HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM

George Washington's picture

Agent In Charge of Amerithrax Investigation Blows the Whistle

The FBI head agent in charge of the anthrax investigation - Richard Lambert - has just filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit calling the entire FBI investigation bullsh!t:

In the fall of 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, a series of anthrax mailings occurred which killed five Americans and sickened 17 others. Four anthrax-laden envelopes were recovered which were addressed to two news media outlets in New York City (the New York Post and Tom Brokaw at NBC) and two senators in Washington D.C. (Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle). The anthrax letters addressed to New York were mailed on September 18, 2001, just seven days after the 9/11 attacks. The letters addressed to the senators were mailed 21 days later on October 9, 2001. A fifth mailing of anthrax is believed to have been directed to American Media, Inc. (AMI) in Boca Raton, Florida based upon the death of one AMI employee from anthrax poisoning and heavy spore contamination in the building.


Executive management at FBI Headquarters assigned responsibility for the anthrax investigation (code named “AMERITHRAX”) to the Washington Field Office (WFO), dubbing it the single most important case in the FBI at that time. In October 2002, in the wake of surging media criticism, White House impatience with a seeming lack of investigative progress by WFO, and a concerned Congress that was considering revoking the FBI’s charter to investigate terrorism cases, Defendant FBI Director Mueller reassigned Plaintiff from the FBI’s San Diego Field Office to the Inspection Division at FBI Headquarters and placed Plaintiff in charge of the AMERITHRAX case as an “Inspector.” While leading the investigation for the next four years, Plaintiff’s efforts to advance the case met with intransigence from WFO’s executive management, apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, politically motivated communication embargos from FBI Headquarters, and yet another preceding and equally erroneous legal opinion from Defendant Kelley – all of which greatly obstructed and impeded the investigation.


On July 6, 2006, Plaintiff provided a whistleblower report of mismanagement to the FBI’s Deputy Director pursuant to Title 5, United States Code, Section 2303. Reports of mismanagement conveyed in writing and orally included: (a) WFO’s persistent understaffing of the AMERITHRAX investigation; (b) the threat of WFO’s Agent in charge to retaliate if Plaintiff disclosed the understaffing to FBI Headquarters; (c) WFO’s insistence on staffing the AMERITHRAX investigation principally with new Agents recently graduated from the FBI Academy resulting in an average investigative tenure of 18 months with 12 of 20 Agents assigned to the case having no prior investigative experience at all; (d) WFO’s eviction of the AMERITHRAX Task Force from the WFO building in downtown Washington and its relegation to Tysons Corner, Virginia to free up space for Attorney General Ashcroft’s new pornography squads; (e) FBI Director’s Mueller’s mandate to Plaintiff to “compartmentalize” the AMERITHRAX investigation by stove piping the flow of case information and walling off task force members from those aspects of the case not specifically assigned to them – a move intended to stem the tide of anonymous media leaks by government officials regarding details of the investigation. [Lambert complained about compartmentalizing and stovepiping of the investigation in a 2006 declaration.  See this, this and this]


This sequestration edict decimated morale and proved unnecessary in light of subsequent civil litigation which established that the media leaks were attributable to the United States Attorney for the District of the District of Columbia and to a Supervisory Special Agent in the FBI’s National Press Office, not to investigators on the AMERITHRAX Task Force; (f) WFO’s diversion and transfer of two Ph.D. Microbiologist Special Agents from their key roles in the investigation to fill billets for an 18 month Arabic language training program in Israel; (g) the FBI Laboratory’s deliberate concealment from the Task Force of its discovery of human DNA on the anthrax-laden envelope addressed to Senator Leahy and the Lab’s initial refusal to perform comparison testing; (h) the FBI Laboratory’s refusal to provide timely and adequate scientific analyses and forensic examinations in support of the investigation; (i) Defendant Kelley’s erroneous and subsequently quashed legal opinion that regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) precluded the Task Force’s collection of evidence in overseas venues; (j) the FBI’s fingering of Bruce Ivins as the anthrax mailer; and, (k) the FBI’s subsequent efforts to railroad the prosecution of Ivins in the face of daunting exculpatory evidence.


