This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Caught On Tape: Cop Grabs, Smashes Phone Of Woman Recording Him
"He told me that I had to go. He said I was interfering with their investigation and I told [him] that I was on a public sidewalk and I had the right to film them.." And then this happened...
As MyFOXLA reports,
Beatriz Paez says she was doing nothing wrong taking video of U.S. Marshal executing warrants on San Juan Avenue Sunday. She saw people in handcuffs. “Around 8 people including women were held at gunpoint on their stomachs with their hands held behind their back,” says Paez.
But, when one marshal saw her recording, “He told me that I had to go. And, I told him I had the right to film and he said I was interfering with their investigation and I told them that I was on a public sidewalk and I had the right to film them.”
...the courts have consistently held that the First Amendment protects citizens' right to record the police when they're on the job. The police can't stop you unless you're interfering with their work -- and they can't take away your smart phone or delete the recordings just because you took video.
Police need a warrant to mess with the content of your cell phone.
* * *
Apparently not...
»
- 123966 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
MOTHER FUCK THE POLICE...
Is it correct jargon to call a federal marshall a cop?
Never was really clear to me....
Absolutely not. A more appropriate term would be LEECH or perhaps PIG
From her website on the Internet, Beatriz Paez is someone you don't mess with. If she can, she will get her story on the network news, even if the Stasi authorities issue a secret D-notice on the basis of protecting cops' identities. The cops are all about protecting their drug cartel employers and crushing outside competition from independent drug dealers like biker gangs.
Hey Mister policeman,
riding that police van,
smashing heads when you can,
'cause you're such a tool!
I wanna put doughnuts on your grave,
I wanna put doughnuts on your grave,
I wanna put doughnuts on your grave,
I wanna put DOUGHNUTS on your GRAVE!
(From a lyric I wrote while fronting a punk band about 25 years ago. Some things are timeless.)
Grill me all you want, but why was she so damn close? And again, she obviously was antagonizing them because we did not see what she was saying BEFORE she kept running her mouth she had a right to be there. Lame he did that? Sure. But if she stood back further and wasn't being a smart ass or whatever just before this camera started rolling...
All I am saying is just cooperate a little bit, it's common sense. If we know some cops go nuts and fly off the handle why egg them on and try to get that to happen? I surely wouldn't want to cause more problems for myself than I already have LOL.
obviously antagonizing the cops? based upon what evidence? sounds like a story a cop would make up to make himself look like he did the right thing, eh, pig?
lol I'm not a cop but anyone would easily figure out they asked her to step back a little bit after which she refuses and starts blabbing about her rights to be there. why else would she keep saying that? film all you want, but if they ask for a little space, back up. if they tell you to stop filming then thats another argument.
knocking her phone out of her hand and crushing it is not asking her to stop filming? they asked to stop filming and she asserted her rights to film from a safe distance. no one asked to move back apparently implying she was okay to be where she was. the response she gave was in line with someone asking her to stop filming.
there was a crime committed by a person charged with arresting people who commit crimes. there were many witnesses and film from 2 cameras. more than enough for a da to bring charges against the cop. nothing happened. none of these poloice officers did their duty and you want to lay some blame on the victim? and you are not a cop? you went to the wrong school of thinking.
no seriously, the broad was the only one that close. she was saying its her right to be there implying they asked her to back up BEFORE this camera started rolling. she was not a safe distance. she was 10 feet away from the cops. guy filming was ACROSS the street at a reasonable distance. the guy swatted her phone becauae that is the only reason she was so close. go across the syreet and film. if you have ever done any type of work where someone hovers basically over you to watch, you'd realize how annoying it is. I can guarantee if she had kept filming but backed up enough, they would have let her film all she wants. and no really, im not a cop, i own a manufacturing business. to me its just common sense, keep back a bit. If she was across the street and not <10 feet away from the marshalls and this happened then damn straight it would be bullshit. she was too close and running her mouth that she was allowed to be where she was. as lame as it sounds, she asked for the cops to intervene.
"I can guarantee if she had kept filming but backed up enough, they would have let her film all she wants."
-----------------------------------------------
You can't guarantee a Goddamned thing thing you dumb fucking asshole!
Take your pussy assed, coward bullshit and keep it in whatever Yankee State you live in.
