Assessing The Bund Shortage And Weighing Mario Draghi's Q€ Expansion Options

Tyler Durden's picture

On Monday, we highlighted the following question posed by David Einhorn to Mario Draghi: “Mario Draghi says he sees no sign of a bubble in the sovereign debt market, which raises the question: what does Mr. Draghi think a bubble in sovereign debt might look like that isn’t already evident?”

Late last week, we echoed this sentiment when we remarked that “just because you don’t yet own all of something doesn’t mean you are not making something scarce kind of like just because you can still get water out of the faucet in California doesn’t mean there’s not a drought, and if one key indicator of scarcity in credit markets is the degree to which certain issues trade special then Draghi is either ignoring the ‘evidence’ or he doesn’t know what evidence of scarcity looks like.” Then this morning, Bill Gross offered his two cents, calling 10-year Bunds “the short of a lifetime” (will Mario Draghi dare anyone to put the trade on?). 

Given all of the skepticism, it seems logical to ask the following: “who is still buying Bunds at these levels besides the ECB?” Here’s Citi with more:

The most frequent client question is not based around economics or any market technicals but simply, ‘who is buying Bunds at these levels’. The question usually comes with a look of incredulity. Other than the ECB buying, Figure 1 shows the net buying by investor classification, based on Citi’s flows, which we think are representative of the market. The data shows that banks and asset managers have been the biggest buyers in the most weeks. Hedge funds had been short (perhaps erroneously positioned for a Fed QE style reaction) while pension and insurance industry flow has been more stable. Netting out all investors, German government bond flows are positive (more buying than selling), excluding central banks. Why? As we have remarked before, banks are buyers and likely to extend duration, while asset managers will be funding it costly to be short Bunds given the performance, even in global funds which tend to have more room to short core European bonds. 

As Citi goes on to note, the expansion of PSPP-eligible assets did not include any new German issues, meaning that the Bundesbank’s job (i.e. hitting its monthly targets as per the capital key) isn’t about to get any easier and the scarcity that Mario Draghi says doesn’t exist isn’t likely to dissipate. 

The headline here is that there were no changes to the existing German QE pool. The Bundesbank clearly decided against taking more risk in FMSWER purchases for example, which remain off the eligible PSPP security list. That continues the squeeze on Bunds. 

And as we’ve noted on too many occasions to count, the very design of Q€ makes its full implementation questionable because there’s a certain degree to which it becomes a victim of its own success — that is, the more successful the ECB is at driving down yields, the less assets there are to buy because the program doesn’t allow for purchases below the depo rate. Put differently, the depo rate floor and the program’s goal aren’t entirely compatible... 

The market is exercised by the risk of QE execution failure in some core market simply because of the ECB QE design flaws. Conceptually, there is a problem in setting a quantity as well as a yield floor (-20bp). In practical terms, what concerns the market is that as the market rallies, the ECB is forced to buy further out on the curve, as more and more paper trades below -20bp. Figure 5 shows that without a yield floor the current market value of government bonds available to buy would be over €902bn. 

Citi sees the ECB having to go out to 7-years on the Bund curve in the space of just six weeks in order to stay above the depo rate assuming current trends hold...

Based on current yield trends, the buying will have to start at the 7y point in just 6-weeks, and will take the eligible pool of paper available down to €516bn on our estimates. With a 25% issue limit that means a maximum size of €129bn is possible, and that would make it a close race as to whether the ECB can actually buy the near €144bn total QE volume that we expect in German sovereigns. 

In our view, the September meeting is likely to be key rendezvous point for discussing technical difficulties in some core countries on the available pool of paper to complete the programme. This would follow July where there is a huge negative supply of -€146bn, measured as issuance minus coupons, redemptions and ECB buying. 