Following the announcement of its circumstantial case against Ivins, Defendants DOJ and FBI crafted an elaborate perception management campaign to bolster their assertion of Ivins’ guilt. These efforts included press conferences and highly selective evidentiary presentations which were replete with material omissions. Plaintiff further objected to the FBI’s ordering of Plaintiff not to speak with the staff of the CBS television news magazine 60 Minutes or investigative journalist David Willman, after both requested authorization to interview Plaintiff.


In April 2008, some of Plaintiff’s foregoing whistleblower reports were profiled on the CBS television show 60 Minutes. This 60 Minutes segment was critical of FBI executive management’s handling of the AMERITHRAX investigation, resulting in the agency’s embarrassment and the introduction of legislative bills calling for the establishment of congressional inquiries and special commissions to examine these issues – a level of scrutiny the FBI’s Ivins attribution could not withstand.


After leaving the AMERITHRAX investigation in 2006, Plaintiff continued to publicly opine that the quantum of circumstantial evidence against Bruce Ivins was not adequate to satisfy the proof-beyond-a-reasonable doubt threshold required to secure a criminal conviction in federal court. Plaintiff continued to advocate that while Bruce Ivins may have been the anthrax mailer, there is a wealth of exculpatory evidence to the contrary which the FBI continues to conceal from Congress and the American people.

Exonerating Evidence for Ivins

Agent Lambert won't publicly disclose the exculpatory evidence against Ivins. As the New York Times reports:

[Lambert] declined to be specific, saying that most of the information was protected by the Privacy Act and was unlikely to become public unless Congress carried out its own inquiry.

But there is already plenty of exculpatory evidence in the public record.

For example:

  • Handwriting analysis failed to link the anthrax letters to known writing samples from Ivins
  • No textile fibers were found in Ivins’ office, residence or vehicles matching fibers found on the scotch tape used to seal the envelopes
  • No pens were found matching the ink used to address the envelopes
  • Samples of his hair failed to match hair follicles found inside the Princeton, N.J., mailbox used to mail the letters
  • No souvenirs of the crime, such as newspaper clippings, were found in his possession as commonly seen in serial murder cases
  • The FBI could not place Ivins at the crime scene with evidence, such as gas station or other receipts, at the time the letters were mailed in September and October 2001
  • Lab records show the number of late nights Ivins put in at the lab first spiked in August 2001, weeks before the 9/11 attacks

As noted above, the FBI didn't want to test the DNA sample found on the anthrax letter to Senator Leahy.  In addition, McClatchy points out:

After locking in on Ivins in 2007, the bureau stopped searching for a match to a unique genetic bacterial strain scientists had found in the anthrax that was mailed to the Post and to NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, although a senior bureau official had characterized it as the hottest clue to date.

Anthrax vaccine expert Meryl Nass. M.D., notes:

The FBI’s alleged motive is bogus. In 2001, Bioport’s anthrax vaccine could not be (legally) relicensed due to potency failures, and its impending demise provided room for Ivins’ newer anthrax vaccines to fill the gap. Ivins had nothing to do with developing Bioport’s vaccine, although in addition to his duties working on newer vaccines, he was charged with assisting Bioport to get through licensure.




The FBI report claims the anthrax letters envelopes were sold in Frederick, Md. Later it admits that millions of indistinguishable envelopes were made, with sales in Maryland and Virginia.




FBI emphasizes Ivins’ access to a photocopy machine, but fails to mention it was not the machine from which the notes that accompanied the spores were printed.

FBI Fudged the Science

16 government labs had access to the same strain of anthrax as used in the anthrax letters.

The FBI admitted that up to 400 people had access to flask of anthrax in Dr. Ivins' lab.  In other words, even if the killer anthrax came from there, 399 other people might have done it.

Moreover, even the FBI's claim that the killer anthrax came from Ivins' flask has completely fallen apart. Specifically, both the National Academy of Science and the Government Accountability Office - both extremely prestigious, nonpartisan agencies - found that FBI’s methodology and procedures for purportedly linking the anthrax flask maintained by Dr. Ivins with the anthrax letters was sloppy, inconclusive and full of holes.  They found that the alleged link wasn’t very strong ... and that there was no firm link.  Indeed, the National Academy of Sciences found that the anthrax mailed to Congressmen and the media could have come from a different source altogether than the flask maintained by Ivins.