There's a reason this kind of shit doesn't happen in Alabama. It's because we're not infested with pussy assed vermin like you.
Do I make myself clear???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fhI4k-n_Jw
and sing!:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyT1buoyTnY
B Dolans "Film The Police" - Song;)
Welcome to the Sturmabteilung (SA) part deux.
The Jews are responsible for all your personal failures and your poverty too, aren't they, Bob? :-)
That or he's on Cass Sunstein's payroll.
Either way he's a sad, twisted soul.
Get ready for more of this from our citys finest. No telling what will happen after Jade Helm 15
IQ capped thugs 4 u donkeys - ZWO
ZioNazi Cops!
Keep up with the Daily Fascist news right here.....
http://www.informationliberation.com/
I like how the cop snuck up on her pretending to look the other way, then bull rushed her. Thats' what cowards do.
and they wonder why they are called pigs. dorner had the right idea. there needs to be many more of him.
Pigs.........a word from the '60s which has become very relevant once again.
More apropos actually considering the size of their girths today. GMO donuts are not your friend.
Miffed
No doubt ? many are way past fat and not even clsoe to fit . Couldn't catch diddly squat or actually conduct a fight for more than 5 seconds before they would get their clock cleaned.
Somebody said it in an above post, people will simply start fighting back and there are many more of us than them ? But can't be fat like them as well. I have no idea why anybody would want to look like that or feel like that. It cant feel good to not be able to breathe and simply live unencumbered ?
Or you see them posing in the gym, big bellies, smith machine, and ever present smart phone.
Girly men. CAn't even do real squats or use a barbell. And can't put down the goddamn phone, even when posing as a fitness enthusiast.
Frauds almost to a man. Backed by a monopoly on violence and a complete lack of accountability.
What's the problem? Gee whiz I can't even imagine.
She is lucky the Nazi didn't kill her.
Idiots,
Stop calling police thugs Nazi. Nazi police was highly professional. Nazi police did not arrest and/or brutalized German citizens without good reasons. Stop repeating Zionist propaganda.
Start to differentiate between a regular police and an occupying force.
I really hate Illinois Nazis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ukFAvYP3UU
The Jew-media already posioned the term and programmed people to knee-jerk "Nazi=Bad!"
It would blow a lot a people's minds to find out there were black and jewish Nazis
Use a donut-shaped phone.
Wrong. The cops would eat it.
Talk about a hedonistic adjustment. See! You can eat your iPhone!
That's what the cop in the video did to her phone...a hedonic adjustment.
Shoulda used an Apple Watch.
If ever there were a valid reasone to own a Google-glass, dealing with cops would be it.
But would the battery have lasted long enough to film it?
Yeh, so they'd be able to smash your face directly into the sidewalk.
Bullish!
They would have smashed her then.
Big lawsuits and no settlement deals, make them pay heavy prices for their storm trooper menality.....
Problem is you and I pay, it's not coming out of their pockets. Punishments with a fucking noose though, that would get the point across. Hang a couple of those filthy pig motherfuckers, and the rest will fall in line.
That's why the individual himself should be sued, not the police department.
The big problem with that is qualified immunity. IMO, the cop wouldn't have it in this case, but it is the first line of defense that will be brought up nearly 100% of the time if you sue a cop individually. They fundamentally either have to be doing something outright criminal (he was in this case,) or they have to be violating "clearly established law" with regards to civil rights (which he was in this case.) The problem is that a lot of this kind of behavior never meakes it into the courtroom with this kind of evidence, and people flat out refuse to believe that it happens. Well, that's changing, but in the meantime, you've gotta live through the period of change.
Qualified immunity is unconstitutional as it denies equal protection under the law. It is also a noxious idea based upon the idea of soveriegn immunity which has no place in a country that denies any legitimacy of a sovereign.
Better yet, change the law so that the lawsuits judgements/settlements are paid from the individual cop and their union dues and pensions. They will weed out their own bad apples quickly enough that way. Loved that idea when I first read it. Make them feel the pain instead of the taxpayers.
Flacon, And when you speak of suing a cop, I ask how is that working for us so far?
The laws are on the books... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983
and these too http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/federal-statutes/#se...
Oh yeah, keep in mind, when you do this, you not only pay your Attny. fees, but theirs also, in the form of stolen tax $$.