And the ECB will have to make “adjustments”, because if they do not, they risk a “forced” taper and the attendant “tantrum” and it would not look good for Mario Draghi — who has made it very clear that he intends to see PSPP implemented in full — to have to later admit that the ECB will in fact not be able to carry out the program as promised. As we’ve discussed previously, the central bank’s options for freeing up more purchasable assets include raising the issue limit on non-CAAC bonds to 50%, buying corporate bonds, lowering the depo rate, or removing the floor altogether. Here’s Citi again:

Opening up the limit on bonds would help on the technical issue of not having enough paper to buy to complete the programme and we have noted in the past that there is no obvious reason why the ECB limit on non-CAC paper can not be higher than 25%. For instance, if the ECB bought non-CAC paper to a 50% limit, this would increase the eligible paper in 2y to 30y that is not trading below -20bp, by €294bn in Germany, compared to €176bn eligible paper under current rules.

 

Buy corporate debt: The idea is to keep the sanctity of the €60bn monthly purchase number to get the balance sheet to right-size. – The problem is that corporate spreads are also tight and not representative of euro area funding, but nevertheless, this could be a fall back option.  

Note also here that buying corporate debt may be inevitable anyway because, as we discussed last week, the further below zero the risk-free rate falls, the wider spreads to corporate credit become, leading to mispriced risk, something the ECB may need to step in and "correct" (and by "correct" we mean drive rates on corporate bonds below zero in a complete perversion of credit markets). 

Cut the deposit rate: Draghi has ruled this out but one argument often heard is that cutting the deposit rate would open up room for more buying as the new yield floor would be at a lower deposit rate. – We see this argument as weak, primarily because we expect yields to collapse to the new depo rate, given that banks will continue to treat high quality paper as fungible with central bank reserves. Moreover, the larger tax on the banking system probably infers even more yield seeking behavior. 

 

Remove the -20bp limit: Simply removing the -20bp limit would immediately address the issue. – This is very unlikely. The rationale for imposing the -20bp floor to purchases is the dark side of the risk segregation in that losses as well as profits are kept locally. The Bundesbank for instance would be guaranteed a greater loss on purchases assuming the -20bp deposit rate is not a permanent feature. That is, the Bundesbank’s share of profits from the negative rate to banks, would not offset portfolio losses. 

To sum up the above, 30% of German debt trades at or below the depo rate and some 60% carries a negative yield. The way things are going now, central bank Bund purchases will have to be in maturities of 7 years or more within just 6 weeks, and of course that timeframe could accelerate meaningfully should things take a turn for the worst in Athens.

Ultimately, the math doesn't add up and it appears as though modifications to PSPP's structure will be necessary (perhaps at the ECB's September meeting) in order to prevent a forced taper. Program adjustments may include depo rate cuts, an elimination of the depo rate floor, or, in the most likely scenario, corporate bond purchases. Meanwhile, the Bund curve continues to flatten as yields converge on -0.20% and, as we noted earlier today, "far from being the short of a lifetime right now, Bunds are in fact quite the opposite ... because if the ECB will have no choice but to buy even more Bunds from the private market, then the sellers can demand any prices for these Bunds, up to and including the ECB's hard (for now) floor of -0.20%"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
kaiserhoff's picture

Ah, the joys of Soviet Central Planning.

golden torch's picture
golden torch (not verified) kaiserhoff Apr 21, 2015 10:01 PM

I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do... www.globe-report.com

SWRichmond's picture

There will be crisis, and they will issue a shitload of debt onto the backs of the public, and they will say they needed liquidity for the banks, but it will really have been about creating tradable collateral, just like TARP really was.

Too much leverage and not enough collateral.

Weaponized Innocense's picture
Weaponized Innocense (not verified) Apr 21, 2015 7:08 PM

i don't trust the currencies enough to go over there when it's time to really go long the bond yields as the bloodbath climaxes. Who knows the returns u will end up with with the currency translation. It's hard to invest overseas in times such as these though from our shores we can see the opportunities just out of reach while it is a difficult time to invest in america... Besides doing the long term shorting as my rattlesnake portfolio is set up to do when this market gets real.

At some time I will go long yields in America with definitive courage if hyper inflation is going to be the thing.... But I don't know the unwinding will be difficult thus holding rates down and w could flop over as the Japanese .... When is that when oil comes down to bounce at ten towards twenty bucks a barrel as since the bad economy trumps war. Or not then it rises higher and hurts the economy more....