Additionally, the Ft. Detrick facility - where Ivins worked - only handled liquid anthrax.  But the killer anthrax was a hard-to-make dry powder form of anthrax.  Ft. Detrick doesn't produce dry anthrax; but other government labs - for example Dugway (in Utah) and (Batelle (in Ohio) - do.

The anthrax in the letters was also incredibly finely ground; and the FBI’s explanation for how the anthrax became so finely ground doesn't even pass the smell test.

Further, the killer anthrax in the letters had a very high-tech  anti-static coating so that the anthrax sample “floated off the glass slide and was lost” when scientists tried to examine it.  Specifically, the killer anthrax was coated with polyglass and each anthrax spore given an electrostatic charge, so that it would repel other spores and “float”.   This was very advanced bio-weapons technology to which even Ivins' bosses said he didn't have access.

Top anthrax experts like Richard Spertzel say that Ivins didn’t do it. Spertzel also says that only 4 or 5 people in the entire country knew how to make anthrax of the "quality" used in the letters, that Spertzel was one of them, and it would have taken him a year with a full lab and a staff of helpers to do it. As such, the FBI's claim that Ivins did it alone working a few nights is ludicrous.

Moreover, the killer anthrax contained silicon ... but the anthrax in Ivins’ flask did not.  The FBI claimed the silicon present in the anthrax letters was absorbed from its surroundings … but Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories completely debunked that theory. In other words, silicon was intentionally added to the killer anthrax to make it more potent.  Ivins and Ft. Detrick didn't have that capability ... but other government labs did.

Similarly, Sandia National Lab found the presence of iron and tin in the killer anthrax … but NOT in Ivins' flask of anthrax.

Sandia also found that there was a strain of bacteria in one of the anthrax letters not present in Ivins’ flask. (The bacteria, iron, tin and silicon were all additives which made the anthrax in the letters more deadly.)

The Anthrax Frame Up

Ivins wasn't the first person framed for the anthrax attacks ...

Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country. And see this.

People don't remember now, but the “war on terror” and Iraq war were largely based on the claim that Saddam and Muslim extremists were behind the anthrax attacks (and see this and this)

And the anthrax letters pushed a terrified Congress into approving the Patriot Act without even reading it. Coincidentally, the only Congressmen who received anthrax letters were the ones who were likely to oppose the Patriot Act.

And - between the bogus Al Qaeda/Iraq claims and the FBI's fingering of Ivins as the killer - the FBI was convinced that another U.S. government scientist, Steven Hatfill, did it.  The government had to pay Hatfill $4.6 million to settle his lawsuit for being falsely accused.

Ivins' Convenient Death

It is convenient for the FBI that Ivins died.

The Wall Street Journal points out:

No autopsy was performed [on Ivins], and there was no suicide note.

Dr. Nass points out:


FBI fails to provide any discussion of why no autopsy was performed, nor why, with Ivins under 24/7 surveillance from the house next door, with even his garbage being combed through, the FBI failed to notice that he overdosed and went into a coma. Nor is there any discussion of why the FBI didn’t immediately identify tylenol as the overdose substance, and notify the hospital, so that a well-known antidote for tylenol toxicity could be given (N-acetyl cysteine, or alternatively glutathione). These omissions support the suggestion that Ivins’ suicide was a convenience for the FBI. It enabled them to conclude the anthrax case, in the absence of evidence that would satisfy the courts.


Indeed, one of Ivins’ colleagues at Ft. Deitrich thinks he was murdered.

Whether murder or suicide, Ivins' death was very convenient for the FBI, as dead men can't easily defend themselves.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mister Delicious's picture
Mister Delicious (not verified) Apr 19, 2015 10:42 AM

Jewish Lobby Controls Key SANCTIONS POWER at Treasury Dept

Soon-to-be Treasury undersecretary will be third Jew to fill post


pine_marten's picture

Hey Chile,  we found a grape with cyanide in it.  You best tow the line..........