BDSM rules apply; Keep paying for the ass-raping...
Best solution I read was that all settlements/lawsuits costs come out of the police pensions.
We're not done yet here: Basic liability insurance provided via taxpayer funds, but any risky behavior and claims due to officers breaking the law that results in an increase in the insurance premium, has to be paid from the officer's own personal funds.
The best solution is to just shoot the bastards.
No problem. I say let the lawsuits fly. The states are broken anyhow. Tax the fuck out of everyone. Elect Hillary. Blank checks for congress. Banks running wild.
The sooner we get to the logical conclusion, the better. The longer this draws on, the more violent it is going to become.
If you were a buddy, this is when I would say, "I hate you." What I actually hate is that your statement is right and there's a feeling of helplessness that I struggle with.
I hate that logically you are right.
But like pulling off a band-aid, slowly, I fear the outcome of the sudden rip. When this whole thing blows, life will SUCK. Safety nowhere. Thugs on the lose. Wild west shootouts. Hand pumping water. Watching loved ones die.
And that, friends, is why we allow this to continue.
I know exactly how you feel. I absolutely hate that I keep coming to same conclusion. Not as much for myself. But for my kids.
+1000 that.
saw it stated another way in a video talk by Jeff "skunk" Baxter, Doobie Brothers guitarist, and defense analyst (no shit)
to a room full of .mil types:
"how many of you would be willing to take a bullet for your country?"
all hands go up
"how many of you would be willing to lose your job for your country? (in the context of doing something different to fix this mess)
*crickets* not one hand up...
isn't that the irony? we pay for the protection of the .1%.
KnuckleDragger-X Big lawsuits and no settlement deals, make them pay heavy prices for their storm trooper menality.....
---
That won't work until the laws are changed. Even when the police lose a lawsuit, it is the taxpayer that pays for it, not the individual police person. You have to make the specific police person liable for their own actions.
IMO, you could sue the individual cop in this particular case. Which is what should happen, but he doesn't have the money that a municipality does.
The problem is that they are legally acting on behalf of the state. And in today's lawsuit crazy world, without that sort of protection, public services on a whole would vanish overnight out of fear.
Not disagreeing with you at all. Just adding that it is a major catch-22.
That's fine, I hope it disappears. Since it doesn't appear to be reform-able, abolish the entire institution. Fuck em. If they don't feel like they are capable of doing their jobs without qualified immunity for abusing people and their property, they can find honest work. The ONLY legitimate function of and police force is to protect against or investigate crimes against persons or their property. Victimless, vice type crimes obviously not included. I'm going to go out on a limb as at those assholes were probably not investigating or preventing a real crime either. IMO she would have been perfectly justified in shooting his ass, as id at tht qualified for assault, and she had a very legitimate fear of him inflicting death or serious bodily injury against her.
You mean without "insurance," like in every other profession?
No. In private professions, insurance only goes so far. You can still be sued as a person. It does not dismiss your civil liability. Insurance is just a financial buffer. And for cops, the cost would get shifted anyhow right back one the public. It all boils down the $ either way, absent the personal liability.
Likewise, penalizing thier pension funds will only kick up more financial problems. Cops will simply turn up the heat on generating ticket and confiscation revenue. The whole shit storm will just spool up even further.
What another poster said here is that these folks need to start getting slammed personally for civil rights abuses at least. Brought up on criminal charges where appropriate. No more grand jury/DA reach arounds either. And if convicted of a crime or abuse above a particular preset level, say goodbye to pension asshole. And/or jail time, fines, etc.
The maggot was a marshal. He was not acting on behalf of the state. he was acting outside of fderal property where he has no jurisdiction. He was in the process of committing a crime against the people he arrested when he committed the assault on the woman filming him.
Big noisy court cases played out in public for a long period of time. This is how the progressives have done it for decades and it directly affects politics, especially if it can be made even slightly racial or sexist. The entire system is completely screwed up so it needs to be broken completely where everybody can see it.
Minneapolis has been unwilling, for decades, to root out the small percentage of cops whose behavior accounts for millions of dollars in payouts annually. I read in a story about one case, that the city itself doesn't pay the settlements. They have insurance which does that. And the insurance is subsidized in such a way that premiums don't rise, nor is coverage cancelled, for repeated claims and payouts.
