerry's resumes....
Iran is letting Russia be their representative. They better watch out for being set up and the knife in the back as others have gotten.
Iran needs to exhaust all efforts to replace Russia with China. Get China to sell arms and missiles to them and use China for the reactors instead of Russia.
It'll go something like this:
Iran: "We did it! They signed the agreement and we will be allowed nuclear power! The nuclear fuel will arrive soon, and we will begin construction"
US: "We have received confirmation that Iran is FOR REAL developing nuclear weapons this time. Look, we found their fuel stock! WAR!!!!"
yup, just ask the North American Indian....
Worried about the U.S. gov not keeping their word?
Ask a Native American...
The gov funds both sides bitchez, you got it here first
"The bankers and financiers funds both sides bitchez" fixed. If you actually had a government, there would be accountability... ...you don't, it's a fucking club, and it's getting smaller.
If we had anarchy there would be accountability. Individuals could chose not to support this crap.
Liberation for Iraq is in the mind of the beholder. I just can't see where the Sunni factions, whether ISIS or not, will ever subjugate themselves to Iranian controlled Shiites. At this point, to use a phrase, what does it matter? Iran essentially has all the Iraqi oil production around Basra along with the shipping ports. If one visited Basra today would one feel it is actually an Iranian city? The Kurds are also on their own and have a de facto independent state. As long as ISIS leaves them generally alone, why would they join some Shiite government in Baghdad? The Sunnis fought the Americans as they had nothing left to lose, being tossed out of governmental power and oil producing sectors. The Americans don't know what they are doing except sowing the seeds of chaos. They are supporting both sides and I'm not certain it's out of deviousness or utter incompetence.
Saddam Hussein was a friggin genius for holding that place together.
"Saddam Hussein was a friggin genius for holding that place together."
Green arrow for that one. What a great idea it was booting him out, don't you think?
We just decided it was time to destabilize the whole ME and there couldn't have been a better place to start than Iraq. When it descended into chaos everything else has gone down with it.
What was Iraqs GDP/capita when US pulled the plug? I think the US decided it was better to let the place go to hell if it reduced domestic oil consumption. So go in and bomb infrastructure back to the stone age (except oil ministry and well/pipelines), blow up a few Mosques (Shiite on Odd days, Sunni on Evens). Then sit back, watch the fun, and say you did your best.
You know the US Government executed perfectly when people complain how the US "liberation" failed, meaning they actually believe the same Government that doesn't give a rat's ass about them suddenly decided to spend Billions of dollars to help some poor people on the other side of the world. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!
The same counts for Assad. He contolled the various groups and has built a working Syria....and then US arrived.
How else do you explain that a virulently islamic group, sworn to kill all 'kuffars' is busy killing fellow muslims whilst leaving Israel in peace?
They are just so extreme, don't you see? Fellow Muslims, but belonging to a different sect, piss them off to no end. But rich, powerful neighbors of a different religion entirely, trying to take over the region, doesn't bother them in the slightest!
Wonder where the training and financing comes from, hmm?
Saudi Arabia, Israel, and friends (USA, UAE, Jordan, etc).
Just another symptom of how ABOSLUTELY FUCKED WE ARE.
I'm not sure why anyone would be shocked by this. This is just SOP for the US.
"This is not a recipe for success. Unless of course, success is determined by the ability to create as much chaos and death overseas as possible via a divide and conquer strategy in which all combatants attempt to slay each other using weapons purchased from American defense companies."
It is. I thought that much would be self-evident by now.
It's difficult to view the Obama Regime's actions throughout the Arab World as anything but what you describe, though I would also add a dose of incompetence.
The worlds fireman is an arsonist, go figure.
I think the current scenarios were worked out and simulated a long time before Obama came in. NSA/CIA etc. employ a lot of people, and some them are smart and zealous.
No doubt lots of "scenarios" have been run for many years. In the "old days", an anti-American dictator would be replaced with a pro-American dictator. When did it change to just festering chaos? They don't even seem to want pro-American leaders anymore, just create myriad factions. Frankly, I don't quite get it.
Added Bonus is they use a lot less Oil doemstically when they wage war versus an emerging industrial economy growing at +5% real GDP.
Unless that is the real intent of the US, to ensure as much oil as possible stays stored under the sand...
Exactly, sometimes the real goals, as opposed to 'stated goals' are discovered by the results and who benefits.
The Sea of Galilee: Hate Chemistry
You are going to run into hate. Whether feudalism or immobility is the cause or outcome is irrelevant. The critters haven’t been turning the planet into a desert for thousands of years by accident. Let the haters hate each other, while you get on with life. The critters had crappy equipment before WWII, and they have crappy equipment now. That’s feudalism.
The Fed has eliminated downside RE elasticity, and Congress has eliminated upside income elasticity, economic mobility, relative to each other, as instructed. After several generations of breeding stupidity, there is no sense in expecting anything else. Replacing engineers with H1B1s, who could just as easily be replaced with computers, and replacing everyone else with low skill immigrants, trying to escape the same, isn’t a change of course, from natural resource destruction, with debt, to create artificial scarcity.