Jack Daniels Esq's picture

Since WWII, USG has been one massive, epic fail - morons all

JoJoJo's picture

Also in the news: FBI admits to thousands of errors by forensic examiners.


chilli sauce's picture
chilli sauce (not verified) JoJoJo Apr 19, 2015 4:12 AM

I freelance over th? internet and earn about 80-85$ an hour. I was without a job for 7 months but last month my paycheck with big fat bonus was $15000 just working on my computer from my home for 5-6 hours. Here's what i have been doing... www.globe-report.com

Mi Naem's picture

Are the Tylers overwhelmed by the number and variety of internet attacks on their site,

too disinterested to coordinate an effective response,

or just pissing on the floor in their own house?

Whoa Dammit's picture

Hey GW,

Take a look at this. It's what happens when "safe" fracking water is hit by a lightening strike.


heywood2's picture

Wackoism. one of three things is true:

1.) This guy doesn't have the credentials he claims.

2.) His comments are being grossly distorted.

3.) He's gotten old and suffered some kind of paranoid brain disorder. Google "Pierre Salinger" for details.



litemine's picture

Are you a Minion ?  When even the News tells Known Lies, you still defend what is Conditioning the main Population to many wrongs world wide . This will be the legacy left by Stupid People Like you or are you a BOT. ?

It's too bad we can't ignore responces from idiots like you. Why don't you Fuck Off and Die.....before you Reproduce.

VooDoo6Actual's picture

My surprised look. Since 2004 when W. Bush & DHS did "Operation Dark Winter" the Anthrax scare / Fear Porn / FUD has been in play. Long past Wakey Wakely time to the thugs & criminals. The stoopid still burns...

Mister Delicious's picture
Mister Delicious (not verified) VooDoo6Actual Apr 18, 2015 6:36 PM

twas the neocons - by which is meant Jewish Zionist sayanim - if that's not clear.


Mister Delicious's picture
Mister Delicious (not verified) Apr 18, 2015 4:23 PM


Modern-day Zionist Israel is NOT the Israel of the Bible because it is comprised of converted Jews and not of Hebrews with whom God had the Old Contract.

It was founded in 1948 on stolen Palestinian land by Ashkenazi Zionists.

They forged Modern-day Israel by means of terrorist groups such as the Irgun. They terrorized the Palestinian population, killed thousands upon thousands, and forced hundreds of thousands out of their homes and into neighboring Arab countries. Said dispossession is known as the Nakba.

Subsequently, these non-Semitic non-Hebraic non-Israelite Ashkenazi Zionist Jews renamed the land Israel in order to hoodwink gullible Christians in the West.

Through deceit and bribery Israel’s devilish minions exercise a malevolent, pernicious, and insidious influence on the Church and on the US Government in order to keep Israel’s faulty foundation from crumbling.

“That stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is going down the drain,” explained Evangelist Billy Graham to President Nixon.

Unfortunately a lot of misinformed Christians have been led to believe by crafty Zionists that if they bless Israel, God will bless them because of this biblical passage:

“The Lord said to Abram… I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.” Genesis 12:2-3 (emphasis added)

That verse is clearly directed at Abram himself to whom God was talking and not at anyone else. In addition, the nation God was describing was the nation that would spawn out of Christ, Abraham’s seed. A Christian nation that would include all the families of the earth. A Nation that would span the globe.

“And in your seed all the families of the earth shall be blessed…” Genesis 26: 4

That nation could hardly be the racist state of Israel which can’t even coexist with its Palestinian neighbors let alone all the families of the earth. Talk about Chutzpah!

Furthermore, if one wants to bless Christians, great! A reward awaits you. But if blood-thirsty Israelis are going to kill Christians in Gaza, beware. A different kind of reward also awaits.



JoJoJo's picture

Isaac, Jacob and on down the physical line were also given blessings. Including promises to Moses and David's descendents.

scaleindependent's picture

Wow, I have rarely seen such a virulent attack on a post from GW.  The attacks are irrational, desperate and come from multiple posters.

Good job George Washington's blog. I am sure you are into something to deserve so warrantless personal attacks.

chunga's picture

some of 'em seem to be here just for that purpose...musta struck a nerve

I M DeMan's picture

That whole anthrax thing smelled fishy right from the start. The facts did not seem credible imo. Good report George.

IntercoursetheEU's picture

A curious detail: The upper case lettering in the notes sent, slightly larger in first letter of a word, slightly smaller in subsequent lettering in a word. Not the kind of detail that would occur to a foreigner not educated in US typographical standards, and harder to trace using conventional standards of American handwriting analysis. This is the style of typography commonly found on American tombstones and monuments.