I'd support an initiative that forced cops to purchase their own individual liability insurance. Many professionals have to do this as a condition of working in their field. I do. I buy a $2,000,000 General Liability policy, which costs me about $1,700 per year. I imagine police work, being somewhat more risky than my profession, would cost more; perhaps twice as much. I wouldn't mind the City reimbursing officers for that coverage. But then, when there is an incident and a lawsuit, the City would contest (or choose not to contest) their own liability, and the officer and his insurance carrier would have to defend the officer's conduct and liability. If an insurer had to pay out too much, they'd drop the policy, just as if I kept filing claims on my car or home, or on my General Liability policy. Then the officer would be uninsurable, and thus unemployable. That would have solved several problems in Minneapolis over the past few years, where the same cops keep coming up in situations where the police introduce violence into situations that had not been violent until they arrived.
if a cop knew his life would be destroyed for being an asshole cops would be really friendly with the public and perhaps focus on real crime for a change.
But, there is less $ in busting real crime.
It's dangerous too. Better go after Mr. & Mrs. average American.
Insurance coverage that does not cancel, adjust, etc. for claims is not insurance. Otherwise, the insurer would go out of business.
That cannot be anything more than a backdoor to taxpayers paying for the bad behavior.
Having cops carry individual insurance, whether reimbursed or not, I think ends with the same sort of mess anyhow. Just a conduit for an insurer to make a fortune off of the back of taxpayers... or the State just sets up another smoke and mirrors trick.
The concept of cops representing the State removes them from liability associated with the proper actions of thier jobs. It should not be protecting them from criminal actions, civil rights abuses, etc. The real problem here is simply that the law is not being applied equally. The solution is simply to apply the law equally.
When people want to take pictures of me, or want to film, i want them to ask for permission FIRST. Can't blame the cop.
Police are public servants being paid with taxpayer funds. You, on the other hand, are a privately funded moron.
It's a matter of privacy and respect. With no mutual respect, everything is lost, as you can see in police behaviour.
Congrats, now you are a double moron
If you are in a public area, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.
But you're forgetting that some animals are moar equal than others.
.
It's a matter of pig fuckers that get their jollies by playing Billy Badass and knowing they'll get away with it because they wear a badge.
You are ,obviously, retarded. Since when have police had ANY respect for the public?
You, obviously, don't know the definition of "mutual"
1. (of a feeling or action) experienced or done by each of two or more parties toward the other or others.I suppose you think if she would have turned and run that that balded headed pos would have been justified in shooting her in the back?
YOU ARE A MORON!
You are one fucked up society. Now i understand why it's going to be a mess when the dollar goes down.
Phone call for you... someone named "kettle"?
Only if you are dumb enough to save in fiat.
Don't employers have the right to film employees?, if you don't like it get a new job that does not require being a leech.
No, employers don't have that right over here. And the NSA doesn't have the right to peek in your asshole.
When my employer is filming me, i'll tell him to shove it. F*cking fascists.
Employers don't have a right to take video of their employees while they're at work? LOL!
Culture. You don't trust me? Don't hire me.
LOL! If you come into a place that I own, and I want to film you, you are getting filmed.
When's your birthday?
Keep on diggigng. I've not identified myself on this site, so I have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If I'm walking down the street, I do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Get butthurt about it if you want, it will do you no good.
Oh, and BTW, if I were your employer, I would have your birth date. And your social security number.
Actually, knowing I am filmed at work is the only thing that has kept me from keying my bitch bosses' Mercedes so maybe there are cases where filming is a good thing.
Miffed
OK
It's not simply about trust.
How can I verify that proceedures are being followed correctly in hazardous industrial environments if I can't review what's being done? People make mistakes, and those can be very costly, including loss of life. In that event, I want to know what happened so it doesn't happen again. I imagine the families of victims, not to mention insurance co's, unions, trade associations and the general public would also like to know.
I've seen these consequences first hand. If I'm working in a hazardous environment, I prefer that the people I'm working with understand the consequences of errors and ommisions in the course of their duties. It makes all of us safer, and it gets rid of those who can't, or won't perform their job correctly.
Incidentally, a lot of companies use these videos in their training programs. It makes a far greater impact if you can see exactly what when wrong, as opposed to just describing it in written or verbal form.