In chemistry, the stumbling block is always titration, where the rubber of theory hits the road of reality. They didn’t test all those bombs because they understood chemistry, and they don’t have a stockpile of radioactive waste because they understand physics. University has always confirmed feudalism, with poverty created for the purpose.
When you run the first titration, run it quick, to get you in the ballpark. Then run it quick and pull up before your last titration reading, and add drops. On the third run, decrease the volume of drops to titration. Forget time. You want to get a feel for how different solutions react. The mistake most students make is trying to become experts in specific titrations, losing sight of the forest for the trees, instead of understanding titration.
The moneychangers have been at this for thousands of years, and what do they have to show for all the make-work? Even now they waste their time arguing about whether money, debt, in any form, is a store of value or not. There simply isn’t anything in the empire worth buying, for debt. Drugs and welfare do not an economy make. Who gets up in the morning to chase debt, expecting a better outcome?
Put first things first and last things last, and everything in the middle will take care of itself. Funny, insecure HR personnel will leave you messages stating that you must respond by a certain time if you want a make-work job, crack me up. If the whole point of HR is to convince you that you are a commodity and it is financial capital that is rare, in a world obviously awash in financial capital, increasingly trying to fit in the eye of a needle, what do you suppose that means?
Talking heads don’t work, and spend all their time trying to prove that they do, with numbers, words and technology created for the purpose. Government is nothing more than inertia, loading a spring, of whatever tensile strength you care to design, but go ahead and prove otherwise. Its problem is drugs, for which its answer is always drugs, a problemsolution.
Long before entering public education, I learned to build my own equipment, and leave behind whatever I no longer needed, for my family to steal. If you haven’t noticed, the planet isn’t negotiating. It doesn’t care whether you hate yourself or others. Likewise, labor builds, carries and drops gravity, as a counterweight. Because you do not see an economy on TV, an i-phone, or a watch doesn’t mean that it isn’t there.
Preaching to the choir. My tribe is prepared nd doing well but we went long black markets and sharecropping a long time ago...
Bot generated response?
Because their parents stole from your parents, and they are trying to force you to carry them across the goal line is no reason to get emotional. Feudalism exists for a reason. It’s just gravity, which has its uses.
Well we defeated Al Queda in the last Kabuki war, so what did you expect but more theatre?
I don't want to jump to conclusions, but if Obama is actually helping ISIS to target Shia and Iranian militias, I would like to personally hand him his second Nobel Peace Prize.
And that's because you are a Kike. Ain't it Kike?
<img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8567/16472753498_b5c14ca934_b.jpg" width="1024" height="640" alt="JIHAD JOHNNY">
The US IS ISIS
This isnt new. Benghazi ring a bell? They were giving ISIS start up weapons.
I've seen other stories about the US air dropping ISIS supplies going back to last Fall.
"How do you know your foreign policy is a complete and total destructive nightmare? When the country you supposedly “liberated” not only turns into a horrific war zone, but all sides fighting accuse you of helping the enemy. This seems to be precisely what is happening in Iraq at the moment."
What if this was the goal and not a mistake? Of course they wouldn't say so in public. They never offer their real intentions.
However, the west has been destablizing that region since the end of WWI.
Next you will suggest the British Emprie was controlled by keeping foes fighting each other.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP_Ezjm7xDg
US needs more mula and selling war things to be broken almost instantly is the second best business on the planet!!!
Much could be said about ISIS, and has, but the summary of it all is, ISIS emanates from Zion.
The banksters need to repay us.
A boogeyman re-brand.
"We have no idea who we're helping. All these Muslims look alike to us especially when we've been drinking, doing blow, and hanging with prostitutes for hours on end"
Signed,
CIA, FBI, Secret Service, NSA, US Senate, US House, ...
Judas Priest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieByCvPuQns
Here's Nafeez Ahmed's latest article on how the West created al Qaeda and is funding ISIS while bombing it.
There's a fun part about how NATO's Canadians are acting as al Qaeda's air force in Libya.
Krieger needs to update his sources to include Ahmed, who has been tearing the lid off the CIA, NSA, the Pentagon and MI-5:
http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/white-supremacists-heart-whitehall-...
https://medium.com/@NafeezAhmed/death-drugs-and-hsbc-355ed9ef5316
http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/The-circus-How-British-in-by-Nafeez-A...
https://medium.com/@NafeezAhmed/preventing-dissent-27efd26191a9
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/pentagon-makes-no-secret-wanti...
https://medium.com/@NafeezAhmed/why-google-made-the-nsa-2a80584c9c1
https://medium.com/@NafeezAhmed/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e
I read reports last week that we've been providing ammunition drops to ISIS!!!
In which country - Iraq, Syria, Libya, or Yemen?
(this is a trick question)
Too difficult for the Glilot Junction and Langley to supply it themselves.
The banksters need to repay us.
there is no need for all these gyrations of the mind trying to parse the "facts" from both sides.
isis is the backdoor to iran. the only country that wants iran out of the way is israel. they haven't been shy about it.
It's not just a war. It's a profit center!