WOWurstupid's picture

It had to be the Israelis George

Shitgum Suicide's picture
Shitgum Suicide (not verified) Apr 18, 2015 2:08 PM

Hey Georgie why is you never seem to mention Waco and the government slaughter of civilians and subsequent cover up that followed? Why is it that you don't mention ruby ridge like the Joeblowinvester asks?

Because maybe you can't find bush or other republicans to blame.

Seeings how you like to keep digging certain a pasts why don't you do an expose' on the internment of the Japanese, or the confederacy and the democrat part or the KKK.

You could also do an extended article about the hidden agenda of the education system and how it gets you to buy into government bullshit meant to hear the sheep to work for govt and corporations.

You could finish of with history of planned parenthood and Margaret Sanger. Here's Hillary clitongue admiring her very much, her vision you know.


But that would require you being intellectually honest so I guess not.



"At the end of the war, Eccles helped to lay out the agreements that created the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in 1946. He was a strong advocate of the Marshall Plan for European Reconstruction in 1948-1949; and was on the Advisory Board of the Export-Import Bank. President Harry S. Truman failed to reappoint Eccles as chairman of the Board of Governors in 1948 but retained him as vice chairman until 1951, when Marriner resigned.

Marriner resumed active participation in his family's various businesses, including First Security Corporation, Amalgamated Sugar Company, and Utah Construction Company. As the latter got into mining, it was renamed Utah Construction and Mining, still later as Utah International, Inc. Under Marriner's leadership the firm was sold to General Electric in 1976. Marriner Eccles was also active in speaking and writing about three issues that concerned him: world overpopulation; U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War; and the recognition of Red China."



Eccles and Sanger both born in the late 19th century. They connected through WorldPopulationEmergencyCampaign circa 1960

[Edit: Look! There's a guy named Scripps on the WPEC list! What are the odds it's, golly, somehow related to this Scripps:


never mind all that, look at that May2015 compared to May2013 chartporn! At that rate of increase we'll be 475 headed for 500ppm not too long after 2050.

800,000 years




argued YOUR case-no reply . LULZ , it's a big data world after all. 

[Edit: and Happy 4-20, The League Of Nations (which also had a drug policy) died 20APR46 . long live the UN??? Evo ROCKS!]

"On 19 April 1946, the President of the Assembly, Carl J. Hambro of Norway, declared "the twenty-first and last session of the General Assembly of the League of Nations closed".[189] The League of Nations ceased to exist the following day.[191]"


WOWurstupid's picture

George just hates Jews. Ask him about the Liberty and the Captain admitting he was warned to stop sending intelligence to the Egyptians and Jordanians. Only George's friends who support hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood are good folks. Oh and the poor Palis who would kill us and laugh.  

Clarabell's picture

It sounds like you're admitting that the Israelis deliberately attacked the USS Liberty (about time!). Imagine the captain of a U.S. Navel ship not taking orders from the Israelis about where to send intelligence! The Israelis had every right to blow them out of the water for such insolence. That would result in a courts marshal for the captain in this day and age.

Joebloinvestor's picture

WACO, where the FBI's INSIDE GUY told them ,"Do not enter the compound".

The agenda already non stoppable, they did and then LIED about the facts during the followup investigation.

Element's picture

The MSM goes into a spasm ... of snoring.

Joebloinvestor's picture

Ivins was a stalking douchebag who pointed the finger at Hatfill and the FBI (as stupid as they are) believed him.


What the FBI doesn't want anyone to see is the process of harassment and intimidation used against "persons of interest".

Anyone remember Mr. Jewel of Atlantic bombing fame?

How about Ruby Ridge?

q99x2's picture

The US is run by a bunch of ciminals. Arrest them before they arrest you.

Seek_Truth's picture

Horses like to run. Close the barn door before they escape.




SMC's picture

Great article, I enjoyed reading it.  :-)

Thanks GW!  