Trust, but Verfiy, because SAFETY always comes FIRST.
The only piss test you're getting from me is a taste test.
You are filmed everyday in public. Everytime you go into a gas station. Everytime you use a physical bank. Did you ask permission for those daily pictures of you? I think not. Public means public, not private. Clearly you don't understand that.
That's correct. Those cameras are forced down my throat. It's where distrust begins, and it ends in tears. Oh well, when the decline is gaining steam, i guess we need more of the same, moar camera's!
I think the issue is who is wielding the cameras and who sees the videos.
pods
Not to mention that if you're on a public sidewalk, anything that you can do is visible anyway.
Of course if we didn't have those cameras, we wouldn't have video footage of that plane hitting the Pentagon.
oh, wait....
How about the 16 traffic cameras from my previous house to the grocery store 2m down the road. I counted them!
You want privacy? Stay on your own property and build a fence. The cop throwing that phone should have been arrested on the spot by the other law enforcement officers on the scene for destruction of private property. The fact that he wasn't bellies the argument there are no good cops. I'm glad that people are filming everything they can, and even looked into installing video in my car for when I get stopped. In court the officers word carries more weight then a civilians in both the judges eyes and with the jury.
We need more tools at our disposal then less on BOTH sides. It's getting close to all out war already.
You're right. There are NO good cops, just leeches and pigs.
Dead cops are good cops.
Just received my Dashcam 1080 P B40 in the mail yesterday.
It appears as if this is now a necessary thing to have. And we need to cover each other when resisting fascism.
Cameras and drones up the cost of maintaining the facade. I am awaiting the day when TPTB finally say fuck it and pull the curtain back, and all those Govt is your friend people realize they are patsies.
"Just received my Dashcam 1080 P B40 in the mail yesterday."
Does it stream to a remote server?
"The cop throwing that phone should have been arrested on the spot by the other law enforcement officers on the scene for destruction of private property."
The cop should have been arrested for battery, larceny, and criminal damage to property. Fuck it, make it aggrivated battery and armed robbery.
See there is a difference... You are a PRIVATE person but as soon as he puts on his uniform he is a PUBLIC OFFICIAL and as such he serves US. And one of those "US" was also the person filming him.
You Nazi son of a fuck. They are PUBLIC SERVANTS! They gave up that particular right when they chose to serve the public.
If you are in a public space, your right to privacy is the same as those cops - zero
Bingo! Everybody can see what you're doing anyway. Here's a tip: When walking down a public sidewalk, don't make an idiot out of yourself, because there's not a damned thing you can do about people seeing it.
I wonder what she would say if somebody started filming her in a public rest room. I mean, it is public, right? I don't mean in the stalls, I mean just in the rest room.
Do you have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a restroom? A public one? If so, how far does it go?
You can answer that question for yourself.
Well, you're not a LEO who's out and about putting people in cages. So it's a little less important that people have the right to film you.
Sorry, if you are in a public area, you are fair game. Period. This is doubly true for police. If you are walking down a public sidewalk and I want to take video of you and you don't like it, tough shit. Same goes for a security camera on the outside of a store that takes video of the sidewalk that you might want to walk down.
you guys can't begin to fathom how stupid you siound to a normal law abiding citizen or any person with a normally functioning mind.
all of tend to reflect your status in school in the bottom half of the class. stupid is as stupid does and you guys are living proof of it.
"excuse me, officer. is it okay if i film you beating up that innocent person?" " no? okay, sir."
you really are that stupid! you have the perfect qualifications for being a cop.
Just kill yourself already! You have NOTHING to offer soceity.
Film you working at the donkeys show?
Don't want to be filmed in public? Wear a burka. Available at your local Moslem clothing supply store.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDQYCG2-PMo
YOU are a Private Citizen.
YOU don't have a uniform.
YOU didn't swear to uphold the constitution.
YOU are not paid by us and work for us.
There's a difference.
Capiche?
Grab& Smash. Unorthodox .
Cool. This cop will be part of the "income inequality" correction squad.
y'all better recognize their hiring these types of psychopathic mother fucker precisely because they r psychopaths...