Be still my heart we've all been lied to. If we've been lied to does that mean the coalition of the willing have also been lied to. Looks like it unless all the bastards are lieing to the rest of us. The USA are becoming good at this.
Anyways, Prime Minister (PUPPET) HARPER has obviously conned the Canadians. If he knows about this entire scenario he should be given the boot on the darkerst part of his posterio. Election time is this fall for this character and all of this lieing may be his undoing.
Let's hope.
Great Grandpa owned a ranch.
All of it was claimed before the area was even a US terrirtory. But when the area became a state they declared everything to belong to the Federal Government. The only way you could keep your ranch land was to prove that you had livestock on it at all times. But that's not grazing land works. The livestock don't graze in one spot all year or they'd eat everything and starve. Instead you graze them on one spot for a while, then move to the next pasture and let the first pasture recover.
But the BLM wouldn't allow it. They wanted livestock on every pasture all the time. They sent inspectors out to count your livestock, and determine if you could keep your pastures on that basis.
Most of the ranchers lost almost all their land to the BLM as a result. But not Great Grandad. Everytime he was inspected he had the required stock in every pasture.
No one knew how he did it. There was no way to move the stock from one pasture to the next as fast as the inspector could go. What was his secret?
Wild Horses.
He left the pasture gates open, and put barley feeders in the pastures a day or two before inspection. The wild horses would come in all on their own. So before the inspector arrived, all he would need to do is close the gate.
Seems to me that ISIS are wild horses.
To retain its position, the US has to keep addressing European security concerns. And there is no bigger security concern than energy security. The US also has to give something to the Gulf Nations to make them inclined to go along with the things the US wants. Put the two together, and the problem with places like Syria and Libya is that their leaders wouldn't let there be pipelines from Gulf-owned energy fields to Europe.
So what do they do?
They open the gate to Syria, and put something that the wild horses really like there. In the meantime some of those wild horses have strayed into the wrong pasture - Iraq. Now they want to close the gate.
The destruction of Assyrian and Mesopotamian antiquities. You can bet Israel and their overseas dual citizens don't mind that occouring...I bet they're celebrating.
Tabula Rasa: clean slate on which to write the chosenite 'victor's history'. Destroy all existing cultures, races, religions by turning them against eachother. Divide and conquer, again. Still.
Barbara Spectre on forced immigration to dilute established European populations:
http://www.whyileftsweden.com/?p=198
Well felluhs, I came from Jeddah to Istanbul and have travelled from Antakya to Urfa, Diyarbakir and am now in Mardin. I can safely tell you that everyone in these parts knows that the US is supporting Daesh. I've met Syrian refugees of various stripes, combatant kurds and others, it's simply taken for self evident that ISIS is a creature of what my homies at www.thesaker.is call the 'Anglo-Zionist Empire.' It's clear enough to anyone with any sense anyway. The main thing is to oust Assad, get rid of a Russo-Iranian ally, pipe oil from the gulf via Syria to Europe further undemining the Russo-Iranian combine, stop Iraq's natural slide into the embrace of Iran, create chaos that will require the establishment of more american bases to the resque, and make the US and its vassal EU economies look good when compared to the chaos everywhere else. Some think that Turkey supports the secular free-syrian army, others realize that the AK regime of padishah Erdogan isn't exactly pro-secular and is another US bitch-vassal, so supports Daesh like a good little boy and are fanatical about removing Assad.
cheney=torture
I upvoted you stozi for thesaker mention. Lots of great analysis there.
Wtf is all this talk of saddam hussein's rule being so awesome 'til the us toppled him'?
Fuckin BS. Do you people think? He was a rich ass king living in a palace...people (serfs lived like shit. Yes they still do. But im so fuckin tired of hearing how the world would be all unicorns and rainbows if the US didnt 'interfere'.
Oh yeah..life in iraq would be great..for the handful of folks gettin the oil money.
And its the same for all those 'poor countries'. The ruling class does just fine..the rest..not so much.
Jesus..
Ok..so i dont have an answer..but really now.. most of these countries are f'd before we get there. Be fuckin honest at least. THEN we can address the 'issues' and stop all the fuckin finger pointing.
Its no different than all the zhers that hate it when the 'market ' goes up.
Haters gonna hate i guess.
StupidEarthlings... If U.S. had left Saddam Hussein alone, would it be a bombed-out sh!thole that it is today?
"Conspiracy theory"? It's NOT a conspiracy theory, it's a fact that has been known to people who bother to do this thing called "thinking" for a while now. These idiots writing this "articles" should try it for a change.
ISIS: they cannot be spotted by satellite. They cannot be infiltrated by covert ops. Silver bullets, Holy Water and Crucifixes are powerless to stop them. Not even whole garlic cloves can stay the desert-dwelling men in black ski-masks and gloves away from their mission of attacking and destabilizing Israel’s neighbors (coincidentally, of course).
http://winteractionables.com/?p=19623
America already Liberated Iraq Bush said so. Now you lost it already and want us to do it again.
Were not we will aid but you have to do the fighting this time and you are failing at that and having Iran do it for you sorry but you might as well raise the Iranian flag you dont deserve to be a country.