Shitgum Suicide's picture
Shitgum Suicide (not verified) Apr 18, 2015 10:07 AM

De omnibus dubitandum est

Especially GW

Shitgum Suicide's picture
Shitgum Suicide (not verified) Apr 18, 2015 9:53 AM

I notice you never seem to mention Richard Jewel who was framed by NBC and the govt under slick willy for the Olympic Park bombing. Or the terrorist connection to the Oklahoma City bombing that slick willy and the
Feds tried to pretend there never was.

Jayna Davis wrote a book called the third terrorist where she provides the evidence to show mcveigh and Nichols travelled to maylasia at the same place where a know terrorist cell had been meeting.

When they got back they were very proficient in building bombs. Before that they couldn't blow up a milk carton full of gas as explained by a witness and friend .

But I guess that doesn't fit your schtick about how all this terrorism is just made up now does it?

Clarabell's picture

Hay this could be fun. Let's try to think up all the things GW didn't mention in his article, no matter how non relevant they are. GW never mentioned the dancing Islraelis during 9/11 for example. The list could be endless. What fun!

Shitgum Suicide's picture
Shitgum Suicide (not verified) Clarabell Apr 18, 2015 9:43 PM

We raz GW, for many reasons but he only focuses on certain people and ideologies. I've crticized on many a posts and they are for using links to bull rap that doesn't say what he says it says to make a point he can't be making with the false proof to come to specific conclusions that are about disinformation, not informing.

He is crticized for a reason

Dan The Man's picture

You should just eat whatever the government feeds you.  Dont hurt your brain.

Shitgum Suicide's picture
Shitgum Suicide (not verified) Apr 18, 2015 9:45 AM

Keepin It real hey pimp? More garbage from the garbage man. You really like scrapping that bottom part don't you.? I still find it hard to believe you have people who believe you if they the time and investigate your "links" outside of you bullshit blog.

I could fill up most of the pages including the comments with the false you provide as well as the false Conclusions you draw. And I will be happy to if the Tyler's give me a contributors post some day.

But here to hound you is what I'll be doing seeings how the Tyler's won't give me a chance to shine and you never answer the criticisms about your investigative reporting.

Pancho de Villa's picture
Pancho de Villa (not verified) Shitgum Suicide Apr 18, 2015 2:15 PM


He, he, he… Es too funny when trolls.gov get so hysterical trying to discredit such well researched and well referenced articles as GW provides in his blog. Let's put a spotlight on this Shitball, shall we?


In the above post, grammatically juvenile, we read slander, insults, opinions, and outright lies. There is not a shred of credibility in a single SS post. Reading "pimp", "garbage man", etc. is not even amusing… "links"? The links provided by GW are excellent; such mainstream sources as WSJ, NYT, and more credible sources such as Salon. Great article here, GW, thanks for the link! - 




Oh yeah, and at the bottom, "Tyler's won't give me a chance to shine"… Now That's Fucking Hilarious! I don't care how much you polish it, Shit just does NOT shine! 


SMC's picture

The Tyler's have good taste!  ROFL.

That said I enjoy reading your comments too, they often provide GW's articles a Streisand effect halo when I mention one of his articles to others.


xavi1951's picture


Good article until you put in the excupatory bullet points.  None of them, are of value in disproving Ivans as  guilty.  For instance, 

  • Samples of his hair failed to match hair follicles found inside the Princeton, N.J., mailbox used to mail the letters

What is the science on hair follicle transfer while mailing letters?  Too many variables.

  • No souvenirs of the crime, such as newspaper clippings, were found in his possession as commonly seen in serial murder cases

Unlike TV shows, serial criminals DO NOT commonly save souvenirs.  They get off on the crime and avoid evidence that would link them to the crimes.  In 28 + yrs of dealing with criminals, I never saw a single one with souvenirs.  Some may, but few do.

Basically, I thought it was a thorough article, written by an attorney, except for the bullets.

Augustus's picture

more horse shit from Geo Wash.

Of course the whole thing was not a sham.

People died from Anthrax.  That is not a sham.

Just because the FBI was unable to identify or arrest the person who created the unique form does not make it a sham at all.  the stuff came from a very sophisticated operation that was not done in someone's basement.  the involvent of a government lab service is most likely to explain the very much "improved" version.

Geo Wash is the sham.

apocalypticbrother's picture

It has been known since about a week after the attack that Dr. Philip Zack is the zionist that removed the samples which were mailed to Brokaw etc.  But you know that already.