They test for it. They do it in the military too.
along with a standard dashcam, you should have a few small hidden cameras in you car to make sure you're not setup. these are the times we live in
It would probably be best to stream the video to a remote server recording device of some kind, as well. They know to take the recording media, though some of them are stupid enough to not think of it in the heat of their violent frenzy.
Soon they'll be hauling off these people and making them diappear like the East German Stasi or Stalin's secret police.
Knock on the door and hauling them off as enemes of their state.
That already happened in Chicago. http://chicagotorture.org/
All's that left to uncover are the mass graves and the death camps.
She should have been glad she didn't wear Google Glasses, or she may have been punched in the face!
I love, love, love this country!! XOXOXO
Just got that pig in some deep shit.
"_uck the police."
a) B
b) L
c) F
D) D
I chose D, because I wouldn't do C even with your dick.
"this little thing called the Internet ... makes it much harder to govern."
I assure you, they're working on correcting the problem
Goyim need to learn not to question the system Jews have set up, doesn't matter what your Constitution says. Now get back to work and give us half+, or suit up and kill for Israel, but either way shut the fuck up.
Must be really nice placing all the world's problems on the doorstep of one group of people. Must make thinking much easier for you.
Why don't you help the situation, contact everyone you know and get AIPAC removed from the US...
Hows that? That would help.
It looks like people will in the future shoot Police at sight in order to avoid being killed or robbed.
I felt threatened. Works for them.
Why does it seem the perpetrators seemingly ALL have bald heads?....
Why do prostitutes shave their pussies? Club requirement.
So crabs have no where to hang out?
'all of the guys' shaved their heads after 9/11.
It was a Samsung, so the courts will drop the case.
LOL...yes...and since Apple is propping up CALPERS it will be dropped twice as fast.
Apple invented icons and the question mark, don't 'cha know.
Guess this goon will have to start destroying everyone's phone that's out there next time.
It's creating the bankster rulled goons vs the small people.
Careful the bansters are still in the process of seizing guns so the small people have no way to defend themselves.
She should have stepped back a little to video...and it appears do a little less trash talking when 3 feet away.
But the cop should have walked her back, not smashed the phone.
The eyewitness testimony, backed up by a reporter who later visited the site to show where the Police investigation was, vice where the woman was, indicated she was filiming from over 150 feet away.
The person who recorded the viral video said, "When you see police near her, it is only because they came to where she was recording."
So...In the video you can see two officers facing stage right, and a third (who destroys the phone) facing the camera. The impression is that the arrest is happening feet from the woman with the phone. Not so. The two facing right are 150 feet, and four houses away from the other officers who are actually doing the "bust"...during which they, ironically, were releasing people one-by-one...according to the witness.
Shortly, something besides a phone-smashing stinks here. Why were they 'arresting' people, "Facedown with guns to the head" ...and then releasing them????
The normal procedure is to put them facedown to cuff and disarm them. The difference implies they were doing something other than arresting, and using their "guns-to-the-head" to do it.
Might that be why the police walked 150 feet to smash this woman's cell phone? So there would be no record of the 'not-arrests' that they were doing??
I didn't see anything she was doing that "iinterfered" with the work. She wasn't elbowing in, leaning over their shoulder, or getting between them and their subjects. Plus, Mr. Big came from the other side of the group, one of the farther members being "interfered" with. I agree, you should be able to sue personally. There are no limits to bad police behavior because none have been set. When it's out of their personal pocket, things will change, and fast.
US Police is being increasingly militarized and now kills people at a rate 70 times higher than other first world countries:
From Occupation to “Occupy”: The Israelification of American Domestic Security
The Israelification of America’s security apparatus, recently unleashed against the OWS, has taken place at every level of law enforcement.But already, the Israelification of American law enforcement appears to have intensified police hostility towards the civilian population, blurring the lines between protesters, common criminals, and terrorists. As Dichter said, they are all just “crimiterrorists.”
http://www.alternet.org/story/153307/from_occupation_to_%E2%80%9Coccupy%...
On average, US police kill people at a rate 70 times higher than any of the other first world countries as they “protect and serve” the American citizens.
So much for the Land of the Free…..
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/american-cops-killed-people-month-march...
That officer is clearly identifiable. Fire the fucker and let him work loading dump trucks.
Don't forget who pays him!!
Fire him? Fuck off. Prosecute the asshole then fire him. Then see if he can even get a job at McDonalds