I had my pop for the fed rate increase and I was gonna sell my long yields in expectation for a fail as I could see that the economy was going to fail as we headed for recession and the fed dared raise rates and a depression if it failed and the fed stimulated into the fail to hold up the market....
Who knows what the fed will do now... Bonds been pretty perky lately on the yield side..... Past few days even when market as today was down. They have a mind of their own here just recently as I have been talking about here.

OC Sure's picture

Buba hits its limit and if desired a buyer from Belgium will present themselves.

Luckhasit's picture

i don't care what anybody says, i'm routing for mario.  he told you what it's all about and has called the eu's bluff so many times, hittin up the imf with straight up pocket checks (meaning that he's told the central banks to pay up or italy leaves).

do it mario and drive that shit right into the ground(er).  i'm just waiting to see everybody's reaction, what the fuck do you expect to happen when you piss on an electric fence?

Die Weiße Rose's picture
UK budget shame: Britain has the third highest deficit in Europe and the Government is borrowing more than Greece

Britain has the third biggest budget deficit in Europe and the Government is borrowing even more than Greece, official figures showed yesterday.

The UK racked up a deficit of 5.7 per cent of gross domestic product last year while the national debt soared to 89.4 per cent of national income, according to Eurostat.

Cyprus and Spain were the only countries in the European Union to borrow more as a proportion of national income – underlining the British government’s abject failure to live within its means.

Governments are forced to borrow money if they spend more on public services and other areas such as welfare than they earn in tax receipts.

Even crisis-torn Greece ran a smaller deficit than the UK last year – as did other debt-riddled countries including Ireland, France, Italy and Portugal.

Philip Shaw, economist at Investec, said: ‘The fact that the UK is borrowing more than Greece as a proportion of its economy shows the extent to which more work is need to get the deficit down. The Government has done well so far, but the job is not finished.’

Britain has been running a deficit since then Labour chancellor Gordon Brown started splashing out at the turn of the century.

The deficit hit a record £153billion in 2009-10 as Labour lost control of the public finances in the Great Recession. It fell to £90billion last year under the Coalition but the report from Eurostat underlines the scale of the challenge facing the next government to balance the books.

The report also highlights just how risky it would be for whoever wins power to relax austerity and increase public spending – as planned by Labour and the Scottish National Party.

The Tories have promised to return Britain to the black in 2018-19 and run the country’s first surplus since 2001.

But Labour has failed to match the pledge and could still be borrowing around £30billion a year by the end of the decade.

The SNP, meanwhile, has gone even further, with Nationalist leader Nicola Sturgeon pledging ‘an end to austerity’ and demanding a £148billion spending spree.

Howard Archer, economist at IHS Global Insight, said: ‘Getting the deficit down remains very much a work in progress. For all the promises being made by the various political parties ahead of the General Election, the fact is that getting the budget deficit down will have to remain a priority.

‘The still substantial deficit highlights that there cannot credibly be an end to austerity – whatever the SNP may argue.’

The UK had the ninth largest debt pile in the EU last year as a proportion of GDP, according to Luxembourg-based Eurostat.

The national debt built up over the years has soared to £1.5trillion and is due to top £1.6trillion in the coming years – or £64,000 per household in Britain.

Government debt in the eurozone hit a record 91.9 per cent of GDP at the end of last year – the highest level since the single currency was introduced in 1999.

Greece was the worst offender with debts of 177.1 per cent of national income followed by Italy at 132.1 per cent and Portugal with 130.2 per cent. Across the EU, 16 countries including Britain are in breach of the region’s 60pc debt limit.

George Osborne last week won praise from the International Monetary Fund as well as his German counterpart Wolfgang Schaeuble for his handling of the economy.

However, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has criticised the main parties for failing to outline exactly how they will get the deficit under control – leaving voters in the dark as they head to the ballot box next month.

Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-3049622/UK-budget-shame-Britain-highest-deficit-Europe-Government-borrowing-Greece.html#ixzz3XzkNQXvw