LithiumWarsWAKEUP's picture

    With logic such as yours, does that make you 'hamburger boy'? Maybe go study the definition of 'zionist'. See if you can find something similar to 'christian zionist'. Heck, maybe you can even find a 'non-religious zionist'?  Maybe an 'atheist zionist' is also 'allowed'? Know any 'arab zionists'? No? Yes?

Reaper's picture

Trust nothing from government, nor its hacks in the FBI. Watch this short video (5 minute) about FBI tactics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgDsbjAYXcQ

The sheeple were trained by the media to fear the capabilities of the FBI. The sheeple see threats of capture and prosecution by the FBI on commercial recordings. The FBI's successes are because the gullible believe FBI testimony as sacred in federal courts. The sheeple would allow the FBI to question them without a recording the interview. Even Nixon trusted the acting head of the FBI, who was Deep Throat. And the reporters, Bernstein and Woodward, trusted the acting head of the FBI. Nixon was taken down, not by legal acts of the FBI, but by internal intrigues.

Trust in government or its FBI is for fools.

the great rift's picture
the great rift (not verified) Reaper Apr 17, 2015 10:02 PM

I think, I can never earn over which I paid by my precedent employer, but I was wrong, world is so large to try their fate.but now I am making $92/hr even more, can easily minimum $1700/week, on the experience everyone must try to do work online, easy way to earn, here's an example what I do... www.globe-report.com

MontgomeryScott's picture

I think, Google Translate must be not working quite as well in your boiler room.

GuusjA's picture

Maandag begint de negende onderhandelingsronde tussen de EU en de VS over TTIP (Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership). Er begint flink schot in de gesprekken te komen nu Griekenland heeft aangegeven dat 'alle 24 hoofdstukken' moeten worden getoetst aan de 3e SpinozaGolf. 




Feit is dat HollywoodHillarY de touwtjes niet meer in handen heeft. De Saudische koning Salman Saudi-Arabië wil president Hadi aan de macht te houden en doet dit met 'luchtaanvallen op Houthi-stellingen in Jemen'!?!?!




Commissaris Cecilia Malmström (Handel) bezweert dat overheden de baas blijven over de waterbedrijven als ze dat willen en dat vakbonds- en werknemersrechten absoluut niet in het geding zijn. Ook voor de omstreden speciale arbitragecolleges om investeerders te beschermen belooft ze een Europees verantwoorde oplossing. Maar ook voor haar geldt: vooralsnog telt alleen het gesproken woord, er ligt immers nog geen tekst.




Eerst moet minister Stef Blok (Rijksdienst) namelijk tegen de oudere rijksambtenaren vertellen dat met de invoering van het DAB-systeem ze ineens VRIJ zijn!


williambanzai7's picture

Have you read the TOS of this website which says that commentors are not permitted to engage in advertising without the permission of the site owner.

I believe there is a very good case that you are liable for conversion of digital property. This means you are subject to compensating the website for commercial ad space as well as punitive damages since you have been warned perviously you prevert. 

Bumbu Sauce's picture

My word, you have the whole world figurert, dey gunna be after u.


429 connections.  FOUR HUNDRED AND TWENTY NINE!  There has to be something there.  hmmmm.

Captain Nukem's picture

Richard Lambert is the guy focused the investigation on Steven Hatfill for six years and very publicly declared him to be the FBI's chief suspect. Eventually Hatfill was exonerated, Lambert was removed, and the FBI eventually paid a $5.8 million dollar settlement to Hatfill. Reading between the lines, it appears that Lambert was sidelined (and probably lost any chances for promotion) because his superiors feel he botched the investigation. Now he is bitter and is badmouthing the FBI in the press to get even.

I would certainly agree that Lambert's investigation was a sham and it destroyed the reputation of HatFill even though there was never really any solid eviidence against him.

As rar as whether Ivin's was guilty, who knows? He was definitely a wierd guy but the case against him was far from rock solid. The objections about the silicon and other trace elements could be explained if he transferrered some of the organisms from the original flask to another flask where he grew them for the attacks. But to me, the evidence against him is all circumstantial and rather thin. The FBI tactic of publically fingering the suspect in hopes that he will crack might possibly have driven him to suicide.